the ball is to far to get to.. the racket throw was intentional

Yeah, thats my guess. And I think the other player should let the umpire decide.

it doesn't matter if she didnt mean to hit the ballboy she intentionally threw the rachet therefore should of been disqualified.

The empire lol

So if I get a gun and fire it in to a crowd of people but not aiming for anyone should I be punished? I wasn't intentionally trying to hit anyone.

+Anoop Kumar She didn't want a point penalty. She wanted the opponent to lose the entire match!

+Anoop Kumar Exactly my thoughts! She put up more of a stink about it than the ballboy did! She couldn't give two shits about if the ballboy was ok. She wanted an easy win and that's pathetic.

+Anoop Kumar She's just a big drama queen. I mean she almost cried on the court. WTF!!!

+Anoop Kumar So true>>>>

Ball kids aren't allowed to say she threw it at the unless it is obvious because it will look bad

Came out worst?? She won. I don't even watch tennis anymore or know either one of these

@@micheleh5269 That’s obviously not what he means smh

fact!

Tell that to the Chinese player the other day.

People get hit 15x worst in sports allll the time , dont be a lil sissy.

She's a trash ball

There was harm, and that was a foul. She didnt even apologize

@@TygerHillis She gave an apologetic wave. Is that not good enough where you're from? Does she have to grovel at his feet for it to be a proper apology?

@@chaosPneumatic yes. Yes, she does.

@@TygerHillis Just how soft are you, then?

so true :')

Exactly!

Completely wrong. She wanted the right call to be made. The shock it wasn't, caused her to lose control and forget she isn't the judge. It was all emotions. Not tactics.

Tayden I bet she was spoiled as a child. Did you see her rubbing it in her face at the end of the match. Poor sportsmanlike conduct by both of them. Millennials...

Ya I feel the same

Thanks i wouldnt have looked that up. I feel redeemed. Broady was clearly the disgraceful one.

Short term gain long term loss. You can def see her attitude won’t make her a champ. She’s the nick kygrios of female tennis

@@arung7205 nick is far far super talented than her ...do charity works and have a tennis foundation...its just his mental temper things those leads him to shitty path.

D. R. It really has been a long time but, the attitude is very important. Your opponent has made a mistake but that reaction is disgraceful. That is what I wanted to point out . And also where you end up with the wrong competitiveness...

Kagan Çetin rankings dont say annything... throw a racket at a ballboy/girl in my club... auto DQ.....

Who cares it's an accident. He's a boy , he's fine.

Boys don't need to be made sure we're ok from mama

@@jamesc8709 rules are rules simple as she should have been disqualified otherwise you open the gate for every player to claim it was an accident when they throw their racket or hit the ball in aggression in someones direction

​@@jamesc8709eat shyt

​@@jamesc8709seriously..eat shyt

Well duh. Welcome to the world of sports. You get any advantage you can get.

HilzGaming she won anyway so fuck off.

she stinks

She is british thats why.. all brits are greedy af and will do whatever it takes to win

Cheers for generalising mate, no true sportsman would want to win because of this but of course since she’s British she wants to because she’s greedy. What a tosser

Exactly

Dave Olly Just another idiot with an inferior complex over the British. ignore him

She threw her racket at the ballboy so there's no denying that she should of been DQ. She didn't mean to hurt him but it's gross disrespect. That ballboy is just doing a job. He isn't being paid to be disrespected like that. That said, Broady made herself look bad by making such a big deal out of it. She should of left the decision to those responsible for making these decisions.

Yeah, its the first time I hear about ostapenko

​@@teseu1763This is the first time I've heard of Broady.

​@@teseu1763she won the French open.........tf yall talking about

First time I heard about John McEnroe was cuz of his gross unprofessionalism. And he's a legend lmao

look at all the dumb men complaining about broady. Toxic masculiity at it's best

for the purple mini mini mini mini skirt

+Jonathan O'Brien true

cat scratch fever

lol, me too. No; not the purple skirt; the black skirt :)

I'm a simple man.....I see hot women in tiny skirts with nipples poking out, I click.

Lau Va 😁😁😁👍👍

Yupp

Different rules for men, we are held accountable

I saw her check.

@@ghostdance56 Not the player in pink.

The racquet hit the tarp first, that took the sting out of it, he was never going to be badly hurt.

It was obvious he was fine.

