There are 2 ways to think of TVs... 1. What looks "Good" to your eye, or 2. What is true to "real" color and light. I am a Colorist in the Film industry in Los Angeles. I'm in the process of deciding between the Sony A1e and the Samsung QLED models from 2017. BLACKS: OLED "Looks" Stunning because it can turn power off from pixels and create an image that is totally black where it needs to (No power to the Pixel). While this make the picture seem more rich, it isn't all that realistic. When looking at the real world through our eyes, there will always be light bouncing off of an object, even in the dark. If you walk around in the woods on a moonless night, you will still make out shapes and movement because most surfaces are still reflecting photons back at your eye. OLED may look more "rich" because it is turning off these pixels, but it isn't really realistic. QLED may not have those DEEP, RICH blacks because they don't turn off pixels. Even at the lowest power, there is still power and therefore, some light. While this may not be as visually pleasing, It IS more correct to the world... In my opinion. My real question (that I don't have an answer for yet) is who has the deepest PERCEPTIBLE black. By that I mean, what TV has a lower black level while there is still power to the pixel. THAT is the more important number. Not everything dark is BLACK. Turning off a pixel allows no hint of what color is there in the dark. QLED is still producing light even in that darkest area (like the world does) and therefore can put a hint of red or blue in there as well. It still seems black, but that ever so slight hint of color is the difference between REAL and PRETTY. I personally like REAL. COLOR: This is where the 2 TVs really stand apart. For my work, I am interested most in Color Volume and Color Accuracy. In both of those areas, The SAMSUNG TVs are higher in the specs. (and in various tests, even though the independent tests fell a bit short of the numbers provided by Samsung... but what TV doesn't?) In color volume, The SAMSUNG QLED can reach 99.6% of DCIP3 Color space. (Digital Cinema Initiatives) It is the 1st TV to get anywhere that high. (Ironically, the Samsung Galaxy s8 Phone gets 113% with an AMOLED screen... In a phone... That is just nuts!) The Samsung also WILL have the ability to auto calibrate itself with "Calman Autocal" and a Colorrite Colorometer. This means we can continually keep it tuned and keep the color spectrum as true to correct as possible. MY OPINION: All of that has been opinion supported with facts. The OLED TVs are all about BIG COLOR and DEEP Colors... but that doesn't mean TRUE COLOR. So that is the question. If you want something that LOOKS better because it is "MORE" than real... then OLED is for you! And understand, I'm not bashing that opinion at all! It is totally valid and if I'm honest when you compare the 2 side by side, the OLED is more pleasing to my eye. But so do Hormone induced strawberries when sitting next to organic ones. It doesn't mean that it is more true to the reality of what you are seeing. In the end, I feel like the Samsung is more like a window on the world rather than a technical representation of it. As a colorist, I'd rather see TRUE color instead of Pretty colors. While I've not made the purchase yet, I'm leaning toward the SAMSUNG QLED. (Like 85% at this point) Unless Sony shows me something I've missed soon, I'm about a month away from buying the QLED. (once the check for my last gig comes in).

So you do Know that Samsung released an update that fixed the problems that rtings talked about (off angled viewing & brightness, and contrast)? If you put the 900e, Q7, and an B6 side by side each TV is going to have one up on the other i.e. color for q7, black levels on the B6, and price point on the 900e (not a big enough difference between 900 and 930e to consider it over). I have personally seen the Q7 before and after the update and there is a big difference and hands down when they talk about the color and brightness on the Q7 there's not a TV that's as good (except maybe the Z9 but hey that's $1500 more). Opinion wise I don't like the oled, brightness isn't good enough for everday use and the whole Dolby vision aspect is useless with a TV that wont break 800 nits (with the upcoming update id save for the Z9 that will handle far better than any oled with dolby vision). Also the Quantum dots of 2017 are different that the ones of 2016 where they added sub pixels for the brighter more accurate color. Being on the OLED band wagon you certainly are a little biased but doing a warning about something you've never seen is certainly discrediting in its own right.

What is my the flashing and flickering sometimes when I watching a show?

I saw them in store and they look totally stunning.

Anyone know if the lifespan is good? I heard that oled’s lighting dies faster (i know nothing about tv’s) lol

Would you recommend the X900 or Q7F in both 65 inch for gaming and watching movies?

QlED on sale rn for 799$ what you guys think worth it at that price point? I already got a 55" inch 4k hdr TV I'm using it mainly for gaming tho.

