Also.... further = fyodr

"Bow ugh cough" That made me laugh!

was about to comment that as well

Thanks

"Wandering" = wondering For those who were wandering by this comment and wondered what it meant

@@NedIsMysterio lmao not once

@@NedIsMysterio I think you need to read the comment again :p

@@NedIsMysterio not the first guy asking the question

@@NedIsMysterio can you read?

That is because he grew up in a country without fluoride in the water

Or Smarting UP??🤔🙄

@@need2know739 probably a grad student plant who didn't get enough of Petersons meat

He serves up a lot of meat when he's talking. People are hungry

@Karl Hall nom nom nom

@@MuthaTucka me. I'm not here for the material ( hidden agenda)

That sounds like a rather fulfilling life you’re having there! I bet you have some good stories! Also I do love how intelligent and articulate Dr. Peterson is, he has a way of explaining things so you can understand them without over-simplifying them.

Thank you for your service, wishing you good health.

@@jackgonzales-alexander1104 He does indeed have a way of communicating complex in simpler terms. Throughout my life I’ve followed great teachers but none better than Dr. Peterson.

@@stroys7061 It’s interesting that the left’s so-called “academia” does the opposite. They try to use complex terms to give a veneer of credibility to their inane ideas. “White fragility” “Cisnormativity” “Climate justice” “Microaggressions” “Internalized misogyny” “Gender-affirming surgery” “Trans-exclusionary radical feminist” All of these concepts are the intellectual equivalents of garbage, but they sure do sound sophisticated to the average person.

Carefully, quickly, tactfully, and educated beyond most anyone he encounters. Finally a man that at first in appearance would surprise you, then how endearing and thought provoking his engagements become.

There is a movie made based on the book . Excellent movie I must say. You can find it on youtube with English subtitles.

Bulgakov is great, I read Master at least 3 times. There is one more layer invisible for those who did not grow up in USSR, there are plenty of cultural references of early USSR that makes this story even more bizzare. I dont even comprehend how one can translate "квартирный вопрос" or "починяю примуса". Its all culturally encoded. I myself feel regret that I cant get other nations literature or art in full as I dont have that cultural reference unfortunately.

You can get it like contemporary natives if you study the culture of that time I think. think about what kind of background you need to culturally interpret them , and apply that to other countries. its more effort for sure but can be done. doesnt take that much background I believe. the most difficult part is getting the correct cultural meaning of words that are not used in speech, but that’s difficult even for your native language

@@sshreddderr9409 here its not really a words that is difficult to translate but general use of language as early USSR went thru huge cultural revolution when the whole new society was created on top of the debrees of the old society. Communism came with its own linguistics and thats what is difficult for adaptation as there are things that do not exists in capitalistic society. Those two societies are almost polar opposits.

@@AndreyKuzin from Canada. I have zero knowledge about these writers or their works to share but just today I was trying to read some translations from Russian language (from a latest atrocity in the Ukraine viewpoint) and I couldn’t understand a lot of them for quite a while until I figured out their ‘slang’ context, well sort of figured it out!! I might add we spell this word you use debris, but it is pronounced the way you spelled it

Sure. That's why people loved Hitler, too. {1} A classified record doesn't automatically revert to an unclassified status even 'presumptively' except by specific presidential directive. {2} The relevant statute isn't the Presidential Records Act, but 18 U.S.C. 793(e). And that re. national defense info, classified or not. "(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, ... relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation,...or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody... (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody...and fails to make prompt report of such loss,...to his superior officer- Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." Summa summarum: guilty. n.b. It's not a question of classification under 793e. Rather, "(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, ... relating to the national defense," etc. Whether the documents removed from the premises earlier, or the fruits of crime under the aegis of this recent search warrant, were declassified or not (and the only evidence they were seems to be on the word of one Cash Patel [sp?]), in terms of definitions within the statute the subject of the warrant is still in unlawful posession of such documents. The classification issue is moot. slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/08/facts-caught-donald-trump-documents.html The presidential records act is not specifically referenced in the affidavit establishing probable cause and is inapplicable. Note: www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/31/2.2 Title 31 - Money and Finance: Treasury Subtitle A - Office of the Secretary of the Treasury PART 2 - NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION § 2.2 Access to classified information by historical researchers, former Treasury Presidential and Vice Presidential appointees, and former Presidents and Vice Presidents. 31 CFR § 2.2 - Access to classified information by historical researchers, former Treasury Presidential and Vice Presidential appointees, and former Presidents and Vice Presidents. § 2.2 Access to classified information by historical researchers, former Treasury Presidential and Vice Presidential appointees, and former Presidents and Vice Presidents. (a) Access to classified information may be granted only to individuals who have a need-to-know the information. This requirement may be waived, however, for individuals who: (1) Are engaged in historical research projects; (2) Previously occupied a position in the Treasury to which they were appointed by the President under 3 U.S.C. 105(a)(2)(A), or the Vice President under 3 U.S.C. 106(a)(1)(A); or (3) Served as President or Vice President Access to classified information may be granted to individuals described in paragraph (a) of this section upon: (1) A written determination by Treasury's Senior Agency Official, under Section 5.4(d) of Executive Order 13292, that access is consistent with the interest of the national security; and (2) Receipt of the individual's written agreement to safeguard classified information, including taking all appropriate steps to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure or compromise. This written agreement must also include the individual's consent to have any and all notes (including those prepared or stored in electronic media, whether written or oral) reviewed by authorized Treasury personnel to ensure that no classified information is contained therein and, if so, that the classified information is not published. --------------------------------------

what does Hitler have to do with JP...you can't even remotely compare the two..thats absurd..anyone with Hitlers mentality would do anything to have a political position and power and Instinctively reverts to immediate punishment for anything and is about Group power and dominance..JP is about individual improvement- aim to be committed to a partner- aim for goals to be a productive contributer to the community

