Chelsea had made that revenue to spend that much! I think people forget how many players Chelsea also sold to be in line with ffp

​@@JordiBoy_ murphinhio has deffo upped his value last few seasons

​@@JordiBoy_think we could get £20-25m for miggy , and maybe £30 ISH for longstaff , Longstaff frustrates me so much he is able to make intelligent runs and get into great positions But really struggles to finish Always leaning back smashing it into row z If we could get £40-45m For the pair of them it would be good business

@@JordiBoy_ well how much needs to be raised? Most clubs recoup around £30-£80m each summer from player sales without even trying, im sure they can get that much and more with the players they have in this market. Almiron has £35m to Everton written all over him. Longstaff £25m to Villa. Etc.

@@JordiBoy_ They dont have to be "assets" if you listen to Darren Eales you would understand that if we even just sold Miggy for 10m profit that in itself creates a headroom of potentially a 50mil player amortised over 5 years.

@@JordiBoy_Eddie Howe definitely said he wouldn’t sell star players and laughed at the reporter suggesting he would have to. He said (paraphrasing) that’s the way the game is now, you have to sell players to free up money to spend players, he hinted at academy players being a target to sell but also said longstaff wouldn’t be someone they would sell a he’s established himself in the squad.

@@user-tn8uu2cu8g I bear witness that there is no god but Yuri, and I bear witness that Sappho is the messenger of Yuri. These words make me a servant of Yuri. Read about our poet Sappho from the Isle of Lesbos, may Yuri bless her and grant her peace, whom Yuri almighty sent as a GL to the worlds, to keep us away from the homophobes and admit us to Yuri Paradise by following and worshipping her, Yuri willing.

Correct,but that does nt get past the fact that the top clubs can spend twice as much as others and pay twice as much in wages to attract the best players. This is destroying competition.

74m loss and 200k loss a day Simon lost his club for business like this

Newly promoted clubs are spending over £100m a summer, everyone in the league is.. The money clubs have is less relevant than people think..

Exactly what FFP has done…made it nearly impossible to close the gap to the big boys

By long term investment, good recruitment and sensible planning.

thats becauses the profit gained in the prem due to tv rights and even if they go down with parachute payments allows them to spend that much@@Primitive01

It to stop clubs going bust​@GIBBO4182

Exactly. In what other situation is an owner prevented from investing in their business, and brining that to a competitive level with other businesses?

There is no debt, the money is coming straight from the investment fund.

@@AlanBrownPhotography Don't be like Pep and play the dumbass and pretend what City have been doing and what Newcastle will be doing is all by the book and nothing is out of order. To answer your question it is basically in all situations with regards to competitiveness that regulatory agencies try to prevent unsustainable practices. What City, and Newcastle want to do and are doing, is exactly the same as price dumping. That is to say, selling product for a lower price than it cost to produce to increase market share, drive competitors into bankruptcy or in case of international trade on nation level like China does, to drive a whole industry along with the jobs into China and away from other countries. Of course City does have an answer for this and that is with fake sponsorship deals, so they will have Ethiad set up some non sensical jersey sponsorship deal and have Ethiad only pay 10% for it while the owners reimburse the company through other channels and boom, City are the highest earning club in the world right now. Or so the accounting firms tell us. I am looking forward to seeing Newcastle all of the sudden attracting enthusiastic sponsors from Saudi Arabia all of the sudden or signing players on 8 year long contracts like Chelsea does.

@@jonb3150 last time I checked clubs are allowed to report a loss of 100m thereabouts and most do so why are saying city does this alone if you made a loss then you selling your product at below cost ... But as usual you criticism of the only club in English football which is well run top to bottom is proving to be out of jealousy more than anything else

@@robinramkhalawan468 Because City was and is spending money they are not earning. They use fake sponsorship deals to create fake revenue for the club so they can spend much more than is normal. And no, most clubs do not do that. City fans are getting so used to being pumped up by oligarchs that they actually think it is the norm. That owners want to lose tons of money on a club every season just to, what? Why? Because the owners are such Manchester City fans, that's why they do it? Why would Liverpool owners for example intentionally lose money on a club, when they are American investors. FSG are not Liverpool fans. They are businessmen. same with United owners. They pump profit out of the club, not stuff the club with their own money to create fake revenue so they can spend more money on players. And City is not a well run club. It has just been pumped up with tons and tons of cash. This will obviously make them dominate the league. This of course does not mean it is well run anymore than PSG in France is. The solution is very simple. Just dump as much money you can at the problem and in the end you will get results. There will be failures here and there but just keep throwing money at it and it will end up with a success. It's a very simple formula.