It amuses me how many people are ranting that "she doesn't care about the ball boy." Where does she claim she cares about the ball boy?? There are rules about throwing your racket, smashing your racket, arguing with officials etc that ALL players are subject too. She's arguing that ostapenko has committed a racket infringement, that is really serious, because it ended up hitting a ball boy. Do I think she should have argued about it so much and got distracted and emotional about it? No, she shouldn't have. But all this straw man bullshit that she's supposedly "pretending to care" about the ball boy is nonsense.

Accurate analysis.

The saddest part is that she won the match 😿

Broady is hardly the one to blame here, she have the right to call for Ostapenko to be disqualified.

@@Graziano45 she gave absolutely no concern to the ballboy who was hit with a racket. Her instincts were to try and win a tennis match instead of checking on the well being of a child. Very unprofessional in my opinion

@@philtaylor5592 Saidi is correct. Throwing the racket and hitting someone is enough for being disqualified. Broady, although she didnt give a toss about the boy, its not her concern. She was right to call this out.

Hahaha...so true

hahahah these comments are gold

Not really, She has a vested interest in seeing Ostapneko get disqualified.

epic dude. haha

Hahahah.. Very very true...

I def know they are gonna have a movie in the works! Called the racket

Fired from what exactly?

@@eaglewinnings8003 Just a jokey term mate, don't read too much into it.

Did you see what happened to Djokovic? He unintentionally kicked a ball and accidentally hit the lines woman, gets defaulted. It didn't slip her hand, she threw it out of frustration. Accidentally hits a ball boy. She should have been defaulted.

Yeah yeah look what happened with djokovici and he just hit a ball slowly that accidentaly hit the line refere... ostapenko is realy stupid if that raket hit the ballboy in the eye he can remain blind...

I agree! Makes you wonder how she is in general off the court as well.

how is it taking the low road? YOU'RE taking the low road by hoping she breaks her ankle. Grow up, little guy. This is professional sports, not mommy's backyard hand-holding session, feelings-circle, lets talk about our "trauma" and try to make everyone else pity us day on the swing set. Do you have any idea how much money is at stake here? Nobody gives a flying fuck about the ballboy. He was fine. Stop acting like he was mortally wounded.

The racket did not hit the ballboy, was cetainly close but the images show that It does not reach him. So it was very unfair and triky try to get a disqualification of her opponenent, like she did

Yes, she got emotional because she thought that was obvious that Ostapenko will be disqualified. It didn’t happen and that is why she almost cry 🤣

@@michelemasini569 ostepenko is always looking to twist rules or complain to get an advantage so it was karma.

@@yomo1690 dont you mean Brody? She was the one arguing with the umpire

@@doct0rnic I am saying that although Brody was the one moaning, Ostepenko is ALWAYS complaining and bending rules and shouting at umpires and taking unnecessary medical breaks to slow the action so the shoe was on the other foot.

😂

@@hirendrall7215 Nobody chocked and screamed here. That's the difference. That old lady exaggerated the scene. That's why he disqualified

😅 🤣

@@aruljebin she should've given an audition for Hollywood , man she would do great

nice one

Hahahaha

That's great

Who is Broady?

MEAN DA BUSH she was the one wearing pink

You win!

+Mick Rumping And if it were not for Broady, nothing would have happened to Ostapenko, meaning the rule that the tennis federation put in place meant NOTHING. When you see something wrong, you speak up!! That's how change is made and how progress is made. You DON'T look the other way...!

+dinh Broady didnt care about the ballboy's welfare. She only cared about weaseling her way into get the other girl disqualified.

***** It's trivial because rules are made for a reason. You can't just ignore it.

No one ignored rules. Ostapenko was penalized. This issue here is Broady's ugly, self-serving, self-righteous and dishonourable behaviour. Broady is disgraceful here. No class whatsoever.

+Mick Rumping you are completely right!! so many people ignore that

You have nothing to say about the player who threw her racket?

@@DrummerJacob Why do YOU give a fuck about why I asked a question? It seems YOUR life is the one that is 'empty', lol.

Sailor Man who cares she threw it out of frustration not out of rage or anger at another.

@@weston9106 The rule is that if you throw a racket and it strikes someone, you are disqualified regardless of intent. The umpire erred by not enforcing that rule.

She said it was an accident

@@DrummerJacob Dunno he does but it worked

@Sparka J fact

I do hate the "Nobody:" jokes a LOT!

@@youtubecommentpolice2043 So were other times when a player is disqualified. The wrong decision was made.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I agree. Normally, no player wants to win by default. To fight that hard for it is not a good look.

