“We can’t call everyone racists!” “What about people who say and do racist things?” “WELL NOW let’s not get crazy”

This didn't age well for the caller

Confused caller: "You called a racist person racist, therefore you call everyone racist." This is the level of intelligence that's becoming the standard, ladies and gentlemen. And saying Sarah Palin looks like a slutty flight attendant means you just called all flight attendants slutty, because people who don't know how sentences work don't understand the idea of a modifier. I despair for the species.

2 years later, Bernie Sanders is the "fantasy candidate" the caller dismissed the possibility of existing :^)

"You call people racists and that isn't fair." "I don't." "But if you did, it wouldn't be fair." "Umm... OK." "Then you agree with me." "No I don't." "But if you did..."

This is the problem with the anti-SJW movement. Everything you disagree with them on, automatically becomes you calling them a racist or a bigot. They've become the thing they hate.

Wow, this guy went to the Dinesh D'Souza school of debate. So many straw men, so few brains.

"Confused Caller." Sums up this guy perfectly.

We SHOULD always call out racism when we see it. It's not shutting down any argument it's just identifying malicious truths.

To say "calling my policies and ideas racist is shutting down debate" is to say that you can't actually defend your policies and ideas.

Listening to Sam is so enlightening.

He thinks a bill has "bipartisan support" that literally zero members of one party voted for. He is working on a level beyond me.

Methinks the man doth protest too much. The caller is a racist. You can tell by how desperate he is to sweep racism under the rug.

Participating in the debate = shutting down the debate? Huh...never knew that.

“But we have all these huge government programs...” Yeah 56% of the federal budget goes to defense contractors while less than 1% goes to non-medical welfare benefits. It’s out of control! I’m

Sorry Greg but we have a right and a duty to call out racists wherever they are. Never ignore or allow it. That's no way to stop racism. That's what the Germans did and that's how the Holocaust happened in Germany. If you're not for good you are for evil. There are some things worth fighting for. Not many perhaps. But love, understanding, intelligence, respect, compassion, dignity, helping our fellow humans, respecting and caring for our planet...these are things that benefit all humans and must be upheld. Good over evil. It's really not rocket science. It does help if we learn to read and use our brains instead of listening to these stupid con men tell us what to think without any basis in facts and/or reality. That way lies madness and evil.

"The Caller" - "We have biggest disparity in income, and income equality is way down" That is cause of trickle down economy and crony capitalism practised by successive governments since Regan era and his trickle down economics philosophy that still prevails among the conservatives and right wing politicians in US today!!! It is a trickle down economics that is to blame, calls for fairer society and social security state is only way to prevent the income disparity. As things are, US needs to look at European economise that have given rise to fairer societies, more equality and lower social and health costs on the state but also the taxpayers who contribute less in tax but also get more from their state. Corruption that is out of control in US today is main reason why social and economic inequality is at all time high with very few owning more than 65% of entire wealth of the United States, and when I say very few I am referring to only top 600 families in US today. Its a true representation of a feudalist state when so few control so much.

I still don't quite understand the caller's point about Social Security. He seems to be arguing "you shouldn't be promoting people like Elizabeth Warren who want to expand SS, you shouldn't be promoting Progressive candidates who challenge the Feinsteins and Schumers of the world by running on expanding SS, and you shouldn't be promoting Hillary, because she is Pete Peterson's candidate who wants to cut SS." So who is Sam or anyone on the Left supposed to support? For that matter, since there is "no difference between Obama and Romney on this issue," who is ANYONE supposed to support if they don't agree with cutting Social Security? On his point about the Left calling people "racist" too casually, there is somewhat of a point there, since a lot of people do seem to conflate any issue, including legitimate ones involving troubling demographic trends, with racism, and that is sometimes meant to quell rather than to foster debate. However, since Conservatism is so virulent with legitimate racism, anyone looking at today's politics sanely has to acknowledge this, and that more often than not, including in the example brought up (Ryan's quoting of Charles Murray to decry inner city laziness), the Liberals calling these statements racist have a point.

Well, he DID make a racist argument. "Black culture does not cause poverty." - "Yes, but we should stop calling everyone a racist at the first step. There's so much income disparity *despite the huge government programs*." That argument implies that environmental factors cannot be blamed, and that thus the cause of disparity must be genetic in nature. That IS what he said. He suggested that race itself was a factor, not merely linked to other factors. That is the very definition of racism.

This guys sees people "seeing racism where it doesn't exists" where is doesn't exist.

Many of these conservatives know that they are racist and don't care what other people think about it. But they don't want to be called racist.

Calling others out for their stupidity is not violating their freedom of speech.

He did seem rather confused.

Disregarding whatever your ideology is, do your homework for goodness sake. Whomever your calling to debate have facts, figures, and stick to the point. This man started off talking about purported racism on a MR video. Without having anything to cite or a real point, once again the call spirals out of control. Well ummm.. well I disagree with you on this point now! But that isn't why you called in the first place.

Welfare and government assistance are the cause of wealth inequality? Bro what 🤡

I needed to get my gps out to figure out where he was going with this . Great job Sam for schooling the wannabe schooler lol

I didn't get his point. I think he was conflating too much.

Fuck I love it when Americans get angry. For some reason it always puts a smile on my face. They just go for the jugular and don't relent, then when it's over it's like "okay, well I hope the kids are well and I'll see you next week, take care now!". It's the funniest shit to watch! :-)

The funniest thing about these is that none of the libertarians can listen for more than 30 seconds to an opposing argument. They genuinely think they’re gonna come on and just steamroll people with 20 second bursts of talking points lol and can not handle it when an issue gets dragged out more than just surface level

this guy did kind of predict Warren, though.

