Robert Bork: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK Institute

  Рет қаралды 151,255

Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate

Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate

14 жыл бұрын

Stay Informed: emkinstitute.org/borkvid
As the Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan get underway, the Edward M. Kennedy Institute is partnering with the PBS NewsHour to provide video highlights of the nine most recent Senate confirmation hearings.
President Reagan nominated Judge Bork to the Supreme Court on July 1, 1987. After a heated confirmation battle, the Senate rejected his nomination by a 42-58 vote on October 23, 1987.

Пікірлер: 474
@mealsready2eat
@mealsready2eat 11 жыл бұрын
Love these old News Hour clips. If they aren't already all online, they should put them all online. RIP Robert Bork.
@johnpatmos1722
@johnpatmos1722 2 жыл бұрын
They actually let the guest (nominee) time to speak. Today, it is nothing more than a series of talking points by the Senator/Representative, leaving next to no time for the guest to answer. That said, they still came into the hearing with their minds already made up!
@maagu4779
@maagu4779 Жыл бұрын
Always a gentleman.
@OUWATZAHLE08
@OUWATZAHLE08 13 жыл бұрын
Robert H. Bork very smart man
@Ri5004
@Ri5004 4 жыл бұрын
the smartest man besides einstein himself
@MrAdamNTProtester
@MrAdamNTProtester 4 жыл бұрын
NOT a racist
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
Not re contraceptives not GLBT
@LouiseGatlin
@LouiseGatlin Ай бұрын
​@@biruss😂4😢🎉
@nomibe2911
@nomibe2911 12 жыл бұрын
Robert Bork is the model that no subsequent nominee followed. People complain about Supreme Court nominees not telling us nothing and being general in their answers but when someone like Bork gives us what we want we reject their nomination.
@kyledonahue33
@kyledonahue33 3 жыл бұрын
thats what i was thinking when comparing this to the markedly reserved answers of coney barrett. and even when she answered in this guarded way, the opposition extrapolated all the accusations they wanted from her silence or whatever implications could be made from fairly innocuous details from decades prior. so there is something of an arms race going on with the senate.
@-divinetragedy
@-divinetragedy 3 жыл бұрын
Why do you admire this person that wants to limit your most basic rights? Or is it just because it doesn't affect you because you're his target demographic?
@-divinetragedy
@-divinetragedy 3 жыл бұрын
He gave us a load of hot fucking air combined with viewpoints too extreme for even the 80s. He voted to keep segregation in place!
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
@@-divinetragedy he did not vote so. His problem was with upholding Comstock and being anti gay
@razaahmad9133
@razaahmad9133 2 жыл бұрын
@@-divinetragedy you can’t judge judges and their opinions based on what’s politically convenient and morally good in your mind You have to judge them based on actual legal arguments I’d like to hear your legal arguments as to why Bork’s opinions aren’t valid
@SUpersaiyajinjerkbag
@SUpersaiyajinjerkbag 11 жыл бұрын
I may be naive but Bork didn't paint himself as stupidly as most other politicos
@ordinarypete
@ordinarypete 2 жыл бұрын
Which is why Biden said he’d never vote him in.
@JesseKanner
@JesseKanner 2 жыл бұрын
His response to the questions re: Griswold was weak and evasive. He refused to pick up Biden's premise based on flimsy assumptions. Just cause he thought there was no way a prosecutor would actually *do* a thing makes no difference as to whether they MIGHT. Constitution protections are largely based on theoreticals.
@ysaismartinez250
@ysaismartinez250 9 жыл бұрын
Wow, Bork was brilliant! Supreme Court Nomination hearings are a joke nowadays. The depth of his responses is unparalleled. Contrast these hearings with the hearings over the last 10 years.
@winstonsmith535
@winstonsmith535 8 жыл бұрын
The Jews feared this brilliant man.
@chicagoeconomist1643
@chicagoeconomist1643 7 жыл бұрын
Winston Smith you are a fucking moron. Do you know how many of his students and legal admirers are Jewish?
@Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong
@Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong 6 жыл бұрын
That was the problem. He was too honest about what his views were that it sunk his confirmation. Nominees to the SC ever since have been very careful with their words.
@paleo704
@paleo704 6 жыл бұрын
Winston Smith yep
@valerierawlins1298
@valerierawlins1298 5 жыл бұрын
@@winstonsmith535 may I ask why you are targetting the Jewish people??
@rentslave
@rentslave 8 жыл бұрын
That killer was sitting in judgment of Bork!
@MichaelCH2007
@MichaelCH2007 3 жыл бұрын
An unsavory politician bashing the conduct of someone who had a good reputation. Imagine
@robingardella6240
@robingardella6240 3 жыл бұрын
Oh now I know who you mean! 😂
@harrycrux7757
@harrycrux7757 3 жыл бұрын
Damn we really missed out this guy was good !
@prof1389
@prof1389 3 жыл бұрын
If you’re into theocracies and segregation, sure.
@KleWdSide
@KleWdSide 3 жыл бұрын
I guess if you're into corrupt Watergate figures & people who want to roll back on civil rights, then yes... he's a saint.
@CATCHFathers
@CATCHFathers 3 жыл бұрын
Prof 138 can you elaborate on bork’s stance on segregation?