@@jamesbarlow6423 tell me you have TDS without telling me you have TDS….

@@hawks7775 What came first? Hitler hatred of a specific group? Or a love of what is Good? (People assume Hitler was a simply power-hungry and maniacal, but that is doing history a disservice. After seeing the rampant drug abuse, prostitution, hedonism, child abuse, etc of Weimar Republic, he set out to expose the cause of such degeneracy…..)

@@jamesbarlow6423 oof what a goober. Tell us more, the suspense is killing all of us. Here’s a little half court shot for you without getting winded. “No weapon formed”... unfortunately for you and the people that took that giant dump in your head, the only way to stop what’s coming is to blatantly and openly commit federal crimes that cost you everything. Actual things like treason, sedition (again), insurrection (again)... Edit: and this time it crumbles from within. In a big way.

What's it about and why is it so good? 🤔

@@harold_Shitmum It's about the Devil descending on Russia and wreaking havoc on the population through deception and cruelty. It's an allegory of Stalin's tyranny on his own people and a critique of intelligentsia that allowed him to gain power.

@@harold_Shitmumits a rediculous and unconventional story about the devil visiting Moscow during stalins era. Hysterically funny, anti stalinist, pro Jesus themes. Written by a man who would be murdered by the Russian state if anyone found the writing. You can feel his desperation to express himself while living in a terrifying culture that won't allow artists to express themselves.

@@harold_Shitmum Its a bit similiar to "Faust" Gette but different. Its Roman(but not so stupid like Martin Iden/Jack London) .its about fate, its about people nature. Its about 2 sides of humanity. Its have a bit Niztche ideas. For example Devil(Voland) saying such thing:"The problem is not that humans are mortal/can die.The problem is that smt they are suddenly mortal/can die." Nizche said "Somebody dying too early,smb dying to late.Its sounds strange to die in time"

@@harold_Shitmum a devil comes to 1930th Moscow city with lots of adventures anr philosophy

🤣 i spotted that aswell

Bulgakov didn't deserve that

Not to mention the great Further Dostoyevsky.

Mikhail Bulgakov, Fjodor Dostoevsky -- c'mon, they don't deserve that.

@@Bruva_Ayamhyt Dostojevskij

I ve always wondered if non russian people could understand this book at all.

@@trimmerish everyone can understand it, its pure art after all, but in russian its on another level.

@@IDandelionI No, the point of this book is that most people don't understand this book. Bulgakov ridicules the Soviet society which considers itself enlightened.

@@trimmerish The first time i read it i lacked the knowledge to get most cultural /historical references..names.. ETC. It didn't help in understanding this novel, haha:) .. Was a young student of literature, creative writing, i'm not from Russia or any former republic of the USSR. I'm from Sweden. I read it again a few years later but this time i had studied Russian history pretty heavily for almost two years and this time i was ready with annotations from two sources that were great to have readily available whilst reading this novel .. Anytime i was required further explanation i just checked those notes for assistance. Both my studies of history and these annotations to check whenever ignorant helped make my 2nd read of this brilliant novel a much more enjoyable experience..

I found this book on a community bookshelf in a hostel in Lima, Peru. It was in English. I read it twice in about two weeks and really enjoyed it. I'm sure there were a bunch of deep political points that I didn't understand, but it was still fun.

I am going to find the audio book for this

@@JamesMooreMarketing yes Sir, but I implore you to grab a hard copy as well.

"Dog's heart" is better

Is it like 50 shades of gray?

@@leavenleaven691 50 shades of Satan

only the movie

Yes, movie is perfect

A young doctors notebook, white guard

@@user-od4yl3rf4n white guard is the best. Stalin loved it

I laughed so hard!!! I’m guessing it was name of famous Russian? Bogokov or something? Either way I knew the subtitles were soooo wrong!

​@@jackgonzales-alexander1104 FYI it was Mikhail Bulgakov

@@Toredos_4242 ty!

That some blood/crip shit?

I didn’t notice until I saw this comment 😂 Not sure how I’m missed that!

The cool thing - we are reading all this books in school at literature.(we are not choosing lessones so everybody read more or less). BUT some books like Dostoevskiy better read when you are not child... If you are 12-4 years its can be not easy to understand the full ideas in his books and why he is genious.

@Leonhard Euler devils

Trust me as a native: you don't want to read Dostoyevsky in Russian. His writing is so complex, language-wise, that many Russians have trouble making sense of his texts.

