That’s it.

That's SUCH a good short summary of his shitty career 🤣

We have genes, hoser. We have 200 genes that are associated with intelligence, affect the brain, and which differ between I think it was Nigerians and Europeans. Too bad I can't show you images on here.

@@russianbotfarm3036 ???!! WTF

@@russianbotfarm3036 i have a higher iq than you, iq is a pretty meaningless metric

Full stop

See now this is a good comment.

Wrong. One group had about a 10 thousand year start to accomplish something, and accomplished squat. The statistics you are referring to are extremely recent and still the gap remains. And before you play dumb, there was so "free healthcare" during the dark ages. Still one group rose out of that to create the renaissance

@@XJ9sodypop Educate yourself and read "Guns, Germs and Steel" for a better understanding of why some societies advanced more than others. Dr. Murray even admits that 30% to 40% of IQ is based on environmental factors. This means just improving the standard of living, access to education resources, etc., could have a significant impact on a group's mean IQ in just 2 generations.

@@XJ9sodypop The fact you are trying to oversimply something that is in fact a complex set of casual relationships show that you are intellectually lazy and don't want to learn the science and history to better understand this.

@M F There are more genetic differences within races than between them

@M F it extremely isn’t, that’s why the Flynn effect exists. Even Murray himself had to admit IQ tests can be studied and prepared for (hilariously, when he was trying to justify the Flynn effect destroying the hereditary argument)

@@surenperera9288 ~ Both Flynn and Murray believed IQ is part hereditary, part environment. Btw it was Murray and his TBC co-author who who coined the phrase The Flynn Effect. You can watch Murray and the late Mr. Flynn debate on KZfaq.

@@leewhitaker538 Your point being?

@@franklinbadge1215 That is such a cliche thing to say, pity hardly anyone knows what it actually means except perhaps for some virtue signaling political scientists or experts that try to moderate a seemingly harsh stance on an issue. Even though technically true what in essence people mean when they say that is that any two random people within a race will have more difference between them than the average of two racial groups. Of course the greater the number of people you add to a gene pool the more that gene pool averages out and so two group averages by definition will not be so far apart. Next time some poorly educated fool or some virtue signaling "expert" repeats this ask them the following; what is the differences between two random individuals within a race compared to that of two random individuals from two different races? You guessed it, the difference will be quite large. You see people will have a lot more in common genetically with people in their own race than people that do not belong to their race. This is the simple reality, no politics no virtue signaling just the facts. of course it doesn't sound as nice to the ear especially if that ear belongs to a looney tunes lefty so people prefer the more PC way of looking at it.

@M F Where does the study even mention height?

Culture etched on our DNA more than previously known, research suggests BY SHANIKA GUNARATNA JANUARY 11, 2017 / 4:15 PM / CBS NEWS ---- “Common ancestry, common culture, common environment - all these factors contribute to the genomes of individuals of the same ethnic groups.”

And yet, guilty Ws like you rather deny facts.

@@emilyjones5830 Do you mean the "facts" found in the Bell Curve and his other ramblings? Sure I'll happily deny those "facts". I get you like your alternate "facts" but it doesn't negate it's BS and has been repeatedly debunked by far more intelligent people than me. You want to believe in it.... what could that make you? Maybe an R.

@@emilyjones5830 We deny it because it’s bullshit

@M F And, so? We all agree that people with down’s syndrome have suppressed IQ right? Yet we still provide them with more welfare and special education programs. If you believe black people are genetically morons then the solution is to provide them with more services, not less! All paid for by the rich and smart people, because if you're smart then you understand that a more prosperous and stable society is good for yourself as well as everyone else. That said individuals often have a IQ that vary radically from the norm, Percy Lavon Julian was probably smarter then you. I have a cousin that is pure Ashkenazi and is a moron. We have the technology (IQ testing) that can much more accurately determine a person intellectual potential from an early age then simply looking at their skin color or ancestry, so race as an intelligence marker is completely outmoded, like Phrenology.

@@rubisco5741 I think M F might be a bot that copies+pastes the same thing over and over. Also, you should look up Lasker's co-writers if you want a laugh at M F's "Sources"

yes

@@hostilepancake5081 guess I shouldn't have expected nothing less from a hater

Somehow it’s political to claim that systematic racist exists. Despite ridiculous amounts of evidence or proof, people will always want to maintain the status quo and keep their social hierarchy.

