"The day science begins to study non physical phenomena,it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of it's existence." Nikola Tesla

Is Dean Radin the Einstein of this era, and no-one is recognising him?. This is ground-breaking real science at the boundary between mind and matter!!

I am a believer in Quantum Physics to help lift our world up. Dr. Radin, you are the first who show experiments to help show that consciousness creates reality. Thanks.

Thank You ... All of you who are/where involved and to those who brings it here. Standing ovations!!!!! This was posted 2 years ago ... so now I get to look around to see what has happened since then ... really hoping the guy in France has had significant results by now. Love & Peace to All

When I studied tom Campbell’s stuff I liked the idea that the universe exists as a probability field until we measure it and it then has to become something. This reminds me of that.

But how do i 'influence' my bank account? I just want to collapse my ' debt wave function' into a positive money mass. (PS this comment was mend to be cynical and fun , so please stop giving me law of attraction advise or that i need a 2nd job )

If the claimed results of 5-8 sigma in dozens of rounds and variations of the experiment is accurate, then these guys are onto something. Before anyone calls "woo," they need to examine the results and attempt to replicate them. I'm not going to make a judgement either way, but I really hope we see experiments follow these results.

I believe there may be a big flaw in all of those tests. You may have shielded it against selective-reporting, but it doesn’t look like you have shield it against *selective-testing*. Except in case of robot testings, where all tests are previously scheduled, and even worse if robot tests were performed subsequently. I’ll explain what seems to have happened. 1) Subsequent testing:
First, the double slit unit is subjected an increase in temperature of its components along the 30 seconds of testing. However, if those tests are done subsequently, then this effect will be cancelled, since the unit will just “keep warm” through the entire set of tests. The unit may also be subjected to other changes along the test, such as the accumulation of static, but that also tends to stabilise at given level when a subsequent set of tests are performed. So one hypothesis is that all robot testings were done subsequently, while human testings were not. 2) Scheduled testing: Second, we know that there are a number of external factors which may interfere with the double slit unit results, possibly reducing the interference pattern along the test. Examples are: - ambient temperature - electromagnetic force of the moon (depending on it's phase) - moisture? I’m assuming the testings took weeks or months and during this period, the external factors above fluctuated in magnitude. Now the thing is that robot observers were not choosing when to perform their tests, while human observers can always make a choice. So the second hypothesis is that human observers were making choices about when to start their tests, and how many tests to perform, and their choices were made based on the feedback they got, biasing the test schedule towards ways that provide positive feedbacks. In other words, when receiving a positive feedback, humans became more exited about repeating it, and even about inviting other test candidates. By contrast, when receiving negative feedbacks, the test participants would become frustrated and then tend to withdraw from the experiment. The Linux robot observers, however, are not subjected to that because they have no feelings and no freedom of choice about their schedules. Now why did meditators perform better? Well they have strong faith in the power of meditation, so their motivation to do more tests was being more strongly modulated by the test’s feedback. Hence, they increased the test schedule selectiveness. To eliminate all of those experiment biases, my suggestion is to always use two double slit units, both at the same time, one being observed by a human, and the other being observed by Linux robot. This way, the robot schedule and testing selectivity will precisely match with the corresponding human choices of when to perform the test and how many times to perform it. Additionally, to avoid any possible difference between those two units, the choice of which unit will be observed by humans and which will be observed by the linux robot must be an alternated choice. That means humans will observe unit A in all odd numbered tests and unit B in all even numbered tests. I predict that in such case robot results will match with human results and you’ll, both of them apparently influencing the test results in the way they were instructed to do. But don’t jump into the conclusion that linux robots do have consciousness too. It’s just that their results are also biased by selective-testing. Please do tell me if my hypothesis might be acceptable.

It'd be interesting to test whether the number of people focusing their attention on a single device at once affects the results.

When we start developing AI, this will be a good way to test whether they are actually becoming conscious.