@robbiejohnston9409
@robbiejohnston9409 3 жыл бұрын
@@KleWdSide oh brother give me a fkn break you know Bork doesn't want to roll back civil rights 😂 he just wants the legislative branch to deal with democratic ideas not a couple of tyrants (judges)
@cjmac4950
@cjmac4950 3 жыл бұрын
@@KleWdSide now we have Jim Crow Joe Biden as leader. Or whoever is pulling strings. Talk about pro-segregation
@jimwolf8121
@jimwolf8121 8 күн бұрын
Judge Bork went to my church. I saw him there most Sundays.
@MichaelCH2007
@MichaelCH2007 3 жыл бұрын
For the shenanigans during the Kavanaugh hearing, this hearing was what paved the way for that behavior. Thanks Kennedy
@lincolnmaceachern2410
@lincolnmaceachern2410 3 жыл бұрын
To say nothing of Anita Hill; supposedly sexually harassed, but she followed Thomas with each promotion. Seems like she was thrown in, like a grenade, when the Dems realized they didn't have the votes ( just like Blasey Ford years later ). If Trump had picked a man to succeed RBG, he certainly would have been accused of sexual crimes.
@cjmac4950
@cjmac4950 3 жыл бұрын
And to think Ted Kennedy killed a woman and got away with it. A shit person. Biden is a turd too
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
@@lincolnmaceachern2410 did you hear of the second woman who never got to tesify
@mickeywood3012
@mickeywood3012 3 жыл бұрын
Thomas Jefferson wrote, in his notes on Virginia, that once HIS idea of what the Constitution represented, that that, was the Republic vetted. His Republic, was the Republic that had the integrity and should be the Constitution of "We, the People". Thomas Jeffersons Constitution is what Lincoln used to describe as a Government Of the People, By the People, For the people.
@kristinapace3056
@kristinapace3056 Жыл бұрын
Yeah but that means majority rules
@mickeywood3012
@mickeywood3012 Жыл бұрын
@@kristinapace3056 That's what Democracy is. It's how it's supposed to work. The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. What did you think a Democracy is?
@kristinapace3056
@kristinapace3056 Жыл бұрын
Exactly my point same hat different head
@petershelley4514
@petershelley4514 Жыл бұрын
jefferson was a racist...his ideas are shit stains
@clevelandindians4843
@clevelandindians4843 Ай бұрын
Reagan turned it into a government of, for and by corporations
@tmm4633
@tmm4633 2 жыл бұрын
The laughter in the room at 11:32 is why you never ask an intelligent man a dumb question with people around.
@kristinapace3056
@kristinapace3056 Жыл бұрын
And they let him run for president :'(
@josephduplaga7595
@josephduplaga7595 3 жыл бұрын
Today's senators could learn something from senators of the past who didn't constantly say reclaim my time reclaim my time when somebody they're questioning is speaking
@Russ_Hoops
@Russ_Hoops 2 жыл бұрын
There is a time limit for HR members during hearings. If the person testifying is attempting to filibuster with their answer, or simply isn't giving the Congressman the answer they want, the Congressman will request to reclaim their time so that they can ask more questions later. I don't think there was a time limit rule for Senate hearings in the 80s.
@aa697
@aa697 2 жыл бұрын
Bork would have made a great Supreme Court Justice. What a shame he didn't.
@biruss
@biruss Ай бұрын
He'd be anti glbt
@jamesharris184
@jamesharris184 2 жыл бұрын
C- Biden from no name law school asking about a wire tap and condoms. Little surprise here.
@baqirhemraj7639
@baqirhemraj7639 2 жыл бұрын
It is a pity that Robert Bork was not nominated, he would have been a great judge in the Supreme Court.
@NextGenStudentUC
@NextGenStudentUC Жыл бұрын
He was nominated. That's what this hearing is about. His problem was that the Senate voted against his confirmation.
@baqirhemraj7639
@baqirhemraj7639 Жыл бұрын
@@NextGenStudentUC You are right, I meant not confirmed by the Senate who are more interested in making money through the lobby system, which is bribery and blatant abuse of power and the public suffers because appropriate laws to curb abusees are water downed or not passed.
@kristinapace3056
@kristinapace3056 Жыл бұрын
IDK about that for sure
@M.A.C.01
@M.A.C.01 Жыл бұрын
I seriously doubt it
@baqirhemraj7639
@baqirhemraj7639 Жыл бұрын
@@M.A.C.01 On what basis are you doubting my statement, do you have any evidence?
@Michael-ug3vn
@Michael-ug3vn 7 жыл бұрын
What a shame. Bork was brilliant.
@libertyann439
@libertyann439 5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant as a person and well-spoken yes. But he did not belong on the Supreme Court.
@thomaspayne6866
@thomaspayne6866 5 жыл бұрын
liberty Ann Meaningless comment. State WHY
@libertyann439
@libertyann439 5 жыл бұрын
@@thomaspayne6866 It's not meaningless. You just don't understand it.
@valerierawlins1298
@valerierawlins1298 5 жыл бұрын
@@thomaspayne6866 do not expect a cogent reply.
@politicman1
@politicman1 5 жыл бұрын
liberty Ann @Angelo It's not meaningless. You just don't understand it. You seem to be one lame ass, lazy individual, why did you not elaborate on Angelo's question, in regards to Robert Bork not belonging on the Supreme Court?
@thefakenewsnetwork8072
@thefakenewsnetwork8072 2 жыл бұрын
Long live robert bork s legacy
@richard9480
@richard9480 4 ай бұрын
Brilliant mind!