@@kento2771 exactly,sad but true

@@MrRap713 They're a hostile pancake dude they're just doing what they were made to do okay

~ They’d be flattered. 🦖 🦕

@@leewhitaker538 Doubt it...

@@leewhitaker538 They would be glad they got to be killed by an asteroid as an act of mercy so that they would never see that hideous hag

I was just thinking this 😂😂

~ His research will live on.

@@leewhitaker538 Research...ahem... You can know a lot about a person when they call BLATANT BS like what Murray did "research" :))

He's gonna have a surprise when he finds out Jesus is a brown guy.

Oh no, velociracists!

The dinosaurs would have bigger brains.

Culture etched on our DNA more than previously known, research suggests BY SHANIKA GUNARATNA JANUARY 11, 2017 / 4:15 PM / CBS NEWS ----- “Common ancestry, common culture, common environment - all these factors contribute to the genomes of individuals of the same ethnic groups.”

@@surenperera9288 But a smaller frontal cortex just like you.

Birds

Underrated comment

@M F WTF you talking about what has that got to do With being a Libertarian? And what science am I denying?

@M F Are you just copying and pasting in the comments section? Is there a reason why you want IQ to be linked to genetics so badly?

@J.C. Culture etched on our DNA more than previously known, research suggests BY SHANIKA GUNARATNA JANUARY 11, 2017 / 4:15 PM / CBS NEWS

Nature is racist. It doesn't care about our sensibilities. Tell me why Africa was so backwards when Europeans stumbled on it for the first time, ie, no colonialism. It wasn't Wakanda, whatever the movies tell you.

@@russianbotfarm3036 LMFAO 😂. Haaa racists and *secret* Neo Nazi’s are so ignorant of history 😂

@@russianbotfarm3036 LOL... why because they didn't have ships and gun powder and the means cause genocide. That seems legit.

If you think the Managers are Supervisors are far less intelligent, imagine how dumb they are at the top of the Corporate ladder? That thought makes me really depressed for the future of this planet.

@@BigDickMcFlick How true and definitely depressing.

I’m not certain that I agree with Shaun’s conclusions, but I have yet to finish watching his video. While there may be stuff to nitpick, the broader point stands that we are becoming a cognitively stratified society due to the way colleges sort us and the phenomenon of assortative mating (less marriage across class). Let’s forget about race differences for a moment. Do you think there’s a difference in average IQ between citizens of Massachusetts and citizens of Missouri? Probably! I’m willing to bet the Massachusetts citizens are smarter. And apparently, there’s a recent study about a Welsh mining village where they compared the genomes of the villagers who stayed behind in town to the genomes of the villagers who left for college and left the town, and there was a different genetic profile for the two groups. So yes, genes do play a role. If you read Blueprint by Robert Plomin, he talks about adoption studies and how the education level of the birth parents matter more than the education level of the adoptive parents when it comes to the child’s education level. Now, it may be the case that there’s no broad genome profile differences between whites and blacks on the macro level when it comes IQ, but SUBGROUPS may have there own genome profile when it comes to IQ.

@@RLSteve even if what you say is true about the genomes of those villagers it implies that environment changes the genomes and it has nothing to do with race. Citizens in different places within the US regardless of race demonstrates quality of education and culture not race. Your point is still flawed.

@@silentj624 No, the study implies that the genes influence whether the villagers leave the village or stay behind. Genes often select their environment.

@@RLSteve I need that study. Not buying it. That still doesn't say how things were while they were still there. Were they the smarter people in the group? Plenty of smart people don't go to college. Lots of dumb folks do. And you didn't address what I said about location, culture, and quality of education. More educated people tend to be smarter. People with huger quality education tend to be smarter

@@silentj624 Yes, but colleges also pick smarter people to educate, that’s what you’re overlooking. There’s a difference between a community college educated person and an Ivy League educated person. It’s not the substance of the education, but their cognitive ability and work ethic.

