Cutting The Chaff: Rafale And What Ails Defence Procurement In India | Abhijit Iyer Mitra

Cutting The Chaff: Rafale And What Ails Defence Procurement In India | Abhijit Iyer Mitra | MMRCA

Рет қаралды 191,777

4 жыл бұрын

This talk discusses all the misinformation being spread about the Rafale, and the larger macro impact it has on the defence of the country as well as the state of defence commentary and education in the country.
In this talk Abhijit simplifies the defence procurement process, gives us the background and sets the context. He proceeds to walk us through the Rafael deal, the scandal surrounding this deal and it clarifies the historical issues with defence procurement in India.
About the Speaker: -
Abhijit Iyer-Mitra is Senior Fellow at the Institute of Peace & Conflict Studies. A Defence Economist, he has regular columns in the Economic Times & Business Standard as well as bylines in all major dailies and the New York Times. He also has co authored two books, one on military reforms and another on Afghanistan and has several academic publications to his credit dealing with defence and foreign policy. Prior to his current post he coordinated the National Security Programme at the Observer Research Foundation, was visiting scholar at Sandia National Laboratories (Albuquerque) & at the Stimson Center (Washington D C). His hobbies include flying recreational aircraft and scuba diving and he is the proud parent of two dogs and a cat.
Join us on Telegram : t.me/srijanfn
Follow Us on Social Media :
Twitter : / srijanfn
Facebook : / srijanfoundation
Subscribe to Srijan Talks: bit.ly/2PU6JxG
More About Us : srijantalks.org/
#Rafale
#MMRCA
#SrijanTalks

Пікірлер: 763

@sriharshanamuduri8694 4 жыл бұрын

Abhijit makes SO MUCH SENSE.He does explain complex things in so everyday language that listener doesnot get bored.

@syedhasan3078 4 жыл бұрын

Pakistan zindabad

@advocate_trivedi 4 жыл бұрын

Syed Hassan ok

@soumya_ditya 3 жыл бұрын

@@syedhasan3078 ok,thik hay. Ab nikal,peheli fursat mein nikal.

@prof.dr.4224 3 жыл бұрын

A commerce graduate is talking about aircraft technology and strategy!!!!

@parassaini9748 2 жыл бұрын

@@prof.dr.4224 his cigars cost more than your education.

@Electronics61 4 жыл бұрын

Rahul Gandhu was making heavy weather during the entire election. Thank God he did not win. He would have created boffer II.

@vinayak615 4 жыл бұрын

Bofors 2

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

Mr Gandhi and the entire Congress party had lied to the nation. They had lied so much that every time they opened their mouth, a lie came out. They were spearheading the misinformation campaign against this government for their electoral goal. One lesson the citizens should learn, always pay attention to the government and its agencies statements. Those in media houses could spread misinformation. India's acquisition of 36 Rafale is one of the finest deals India has procured in India's procurement history. It was never a scam from the day one. Do well. Jai Hind.

@master4473 4 жыл бұрын

Isn't Indian military very strong? Why still buy French planes？？？

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

@@master4473 China too buy Russian planes and choppers. This is a common norm to buy any equipment which your forces think will be considered good for defence. India and China should build and strengthen strategic relations. Very important for both countries to come forward and involve more p2p contacts.

@master4473 4 жыл бұрын

@@varunv.chadha492 But five years ago, China basically did not buy foreign weapons, and the rate of self-made weapons could reach more than 80%.

@avghanekar123 4 жыл бұрын

We are paying heavy Price for not selecting Mirage 2000 MRCA contract. Joint chutiyappa by congress and IAF

@tatai1001 4 жыл бұрын

yeah,the IAF is as much responsible as the cancer that is congress.

@gopaljee1467 4 жыл бұрын

I don't think so Only thing that has gone wrong that kaveri engine technologies we could not get

@adisura9904 4 жыл бұрын

I am pretty sure IAF would have gone for better equipment alot earlier if not for the lack of political will.

@andyt7159 4 жыл бұрын

AVG it was BJP under vajpayee that bought SUKhoi .

@avghanekar123 4 жыл бұрын

@@andyt7159 Are you drunk ? Mirage 2000 was offered during UPA1 before MMRCA which IAF n UPA didn't take seriously. TEJAS MK2 will be equivalent to Mirage 2000 after 2032. So we are so much behind the world. Had mirage was bought in 100 nos it would have been awesome deal

@sridharmurthy1076 4 жыл бұрын

Very informative and enlightening. Hope the opposition leaders hear this, enough to convince them. N. Ram

@gauraavguptaaa 4 жыл бұрын

N Ram is a Fuddu.... SHakal pe likha hai uski... Aaaj kal jo engreji bolta hai wahi samajhdar hai.. Brahman waad ka naya rup

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

Sir, for 2 years before the elections, the congress party started spreading 'misinformation' about India's procurement of 36 war ready Rafale aircraft directly from the French Government. Virtually every media house toed the sensationalized allegation based on false, or selective misinformation. Every time the Congress party, in particular their then president, Rahul Gandhi, opened his mouth, he lied. P Chidambram, the quiet one, camouflaged his questioning at ED with the Rafale sensationalized fake news, published in The Hindu. The next day, PIL's were filed based on false information to mislead the country. If you remember, Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie, and Prashant Bhushan had filed a PIL. They all were a part of the misinformation campaign. AAP's Sanjay Singh too was a part of the misinformation campaign against the Modi Govt. N Ram, a former business partner of P Chidambram, used selective information to create doubts in people's mind. P Chidambram wrote misleading articles in Indian Express. All was done to stop BJP forming majority. Every one wanted to remove one man. The unfortunate part was, such individuals have got away with 'fooling people'.