You think she cares whether you want to know about her or not. No one gives a shit about you mate. Hate to break it to you.

@@anti-tankartur677 He is just giving his opinion and tbh I don't think your any more relevant than he is.

no.

@@anti-tankartur677 and nobody cares what you think so stfu

Ostapenko asked if he was okay, you can see it in the slow motion

The ball boy was fine.

@@beardan76 not surprisingly, it was barely a throw she just sorta let it go

As it should be.

@@tsfbaf303 she purposely threw it tho. Both were wrong tho imo

erik g. Can u imagine mommy broady if ballboy forgets to take out the trash?

@@chadcunningham9240 The tears! Knocking on neighbors' door to tell of ballboy's treachery!

@@chadcunningham9240 brody’s face is going purple, welling up with tears😂

Huh? Adopted by Russell Westbrook?

You win the comments.

It didn't hit him directly, thankfully, from what I can see. But it did ricochet off the wall and onto him a little bit.

Looks like it grazed him

Of course simps like you would defend her

@@hashimhussain5566 She was angry. She threw her racquet. But not at the ballboy.

No one cares about the ballboy.

Exactly, people posting here have never played tennis before or know the rules. Intent doesnt matter, if you hit anyone with anything on a court you get the DQ, the end. Broady handled it poorly but she was right. If umpires let this shit slide anyone is free to hit an umpire or a ball kid and just say "woops, accident".

Yeah her hand in the air was a sign that she's an uncaring POS. Her reaction should have been running to him to make sure he was ok.

And Nole got disqualified but she didn't?? Where's the logic. She literally threw a whole RACKET on a ball boy and did not even care or ask if they were okay. While Nole hit one with a ball by accident and checked on them and everything, but still got disqualified 😐

@@grantmalone probably cause of the lack of sportsmanship? Could have been a lot worse and that woman that got hit ended up fine... What logic are you struggling with?

@@grantmalone What do you mean lol? Umpires literally give point penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct(i.e smashing racquets) all the time? Which, in reality, harms no one but the players' pockets. Do you watch tennis? "The woman ended up fine, the boy was fine throughout. " So why was the latter disqualified? Both were fine regardless. I'm actually struggling to understand your logic here

@@grantmalone And what exactly is the point of your previous post smartarse? Aren't you implying that the Djokovic situation is justified? Or you just making a "nothing" statement? "Badly hurt" she recovered in a few minutes, or like you said "ended up fine"...You realise enabling bad behaviour, regardless of what happened can lead to consequences in the future? And you didn't even take in what I wrote about umpires cause you're clearly a vain individual. I can see why you lurk here to insult people cause there's no way you can have conversation with other people. No, you can't help - you can barely help yourself. I'm out, peace

Karen's have had a name for a long time. If you ever worked in customer service/food you would know lol 😆👌

@@IsaacWolfOfficial no I'm not qualified to work there.

The Beatles Actually Karen’s have been present since the 70s as far as I can remember so probably even before that

Totally

B M-Y That’s probably true. The mindset of being a self entitled dick has always been a thing

What has that got to do with the deliberate throwing of her racket?

@@sailorman8668 it means that, just as if she hit the ball blindly in frustration and the ball went into the stands and hit someone. That's what u call an ACCIDENT.

@@1deonlucas9 If a player hits a ball into the stands full of people, why would it be surprising that a spectator would bet hit? The same with a thrown racket. There are dozens of people who are standing/sitting courtside - why would it be surprising if someone got hit by a thrown racket? In fact, we shouldn't be surprised at all, as someone WAS hit by the thrown racket. It's almost as if you don't think the player should have received any censure/penalty at all, for their reckless actions?

@@sailorman8668 I see your point. It's just that it seems obvious that it's not intentional. It's all about intent. The player hits a ball blindly out of frustration. You think the player is thinking "let me hit someone"? My point is that it was an accidental incident and not a big deal.

@@1deonlucas9 Indeed, the racket wasn't specifically thrown at the ballboy, but nevertheless, the racket was deliberately thrown, which should incur a default point for racket abuse, at the least. The reaction of the other player was ridiculous. Anybody would think that she was the one who was hit by the racket, lol.

It doesn't matter. Rules don't only apply for the top players. All those non top players are still fighting for rank and in turn sponsorship and media coverage. The other player threw - or released - her racket and it struck a ballboy in the shoulder. There should have been a penalty for that and not just a warning. Both of them look like Karens to me but Broady was right. They official went too easy on her. Other players in tennis did the exact same and were DQ'd, but she didn't even lose a point.