What metric would you suggest using if not IQ? I thought it was a universal intelligence metric but I haven’t studied IQ nor had a IQ test

@@ericp4256 honestly, who says we need one? It's not like colleges ask what your iq is when you apply? And prospective employers usually don't ask either.

@@ericp4256 there isnt a Universal Metric. That's the problem. Intelligence is such a broad category. It's like saying "let's determine strength through a test and do this via lifting weights". Okay well you just excluded runners primarily and you excluded other metrics we could use to depict strength.

@@rishabhanand4973 right... iQ doesn’t limit anyone. It’s a study of intelligence that isn’t used for hiring..

@@mattmiller9809 IQ is used because it is the closest thing to universal. The military uses it. Other countries use it..

Noone said 'only'.

Gottem!! Lmao, underrated joke comrade.

it's science with data, not theories

~ His research will live on though.

@@center8922 WAAAA! Why did you say that name!?!

@@center8922 I was exaggerating, but not really joking. I definitely miss Michael Brooks and feel sad whenever his name comes up.

Agree. I've taken a couple basic IQ tests and I seen absolutely nothing that even came close to being cultural in nature. I suspect they are thinking about college placement tests and stuff like that. I think those have been shown to be culturally biased... at least way back. Not sure about now. Btw, EVEN IF these were culturally biased, the testing was being done on those in the same career field. Thus, I would think that a ton of these individuals would have similar backgrounds for at least the past 5 to 10 years.

Yeah a significant percentage of the questions are literally just patterns in a box

I would have liked him to have been able to elaborate on his statement.

IQ tests were designed to track academic progress of young children in school. They are designed to test if someone is managing to keep up with the curriculum. As a measure of innate "intelligence" they are very useless, since there a myriad of environmental factors that play into your success with the test. Hunger is a negative factor, while wealth is a positive factor. By preparing for the test you can increase your IQ score. The reason they correlate with success in many fields is probably that they correlate with education and success therein.

@P4ouR 4 you don't get many patterns in a box questions when you live in a mansion either. What's your point?

Making sense of the data is a lot easier, or at least cognitively consistent, than making nonsense of the data. Which camp are you in?

@UC4FXJg0fVUiiSXm4tVIYTlA Dude... Have you ever read his stupid book? There's a reason why Charles Murray is considered to be a racist. Sorry to burst your bubble, my boy, but buckle up! This will be ugly, just like Charles Murray's shiny bald head. The bell curve is based on a study done by a dutch scientist who deliberately excluded Africans with high IQs and simultaneously used a small sample size which is not represenative when it comes to empirical data. The metrics that were used to test the Africans were also different which makes accurate comparisons between the Western results and the African results impossible. Murray goes on to justify the wealth gap between black and white people and uses genetic differences as the main reason when in fact slavery and the effects of the racist policies that were abolished in the 60s are the main cause because poverty statistically trickles down 4 generations. A little eye opener for you: In some counties of the US racist laws existed til the 90s. This moron Murray even suggests that systematic changes would be appropriate for black people. His book is a wild read. If you like this cuck I'm pretty sure this is eye opening. If this doesn't change your opinion after either fact checking my stuff or actually reading his toilet paper book, you're a piece of filth.

@@vampirgirl41 This Murray guy may well be racist. However this clip he merely states the fact the there is an IQ difference, he didn't say the relationship was causal, he said there's correlation. In your reply you even said it yourself "when in fact slavery and poverty are the main reasons" Here you are yourself agreeing with Murray in this clip. In this clip Murray never said the cause or why, he simply said there's a difference. And based on your response you clearly agree with him because you tried to list reasons why there's a difference

Mental gymnastics? Basic observation does more than enough

@@vampirgirl41 What would you say to other studies (not by Murray or those he cites) that consistently show a difference between the IQs of white Americans and black Americans?

Little peepees

Simple, Killer. It's the only thing they got going for them.

Its sad they think pseudoscience like phrenology is real. Or don't seem to realize economic situations play a huge role in education.

Why is IQ racist?

Because they know their relative status in society is largely unearned, and they don't want to fall to the bottom of the brutal hierarchy they continue to uphold.

@M F Hmm. You seem to think making descriptive statements alters reality. I'll fix it for you. "He is 'affirming racist pseudoscience, based on centuries of white-supremacist propaganda, designed to justify imperialism, slavery, and genocide." You're doing the same.

