Yep, I unsubbed.

@@billytheweasel This channel is unbiased in its reviews and this is rare.

@@palacete it’s approach the Russian troll channel it tries to be on biased to attract viewers

@@palacete that would be game changing

Germany had it's own game changer in ww2 by the name wonder weapons

and russia somehow doesn’t say propaganda?? Kyiv in 3 days lmao. Also that 2000 number includes damaged and abandoned or captured and stolen tanks, not just destroyed. Around 550 russian tanks have actually been destroyed while remaining 1500 are damaged causing them to be inoperable of some sort

Opinions don’t really matter when we have access to open source intelligence though.

@@liddz434 and what “intelligent” source is that?

Obviously you’re oblivious to anything considered remotely intelligent or discerning 😅

samr=e as ruzzian propaganda, but less heavy on the ridiculousness

* blown up*

@@LaGrandeBayou LOL. That told u pootin am I right?? Or telegram?

@@LaGrandeBayou I don’t believe ur ruzzian propaganda

@@LaGrandeBayou BINGO!

@@RustyBear Why do you call him pootin would you rather sleep with Sleepy Joe I mean Putin atleast worked out when he was in the KGB never seen a US president get baptized somethings not right you must support child trafficing because man does hollywood and DC not support the Sound of Freedom movie man wake up.

RUSSIAN TANKS ARE JUST A KIND OF FRYPAN

​@@lutya1192 Man Leorpads tank just only tiny skinny ass cat that has been destroyed by Ka52 and minefield.

They are, however they cannot be applied in the fashion they are meant to. Multiple reasons, amongst them inadequte demimin and not enough airforce capabilities. Like using a hammer to drill holes. It wont work.

​@@naufalprasetya6133At Least they didnt get destroyed by a homemade drone

@@naufalprasetya6133 u mean : got disabled by minefield. The KA-52 got destroyed by MANPADS ;)

😄

and both can easily destroy bradleys and leopard 1s

They actually can 1 hit leapords lol

They're good for fire support but not on head on battle

@@RonaldoFanIndeed Any update on the conviction of Colonel Alexander Denisov who was stealing engines from T-90 tanks then sending them to Ukraine front??? He sold the engines to local Russians to be used as generators.

They are great targets for drones too

Don't forget the leopards too! Lancet loves those

​@@mrwilson7617 Nothing beats the lovestory between a Lancet drone and a Leopard-2 tank.

@@dmitrit.4862except they've only managed to kill very few and disable about the same number. The eventually, when Germany stops being incompetent and rebuilds em', they'll just be back in the field. Something that none of the piece of shit Russian tanks can pull off. 🤣

Как это поможет России? 🤣

кремлебот научился копипастить.

​@@alekseiruin6772хохлобот с самого детства любишь срать в комментариях

@@prosto_chilloviy677 ты не прав, кремлебот. Я за Россию. Но кремлеботы с бц Лахта-2 на ул Оптиков это такие конченные быдлы, что они обязаны ответить.

I farted an it don't stink😂

Hahaha the mass losses of Russian soldiers being sent forth like cattle haven't quite made it to you have they? Russia lost A LOT of men in the war, they didn't fight very effective, not like how the Germans fought. The "not one step back" order was issued. But yeah, if they tell you at school Russia is the no.1 superpower in the world that just happens to struggle with their "two weeks" invasion of Ukraine just believe them

Its not a war, its still a special operations. This is not the patriotic war, Putin is not Stalin, Russia is not the USSR. The entire country is not mobilized to fight this war. Putin is fighting this war with one of his eyes on the Russian people, and on his possible rivals,

Hey Ivan fanboy I am sorry to ripp you out of your Dreams but do you know anything about history and reality? Because because a lot of your statements are incorrect.

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 How? The largest battles in WW2 were on the eastern front. Russian and Chinese weapons are much faster and cheaper to manufacture whereas American weapons are complicated and expensive so contractors make more money.