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

Sir, here is a presentation of former chairman CNC, for 36 RAFALE, IGA, at an IAF interim conference at CAPS, Delhi. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/adR5gb2BmZuYemg.html Every word he says is worth gold. Please have a listen. Take notes, if need be. If at all you come across with people who still doubts, please remove their doubts. There are some fantastic literature available for Indias procurement of 36 Rafale, in particular, a work by Nitin Gokhale. His book and his presentation at KZfaq also is informative. Do well, sir. Jai Hind.

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

@john doe Apples and oranges, sir. 🙏 The two are incomparable.

@jasha9sandhu 4 жыл бұрын

Brutal logic , insightful analysis and engaging articulation of Abhijeet Iyer Mitra 👌👌

@harishmasand3532 4 жыл бұрын

I just happened to come across this video of Abhijit Iyer-Mitra of last year. The issues raised by him need to addressed and corrected by someone in the know to bring out the true facts. While the issues are many, I will address only the essential ones to keep these comments as concise as possible. Abhijit has not only got most of his facts wrong but also misunderstood some basic science. For example, he talks of the French LCDs on the Su-30s burning out because of wrong power inputs on Russian aircraft. To explain this issue in simple terms, the electricity at our homes is supplied at 220 Volts. At this voltage, a 10 watt bulb doesn't burn out any faster as compared to a 30 or 60 watt bulb as long as all the bulbs are built for 220V and the supply is within acceptable limits. In an aircraft, the power output, AC or DC, is stabilized within far more stringent limits compatible with the power requirements of all the systems integrated on the aircraft. Therefore, Abhijit's example of 110 Volts versus 220 Volts is highly misleading. As another example, he uses the term "thermocline", without truly understanding what a thermocline is, to state why the Su-30 range reduces from 3500 Km in Russia to just 500 Km in India. Please just look up the dictionary and you'll know what I'm saying. A temperature difference would certainly affect the performance and the range of the aircraft but not by such an exaggerated amount. Unfortunately also, Abhijit quotes the Bofors scandal as the basis for the IAF having "missed out two cycles of modernization/upgradation" without having taken into account the DARIN upgrade on the Jaguar of the late 1980s and the MiG-21 Bis Upgrade, or Bison as it's called, of the mid-1990s, perhaps because he was just a young boy then and didn't know. Mid-life upgrades are a regular feature in most air forces even without shortage of aircraft due to technological advancements and the requirements of the future battle. And it is pilots and engineers of the Air Force which examine and finally decide on the requirements to fight the battle. I was in charge of the MiG-21 Bis Upgrade Program till contract signing in 1996 so I can speak with some authority on how we went about designing a system architecture to integrate different systems working on GOST, ARINC 429 and MIL 1553 buses. Even in this economical upgrade, costing us barely $ 4 million per aircraft including all the initial weapons and spares for 6 bases, 6 squadrons and 12 detachments, we successfully integrated the Israeli EW pod with the Russian radar and Indian RWR called Tarang. The performance of the Bison in the engagement of February 27, 2019 speaks for itself. Therefore, to say that we couldn't do it in the Su-30 almost a decade later would be difficult to ascribe to a mere factual error. Even the later MiG-29 upgrade successfully integrates such systems as per our requirements. Such integration is certainly not rocket science. Abhijit also forgets the other minor upgrades the IAF has been able to do on its own from time to time like the Magic missile on the Jaguar, the R-73 missile on the Mirage and the Litening pod even without access to the source codes. The integration of the BrahMos and Astra missiles on the Su-30 also need to be kept in mind in this regard. In the Rafale, this being a direct purchase of just 36 aircraft, I am not certain we would get the source codes to do future upgrades on our own. It is also factually incorrect that the Su-30 was realized to be a failure by about 2007 and that is why India decided to cover up this failure and buy Rafales. In 2001, we had signed up for licence manufacture of 140 Su-30MKIs by HAL and the original contract of 1996 envisaged upgrade of the initial lot of 50 Su-30Ks to these MKI standards. That brings the total to 190 Su-30s. Thereafter, we have added to this program and acquired more Su-30s to bring the total to 272 and now, with the recent 12, to 284 with progressive upgrades based on technological advances. If the program or the aircraft was a failure, this could not have been done. I would leave the other assertions made by Abhijit on the Su-30 to be countered by the Su-30 Project Team, should they feel the need to do so. Further, I have been fortunate to have driven all kinds of fancy cars that Abhijit mentions to emphasize quality of a product. Let me tell you from personal experience that the quality of a Mercedes today would disappoint you, as compared to some of the other cheaper cars. I personally drove one of the cheaper ones on rent for almost 12,000 miles in about 45 days in a coast to coast road trip in the US a few years ago and can tell you, like someone said in the comments, only the Mercedes price is higher. Higher price is not necessarily a guarantee of better reliability. Considering this reliability factor, which impinges on maintenance including costs, spares management and availability, in our DPP, today, we insist on an MTBF-linked warranty based on the MiG-21 Bis Upgrade contract which came as a surprise to