@viraphanhoriyavong1455
@viraphanhoriyavong1455 2 жыл бұрын
That s right
@Kimmis1990
@Kimmis1990 12 жыл бұрын
and sometimes they give us bad ones.
@jay1373
@jay1373 7 күн бұрын
I'm not joking, he looks like exactly like my local plumber.
@kristinapace3056
@kristinapace3056 Жыл бұрын
He makes a lot of sense and has common sense
@MondoBeno
@MondoBeno 2 жыл бұрын
I was in third grade at this time, and I wrote a letter to Senator D'Amato asking him to vote no. I said 'Judge Bork doesn't care about Black peoples' rights." The real reason I hated Bork was that they cancelled my cartoons to put this hearing on TV.
@ogzombieblunt4626
@ogzombieblunt4626 2 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@johnmarknielsen
@johnmarknielsen Жыл бұрын
Sorry you lost your cartoons. Sadly, with the rejection of Bork, as a country, we lost our marbles.
@grovercleavland2698
@grovercleavland2698 11 ай бұрын
Would you still ask the senator to vote no?
@MondoBeno
@MondoBeno 11 ай бұрын
@@grovercleavland2698 I probably would. The constitution was meant to protect our personal rights and limit what the government could do to us. It wasn't designed to keep everyone moral.
@TranJack123
@TranJack123 4 ай бұрын
Congratulation. You made a better argument against Bork’s nomination than any senator on that floor.
@brianlogan4243
@brianlogan4243 3 жыл бұрын
IMO Bork was not confirmed because of his actions during watergate during a democratic majority and his closing remarks on why he wanted to serve on the high court.
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
He lost because of his mistake vin stating Griswold v Connecticut and Bowers v. Hardwick
@jfrsnjhnsn
@jfrsnjhnsn 3 жыл бұрын
5:46 "I don't want to be regarded as an apparatchik, an organization man who will do whatever the organization wants". No republican today would ever actually think this.
@prometheusrex1
@prometheusrex1 2 жыл бұрын
Same for any democrat today. They're cogs in the dem machine.
@RonTurchyniak
@RonTurchyniak 2 жыл бұрын
It was a brilliant 1 liner. Tulsi G does have a similar mindset.
@jimbrown609
@jimbrown609 2 жыл бұрын
"Isn't that a bogus argument. we're not talking about unisex toliets here we're talking about fundamental rights". Fast forward 40 yrs same room there arguing for unisex toliets lol
@SardonicALLY
@SardonicALLY 7 жыл бұрын
Bork calling Orson, Bork calling Orson, come in Orson ... was this guy from another planet? =P
@bricksaccomplice3004
@bricksaccomplice3004 5 жыл бұрын
1. Bork got Borked 2. Clearance got Borked 3. Kavanaugh got Borked 4. Who's next
@CaptDNA
@CaptDNA 5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant mind
@johnmorris482
@johnmorris482 5 жыл бұрын
Hatchet man in Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
@Vincent Cuttolo he ruled on favor of a company that fired fertile women.
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
@Vincent Cuttolo OCAW v. American Cyanamid. He condoned the companies telling the women to get sterilized or lose their jobs. They coukd have made the ladies forfeit a right to sue for birth defects that resulted from voluntary exposure to hazardous chemicals. No rational basis when there was a less burdensome and infringing alternative.
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
@Vincent Cuttolo they coukd have forbade pregnant women to work or sent them home, or had thrm sign a liability release
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
@Vincent Cuttolo barreness is not a bfooq
@Diamondmineboy
@Diamondmineboy 12 жыл бұрын
Sen Kennedy...nobody lower...paved the way for Gross Bad Manners in politics...
@larryr4004
@larryr4004 11 жыл бұрын
who's the lady in the gray suit behind him?
@odinswald
@odinswald 12 жыл бұрын
@nedster7 I agree most laws need to be repealed as their unintended consequences are limiting our freedoms and doing nothing, or making worse, for the lives of the ones they are purported to help. This action of massive repeals would probably keep Congress busy day and night for years.
@Zachw2007
@Zachw2007 13 жыл бұрын
Judge Bork should be on the Supreme Court right now.
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
No
@mrrogersrabbit
@mrrogersrabbit 4 жыл бұрын
He's too dead to do that
@boomerang6130
@boomerang6130 3 жыл бұрын
@@mrrogersrabbit LMAO, I was about to say the exact same thing. He is dead and living in hell with Ronald Reagan now. 😁
@boomerang6130
@boomerang6130 3 жыл бұрын
Sorry Z Watkins---He (Bork) is dead and living in hell with Ronald Reagan now. 😁
@HIMYMTR
@HIMYMTR 3 жыл бұрын
@@boomerang6130 no, only democrats go to hell
@S0nyToprano
@S0nyToprano 2 жыл бұрын
It’s so interesting watching this. Bork isn’t dumb. He’s just very much his own man and absolutely not afraid to be himself. Some people love that. Others don’t because it makes them question the need to conform and fit in. I like Bork but at the end of the day, his role in the Saturday Night massacre during the Watergate Scandal was probably what really sunk his nomination. That and originalist interpretations of the constitution are by their nature extremely partisan.