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 The only thing he said that was incorrect, Cosplay-Castro fanboy, was his use of the term "the Russian Red Army." It was NOT "Russian," it was as much Ukrainian and Belorusian as Russian... whether you like that fact or not.

If what you say is true then the MICs failed the American people.

West combines quality with quantity. Like the sherman, Sure there was slightly less sherman’s than T34 but they were way better than T34 and they had more sherman’s than german had panzers/tigers. By the way The USA alone has 2500 ACTIVE abrams while Russia has only 2000 ACTIVE tanks including T72/T80/T90. Russia counts inoperable broken tanks as their fleet lmao. Otherwise I think you’re licking putins feet.

Except Tanks that are integrated with an air defense system like Russia's.

Yea Russian corruption and greed is the reason the Russian military sucks so bad.

Agree, I unsubbed. Too much propaganda and bad information here.

is it 1 guy? i suppose its more than one but yeah... i guess they cant cheat with t90m so much because there are less of those. wonder how much fake data did they produce with more numerous tank types

The guy who puts unknown vehicles as Russian if original video or photo is from the POV of a Ukrainian strike, and it goes into Ukraine if the original is from a Russian POV. The guy who does count lancet and Ka-52 strikes, and the guy who removes duplicates using geolocation and will quickly correct any repeat that makes it through. Nice cope though

If you took the time to investigate, you'd know that every one of your allegations, is complete nonsense. Oryx has one of the absolute best methods of verification of any similar reporting, And it's not a "guy", but a team of people. They report on conflict losses all over the globe, not just in Ukraine. They use a number of different verification techniques. But let's talk about your claims. When there are a dozen clearly identified Russian vehicles in an obvious position of a formation and one vehicle that is no longer identifiable as to what it is, whose vehicle do you think it is?? Argentinian? Of course it's Russian!! As for double counting, multiple verification techniques are used including geolocation information, Satellite imagery, and other location related information such as historical imagery from different days and times. It's a lot more thorough than you imply. As for what weapons systems brought about the demise of a target, that isn't so easy to identify. Someone might post a claim of credit to a Ka-52 for example, but if there is not enough to verify that, why would you just trust the claim? It is this exact same verification logic that make Oryx data reliable. They don't deal in opinions, they use what they can best verify as factual data. Can they make mistakes? Yes, but it's low probability, and that's going to happen without bias. People much smarter than you, who have more resources available, have concluded that these guys are overall the best and most reliable. Generally, their data runs a bit behind real time because the take the efforts to verify every data point. If a T90 gets mis-identified as a T72, that's really a minor error which does not impact credibility. If the same tank that was listed as damaged later ends up as destroyed, it's going to be hard to catch that. Likewise if a Russian tank get's captured and later gets identified as a Ukrainian loss, does that corrupt the data? I don't see it that way and it's possible for both sides to have lost the same specific tank. That kind of thing is insignificant enough to have little impact on the overall database.

These organisations like the so called orix are controlled and just like UN they powerless against the US and bias

yes, Oryx has been doing this since civil war in Syria. they're not that reliable.

На Т90м уже идут работы с подвеской, говорят что будет 20-30км/ч

Little did you know that all mighty russian military never retreats..they just turn around and continue to advance..so no need for better reverse xD

@@piirakkaliisa8340 Sounds like what Prigozhin did

​@@piirakkaliisa8340Like in Kharkov, Kherson and now around Bakhmut after month of taking it after a year? 😂

