OM SYSTEM 40-150mm f4 Pro - Hands On
Рет қаралды 27,676
Күн бұрынOM System 40-150mm f4 is a new lens from OM Digital Solutions. This I'm my hands-on video about the new lens.
Compared to the older version: • OM SYSTEM 12-40mm f2.8...
Amazon: amzn.to/3tbcPLH (Affiliate link)
⭐️📷 www.helsinkiphotoworkshops.fi
⭐️📷 My photography course: peterforsgard.retrieve.com/store
⭐️📷 More about the courses: www.ajatuksiavalokuvauksesta....
⭐️📷 1on1 sessions: www.ajatuksiavalokuvauksesta....
👉 Buy Me a Coffee: buymeacoff.ee/PeterForsgard
👉paypal.me/peterforsgard
👉 One-on-One sessions: www.ajatuksiavalokuvauksesta....
👉 Join my Facebook Group: / peterforsgardyoutube
My Channel membership is now open!
👉 Join: / @forsgardpeter
Get a Hoodie!
👉 peter-forsgard.creator-spring...
⏱Timestamps
00:00 Intro
00:23 Disclaimer
00:47 Focal Length
01:19 40-150mm lenses from OM System
02:36 Usability
03:21 Something Missing?
05:09 Specifications
05:23 Image Quality
06:57 f4.0 lenses
07:58 Am I buying it?
08:40 Price
08:49 Watch next
🎼Music from
www.epidemicsound.com
www.artlist.io
► Affiliate programs I am in:
► Cameras and Lenses:
👉 My Amazon Store: www.amazon.com/shop/peterfors...
👉 B&H Photo: bhpho.to/36rubIY
👉 Laowa lenses: www.venuslens.net/ref/602/
👉 Mitakon lenses: zyoptics.net/?ref=PeterF
► Filters:
👉 H&Y Filters: hyfilters.net/?ref=PeterF
► Software:
👉 Excire: excireeu.pxf.io/P069xe
👉 Pixlr: shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=180387...
👉 Luminar: skylum.evyy.net/c/2239822/710...
👉 Aurora HDR: skylum.evyy.net/c/2239822/309...
👉 Topaz Labs:topazlabs.com/ref/644/
👉 DxOLab: tidd.ly/3l31ho8
► Other:
👉 X-Rite: x-rite-photo.2rcf97.net/c/223...
👉 Skillshare: skillshare.eqcm.net/c/2239822...
👉 EpidemicSound: www.epidemicsound.com/referra... something from these links supports my channel. I will get a small commission.
You do not pay anything extra. Win-win.
► Want to learn more about photography or use your Olympus camera. I have coaching sessions available in my Webstore:
👉 www.ajatuksiavalokuvauksesta....
Disclaimer: I am an Olympus Visionary. I make all my content with mirrorless Olympus micro four-thirds gear.
Links to my Olympus gear (disclaimer: using these links when doing purchases, you support this channel. You pay the same price and I get a few bucks to finance this channel.)
📷 www.ajatuksiavalokuvauksesta....
👉 www.amazon.com/shop/peterfors...
► Any professional inquires please email: peter@peterforsgard.com
Links to my accounts all around the web:
My portfolio: www.peterforsgard.com
My blog (eng): bit.ly/peterfblog
My Instagram: / jpeterf
My Olympus page: my.olympus-consumer.com/membe...
My Olympus gear: www.ajatuksiavalokuvauksesta....
My kit.co store: kit.co/PeterF
#Olympus #OMSystem #PeterForsgard
(disclaimer: Some of the links above are affiliate links. Using these links when doing purchases, you support this channel. You pay the same price and I get a few bucks to finance this channel.)
@AlpacoFilms 2 жыл бұрын
I never got the 40-150 2.8 PRO because I didn’t like the size. This one however is something I’m very interested in! Thanks for doing this!
@ronaldembree3932 2 жыл бұрын
Agree, owned the 2.8 and sold it due to weight and size.
@sidneymoon8586 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the review. I’ve preordered this lens to complete my landscape f4 lens set (8-25, 12-45, and 40-150). I love the small form factor and lightweight for wilderness photography where I carry my gear long distances over rough terrain. The F2.8 version was too big and heavy to tempt me.
@ridealongwithrandy 2 жыл бұрын
Good stuff peter. I have the 2.8 version, but I think that this lens is a winner for hiking on my mini EM1X, the EM5 MKiii. Great focal length for hiking and the size is really good. The f4 does not bother me as I am a day shooter and am at f5.6-8 almost all the time. Thanks for the video Peter, Cheers!
@derekgpony 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the review Peter. I'm certainly looking at adding this lens to my kit. You are the only person I've seen give a review on the lens. Keep up the great work!
