Londoniyyah - Part 10 - Proofs of God's Existence / 2

Londoniyyah - Part 10 - Proofs of God's Existence / 2 | Mohammed Hijab

Рет қаралды 26,353

2 жыл бұрын

Londoniyyah - Part 9 - Proofs of God's Existence / 2 | Mohammed Hijab
To be updated about our content please subscribe and open the notifications.
----
BOOK A LIGHTHOUSE MENTOR
Are you or someone you know doubting Islam? Do you find yourself struggling to find answers? Do you have a hard time speaking to someone about Islam? Are you considering Islam but are unsure about certain concepts? Are you an activist, Imam or community leader who is unsure about how to handle questions related to science, philosophy, the Islamic moral code, etc.?
You are not alone. Over the course of the last decade or more there has been a rapid proliferation of content online and in academic institutions that has eroded the faith of some people.
Seeing the rise of this phenomenon , Sapience Institute is introducing a One to One mentoring service called LIGHTHOUSE.
BOOK A MENTOR HERE: sapienceinstitute.org/lightho...
VISIT our website for articles in English, Spanish and Turkish; mentoring service, learning platform and for speaker requests: sapienceinstitute.org/

Пікірлер: 153

@asadullahsaaid3794 2 жыл бұрын

*Timestamps:* 0:00 - Introduction 0:11 - Topic of the video 0:51 - Proposition of the Contingency Argument 2:24 - Contentions to the Argument 3:09 - Reply to the contention 4:04 - Proof 1 5:05 - Composition Fallacy & using multiple arguments 11:11 - Proof 2 15:14 - Proof 3 18:39 - Proof 4 21:07 - Proof 5 24:44 - How do you arrive at the 1st Premise in Proof 1 26:08 - Proving the universe began to exist 27:27 - Argument 1 for Oneness of Necessary Existence 30:25 - Argument 2 for Oneness 38:52 - Argument 3 for Oneness 45:03 - Closing Statements SUBHANALLAH ❤️🤍❤️ _May Allah ﷻ bless and reward you for your efforts._

@salmi_azrinparentsonly863 Жыл бұрын

MashaAllah, great lecture. I can conclude that these are easy concepts which we unfortunately have to explain in such complexity. - If there are two gods than one will dominate each other (Quran 23:91) - Since everything needs space and time, who is maintaining space and time? - Contingency argument simplified

@uzairwaheed330 2 жыл бұрын

Bro’s our here dropping complex philosophy whilst drinking a Capri sun 😂

@Purestplace 2 жыл бұрын

Did you understand anything he said.

@RealVerses 2 жыл бұрын

With the paper straws

@alenizi07 2 жыл бұрын

Complex?

@zakikhera9069 2 жыл бұрын

Jazakallah to brother Hijab for providing us such high quality and informative lectures for free

@Kihalchal786 2 жыл бұрын

5 - 1 = 4 ?????🤔

@Avraham.Eisenberg 2 жыл бұрын

That's why we people that are able to need to give sapiens institution money. We give what we can, because this kind of information is very VERY important tool to use against todays faulty ideologies. I may be free information but the costs to maintain this is expensive. Nothing is free we need to remember that. Imagine if Ali dawah and Hijab could do this full time without working? And the other people in their circle like Saboor and the Jichan the Greek guy and all other brothers that I don't know the name of

@gegeeh.a8328 2 жыл бұрын

You have no idea. You can’t fathom the good you’re doing brother. It may not seem like it now, but Wallah you’re doing work that will be passed down for generation educating and empowering the muslim generations.❤️. A big and warm thanks to everyone at sapience!

@hashimmohammed1794 2 жыл бұрын

You and your everyone else at Sapience Institute are brilliant. May Allah reward you for your efforts.

@zaidm1134 2 жыл бұрын

Please continue these serious. Wallahi I am learning more from these than all your videos. Please continue through many Key Philosophical topics

@MaskSwabe 2 жыл бұрын

Let us all donate as much as we can inshallah to this wonderful cause. We are blessed to have access to such information

@hxyzazolchak 2 жыл бұрын

Amazing! 👏 jazakallah khayran

@CheyenneIvory 2 жыл бұрын

JazaakAllahu Khairan for this gem of a series

@momotaha 2 жыл бұрын

baraka'allah fik br hijab blessing us with another lecture

@ChildofGod98765 2 жыл бұрын

I’m keeping my faith even more because my heart aches. I know God loves me and will provide. Please pray for me. Prayers are all I need! My sons father died three years ago so I am a single mother. I’m not complaining but it’s not easy. I have no family nor friends. I’m struggling to provide for my boys since losing my job for declining the vaccine. My health is poor hence why I declined, Lupus, stents in heart. Im on a bunch of medications. Please keep me in your prayers. Both of my sons are autistic so they tend to be a little more challenging for me. I have been made fun of and laughed at over my situation and called horrible names. I’ve had youtubers call my landlord and harass her making her want to kick me and my children out. Not only is that creepy especially because I’m a single women but it’s also out of line. I’m so discouraged. But I’m keeping faith. I know God will provide and carry me through this hard time. I have Faith! Thank you Jesus!