I know it’s considered a bit woo woo but it’s worth looking at the work on esoteric chemistry by Annie Besant. Through meditation she was able to observe elements at atomic level, some of which had not been discovered at the time. It would be amazing to do these experiments with people who are very advanced meditators.

I got a OH MY GOD feeling too when I was watching this. I feel I am blessed by the fact that I had the chance to watch this observation by Dr. Radin. Thank you doctor for your enthusiasm and your effort to take advantage of your knowledge and the current technology to decode our universe. It demystifies the once mystical and illustrates that our minds are far more powerful than we thought. I am hopeful about our future after watching your study!

"If you think you understand quantum theory . . . you don't understand quantum theory." -Richard Feynman

The University of São Paulo guy's name is Gabriel Guerrer, he actually crowdfounded this Project and it's running tests about this experiment.

So thoughts and prayers matter.

This is great information! Here is something EVERYONE can do. I show all the kids on holiday get-together days (usually pool parties here in Florida) that they can directly control matter in their universe. I show them that they can evaporate condensed clouds (make them disappear through evaporation) in under 5 to 6 minutes 98% of the time. Try it yourself, and get witnesses for the SHOCK & AWE value (grin). Find 3 or 4 small SLOW moving clouds (not touching each other) and pick one of them (and make sure everyone knows what cloud you selected), then literally stare at that particular cloud and tell it to evaporate, disappear, go away! Repeat it aloud to ensure no one interrupts your thought processes (not needed when you are alone, obviously). You must set your honest intention that the cloud WILL EVAPORATE and disappear. And it does, sometimes as quickly as 3 to 4 minute, but usually 5 minutes on average, a few can take as long as 7 minutes (larger clouds). You could do one cloud by itself, but it is better to have "Control" clouds next to your cloud (that disappears). Sometimes we try to cut a cloud in half (and state that is what we are doing) then do each half. If there are planes with grayish exhausts (yes, "chem-trails") and this is mixed in with the clouds, don't bother since you will NOT evaporate metal particulates no matter how much you concentrate. It is called "Cloud Busting" and my theory is that we radiate vibrations in the ether (aether, source field - pick your favorite name) from our eyes and also from the crown of our heads and this energy (and your emotion) is absorbed in the condensed water. I suspect that most of you have heard recent discoveries on the ability of water to become structured and hold energy (and specific emotions, as well)? If not, search the Internet and learn. As long as they are old enough to have the patience, children are usually VERY good at it. Keep in mind that a small cloud may contain several gallons of water! That is a lot of energy you are controlling. And one good thing is, even people who are not sure they can do it (and state so), almost always CAN do it. "Try it, You'll like it!"

Journal articles associated with the work described in this video: Radin, D. I., Michel, L, Wendland, P., Rickenbach, R., Delorme, A., Galdamez, K. (2012). Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments. Physics Essays, 25 (2), 157-171. Radin, D. I., Delorme, A.., Michel, L., Johnston, J. (2013). Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern: Experiments and a model. Physics Essays. 26 (4), 553-566. Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays. 29 (1), 14-22. Radin, D. Michel, L., Pierce, A. Delorme, A. (2015). Psychophysical interactions with a single-photon double-slit optical system. Quantum Biosystems. 6 (1), 82-98. Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2015). Reassessment of an independent verification of psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern. Physics Essays. 28 (4), 415-416. Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays. 29 (1), 14-22.

I don't think this has yet received the attention it deserves. This is amazing.

So, Linux is not conscious - yet. That's good to know. We should test Linux yearly and Windows every ten years just to be safe.

You might be interested to know that there is a type of buddhist meditation, where some monk might imagine an image in their mind, and suddenly, all the other meditators in the room pop the same image in their minds later on. After the meditation session, they get together and discuss about their visions and this is how they found it out.

Extremely fascinating. I'm curious to see a double-slit experiment done with observers placed within a sensory deprivation tank while the experiment is conducted, so as to remove sensory distortion to one's consciousness and focus.