@@yishnir You literally just have to go visit any black community or have any interactions with them to see it is reality. Africa is the way it is for a reason my man. You are so far out from reality you refuse to use your own eye's and ears to make sense of the world around you.

@@trolllollol5327 poor guy wants to feel superior based on his lack of individual accomplishments in life

@@jaylencash7049 It's funny that in his own response he is degrading murray's work and life. Without double standards liberals would have no standards at all. Guarantee like many of us he grew up in a majority white suburb of a major city and he literally thinks the token blacks that were at his school are representative of the black community at large.

@@trolllollol5327 Wow. The subtle 'scientific racism' just cartwheeled into open white supremacy. It's lucky for you that you were born as part of the 'master race'... it makes it easy to tell people you're 'of superior stock' without having to actually do anything. Africa is indeed 'the way it is' for 'reasons'... most of which have to do with imperialism, pillaging and conquest by European countries, and then two centuries of global financial oppression paired with richer nations (e.g., America) using Africa for a military playground and farmland for the 'illegal' drug trade. You may have missed it, in your 'close observation of reality' but the U.S. has been toppling democratically elected governments and assassinating leaders in Africa, South America, the Middle East, and elsewhere for what, 70 years or more? It's impressive that you expect poor countries to somehow improve themselves when the full force of the U.S.'s espionage and covert war divisions have been sparing no expense just to make sure that doesn't happen.

Still, I feel bad about the jackasses that think they're part of some master race, as opposed to realizing that the very language is put together to keep them from seeing that they're just new slaves. Just because the chains aren't literal does not mean they don't exist.

White pale skin before the advent of synthetic vitamin D allowed white humans to excel in foggy and dreary regions. The white skin requires less UV exposure to produce melatonin. There are dozens of genetic advantages each type of people from all over the world display. Some argue left handed people are rare compared to right handed people because ancient combat with shield of some sort and spear or club has a much higher chance of piercing the heart or the artery that runs down the left shoulder and part of the left arm. Later in formation left handed people had to use their right hand to fit the formation increasing the left handed soldier's chances of being cut or punctured do to lack of dexterity. Un proven hypothesis but could be true. No one can prove it yet but as more ancient bones are discovered there may be an answer to question of why there are so many more right handed people than left handed people. Heredity, environment, and chance are the key factors that decide ones place in ancient times. The echos of those three defining factors are still audible today.

@@sndspderbytes I've heard the melatonin thing before but that comes with an obvious and pretty serious down side. Namely skin cancer, where as to my knowledge with some Nepalese and their ability to breath in lower oxygenation environments I haven't yet heard of a genetic disadvantage associated with the trait yet. Although I'm sure there is one since most advantages come with a disadvantage in another area. We just don't what it is yet. The key factor here the bigots seem to miss is that these minor differences between ethnicities are not large enough to make a Nepalese person a new species which means they really aren't all that different. There's a list of 20 or so people who've climbed Everest without supplemental Oxygen and not all Nepalese people could do that even if they wanted to. So their "advantage" or difference is not that great and certainly not large enough to make them a different species. Just as my pasty ass may be able to get by in Washington better than a black person but not at a rate that really makes much of a difference. When I was a kid going to school in Washington a bunch of the white people I went to school with used to be prescribed tanning bed therapy. The lack of sunlight in WA causes some people to get depressed. So while white people make be able to make more vitamin D that wouldn't matter much if you're depressed enough to commit suicide due to depression from not seeing the sun and therefor can't pass on your genes. There really is no such thing genetic advantage.

@@sndspderbytes these are not intelligence, though...

@@djluminol there are genetic advantages... however, humans have altered their planet so much and so swiftly that none of it matters in any truly useful way anymore.

And several steps further than tucker!

I've tried searching for the source of that quote, but found nothing... yet.