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
When this video was published it was the only review, but now I think there are a few more.
@spanksen 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Peter, seems to be a great and lighweight lens
@Centauri27 2 жыл бұрын
This is a good and compact high quality telezoom. I own the 40-150 f/2.8 with both extenders. For a lighter option, I picked up a used Panasonic 35-100 f/2.8, which I absolutely love! Even smaller and lighter than this new 40-150. I'm happy to give up on the long end for that extra stop, and with internal zooming.
@stephenbrasure4331 2 жыл бұрын
I have the 40-150 2.8 Pro and bought it for nature/wildlife photography. I wouldn't replace it with the new f/4 model as I do use the MC20 teleconverter. But, I could see getting the new model lens for those times when I'm "sightseeing" or want to travel light as the new version is so much lighter. Because of the weight of the 2.8 version, I have the plastic fantastic f/4-5.6 version for when I need it. And....beautiful snowfall and it was great to see the cross country skiers in the background at the beginning of the video! Thanks for the review!
@eamonnshanahan 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Peter, thanks for the video. For me, the only possible disadvantage is the lack of a manual clutch. It is the size of the lens which attracts me. As you said, this complements the 12-45mm and 8-25mm f4 Pro lenses, which I already have. I have an order in with Conn's in Dublin for this lens as well as the OM-1.
@byronservies4043 2 жыл бұрын
I really like the f4 series of lenses because of their size. I would handle most of the missing features and would happily switch, but incompatibility with the teleconverters is rough. I use one with my 2.8 pro a lot. I will have to think about that carefully, as well as whether I want to switch to the OM-1. The light weight is very important to me. I often carry my E-M5m3 because it is so light
@davidblack2632 2 жыл бұрын
Great video about the new 40-15/4.0 lens. I got the 40-150/2.8 and really love it. It is one of my most used lens. I got the 40-150/4.0 on pre-order. I can see myself doing a kit with the 12-40/2.8 and the 40-150/4.0 with couple of fast primes like the 20/1.4 and the 45/1.2. Another possible kit is the 8-25/4.0, the 40-150/4.0 and the two fast primes. Still, I am keeping the 40-150/2.8 lens for event photography. It is so nice having so many great choices. Yes, I do miss the Ln Function button, the Manual Clutch and not being able to take the teleconverters. Still not enough for me not to get the lens.
@asdaf42 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review of the lens. Can't wait to see the comparison between this and the 2.8 - at the moment I'm planning to go for the 2.8 - in combination with the 12-40 I have all what I need (as you mentioned). Fast primes I have already.
@hnahler 2 жыл бұрын
It's very tempting for size and weight. I do a lot of outdoor photography on long hikes. However, I do have the f/2.8 version and the 1.4x extender. While not my main genre, I enjoy using that combo for shooting birds from time to time, something that will be a real challenge with the f/4: no extender and a real issue in those early morning hours where you can best capture birds. - Yes, if I did not have a lens in this range or only the M.Zuiko 40-150, I would consider buying this lens. - However, now, I would have to trade in my f/2.8 + extender and probably still be out of pocket to get the f/4. That doesn't sound like a good deal. - I think, I would miss the versatility of the f/2.8 + extender I got used to.
@g10col92 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review. Yes I'm going to buy this lens. Keeping the weight of my camera bag down. My camera bag will have the EM5 camera and the 12-45 f4 and the 40-150 f4 lenses. If I'm in need of a prime - they are so small and compact I think I will take the 25mm and 45mm f1. 8 lenses.
@klaaslangendoen4613 2 жыл бұрын
I started out with the 14-150 and still use it because of the size for traveling light. Updated to 45-150 2.8 a couple of years ago.
@rowanstrang8072 2 жыл бұрын
Ive been eyeing up the 40-150 2.8 for a while now. This lens for the reduced size and weight seems like a much better option for my uses
@MrFirstdance2000 2 жыл бұрын
If it had the IBIS and the MF clutch, I might be tempted. The beauty of the pics of the Pro F2.8 version is hard to replace . The F4 doesn't bother me in the least as I have the 12-100mm and its wonderful. Thank you for this wonderful review, sir!!
@johnmiller6108 2 жыл бұрын
I was considering this lens but with no extender it is a no go. Thanks for the review and for saving me some money
@DeMorcan 2 жыл бұрын
This and the 8-25/4 make a perfect combination to me. Instead of a focus clutch, I have a button my thumb hits for manual. I can also peak auto focus manually. I have a 2 camera harness and use primes indoors. So, I do not need the 2.8s. The weight is ideal for me for hiking and my chemo damaged body. I with I could use a 1.4X with it. Still, having 15-300 available as I am shooting covers my general photography, Longer is special use and I can take another lens for that. I will be buying it. The fact the OM1 is two stops better, losing 1 stop to a 2.8 still leaves me 1 stop better than the 2.8 and EM1III. With the f/4s and the OM1 I save money over the EM1IIIs and 2.8 zooms. The synergy of OM Systems means I am buying cameras and lenses again.