@@jcasetnl only question is who gives a fuck?! I just watched Sinner v Kyrgios in Miami, Sinner just went on with his business while Kyrgios went bat shit crazy. That’s a true champion right there, not someone who whines about how their opponent didn’t get disqualified. And from her record, it seems pretty obvious she did that to get a easy win

​@@jcasetnl I'm not sure why you responded with this. He didn't say anything about Osta or her not deserving a DQ.

She was playing to the rules. Upholdiing the rules in the sport is not bad behaviour.

@@beardan76 What the fuck are you talking about? What freaking rules? She tried to use an unfortunate event that hurt a ball boy to get an undeserved advantage in the game. She cried fake tears and displayed incredibly sportsmanlike behavior. Don't even try to defend her behavior.

@@darkaquatus auto DQ

@@beardan76 Exactly, how pathetic is that. Faking tears and putting up an entire act just to avoid having to compete with someone you apparently deem a superior player. Trying to cheat your way through. That's pretty much the definition of unsportsmanlike behavior. It's like a soccer player trying to get a penalty by dropping to the ground as soon as one of the opponents even touches him. Absolutely horrible.

Just keep women out of sport too emotional and they’re useless players anyway. Just put them up against men

***** I'm talking about players and their behaviour. The Seles incident is a completely different thing.

***** As I said, I was referring to the behaviour of players, and not to some knife stabbing maniac. "Pathetic" is not the first thing that comes to mind when I think about the Seles incident either btw, "terrifying" is more suitable. Now go troll elsewhere, I'm done feeding you.

agree robin, disgraceful and childish behaviour, crying and trying to get opponent disqualified. have zero respect for Broady

Well, I wouldn't say most pathetic seen I've seen on a tennis court, but certainly on that court. The way she BEGGED for help with the match by attempting to manipulate the situation should have gotten HER a misconduct penalty.

So she is being criticized for wanting the rules enforced. Are you serious?

nah she was correct. Novak got removed from the game for that type of incident

@@CDogBeast1992 and we all knew novak’s was really accidental and still he got DQed. Ostapenko should have gotten DQed. So fitting cause DQ also means Drama Queen

Lay off it was literally the one of the biggest matches of her career its tough for these players

Either way she was in the right

Broady won anyway and it's a clear disqualification.

She is

U mean bad girl? 😂

She is

huh????

She is a liar and a bully

Exactly. What a f***ing selfish drama queen. It was none of her business and obviously not her call. Not to mention that it was clear that however the boy was hit, there was clearly no significant injury. Ostapenko got a code violation which was entirely appropriate. Ridiculous and pathetic for an opponent to argue for a DQ. If you wanna make those calls, then become a chair ump.

Lol and she thought crying would get what she wanted

Not an easy way out. But fairness. It could have been her and she could have been penalised heavily. Of course we wouldn’t know if that will be the case, that’s why she wants fairness.

@@CountryCowboy008 fairness? It's not fair to petition the ump to DQ your opponent for an accident.

yeah, pathetic

maybe, but if you can get a free win and get paid for it, most would take that chance.

@@sfowler1100 which is why most people aren't true champions. most people are ordinary.

She was losing when it happened, though

Even as a viewer, I'd want to see this game forfeited. It would suck buying tickets to a canceled game. But there needs to be consequences for things like this.

It's WTA what do you expect

yup

+croydonrudeness Why would she?

+Rajeev Shrivastava exactly, but the way the media span the story was that she had somehow clearly targeted the ball-boy which it's obvious from the footage she did not.

+anmarks92 I agree, it's the portrayal of the incident which I objected to.

+croydonrudeness I agree she did not target the ball boy - but that was a very hard throw and she did it in a fit of anger and frustration. It showed reckless disregard for other people in the area. She's lucky that racquet did not hit the ball boy or worse yet fly over the wall and clobber a spectator. If that had happened I believe she would have been disqualified and justly sanctioned by the ITF

+croydonrudeness I doesn't matter what her intent was. She did NOT need to throw her racket, but if you hit someone you CAN be disqualified.

I wanted to slap that silly bitch to smithereens, too. What a stupid and OTT display of emotions. If you watch this half way (after the racket had been thrown) and only when Broady is talking to the referee, you may think that something have gone really wrong and she is incredibly upset over it.

Who cares, ostapenko will never win any GS either.

Thad Meister Ostapenko won Roland Garros.....

Thad Meister idiot

Really, who cares about Ostapenco? Spoiled and selfish. What can you expect?