Hehe, you better stop swallowing gov controlled western mainstream news straight down without thinking. Russia are still only have military operation in Ukraine, as Putin said in every speech, Russia have a goal to demilitarized Ukraine completely. And wipe out US trained soldiers and western weapons. As Putin said after biden admits that he wanted to weakening Russia and have a regime change, it's not Ukraine who's Russia's real enemy. US are Russia's main enemy, you are aware of it's still military operation ? Russia have not decided to declare any war against Ukraine, neither have Ukraine against Russia. US are using Ukraine and their nato alliance trying to weakening Russia, yes. Did you know that obama already in 2008 gave green light to start working on getting control over Ukraine ? Jeffrey Sachs said it, he was shocked. Because he knew US crossing Russia's red line. Responsible politicians in Washington also knew that, it was their plan. After US successfully had their presidential coup in Ukraine 2014. US started training and prepare Ukrainian military for this tragic proxywar trying to weakening Russia together with sanctions. US was confident that they would crush Russia with sanctions and kicking Russia out of SWIFT payment system. So US blocked the world trade with Russia. Well, sadly for US Russia of course knew what US working on and planned. So Russia already had their own payment system without using dollar together with China bank. So that the world freely could trade with Russia, and it's nothing US could do about it. US failed with absolutely everything they trying to weakening Russia with. Russia and Ukraine are the two largest bread basket countries in the world, that's why US trying to weakening Russia. Control over the food and energy that the world needs from Russia and Ukraine. US would managed to get control over the world 🌎 But They ending up weakening themselves dollar and Europe more. Heard 41 new countries want to join BRICS alliance and use their new payment system without using dollar 💵 That's why responsible politicians and globalist elites are so desperate right now, what's going on geopolitical just now. Are really serious for US, world didn't like US cynical plan using Ukraine and sanctions trying to weakening Russia. So this tragic proxywar make US much more weaker, everything is going wrong way for US. Jeffrey Sachs says that he is not surprised, he said US have had over 100 war's around the world since 1991. And still threatening with economic sanctions if they don't support US interest trying to get control over Russia. 43 countries have US sanctions against just now. biden administration are freezing themselves from the rest of the globe. That's a fact, do some research on BRICS expansion, you understand what I am talking about.

That is because you do not understand the sanctions. It is impossible to fully block off russia from buying chips. Right now russia goes out of their way to buy it through other countries. Somewhat less quantities, higher prices. Not a total block

​@@appakingggsomebody gets it. Good thing you made a point to say that before these nerds start coming up with conspiracies

​@@lucasbaxter5850What's wrong with nerds? nerds are good at whatever they dedicate time to do. 😁👍🏼

Yeah it's called China and Iran

​@@appakinggg Most chips in the world are made by a company in Taiwan called TSMC. They have a near monopoly whne it comes to the most advanced most cutting edge chips. Probably more than 90 of the 100 most advanced chips nearest to you, we're all made in Taiwan by a company called TSMC. They make the chips of Apple, most Androids, Nvidia, AMD, the even make some chips for Intel. Even China relies on Taiwan for advanced chips. The chip shortage of a while ago...it was because of this one single company. South Korea produces most of the rest of the chips. Most military countries make their own military chips, because older manufacturing processes are more robust for military grade chips. In other words, cutting edge manufacturing is too delicate for military purposes. When it was discovered that the US used back doors in Intel chips to spy on their own allies, everyone switched to locally made chips, if possible. Russia did this too...their government PCs use chips that's based on Intel's abandoned Itanium architecture, that they manufacture themselves.

Tell that to the dead Ukrainians

Shit, that much? Well that explains why russia haven't gained ANY of its objectives :)

Compare to the Russian government & defense mouth piece western media are more accurate & truthful. 😂😂😂

@@tombombadil8709 1) To "de-nazify" Ukraine 2) To de-militarize Ukraine 3) To stop NATO expansion 4) To sieze all of Ukraine 5) To sieze Ukraine in a few days 6) Failed to establish air dominance 7) Failed to establish beach-heads 8) Sending two non-aligned countries (Finland & Sweden) to join NATO- etc etc - then his objectives changed to take smaller parts of land, only to lose over 50% of the stolen land in a Ukranian blitzattack . Ukraine is now armed more than ever and he's risking losing even Crimea thanks to his stupid tactics. All this "being the second strongest army" and "having superior weapons". His airforce is hiding behind the borders. His black sea fleet having to flee its home port. Sinking of his black sea flagship. I (and any army) call that an utter failure. 🤣

Finally some truthful reporting.

Exactly only proper armour they have are wood loggs 😂

@@Toulkun leopards proper armour doesn't save it from lancet lmao

They were already tested in Iraq, and they were popped like nasty zits with ease by USA. This got reinforced in Ukraine where Russian tanks are being destroyed by the thousands.