even US vendors. Research how we did it and you'll know the level of education and capabilities of the IAF. Abhijit also obviously does not know or remember all the facts behind the Rafale purchase. The initial requirement of 126 MRCAs (Multi-Role Combat Aircraft) was not for a Light Weight Fighter, as he calls it or even a twin-engined aircraft. I was Director ASR in 2000-01 and the ASRs, or QRs if you prefer, were being formulated at that time. For want of space, I would not comment on how the Rafale was chosen and then the deal stalled. For those who are interested, some more details on this imbroglio and other procurement issues are available in my article "Stemming the Slide" published in VAYU Issue V/2019, page 44 and also accessible at www.vayuaerospace.in/article.html?n=army-should-be-kept-out-of-politics&d=267. Abhijit also forgets his own deductions in "India and the Rafale: Anatomy of Bad Deal" published in 2012 and available at www.files.ethz.ch/isn/141926/SR126-NSP-IndiaandtheRafale.pdf. So, which Abhijit are we to believe, the one of 2012 or the new avatar of 2019-20? Also, as has been pointed out in some comments, it is unbelievable that if the L-1 refuses to comply with the conditions given in the RFP or reneges on some conditions/commercial terms during the contractual negotiations, it is not possible to invite the L-2. The DPP clearly provides for breaking up the purchase between L-1, L-2 an even L-3, if required. Commonsensical interpretation would mean that if the L-1 refuses to supply at all or refuses to enter into a contract, we could always invite the L-2, with a simple approval of competent authority. In this case, the reasons for the stalled deal are evident from my above- referred article and Abhijit's observation that the final price quoted by Dassault, even as L-1 was way beyond our budget or expectation, apart from the many disagreements in the negotiations, as highlighted by the CAG report on this deal in 2019. About Dassault's earlier honesty and lies this time that Abhijit alludes to, I'd leave it to the intelligence of the reader based on the cost of the Mirage upgrade at over $ 60 million a piece that India paid and Abhijit's previous article referred above. I also do not know Abhijit's source which led him to believe that PM Modi had no option but to go back to the Rafale in 2015. If PM Modi wanted, he could have done an intergovernmental deal with any of the vendors, just like the 21 MiG-29s and 12 Su-30s that are now being procured in a hurry. In my opinion, considering the depleting strength of the IAF and the fact that the Rafale had already been chosen earlier, PM Modi decided to buy a smaller quantity within available funds instead of going through a long procurement process by inviting fresh bids or issue of a fresh RFP. In addition, there may have been some political/diplomatic considerations but certainly nuclear delivery on Beijing or Shanghai was not one of these considerations. I wouldn't even go into the complexities of air delivery of nuclear weapons at that range in this forum. Suffice it to say that by 2020, when Rafale arrived in India, we have, and expected, ample other options in the nuclear triad in our inventory. Further, Abhijit's arguments on price protection are fallacious. For contracts in foreign currency, it has been a fixed and firm price for over 25 years now. Escalation for additional and optional supplies is as per a formula based on the actual inflation in the supplier country. Price protection only for domestic vendors is provided for based on the exchange rate variation. I would end by saying that Abhijit has been more than unkind in labeling the pilots and engineers of the IAF as of third world unable to employ what he calls "1st world technology". Going through the history of the IAF and its performance in various conflicts, as well as exercises, with quick assimilation of technology, innovative use and adaptation despite constraints of resources, one would come to the only logical conclusion that, against all odds, the IAF has generally done itself proud. Of Course, there is always a need for improvement in many areas, as in every other organization including air forces the world over, but this is a continuous and unending process based on informed and considered analysis. Abhijit is perhaps not aware of the internal mechanisms in the IAF at work in various such areas. I also wish he had done more research before making such unfounded insinuations against the IAF. If this talk had been given to an informed audience, he may have been severely castigated. Is that the reason for blanking out the Q & A section of this video?

@RajatNangia 4 жыл бұрын

Spot on.

@VijayChoprarohini 4 жыл бұрын

This is an excellent rebut. You have touched on all issues. 👍

@rameshrs607 4 жыл бұрын

I do not think Abhishek Iyer would be able to counter the clarifications given by Harish Masand. Those are very specific whereas Abhishek seems to be playing to the gallery by oversimplification. Sounds catchy but would not pass serious scrutiny.The elephant in the room is that of optimising our acquisitions with affordability.Harish has touched upon that , briefly in my view.

@shivavarma7661 4 жыл бұрын

Very well explained by Air Marshal Harish Masand.it would do well for Mr. Ashijeet to study the Traing of an IAF Pilots before making such derogatory references to them.

@basudevmukherji7991 4 жыл бұрын

Sir, please ignore these self styled media experts. We, now have a large number of TV channels and they are fronting anybody and everybody as experts in every field that you can think of. This particular area is very tempting for the "experts" since the knowledge level is very limited amongst the viewers and they do not turn off the channel as soon as rubbish starts getting stated. One would think that Mr Iyer Mitra should rather try to hush up his ignorance than publicise it.