@hashimmohammed1794 2 жыл бұрын

I recommend that you read the Qur’an. It is the final revelation of the God of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus. It will surely give you the security that you seek in this life and will give you salvation in the next. May Allah guide you and give you and your children health and happiness.

@Someone-ct2ck 2 жыл бұрын

You are really a patient person. May Allah make you strong and remind you when he lifts the obstacles from your life.

@kingsentertainment786 2 жыл бұрын

May God make ease for you and guide you to the straight path. May God help you. Ameen.

@shadabkouser2446 2 жыл бұрын

Sister ,keep calm and keep self reflecting and have a desire and voluntary quest for truth....much more props to you keep the faith and look into Islam

@mohammedaffanahmed8832 2 жыл бұрын

You are really in a very painful condition, just ignore all those animals in the form of humans they'll too find themselves in a similar situation Insha Allah then they'll get to know, please keep going things might not change for a long time but eventually it will insha'Allah, please Read Qura'an a few verses daily.

@mouradali8270 2 жыл бұрын

Rational arguments for the proof of God’s existence are covered in the basic Ashari texts & commentaries .. , but there’s a need to represent them to a modern context .. I’m glad Mohamed Hijab and Hamza tzortis are reclaiming our heritage from modern Christian theologians .

@brotheraskedaverygoodquest3442 2 жыл бұрын

What heritage ? Abrahamic religion has no association with Islam 😂

@mouradali8270 2 жыл бұрын

@@brotheraskedaverygoodquest3442 I'm talking about the likes of William Lane Craig, Plantinga, and other Modern Christian philosophers, and their use of arguments stemming from the Islamic Tradition.

@axis2312 2 жыл бұрын

I LOVE THIS COURSE SO MUCH

@oggamer2244 2 жыл бұрын

Finally!!! Been itching for this

@Fiorenzina 2 жыл бұрын

Again, another tremendous and striking episode.

@SPeeDKiLL45 2 жыл бұрын

The best thing you can do is to buy Mohammed Hijabs books read them at first, and mark the things you did not understand. Then watch all his videos. You enjoy them 5 times more i swear.

@SPeeDKiLL45 2 жыл бұрын

because he uses the examples he writes about in his book. really cool.

@dr_maniac_321 2 жыл бұрын

Which book? Because his Kalam cosmological book is too difficult to comprehend for me

@habboUdviseren 11 ай бұрын

@@dr_maniac_321I think its ‘The Burhan’

@MuhammadHassan200 Жыл бұрын

Jazak ALLAH brother

@tenteram1 2 жыл бұрын

Jazaakumullaahu khairan, baarakallaahu fiikum.. Brother Hijab and Team.. Anyone from Indonesia here ?

@saymyname1605 2 жыл бұрын

Excellent mashaAllah

@homtanks7259 2 жыл бұрын

Jazakallahu khairan

@strictlyyoutube6881 2 жыл бұрын

Ma Sha Allah epic!

@aali8874 2 жыл бұрын

Wa'alaikum assalaam wa rehmatu'LLAHI wa barakatuh

@eldinbechar 2 жыл бұрын

Awsome

@winkfish 2 жыл бұрын

Would love to have a pdf at least of the Mandhooma/rhyme of Londoniyyah...

@freeman7983 2 жыл бұрын

Masha ALLAH

@karimdaghmash7853 2 жыл бұрын

Wa alaykum asalam wa rahmatulahi wa barakatu

@essa200911 2 жыл бұрын

ما شاء الله Mashallah

@redleaves4945 2 жыл бұрын

Much appreciated

@jmiah75 2 жыл бұрын

Great top matches the background and look of the room !

