Exactly you have to be dogmatic materialist to be funded and taken serious. No one challenges this, they just move on and do calculations, they don't think.

I'll give you an example why people shouldn't be that way. Dr Maxwell Maltz wrote a book called psycho-cybernetics in the book he is speaking about the 2 self images human beings have. One is the outter self image which is the way you look in front of a mirror and there is a inner self image that which automatically decides what is possible and not possible in accordance to that puts a limits to itself if it's not improved it's a cybernetic mechanism also can be called a servo-mechanism it's like an autopilot suppose you get out of your field of ''what is possible'' immediately you'll get back to your ''what is possible'' field cause the system works that way it creates tremendous discomfort for one to expand their self image and funny thing is that whole world or the scientific community has an self image think it's like a human organism if you get out of ''what is possible'' field you'll find yourself in an extremely uncomfortable situation that happened to some people who were stepped into genetics field versus epigenetics field in some university I saw in one of the dr bruce lipton video where a teacher refused to change the text books and the way they teach because it would cost their job and the text books currently exist in the university you may be skeptic and would have a mind that contains a filter you wouldn't go by assumptions but in the end it takes guts to change things, it takes guts.

See most of these myopic, close-minded comments. “Scientists” are some of the most insecure, terrified souls on the planet.

Idk seems emergent to me.

@@smokey04200420that theory was proven wrong time and time again

@@smokey04200420you only need to learn about NDEs to prove how wrong this claim is

Excellent idea. One invention I've been tossing around for a while now...an AI/robot with consciousness (which I suspect, free will becomes greater, the higher it is). One issue is, if awareness is fundamental, then consciousness is everywhere. Personally, I think Tom Campbell is on to something with his Theory Of Everything (there's a video where he met Radin and chatted). Based on that, the tricky part with giving a robot/AI a "soul" (sort of my goal) is creating the interface between this dead, virtual, junk we think of as the material world with the hidden, non-local world.

Computer no, but our belief that he can do it will collapse it. So We will believe computer done it but always it will be our belief. Also believe of particles is recorded in to Us, That is the reason We ware able to observe this so called "collapsing wave function experiment"

Can you elaborate further on this idea please? i never heard of it quite before, but also, I need more literature on this issue, since I consider myself a layman on quantum theory. Gracias!

Perhaps AI will only emerge with quantum computers.

Wow, your question is so genius! You just invented the equivalent of litmus test for consciousness! 😄

"The Field" is the sandbox of creation. The spirit splinters and projects itself through the field to render this reality. Our bodies are experiencers and transceivers and perceivers, not conceivers. This is the echo mirror of creation. Enjoy the ride!

Very interesting , i heard monks in Orthodoxy speak about the true prayer to God are from their heart.

You will find this in the Quran a lot, it speaks about the heart being blind so people can't see. Interesting observation

But they sure can speculate on everything under the sun, hypothesize (falsely), and misinterpret what they do get. And, while spinning up a bunch of speculation and blending it with facts, they are wasting time and money chasing after the wrong aspects of everything they are studying. Noetic "sciences' are filling their own bank accounts for retirement. I see zero actual proof and facts that can be used for future research. I see a lot of speculation and nonsense. Prof. Persinger did more to promote actual science in one study. Radin is wasting our time.

Do you have a link to the study you're referencing?

Interesting. You're essentially implying that the "me" - as in the higher soul - made a decision to be here and chose its vehicle, which is this avatar. In the future it could be possible for other souls to decide to choose the vehicle of an AI or robot, if its sophisticated enough.

@@postplays exactly!!

Nobody can effect your internal environment unless you allow them to program you. There is no "out there there", you create your own reality.

Good idea

they did this with linux computer.... :)

In fact, in the real experience, there was a measureing device, a detector, measuring the photon or electron. It was not "only looked at" and because of this changed it's behavior. It was measured and detected via an technical device. Big difference!

Nothing would change because this was caused by the interaction with the equipment itself. Not the person or being observing it. The big crushed the little, basically. I heard it describing was a robotic arm meant to take measurements of an egg, crushing the egg. The egg was just too fragile for the robotic arm to measure without destroying it.

They don't buy it because the observer effect has nothing to do with a person looking. Observer means interaction in the QM world. It doesn't mean mind or consciousness. There was an interaction with the equipment used, not our brains.

They're TERRIFIED of consciousness. It's the end of Classical science as we know it. Careers gone.

And not only that... consciousness being fundamental SCREAMS God.

More importantly, it opens the door on psychic phenomena. And where would the finger of blame and persecution be,…. if the mind was examined and the heaven and hell it chooses between was exposed? How would you react if a person on trial for murder was cleared on the grounds that he was possessed by a dead spirit. (And the dead spirit had their name cleared because of some remnant ju ju???

Here's a better mind tingler for you: Remote view your physical body to another place.

This is awesome. I'm heading back down the swamp to get my Xwing out.