@dagnabbit6187
@dagnabbit6187 2 жыл бұрын
@ Michael Cortez No Robert Bork was not dumb but he had such extreme legal opinions that there were some Conservatives leery of having him on the Supreme Court . I wouldn’t go to the extreme and call Bork a Nazi but Bork did harbor a lot of autocratic views that I considered dangerous to our Republic .
@tomjones3232
@tomjones3232 2 жыл бұрын
@@dagnabbit6187 Like?
@dagnabbit6187
@dagnabbit6187 2 жыл бұрын
@@tomjones3232 It is there . Google it
@tomjones3232
@tomjones3232 2 жыл бұрын
@@dagnabbit6187 I mean, you brought it up. I'm trying to understand why his opinions were so extreme. Kind of hard to do that when I don't know what to look for.
@brianbeaubien7371
@brianbeaubien7371 3 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@rumplerug8937
@rumplerug8937 5 жыл бұрын
Robert Bork would have been a good justice.
@libertyann439
@libertyann439 5 жыл бұрын
In Iraq.
@paperbackonly8438
@paperbackonly8438 5 жыл бұрын
He is a brilliant mind. But I think he may be a little too unbending for the Supreme Court.
@johnmorris482
@johnmorris482 5 жыл бұрын
Nixon appreciated him, until he didn't.
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
Not for privacy rights
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
@Vincent Cuttolo 9th amendment not so much
@writersblock26
@writersblock26 12 жыл бұрын
@Zachw2007 Agreed.
@viraarmstrong9784
@viraarmstrong9784 Ай бұрын
Blessed are the Peacemakers - ALL who in their God Ordained Office Only desire for ALL in their sphere of influence to know why they do what they do and to change course NOW - if they so desire - before it is forever too late!
@richardsimms251
@richardsimms251 11 ай бұрын
Judge Bork was a better man than what the media assumed at that time. RS. Canada
@williamgregory1848
@williamgregory1848 9 ай бұрын
Reminder: Bork was given a full hearing in a Democratic Senate, which resulted in a 5-9 vote against him. Bork then demanded a vote from the full Senate anyway, Democrats obliged! And he was again voted down again 42-58, with six Republicans voting no. Bork was no victim. He was an extreme, weird nominee. But false memory of Republican nominated judges reflects the media bubble conservatives populate where old grievances are chewed over endlessly.
@robertfischer380
@robertfischer380 3 жыл бұрын
15:15 now what do we have?
@concernedcivilcitizen8780
@concernedcivilcitizen8780 3 жыл бұрын
#1 NOW IS A PERFECT TIME TO TAKE A LOOK AT *TERM LIMITS FOR ALL FEDERAL JUDGES *THE REAL-ISSUE CONCERNING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES = 3/4 OF A CENTURY FOR ONE MIND-SET ON A BENCH IS JUST TOO LONG!!! This is predicated on the answer to the question: Why are POLITICIANS from both parties clamoring so fervently to nominate Justices to all of the Federal Court benches? The answer to that question provides a clear understanding of how Americans have come to view our Federal Judges, and that is, as an arm of each political party, respectively. And the main follow-through on this fact is that Judges these days are more-than-willing to issue partisan rulings these days. This is in fact, realized, in the many rulings that have been issued from the various benches, from the lower Courts, right up through the Applet Courts, and through to the Supreme Court of these Lands. Just look at the resent Florida Court ruling on the "restoration of felon's right's to vote in elections. Consider the referendum-vote of the people of Florida, who voted overwhelming to give those rights back to those felons who have served their time for crimes committed." The Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, in his plight to manipulate the voter-ranks in the 2020 election, devised a plan to withhold the restoration of those felon's rights by arbitrarily imposing the requirement that those felons must pay back any fines before being able to vote. Moving through the court system, the claims of those felons, that this was not the People's Will, was dismissed by (Republican favored) Applet Judges, in favor of the voter-suppressing Republican Governor. This sort of ruling is plainly clear that Federal Judges are becoming increasingly partisan with their rulings. This could come back to find the Republican ranks on the other side of such future partisan rulings. So this is the solution: "We need to find a way to take partisanship out of our judicial system, the way it was intended in the first place. We need Term Limits for our Federal Judges, and a reform of the process of which they are appointed to the Benches" I believe, with the modern political climate, it will be impossible to solve, that is, within the process justices are appointed today. I believe the American People would be better served if our Judges were VOTED onto the benches by both branches of the government: House and the Senate. Most importantly, I believe LIFE APPOINTMENTS to the Bench is severely problematic for the Republic. Three quarters of a century could go by, having a partisan Justice sitting on the bench skewing rulings that only make sense to a small number of American Citizens. This has to change if we are to have a better system of government. The course we are on now will only render the US looking more and more like Belarus of today.
@Its_Me_Wheelz
@Its_Me_Wheelz 3 жыл бұрын
Everything you brought up sounds good. However, everything you brought up was brought up and argued by the founders. With judges having life tender removes the ability for corruption. Unless something could possibly be used against one for blackmail. Think of John Roberts and OBC ruling.