@@venusboys3 I did a cursory search earlier but didn't really find anything but this from an interview with the hosts of _Chapo Trap House_ : *Matthew J. Watson:* How do you see Harvard and institutions like it as implicated in neoliberalism? *Matt Christman:* I mean, the entire Ivy League exists as a perpetuator of privilege, obviously, but also as a perpetuator of the fantasy of meritocracy, which is what justifies the privilege. All of these kids who are so brilliant just happened to be children of people who are in a similar social situation, but they went to Harvard - like Jared Kushner, for example! He’s not just some dickhead son, he’s a dickhead son who went to Harvard. For three million dollars. It’s basically laundering privilege.

@@AisuruMirai Oh, OK... so maybe Matt is just paraphrasing? His paraphrase is pithier (is 'pithier' a word?)

@@venusboys3 This probably is not the source for his statement. The following is a comment made by a 23-year-old comic artist/illustrator in 2012 on the website of another comic artist. The way she just casually mentions it in the midst of a discussion about titillating women in comic books makes it seem as if the concept of education as laundered privilege has been an obvious fact to some for a long time and not the new and mind-blowing revelation I thought it was. "I never said these guys were maliciously oppressing people in their work, I get that it’s ignorance and freshly-laundered privilege showing. But so what? I’m not sure why you had to take the time to remind me that these guys are so entrenched in their male-gaze white guy culture it’s practically the air they breath[e]."

@@AisuruMirai hmmm... well... maybe its origin will turn up, eventually.

So, this is the first time you've seen him. And after a loaded intro by the private boarding school-educated house-by-the-country-club host and a minute-long clip followed by 16 minutes of pontificating by people who've probably never held a real job in their lives, you've got him all figured out

His main is claim id that we should create an universal basic income to fix the "injustice" of the biologic lottery on IQ, but they portray him as a monster.

False.

That's hilarious

@@johnnytwotimes7854 I’m sure I’m not the only one it happens to.

@@vladtheimpalerofyourmom-ag5112 You think miracles happen to a lot of people? Edit-(Realized you didn't exactly say it happens to a lot of ppl, but I was too excited to make this joke lol)

@@johnnytwotimes7854 no but poorly and irresponsibly administered IQ tests do. Would have definitely made more sense to give me the test not while the other kids were out enjoying themselves for example.

@@vladtheimpalerofyourmom-ag5112 Yeah of course haha, using one iq test as a pure measure of intelligence is ridiculous even not under those circumstances. I was just making a joke about how the school thought it was a miracle.

@M F I am a USAF veteran. 15 years serving with every race America had to offer. We were all equally dumb enough to join. Take your supremacy philosophy elsewhere. Anyone that believes that mess is a lost soul...I pray for you...

@@kenwaynewalker28 Don't mind M F. He found a study he hasn't read and doesn't understand, and he wants to make sure everyone knows about it too.

Which automatically makes it flawed. It's focusing on one aspect of intelligence and treating it as an objective number

@@j0j0dartiste21 what? It focuses just on patern recognition. Do you know what patern recognition is?

@@jeffseid6157 paranoics see patterns everywhere

@@birdworldist IQ test question involves a patern and to find the answer involves the less amount of patterns available. for a given question each answer choice requires a certain amount of patterns, one must pick the answer that requires least amount of patterns.

thats the raben matrix test , IQ test also have another type of test i dont remeber the name and there is a lot of questions that have to be evaluated to discharge possible cultural biases.

This comment section has somehow gotten even more toxic than they get when they cover Dimmy Jore, so as they like to say I guess we're right over the target. It is also summer though, so all the libertarians are back from high school.

Here comes the survivalist/homesteader.

Sounds like you're coping to me.

IQ tests aren't mere measures of how well one can do the tests. If they were, they wouldn't predict school grades and a wide number of real-life outcomes - which they do.

@@djangountamed9544 exactly!

Lmfao

Education benefits individuals and societies; education can make you free and inoculate you against hate based rhetoric. Authoritarians think "work will make you free" -- this modern day sequel to 1933 needs shut down.

@P4ouR 4 You can tell they are clearly using it as a scapegoat for the way minority groups are treated. Because they still don't want to do really anything about it. They claim there's no racism because people have "low IQ", but also don't want to do really anything to better our education system. That's a big example of how full of it a lot of their arguments are. They never really have any viable solutions besides just telling individuals to "do better" in the midst simplest terms.