How can this be used to heal the body? Like how lol. Seems like you might know. Janice

I disagree, my motive is not to argue however to enlighten through experience. I've taken computer programming and have an insight you may not be aware of which contradicts your hypnosis. (To be humble, I welcome your retort(: I see the big bang like God(The creator of physics, as Einstein put it: the Cosmos obeys certain laws and someone must have wrote them) computer programed files then compiled them and executed his work (double clicked an EXE. per say): Loop If this ... Then that ... Exit loop when ... This is how programs are made. Web designers can relate, as they program in frames, yet their homepage calls the separate variables/files to play out as intended. INTENDED, not simulated. I know religion doesn't normally relate with science, however in spite of that, we have the creation days of Genesis being understood only thousands of years later by Astrophysicists and Geologists as being completely accurate yet those words of information were wrote by unscientific rabbis who couldn't have known such knowledge, as Moses(the author) and Job who wrote scientifically accurate realities about the Universe long before discovered to be true by astrophysicists: "Can you bind the chains of the Pleiades, Or loosen the cords of Orion?" It wasn't discovered until only recently that some galaxies are Tidal Locked, yet Job knew about them (without a telescope)? This is undeniable proof that God (through the/his Spirit) has enlightened the worthy through out time. Much like how DNA has proven Darwin incorrect in his hypothisis that over time complex organisms can and do fall into place, we now realize that DNA (Amino Acids connected by Peptides forming chains to create Proteins) could not possibly formed by chance no matter any time frame: Hence DNA requires proteins to exist AT THE SAME TIME protein wouldn't exist without the instructions from DNA in the first place. Hence the chicken or the egg first age old question was answered by creation and never could be by evolution. Life is a school for the soul, not a simulation, as choice is a major factor for each and everyone of us: MOTIVE to LIVE, MOTIVE to DIE(sleep forever).

@@relimic Genesis got it wrong. According to the Elohim (Gods) light was created after the earth was created and not before. Therefore Genesis is proven to be incorrect and your entire bases for your argument false. Also if this is a simulation clearly there must be creators and so simulation theory is saying there is a god/creator. And if god, gods made a reality outside of their realm it will be a simulation or virtual world no matter how you look at it. Also this will take nothing away from life and its meaning if we were is a simulation. To us this is our reality no matter what. If you are truly enlightened perhaps you can give a convincing argument to why light came after the earth was created from the perspective of a paleontologist or geologist.

@@DestianLight Not according to Hugh Ross an Astrophysicist; you aren't an expert, and either am I ... but he is.

its not about sight... its about atention

ADD is a joke. I feel pity for people who get labelled with this crap.

The experiment demanded people to alternately (for 20-30s each) pay attention to and then remove their attention from the device or a defined goal. It turned out that focusing did, with high statistical significance, change the interference pattern, while removing one's attention didn't change much. It was also made clear that experienced meditators were much more successful in this experiment than non-meditators, and there was essentially no effect when a computer was used. So from this, the answer to your question should be obvious: There should be no significant effect when someone doesn't pay any attention at all, and I would expect people with ADD to perform very badly, probably worse than the non-meditators used in the experiments.

Science is a method for observing the thing we call reality. The human context introduces ideology and professional hubris to this blameless activity. Radin makes an excellent point in another video, where he asks what the percentage of human knowledge is, expressed as a fraction? Materialists generally express it close to a whole number, whereas the reality may well be close to zero.

yeah lol! even the bald head! :p

Why should a reincarnation have similar facial features?

@@AirSandFire Because that's the image one has in one's mind. If you don't like the way you look now, think of a good looking image you could have.

Detected after the experiment is done?

A series of newly proposed, innovative quantum wave-particle duality experiments (variations on classical double slit) has the potential to clearly demonstrate whether or not material reality is actually virtual. These experiments constrain all variables so that the only possible explanation/reason for “probability wave function collapse,” if that happens, will be because a conscious observer has knowledge of, or potential knowledge of, the which-way data. Which would mean that consciousness - or, more precisely, the availability of the which-way data to conscious observers - is, indeed, the one and only reason for “probability wave function collapse." The team who wrote the peer reviewed paper includes physicists and mathematicians from NASA, JPL and Cal Tech. They're currently forming a 501c3 to raise funding for the experimental set-up. From the paper: On rendering reality: It is now well understood in the emerging science of Uncertainty Quantification that low complexity computation must be performed with hierarchies of multi-fidelity models. It is also now well understood, in the domain of game development, that low computational complexity requires rendering/displaying content only when observed by a player. Recent games, such as No-Man’s Sky and Boundless, have shown that vast open universes (potentially including “over 18 quintillion planets with their own sets of flora and fauna”) are made feasible by creating content, only at the moment the corresponding information becomes available for observation by a player, through randomized generation techniques (such as procedural generation). Therefore, to minimize computational complexity in the simulation theory, the system performing the simulation would render reality only at the moment the corresponding information becomes available for observation by a conscious observer … Hopefully the experiments will be undertaken relatively soon: www.ijqf.org/wps/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/IJQF2017v3n3p2.pdf

You just answered your own question.

