Well, since he has almost all the tanks that would be kinda pointless :D Edit: Unless you mean with his win ratios, that would be tricky though with 1 battle 0 wins tanks

I back this, do it qb please

@@mejdzrenterprises I doubt he’s only played 1 game in any tank.

@@mejdzrenterprises I do mean by win rate. He would have to obviously exclude tanks with less than 10 or 20 battles. I'm sure there are some tanks in his garage that he's played more than a couple times that don't have great win rates. That would be something interesting for him to go through and explain why his win rate is low for that particular tank. Just something I thought of when he had his garage open and I saw some tanks with lower than his average win rates.

yeah id watch tf out of this

10 years ago the game did not suck. Up until (not including) ver 1.0, the game made sense. It doesn't make sense anymore after ver 1.0 was released. It's terrible.

the easy8 took a turn for the worse when the japanese heavies were introduced. until then you could make the pen work, but against the o-i it's pointless. the t-34-85m also completely outclasses the e8.

I haven't played in 4 or 5 years and went back into it recently for the "account time" rewards drop this year.... yeah the game has definitely got worse. I play World of Warships and both games have gone super far into the fantasy that they may as well not even bother with "historical" vehicles at all.

The Easy "sucks" because it's up against tier VII and VIII. It does fine vs VI. Just my opinion.

Past year win Kolobanov with M4A3E8 :)

Definitely. He played the "worst tier 6 tanks," but using equipment and having crews with BiA and intuition isn't really the authentic "worst tank" experience.

This!!!

I completely agree with you!

@@France_esco same, only acceptable thing in my progetto 66 is the crew, the rest of the tank Stock makes me want to stab my balls

Yeah but idk I wouldn’t enjoy watching him just play stock tanks regardless of how authentic the experience is

@@KawaiianArgument E8 is a beast in tier 8 you have to be good at the game though

@@heresy3573 every tank is a beast if a good player is driving it against bad players. That doesn't make it a good tank.

@@Erowens98 I disagree

E8 is actually quite good when up tiered. It has decent pen with gold rounds and it has massive DPM. It has decent mobility and most importantly, a lot of gun depression with strong view range. It allows this tank to be flexible and to handle ridge lines well. E8 can peek and DPM down other vehicles little by little. Its vert stabs also allows it to peek and take a shot without much aiming. It makes a really strong and evasive tank. I did not felt as useless as I feel when up tiered with other tanks.

your dpm is insane, u can farm a lot of damage, has a nice moility and quite good at aiming. I remember my first M class with this baby in a tier 8 matchmaking with 3k damage. this tank shouldn't be in this video. I lost my respect for quickybaby

Same here, play tier 5 get tier 7, play 6 get 8, play 7 get 9 and 8 get 10. You get good at playing those higher tier tanks. You blow up much better.

I'm almost always bottom tiered when I play

He makes it no secret he cherry picks his games. You're not seeing the other matches where he probably did get bottom tier most of the time.

They need to give it the M71 shot which would buff the pen to 132mm and give it the M93 premium rounds. The tier 5 uses the same exact ammo.

To be fair, almost none of the T5-6 tanks get accurate pen. PzIV's had 140mm starting from the F2 (so the H should have it), the L/70 on the Panther had 198mm pen, not this weird L/100 that's exclusive to WoT, which applies to the VK 30.01H, 30.02D and 30.02M too; the 85mm on the T-34-85 had 148mm pen, Tiger's 88 had 165, so neither the T6 Tigers nor the T7 Tiger are accurate... etc etc Not to mention most guns on the tanks that actually existed aren't even accurate. Tiger 2 was never build with a 10.5, M6 never had a 90mm, IS-3 had the same gun as the IS-2, IS-1 never got the 122mm, only the Super Hellcat had a 90mm, not the "normal" one, Su-100 didn't have a 122mm (why would they even call it the Su-100 and not the Su-122 P that actually had it?), etc etc Long story short, this game isn't accurate anywhere, it doesn't even try to be, and they're not claiming it anymore these days, either. it's all just balance purposes - the T6 shermans just got forgotten and drowned in power creep, because way back with just regular T-34-85's and VK30.02M's and stuff like that, they were pretty balanced and had actual upsides. Not to mention >80% of the vehicles are made up at this point.