@@Anthropomorphic That's always the thing that gets me about these folks. They try to snake around facts of racism and other socio-economic things to come up with their imagined problems. But their solution to almost all these problems they create is just either directly blaming a minority group or just saying individual citizens just need to "do better". If they believe people have inherent problems, their solution is to still blame the individual for their inherent problems. It's almost like double rascism, because they already believe black people have "low IQ", and also don't want to do anything to help people they already think are less than them.

Nobody finds this as a reason to mistreat anyone. This is the reason one group can not compete with another at a level playing field, the same reason there is affirmative action. They will forever be stuck in the lower caste due to genetics and no amount of wokeness will fix that. At some point you must realize the only solution is to just go our separate ways and everyone will be better off because we will never have to disagree again.

@@twodogs5395 So "they should be stuck in a lower caste" pretty much is just a justification for mistreating people. You pretty much are saying the country has the right to neglect "low IQ" people just because. There's not supposed to be a "caste system" in America, this is supposed to be the land of the free where everyone can make it. But now y'all claim there's certain people who just won't make it, but y'all don't wanna do anything for those people. That's the problem, if y'all think "low IQ" is a thing, and y'all only solution is something like ethnostates. Instead of making systemic changes that benefit everyone, y'all rather blame entire groups for something even y'all think is "genetic". Affirmative action isn't just for black people, you know that right? You talking about "being competitive" all I'm talking about is people having food and shelter without needing to compete for basic necessities. We overproduce almost everything, so the idea that " there's not enough" isn't really that valid.

His wife is Thai. His kids are half Thai. Have you ever been outside of the USA? And spring break in Cancun doesn't count

@@joffreykatzenbuger5796 What about Bahamas and Vancouver?

@@andrewthen8998 Prove he's "anti-black"

@@coldwynn LOL no one goes to Bahamas and Vancouver for Spring Break

@@joffreykatzenbuger5796 ~ His first wife was Thai.

@Tyler H ahem, good sir. Surely you mean -50%?

Really? The only thing that blows my mind are 'shrooms.

I firmily disagree with Goulds methodology and his implications. I have spent the past 7 years researching IQ and its consequences professionally. Feel free to ask me any questions.

How can a book from 1980 specifically dismantle a book from 1994? The only thing that's dismantled here is your brain.

@@ezra5485 that's just how outdated Murray's nonsense is. If I wrote a book about how gravity is fake, Newton's writings would still demolish it even though they came out centuries before

@@ezra5485 Perhaps your IQ isn't high enough to understand that Gould's demolition of IQ destroys the basis of Murray's argument.

@@anthonybarcellos2206 It didn't.

@M F Citation needed

@M F strange that they can't find the gene for IQ but they can find it for height.

@@Redactedlllllllllllll There isn't a single gene for IQ or height. Both are polygenic and subject to environmental influences.

@@synchronium24 was I wrong on that? Thanks for the correction.

@M F not at all.

I don't but if this stuff interests you then you should check out the book "The Tyranny of Merit" by Michael Sandel.

@@silkbutter Read it... Loved it! Absolutely recommend it as well... Thank you.

@@jamesclark6142 a low iq loser loved a book that ''debunks" merit, surprise, surprise!

@@HIMYMTR Damn! You are amazing! 6 sentences is all it took for you to see right through me... Thanks for the insight, I'll try to be better.

@@HIMYMTRit doesn’t “debunk” merit at all it just asks a lot of deep and profound philosophical questions about the impact that merit has on our society.

Questioning assumptions should not be scary. It should be habitual.

It's scary that questions are scary to you lot. How fragile is your worldview?

@@dukedematteo1995 jeez, you again, you must have really hated him.

There was probably a study. Not a hiring thing.

It takes a considerable amount of intelligence to be a good nurse since medical science has become very technical.

@Allen T clearly you don't understand the remit of a nurse.

@Allen T If you think an ability to recognise reactions to medications are closer to what IQ tests concentrate on than quadratic equations, i think we know how your IQ test came out. Quadratic equations, with the right formula, are pure logic.

@Allen T i mean the flaw in your logic is glaring right now.

@Allen T you realise they don't have a picture of a man with a green face and a needle in his arm either, right?