@@Toulkun So you are saying that the Ukrainians and all of NATO is so incompetent that they cannot defeat an enemy that uses wood logs as a defense.

​@@Toulkunу тебя нет мозга,как ты живёшь?!😂

Ukrainians have nothing to loose?😂

go buy all their junk equipment then to go with your junk military

A pajeet supporting a giant that fails it's "Special operation" miserably.

Don’t you have some telescam calls to be making…?

​@@Andzrej_Polska😂😂😂 я в шоке бываю от таких заявлений 😂 Россия воюет против всего блока нато во глове с сша !! У Украины даже своих патрон не осталось !! Украина уже давно проиграла бы как минимум раз 10 !! НАТО уже пожалела что вязалась в эту войну !! Уже многоюие натовские страны воют от бессилия !! И от того что у них не осталось оружия !

Who cares what India thinks?

In your Dreams maby reality is different as the war in Ukraine shows

They didn't say nothing about game changer like the Ukrainians

Their tactics are fine, and their doctrine. THis is not hearts of iron 4 btw. This is reality. The problem is the western digitalized totalitarian dictatorships sending all their equipment to a foreign country which has a insane corruption problem and isnt even in nato. They also fund neo nazis in their own army. Thats the problem.

The numbers are wrong, we got video evidence of 5-30 tank Ukraine tanks destroyed by artillery, mines, Lancet drones, Ka-52 attack helicopters, MLRS missile barrages daily (nowadays they use again more tanks in the South, 80% are destroyed in these assaults) . Naturally the true loss is minimum twice, not everything recorded and showed. Infantry causes less than 5%. Ukraine uses Artillery and drones mainly from distance, not Anti tank infantry.

@@MolnarG007 if Ukraine was loosing equipment so hard,why isn't Russia in Kiev yet?

@@DeepSlice I live in NATO cou try but yes they sacrificed 40% of received Western armoured vehicles and tanks to press through. As i wrote minefield, missile barrages and complete air control is against them. The question how much they gain for this sacrifice. The attacker also always have bigger loses even when same artillery, air support present. The question isn't the equipment, it's manpower. Russia bigger, so they can use only contracted troops and volunteers, and using conscipts only in Russia for support transport, defense, etc. They get 1000 volunteers for money daily. Ukraine uses conscipts, 18-60, and those ready to do their duty are long joined. It's super bad that only those they must conscipt by force left, using vans, getting people from market, streets. I understand they must, but this show they are running out of men. Having losses 1 to 1 isn't enough, Russia got 4x numbers. This also proves their bravery.

​@@DeepSlice Do everyone with a functioning brain a favor, go to the closest bathroom, look in the mirror and promptly slap yourself.

The supply of US ATGMs is drying up. Not just for Ukraine, for everyone. The production lines literally have to be spun back up and that doesn't happen over night.

I disagree the USA alone out produces Russia and 10k porly maintained peaces will not change anything in the current situation

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 these 10К tanks most likely rotted and decommissioned, but enough new ones were made. Тhe view itself was impressive - so much metal and labor! I haven't seen so many before, it is crazy. If you ever were an infantryman stuck in a field in the mud after rain (happened to me once on training), and your tank (not the enemy) is spinning nearby - you feel like a fly in honey ... a shitty feeling to be in an open place next to the tank when you can't run or jump.

@@andreiminin4738 But even then the USA and NATO still easaly outprodouce Russia + they have far more and better equipment then Russia

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Potentially, after few years, USA and NATO may produce more than Russia because they have more resource but it requires time and reasonable prices that private companies don't like. In order to be able to produce more without breaking economy, military industry should be nationalized. Can you believe that? And who knows what happens few years later - may be it will be not needed? There is no heavy facilities for Abrams in USA - last one in Detroit was demolished in 2000th; no artillery for tanks - Germany produced it. It seems that most western counties moved to post modern, post industrial life style and all real business (engineering, industry) outsourced. The best business now is 1) cut energy and resources supplies from Russia to Europe and squeeze money from Europe by selling gas to it 2) sell old military equipment and ammunition instead of utilization - probably it explains why and how it goes as it goes.