@k6usy 2 жыл бұрын
I will get one of these eventually, I already have the F2.8 Pro.
@ttbirds1082 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review. If it supported the 1.4x teleconverter to give an option of 56-210mm f/5.6 then it would have been a very easy decision to buy. However I think the Olympus15-150mm f/4-5.6ii and the 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 are viable compact and light alternatives for outdoors use.
@sstansm7f 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Peter! What a weather for photography in our corner of the planet - whole February as in lightbox. I would like to move Laplandia may be there's some sun over there.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
Yes the sky is the biggest soft box in the world. Very soft light.
@JensMHA Жыл бұрын
The f:4 OM s line-up is probably the only lenses one would need for General Purpose Photography, mix in one or two of the f:1.8 primes to taste and GTG. That said, I have probably more lenses than what is good for me, most of the Lumix, which is what I primarily shoot with, even though I have a tiny collection of Olympus gear, and am pondering off-loading the GX9 to get a OM-d10 MkIV after getting a 10$ MkII with the back screen issue.
@stevebonn3463 2 жыл бұрын
If I were just starting out with micro 4/3, this might be a nice option for me. At this point, I have a variety of lenses that cover the same range.
@bosamuelsson5814 2 жыл бұрын
The focus length is what I like. But, as You Peter I already have 40- 150 f 2,8. In my smal shoulderbag for traveling, I have a Olympus m10 markIV, 12-40 f2,8 and the 40-150 f2, 8 and panasonic 25 mm F1,7. It is small and light bag to Carry.
@walterbulyga2588 Жыл бұрын
have it love it
@ruthvey-herdalot9842 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Peter, thank you for this interesting review, seems to be a an alternative for those who like light weight. Myself, I own the 40-150 mm 2.8 and am pretty lucky with it. I don't find it to heavy and aslo can use the procapture mode handheld - as long as there is enough light. As allrounder I have the 12 to 100 mm 4.0 which als is a very fine lens.
@ridealongwithrandy 2 жыл бұрын
Yep, I think the 12-100 f4 along with this 40-150 f4 is a nice match.
@rikeson1402 2 жыл бұрын
@@ridealongwithrandy in addition to the 12-100/4,0 I would like to have a 75-300/4,0 or a 100-400/4,0 with IS and L-FN button
@Smoothblue90 2 жыл бұрын
I want one. I've not been interested in the 12-100mm, but I'm going to get one of these.
@stephenjones9246 2 жыл бұрын
Another useful review Peter, thanks. This lens is perfect for me, I have the small 12, 17 and 75mm primes but sometimes miss out on shots where a longer lens is required, or settle for a less than ideal crop. I considered the f2.8 but its too big, heavy and expensive for my needs, this f4.0 pro ticks all of the boxes.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@billweir4801 2 жыл бұрын
This fills a gap in the 40-150mm telephoto line up. The Olympus 4-5.6 was marginal in image quality and the focus motor failed on my lens. The 2.8 is too heavy for my mainly outdoor use. I now use the Panasonic 35-100mm F2.8, which is high quality and weather resistant, but lacks the reach of a 150mm and can have slow focus on Olympus EM-1 cameras, especially at close distances. Currently I am undecided between my Panasonic and the new OM F4 lens. Thank you for the review!
@arainmk 2 жыл бұрын
I have the 12-40 1nd 40-150 mZuiko lenses. The first lense I plan to buy is a fast wide prime, probably a Sigma 16mm f1.4, then something in the 300-400mm range.
@kidlatazul 2 жыл бұрын
I really like the manual focus clutch too. But there's a simple and efficient workaround: use back-button focus and S-AF+M or C-AF+M focusing modes. I've found this works fine with the 100-400 mm Olympus lens (it also does not have the manual focus clutch) when for example there's a bird perched behind leaves or branches--I use back button autofocus to get close, and if it doesn't completely focus on the bird I adjust the focus manually with the focus ring. It's little difference from using the manual focus clutch. I appreciate this review. I'm planning a bucket-list trip to Yellowstone Park in September and expect to spend a lot of time walking, including a 16-mile round-trip hike and overnight stay camping at a lake. I'm considering buying this lens to take with me.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
That is a good way to do it if there is no MF Clutch.
@jeroen2082 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome snow in Finland. To bad we (the Netherlands) didn't had any this year. Nice hands on. Seems like a great lens but I think I like my 40-150 f/2.8 to much to trade in.
@photohounds 2 жыл бұрын
I'll keep my 2,8. Bought it 6 years ago, as soon as I could. I've never looked back.