@jacksyoutubechannel4045
@jacksyoutubechannel4045 2 жыл бұрын
Frankly, judges shouldn't be representative of the people. That is where all the risks are: in having judges who believe they represent the people. The people can change the law if they want, but we should be able to rely on judges to uphold whatever we have made the law to be. (We could certainly do with more responsible journalism regarding the facts of the case and the legal underpinnings of decisions.) It's easy to "both sides" a great many things, but it is worth considering: when was the last time a democrat president (or the party generally) were consistently upset by the rulings of a SCOTUS Justice that was nominated by their party? Maybe Justice Byron White, who was nominated in the early 1960s. Meanwhile, in the last 15 years or so alone, Republicans have continuously lamented Stevens, Souter, Kennedy, Roberts, and more recently, Kavanaugh. [It's actually a pretty interesting phenomenon to read about, called "The Greenhouse Effect" after the NYT journalist who covered SCOTUS.]
@davidhealey3138
@davidhealey3138 2 жыл бұрын
This is the last time a Supreme Court nominee was able to openly articulate his/her views. Now all they do is obfuscate and stall during the hearings in order not to get "Borked" by the opposition
@flavirostris1972
@flavirostris1972 5 жыл бұрын
Stunning intellect ( Bork ). Wonder how it would have turned out with him on SC.
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
Wrong on glbt issues. He is personally biased agsinst them
@johnmorris482
@johnmorris482 5 жыл бұрын
If only he'd said 'I like BEER'!
@flavirostris1972
@flavirostris1972 5 жыл бұрын
@@johnmorris482 Back in 1987, Christine Blasey-Ford was still a would be beach cat lady. The wine and sun had yet to take their toll.
@ronaldbacker5475
@ronaldbacker5475 5 жыл бұрын
We would have got to today, 15 years earlier. And today we most likely would have instated authoritarian rule. Lets see if holding back the future 15 years can change it, so a democracy survives.
@guodade2239
@guodade2239 3 жыл бұрын
@@ronaldbacker5475 Quite probably the Democrats would have made more of an issue of a politicised Supreme Court in the 1988 election, or in 1992. That would be almost certain if someone like Edith Jones (who was younger than Clarence Thomas and just as conservative) was able to be nominated in place of David Souter without the fear of rejection Bork produced. Bork and Jones would have given a 6-3 majority to overturn Roe v. Wade in 1992. However, one can say exactly the same things about George Harrold Carswell in 1970 that could be said about Bork. If Carswell had got through, Gerald Ford would have been much less gun-shy about nominating an explicit conservative in place of John Paul Stevens. If that nominee was not turned down by a Senate more liberal than those who rejected Carswell and Bork, any 1976 Democratic nominee would have made much out of it - or the Democrats would have done so decades earlier than 2020.
@chrise.2666
@chrise.2666 3 жыл бұрын
Judy Woodward so cute back then, Bork would have been best judge in history
@juanagallo7497
@juanagallo7497 2 жыл бұрын
Cris E-- you're right-- Judy Woodruff was so cute-- and decades later she's still taking names and doing kick&ass interview s -- and looking mighty fine-- what a woman
@2gentrs
@2gentrs 13 жыл бұрын
@checkersisfortramps You're wrong there are three branches; judiciary, legislature i.e. Senate/House and the Executive i.e. President and his Cabinet. Your thinking of Parliamentary where the Legislature and the executive are a fused to some deegre
@roshkatan702
@roshkatan702 4 ай бұрын
Notice how Bork thought of himself as an Aparatchik, but not a "Useful Idiot"( which is not a slander)
@DeepHauz13
@DeepHauz13 12 жыл бұрын
@Zachw2007 his only problem was pride and that he needed to show the entire room that he was smarter than them, which he was. if he only kept it together, he would have gotten confirmed.
@09rja
@09rja 5 жыл бұрын
Strom!
@davidhardister8710
@davidhardister8710 2 жыл бұрын
Too bad Judge Bork did not make it on the bench. I think he would have made a great justice.
@blueknight07
@blueknight07 Жыл бұрын
While he was able to think on his feet, Borks continous reliance on inconsistent excuses was probably a bad reflection on his character. His explanation of the Saturday night massacre sounds suspiciously too convenient.
@kaewonf8
@kaewonf8 13 жыл бұрын
I'd never actually seen Bork's testimony before. Thanks for the upload. Compared to most of the justices who've been confirmed since, Bork seems both level-headed and super smart. That Thomas, Suter and Sotomayor are wearing robes and this guy isn't ranks up there with Chappaquiddick among Teddy's greatest disgraces.
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
Sadly, he didn't get the 9th
@janicknorman9396
@janicknorman9396 5 жыл бұрын
What a waste, Bork was sharp.
@ryanscates1011
@ryanscates1011 4 жыл бұрын
Bork was a disgrace, a threat to civil liberties and a friend of power hungry politicians. He deserved to to have been rejected.
@boomerang6130
@boomerang6130 3 жыл бұрын
@@ryanscates1011 Amen! I am glad they rejected him. This man looks like a drunk....look at him...LMAO--
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
Reject him for peeing on the 9th amendment
@yevgeniyzharinov7473
@yevgeniyzharinov7473 6 жыл бұрын
20:13 that assumption would not be born in reality, Justice John Marshall Harlan said so immediately- not over time.
@mrlarry271
@mrlarry271 2 жыл бұрын
Right off the bat his firing of Cox did not make him look particularly good to me. It was a mistake.
@Wyrmwould
@Wyrmwould 12 жыл бұрын
If Bork had been confirmed, how likely do you think it is that the Court would have overturned the Roe V. Wade decision in Casey or one of the other abortion cases? Furthermore, what would the court look like now if he were on it (making allowances for his age of course).