@Allen T I am feeling pretty confident so if you like you can pick an IQ test of your choice and i'll destroy you at it?

Their mom’s basement

Liberal Korean American woman here & everything Charles Murray said aligns w/E. Asia's (China, Japan, Korea) world view. There's nothing weird about it, just common sense stuff.

@@white_isnt_a_race2338 found one ☝️

​@@white_isnt_a_race2338 white people are a race deal with it😂

You could tell he's pissed. I don't blame him.

@M F Quiz time. In the Panizzon twin study you love to quote, Vocabulary has the highest heredity of all the tests performed (93%). Why is a person's vocabulary so hereditary? I don't think I have ever learned a word from my genetics. Have you?

@@cf3714 Verbal reasoning.

Who?

Fox brands itself as " news _entertainment_ " as a work-around.

wow dude is literally platforming a scientist!! How dare he!! *now let's get back to out pee tape bombshell!*

@M F Intelligence _range_ might be genetic, but to _maximize_ that range, nurture is necessary. And if it's one thing the black community in the United States have _not_ had, it's a "nurturing, supportive" environment. In fact, our lives are quite injected with fear, which turns _off_ the pre-frontal cortex, making it very difficult to learn. And remember: "education" is not the same thing as "intelligence."

@@ficialintelligence1869 ~ Create your own nurturing communities.

@@leewhitaker538 White supremacists do their best to tear them down, burn them down, disenfrachise them, and illegalize them. (When's the last time you heard of a white _non-Jewish_ church being vandalized or burnt down?) The homeschooling program that these groups of people are instituting is doing _exactly_ what you are saying. I'm biding my time until the white supremacist/white nationalist/white evangelical infrastructure realize what's happening when well-adjusted, competent brown students are admitted to colleges and universities in a wave. It'll take 5 to 8 years. I'm curious to see the "regulations" that will inevitably be instituted in order to hobble this community, as it is something that the white nationalist and white evangelical communities themselves created in the 1960s - 1980s during white flight.

He would say that you’re on the higher end and you’re a credit to your race

There have been many, many studies over the years, and funny enough no respectable scholars come to the conclusion that there's any difference in actual intelligence between races of people.

@@WillowTDog no respectable scholars? Respected by who? They're still scholars. Lol

@@WillowTDog many many studies? What studies you referring to?

@Gage Acosta you're free to sneed.

@@WillowTDog How about James Watson, nobel prize winner and discoverer of DNA?

The picture of Murray. The racist's best friend.

Because conservatives are racists.

Because Murray's "magnum opus" is very popular in reactionary circles.

Oy vey, shut it down.

i would encourage you to read murray's new book. it's a very short book - you could read it in a day or two, probably - and judge for yourself. the facts are pretty stark.

Because it’s sealed inside a closed environment; your skull. Most of the outward facing evolutionary traits that differentiate the races adapted to deal with external conditions.

Nobody is saying the brain is exempt. Why would you think the brain is exempt from all the other things that make your body healthy, like proper nutrition and exercise? The smartest person in the world right now is probably some 6 year old girl in poverty in Bangladesh. But we will never know because her circumstances will never allow that potential to come to fruition

@@dukedematteo1995 But what genes are passed on and what genes are present is completely environmentally based.

First of all, just say you think Black people are an inferior race bud. Quit tap dancing around that. Second of all, what was “selected” in white people besides a high latitude in Europe, exactly?

I think most people acknowledge that the human brain *could* have evolved differently in different places in theory. They just aren't convinced that that's the path evolution actually went down.

Do you do the Tom Cruz bottle tricks? I forgot the movie.

@@coldwynn lol Tom Cruz. Is that Ted's brother? I think you mean Tom Cruise. And the movie was Cocktail. 😋

@@SoSoMikaela Lol, you're right! But you never answered the question. You're not going to divulge your secrets?

Once your brain develops fully you cannot increase your IQ If you knew anything about the subject youd know they been studying this subject for over a century and accounted for every contingency

@@SoSoMikaela btw its cruise

You're one of Sam's lovers? "Admitted" as in the bedroom?

Was that before or after Erza Klein took Sam Harris to the cleaners?