Oh one more thing, Id like to see the results with people on psychedelics, specifically dmt

i'd love to see someone like Wim Hof, the _Dutch extreme athlete noted for his ability to withstand freezing temperatures,_ participate in this experiment! he has _amazing_ control over his own body's response to the cold and could possibly use those same capabilities to affect the results in _this_ experiment as well.

How very interesting. If someone can figure how, (and why) the Universe is doing this, well there is a Nobel Prize waiting for you. It's simply mind boggling.

Cant believe I have only just found this experiment showing Consciousness affecting Matter. Nice to know I am not mad!

Here is an interesting thing to try: have each person participating in the experiment create a profile then see if some users generate better results more consistently. Ideally that profile would be connected to a bunch of data about them preferably including how large their frontal cortex is, how meditative, intelligent, empathetic, etc they are, how high of a concentration of rose-hip neurons they have, probably include their genome. If these experiments mean anything we could effectively quantify the potency of a soul and perhaps determine if that potency is related to physical factors.

After watching this, it made me think of all of the talk about thoughts, and how positive/negative thoughts can manifest positive/negative outcomes in our lives. If I take what I learned from this video, and break down my comment based off this videos explanations, then if everything are waves (Random outcomes), until a conscious observation of it ('It' being thoughts about a situation in my life), then this could be the reason why, if what we give thought to (i.e., a conscious observation to a possible outcome of a current situation in our lives), then we stop the randomness, and pull into our lives the quantum's that we see (Or in most cases fear). So if we choose to see things (Or give conscious observation), to positive outcomes, then the latter is what we will pull into our lives to manifest..... very interesting.

This was sooooo PERFECT 👌!!! I loved it !!! I’ve been waiting for an explanation like this for a long time !!! Many thanks 🙏

what about testing 3 meditators focusing all at once?

I hosetly believe Dean Radin will bring Remote Viewing to the forefront of the science community...Such an incredibly smart n astute man to lead this to the very front of non locality & Quantum Entanglement!! Always interesting & intelligent presentations done by this man right here!!! Thanks for all your endless & painstaking experiments!!!

I do Trial Design and Analysis for a fortune 15 company and I can tell you all that we rarely if ever see 5 Sigma results. 5 Sigma is only 233 DPMO (Defects per Million Opportunities). He has checked for p-hacking and moved the experiment to the internet to remove possible Trial Group interactions. This is very persuasive.

Dean, you are deeply appreciated and Miceal says, "Hello!"

Awareness of multiple levels of reality is awesome, its like the brink of anxiety. Its a systemic overload of feelings (synaptic information) within 1 millisecond. Only "Lucy" knows or those who have felt this.

I think what we miss is that consciousness affects all experiments.

During a paradigm shift they attack the people like him. Radin made a huge step in a new field of science ❤

Thank you Institute of Noetic Sciences!!!! I appreciate this type of science being explained in a beautifully understandable manner. I am a nurse and a believer in consciousness" affects on a quantum level. You have scientifically moved forward the theory surrounding how thoughts become things, basically. I would love to furher understand how vibrations, especially Solfeggio frequencies opposed to other frequencies, affect our physical and consciousness selfs, anyone working on something like this?

Absolutely fascinating. I look forward to further evidence. We always believe what appears to be obvious to our senses until we discover with the power of reason that it is not so.

This video disappeared when I focused on it.

Eitherway, if possible, I'd love to attend a talk/setup/convention whatever where you're showcasing this experiment.

This result is amazing. People who meditate know that clearing your mind brings you into an immediate awareness of the moment. Thoughts are like a smoke screen that conceals reality. I wonder if this awareness of whatever is occurring in the moment increases the probability of collapsing the wave function...which suggests that mental activity which is involved with the usual flow of abstract thoughts actually negates our awareness of momentary reality. In other words, we only observe the real world (collapsing the wave function) when our minds are clear and we are focused on the moment....not the future or the past or abstract thoughts.