@itsmealex9290 2 жыл бұрын
I definitely prefer the f/2.8 lens. I want the lower depth of field. If you have enough light f/4 for birds is all right. For bigger animals like dogs, roes or horses I personally prefer f/2.8.
@gerrymac5865 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Peter thanks for this review very in depth as always, the price of this lens may make it out of range to some people especially when you can buy other Olympus lens with similar range.
@joanantonim.p.2400 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks , Peter... 👌👍👍🙏 I like more the M.Zuiko 12-45 f/4 PRO ... and with the Panasonic-Lumix 100-300 ED II f/4-5.6 or M.Zuiko 100-400 f/5-6.3 ... for the Olympus E-M1X ... 👌👍👍 , but this one is also good... , I don't mind the 25 fps limit on f/4 lenses... with the E-M1X I don't usually go over 10 fps... Greetings... "Saludos... 👋🙋😃 "
@Luuk_M 2 жыл бұрын
Don't forget to mention the ordinairy lens hood, in contrast to the sophisticated and easy to use (though somewhat fragile) pull-out lens hood of the 2.8 version. The manual focus clutch of the 2.8 includes hard stops, these I would definitely miss. So for me no reason to trade in the 2.8.
@alfredmartinezifernandez9644 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice landscapes in Finland! One interesting video it could be compare the depth of field of 14-150mm f4-5.6, 40 - 150 f4 and 40 - 150 f2.8 at the minimum focal distance. I remenber that the 14 - 150 f4 5.6 has 50 cm in m.f.d.
@alangauld6079 2 жыл бұрын
I use the "DoF" button on my EM1 for manual focus so don't care about the MF clutch which I never use. Likewise the LF button. But I do wish it supported the teleconvertors. That would have been the icing on the cake. But I'm definitely interested as a replacement for my Lumix 45-175 that I currently use. Glad to see the review, all the focus has been on the OM1 but this is much more interesting to me.
@another.places 2 жыл бұрын
I know it's cold, but I don't know why I was breathing just like I was with you at the place. Nice video and I think the price is slightly expensive. 799e maybe fine
@hughjohns9110 Жыл бұрын
Having tried this lens for a while now, while it is optically certainly very good I wish they had made it a smaller version of the f2.8 Pro (MF clutch, LF button and to take t/c). Or made the focal length range longer (say 40-200 @ f4), it's smaller than it needs to be.
@jcurtis4082 2 жыл бұрын
This didn't talk me out of my 2.8. But I might be interested in a 2.8 update. #lenscoatings Thank you for the review. Well done as always.
@craig_m_mi 2 жыл бұрын
If you need to have the extender ability, and a manual focus clutch, and an LN function button, then you need the f/2.8 version. If they added in the clutch ring and the LN button, and added the ability to use extenders, then it gets bigger, heavier, and more expensive than it is. And it is, this version bits nice in between the 4.5-5.6 version and the way bigger 2.8 version. All these new products that fit nice in a lineup to add a lot of options are great and we shouldn't really tell these manufacturers they should have added X and Y and Z.
@wendyforsey7451 2 жыл бұрын
I have pre-ordered this lens, but I do wish it could use the extenders. I would have accepted a heavier and more expensive lens with that ability.
@steventhomas231 2 жыл бұрын
This looks like a fantastic addition to the range and the extra stop at the long end over the plastic 40-150 is really handy. Im a little disappointed you cant use this lens with teleconvertor but the bigger issue is the price is very high at launch.
@samson40a 2 жыл бұрын
I think the price is ok. When I used Nikon I couldn’t afford the 70-200 2.8 so I bought the F4 version. This also couldn’t use a tc but the price at the time was less than £1000 so this OM lens appears to be a bargain in comparison
@steventhomas231 2 жыл бұрын
@@samson40a there's a heck of a lot more glass on the Nikon f4 lens though. And the subject isolation which can be a desired aspect of a fast telephoto on full frame comparing the two is significantly greater. Not really an exact comparison.
@samson40a 2 жыл бұрын
@@steventhomas231 must admit I did like that lens.
@lassetegenborg9567 2 жыл бұрын
I've preorded one. I got the 40-150 f4-5.6 and the problem with that is the missing weather and temperature sealing. The 40-150 f2.8 is to large and heavy for me. So this new lens would be a good compromize.
@don234561 2 жыл бұрын
If it had the manual clutch then I would seriously consider it. I have the 12-40mm F2.8, and I love it, but I cannot get on with the manual focusing on the 100-400. I'm not too bothered by the frame rate, or the extender issue. I'll stick with the 40-150 F4-F5.6 for the moment.
