Here's a short explanation of where Mass Moment of Inertia comes from, using a simple mechanical example. Turns out that it is not hard to understand :-)
Пікірлер: 30
@brianart87004 жыл бұрын
Easily one of the best physics videos out here. Thanks 👍🏻
@MultiJamesman3 жыл бұрын
You start of the video with a fantastic explanation using simple logic and English. Bravo and thank you. It's amazing how this is possible and how many physics/math educators miss this totally.
@te_a_09_shrishail_biradar.752 жыл бұрын
This is one of the most clear and logical explanation I've ever heard please keep up doing good work sir
@nkosanancube92002 жыл бұрын
outstanding
@islandmonusvi4 жыл бұрын
The rest mass Moment of Inertia is within the ‘zero’ Mandelbrot Set. The rotational Moment is within the Julia Set limited by the R=2 boundary.
@ahmedibrahem93554 жыл бұрын
Explain the principal of Mass Moment of Inertia for a rigid body. Define the radius of gyration. How would you change the axis of moment of inertia? Prove your answer by necessary equations and graphs.
@msmssm9417 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@frankdimeglio82162 жыл бұрын
The ultimate mathematical definition of what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is F=ma AND E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE): UNDERSTANDING WEIGHT AS BALANCED AND INTERACTIVE INERTIA/INERTIAL RESISTANCE: Define “mass”. You cannot. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Weight ultimately pertains to and involves what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=mc² is F=ma. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Weight necessarily pertains to distance in/of SPACE.) Gravity AND weight are characterized by electromagnetic/gravitational interaction. NOTE: “Inertia" is not properly defined AND understood. The new/correct designation is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. By Frank DiMeglio
@ahmedkamla21093 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@aaronmorris33476 жыл бұрын
"you can get them on Amazon, trust me" Prime?
@kevinmenezes83864 жыл бұрын
"Turns out its not hard to understand .. " if you explain it like that. . .
@wesleyfincher32086 жыл бұрын
Incredible, I could not find anywhere through a google search, why we use the integral of x squared, y squared, etc for moment of inertia. Thank you so much. I wish this was the introduction to moment of inertia is statics.
@williamstryker66435 жыл бұрын
Love the Amazon pitch. Joking aside-intuitive progression and examples.
@guitarttimman5 жыл бұрын
Yet another way to come up with I is to look at the circular analog of kinetic energy and replace appropriate variables and define I. KE = 1/2mV^2. Replace V with omega * r and integrate dm over a region. Just define the mr^2 as a point mass of inertia and replace it with I.
@WRXXXual7 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the refresher class! I am currently dealing with this issue at work when comparing the lightness of wheel/tire combinations vs. durability against off road terrain features.
@purdueMET7 жыл бұрын
I'm glad this helps with a practical problem like yours. BTW, the previous video on this channel is how to measure mass moment of inertia of a wheel: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g9SidsmSmaqzppc.html
@upanddown79117 жыл бұрын
Thank you for giving us so quality videos.
@purdueMET7 жыл бұрын
You're most welcome. There are more on the way :-)
@guitarttimman5 жыл бұрын
The tangential force is equal to mass times the velocity squared divided by the radius. Who remembers that v = omega * r? omega being the angular velocity. Etc. All of this is derived using the fundamentals of differential and integral calculus. About the only time things can get weird is when the accelerations aren't constant.
@adammiszta5 жыл бұрын
Love your videos!
@Johnvincentvivek5 жыл бұрын
Sir Good morning. You are my teacher.
@guitarttimman5 жыл бұрын
torgue also equals FXr which is Fr sin(theta). Of course that will be the perpendicular component of the force, but if it's already perpendicular then we know we have Fr Sin(90) = Fr. F = moment/r.
@selvams70616 жыл бұрын
plz explain parallel axis theorem
@guitarttimman5 жыл бұрын
Inertia is the analog to linear mass and it derived in a similar manner to how kinetic energy is derived. I actually attended Purdue back in the 80's, and I became an expert in math in physics in a period of about a month. I was really a strange looking guy back then, but prior to that experience, I was, believe it or not, a playboy hippie. Isn't that funny? Anyway, KE is derived by starting with a distance and taking derivatives and then integration to take the time out of the equation and express everything in terms of m, v, and distance which everybody represented with an S, and then applying Fig Newton's law ( I used to eat those during class. It was fun.) Really, yeah both energy and inertia are consequences of Newton's second law. If we're talking about linear, then utilize F dot S and use kinematics to show that F dot S equals change in energy in terms of mass and velocity. In an angular system you will utilize angular distance, arc length if you will, and solve in terns of theta in terms of the radius and the mass. After all, the inertia of a point mass is MR^2. Each MR^2 is replaced by I. That's your inertia for a point mass. To find the total inertia for a volume of a function, use the density function to manipulate the equation so that the volumes cancel and the R^2 and Mass are left over. That will sum up all of the moments over the region bounded by the volume.
@rahulpebb7 жыл бұрын
Hi professor, can you please explain about principal axis and area moment of inertia about principal axis and least radius of gyration. Thank you.
@guitarttimman5 жыл бұрын
Use vector analysis. I think it's weird how so many people know how to calculate the sliding force that will cause an object to freely slide down an incline, but most don't know about the impending force and the least force.