@utubeminuteman2903 4 жыл бұрын

Recently I read an article by an retired air Force officer who says that Mig 29 consistently outperformed Mirage2000 .If Sukoi is so bad why IAF still wants more.

@brahmaputramoskva1215 4 жыл бұрын

@parth paul Our su-30 pilots also owned Eurofighter Typhoon

@anoopharidas9261 4 жыл бұрын

16:38 - 16:45 - The PM's reaction was an understatement. This is a horror story. With India as the tragic protagonist and her citizens as the villians. We can be lazy and say 'librandus' but let's face it, the underlying problems that led to this debacle are deeply ingrained in most if not all Indians.

@saratsaratchandran3085 4 жыл бұрын

Most expensive part of the air defense is the trained pilots!! Everything has to be done to save their lives and abilities. Invest for them.

@utkarshg.bharti9714 2 жыл бұрын

Till exam-chhaap morons run this country and we keep glorifying them, this will continue.

@rishabhbajpai21 4 жыл бұрын

Please don't edit videos when Abhijit is talking. His each and every word is an information worth 136 Rafale aircrafts. ;).

@enetok2479 4 жыл бұрын

Well Said !!! Absolutely Correct 😀😀

@master4473 4 жыл бұрын

Isn't Indian military very strong? Why still buy French planes？？？

@rishabhbajpai21 4 жыл бұрын

@@master4473 May be because they want to buy war tried and tested machines and not from whom who haven't fought a war for decades. By the way how strong an army is cannot be tested by from where it buys it weapons from.

@vivanranjan261 4 жыл бұрын

@Satanic Verses true

@vivanranjan261 4 жыл бұрын

@Satanic Verses true

@naushadlals 4 жыл бұрын

It's hilarious to know that when you float a tender, there were no provisions to cancel a bid if the bidders were not true !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@jakhannew 4 жыл бұрын

True. It's laughable. Every petty government contract has termination and default clause let alone big contracts. The way the government lost documents, went after CBI director and presented itself in court also raises serious concerns. Then there is this inexperienced company trying to Make in India jets. How come everybody is so incompetent and sloppy and yet this inexperienced company will churn out gold standard products. There is a method to this madness. This is not to go at anyone, but it shows super sloppiness and incompetence across the board; governments and courts included. It does not bode well for our country where the welfare of depraved citizens is sacrificed at the alter of incompetence. We deserve better.

@pvajit1109 3 жыл бұрын

Rafale is a very good fighter jet. Modiji's negotiation skill enabled India to purchase the jet at that price.

@shirish685 4 жыл бұрын

How simplistically and beautifully Abhijeet explained the complex subject. Hats off

@pbebington 4 жыл бұрын

Brilliant & elegantly simple explanation... Thank you.

@sanchitsinghiitg 4 жыл бұрын

Wonderful summary given by Mr. Abhijit Iyer; always like his talks. Kudos!

@thondupandrugtsang 4 жыл бұрын

Absolutely eye opening talk.

@Suhaibiq 4 жыл бұрын

amazing explanation and research done by Abhijit.

@agassijohnwilson8944 4 жыл бұрын

I seriously believe this entire video must be played it the parliament

@ankitkumarmahato4080 4 жыл бұрын

Brilliant! Abhijit sir, big fan of yours. Such details... I wonder what the govt. was upto.

@kumargk2305 4 жыл бұрын

Wah... Super explanation with elaborative narration.

@gnk6643 4 жыл бұрын

Lovely...... You have explained the whole issue extremely well n clearly...... People like you should sit in the government n take right decision...... Regards

@admahesh 4 жыл бұрын

Good presentation Abhijit! But what do you think is the best way forward w.r.t. aircraft at this juncture?

@pijushdey7647 4 жыл бұрын

Awesome interview he has given to indian people..we didnot know the past history of Raffale and its beautiful or dangerous characteristics and also knew about political dilemma

@suicidalthoughts5285 4 жыл бұрын

Woooow he never fails to amaze us great insight. I personally feel he should be working for our government. He has a lot of knowledge to share with the government.

@arindamdeb2057 4 жыл бұрын

Amazingly described......

@vijaimoor 4 жыл бұрын

Excellent presentation !! Need more journalists like him !!

@anooptiwari2011 4 жыл бұрын

You just cleared the facts, great!

@koul09876 4 жыл бұрын

WOW. Simply profound.

@sudhanshusharan5720 4 жыл бұрын

Brilliant lecture by Abhijit as usual 😊🙏🏽🇮🇳

@sumanmahu 3 жыл бұрын

awesome said. i have learnt many things from here

@kishorjamatkar9436 4 жыл бұрын

Absolutely amazing

@manishsood8649 4 жыл бұрын

One like is just not enough for such precise and informative facts... double likes and both thumbs up sir..

@quantumodality 4 жыл бұрын

Where can I find the whole video? I am curious to know what his opinions were on how the Russian, Israeli and French systems were integrated finally.