I was looking into getting the UN78KS9800. Or should I buy the qled 75''? The KS9800 is full array back lighting. And the New QLED are edge array back lighting. Which one is better? Is the KS9800 Better then the ks8000? Eveyone said that the ks8000 is a good tv.

Guys - I am thinking to upgrade my TV can you please let me know which model to buy? Samsung or Sony? i have seen here in Netherlands with 500 euros cash back i can get this tv for 1900euros. BUt not sure if its worth.

OK thank you I'm looking to buy one but like you said it's vary pricey,, what do you recommend I'm looking for 75 or 80 curved smart 4k with as much now a day features as possible thank you!

I want to buy an 75" model. was eyeing at the samsung qled... wich 75" brand / model would you recommend?

So, what 65in TV should I buy this Christmas. I'm getting the new Xbox Scorpio and maybe I should look at Sony's extreme chip as I've heard they have great processing.. Sorry, to bother you on Easter. Have a great Easter with your family and God bless! Nick

Have you gotten any image retention or burn -ins on your oled tv since you've owned it?

Hello, I am one of those people who have been watching OLED technology develop over the past 10+ years, anxiously awaiting OLED Tv’s. Unfortunately I have encountered problems with OLED that I simply can’t ignore. Last time I visited Best Buy to check out the newest OLED & QLED Tv’s I was disappointed to discover that every single OLED on display had significant burn in issues. Every single OLED TV!! I am sure that Best Buy is hard on their TV’s but in my family I have three young boys and it is common for them to leave the TV with static images for many hours and I think there is a real possibility that I would end up with burn in issues. Best Buy’s extended warranty covers burn in so I would definitely get the warranty if I were to buy an OLED. On the other hand, in my subjective opinion the QLED has an outstanding picture. They are definitely much brighter than OLED’s and in my opinion have better color quality. I know that technically the OLED has blacker blacks but it is very hard for me to perceive the difference. To my eye’s the QLED blacks are very dark. Also, to my eye’s the QLED picture is MUCH better than the best LED’s. I guess what I am saying is that maybe the differences between the TV’s is more nuanced than you indicated. If I were to buy a TV today I would either buy a Sony OLED with the BB extended warranty or one of the QLED’s. It will be interesting to see what improvements we will see in 2018 with the new OLED’s and the Samsung micro dot technology.

I have a question looking to upgrade my television my options are Samsung un55 q6f AMF qled or mu9000 or ks9000 what would be best trying to stay under $1,000

Hi, if i can get the qled Q7f 55 inch or the mu800065 inch both for the same price wich one should i get?

It pretty clear that you are a LG fan and your trying to push negative stuff about Samsung just because you like a different brand. Please take note that not everyone should like what you do, and if you wanna prove something to someone, try and get your own facts. Don't come with other websites comments or stuff that other people did. You didnt do anything here but to promote other peoples bullshit on other websites. So please, do your own research, open up a TV , test it yourself and film it, then start giving opinions based on what experience you had. Cheers

So.... you're doing a review.... of a review? Real life review please not some websites with clicks. Also, your using one source of reference.

LG's gamble with OLED is paying off. OLED will become the standard in much the same way BLU RAY beat HD DVD, and VHS beat Beta. Samsung knows they are falling behind, and so they are trying to use marketing gimmicks as a desperate effort to close the gap between Led and OLED technologies. Panasonic and Sony are trying to catch up in the OLED market, and Samsung is quickly falling to the back of the pack. Once you see OLED, it's pretty hard to go back to LED.

Now that oppo 4k player is no longer. What other 4k player with Dolby vision & reasonable & reliable do u recommend??.

I heard the 2018 q 6 is better is this true in the larger screen versions

is it worth buying a 65 inch 4K led TV when not intending to watch 4K channels or movies, basically for up-scaling and KZfaq videos or a 1080p oled TV or equivalent or slightly smaller size?

I was planning to buy QLED for my first 4k TV and i want to use it exclusively for pc monitor so i need to buy the one with very low lag input. Unfortunately most of LG OLED doesnt have lower than 30ms lag input. Am i stuck with samsung?

I just purchased a 65" Q8C worth every penny I've never seen colors so vivid and it works amazing with my PC.

Sorry I did a personal viewing of the top LG OLED and top Samsung QLED Q9FN and Samsung came out on top besides OLED is still subject to image retention AKA burn in

Burn marks. How long are you guys leaving on your TV

Led tv with a Q stamp on the front....that's cute Samsung..:)

I love to get oled but do you know what AM unable to fix 55inch in my home, biggist i can go is 49 and do you know samsung is doing 49inch for there q7 tv, i do not care if it is 2k beocuse in my books am unable to use oled, also q7 is the best i can get atm. (p.s am in the uk)

What's your opinion on the LG oled 9600?