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
How would have ruled on texas v. Lawrence
@michaelmilam7285
@michaelmilam7285 Жыл бұрын
He wouldve overruled Roe in Planned Parenthood v. Casey because Kennedy, who was the man who replaced Borks nomination, voted in favor of keeping Roe which Bork never would've.
@maagu4779
@maagu4779 Жыл бұрын
I never heard a candidate so forthright in his answers!
@THEDonnyB
@THEDonnyB Жыл бұрын
And you'll never hear it again.
@amelaamelajiang493
@amelaamelajiang493 Жыл бұрын
March
@richardsimms251
@richardsimms251 11 ай бұрын
I-I think it was the “spooky” frightening beard that caused Judge Robert Bork’s non-confirmation to the Supreme Court. -He obviously was intelligent educated man and seemed a decent guy. RS. Canada
@thethreeofus2620
@thethreeofus2620 4 жыл бұрын
Ted Kennedy... He's getting his just desserts as we speak.
@boomerang6130
@boomerang6130 3 жыл бұрын
Kennedy is a hero and is in heaven. Bork and Reagan are serving in hell. hth...LOL
@cheese5728
@cheese5728 2 жыл бұрын
Tee Kennedy was a terrible person
@theopportuneson699
@theopportuneson699 2 жыл бұрын
Kennedy, Reagan, and Bork are all at rest, like we will be. Nothing more, nothing less.
@MondoBeno
@MondoBeno 2 жыл бұрын
If they'd known about the deal he made with Nixon, Reagan wouldn't have nominated him.
@crowtservo
@crowtservo 5 жыл бұрын
A white Democrat from Alabama? That’s different.
@theopportuneson699
@theopportuneson699 2 жыл бұрын
Even with the Reagan Revolution in national politics, Deep Southerners continued to vote for their Democrats in local and statewide elections until the mid-1990’s.
@jacksmith5692
@jacksmith5692 5 жыл бұрын
Big Al Simpson, always a pisser!
@Dr_JSH
@Dr_JSH 2 жыл бұрын
Regarding Griswold and Connecticut's ban on contraception, the law was NOT dead letter. Arrests were few because the law chilled doctors', nurses', pharmacists', health clinics', etc. interest in discussing, prescribing, and dispensing contraceptives. Also the ban had two parts. The first prohibited consumer use The second banned aiding and abetting anyone so they use contraception. This part of the law war enforced against health care providers. Otherwise, there would have been no defendants who could sue for the law to be declared unconstitutional.
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
Bork made a big booboo there
@thebeaniestbeanboys5735
@thebeaniestbeanboys5735 Жыл бұрын
Hello random person. Good luck on the civics homework.
@mixtecobajo5582
@mixtecobajo5582 2 жыл бұрын
12:05- 16:32 Robert Bork. 💯 Qualified for supreme court justice. What a disgrace democratic left media and senators tarnished his reputation.
@angelhare8374
@angelhare8374 2 жыл бұрын
Yes. As a fellow lftist I agree. This was a tragic mistake that set the stage for mcconnels power play This was the beginning of the politicing of the Supreme Court where we were more concerned if the nine was on our side rather than if he or she was qualified This was that point
@jpsartrean
@jpsartrean 13 жыл бұрын
@lladnarg murder requires intent to kill - if anything, I think it would have been negligent homicide...
@robingardella6240
@robingardella6240 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, this in a Supreme Court confirmation hearing? I’m aghast! Why was this allowed to happen? WAY too political of a candidate!! Toxic candidate, terrible, terrible choice!! 🤯 And Biden - what a jerk! 😝
@jewishqueenrebecca3943
@jewishqueenrebecca3943 3 жыл бұрын
Robert Bork was a racist and a criminal who didn't deserve to be anywhere near a court room
@-divinetragedy
@-divinetragedy 3 жыл бұрын
@@jewishqueenrebecca3943 he was a bastard indeed. These people will never understand how many people would suffer with this guy on the SCOTUS. Or maybe they enjoy it or don't care. Why can't the government just stay out of people's business? (lgbtq, the whole privacy thing) I though that was what conservatives stood for, or do they only stand for it when it benefits the big businesses that line their pockets?
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
@@jewishqueenrebecca3943 no, he was just anti privacy and forgot the 9th amendment
@jacksyoutubechannel4045
@jacksyoutubechannel4045 2 жыл бұрын
@@jewishqueenrebecca3943 If you believe Bork to be a racist, I would suggest watching the contradictory testimony (in this same hearing) of Thomas Sowell, who supported Bork's confirmation and refuted assertions from the senators who smeared Judge Bork as a racist, misogynist, etc.
@lukecarterpenney
@lukecarterpenney Жыл бұрын
10:49
@killyourtelevision999
@killyourtelevision999 3 жыл бұрын
9:37 Bork is obviously right and damn clear on this point, and here comes 11:12 Joe Biden with one of the dumbest hypotheticals ever. A wiretap to check for use of rubbers? Even the audience is amused.
@IIExhibitAII
@IIExhibitAII 3 жыл бұрын
Ironically he used that same wiretap with Obama to spy on trump administration. Joe is a vapid idiot!
@ayyoo2407
@ayyoo2407 3 жыл бұрын
That is hilarious 😂 Biden is an idiot lol
@benkleschinsky
@benkleschinsky 3 жыл бұрын
Tough on crime Biden. Bork would have voted against Patriot Act.