@imtiazahmedkhan7996 Жыл бұрын

The best take is that we are prisoners of language ان هي الا اسماء سميتموهاانتم و اباءكم ما انزل الله بها من سلطن language is an immense collection of signifiers bringing about non-identity. The produced object is thought materialised and it retroactively constitute the imaginary character of the subject. Hence when Quran says يوم يكشف عن ساق it involves a constitutive inadequacy, misrepresentation of the inner in the outer, which should inaugurate alienated subjectivity that would do more than just interpret the world

@umarmalik881 2 жыл бұрын

Great evidence hijab

@kingsentertainment786 2 жыл бұрын

first❤

@mozzjonas9292 2 жыл бұрын

Salam alai’kul Can someone give me a very easy to understand analogy of the contingency arguments? Thanks

@user-qf2jv2yp6v 2 жыл бұрын

We need the poem pdf

@imaduddinsayeed7377 2 ай бұрын

I cant get the part-whole differentiation thing. If we say that part is a piece then how can we detach something from the universe? Or on a scientific basis, someone might argue that it can only change forms as energy is not created or destroyed?

@udoyshahriar5784 Жыл бұрын

❤

@CherifRahal 2 ай бұрын

Where can I find the slides ?

@TehreemAyesha 2 жыл бұрын

@ 29:26 Why does the differentiating factor of God2 make Him contingent?

@markorbit4752 2 жыл бұрын

Simplistic answers for simplistic minds

@khaledchatah3425 2 жыл бұрын

39:29 I think i have a much stronger argument: Suppose that we have ultimate will 1 and ultimate will 2 call it uw1 and uw2 respectively we have 2 cases: 1) uw1#uw2 (# means different) 2)uw1=uw2 (= means exact same) Suppose 2) then we are already done. Since there cannot be any differentiating factor. And uw1=uw2 that the 2 ultimate entities are actually the same entity therefore there is really 1 ultimate entity. I can give an example of the absurdity of the negation of my statement: Negating my statement is very much saying that rock is actually 2 rocks but they have the exact same properties. Which is absurd. now suppose 1) That this means that whatever uw1 willed will happen and whatever uw2 willed will happen. a) If the thing they willed is about the same contingent existence then that contingent existence is itself and not itself ( for example uw1 willed the rock to be solid and uw2 willed the rock to be liquid than the rock is solid and liquid which makes it a contradiction) b) if the thing they willed are about different contingent existence aka they "work" synchronised. Then: b-I)uw1 did not will a thing to happen therefore it wont happen that uw2 willed it to happen so it will happen therefore that thing that uw2 willed is in both existence and in unexistence which is a contradiction b-II) uw1 and uw2 agreed that the respective thing unwilled by the corresponding ultimate will, will be existing by the will of the other corresponding ultimate will So basically they willed what they didn't will to happen which is a contradiction. I hope someone understands what i said.

@quran_translations_ 2 жыл бұрын

Probably the best hadith you ever hear 🤯 Aws bin Aws narrated: Allah's Messenger said to me: "Whoever performs Ghusl on Friday, and bathes completely, and goes early, arriving early, gets close and listens and is silent, there will be for him in every step he take the reward of a year of fasting and standing (in prayer). At-Tirmidhi (496) Sahih hadith

@mukhammadrizoabduganiev7106 10 ай бұрын

May Allah bless Mohammed Hijab. I have one question you said in the previous video that Allah’s knowledge and will are necessary (meaning everything is done by these necessary attributes cannot be other way around) the universe is made by Allah with these attributes. But in the proof 2 you said anything can be rearranged is contingent (depent) things. Question, if Allah made the universe with His necessary attributes, so universe could not have been in another way. Does it contradict the proof 2 you provide?

@Ahle.haq0 8 ай бұрын

Yes the universe could not have been in another way shape or form but that is because we are referencing God in our belief. The universe still remains contingent as it is rationally rearrangeable but out of the trillions of possible combinations God chose this specific ones based on his absolute knowledge and wisdom. The atheist cannot say that the universe couldn't have been in another way as he does not have a necessary being to reference but we do

@bubbleteakun 2 жыл бұрын

Selam Alaykum brother. Why can't a necessary existence be any other way?

@beehivepattern5695 2 жыл бұрын

is that AlI dawah?

@endzeitx Жыл бұрын

can the contigent existences depend upon each other to exist without necessary existence? For example, a universe depend upon another universe in a multiverse to exist?

@MuhammadHassan200 Жыл бұрын

No .

@Ahle.haq0 8 ай бұрын

No, because you would run into the problem of infinite regress as imam al ghazli put it in his book the incoherence of the philosophers in chapter one

@endzeitx 8 ай бұрын

@Naveed-fi7vj if there's 3 universe, A depends on B, B depends on C, and C depends on A. What's the counter argument when someone says, all 3 of them have existed forever?

@Ahle.haq0 8 ай бұрын

@@endzeitxthat is a logical impossibility.