Thanks for the shout out 😃😎, I currently own the KS8500 and it looks amazing no need to upgrade to Qled.

U are glossing over the screen burn in. It really sucks that you are doing that. An best buy employee told me that they have ton of returns from that.

A comparison based on results of a webpage. You are a real professional.

I appreciate the perspective. Have you seen how the screen reacts to polarized lens glasses? I found that samsung QLED and sony OLED the best even using LG's panel are ideal as LG tv's I have to tilt my head to watch. There are more reasons for one tv over another. LG, vs Sony, vs Samsung meh.

I have LG e7n 2017 55 in and iam really so happy with it till now I didn't see screen quality like what I have for everything

Thanks for the heads up.

New Subscriber. Love the Facts. Great Job.

I purchased an LG UHD OLED television about 6 months ago. I could not be happier.

Got one yesterday and it’s dope I like it personally

I love my 2018 Samsung Q6F QLED. Amazing picture quality. Colors pop out and clarity is unbelievable. Samsung hit these TVs out of the ball park. OLED have burn-in and are only good in very dark rooms and cost a lot more and won't last as long as a QLED and darker picture that is not as bright as a QLED. The 2017 Samsung QLED were not good but the 2018's are amazing.

Thanks for this- I'm one of the suckers who bought the QLED. The tv itself has been great, but the One Connect cable snaps incredibly easily and costs $300 to replace. I'm still kicking my own ass and I wish I could return it- and I wish I'd seen this video. Subbed.

Actually seen this at Best Buy! Best looking picture ever so far! I liked it better then pled LG

Very happy with my samsung q8fn. Absolutely no burn as i have kids and they leave tv on. I sctually turned brightness down. This tv is great. I have sonys, pioneer elite but this sammy blows everything out of the water.

I work in home theatre, and I do agree samsung slapped a QLED tag (can't blame them for marketing tactics and product placement next to OLED) and definitely increased the $$ I bought an 65" 8C (employee discount) and the brightness levels (nits) are much higher compared to a 7c. That said if you dont want a "fancy" looking tv, but get the best bang for your buck go with a sony 900E. The 930E is a bit nicer but not worth the extra $ . Thanks for the review!

Thank you sooooo much for your honest appraisal! 👌 Hugely appreciated your video. I need to buy my 85 year old Dad a new TV but quite frankly, it's starting to do my head in big time 😣 Cheers.

QLED may not be a big thing in the TV market but it's pretty nice in computer monitor market. VA panels allow IPS like experience with low latency and high refresh rate and HDR capability. I just purchased a Samsung CHG90.

Just bought my 2nd Oled this time a 55in E6, I have a 65in c6 also. The picture on the e6 is slightly better it's a little brighter for sure plus it comes with a sound bar so I love it but still love my curved oled too. Both TVs have 3D even though I won't use it much I like having the option. I was lucky enough to catch an open box for a deal I couldn't pass up so I jumped on it (nohomo) OLEDs are expensive but like any TV you just have to know when to buy.

the very big advantage of oled in the qled w/c is the oled is energy saving because it doesn't have a backlighting which can't produce more lights unlike the qled is a higher brightness that can produce more lights so a highly consumption watt .

I´m thinking of getting a new TV for games in a dark room. That means clouding, flashlights and stuff will be very noticeable for me if I use an LED. And I HATE this stuff. Thats why I consider an OLED. Is the ABL and screen retention really a big problems for games? Mabe it ist even worse than clouding and stuff...

I have the same TV you have the OLED 65 upstairs in my bedroom the problem is I need a bigger TV OLED don't have 80-plus for my downstairs so the Samsung 82 inch would be perfect the only problem the q6 with the legs the way they are won't fit on my stand I have to go with the nu8000 82

My sound sounds bad because Im doing a review at work. Lol. Doing a review at work? Like how you go straight to an L G tv checking it out. How much you just paid for that one?

I really like the LG OLEDs but I did find a new 2019 Samsung 65 inch Q80R on sale for $1999 which is a great deal. I wouldn't pay the MSRP at $2900 though. I don't regret it's a great TV.