@ajwillshire 2 жыл бұрын
I think this is a miss for me, sadly. I bought the 12-100 as my "do everything" lens (within reason) plus the 8-25 because I love wide-angle shots and was spending some time on a sailing ship where there's a limit in how far you can step back! But on occasion, even switching between those two was a little bit of a chore, worth it only for a very particular shot. I've also got the L-Fn button set up to activate the digital teleconverter which is really useful (obviously just affects the JPGs, not the RAWs but good for getting the shot). The main issue is that the jump from 100-150 really isn't that much - (from roughly 10 degrees field of view to 7, I think), and the bottom end is much more restricted than the 12. Add to that not being able to work with the teleconverter and it simply doesn't add sufficient range to make it worth swapping lenses (unlike 12mm - 8mm, where we go from roughly 73 degrees FOV to 96). Alternatively, if it worked with the TC, it would be worth keeping them together almost all the time to give me a 56-200 or a 80-300 option to switch to (even if f8 would be quite dark a lot of the time). If I had only the 12-40 f2.8 or the 12-45 f4, then yes, it makes perfect sense to add this. But not at all if you have the 12-100. Hopefully one of the unspecified new telephotos that are on the lens roadmap from September 2021 will be a useful pairing with the 12-100. A pro version of the 75-300, for example, would be amazing, and a good option for those of us who really can't justify the £6,500 for the 150-400 f4.5. I would also miss the MF clutch - with it being absent on both this and the 20mm 1.4, I'm worried that OMDS are moving to get rid of it altogether on new lenses. I really hope not, as it's a great feature.
@weixiong1.0 2 жыл бұрын
Love your hat! Do the tentacles spread out when you spin? If so, you can do a slow mo shot with that to show the quality of higher frame rates.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
I will do that!
@lindadee2053 2 жыл бұрын
This 40-150 f/4 looks and sounds like a very good and useful lens, but it’s not inexpensive. For us amateurs and enthusiasts, the f/3.5 to 5.6 can be had for as little as $99 at times. At that price point, I would call it an excellent buy and a decent lens as well. Of course, it won't match up to the two Olympus PRO versions, but it actually has quite decent IQ for such an inexpensive, basic zoom lens and very nice color rendition also. As for bokeh, at the longer zoom lengths the depth of focus is quite shallow for almost any decently constructed lens so reasonable background separation is not that difficult to achieve either. Just thought I'd mention these aspects of the slowest 40-150mm since you didn't have that lens for any comparisons. In a pinch, I think even a professional photographer would find that inexpensive M.Zuiko lens usable. Bottom line - for $99 it's a "great" lens, too.
@rpdee7344 2 жыл бұрын
2/26/22 Are the Pro lens good and sharp, Yes, but for my photo needs the Olympus kit lenses meet my needs as far as image quality and sharpness. Even when I shoot with film cameras a lot of the zoom lenses purchased were not from the camera of the manufacturer, but companies like Tamron, Sigma. The photos I take either with film or digital no one ever asked me what lens I use to take a photo, but judged me on the contents of the photo. Some of our greatest photographers that are remembered to this day used lenses that were not even close to what can be made with the use of AI today, but the pictures today are still as good as any digital ones because we judge on content, not how much you paid for a lens. No need to be chasing the latest and greatest, cause it what's behind the viewfinder that makes or breaks a great photo.
@afallfromgrace 2 жыл бұрын
For me, I can't do without the 2X converter which doesn't fit this one. Plus, I love using the collar as a grip.
@jazzcats1000 2 жыл бұрын
I for one don't miss a MF clutch. The AF+MF mode works just as well I find. What I find unfortunate is a lack of teleconverter support. It would be nice if OMDS were to make one that works with the f4 series.
@RobertVE3VPL 2 жыл бұрын
I will almost certainly replace my Panasonic 35-100/f2.8 with this lens. I need the extra reach more often than the extra speed. I don't care about the missing L-Fn or MF clutch. Being able to use existing extenders would have been nice but not that big a deal. Being "only" able to handle 25 fps is a non-issue to me.
@demarestk 2 жыл бұрын
An em5 mkiii + 12-45 f4 + 40-150 f4 + 20 f1.4 could make my ideal travel kit...
@berntlie6799 2 жыл бұрын
The size and weight makes the lens tempting. Still, I love the 2.8 version. Maybe I'm a chicken, but I always have a protective filter on my lenses. I guess this removes any advantage of the protective coating on the front element...
@irishrose89775 2 жыл бұрын
Only thing I’m a bit disappointed in with this lens is inability to use extenders! If it’s a pro lens you should be able to use the extender!
@libork8106 2 жыл бұрын
I do have the 2.8 version, however the focus clutch is a deal-breaker for me. Often I do need quickly tweak focus and to go to menu change the setting maybe too late. Otherwise it looks like pretty good lens.