@gtanj 4 жыл бұрын

3:04 Extremely strange! Rafale was already introduced by then (2001) and the IAF must have been thinking about it. 3:55 India have diff systems operational on Su-30 MKI. Israeli, French and Indian. 7:35 Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam have Russian planes (engines), same for some more mid-East and African countries. 9:10 Political miscalculation? Israel supplies China with weaponry who in turn provide their inimical neighbors with the same. 9:25 Factually incorrect. Israel and Russia both have ~225 V supply to begin with but do you have this kind of supply in an aircraft? 9:38 India is still manufacturing Su-30 MKI's, just purchased more from Russia. Utter rubbish after a single Su-30 MKI dodged 4 AMRAAM's in Kashmir. 10:15 Pressure for technology transfer? 13:30 Sensible, very sensible now. Japan bought 105 F-35's for 23b USD. This is why an indigenous plane platform is a necessity. 18:15 Stop trolling Russian tech, it is childish. 26:20 Apples to apples comparison? 29:50 Russia is not known for civilian tech but military tech. 32:00 The IAF must be really stupid! Are you out of your mind? 37:10 IAF personnel, especially pilots are well trained and quite skilled.

@Blackfire970 4 жыл бұрын

Wow that's some research need to check them.

@nikhil199029 4 жыл бұрын

Iyer takes into account worse case scenarios

@rsjaurr 4 жыл бұрын

Exactly. This guy knows how to please present admin. Now which fighter plane undervalue their best fighter plane? No one but acc to this guy Rafael did just that. How childish

@meetadityanihlani 3 жыл бұрын

Wow dude he used the voltage thing as an example. How fucking dumb are you

@gtanj 3 жыл бұрын

@@meetadityanihlani You illegitimate son of a dumbarse, it is a very relevant to this discussion, not an example. And, I have listed myriad points. Unless, ofcs you have some other kind of affinity towards this dude. He is sharp, incisive but wrong on many points.

@brucevilla 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for Uploading.

@yashmandlecha 3 жыл бұрын

Very impressive. Excellent clarity of concepts.

@ronlal652 4 жыл бұрын

This dude knows his stuff,the best explanation that I have heard on the Rafael deal,hope Congress party is listening to this.

@lkshpnd69 4 жыл бұрын

How practicle he talks. Loved his solutions and suggestions..

@gauravdiwan2909 4 жыл бұрын

abhijit is spot on like everytime. maza ata hai sunne me.

@rambabuseethalam7578 4 жыл бұрын

Very nice explanation and hope business analysts of India enlighten the public

@akhileshpal8558 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for providing so much useful information

@Debdutta23 4 жыл бұрын

Sir , I must say u have put the problems on table in best possible way

@AS-td9rj 4 жыл бұрын

very well explained. Really opens my mind how the negotiation works on international platforms. Please start a series to help us to gain knowledge how these diplomatic ties actually works.

@master4473 4 жыл бұрын

Isn't Indian military very strong? Why still buy French planes？？？

@psuyog 3 жыл бұрын

@@master4473 Just like Chinese military initially trained, formed & designed by Germans including their Nazi style uniforms.

@amitavasen2469 4 жыл бұрын

Brilliant and sensible for us.

@adjoshi5 4 жыл бұрын

Fantastic !

@harshbehl4 4 жыл бұрын

Beautifully explained

@badbhanu007 4 жыл бұрын

Very enlightening👍🏻

@user-bp5dm4tp6c 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent

@jagsohal3832 4 жыл бұрын

Such a Accurate information this gentleman is sharing such a knowledgable it’s sad our ministers are completely unaware of technology

@srivastav1ankit 4 жыл бұрын

It’s a great talk - very detailed ! Mostly Agree with everything except at 34:01 ! Human capital is Indian air forces strength rather than weakness !

@Tintin-gv9ir 4 жыл бұрын

We need about 350 fighters right now but where is the money 1. Legalise Sports gambling - its already happening - How much tax it will collect ? 2. Legalise Blockchain transactions and invite exchanges to operate from India - How much tax will it collect ? 200 Grippen and 100 more Rafael from above money and add 50 F18 Super for Navy Then we work on Tejas 2 and 5the generation with public/private/SAAB/Rafael plus rope in Israel/Taiwan/Japan/Vietnam for co development and co production All will be well . Jai Hind

@mayookhchaudhuri7819 4 жыл бұрын

Ha khichdi pakane baithe ho na.. AAll is well !!

@Tintin-gv9ir 4 жыл бұрын

lol what Khichadi ? Bhai Plan is biryani here with kaju and kismish

@ghosh25281 4 жыл бұрын

less than 100 crores on the higher side.

@Tintin-gv9ir 4 жыл бұрын

@@ghosh25281 Ghosh bhai are you serious , do you know casino and gambling empires in world . Its a lot of money 100 crores will be a tip for idea . Pocket change . I am not talking about me and you gambling . the super rich of the worlds plus blockchain money is 246 billion only when market is down at the moment , with 57 billion daily transactions Think big . coinmarketcap.com

@NirvK 4 жыл бұрын

Not confusing at all! Thank you for sharing these insights. The question now is, how will the Govt, protect the knowledge transfer in case the French decide to take their technology back?

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

What do you mean by 'take their technology back'?