God.

The thing is you can't know. How can you know you or monkey or dog collapsed it? Without observing the results you can't know the end of experiment.

@Stephen Doane - Thanks, if the results in this video were real, then the ability of the mind to collapse the wave function, could then be designed into an on/off switch, so the on/off switch could then control everything from a car engine, to a stealth bomber... all via thinking about the photons in the laser beam. So, where is the industrial application of this amazing thought-changes-light... well, I guess it stops at the experimental level, and once you start the on/off switch, then for some reason the interface of mind versus photon... doesn't function anymore. This guy is in the same ballpark as Jesse Ventura and Judy Wood, officialdom presenting nonsense to the public sphere. Little do Americans now that a lot of the world isn't analyzing what is fake & real and expect _everything_ inside officaldom to be real, while Americans know that's not the case.

Yea, I don't think "super saiyan"(thats funny AF btw) is "permitted"(weather via design or otherwise). I'd argue that there is ample evidence that intent absolutely can & does modify the probabilities of future outcomes, BUT it is only within the window of that thing's/event's "natural uncertainty". Where the uncertainty is low is where we find "reality"(both inner & shared/consensus) to be approximately "objective". Where it is high, is where we can change it the most. But the windows are typically small precisely bc its a shared reality/multi-player game, & even the "unconscious intents"(oxymoron), also beliefs & expectations etc., push things in opposing directions. Of course those +/-'s window #'s could change as we evolve, especially If there is an "evaluative/administrative component" to "the source"(such as a Rendering Engine Admin in Campbell's LCS for instance). Or even in the case where the whole thing is much less or even not at all "intentional", as in Kastrup's Altars, there's little reason to think such things would have to remain fixed indefinitely, as the evidence is quite clear that pretty much everything evolves. I think such notions can hold water in virtually(no pun) ANY Idealism based model. Campbell has a notion of a PSI uncertainty principle, where you can bend the rules much further in private, & perhaps even break them but NOT if/when the news crew shows up, simply bc our "average quality of being" isn't ready, as it could threaten the whole purpose of "physical"(the game/soul lab experiment). There always has to be some "plausible deniability"(for the time being anyway). Though regardless, PSI does seem to be an intrinsic feedback mechanism of this reality to varying extents already, which is quite interesting imo all on its own(no meta-physics even required). Though the main reason the whole thing is still taboo & has stagnated is bc we do need new/different(even old/recycled ie. Idealism) mataphical paradigms & models such as Campbell's VR's or Kastup's Alters etc..

Also someone coughed, maybe this was a pre-covid warning =P

@Princess Bubbles - thanks, the focus of thought achieving the alleged results here, isn't necessarily consciousness. For example, thinking about the laser, could summon the angry ghost which changes the waveform of the laser, this isn't void of the possible ways to achieve the result, as I see no explanation in this video how it's achieved, anyway. Also, why would human thought _only_ affect the photons in a laser, that's not logical at all. If this result is real, you can extrapolate it all the way to human thought changing the path of a bullet, how different are photons and atoms in a bullet ? So yeah, (...), this video appears to me to be sophisticated fakery, in the same ballpark as Jesse Ventura & Judy Wood, inside officialdom, speaking nonsense under the shadow-investors intent of social engineering. In the real world, thinking (an electrical existence), doesn't change photons in the room next door. Furthermore, beyond thinking, a spiritual consciousness, also doesn't affect photons... and more than that, _only_ photons. (Why? Because, beyond electrical [physical] thinking, the spiritual consciousness thing is outside of this world, it doesn't 'come back to play with photons'). Plus, the way the talks is lacklustre, no excitement, no interest in his alleged discovery at all.

Mind blowing! It's interesting notice that if you setup a experiment to test the possibility of simulation you won't be considered crazy or New Age. I liked the way they approached the problem without sound too crank.

Reality is a marriage of "Total Recall" (the old one with Schwarzenegger) and "The Sims". Scientists prefer to use No-Mans Sky and Boundless, same thing.

Giant microphone, crap audio

I know. I hate that it's difficult to hear him, because he's brilliant

Well in principle you might be able to do it psychically as with Remote Viewing (clairvoyance) and possibly anywhere in time whether past, present, or future.

With the device housed in a classic British, blue police box, even better.

@RodCornholio Hmm, for some reason that sounds familiar... a companion here and there so you don't go home alone?

@Lawshorizon O.K. but you go first.

If you wanted to physically and solidly go from one location to another, in space and time, then all you have to do is convince nature (the quantum information system) that you "are" at that location and, per consequence, "be" at that location. It's the same with healing effects -- convince nature that you are well and you will be well (e.g. using visualization). So far, it looks like no one has been successful at location-shifting (other then a few stories which may or may not be true); however, there's been some remarkable success with healing effects.

94valeRa01 bending different realities. Physical plane compared to spiritual/astral/dream realm.