And the last - no one wants real big war with nuclear heads - so it is just a business. While political situation is stable in Russia, there is no military option to win. Poor Ukrainians - they are just dying for someone's business.

No, that is maybe 3rd reason. You totally missed main reason.

the only lancet type drones Ukraine supposedly has is the switchblade 600 and we haven't seen much of them

Wholesome comment lol

there is arena s soft kill which no longer uses shtora jammers, it uses aerosol ammunition (basically very advanced smoke launchers) and a Russian tank is easier to get used to than a western one iirc

They recieve months of training on the T-90Ms on top of their years of experience with T-72B3Ms/T-80BVMs/T-90As.

Russia has an elite and experienced tank crews unlike ukraine

@@definitelyfrank9341 Who does?

All new Russian tanks are equipped with a domestically-produced sight which the media calls a Sosna-U copy. Sosna-U is Belarusian, by the way.

The channel RedEffect has a very interesting video analysing the production rate of T-90Ms, you should check it out. It's called something along the lines of "T-90M performance in Ukraine"

The t90 is just a renamed t72 and it is just as bad as it 💩🚽

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1you have no clue what are you talking about. You just said that Abrams is crappy tank: heavy, not great armor for that weight, fuel thirsty, all that with outdated 105mm gun.

@@BojanPeric-kq9et wrong comment section? It's about the t 90 and t72 not the abrams

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1I just paraphrased what you wrote about T-90 to American lingo.

@@BojanPeric-kq9et t90 and t72 were good for there time but that time has long been over And modernisation is very hard because of Russian corruption

I imagine the tankists just floating in the air while riding it lol

I love tanks tank but the truth is no tank is invisible , history make that very clear. But i adore the Russians approach on tank manufacturing. Cheap and efficient, easily used and repair and able to large scale manufacturing. This is very logical

Actually T14 Armata has Anti Thermal paint that makes it invisible to Thermal Equipments

​@@dulithasiriwardana8724Very logical if it works. Russia couldn't and still can't build a decent car. But now a new tank. Whatever.

Maybe they have but nobody has seen it lol 😅

Not to mention that its open-intel, can be redacted by anyone

@bobbman3000 1 second ago Can you find me a single entry in that list for a tank entry that is incorrect? Just one singular entry. You'll probably find one (it is impossible to be perfect when counting THAT many losses), but the time it would take for you to do that should help you realize. Oryx obviously has it's issues, but it's still a great source. WarSpotting is better though. They are much more thorough, it's regularly updated, and it's easier to sort stuff.

I've got a better idea : YOU take it upon YOURSELF to go trawling through those thousands of entries WITH AN OPEN, ENQUIRING MIND, at all times asking yourself "could this here tank in the distance be actually UNDAMAGED and INTACT ?" or "could this tank here be actually photographed before 2022?" or "could this plain green APC with no insignia in the distance belong to the other side?" You will find many like this. @@ImBigFloppa

That´s why they beg for old scrap all over the World...

According to Oryx based on photo evidence Ukraine lost 600 tanks in total and 400 tanks destroyed. So your figure is not correct! At the same time the Russian losses were 2173 tanks of which 1389 were total loss. Probably the russian losses are over 3000 by now, and they are bringing more ever older tanks! Also these losses are minimum that can be documented, so the losses are bigger. The funny thing is that there have been big celebrations by the russians that they knocked out 7-8 Leopard tanks, 2 total loss, rest be repaired, but they dont realize that at least 3000 russian tanks have been destroyed, by comparison. So after russian logic the russain tanks are better then the western tanks! Funny!

or how Russia is begging North Korea for artillery or Iran for drones or china for ceramic and other parts @@milangacik994