@@amalkatrazz for real ? He’s in the high school course

@@imranragimov7781 he definitely is, but that doesn't mean it's an easy read for highschoolers.

Negative plus negative is equal...

​@@GranSinderesisNegative...

@@GranSinderesis multiplication my dude, come on

??????? You know very little.

Did at least one of them not present Russian names property in Latin? Of as Russian dialecto of English?

Push yourself further. I assume you've mastered linear algebra?

Do you mean Sufi literature?

@@beverlycarswell5291 i have studied sufi literature, at least enough to understand there's nothing fundamentally different about it than the greek philosophical ideologies, which goes more in line with christianity than islam. Salafi literatures are what i mean by islamic literature, nothing else represent the true message of Islam, not even remotely. The absolute worst are the writings of modern day political activists like Syed Qutub, Hassan al Banna and Moududi, these are the ideologues to the modern day extremist renegades like alqaeda, isis, or even the socio-political organisations like hijbut tahrir, muslim brotherhood, jamat islami, hamas, hizbullah, the khomenites of Iran and many others like them spread around the world, the entirety of Al-Jazeera's propaganda revolves around this ideology.

@@Afif.anNayem.asSalafi Ah, I see.

@@jabbathehut1871 i have not mastered linear algebra, no. I've studied law in the UK and have done quite a bit of research in history, theology and psychology. I also have a general degree in military studies, as that is what was required as part of my commission into the military in my country.

I went through all places which were mentioned in the book in one day. That was really cool!

I'm from Sweden but I've been to many regions of Russia for work and other parts of the country while just traveling for leisure..vacationing. My experience is that Ruskies are good, honest people and I have been shown a lot of hospitality and kindness over there. Makes me sad to see their people vilified (even more than they already were) because of the war they've been dragged into .. demonized w/ vast generalizations by spoiled westerners with no experience of living under a dictatorship, westerners that probably never have talked with or gotten to know anyone from Russia. Outright racist takes from hypocritical progressive leftie types as well.. very stupid. very 2022.

@@LoudnessJP that dictatorship is the unironically future for this world. Because Russia and China don't want to end this fancy USA-lead capitalism, they want to take seats in first wagons. Comprehend? It won't "turn back as it was". Although it'd be greatly better than perish in hellfires.

Podobnie, mam trzy egzemplarze - dwa różne polskie tłumaczenia i oryginał.

The further you Dostoevsky, the more you ugh, cough.

And the more respect you have to Dostojevskij the less he's "Dostoevsky" and more Fôdor Mihajkovič.

This is strange I sent it to Spanish girl in Spanish and she didn't understand it I mean girls don't understand it or just non slavs lol

The book is about the fact that everyone died and went to hell, but no one noticed this, even most readers do not understand this. This book shows Soviet citizens.

@@radziwill7193 the book shows people in the whole that they're not changing from Jesus times until today but then the paradox that there're people like Margarita and Master who love each other through everything. The love saves the world.

@@user-sk6kj8ju7y You don't know Bulgakov well, his literature is depressing. All of his main characters end up with a bad ending. And going to hell forever is a bad ending.

@@radziwill7193 of course I just studied different Bulgakov during 9 years at school. They're not going to hell "Lovers will find peace in their eternal home" This is the phrase from book. In what language did you read it? The sense of the novel is that to convey people a simple thing - good and evil are inseparable from each other. A good person can do bad things and vice versa. (Margarita even during the Satan celebrations did bad and then good things) Sometimes we ourselves don't know whether our actions will lead to good or bad consequences (Judas, Pilate, holy Peter, Margarita, Ivan etc). But one way or another, any person should decide for himself and make a choice. And be responsible for this choice (just like Bulgakov who went from Kiev to Soviets to fight against new Ukrainian government).

@@radziwill7193 his literature isn't depressing it's just a reality.

Spot on! Well, actually Master and Margarita were also quite decent!

There’s a documentary on JP on Amazon prime I believe. He give a tour of his home and speaks on a lot of the art around the house.

So sad that the leftist have jettisoned Vonnegut for woke pap

Annushka already spilled the oil ... (I know this novel in Russian and in Polish, so I can only imagine, that in English it would sound more or less like that :) )

Reading Solženicyn is reading politically-motivated sewage, in the form of revenge of offspring of the former master of life against the very bad country, that dared to dispose the "so needed" landlords

Lol. He literaly has no knowledge on socialism and the soviet history. The man didn't even read Marx until a year ago. He has failed to do his due diligence in checking his sources and spread a massive amount of disinformation.

@@Cyborg_Lenin Hello mate, I agree with you, I have searched more about him and what he knows about this, I feel a fool agreeing to him before, after you read this, if you ever do, I'll erase this comment for pure embarrassment for not knowing enough

@@ivarivanovich Dont worry bro, i was the same, believed this guy on everything before realising that he knows nothing. Went from neolib to socialist real quick.

@@Cyborg_Lenin Yeah mate, same for me, anyways, at least we both see things more clearly than before, I am even thinking of editting the comment to correct it and prove that he isn't correct

You an print it out. Unless its a sculpture a lot of it was made accessible for the masses. That was kinda the point.