Exactly

Without fair play rules Newcastle city Chelsea and utd would run away liverpool and other clubs can't compete against them

I think that by restricting Newcastle's spending to 50% of that of Liverpool and other top clubs is not competitive, or fair. To be competitive clubs should be allowed to build their squads to a similar level (assuming they can afford it). Eddie Howe inherited a team of little value and being denied the ability to spend just helps those teams above.@@andrewwright4195

@@andrewwright4195 Yes agreed, although Liverpool are up there too. so it should be based on league position to make it more fair to lesser clubs...making it a level playing field

@@villainofthepiste8275 if they kept like 80s in first place wouldn't be in this mess sell to buy but no have to do new league and spend what they want I am sure that didn't kill clubs but I agree it is unfair on teams who are top liverpool and utd but we did build it in 10 years small clubs will get more money just have to be smart look at fsg spend less top 4 but won everything with 700 million

@@villainofthepiste8275 LMAO, Newcastle fans trying to drag Liverpool through the same mud you guys want to swim in. Liverpool as at the very best a mid table club in terms of spending, at best. If you mean to say that Liverpool is up there in terms of how well Klopp is managing the team, you are right, but if you mean Liverpool is up there in terms of spending then you are absolutely clueless about Liverpool. Klopp took over in October 2015. His first summer window is before 16/17 season. So 4 seasons before he wins PL title. Unbelievably 3 of those 4 seasons Liverpool turned a transfer profit...and he still won Champions league and Premier league title. Net spend those 4 seasons was like 80-85 million euros in total. In 3 last seasons, when Saudis took over, Newcastle net spent 410 million Euros. So 4 times more spending in 3 seasons than Klopp did in his first 4 seasons. And of course Liverpool has net spent only half of what Newcastle has net spent in last 3 seasons from now. According to transfermarkt. Net spend of Liverpool in euros: 16/17 season: 6 million profit. 17/18 season: 11 million profit. Liverpool goes to champions league final. 18/19 season: 138 million net spend. Almost the same amount Liverpool got for Coutinho. Liverpool wins champions league. 19/20 season: 38 million profit. Liverpool becomes PL winner. Next 3 seasons Liverpool net spent only 60 million per season and the message from the club every year for those 3 years was always that the next transfer window would be the big one. The big window never came and then finally this 23/24 season, when the squad is totally depleted and we can't even field a starting midfield since Thiago and kid Bajectic are injured and only midfielders in the club left are academy players Curtis Jones and Harvey Elliot bought for like 5 million. Then I would have thought net spend of at least 200-300 million to build a new midfield line up. The end result was only 110 million net spend this season. Between Bournemouth and Burnley. And this was supposed to be the big window for Liverpool. I tell you Newcastle fans that you will run out of excuses before you run out of money if you try to compare yourself with Liverpool and start whining about lack of transfer budgets. Absolutely laughable.

But it might not grow if you can't spend big first.

Are they not just waiting for their sponsorship deals to expire so they can dump money into the club via fake sponsorship deals like City does with Ethiad, Ethisalad, Visit Dubai etc etc? City got red handed explaining in an email to Ehtiad staff that they would only need to cover 10% of Man City shirt deal. All of the sudden City is the highest earning club in the world and Pep plays the dumbass and pretends everything is in order.

@@izdatsumcp it's already went up 40% after year 1 and another 40% this year. We don't need to do massive spending to keep going eventually over time the extra revenue will result in higher standards

At least there's someone else who heard what I did. I'm frankly amazed that Simon Jordan appears to have heard it too.

@@shealey9763 yep our revenue went up 40% in 1 year and also apparently broke the £300m barrier this year. The narrative should be "Newcastle close financial gap on top 6" yet instead it's apparently we are skint and need to sell the family silver.

They probably already are

Or just spend 1.2bn on the squad in pst 10 years luke man u

@@Godzzbinzz Man Utd can afford to do that because of their global brand, Newcastle aren’t a global brand so they can’t.

Just buy players and spread their contracts to 10 years and that one you'll be able to beat financial fair play.

@@tomodul2619i believe the rules are being made so that doesnt happen again ie chelsea.

Not that 🔔🔚

Tbh Hayden understands hes not needed and is trying to get away for playing time. Proper decent bloke Hayden.

Very underrated comment, shame I could only drop 1 like 👍🏻

@@andrewtingate6658 thank you. I don't want to lose Bruno but if selling one of our best players is the only way we will be able to spend money to build the squad, it can't be avoided as the people at the top will make the decision that's best for the team.