@balbhattfromthirdofsevenof7496 4 жыл бұрын

"We Invest in human being and not in platforms " or vice versa make up your mind ? what are you ? Brain Damage Drama Queen American-liar-Mitra? Ass holes they are very well trained (300 Hrs) ever heard of that ? What this guy thinks this is video game you open the box and start learning? They can fly unforgiving Mig 21 just like that? They can kill F-16 by Mig 21 by fluke ? This fart is telling you that upgrading to Iphone is difficult from bar phones , so pilots are shepherds ? Info processing is easy because of new age tech or difficult make up your mind! Israel got all the support from the west.for decades.. gas bag! How use of russian language by navy helped in deceiving during indo-pak war. So middle east russian mission were done in American and european jets? So second biggest defence supplier country is garbage supplying to 45 Countries and producing next gen weapons 1.Kinzhal 2.S500 3.Avangard 4.Poseidon 5.Burevestnik 6.Cyberwarfare? Then why american stole Mig 21 jet and Mi 25 heli to study. There is difference in quality and price of each manf say in case of Automobile. Even Merc & BMW are not that great reliable quality they used to be, ask any good trustworthy mechanic. F-35 EOL in 2050 we are still MiG 29 does not prove it's robustness? If operation & maintenance is not done even american will not stand up to the performance levels, in fact russian machines are far better in taking such beating then those fancy ones. China buying russian Su for fun or scrap value? F-35 is perfect ?? Japan dropped one in sea, and why Mitsubishi is developing it own Next generation Jet. Why Turkey happily swapped it despite being committed manf partner in fav of S400 and Sukhoi? If american ones this rabid Brain Damage Drama Queen American-liar-Mitra trying to sell are so great? Integration of Systems The SU-35MKI was tailor-made for Indian specifications and integrates Indian systems and avionics as well as French and Israeli sub-systems, so stop talking baloney. and do you guarantee future integration of russian missile or any other system from other country with rafael ? For all the reasons from geo-political this integration will always be a challenge until unless you become one supplier dependent, in fact that is also not possible in real world. Unless you have one end in your control either the equipment / aircraft / weapons systems. You are dependent period. That is also why we need to have indigenous 5th G Aircraft. Will american do it for you ? They are going to give away tech as russian do ? Never kept all eggs in one basket (Mirage and Mig) MMRC Rafael is far better in certain capability integrated technology, long range capability and smart weapons no doubts BUT Su-30 MKI supermaneuverable air dominance is one of the best fighters in the world in aerial combat. The redflag exercises between USAF and IAF demonstrate this. ....and he calls it failure ? Su-30 has a chance against the F-22 ->> www.ausairpower.net/APA-Flanker.html But what is the cost ? and isn't it high maintenance cost ? So over all high cost of purchase (Twice) as well as high maintenance cost (30%) and factor in more for currency issues, so fleet from 80% vs Sukhoi 50% is any way becomes offset against each other? But in terms of delivering weapons which fighter is meant for can it really do it all ? No. it carries a smaller less capable radar and fewer missiles than the Sukhoi. Su-30 MKI can employ many varieties of anti-ship missiles like3 × Kh-59MK,4 × Kh-356 × Kh-31A While Rafale on other hand has only MBDA AM 39-Exocet anti-ship missile. Su-30 MKI also employs varieties of Anti-Radiation Missiles like KH-31P and DRDO Anti-Radiation. Sukhoi (from 1995 era) has been backbone for two decades for IAF and will be continue to be so even after rafel procurement of one Sq is complete.When F-35 is getting obsolete in 2050! So here he conveniently forgets that it also needs technological upgradation as per is own admission in last four decades? Gas bag can you afford to buy Merc / BMW for all your sq. and they are really worth Despite the Sukhoi Su-30MKI is the most modern fighter jet in IAF inventory it is failure how? Why they are increasing the production ? why they are upgrading to SU-35 standards? The Su-30 MKI has also given a fillip to the DRDO, which has designed and developed the aircraft’s electronic countermeasures suite, including the radar warning receiver and frequency hopping radios and identify friend or foe system and engine upgrade. Su-30 MKIs are being upgrade to the ‘Super Sukhoi’, which has features similar to a fifth generation aircraft.

@pranaypurohit7855 4 жыл бұрын

@@balbhattfromthirdofsevenof7496 chup be chutiye

@AnkitSingh-vk3hx 4 жыл бұрын

@@pranaypurohit7855 abe tu chup

@docanudeep8132 4 жыл бұрын

Such an eye catching video

@ShankarMel 2 жыл бұрын

I have a Google phone and my wife has an Apple. Neither of us can operate another's phone. So differences in technology are difficult to assimilate and this in a complicated aircraft needs a lot of assimilation and would still be difficult for persons educated earlier and this needs youngsters who are always working with the latest gadgets.

@sh2939 4 жыл бұрын

Very informative

@Electronics61 4 жыл бұрын

Excellent video

@risingsun9064 3 жыл бұрын

Brilliant talk!

@shambobanerjee7738 4 жыл бұрын

Excellent explanation.

@ravichandel8690 4 жыл бұрын

weapons deal mein kya airforce chief ko ya defence minister aur secretary ko comission milta hai

@sandipanbhattacharya8269 4 жыл бұрын

Well explained

@BharatSecurityWatch 4 жыл бұрын

Yaar, Q&A bhi add karte?? Nice explanation as ever by Abhijith.

@dr.hershchadha8995 2 жыл бұрын

Very good

@nimishagandhi8327 4 жыл бұрын

Srijan talks are great.

