Ek taraf Akash Chopra tha...vo sustball khel raha tha😂😂😂

Yes bro...England feel that they invented this new bazball kind...but fact is that veeru owned bazball as soon as he debuted to test cricket...very underrated test cricketer, but my favourite player

​@@vijaykumaralic I use to watch cricket for him kya din se vo subhe School Jane se phle sehwag ki batting fir school Mai uska run track krna

flat wicket 😂

Except it wasn't even the best in this match

Having the top score doesn't necessarily make it the best performance in the match. Yes, Ricky Ponting scored a double century in their first innings, but it took him almost 450 balls. Therefore, some performances are deemed better despite not having the highest scores.

The best

@@wanderer-2006 so who was awarded Man of the Match is this test, for the 'best performance in the match'?

​@@Detective313"Undoubtedly, Man of the Match was Ricky Ponting , who amassed 706 runs in the series, emerging as the highest run-scorer. Rahul Dravid, with 619 runs, held the distinction for India. Interestingly, though Ponting outshone with the most runs, it was Rahul who was adjudged the Man of the Series. If the same criterion applied as in the Boxing Day Test for selecting the best player, Ponting, being the top run-scorer, should have been the recipient. The rationale behind Rahul receiving the honor remains a curious aspect."

Virender you boomer uncle. Get your spellings right

Yes but after viv richards

A small correction. Sehwag isn't one of the best but the best Indian opener of all times.

Underrated by what standards mate? He's rated pretty high and in proportion to his achievements. Don't throw around random words

@@SuperFastbowler I remember in 2010-11 series against SA, where Steyn and co destroyed indian batting line up.. However there was a lot of criticism for sehwag particularly that he isn't the good test player, he just throws kitchen sink at everything... But overall his impact and stats looks pretty good to me

@@avatharamveeraraghavan3001 Thats what i wrote... Gavaskar, navjot singh, Rohit, Gambhir, Murali Vijay (he was good against pace and spin in SENA) But only you can name a few in world cricket, who are better than him at the top... If i had to pick opening i'd def go with sehwag and Gavaskar

Underrated ? you are funny

not counter attacking, his test strike rate is 83,so basically played always that way

😂

@@techlover2712 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

@@Scenicescaped Enna Sirippu unaku

See ball hit ball

Yuvraj was average in tests.

Same here

🔥🔥🔥🔥

😊

Warner is also good….

Sunil Gavaskar ,only test opener with 10,500 runs at 51 average.

As an opener his average is 50+. And strike rate 80+. No one comes close.

That too with an average of 50 in 104 test matches. It’s absolutely insane.

​@@sahilmohan7983absolutely right 👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

Odi strike rate 104,t20 strike rate 145+

Go and see strike rate of viv Richard and gregg Chappel

Would have been Rohit Sharma if he would have backed like Sehwag who despite having a string of poor performances was continuously backed by Ganguly , Rohit Sharma is unlucky to play in the captaincy of Dhoni and Kohli , he would have been a different player if he would have got someone like Ganguly

❤

There was no McGrath and Shane warne.

@@intelligentdude7108 true. India did well in the series because of that, I always thought. But, it is about this match in particular, which would have won India the series, had the other players backed Sehwag's super knock on day 1

Nobody in India appreciates the opponents. No sportsmanship. Cricket is governed by most incompetent people. Epitome of NEPOTISM. just hate politics

Thanks to fascist BJPee

@@mayurkanth6987 cope.

Ah yes. The mighty attack of Brad Williams, Nathan Bracken, Bret Lee and Stuart McGill was absolutely terrifying wasn’t it.

Lee is a legend and Bracken was lethal​@@nooneknows19

@@SATYAMKUMAR-fo8qn Not in test cricket boss. Both were absolute guns in ODI cricket. Lee was very inconsistent in tests. He'd have days where he would be 5/20 and days where he'd be 0/100. And Bracken averaged 43 in 5 tests. He was not good at test cricket. None of them were as good as McGrath or peak Gillespe. And none of them are as good as Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins in test cricket.

Star, Cummins, Hazelwood and Lyon would bully him.

❤

Scoring fast went useless.

Any format he was best

Always a beast

But they never dominated this series.

@@rishabhsingh7826 yup true they under performed heavily

@@Gd-jq6mz they didn't underperformed but Indian team performed on par with them that's why the end result was 1-1

@@rishabhsingh7826 they heavily under performed that's literally the greatest team ever the only way they don't win is when they under perform