@@dierare All the newer tanks since British tech tree added has more realistic pen added ever since. WG gotta buff them all up. That is why all the old tanks are doing bad now.

@@makemap yes, the pen on the easy8 is awfull but remember one word keyhand said in a stream when buffing was discussed: "buffs are critical as the buff one one tank effects all the other tanks matched up against" a wrong buff can destroy the whole game. a nerf is easier as it effects mostly if not eexclusively the nerfed tank.

@@dierare PZ 4 H should have been a tier 6. It faced off against T-34-85 and M4A3E8's. It was a later version of PZ 4. The tier 5 should have been Panzer 4 F2 or G version using the 7.5 cm KwK 40 L/43 as last gun. Accurate pen is what needs to be in this game to fix this to compete with later vehicles. Unhistorical guns can be removed any time.

That's what I was thinking. I thought it was an OK to good tank when I played it.

Seriously, I quit sometime after the French tree came in I think.. the Easy 8 was easily my favorite tank in the game, with both my best Win % (64%) and most kills in a match (12). Sad to see its fall from grace.

Funny how the game is full of tanks and their stats that are like completely made up but then WG goes "yeah so there's this little detail about the E8 that we specifically made true to real life..."

@@VoltigeurGT IIRC, Shermans being able to use vert stabs has been a thing for as long as vert stabs have been in the game.

some of us still do this. We just do it to defenders now!

I'm surprised too. I like E8 more than Jumbo Sherman but Cromwell is still most fun imo. Sure it's not super awesome but it's enjoyable and it's a definition of average mid-tier medium.

Well, Easy 8/Sherman is like Tiger 1, a popular tank with many games and movies talk about them so new players want to play it and I think that most new players don't know much about other tank weakpoint...

My problem isn't the E8 it's the jumbo Sherman having the good 152mm armored turret as the first and the best turret being the weakest.

It’s an iconic tank so every new player drives it just like the tiger

I agree, I would have never guessed it was that bad. I have a 56%wr in it, I guess it just fits my playstyle

No, all of the Shermans had a stabilizer but the stabilizer only works vertically

I stopped playing wot like 6th months ago. I played from 1.1 If I remember correctly. The vk28 was one of my fav tanks, with the huge ramming power I outplayed a lot of tank, specially the paper type64s... Ended with 3 marks and 16.k games with 60% win ratio... And I was not even trying to play good, I was just memeing around ramming and bullyng small tanks...

Can't go around saying it is so important and then ignore it, right?

Any tank will feel amazing in such a scenario

I like it too, 56%, compared to my overall 51%.

I believe it’s because the easy 8 is an iconic tank at mid tiers so a lot of new players play it which drags down its win rating.

there is absolutely no way you marked the easy 8 in 16 games. Unless maybe you avg 5k combined

@@i_am_not_stupid_8953 he prob means 1 mark 😒

@@i_am_not_stupid_8953 only 1 Mark

@@luckylucc848 yes 1 Mark 😂

:(

nah I'm playing since 2012 and I wouldn't say the tank was especially good even back then. For me it was always a rather mediocre tank, since tanks like T-34-85 and the german medium tanks were better with regards to armor, alpha dmg and penetration.

Power creep is the biggest reason why I don't play WoT anymore.

The sad reality of a "free to play" and "service based game" where the devs have to constantly change and add things to keep making money in order to keep changing things to keep new players coming into it. There was a point where WoT was in a really good state, many years ago, and really wish it had been left like that. I'm at the point were I am enjoying games that get released "done" (as much as they can be these days) and I can just play them.

@@KawaiianArgument Will definitely try that, thanks :)

good luck

players spamming always gold are pretty bad players if you ask me.

Your absolutely right, MM is not fair at all. Here's my breakdown of ten random games, random tiers. One top tier game, one even tier game, 4 One tier lower games and 4 two tier lower games. Play that every day.

@@KawaiianArgument I totally understand, and actually kind of agree with that, but they should've changed certain vehicles along with the HE changes. I mean, it does create a bigger skill gap - which makes the game better so I guess there's both pros and cons

He's made many videos like this already. Highly recommend checking them out

haha yeah that was fun, and for some reason it had superb mobility as well.

And the T5 has the better turred armor. I really hate the KV-1S.

It really flies when you remember the days when the KV1 and KV2 where one tank at tier 5.