@@nickadt I don't like Sam Harris and think he's stupid especially on this point. Its just inaccurate to day him and Murray are friends or even associates

@@dukedematteo1995 could be I remembered it wrong, I remember him being kind of passive then claiming he disagreed in another episode. In any case he's certainly not BFFs with Murray. Either way not something I care much about as I'm not an ardent follower of Sam, Murray, or MR

Not even close, Murray simply picked up on the old eugenics shtick that dates back to the early 20th Century.

@@tomterific390 I mean if we're going that far then I guess Galton is the OG scientific racist.

@@ShubhamBhushanCC Galton would definitely be one of Murray's "Papas."

Is that how they describe Harvard and MIT these days?

@@joffreykatzenbuger5796 Aaaaw, did mention of higher education trigger you, Jethro?

@@esqueejy No, those are the schools the professor attended and was awarded degrees from

yup! Social justice degree told me this dude is wrong!

@@joffreykatzenbuger5796 So what if he did? Every University in the country was producing proud white racists when KKKlanner Murray attended Harvard etc.

They're both pieces of shit but Douglas Murray is slightly better

And 'The Alt Hype' on bitchute has a point-by-point refutation in 4 parts. Go to his channel, and look for 'shaun'. Just watch the last one, he sums things up there.

@@russianbotfarm3036 Yeah, I just scanned part 1. Whoever this guy is, he is incredibly whiny. He complains that Shaun isn't highlighting the more "positive" parts of the book. Which is silly because he made a critique of the book. He doesn't have to! He also nitpicks the most minor things and whines about them several times in the same video. This dude also posts videos about how what happened to the Native Americans can't really be considered genocide, etc. He's a right-wing nutjob and should be shamed into oblivion. Shaun's points still stands. The Bell Curve is built on poorly gathered statistics. And its suggested actions on the flawed conclusions are monstrous. It dehumanizes the poor and minorities.

@@russianbotfarm3036 Bro, why are you using bitchchute as a source?

@@whyamimrpink78 Excuse me while I appeal to authority.

@@keiffernewman3025 Murray is a scientific expert who has proven race contributes to IQ because I said so.

Because those variables re immaterial - most of IQ is inherited to be realized. A genius can be raised in a ditch and still have intelligence beyond other groups. Low IQ Sam Seder doesn't grasp this.

Supposedly they tried to compare between similar income levels and family situations. I say supposedly because I haven't read the book, I only read about it. I don't hold any position other than I think features of the brain would be heritable just like any other physical features, and some brains appear to work better than others.

@@NoahBodze have you been tested on your IQ? One big part that it tests is knowledge, which people of lower income levels are obviously not going to have as much of because of poor school quality

Joshua Pinch. He never said the difference was due to genetics, he correctly identified the correlation.

The type of tests are logical reasoning involving shapes. And finding the odd one out. Or pattern finding. I think a big proof of whites and asians being smarter is the gaming community where it actually requires high level mental process , clearly it is dominated by asians and whites. The games are usually free or cheap, everybody starts from a level playing field and and yet blacks are not getting the top spots.

They love him as long as the check clears

They are the exceptions. They're the good ones.

@@arontotheleft Self-hating liars.

@@bongodave13 WHy self-hating? Whites aren't the smartest, either - Jews and north east Asians are (Koreans, Japanese). I'm white - not the smartest - but I don't hate myself.

@@arontotheleft No. They're the exceptions because THEY believe he's not talking about them.

Smh

Don't worry. Obama will save you.

@@center8922 I know you are trying to troll me here, but I am not sure I understand what you are saying. At least do me the curtesy of explaining to me how you are owning this lib.

lol Let's assume that's true; so what? What does it tell you? What is the value of the information?

@@coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13 What do you mean? It explains this part of the racial disparities.

The Africans tested in The Bell Curve weren't even given the test in their language, part of the normalization across groups was that the test was administered in French. Flawed studies all over the place

Yep, I once did multiple IQ tests and the more I did the better my score was. I have a hard time believing my genes mutated making me a super genius, lol.

They explained why IQ is bullshit, and anyway, they don’t have to come up with a brand new criticism any time that someone mentions why “The Bell Curve” is deeply flawed, thoroughly refuted, racist pseudoscience.

Oh god lmao