These panels are milestones in the history of science and are part of the paradigm shift that is already happening. Thank you so much, Deepak!

Thank you ❤🙏🏻

We need much more of these types of symposiums I am an Idealist and find that Kastrup can articulate and elucidate what I have instinctively felt all of my life that what we call reality is a dream world and the name of the game is to become lucid. The Materialist assumption is that its all in the brain but the medical findings of Dr John Lorber show this assumption is false.

sOME PEOPLE ARE NOT SKEPTICS OF THEIR OWN SKEPTICISM.

I disagree with Deepak's assertion that "they're not going to solve the hard problem tonight" since Bernardo has already solved it.

For those whose concept of communication is a game of one-upsmanship -- using skepticism for skepticism's sake masquerading as a demand for evidentiary "objective truth" -- the minimum criterion for what they will agree constitutes "evidence" is a moving target. They minimize, deprecate, or simply reject anything that they're unwilling to recognize. Their purpose in communicating is not to understand; rather, it is to win arguments. They're certain they're not confused or mistaken. "But here is this fact...", you say. Nope...that's not a fact, that's a "subjective opinion" -- their pseudo-civilized version of an _ad hominen_ attack. It's a tactic that handily sidesteps the truth that *_all_* facts -- indeed, everything we call _knowledge_ -- is ultimately subjective. Nothing can be known without a knower; nothing can be perceived without a perceiver; nothing can be observed without an observer. Apparently, they hope no one will notice that intellectual sleight of hand. Then they turn around and deny the very objectivity they were demanding by flip-flopping into an absurdity like, "You can't prove that I exist." Right. But that blows your demand for some kind of "objective proof " out of the water. You can't prove that I exist either, so why are you so adamant about arguing with someone you just made up? If you don't want to continue the discussion because either one or both of us might be a fiction we've made up, you only have to say so, and I'll talk to someone else who's interested in actually communicating. When I encounter such people, I save myself the trouble of trying to explain. You cannot communicate with people who insist on placing the discussion within a framework in which they are the sole arbiters of truth. It's a game in which mutual respect is not a rule of engagement, and mutual understanding is not a goal, much less a preferred outcome. It is inconceivable to them that there is anything they could be missing, or any prejudice in their presumption of intellectual superiority. Such arrogance is impenetrable. You can't communicate with someone who doesn't want to understand.

Consciousness is so ordinary that it's Extra-Ordinary...

I wish people would stop citing Dean Radin. The man claims to bend spoons with his mind.Johnny Carson debunked Uri Gellar ,the most famous spoon bender.I don't dispute that everything we can know starts with consciousness but people who make these wild claims with no data to back it up only hurts the consciousness argument.

Wow...."you cannot prove that i exist"...such a hollow statement, and ignorant to both the history and future of consciousness itself.

Deepak Chopra is quite annoying i must say

Leonard mlodinow is the worst

Amazing how so-called "smart" people can convince themselves of ridiculous concepts. (Kastrup and the Idealism school).