Guys I've seen this tv side by side to an OLED and the colours are beyond fathomable the Qled is amazing

I have last year's model the ks8000

I'm no genius, but doesn't "great color volume" mean that the image actually retains its color off angle rather than having an extreme wash out effect? Also, you didn't mention the nits of the LG? Also, what is the black level difference? How much of the DCI-P3 does the LG OLED reach? Does 4K content utilize the depth of black level on the LG? Also, if you purchased in November doesn't that mean you were comparing 2016 holiday pricing to a 2017 just released pricing? Also, in what environment did rtings do the testing? Was it a controlled lighting environment (the reason I ask is because the average living room isn't a controlled lighting environment)? Also, image retention means burn in right? Does the QLED have burn in? If an OLED gets burn in what is the repair process cost and time frame? Just a few questions that weren't answered all while encouraging people to spend a few thousand...

Starting to look into TVs, was basically set wanting a 4K, OLED with HDR. Saw these QLEDs in the shop, and thought they looked really good (didn't spend enough time to compare with the OLED). I wasn't aware at first that QLEDs are actually still LCDs, took me a few Google search results researching the technology before I figured that out. So far, I've been able to gather, QLEDs are brighter than OLED, but OLED has far better blacks (which is why i'm interested in OLED) Thanks for this video, it's been a great help in my research. I'm looking at the LG C7 OLED 55" atm, which seems to score even Higher than the E6 you talk about in the video

I got the QN75Q6 Flat 75" QLED 4K for $1,900 and thats how u do it, wait till the next year models when they drop the prices. The tv is worth EVERY PENNY !!!

what is a real world use? like using it outside? or in a lit room with a bunch of natural sunlight, ruining the quality of which you see?

I don't thrust that website too much, they say my tv don't have uniform grays colors, and they were wrong

Yea turns out it had to do with the shipping process and rough transport of the tv. To prove it rtings put the tv back in the box and dropped it a few times and the brightness went up.

Isn't it kind of interesting that Rtings slammed that Samsung QLED for something it straight up ignores for OLEDs (brightness)? HDR is the reason I would buy a 4K TV. HDR is supposed to be based on high brightness levels. Otherwise, you wouldn't need a certain brightness level to get the premium HDR TV certification. HOWEVER, this isn't the case for OLEDs. The rules were changed for them. Yes, OLEDs have perfect blacks. But, color volume is the way to get me. If your TV can only get to 1/3 the levels my TV can get, I am seeing more lifelike colors. Your TVs would just give you great shadow details. In the real world, most movies mastered are to 4000 nits to 10,000 nits. Most scenes are not in the darkest of areas (where OLED beats LCD tech). I don't think a lot of people understand that very LITTLE perceived difference between a top tier LCD TV and an OLED, where OLEDs start to out perform LCDs (darkness-wise). Therefore, I need a TV that has the highest nits. HDR is about brightness and lifelike colors without image retention. And, no, I'm not a Samsung fanboy. I own very little in the way of Samsung products. By the same token, I'm not an OLED fanboy. There are things OLEDs are great at (largely SD content). They are unbeatable at that. When it comes to turning SD content into NEAR HDR content and HDR content, LCD wins. Some people pick an OLED for the extremely small amount of dark content were OLEDs can go darker. I pick LCD (but NOT the new Samsung QLEDs) for all the OTHER times. EDIT: Also, Samsung never said they had perfect side viewing, as Rtings hinted at. Samsung said they are offering BETTER viewing angles. There is a difference. ;)

What if the consumer light the better contrast ratio during brighter images? With man rating websites such as the one you're using it's all very opinion based, when you rate each one of the specifications outside the image the ratings are also going to vary such as with the no gap mount and one connect box Samsung offers. It's known all around not just in TVs that Samsung is doing different things to improve their products and are taking risks that are paying off much more. The image might not be much different from last years but the features of the TV itself are improved

Earned a sub. + like!

GREAT heads up for myself as I'm looking to upgrade this December. I think OLED is the way to go now!

Check the QLED 75” price vs the similar size OLED.

Thanks for this

Really Top but We wish and need soon to be all the display screen TV from samsung in 11K OLED not just for mobiles in the future

I laughed my ass off when I saw this at CES.

I wanted to point out,that if you go on the Samsung website and look at the QLED screen shots they have a image comparing 2016 SUHD tv's vs QLED,and the colors on the 2016 side are all gray and washed out.That's B.S because I have a 2016 SUHD tv and it doesn't look like that.I also doubt that the "new refined metal quantum dots" make that much of a difference compared to the 2016 QD's.Also you can find that same screen shot on Amazon,but instead of saying 2016 SUHD tv's it compares it to Full HD tv's,but it's the same screen shot.Seems fishy to me.