@Ahle.haq0 8 ай бұрын

@@endzeitxRefutation: In this chain of dependencies you have mentioned three. Now there is no logical reason to believe that there cannot be more than or less than three dependencies. Which is why even in this case we need a reference to a necessary being which is God himself. It's just like asking why the universe is the way it is. As it could have been in any other way possible which makes it a logical necessity to believe in a necessary being

@HammadKhan-wu3cx 2 жыл бұрын

I do have. Query that arguments you are making for universe that it is contingent why can't you say same argument for God. Because technically no can one say with full audacity that god is made of peices or not cause we don't know that much about God.

@a.m.3744 2 жыл бұрын

16:40 we are not talking about the ladies here hahaha

@TheGolfCommunity1 2 жыл бұрын

The fact that you couldn’t give an example of what of what is necessary shows that God Is the only necessary being

@markorbit4752 2 жыл бұрын

If there is a necessary being, it is not Allah

@Ersilay 2 жыл бұрын

@@markorbit4752 A necessary being can't be anything but Allah. That's the whole gimmick you do not understand. Because a necessary being has certain attributes we can deduce rationally, Ever-Lasting, Omnipotence, Omniscience, First, One and Only etc ... and those are exactly the attributes of the God we worship. You wanna call it Allah as He call Himself in his revelation, good. Wanna call him God, Dieu, Gott, Elohim, Allaha, YHWH, the concept remains the same. Unfortunately for our christian friends, the trinitarian belief is in direct confrontation to rational thinking, hence why they disagree with using the word Allah. If you go to unitarian arabophone christians, they have no qualms using this nomination.

@markorbit4752 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ersilay all the attributes/ adjectives you are using are just an attempt by you to define this concept of a necessary being and give it the attributes which you think are logical..do you understand what I am saying?

@Ersilay 2 жыл бұрын

@@markorbit4752 No. Because you are assuming the logical path we take to rationaly deduce the existence of God is us presuposing a God with certain qualities and inducing a path from that perspective. If you saw the video we're currently commenting on, it's the opposite. If Mohammed Hijab was doing what you're saying, we would have given all 99 names/attributes of God and tried to rationalise it, but he didn't, and we can't.

@Ersilay 2 жыл бұрын

@@markorbit4752 What you're missing I believe is understanding of the meaning of necessary. Necessary is a quality which entails certain attributes, and other attributes can be deduced from those attributes as derivative reasoning. Necessary = unchanging. If something was changing, it wouldn't be necessary as it would entail what depends upon it doesn't require it in its entirety to be necessary. If it's unchanging, then it must be eternal, pre- and post-existing. Because otherwise the state of such entity would have changed, from non-existent to existent or other various ways. Since such entity was always existing, everything that happens have a relation to it (i.e. first cause). It must thus be endowed with omnipotence as It brings rise to all phenomenas. Likewise, it must be Omniscient because every phenomena rose from him in the first place, and all knowledge must come from It. It can only be One, because otherwise it would contradict the last 2 attributes, i.e. over all things capable and over all things knowledgeable. If there were two Omnipotent, what if one decided for the other to cease to exist and the other wanted to remain existing? It would be a paradox with no answer. It must have a will to bring rise to phenomenas, otherwise no matter how many attributes this entity has, it will never act upon them, never bringing rise to anything, contradicting the current reality. Tell me where I superimposed islamic beliefs? I am merely deducing things rationally. If I was, I'd be arguing for a Just entity, or a loving one, but I can't. I can only understand this aspect through the Entity itself, I can not rationally deduce it. But the basics of the Entity are already laid down, and since there can only be One, once such Entity appear, we as humans can identify easily if It is the necessary being or not by applying what we can rationally deduce. If the boxes are ticked, then everything coming from such Entity must be True because It could very well not communicate at all. If It communicate in the first place, it can not be for It's own sake because It only is necessary, thus unchangeable and does not require depending existences to Be, change, cease to exist to remain the same. We can go on and on, and this from an axiomatic level, which is purely deductible and rational. Now tell me again, where exactly is the problem in my reasoning?

@mohammedaffanahmed8832 2 жыл бұрын

I don't understand you I don't know if this is because I am not at your level or I don't know what but I don't seem to understand you.

@clearlyclearor 2 жыл бұрын

To understand u need to have a bit background on certain stuff. Ull get there dw

@briendoyle4680 2 жыл бұрын

@@clearlyclearor hahaha

@briendoyle4680 2 жыл бұрын

or ahahah....

@Ersilay 2 жыл бұрын

It's fine, it's not high school level philosophy. If you wanna get it more easily, I invite you to watch the episode 1 by 1 of Londonniya, he goes from the basics to those kind of arguments. It's quite the amazing job that brother Hijab is doing, granted you can understand everything.

@badbritish2061 2 жыл бұрын

Because it’s not Islam it’s just chit chat…only the ignorant think it’s DAWAH…SubhaanAllaah