😅😅

I do not know how many tanks the Ukrainians have actually lost - it is larger that the 0 value you attribute to Oryx. Spending 30 seconds with google, this is what I found wrt Ukrainian tank losses according to Oryx: * 4 Leopard 2A4: (1, destroyed) (1, damaged) (2, damaged) (3, damaged) * 7 Leopard 2A6: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (1, damaged) (2, damaged) (3, damaged) (4, damaged) (1, damaged and abandoned) * 36 Unknown tank: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (3, destroyed) (4, destroyed) (5, destroyed) (6, destroyed) (7, destroyed) (8, destroyed) (9, destroyed) (10 and 11, destroyed) (12, destroyed) (13, destroyed) (14, destroyed) (15, destroyed) (16, destroyed) (17, destroyed) (18, destroyed) (19, destroyed) (20, destroyed) (21, destroyed) (22, destroyed) (23, destroyed) (24, destroyed) (25, destroyed) (26, destroyed) (27, destroyed) (28, destroyed) (29, destroyed) (30, destroyed) (31, destroyed) (32, destroyed) (33, destroyed) (34, destroyed) (35, destroyed) (1, damaged)

i think there is a new gearbox in development that allows for speed to go up to 15km/h

​@@ligmasurvivor5600 у новых т90м 18км, у модернизированных т90а 4км, ещё у новых более мощный двигатель

a source that has the evidence to back it up like Russia they would say they destroyed 100 himars and u believe that but when actual video evidence comes to light and how bad Russia is losing u say oryx is fake my guy please before u speak try not make yourself look like a total dumbass btw the russian nazis have lost over 11,000 tanks while Ukraine has only lost 3,900 and thats confirmable by video and photo proof.

And you believe the news and ukrainioid propaganda lol ... The ukrainioids are losing badly...

Believing the most reliable resource on vehicle losses by far is sad? Should the Kremlin be believed? Should the Ukrainian government be believed?

@@ImBigFloppa who called it reliable? The MSM from the west. There is no consensus that oryx is correct. Only western sources. Quote oryx because it fits their narrative. Multiple different forums have found highly questionable data on the site. Like they captured 500+ tanks yet they still had no tanks to do an offensive? That would seem odd, they should have an abundance of extra tanks or all those tanks have been destroyed. Ukraine literally said they were out tanks and had to wait for tanks from western colonizers because they had so few. Where is oryx data on those 500+ tanks that seem to be unaccounted for.

@@ImBigFloppa это тот самый орикс который русский танк получил царапину : оу , русский танк уничтожен украинский танк разлетелся на куски : его отремонтируют и вернут в строй ну как такому не верить )))

Приложи к башке мокрое полотенчико.

@@Slava_Mitrofanov Логика не твоя сильная сторона

​@@radekslar3576Логика? Откуда у тебя сведения о 2100 уничтоженных российский танков? Это тебе сказали те же самые люди которые тебе обещали европейские зарплаты после майдана? И ты опять им веришь? Ответь лучше на простой вопрос. У Украины было около 3000 советских танков на 2021 год. Залужный попросил 600 иностранных танков для контрнаступа. Вопрос: зачем ему эти танки если есть 3000 советских? Куда они делись? Сгорели на поле боя, да?

Вы неправильно прочитали мой комментарий. Я, наоборот, насмехаюсь над информацией о тысячах уничтоженных русских танков. Я пишу, что в том видео есть сообщение о большем количестве уничтоженных танков, чем развернутых русскими.

@@radekslar3576 Тогда извините за невнимательность 👍

Is this a joke

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1это твой мозг - шутка

So are the western tanks just the way it is really

​@@00shakz12Western tanks are far more advanced ofc because west is more technolicaly advance and Russia doesnt produce any of own components. Western tanks are usually not lost only tracks get destroyed which can be repaired and thats what happend with Leopards in Zaporozia and it was due to heavy mine fields and artillery strikes. Meanwhile first T 90 was lost around Kharkiv year ago 😂

@@Toulkun oh shut up there are loads of vids of western tanks burning,if they why are Ukraine begging more tanks lol work it out.....

@@Toulkun Russia produces all of it's own components idiot.