@benkleschinsky
@benkleschinsky 3 жыл бұрын
15:25 We're not talking about unisex toilets here. Flash forward to year 2020.
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
But the police did invade Hardwick privacy and the aiding and abetting Comstockion law was enforced
@internetmemeplace6886
@internetmemeplace6886 Жыл бұрын
When the democratic party had some brains 15:26 "That's bogus, We're not talking about unisex toilet seats"
@brandynhenry7107
@brandynhenry7107 11 жыл бұрын
Yep, it's nice to hear someone mention this, however rare it is anymore. I like to say, it's suppose to be a system of checks and balances, and that includes the people too. Of course, people are so ingrained in the thought of democracy and "rights", and I'm sure I don't need to explain this to you, it don't go over too well.
@Dr_JSH
@Dr_JSH 2 жыл бұрын
Says someone who has been led to believe the lie that zźó
@pantera29palms
@pantera29palms 3 жыл бұрын
Ah, the post-Nixon era....what a circus!
@lakeviewviking
@lakeviewviking 4 жыл бұрын
Mary Jo Kopechne couldn't be reached for comment.🏊
@gybx4094
@gybx4094 3 жыл бұрын
So true. As I get old, it's so frustrating to see humans forget history and refuse to learn from it. Even wild animals seem more orderly following their primordial instincts. Will we ever learn?
@OUWATZAHLE08
@OUWATZAHLE08 13 жыл бұрын
dont understand who would you ask bork about his beard what do this have do with it dont judge im just beacouse of the beard
@ptrekboxbreaks5198
@ptrekboxbreaks5198 3 жыл бұрын
What?
@SurvivalWorks-ji9wc
@SurvivalWorks-ji9wc 9 ай бұрын
Robe her toes. Then we need lower case robes. Safe and culturally upsetting to the farther cases. I agree here. We don't withstand the same rigors, figures and burdens. So it's no right here to be held by the judgements of the far past made far away. Especially where cars and trucks aren't yet rights a they're pulled up out of our crater lake valley. How did they ever drive to school, much less trial?
@josephduplaga7595
@josephduplaga7595 3 жыл бұрын
Judge bork ,a good man!
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
Not for glbtq
@Johnsmith99663
@Johnsmith99663 5 жыл бұрын
Bork? More like DORK! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahshahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahhahahahhahahhhahahhahahahhhahahahhhhhahhhhahhhahhhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahahhahahhahahahhaahahahahahahhahahhaahahahahhahhahahhahahhahahahahahhahhahhahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahahahaahhahahahhaahahahahhahahahhhahahahhhahahahhahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahhhahahhahhhahahahahhhahahahahhhahhahahahahhahahhhahahahahhahahahahhhhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahhhahahahahhahahhahaahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahaahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahahhahahhahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhaahahhahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahhahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahhahhahahahahhhaahahahhahahhaahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahshahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahhahahahhahahhhahahhahahahhhahahahhhhhahhhhahhhahhhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahahhahahhahahahhaahahahahahahhahahhaahahahahhahhahahhahahhahahahahahhahhahhahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahahahaahhahahahhaahahahahhahahahhhahahahhhahahahhahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahhhahahhahhhahahahahhhahahahahhhahhahahahahhahahhhahahahahhahahahahhhhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahhhahahahahhahahhahaahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahaahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahahhahahhahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhaahahhahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahhahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahhahhahahahahhhaahahahhahahhaahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahajahahahahahahahahahajahajajhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhhhahahahahahahhhahahahagaghahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahshahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahhahahahhahahhhahahhahahahhhahahahhhhhahhhhahhhahhhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahahhahahhahahahhaahahahahahahhahahhaahahahahhahhahahhahahhahahahahahhahhahhahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahahahaahhahahahhaahahahahhahahahhhahahahhhahahahhahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahhhahahhahhhahahahahhhahahahahhhahhahahahahhahahhhahahahahhahahahahhhhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahhhahahahahhahahhahaahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahaahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahahhahahhahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhaahahhahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahhahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahhahhahahahahhhaahahahhahahhaahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahshahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahhahahahhahahhhahahhahahahhhahahahhhhhahhhhahhhahhhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahahhahahhahahahhaahahahahahahhahahhaahahahahhahhahahhahahhahahahahahhahhahhahhahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahahahaahhahahahhaahahahahhahahahhhahahahhhahahahhahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahahhhahahhahhhahahahahhhahahahahhhahhahahahahhahahhhahahahahhahahahahhhhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahhhahahahahhahahhahaahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahaahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahahhahahhahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaahahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhaahahhahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahhahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahhahhahahahahhhaahahahhahahhaahahahhaahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahajahahahahahahahahahajahajajhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhhhahahahahahahhhahahahagaghahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
@nomibe2911
@nomibe2911 12 жыл бұрын
This guy taught one future President and taught the wife of that President that almost became President.
@jpsartrean
@jpsartrean 14 жыл бұрын
@ToxicOdiousOne How is the Civil Rights Act unconsitutional?
@mr.g1758
@mr.g1758 5 жыл бұрын
Bork getting turned down is equivalent to George Washington getting taken out of history books in favor of Madonna...which if you didn't know, is actually happening.
