Silly euphemisms like, with child.

Professor of Neuroscience

He's excellent!!!

Cut to Trumpers and most GOP being entirely afraid of science.

Ok, what’s your point?

And this one beautifully did both.

But very few do both, which this talk did perfectly.

" I'm " ? Is that an English word ?

You insult your son on YT? What a mother.

Don't see any insult there.

I prefer softy over sissy. I never liked male roughness. I always preferred connecting with other males.

​@@janaeroshumba760 Softy is NOT an insult. Try sissy, now that's an insult. Why are you so sensitive about this subject?

What do you mean by "clinical relevance"?

@@TheKrispyfort I don't remember. It's been too long

@@JenSumma lemme help you "information relevant to the clinical setting" So, yes, a demonstration of correlation that currently would have no impact to a patient's care in a clinical setting.

@@TheKrispyfort Big man, I know the definition. You're not the only one with medical background. I simply don't remember what the video is about. Thought you wanted specifics

@@JenSumma I'm gender fluid, not a bloke 😆

Its mostly because of homophobia. The next thing would be the fact that most people are straight.

well, the discrimination and hypocrisy that comes with it [heteronormativity], certainly is a social construct and conspiracy against minorities, don't you agree?

True but could have some more characters than hetero all the time. And some more shows and super heroes once in a while

@@nickdavidelijahthank you

But gays still have long been under-represented in most aspects of public life, from TV and movies, to political office, to corporate CEOs, even relative to their percent of the population. In my lifetime, when I was young, there was practically NO mention in media of gays, and the few mentions were extremely negative, usually trying to make a villain character look more "creepy". This is not ancient history.

Not even close to being true.

read his study ^^ then come to comment ;)

@@matthewaussurin3566 Where is it?

But it's not nonsense. Or did you miss the part where multiple studies support his findings?

also he lowkey tried too say it was choice. which it is not

Genetics explain no more than 25% (and that's extremely liberal) of homosexuality observed in humans. Cope. Most homosexuals are made.

@@gens0kyo wdym "most homosexuals are made"

@@gens0kyo clearly you dont know anything. unless you can supply multiple articals that support your claim. you cant be going around spreading miss-informatin.

What is a choice? Science?

Lol just like abortion right?

These women CHOSE to have longer index fingers.

i remember being in the womb when i chose to have brown eyes!

That's a big claim, care to back it up with data?

if you are looking for funny videos go find another channel. TED is for people interested in education, not a comedy.

Professor of Neuroscience

@Nick Xero their are other studies which come to a different conclusion

As a fmr research scientist, I can assure you that his description is not one of pseudoscience. He tested the hypothesis by taking objective measurements and crunching the numbers. Can't get more Scientific Method than that.

@@TheKrispyfort what objective measurments?

@@joeschmoe2202 seriously? (le sigh) that would be the finger lengths

Please present your credentials against his.