@muraleedharanp.v6767 4 жыл бұрын

A different, cutting the clutter discourse.Thank you sir for the debate

@darshandave1811 4 жыл бұрын

Very finely explained and raised valid points. But before training and skill development in armed forces we must change recruitment process of armed forces.

@inconsequentialcommonerspe977 4 жыл бұрын

CNC happens after the trials, even commercial bid is opened later than the TEC and is the mandate of TMAS, LS, NS

@hillolbharadwaj2310 4 жыл бұрын

Informative but sir I differ with you in the following 1. Rafael would be able to drop a nuclear bomb in Beijing crossing 3000 km without getting undetected & unchallenged seems absurd. 2. It is not true western war technology is the best because then Americans would have won all wars. Saudis are learning it the hard way. We have won 4 wars using Russian weapons. But if you order the wrong item from the catalog then what can one say. 3. I didn't like the way you questioned the ability of our pilots. They have been putting their lives at risk in 44 years old fighters against 4th generation planes. They deserve some gratitude.

@happyvelly3066 3 жыл бұрын

Truth is bitter..very informative video

@regnauldmortimer4952 2 жыл бұрын

Great guy...very informative

@RajeshKumar-ll5jb 2 жыл бұрын

Great,abhijitji

@rajeshsennik7376 4 жыл бұрын

I love the focus on the human

@thakurvk 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for telling truth.

@inconsequentialcommonerspe977 2 жыл бұрын

I have been GSO1(procurement) in the army headquarters and I agree with abhijit

@parshugyan1586 4 жыл бұрын

Sir please tell us about kill switch technology

@aatmakeawaaz6404 4 жыл бұрын

Abhi when u talk of people and equipment a classic case is the Indian Nuclear submarine debacle few months back. I think the next talk of your should be on that horrible incident !

@chinchinchu7604 4 жыл бұрын

This man is brilliant

@GTR-93 4 жыл бұрын

VERY TRUE IF WE READ OUR INDIAN CONSTITUTION ITS VERY TOUGH ENGLISH EVEN A CAMBRIDGE GRADUATE WILL FIND IT TOUGH TO UNDERSTAND. READ AMERICAN CONSTITUTION ITS VERY SIMPLE EVEN A 10TH CLASS PASS WILL UNDERSTAND IT

@minku1712 4 жыл бұрын

100% agreed.

@gabbarrf1745 4 жыл бұрын

Where is the q and a of this episode?

@pransharma2448 4 жыл бұрын

where is the talk after 36:18 compatibility of Russian weapons on french

@malangi31 3 жыл бұрын

I like this guy's honesty and impartiality, Respect from Pakistan

@avghanekar123 4 жыл бұрын

I don't think Su 30MKI is as bad as it's portrayed in this vdo. Su 30 mki is essentially air superiority fighter and not multi role

@varunv.chadha492 4 жыл бұрын

You are right.

@sabertooth207 4 жыл бұрын

He is not taking about the machine he is taking about the avionics and electronic warfare systems. A fabulous plane like f-22 is garbage without electronics, I will share a small story from mylife. In naval aviation particularly hepters I was related to a company who used to supply a certain liquid as an antifreeze to be used in the computer compartment. In their specifications the Russian put their own standards for the liquid but in their communications they didn't clarified what this standard was. To understand that a meeting was required which was not easy so until the standard was cleared the Hepters couldn't fly. Can you imagine that? That was the level of communication. It took us franatic 7 days to understand what they were referring and it was so stupid but I can't go into specifics but it was like NIST (Google pls). Having said so India prefers to use Israeli weapons on Russian aircraft which is a very big challenge. Why? Because without approval of the OEM you can't even change a washer of a bolt can you believe it? So he is not that wrong having said so. I am pretty confident the Airforce also have experts and they must have thought of something.

@justicewithanish 4 жыл бұрын

Himanshu chandra They do not face any Combat scenerio in the middle east.All they do is drop bombs.

@aakashs30mki 4 жыл бұрын

@Himanshu chandra I too feel the same. In many of his discussions, he alleged that Russian technology is garbage and we should buy American technology. In one of his interview, i have heard him saying S400 is also garbage. It will not work in case of crisis. He is a knowledgeable person but many a time i have witnessed he has a clear bias towards western technologies. I think IAF is experienced enough to take a right call for itself. What we need is a transparent and fast track system to fill up the procurement gaps and aircraft losses we have suffered in last 20 years. Apart from this, we also need to give emphasis on indigenous production such as Tejas and AMCA to match the 42 sq.number we require to cater to the demand of IAF. It would reduce our dependency on western or Russian manufacturers and would enable us to maintain our superiority over our adversaries. 2 front war is a very possible scenario, and keeping in mind the continuous support that China gives to Pakistan, we have to fasten up all these steps.

@aakashs30mki 4 жыл бұрын

@Himanshu chandra Very well said.