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
Read his views on what people do in their bedroom
@biruss
@biruss 5 жыл бұрын
The law was enforced oncw bork. You lose bork. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere, judge bork
@Doc418
@Doc418 13 жыл бұрын
The right of privacy is one of those rights which is a limit on the powers of government, even if not specifically in the Constitution. There are restrictions to government powers, and when a right is not specifically protected in the constitution, it is still up to the courts to keep government constrained within its define powers, instead of allowing the government to infringed on the unemurated rights of people. Thank God Bork is not on the court...
@biruss
@biruss 2 жыл бұрын
@Suave House Obama's ALSO bad.
@gloriadouglas5968
@gloriadouglas5968 2 жыл бұрын
Senate
@maggarlion
@maggarlion 11 жыл бұрын
Okay he can placed on the Supreme Court Now.
@PIANOSEEDS
@PIANOSEEDS 10 ай бұрын
You know, Robert Bork sounds to have been a brilliant man, one who puts to shame a lot of the potential justices in their confirmation hearings, Alito and Kavanaugh being two examples. As a matter of fact, I remember his hearings, and even back then I didn't understand the ruckus the Democrats were making. Of course, I hadn't understood at that time that the Democrats were smearing him based on the fact that they didn't want ANY Republican nominee to be confirmed, that it wouldn't have mattered WHO was nominated; the Democrats were going to gang up on them. How far we've sunk.
@davidabesadze6786
@davidabesadze6786 2 жыл бұрын
'Supreme Revenge':))
@dobermanpac1064
@dobermanpac1064 3 жыл бұрын
NOTHING had changed!!
@gloriadouglas5968
@gloriadouglas5968 2 жыл бұрын
Congress
@donsanders3703
@donsanders3703 Жыл бұрын
But for evil men in the Senate Robert Bork would have been the greatest Jurist our country has ever known. Special place in hell for those who discredited him.
@jameswoods5709
@jameswoods5709 4 жыл бұрын
Never voted Democrat again after this hearing.... he was a great jurist.
@iam...7467
@iam...7467 7 жыл бұрын
10:32 14:47
@dorothypugh2614
@dorothypugh2614 Жыл бұрын
Alas, some bedroom activity becomes public when an abortion is sought. And what about contraceptives, which laws prohibited once? Had the Founders ever considered the possibility that the government would someday interfere with doctors' treatment of patients? Would they have approved? Of course, there is also the issue of abortions being illegal in the 18th and 19th centuries mainly because they killed so many women; were newer justifications for making them illegal on the Founders' minds? These tired old issues remain many years later when wisdom and common sense should have laid them to rest.
@biruss
@biruss Ай бұрын
Lemons were used as contraception in 1790
@paleo704
@paleo704 3 жыл бұрын
Bork was an amazing man with an amazing mind
@paulolima4393
@paulolima4393 2 жыл бұрын
He supported segregation.
@razaahmad9133
@razaahmad9133 Жыл бұрын
@@paulolima4393 he specifically argues in favor of Brown here
@baronsecuna
@baronsecuna 4 жыл бұрын
Bork went ahead and fired the prosecutor...and no one in that office would have felt any threat or pressure...nothing got in the wya...hahahahaha ...
@billyoder9813
@billyoder9813 3 жыл бұрын
7:00 Alan Simpson was hilarious
@ansar714
@ansar714 3 жыл бұрын
Bork was a nut.
@Sarah-vr7yh
@Sarah-vr7yh 10 ай бұрын
Station XI, Meditation: Recall how Jesus lies down upon His Cross , and how He extends His arms to offer up the sacrifice of His life for our salvation. The soldiers nail Him, hands and feet, to His gibbet. And then they raise it, leaving Him to die upon it in terrible anguish.
@Sarah-vr7yh
@Sarah-vr7yh 10 ай бұрын
Justice Alito belongs , as he speaks, here.
@Sarah-vr7yh
@Sarah-vr7yh 10 ай бұрын
Nashville Music Row.
@Sarah-vr7yh
@Sarah-vr7yh 10 ай бұрын
4-6
Supreme Revenge: Robert Bork, Jr. Interview
32:10
FRONTLINE PBS | Official
Рет қаралды 33 М.
Samuel Alito: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK Institute
21:47
Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate
Рет қаралды 50 М.
THE POLICE TAKES ME! feat @PANDAGIRLOFFICIAL #shorts
00:31
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
БОЛЬШОЙ ПЕТУШОК #shorts
00:21
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
A Conversation with Judge Robert H. Bork 6-26-07
1:04:12
The Federalist Society
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Sonia Sotomayor: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK Institute
17:58
Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate
Рет қаралды 82 М.
Is America doomed? - with Robert Bork (1996) | THINK TANK
25:44
American Enterprise Institute
Рет қаралды 4,1 М.
Full Sen. Franken questioning of Judge Gorsuch
29:25
CNN
Рет қаралды 538 М.
Anthony Kennedy: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK Institute
14:00
Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate
Рет қаралды 36 М.
ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER: A Conversation with Robert Bork
26:30
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 52 М.
Supreme Revenge (full documentary) | FRONTLINE
53:19
FRONTLINE PBS | Official
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
David Souter: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK Institute
11:02
Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate
Рет қаралды 29 М.
Why Sen. Lindsey Graham Believes the Supreme Court Confirmation Process Is “Broken”
29:01