​@@Toulkun🥱🤦‍♂️

Nice delusions you have there😉

I don't think this guy understand warfare and logistics

Russia only has 2…T-72BM/T-90 and T-80…but T-80 is only used as reserve and taken out of the mainline after Chechnya disaster. US has M1 Abrams series (A1, A2, A2 SEP, A2 SEPV3/4 etc). Each nation has different military doctrines - and the US knows what they are doing.

кремлебот научился пользоваться гугл транслейт.

T-52? LOL. You forgot to add Leopard 1, Leopard 2, Challenger 2 and Abrams to your list of "burners".

USSR not Russia.

​@@hisvinyes Russia is not USSR but Russia inherited almost everything of USSR

@@pieman9 Entire West now is weaker than Germany then during WWII. Germany was ruling almost entire Europe BTW... West is nto finances, Russia into units. War is about units not about finances.

@@gostan2718 Inherited nothing...Have half the population, USSR has so I don't see what you're argument is. Corruption? Yes, it's top notch in Russia. Socialism? Nope, it's a capitalist state with a great gaps between the poors and the richs. So please explain?

​@@pieman9If we check the numbers of equipment/soldiers we need 1.5 more germany to have more than the modern day numbers. Most NATO countries did not spent much money on their army in the past years..

1940s tech as in, tech that even the M1A2 SEPV2 lacks? Such as a battlefield management system, an APU, 3rd generation thermal sights for both the gunner and commander, 360° camera coverage etc etc?

Yes you right, it’s better to have expensive super modern Leopards which… explode because of Lancets anyway

"Managing statistics" - ie lying......

*Soviet managers really knew how to manage factories, they were able to move more than 3,000 factories and about 5 million workers beyond the Urals in 1941 in a short time, and already in 1943, Soviet industry was able to break the back of the industry of the European Union, led by Nazi Germany, so draw conclusions dude, unless you're an idiot with a broken brain!*

US managers are good at "price control", that is paying common coffee machine like it is built from titanium.

The money is from Russian people's bank accounts 😂😂😂😂

Lmaooo what tf does that have to do with it😂

No got bless Ukraine and condem the Russian government for there crimes

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1это например какие «преступления»?

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1what crimes? Invading sovereign country?

If the Russians are so brilliant, then why did several backhoes, some dynamite, and some shoulder mounted rockets stop them at Kiev's suburbs? Also, the current top Chess Grandmaster is Magnus Carlsen, who is from Norway. The top Russian is ranked fifth.

@@dougstong5723 or the fact that Wagner has been a better fighting force than Russias actual army

@@lucasbaxter5850 Yes, it takes real bravery to send Russian convicts (with little training) in waves to assault entrenched Ukrainian troops.

@@dougstong5723 я правильно понимаю , что мясо из заключенных разбили в бахмуте элитную украинскую армию обученную экспертами из НАТО с поддержкой всего мира и лучшим оружием ? вы же понимаете , что такие утверждения больше унижают украинцев чем русских ))) Каждый раз когда вы говорите "русские воюют лопатами" задумайтесь почему они ебут вас даже лопатами и почему зеленский до сих пор не кататься на абрамсе по красной площади если у русских всё так плохо

To the last Ukrainian. According to Western hosts

Nice cope 🤣🤣🤣🤣 At least try to make your propaganda believable

@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 hear hear, its our believer of Ghost of Kyiv 🙄

@@majidb6266 Yeah he could be real but I don't know for a fact he's real (but I doubt it's a lie )

AT LEAST 4100 tanks. Shit, they were filling older cold war tanks with explosives and jihading them at UA forces. It's way more than 4100

Sure, a lie is still a lie no matter how many times one keeps repeating it, doesn't make it the truth, Ukraine has not even breach Russian defences, and down to only reserves whatever will they do.

Believing that they lost this number I can imagine you need a new news source.

Ukraine just added their lost tanks to Russia 😂

@@BoogsMcNoogs Probably, ~4100 taken out of action verified on Oryx..