I went with the 65 inch C6P OLED after taking back Sony 65 930D due to excessive clouding. The 930D was a damn good looking TV, looked better than my OLED in the day time. Unfortunately turning off the lights at night the TV was almost unwatchable with large grey spots.

you shoul make a video about oled burn in...how about that..

I got the 55 QLED for 2k and it's awesome.

absolute legend! first person to say the truth about this subject online. I really dont understand why it has so many dislikes

QLED is still LCD technology if anyone doesn't know

I kinda hate to say this but waiting for new tech at this time may be the best to do. Miro led sounds promising and hope the price comes down on it some and they market it more next year

Right thanks for this still gonna be buying samsung qled all my electronic are samsung anyway. Won't need minute differences as I m a regular user

OLED is best TV money can buy, everyone know it, if someone tell you something else they don't know what they talking about. OLED Panels made only by LG today, you can buy OLED from Sony or Panasonic or Loewe , all 3 have LG panel inside , and all 3 are High End models and sold as best possible TV ever .

Got the 55 Q7F a few weeks ago and its awesome. I dont ever look at subjective number based ratings. Home Theater magazine had a decent review on this and the picture is impressive without the risk of burn in that exists with OLED and AMOLED at present. It's true QLED is an light modulation trick for conventional LED tech that allows them to achieve almost the same black levels as OLED/Plasma. Better black levels translates to better color accuracy. Can't comment on the performance as a computer monitor but the image is amazing off of BR and Netflix from Chromecast. This TV is expensive and is not for everyone most definitely but if you want OLED performance but have reservations about the durability of the screen if you tend to leave static images up then conventional full-array ( Sony XBR series, Samsung, and LG ) have a few models each or QLED is an option as well. LG is always a little less expensive than Samsung as they are still trying to capture market share in the US. Once properly calibrated the image on most modern high end TVs should be excellent. Yes Samsung TVs command a higher price, yes Samsung spends a boatload on marketing, but do not buy a TV based on semi subjective numbers based ratings. Here is why. Rtings said bluntly in their review of my TV with respect to color accuracy that it is significantly better than the LG OLEDs which is to be expected. They drew the intensely subjective conclusion however that this TV is a poor value for the money. IMO at this pricepoint all TVs are a "poor value" if you want a good value buy a Vizio if you want state of the art performance you buy Sony, Samsung, LG. A 10-20 percent difference in price at this level should not have an effect on affordability as its like complaining that a BMW 5 series is a poor value for the money. If someone believes that then they should go over to the Honda dealer where they probably belong.

Do a follow up on the new ones bet it's a different outcome

thats true , quantum mechanics is being used but not really there yet,

Doesn't LG's WOLED is not completely true OLED panel? I mean for the light-emitting side, yes it is OLED tech but because of organic material short-lifespan LG decided to use white OLED as a pixel with color filter on top. So the color producing side it's still not quite true OLED(it's like best version of LCD though because of per pixel lighting). As I'm an OLED fan I still think that brightness is very important for HDR even if the UHD Premium standard for OLED brightness is lower than LCD but the color volume doesn't quite match LCD with higher brightness yet. Until OLED can get a brightness floating around 1000nits (with true OLED tech) , I'll give a winner in term of HDR to LCD(with higher brightness) anyway. (Samsung QLED as you mentioned is not count though.)

How old are you Bro

This is why I am sticking with my KS8000. It is the best LED TV, and the second best TV close to the LG OLED of last year.

I know this video was posted a couple of years ago, but this is still the case today.

I agree with U 100 % , but the remote on the Samsung iz a simple 1 touch n awesome the LG iz got a 1000 buttons n good luck !

I have a question. 1) why are you comparing the q7 to the e6 signature line? of course there's no comparison. if you want to do a true comparison do it to the q9

I would argue that unless you are 2 feet from any 4K screen you are not going to notice much of a difference. The suggested distance is 1 to 1.5 times the screen diagonal. Finally, the two technologies are totally different. I have seen both sets up close and honestly, think they are both great I do like the one connect hub upgrade path for Samsung tv's. Finally, why would you ever play competitive games on 4K@60hz TV I would also wait to make any decisions until we start seeing properly graded HDR content.