@WMedl 2 жыл бұрын
Manual focus by wire can be done without going to the menu by setting S-AF+MF or C-AF+MF and setting the focus mode to MF autofocus can be used with back butto. focus.
@cliffterpher 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Peter!
@Molybdan42 2 жыл бұрын
I have the F4 - 5.6 version of this lens so this one is very interesting for me. But 900 Euro is steep when you can get the 2.8 version for around 1100 - 1200 euro...
@lvcc560 2 жыл бұрын
It does seem like a great lens but I will not be getting it due to getting the 2.8 last year. It's just so sharp and having constant 2.8 is great for someone who lives in one of the most consistently overcast regions in north america. Also having the ability to use the 1.4x and 2x teleconverters with it is a big plus- especially the 1.4x since there's virtually no degradation in image quality and sharpness. The weight of the 2.8 does not bother me, however when the 2x is mounted, it becomes noticeably heavier than the Panasonic Leica 100-400. I will probably be selling the 2x soon because of this and the softness it can often times bring to the image.
@klackon1 2 жыл бұрын
Mine is on pre order and the OMD Solutions website is still showing this lens is compatible with 50 fps. I used to own a 40 - 150mm f2.8 but part exchanged it for a PanaLeica 200mm f2.8 + TC14. I will be using my new 40 - 150mm f4 in ProCapture mode for large insects landing/taking off. The 200mm is a bit too restrictive and the 40 - 150mm f2.8 a bit heavy for handholding in ProCapture. The 40 - 150mm f4 will be just right for me. On insect days I will use it side by side with my 60mm f2.8 and birding days side by side with my 300mm f4.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
I know that it says that. I checked from OMDS and they said that it is not. They also say that they will fix it.
@klackon1 2 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter. Thanks for the update. I will be speaking to an OMD Solutions representative at my local camera shop on 4th March. He will be demonstrating the OM1 and the new lenses.
@Hichem-yp2cl Жыл бұрын
The 40-150/4 is a great lens but is the aperture enough for concerts? (the 40-150 2.8 is heavy and bulky)
@bamsemh1 2 жыл бұрын
Aside from the focal length, which do you find most pro? That one or the 12-100mm? And quality wise.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
There is no difference, both lenses feels really pro.
@WMedl 2 жыл бұрын
That is the third OM pro lens without an MF clutch! A real deterioration and a bad sign for the future. The MF clutch enables in lens focusing with defined focus positions on the ring and no frickeling endless turns when doing "manual focusing" by wire. The incompatability with the teleconverters may be due to the f/4 (should have been left to the users) but I assume besides cost reasons it may be the plastic body not enduring the manipulation twith the TC for a longer time...
@robertfrank9168 2 жыл бұрын
If the lens would allow MC that would be a nice choice. But without I stay with my Oly 14-150.
@sebastiaanvanwater 2 жыл бұрын
Peter looks very festive. Or maybe it's winter hat. Anyway, about the lens, the lack of focus clutch is most unfortunate and it's pricey, especially compared the 40-150 f4-5.6 and not that fast for the price. :/
@PatsKaltas 2 жыл бұрын
I have 12-45 f4, so I am thinking 40-150 f4, but still not decided regarding price. Also no idea about availability in my country.
@roopa4294 Жыл бұрын
I was hoping that an extender can be used on this lens, I am buying it for its smaller and lighter weight. Will the extenders can be used in the future?
@ForsgardPeter Жыл бұрын
Most likely not.
@rockitdude 8 ай бұрын
I have the 12-45 f/4, so I get the appeal of the small size/weight of the 40-150 f/4. This could be my next lens purchase. I don't have a lens with focus clutch so I won't miss it. I don't get it, though; I have set up C1 for AF+MF, and additionally, my C2 mode is exclusively MF, which can get overridden by the autofocus button. So what's the need for the focus clutch, at least for still photography?
@ForsgardPeter 8 ай бұрын
That is a good work around. MF Clutch is handy and faster. Hand is around the lens anyways no need to move the hand. If you assign the C1 to C2 switch to a button it makes good way.
@EarlyBirdJP 2 жыл бұрын
Does it work with Pro-capture and in-camera-focus-stacking features?
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
Yes and Yes.
@binky2301 Жыл бұрын
For a hobby photographer would you recommend this lens over a 14-150 f4.0-5.6? I'm tempted but not sure I can justify the cost (tho I can get a really good deal brand new...) I don't shoot in the rain! Are the images that much better? I just upgraded to an OM-1 as a treat.
@ForsgardPeter Жыл бұрын
This is a better lens than 14-150mm, but it is not as versatile. Here is a video about the 14-150mm: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bZt1aZSd1rGukX0.html
@binky2301 Жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter As I'm a fairly unskilled hobbyist who understands the basics, do you think I'd be wasting my money? I meant to ask, am I likely to notice that much difference in image quality without pixel peeping?
