Sign Up for FREE for 7 Days of our Athlete Strength Training App - Peak Strength 💪 👉 www.peakstrength.app/?YT&Video&APP&TAEKWONDOstrengthps

I´m taekwondo coach and P.E. graduated and I have to say, I miss this in taekwondo. It's rare to see a training designed so specifically for taekwondo, even for coming from taekwondo coaches. You really looked through the lens of taekwondo. Congratulations for the fine job!

Wao, I'm from martial arts and always follow this channel, but this video blowed my mind 🤯 this guy really knows how to adapt strength development to any sport! Amazing.

Awesome video, thanks for the advice. With best wishes.

Great information, thank you!

Great video, definition of good strength program for martial art. Next one should be for distance running😉

Can you do one for kickboxing, muay thai and catch wrestling and karate? Great videos

Super excited about this but I can’t find TKD focused training in the app? Did this programming get removed from the combat sports section?

Can you also do a video for k1/kickboxing?

oooooooooh noice 🥋

I just created an account for the app and can’t seem to find the option for taekwondo

What's with the background! U working out of the econo lodge now?

THIS is the episode I’ve been waiting for! However, it has me scratching my head a bit: is there really a need to recreate the unilateral of taekwondo in the weight room? Wouldn’t it be simpler to let the sport specific training itself (in this case taekwondo) take care of that, and focus on just putting more horse power into the athlete via normal bilateral moves like squats, power cleans, box jumps, bench press, and so on that develop absolute strength and power much more reliably? I assume the argument is that unilateral movements have greater “carryover” to the unilateral nature of the sport, but if that is the case, then wouldn’t training the sport itself be more efficient? And if the purpose is for training to develop strength, wouldn’t achieving greater absolute strength (with easier programming to boot) via standard squat, clean etc. just be easier for the average taekwondo athlete? Then, even if we were to grant that the unilateral aspect aids in the carryover of strength gains better than bilateral, wouldn’t the marginal strength advantage you’d hypothetically gain from unilateral movements be offset by the difficulty in programming and progression when compared to standard bilateral movements? I’m sure there’s a separate argument to be made for dynamic trunk control, which I’m a fan of, but it just seems to me (as someone who does taekwondo and has decent squat numbers) that the most *reliable* strength carryover for a taekwondo athlete who doesn’t pay for an s&c coach and has to do their own programming-like most of your viewer base-comes from progressing your back squats, power cleans and bench press, and letting sport specific training do the rest. It feels to me like reliably and cheaply putting more horse powers into the race car is more important than fussing over the model of the engine. Or perhaps I’m wrong? Perhaps I really would have been better off progressing my single leg squats over the years rather than normal back squats five pounds per workout?

can you do MMA?

我觉得你是错的，单边训练对于双边来说，收益太小。

actually Dane, taekowondo is an art not a sport. trust me I am a red1 in taekowondo, and am soon to be a red2.

JESUS CHRIST THE LORD IS COMING REPENT 💞 KADOSH ADONAI