You are the same as X, therefore my argument of Y always holds up. Dig deeper bro.

That was confusing even for me!!! my brain just went numb!

This man really said he listens to Sam Seder for the same reasons he listens to Limbuagh wtf

What is wrong with the word liberal. I agree with majority report on almost everything I have seen so far. I call myself a liberal or the be clearer a left-liberal. Why is this a bad word.

Bring this libertarian forth now, deep into 2020, and observe the reaction.

these guys might have more credibility of they could stick to one topic, and debate it proficiently....

Did he not also notice how the host on liberal HuffPo tore Suzy Park apart and called her opinions stupid?

These callers refuse to listen to what anybody has to say. Totally insular people.

Damn I miss Michael. See you in the fun half brother

Why do all these nutjobs have lousy phone connections? Did they string up their own phone lines and build their own phones (out of tin cans)? A large majority open every harangue with "I have a lousy connection. I can't hear you too well."

What’s up with all the “bad connections”?!?!

I’m taking a walk down memory lane with libertarians on mr. Again. Remember when talk show hosts (I remember Keith Oberman doing it) used to insist their guests call in on a land line? That should be a permanent rule for libertarians. Their phones are so terrible.

If you're talking to someone and they say racist things and you call that out and their response is tell you it's not ok to bring that up because it's a blanket insult then they're not accidentally racist they're purposefully racist and they're cornered.

We have massive amounts of wealth inequality and poverty because of unregulated enterprise. It's not because of government action, it's the lack of government action.

What a deeply confused caller.

"Its my opinion" "I disagree with that" can these guys have any position that can be defended or argued in any way?? likely not. evidence is constructed, narratives are bias, the true 'postmodern' "we're all right in our own way so leave me alone as I hurt people".

I can't fault that man that's the level of comparetence I have in arguments

This aged beautifully

The caller lost the debate.

We cannot know what another person (black if we're white) (female if you're male) feels and I hate it when anyone is so arrogant they tell me how I feel what I think etc. Why not ask me? I 'll tell you what I think how I feel or my experience. But you need to listen to me and believe me. Then I'll listen to you. See how that works?

man.... mr Seder nailed this guy on all of the topics he started to fling around... Mr Seder clearly understands every part of the debate and i am not sure the so called "Educator" can possibly be taught the difference of fact from fiction or keep his topics straight well done Mr Seder

His comments about Warren really aged badly.

"social security expansion will never happen, do you think dianne feinstein will let that pass?" LMAO HOW IS HE NOT BEING IRONIC

6:28 oh man why you gotta drag Luda into this

He clearly won in the Marketplace of Ideas

That was funny! Though I wish the crew would have said, "you just said Paul was 'appealing to a certain base' with his dog whistle, presumably to get himself re-elected by that base, but dems shouldn't 'appeal to a certain base' with expansion of social security themselves to do the same? What's the difference?" I loved this one, though. Hilarious!

Why does he look like a skinner versionof Steven Coward but with glasses

So he agrees that the comment was rascist and dosen't agree with people who are being racist,but he dosent want them to be called racist but he kinda agrees with the racist thought but no one should say its racist?

Sam debates a drunk toddler

Thanks!

I couldn't follow his logic

Wow, guy just trots our all the classic right wing arguments. Prime example of cognitive dissonance right there.

Yes, he's all over the place. He has no idea what he's trying to say

That's the problem playing chess with pigeons. They don't understand the rules, they knock the pieces over and shit on the board, and fly back to their flock and claim victory.

This is John in DaaHallas

I won't say anything if you won't.

I like the fact Sam forces himself to slow his speech

Anyone who calls Seder gets the best of him duh!

Actually, I think we can call everyone racist. I don't think anyone raised in the US can be not racist. I think the best we can to catch ourselves when we think something racist. For people who disagree, I remember hearing about Jessie Jackson saying he was ashamed of himself when he was walking down a street at night and was afraid when saw someone coming toward him until he realized the person is white.

John like all conservatives hate being called out for their racism...one thing you cannot credit cons for is having thick skin...

Thank GOD that hate monger rush Limbaugh has passed on to who knows where.

I miss Michael.

I hate these pessimists. If we thought his way we'd never have flown to the moon! It's so sad.

Why do libertarians always have such a bad connection

Please tone the high frequencies down a bit. Thank you.

The only politician that promises ponies is Vermin Supreme, and he's Da Bomb.

John front Texas 😔

The caller is correct in that the Dems will not advocate for SS.

Libertarianism is not intrinsically racist, however, it is extremely ill equiped to handle or combat problems like racism by design. Meaning if you see race as an important political issue, you will have strong opinions of libertarians.

Project much caller?

You go girl!! ❤

Own this fool Sam

I love this show!

A racist right winger has learned to articulate his racism with bigly words; he desperately wants to be racist -- Sarah Palin speak

The caller is a racist trying defend racism

I so get a kick out of watching these liberals try to sway (or school) Sam. It is so entertaining to watch.

Lololol that's Racist !!!! Lol

To say people are worse off now than they were in the 70s is just ignorant. The economy is better now than it has ever been after the 50s.

Sam always uses the argument against a free market, "It never happened, therefore it can't exist."

Trickle-down economics doesn't work? Of course it works. It depends on what the social/economic goals are. It works for millionaires and billionaires, but hurts everyone else. If it didn't work for them, it would have gone away after being discredited as a con over 40 years ago. That's the goal. So yes, it works.

3:37 I'm not buying it Sam, just throwing your hands in the air and say, "i'm not part of that." Anyone with some common sense can see the mob mentality of stifling debate on the issue of race if it's not placating to the race baiters.

Why does Sam Seder hate America?