I've known for a long time that our consciousness filters our reality. For example, when you look at a blue sky, that's filtered by our consciousness. Put a color-analyzer on the sky, at it will tell you the sky is green. Further, I discovered while connected to a heart monitor, the feedback enabled me to control my heart rate. Gawd we live in a wonderful reality.

waiting for light switches having double slit systems installed, concentrate on it and a light goes on, telekinesis!

The 'DOUBLE SLIT ' Experiment result is shown beautifully and symbolically in the HINDU temple in INDIA specially in "SHIVA TEMPLE". The Conscious observer is depicted as "NANDI, The Bull. "THE SHIVLING " inside the sanctum sanatorium is the union of SHIV- SHAKTI that is Mass and Energy leading to particle form which in turn gives rise to this Universe.

I tried cloudbusting and found it quite easy to do, and every time I did it it worked on the cloud I was focused on and not the surrounding clouds, so the chances that the wind caused the exact same cloud I was focusing on to dissipate and not to effect the clouds around it is very slim

Imagine if all of humanity stopped and meditated for world peace

Consciousness is fundamental, as in a mind and agency...wow. I’m not gonna say it but I’m sure some people are thinking the same thing.

This was 7 years ago. A more recent experiment showed that consciousness can extent. This by testing and monitoring neuron activity by having people work on something together, like a puzzle or maybe even watching a movie together. Now we always assumed people copy behavior to improve cooperation for example, but this isn’t what happens. What happens is that the brain synchronizes like a clock.. this means very specifically that somehow one consciousness has to tell the other what it’s clock is saying. The illusion of consciousness seems to be that it’s individual. When in reality it’s part of a larger whole, almost like an eco system. You can also test this rather easily, done decades ago, by splitting the left and right half of the brain. (Which in severe epilepsy cases has to be done) You now quite literally see 2 consciousness reactions from the same person even though the individual isn’t aware of this.

This confirms my belief that our thoughts do affect the outside world and how are lives progress with conscious direction, or lack of. This has been proven itself many times over in my life. Exciting stuff.

Sooo... As people concentrate more and more as to which slit the photon passed through, it sounds like the theory is human consciousness would be able to collapse the wave function and create a non interference pattern simply by meditating. Is that the theory? That would be most impressive!

This is really interesting. The fact that "distance" doesnt seem to affect the experiment is a clue itself. Maye "distance" is becoming more of "classical physics", we dont understand how two things can affect each other when they are faraway, but thats is a classical physics concept, that was born out of our common sense. I dont know if if common sense works very good in the quatum level. There must be a new way to think this, a change in paradigm.

This is a fascinating and excellent talk. Regarding the pyramid model shown towards the end: To understand how we get from consciousness to physics it would be necessary to pass through metaphysics. Specifically, it would be necessary to study a neutral metaphysical theory, the theory required for non-dualism, and explore its implications for physics. This builds a bridge between the two levels of the model. which otherwise are very difficult to connect. Perhaps research of this sort will eventually lead physicists to overcome their fears and prejudices and start to take the Buddha's description of reality seriously. It surely ought to lead to renewed interest in metaphysics and a wider recognition that the phrase 'fundamental physics' is an oxymoron. It is a strange world in which scientists are surprised to discover that consciousness is an active participant in reality. Future generations will shake their heads in wonder that anyone ever thought otherwise.

We always knew that consciousness affects matter. Say you have a conscious thought to snap your fingers, and than SNAP, matter moves!

Question: if we attach a photon detector to each individual slit, but do NOT record the result (or record and immediately delete it again before any human can read it), will this collapse the wave function or not?