@geofff6671 Жыл бұрын
This lens, while attractive as a travel lens, is very high priced for what it is. Normally f4 zooms are about half the price of f2.8 equivalents. This one is about 75 per cent of the f2.8 version. It also lacks a number of features such as no manual focus clutch, no function button, and collapsible design which slows one down. I’m interested but it would have to be quite a bit cheaper. Nice hat btw. Did you lose a bet😀?
@ForsgardPeter Жыл бұрын
No, I have had for a long time.
@Hashbrown37 2 жыл бұрын
Not being able to use the MC14 or MC20 teleconverters is the main downside. Are there plans for new teleconverters?
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
I have no idea if they are making new extenders.
@makarovss Жыл бұрын
Hi, could this lens bi used with 2x converter?
@ForsgardPeter Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately no.
@samson40a 2 жыл бұрын
Looks like it comes with a hood 👍
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
Yes it does.
@chetanunindracusin664 2 жыл бұрын
Great len but for meI just sit around my car taking picture so I had 40-150 2.8 +mc14 and mc20 is more than enough thank
@freddyBeatrijs23 Жыл бұрын
I usually use a UV filter on all my lenses. More of a habit I've been doing for years to protect my lenses. But ask me if this is still necessary with modern lenses. Especially if nowadays you only have to dry the front of your lens during rain or something. (fluorine coating etc...) So do I assume that the coating of an OM System lens is more resistant to the influence of nature? Nowadays, doesn't the use of a UV filter like I used to do detract from the quality of your lens?
@ForsgardPeter Жыл бұрын
I theory an UV-filter will affect the IQ. How much depends on the quality of the filter. The new flourine coating is very good. I would rely on that unless there some other reason you need to protect the lens.
@ianbrowne9304 2 жыл бұрын
G'day Peter, have you done a review for 24-100 f4 lens ?
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
I have an old review of the 12-100mm f4 Pro: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZpOkmt2UqZ_df6c.html
@ianbrowne9304 2 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter Thank you --- am really hoping you said it's a really bad idea so I my current ideas become really bad ideas :lol: .
@DragonfireRC 2 жыл бұрын
I was hoping they would replace the old 4/3 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 with a new 50-200mm f/3.5 or f/4 constant aperture with IS that supports Olympus Sync IS. This lens does not excite me, it should at least support the 1.4x TC at minimum.
@troporobo 2 жыл бұрын
I had the non-pro 40-150 and hated it (poor IQ and build quality) and Now have and love the Pro 40-150 f2.8. I would love the smaller and lighter form factor of the f4.0 compared to the f2.8 lens, but the stabilization and MF deficiencies make this one a non-starter. Nevertheless, thanks for the review!
@shaun5893 2 жыл бұрын
I think they missed the boat not making this lens compatible with the teleconverters. I can't see myself buying this when I have the 12-100 f4 PRO. Just not enough long end to make it worth it. Too bad it's not a compact 50-200 f4 PRO...
@jakobsoegaard1886 2 жыл бұрын
I Think it is a huge shame it does not have stabilized build in to the lens like the 12-100 and the 2.8 big brother. F4 is a slow lens and an extra stop stability would be great
@stephanarts3803 2 жыл бұрын
Actually, a TC would also drop it down to an f/5.6 or f/8. They have several other zooms that would fit that range better.
@DragonfireRC 2 жыл бұрын
@@stephanarts3803 The 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro does not have stabilization either, only the 12-100 f/4 Pro IS does.
@christianmayrhofer4178 2 жыл бұрын
Does it have internal zoom or does it extend like the 40-150mm 4.0-5.6? Too bad you didn't show that.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
Yes it does.
@lensman5762 2 жыл бұрын
I am interested in this lens quite a lot, but not at the current asking price of £799.00 in the UK. Ridiculous.
@samanimeguy23 2 жыл бұрын
Any news about a new OMS macro lens?
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
Not anything new. The 100mm macro is in the lens roadmap, but no idea when it is launched.
@hauke3644 2 жыл бұрын
The cheap 40-150/4-5.6 or the Lumix 35-100/4-5.6 show how small a tele zoom can be, so I find this lens a little too big. Of course we have to take in account the constant aperture and better image quality, especially on the long end. Together with the 8-25 this gives a compact and versatile setup. Usually I would not buy a pro lens without the mf clutch, which I need for video, but this might not be the right gear for that kind of assignments anyway. The lf-n button is a mixed bag: very useful, if all lenses had it, useless otherwise, because I can’t assign anything important to that button. Another lack: Panasonic shows that even small lenses can have image stabilization that adds to the ibis, especially for telephoto. Under the bottom line: I will not buy this lens. I’ll wait for a new 50-200/2.8-3.5 with mf clutch and lf-n button.