That's the same thing the N@zi said about the US Sherman tank. Ironic isn't it.

@@inisipisTV Difference is that there is absolutely zero validity to the claim that the Sherman tossed it turret any more than any other tank. In fact, battlefield reports and first hand reports both show that the Sherman was (by a pretty wide margin) the safest tank to be in.

@@ImBigFloppaAnd not only was sherman safe, it was also the most reliable and versatile tank. You could do anything to the chassis like slap a bigger gun (105 mm variant) aid in mine warfare etc. It combined quality with quantity which the russians and germans both lacked. 50,000 produced sherman’s would win against 65,000 produced t34s.

@@ImBigFloppaof course it was safe when it was used mostly near the end of the war.

Actually most ammunition detonation occurs not in the corusel it occurs in the turret because there is ammo in the turret for the T-72 this is why alot of the times T-80 crews don't experience the exposive effect as much as in such this is a cope comment the AMX-10RC was destroyed and killed all crew from 1 artillery round that did not land on the vehicle only near it this is from a ukrainian battalion personal. The T-90M did fix this issue with having sperate compartment in the Turret. Because saying that the courosel will ignite alot is like saying any sherman will because its on the floor the ammunition its the best place to put it at with sacrafising crew comfort. Most chances that shrapnel get to the bottom of the tank is pretty low especially if its top attack aummunition that is programmed to his center mass on tanks anyway. It kills crew but any tank would suffer that fate. Seen as with leopards being striked with artillery.

Latest news, they are now.

@@inisipisTV I am most amused how Russia went from supposedly being able take Ukraine in days, to now being on the defensive. Bottom line is Russia has been embarrassed on the world stage by a much smaller and poorer country.

cope more

and your country will be vaporized few mins later

You know what the "U" in "Uralvagonzavod" is? Ural? You know where the Ural mountains are? Yeah, an ICBM will travel so far, going to end civilisation that way?

I thought the Russians were stupid and just produce crap, why would you enter ww3 to destroy a garbage factor Mr. NPC?

ah yes, and start ww3, very good idea. current Russia has been beyond tolerant of nato aggression so far, despite constant provocation by Urkaine. Even after the assassination attempt via drone, Russia has been beyond calm.

Do you really think that Russia didn't "decouple" since 2014 and even before?

and no canon fodder to use them. they will end in Syria lol

There are 500k drones waiting for them 😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪

Well, if you want them to be operated by children, okay NPC, because the west and the Ukrainian government it's been very serious about fighting to the last ukrainian.

Yeah right so many game changer western equipment fucked up by a rusty shovel

Una cosa es pedirlos y otra que te los entreguen a tiempo. Ucrania puede pedir todo lo que quiera pero no depende de ellos la capacidad de producción.

Эти танки построены для защиты

They are built for defense, unlike NATO tanks.

U are already out of javelin.

What happened to old targets in last few months? No new stories about great successes of counter offensive. We have same old song: Zelensky begging for more and more.

1. They won't tell you 2. Zero, which is why "nato" tanks are so superior, they're superior to zero, which in itself is true

Это ципсошники чубатые

should've seen the Russian nazis crying when they couldn't take kyiv in 3 days and how there "special military operation" turned from special to special ed

Satellites that rely on visual surveillance are only good strategically, not tactically.

@@definitelyfrank9341 You disregard the abilities of modern space spies.

@@feedyourmind6713 In the case of NATO satellites, only one or in rare cases, two satellites survey a certain spot a day. Unless you're monitoring a brigade, or the strength of the enemy's defense lines, they're useless in tactical situations.

@definitelyfrank9341 You just pointed to their tactical use... monitoring defensive lines. No armored fist can be built up along this front w/o satellites picking it up. Both sides know this, and are adapting to smaller unit offensives. While the smaller force might be a tactical change, it is, in this war, becoming a strategic change. We're not talking about NOAA satellites, which can't see license plates, but military ones which can have a resolution that can see troops in the open. Capella has its Capella 2 satellites (no, it's not military, but the govt can access it) have a resolution of 50cm X 50cm.