First, thank you for using physics to explore the relationship between matter and consciousness, expanding our understanding of consciousness and reality. That is quite an achievement! I'm curious to know if you've conducted studies where there are longer periods of time for the meditator to focus on a task. As mentioned in your talk, there is an adjustment period between resting and focusing, each fluctuation will dampen the intensity of the meditative state. As a long term meditator, (20 years with anywhere from 1-16 hours per day), I've learned that the deeper meditative state takes time to achieve, and that this state progressively deepens to a certain point until you start to leave the meditative state, or start to ascend--sort of surface from the depths. I find that if I'm in a very deep meditative state, when something outside of myself interrupts the meditation, it can be extremely jarring--like a very loud and unexpected noise would jolt you from a deep sleep--almost painful, and you can't just pop back to the same depth instantaneously. You have to descend. So going quickly from resting to observing would greatly weaken the intensity and focus of the meditative state, making it fairly superficial. Yet even that yields remarkable results. Would those results change significantly if you removed the fluctuations in and out of the meditative states? Also, there is a lot of variation in meditators. Some people are naturals, some meditate for half an hour a few days a week, some for 16 or more hours daily. Some people meditate and access the exact same information (a lot of quantum mechanics) people accessed thousands of years ago, as documented in Vedic scriptures. And others meditate all their lives and never reach that place. It would be really interesting to see a study comparing the magnitude of change registered while very skilled, experienced meditators--like monks--are deeply immersed in the meditative state, without the fluctuation (between focus and resting) deadening the intensity or depth of the meditation. Would the depth of the meditation affect the magnitude of the change? Is the magnitude of change affected by the skill level of the meditator? What happens if you have many meditators at the same time focus on the same thing?

By the way love ur books Dean I have three and will be getting more keep up the good work

This is so far outside classical physics and the understanding it has given us that its blowing my face off that more resources haven’t been allocated to checking verifying and then expanding on these findings. If there is something here, it tells us something incredible about reality. That needs more examination.

Not here supporting Radin blindly or arguing that such findings are completely impossible. but lets face it guys, most of you are denying these findings like a bunch of Pre Renaissance catholics. Radin might be wrong, maybe he made errors or made up those statistics, as most of you claim. if so prove it. and not by trolling, i mean trolling is fun no doubt when you have nothing better to do, but by experimenting such a probability again and again till its perfect or plain bs.(if you cant, then shut up, wait, watch and let others do) Theories are proven wrong all the time, Newton was proven wrong by Einstein, Einstein by Bohr. i am not saying that Radin is correct with 100% certainty or that he is Einstein, and i also agree that this research needs revision and requires taking into account possible other factors. but i am questioning those people who claim that this cannot be science in any way, like some religious fanatics. if he is wrong, prove it. if he is right, accept it. learn to have unbiased opinions if you believe in science, or else, join a cult. hardcore evidence falsifying these claims in the reply section would be greatly appreciated.

Is there any followup on this? More independent replications, critic...etc?

This is huge. How is it not talked aboout more ?!!

I observed changes with an ICP atomic spectrometer during analysis of specific metal impurities in water if certain individuals came into my lab during testing. I always found that to be odd. There was always variation in the number of photon count.

Buddha:"I've told you so" )))

great work... unbelievable efforts.... kudoa

Awesome work. I consciousness wish my conscious mind was clever enough to understand it all however. Wonderfully delivered

I can't help noticing that they sought repetition and confirmation from some outside scientist who seemed excited about the results, but who seems yet to have published anything. You'd think that such astonishing initial results would be discussed everywhere by now.

does this mean that light and all forms of energy "act" differently when we either don't know if them or don't think of them?

I have experienced mind/matter results in my life. This is absolutely true.

This is very interesting. I wonder if we also have the ability to turn particles back into waves in addition to the converse? Telekinesis?

These experiments are always so intriguing. Double slit gets me every time!

Great talk!

I am now sending a mental image that the presenter is Donald Duck.....not working yet but I'm going to keep trying.

To answer the second gentleman's question at the end, is "intent". The action of "intent" is what influences the outcome.

I think Dr. Radin should do an experiment with Psychics which I think have more powerful minds than the meditators. There are some people who strongly believe psychics have extraordinary mind powers.

Uncomfortably, this suggests to me, many aspects of Humanity that are pushed aside as nonsense, are in fact, going to be proved as true. Maybe the words passed down, are more relevant than what we are trying to understand.