A one HIT WONDER.

Me.

Me too and Broady was right!

Legit searched this video because of the Djokovic drama

With Đoković "it`s the rules", here they barely gave the code violation warning. Consistency. :)

Me 🙋🏻‍♂️

Do you know Matt Brody?

Hilarious. With a 2-10 slam singles record, she could use all the help she can get from her opponent

So pathetically high schoolish of her trying to get Ostapenko in trouble!

Haha so true!

To me Broady is the one to be negative here. Her try to convince the umpire Ostapenko intentionally hit the ball boy is pathetic, it's not her job to decide. She is so miserable.

At the playground

Name Watcher charissecoal is being sarcastic ... no need for you to call the person names

She had his baby and he threw a baseball bat at her.. 🍼🚼🚼🍼🍼🍼🚼🚼🚼🚼🚼🚼🚼🎾🎾🎾👶👶👶

I wouldn't say it was "sticking up" but more taking advantage tbh

I bet she banged him

+Raul Cercea she was trying to get the umpire to see that it wasn't an accident as the umpire wasn't go to punish Ostapenko for trowing the racquet. i know she wasn't aiming for the ballboy but still she shouldn't have thrown it and good on Naomi for stepping up for that ballboy who did get hit because that girl shouldn't have thrown the racquet so i agree with Naomi the girl needed to be penalised for it

+Jordan francis She clearly wasn't concerned about the ballboy's welfare. Her entire rant was about getting the other girl disqualified. Broady was shameful and dishonourable.

For example a few years ago a player was suspended for months because they hit a lines person with a ball. It wasn't intentional but it still happened and the player was punished.

Shane Terry you're making up stories. Send a link with your sources, idiot.

+00 00 www.inquisitr.com/887585/olga-puchkova-defaulted-after-hitting-line-judge-with-ball/ why would I make shit up? Idiot

Let me ask you something. Does e every engineer become the CEO of a company? No. Does every musician becomes world renowned? No. There are always players better than you but the main thing in a sport or in life is to survive. Broady is still surviving and it's going pretty well for her.

Grudo Yugin I like your insight and wisdom ... thanks for that !

So!! It does'nt give her the right to throw her racquet at the ballboy!

Willy Severus Dude, you’re wallowing in a causal fallacy like a toddler playing in his own shit. Ostapenko’s later tour success is not the result of her being the sort of twat who’d chuck a racquet at a ball boy and then lie about it.

@@nickadams1992 I don't think he is even saying that. It seems more generous to interpret him as taking joy in the irony.

But still she threw the racket intentionally……it was so wrong, and she should have been called out for that by the umpire

What other many big titles has Ostapenko won besides the French open you`re speaking of ?

@@Richardtv1968 Ostapenko threw her racket intentionally but she wasn`t aiming for the ball boy.

As opposed to throwing a temper tantrum like a child and throwing your racket?

"I would like the rules enforced please!"

naomi broadi the typical English character

OMG, I identify with your comment wholeheartedly, and what do ya know....66 likes to this comment (as I see it). I've been seeing that number pop up so much lately on meaningful things to me. It's eerie.

amisgohome, replace "English" with "black". In what way is your comment less racist?

@@bigglesworthof266 English isn't a race If the comment said "white people" then maybe it would be racist

Also add a French open title in ostapenko’s resume

exactly. Why is this relevant to the girl in pink AT ALL?

She always complains in her matches, shes weak minded if you ask me, always seeking easy wins over others.

exactly... I'm suprised the umpire didn't say to her get a grip women... or maybe he did

Doesn't matter the intent. Tim Henman was disqualified at Wimbledon when he unintentionally hit a ball kid with the ball after losing the point.

If the racquet had actually hit the ball boy, I would agree that she should be penalized, but it didn't.

Cry baby!

She was right. Sorry not sorry.

She was right, it's not just about her the lines people should not be treated like cannon fodder

@@paulatling8844 Accident bro, not cannon fodder, lol. Broady showed she's a real jerk.

@@roybaty7439 check the rules just because you are a top ranked player doesn't mean it's OK to randomly throw your racket around with any thought of the little people, yes the crying was over the top but I respect her sense of fair play. The umpires are there to apply the rules not show favoritism

Because she wants Osta disqualified and win by default. Not the best mentality

She was sad for the injured ballboy

lol

Lol! Nice

Oh thanks toronto

Nice one-love.

Ahhh Eddie, bloody NICE once!!! VERY bloody nice!