This one is also cool.

I have FlightControlReplay. FlightControlReplay induce micro stutters, maybe it's better now with all new updates, i have to give it a new try. I need to setup some camera view or learn how to better use it. Maybe buy addon for this, i don't like P3D legacy camera, it's do the job for flight but for video it's a little painfull to use. Ultimately it's time consuming, a time that i don't have for now. I try to spend less time as possible for videos editing, because for each video i do tests flight for the quality and the weather. I would say, for a video, at least 50% of the work is spend to choose the airport and the purpose, prepare and settup things for P3D, 35% for the final capture (sometime it's done in one flight, sometime 8) and the last 15% for video editing. For this video i even contact FSX3D because of issues with the runway markers of the scenery and i had to redo intirely the ILS data of the scenery. I spend a lot of time for the weather, i'm always in historical mode or custom mode. Now that i have a stable P3D settings and all tool and precess that i need to find/settup weather quickly (i search in metar database using literal expression to filter the weather i want for the video and i even did a custom tool to generate custom weather effect injection for ASP3D). So maybe i can spend time for that now, but i really want to learn how to create a good scenery in P3D, with custom assets and photoscenery, it's not easy and time consuming.

@@JaGna_ totally agree. Making videos for youtube requires huge effort, especially in the editing part. For a flight simmer, it is like double the effort. You always don't get what you were willing to. Hence, gotta redo the flights. That's relatable. Take your time. You are doing good. Keep up the good work.

I guess arround 1.2g... Between 1.15g and 1.3g I won't use Landing Rate Monitor anymore (at least for now) Few raison : Performance optimisation (FSLabs is a real pain sometime, i can use any add-on that i want with other aircrafts, but with FSLabs any software can be a threat) It's not precise and it's not taking all factor into acount (LRM don't make any difference between a cessna 172 and an A320). I can't find which factors is taken into account with LRM, but i'm 95% sure that it use TAS and not GS and i'm not even sure that it use (or use correctly) the weight of the AC (because weight is an important factor, and only if you make distinction between aircraft and you know how the gear compression of the aircraft react to it). I would say g-load is the good and important indicator for landing analysis, even if it's not precise, but i need an alternative to LRM. I have FS Flight Control but the landing report nerver work (and FS Flight Control is doing bad interaction with ASP3D). So i was thinking doing my own landing analysis software... But i want to find/search for a good mathematical formula and based on A320 family data (otherwise i already have this formula). Anyway, if you have a LRM like software to suggest i'm up for testing it !

@@JaGna_ use Pilot’s Life V2 . It gives detailed info about landings (touch down zone)plus it has a career mode which makes it very realistic . The software is updated regularly .. In airline flying G-load is quite important . On a side note G-loading is quite important in airline flying . Most airlines don’t allow landings of over 1.6-1.7 Gs …

@@aviator_2401 Thank's for Pilot’s Life V2 advice. I'm going to have a look. I'm not interesting on any career mode, i'm doing almost only "custom" scenario and training circuit, when i'm doing a full flight with a long cruise i use FSLabs skip to waypoint feature (because i don't want to wait, seeted, if i already know that nothing is going to happened, that's why i do scenarios).