Its great that you are also carrying out these experiements, there have been many physicists over time who have looked into this and its correlation with conciousness over control of matter. Where it goes deeper is when you start applying this to existence itself. Do we control the power of existence by achnowledging it exists?

Very very interesting. There does seem to be a statistical trend in consciousness being able to collapse a wave function. Why use one observer? Hire 100 meditators, have them all work at the same time, and collapse those wave functions!

In digital radionics using TRNG this phenomena is already used since decades for analysis. Interesting is, that when you don't analyze a person / animal / agriculture aera, then the result really makes no sense, it tends always to show a normal random distribution. But if you for example analyze a person or animal then the result deviates from random chance and it represents a meaning inside of a specific context.

I remember the future it is like it happened before i was born.I can only remember big events and only 1 or 2 days before they happen.

collective Imagineering is creating the universe of which we are the eyes and ears.

Do you have a good way to convert your graphing, spreadsheet work into 3D photography imaging with acquired photography? If so I would like to see that as presentation as well. Great presentation!

Wow finally ! Humanity may make that next leap in evolution. There are a few that discovered this fact many years ago I am happy to say I am able to follow the path set by one.

remote viewing experimentation proved consciousness as non local in the 70's by Stanford Research Laboratories. See the book "Mind Reach".

This should be front page news. I’m stunned it’s even here on YT.

Having the Interferometer on top of some Servers would be a big source for vibration. Some may be mechanically induced, others inductive.

I think it is more accurate to conclude consciousness, is an electromagnetic spectral interference that is in a penetrating energetic state similar to an x-ray. I.E is able to pass soft material, and Or to the way a neutrino is able to pass through the earth. The the mind "bending" the wave like water does to light via refraction.

I wonder if they used teams of observers/mediators if that might produce an even lower number?

Why didn't he gather people with the best score, and asked them to do the experiment again, but this time simultaneously to crush the system whit a full wave collapse?!

ok this is big. thanks for sharing..... im glad that this happen in my lifetime. hope to see an ultimate breatkthrough in few years. cant wait

Next test to avoid some of the placebo effect: Try the meditators again, and do it all the same, except ask them to concentrate on things totally unrelated to the double slit process. See if their effect goes away.

Has anyone ever tested a group of people concentrating of the same outcome to see if the effect is magnified?

Fascinating!

Excelent video. Have you tried asking the meditators questions to try to narrow who is most likely to have an effect? 1. Are you a spiritual person? 2. Do you believe in God? 3. Do you pray? 4. Are you creative? 5. Are you a scientist? 6. Do you believe in free will? Etc. Perhapse a pattern can be found… To identify Precogs? Then a study conducted with highly effective minds only…

Excellent presentation and thought provoking, well researched findings. I believe that consciousness will be proven to be a quantum force that is every bit as real as the other four known forces of physics. We just don't understand it well enough yet, but leading edge work such as yours is helping to resolve that. Thanks and keep up the great work!

Why do they think that observation can influence matter but that “prediction” does not. Could not perdition actually steer what the outcome becomes?

I’m imaging a traveler on a train journey around the world. He has his eyes closed. For one second he is allowed to open his eyes. After the journey he is asked to describe the world based on what he saw. Is this where we are? It’s a start and utterly exhilarating.

We all need a shift of spiritual growth and understand from ancient truths

Radin is in a class of his own. Very few people, even in physics or so-called normal psychology, can match him for presentation, design and carrying out experiments.

Seeing the comment section I think we should just replicate the experiment and see who is right.

Very good Colloquium! Thanks for sharing!

I wonder whether they can time shift the experiment so their conscious thoughts can travel backwards and forwards in time to affect the experiment in the past as well as the future.

To confirm your findings, independent researchers must run the experiment with their own equipment. Analyzing your generated data doesn't count. Therefore, where is the white paper that describes how to reproduce the experiment? For instance, where can we buy the equipment? Also, where did you publish your equations and programs, etc?