@jasonspitzer1503 2 жыл бұрын
The MF clutch is essential for me. I'll stick with the 2.8
@johncarder819 2 жыл бұрын
The lack of an MF clutch is a deal-breaker for me, as is the inability to work with the extenders.
@AhmadThabet-qw1kc 2 жыл бұрын
Lack of MF clutch is a big disadvantage and also the extenders. The lens lacks the built in image stability in the lens like the 20-100 mm F4 Pro Lens.
@JalanKesini 2 жыл бұрын
I even got Older 40-150mm for Four Thirds with the adapter for M43 mount. It create nice image, just slow in focus.
@bergkamp429 2 жыл бұрын
No IS would be a draw back?
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
That would be good in longer lenses.
@Lordvader330 2 жыл бұрын
I shoot a lot of birds. I need the MC extenders. That's a deal breaker for me.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
That is a pity that it does not take extenders.
@formermpc10 2 жыл бұрын
Peter, you should be glad you don't have the $99 version. If that's the only lens one can afford maybe they need another hobby. I don't plan to buy this lens, as I have enough lenses that cover this range. The price seems reasonable.
@AlpacoFilms 2 жыл бұрын
I’m so surprised this can’t do 50fps! I was really hoping it could do that!
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
It is a pity that it cannot.
@sstansm7f 2 жыл бұрын
You can film 50 or 60 fps with it anyway - it just can't focus per each individual frame.
@AlpacoFilms 2 жыл бұрын
@@sstansm7f yea, I understand that, the AF/AE at 50fps is really useful. But 25tps isn’t too bad. Just surprised as it’s a PRO lens. I assumed all the PRO labeled products would be able to use all functions to its full extent.
@itsmealex9290 2 жыл бұрын
If you really need the 50fps, take the f/2.8 version😉
@AlpacoFilms 2 жыл бұрын
@@itsmealex9290 you know, I complained about the size of the 2.8 a whole lot but I didn’t realize how cheap it can be found in the used market. This might have to be the route to go and just suck it up regarding size!
@freddyBeatrijs23 2 жыл бұрын
I looked for whether focus staking (in camera) was also possible with this lens but found this nowhere. After inquiring with OM system, I was told that focus staking directly in the camera with this lens was not possible Nevertheless, it is also a PRO lens here Regret this
@frankvrba6247 2 жыл бұрын
I think I would really miss the MF clutch. I already have the older 40 - 150 Pro so I wouldn't buy it anyway.
@charlescook4248 2 жыл бұрын
I do not see a great advantage over the 12-100 f4.
@ForsgardPeter 2 жыл бұрын
They are a different lenses for different purpose. 40-150mm f4 gives you extra reach and the 12-100mm f4 gives you extra on the wider end.
@klaustomasini 2 жыл бұрын
For a Pro lens and its pricing it should have a clutch. The 12-100 f4 Pro has the clutch, so, why not this one.
@keithholland4322 2 жыл бұрын
I think this lens is way overpriced. You can get a used 40-150 f/2.8 for considerably less than that. It seems kind of crazy to assign a professional price to such a lens since the only use I can think of that a professional would have for such a lens is studio portrait photography with backdrops and strobes. If that is all you're doing with it, I guess it makes sense to have the lighter weight f/4 version and if you're using a studio backdrop, that's about where you want to be in terms of depth of field. However, for sports or wildlife photography, you will be much better served by the f/2.8 version since it gets you an extra stop of light and is compatible with teleconverters. What could be a useful addition to their collection of f/4 lenses is a 200mm f/4 that is compact, lightweight, professionally sharp, weather sealed, and compatible with teleconverters. That could be the perfect wildlife lens to take on a long, strenuous hike (with a pair of teleconverters, of course) and also a great tool for parents wanting to photograph their kids soccer and football games without spending big bucks on a Pana/Leica 200mm f/2.8 or 50-200mm f/2.8-4. I would love to have such a lens when I'm hiking. Usually when I go for a long hike, I'm primarily planning to do landscape photography, so I'll bring along the 12-100mm f/4 and the Pana/Leica 8-18mm f/2.8-4, but it's nice to have a longer lens for wildlife. Currently, I'm using the Panasonic 100-300 for that, but a pro quality prime lens that is sharp, compact, lightweight, and compatible with teleconverters would be much better. If Olympus made a 200mm f/4, I would keep it on my camera with a 1.4x teleconverter whenever I'm hiking or cycling to be able to grab some quick photos if I see some interesting wildlife while keeping a wider lens or two in the bag for landscapes.
D Griff Gallery: Micro Four Thirds Photography
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Guido Van De Water
Рет қаралды 12 М.