Getting a Q9 tomorrow we will see. Got 45 days to return. My feeling is rtings is always leaning towards Sony and LG. If you look at other ratings on the Q series the ratings are much higher. Why else don't you think the Q9 hasn't been reviewed by them, because "it is the best led LCD tv ever made and outperforms OLED in a lot of ways" I was fortunate enough to go see all the TVs in person and choose what looked and performed the best to me. Unfortunately if the Q9 does not impress me on my home environment I will have to go with the runner up darker less impressive lg oled g7 or A1E.

Please help my wife wants to buy a new TV under $1500 at 55” for New Years. I have always had Samsung but liked you information on Samsung not being all it was said to be. So please help us out.

Love your channel but I do have to disagree (somewhat) with your contention that QLED is crap. When I visit Best Buy to view flatscreens with Samsung QLED and LG OLED devices displayed side by side it's clearly obvious that OLED has a superior picture with crisper images and deep, deep blacks. But, in my opinion, QLED is the obvious choice if you don't want to spend twice the money on a great screen. Just over a year ago I purchased a 2017 Samsung 55" Q6F for just over $1000 which had just been price dropped from $1500. An OLED would have been my first choice but that would have required spending at least twice as much. After using the Samsung for a year now I'm more than happy with it. Except for.... A week ago the Q6F started displaying problems with its HDMI Arc CEC connection. It's connected to an Onkyo TX-NR686 (which you recently reviewed) and for some reason failed to see the amp correctly and would not push audio. It would only use the Q6F's onboard speakers. As well, the optical sound output failed. The one year Samsung warranty had just run out....(damn, should have bought the extended warranty) so I was just a little more than pissed. Googling the problem online revealed it's not an isolated problem. Resolved the situation by moving my Roku Ultra and Playstation to the Onkyo and all is well. My fingers are crossed that the Q6F won't have any further problems. With that caveat, I'm still happy with the Q6F but would rethink purchasing another Samsung but not due to the picture quality. My previous TV was a 12-year-old Toshiba Regza that never had a single issue in its life and is still in use by a friend I gave it to. Come on Samsung...you can do better!!

Get a Sony ZD9 or XE900

glooks bro bro---been a Samsung fan since i can remember--but with these tvs--i just wasnt trusting them. Samsung is the first tv i ever purchased...time to switch---thanks man i really appreciate it. GodBless

Super, I agree !!

They are the best for led.so you either like oled better or go with something that will have burn in.it will last longer too.with that said, oled has a better picture by far but they come with problems, that samsungs tvs wont.

You should do an update of this video cuz 1) the 2018 Q7 got a much better rating overall and 2) its not $4000....I know cuz I didnt pay 4K for my Q7. They might have nifty PR campaigns but Samsung do make good TVs. That not not say LG doesn't cuz they too have nice looking TVs too. Its personal preference, I've always been a samsung person. Guess it's all on the eye of the beholder

I think for the price tag a fald system like Panasonic's x902 honeycomb structure implementation or Sony's higher end z9d would be more fitting. I currently own a Sony x850c/55" 4K TV. It's a great TV with triluminous tech (qd), but having picked up on edge light bleed at times, its lack of local dimming and lack of quality HDR. Either a FALD LED TV or OLED are my only potential upgrades. So with these Samsung TVs being edge lit, it's pushing me away from them. Brightness and black levels are a double edged sword in HDR land. You can either push brightness to its max and have decent blacks but with the defects of led backlight tech, or you can have ridiculously amazing blacks with pixel by pixel dimming with close to 1000nits currently with 97-99% DCI colour accuracy. also depends on if u are a home theater enthusiast or it's a living room tv

I had a KS8000 last year and the panel went bad after a few months. Returned it to BB and bought a Sony X93D and wow does sony's true motion 960 X1 chip deliver the smoothest picture I ever seen. Samsung's 240hz is a juddering mess. Next tv I get will be a Samsung Q series or a LG/Sony OLED. Even the P series from Vizio looks great.

I looking at buying 65" Q7F! It the best UHD TV on the market today! I like the look and sharpness of the Q7F! Blows the OLED from Sony away!

The reviews at rtings.com show 36.8 ms lag for the LG E6 @4k+HDR vs Q7F doing 24.4 ms. And despite that they give the same 8.4 score to both TVs. On non-HDR gaming the difference in score is 8.5 vs 8.4, for a 20.3 ms vs 34.1 ms: 0.1 difference in score when comparing the best input lag TV to an average one.

I got a 75" QLED for 2300 i don't have a problem with the TV it's a great TV!!

They are the best for what they do.