@gautamchandran 4 жыл бұрын

Loved the Pratap Bhanu Mehta thin...LOL

@stupidburp 4 жыл бұрын

I don't agree entirely but he makes some valid points. One point I would make is that it is possible to use equipment to train a force and evolve the way they operate. Of course there are other necesary factors as well such as education and realistic analysis. For the IAF the Rafale remains the best choice in my opinion, and many more should be acquired despite the cost. Alternatives would be in the same price range for those with close capabilities or only much cheaper if they have much less capabilities. If sufficient total required force numbers cannot be maintained within budget limits, then some used Mirage 2000 could also be acquired at bargain prices. In regards to the human aspect, better training is crucial and there is a choice at hand that will determine the direction of that training. Sitara has been chosen to replace Kiran for training aircraft despite the fact that Sitara has undesireable handling characteristics. HAL was involved in the design of another trainer, the Advanced Hawk, as part of a 50/50 joint venture with BAE. Advanced Hawk is vastly more capable than Sitara and could take the place of Hawk 132 at the late stages of training. Hawk 132 could then be shifted down to replace Kiran at the early stages instead of Sitara. But there has been resistance to Advanced Hawk on the basis that it is only half Indian in design, being based on the Hawk. Either aircraft would be built in India on the same production lines, who designed it and how much is not important. But I suspect that Sitara will get built and Advanced Hawk won't get built because decisions are not based on holistic view of force capabilities but instead on swapping in platforms under very restrictive conditions with design source being more important than technical merit. That itself is a symptom of the human capital problem.

@dibyaranjannayak9546 3 жыл бұрын

Where all these information come from ....great our defence minister also not know such information's. Great bro you are the live witness how much inch the RoF was .......🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 Jai hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

@harihara1151 3 жыл бұрын

Hope the authorities see the Clarity and precision in your exposition

@Akshaya101 3 жыл бұрын

Great man...

@abhinavirpm 4 жыл бұрын

मजा आ गया अभिजीत भाई को सुन कर।

@techqube8205 4 жыл бұрын

I have worked for Dassault , it is so comical to listen to some of this crap 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@34kaushik 4 жыл бұрын

Could you give more rational info pls?

@hydacanal 3 жыл бұрын

Answer him.

@calvinpalanna2778 3 жыл бұрын

@@34kaushik you'll believe him😂😂😂?

@elimccain1728 3 жыл бұрын

It's for indian audience consumption. So leave it.

@kunalbidla368 4 жыл бұрын

*Baseless arguement* Mirage 2000 was not selected because india was developing lca Tejas aircraft at that point and it has similar characteristics as a Mirage 2000 so there was no point having two different types of aircraft for similar role

@gringologie9302 4 жыл бұрын

The point is that in Dassault contract, they accept to help India developing their industry. No mirage 2000, no help. So India air industry lost 10years maybe more. French ingineers are helping India again since rafale contract signed. Your future plane will no be a big failure (because that's possible in this industry. France made fail by the past. USA did big fail with a lot of money)

@gabbarrf1745 4 жыл бұрын

Brutally honest.

@rohitb3 4 жыл бұрын

Great analysis , but this gentleman is clearly training to underpay the Su-30MKI. It has its shortfall, but overall its a great plane. another point : India training standards are among the best in the world, which is proven in past wars and multinational exercises. So, there's no question about our men being among the best. Also let me look at this at a more macro level : Rafale was not required at all if the IAF would have supported the HAL Tejas. Tejas took flight in 2001 and should have been inducted in 2012. However the IAF, being greedy for bribes, delayed it by adding more requirements and pushed the MMRCAC(Rafale) If that wasnt the case, IAF should have had over 100 Tejas by now, effectively retiring the Mig 21s by 2020.

@riffraff8020 4 жыл бұрын

BFRILLIANT DELIVERY OF SPEECH

@bhavin105 4 жыл бұрын

0:30 Wow, Abhijit decides how many pilots will be upgrading to Rafael. People are so simple, you can easily intimidate them with vocabulary and information.

@sunnybarua6028 4 жыл бұрын

Context is a gift you're yet to be blessed with.....!!

@bhavin105 4 жыл бұрын

@@sunnybarua6028 Absolute BS. He is talking on behalf of IAF and you are talking about context. Do you even know the meaning of 'context'?

@sunnybarua6028 4 жыл бұрын

@@bhavin105 man you weren't kidding, people are simple, vocabulary can be intimidating, calm your Tits......!!

@Abhishekaditya91 4 жыл бұрын

God. Too much of insight.

@a753951852 4 жыл бұрын

What abhijit pointed out about defense procurement policy is very true.. Its a policy not a law.. What he talked about su 30mki is not true.. It was true for su30 mk but its not true for mki, as we have our own avionics and processors on it.. We do have nuclear capability for su 30mki now.. (it still is work in progress as we have to develop the ecosystems for the development and deployment, but it is operational to a fairly comfortable level ).. Rafale is a one stop equipment, it requires no development and can be deployed immediately for training and flight hours.. What abhijit said about the drdo is not absolutely correct, drdo is laggy and boggy but it's not worth less, it was in the mid 90's when we were conducting permanent base operations on siachen and drdo was fairly clueless as abhijit pointed out, but that drastically evolved from 2000 onwards where we are actually ahead of all 5 permanent members of security Council as far as directed energy weapons are concerned and the research behind it, even Americans particle weapons are not miniaturized to the extent of deployment requirements, but drdo has managed to do it.. All in all, this mess has a lot than what meets the eye.. Nda government should reign in the civil service that's more concerned with protecting their noses than to do the job..