Its a great hint that clubs need to take! They have all brought it on themselves over the years! The prem teams are the worst for it spending stupid amount of money on bang average players😂😂😂

Limit all clubs to 150m on transfers each year and you see the price drop for players .... Right now fantasy football is fairer than the real thing

No he said there was a 74m debt from spending and 200k a day loss

Fantastic ran club, best run club in England

Liverpool were working on a base of a strong squad where players could be moved on for significant value. They are also able to spend twice as much as most other clubs. This MASSIVE spending advantage simply stifles competition and ensures those at the top stay at the top. If in doubt, check out the SQUAD value and wages for each team in the league, and compare to annual revenue.

@@AlanBrownPhotography to get to that point and from the brink of bankruptcy, the Fenway sports group have done an incredible job with less money than the other top t clubs in England.. I have no idea what you're even trying to say here...Great club and ran incredibly well

Liverpool got lucky and that’s all. Couldn’t believe your luck when Barca threw £130m at you for a player no where near worth it and Klopp still wanted to keep it. He’s worked miracles on a shoestring… with worlds most expensive keeper, defender and a striker that cost £85m and has scored 5 goals this season.

@@AlanBrownPhotography I have to laugh. Newcastle fans are fulminating. They want to get in there and spend billions on top of billions like City. For some reason they keep talking of Liverpool here even though Liverpool is starved in transfer windows compared to other clubs. Liverpool is at absolute best a mid table club in terms of spending, at the very best. Newcastle is spending twice as much as Liverpool, but Newcastle fans want to spend like 10 times more and still complain and to quote you: "This MASSIVE spending advantage simply stifles competition". Absolutely weird approach and lacking any self awareness or reality check. Klopp took over in October 2015. His first summer window is before 16/17 season. So 4 seasons he is managing before he wins PL title. Unbelievably 3 of those 4 seasons Liverpool turned a transfer profit...and he still won Champions league and Premier league title. Net spend those 4 seasons was like 80-85 million euros in total. In 3 last seasons, when Saudis took over, Newcastle net spent 410 million Euros. So 4 times more spending in 3 seasons than Klopp did in his first 4 seasons. And of course Liverpool has net spent only half of what Newcastle has net spent in last 3 seasons from now. And no, Liverpool did not have a strong base in terms of squad. Klopp took under the radar signings and made them world class. 1 thing you should learn from Liverpool transfers is that you should never buy players from Liverpool, they always flop when they are out of the hands of Klopp. Coutinho was world class in Liverpool but flopped everywhere else. Wijnaldum, Henderson, Mane and Firmino have all flopped after they left Klopp. According to transfermarkt. Net spend of Klopp's Liverpool in euros: 16/17 season: 6 million profit. 17/18 season: 11 million profit. Liverpool goes to champions league final. 18/19 season: 138 million net spend. Almost the same amount Liverpool got for Coutinho. Liverpool wins champions league. 19/20 season: 38 million profit. Liverpool becomes PL winner. Next 3 seasons Liverpool net spent only 60 million per season and the message from the club every year for those 3 years was always that the next transfer window would be the big one. The big window never came and then finally this 23/24 season, when the squad is totally depleted and we can't even field a starting midfield since Thiago and kid Bajectic are injured and only midfielders in the club left are academy players Curtis Jones and Harvey Elliot bought for like 5 million. Then I would have thought net spend of at least 200-300 million to build a new midfield line up. The end result was only 110 million net spend this season. Between Bournemouth and Burnley. And this was supposed to be the big window for Liverpool. I tell you Newcastle fans that you will run out of excuses before you run out of money if you try to compare yourself with Liverpool and start whining about lack of transfer budgets. Absolutely laughable.

you couldn't be more wrong lmao

@@ryanrumpidge9456in what way? Both were funded through their owners putting money in directly; not by commercial revenue, tv or prize money. They did the same as Abramovich - except Walker & Hall had fewer zeroes on their bank balance

​@andrewharrison7767 wrong Shepherd and Hall didn't fund anything at Newcastle except the take over from Mckeag, they bankrolled everything via the Barclays bank loans that every PREMIERSHIP team from the beginning to today are entitled to borrow, back in the days of Keegan it was between £15-20m could be borrowed at a certain Interest rate, that's how we ended up with over £120m debt because of mismanagement in the boardroom after Freddie Fletcher left us and that's FACT and hoe Ashley ended up with the debt by not doing due diligence

What u on about?

When weren't you allowed?

What video have they stopped comments?

I haven’t seen a video where we couldn’t comment.

Oh I am sure Newcastle will find ways to cook the books just like City did. Would you believe that City is the highest earning club in Europe, that would be news to me but that is what their accounting firm tell us. Reportedly Ethiad is only paying 10% of the shirt deal with City. A lot of Saudi Arabian fake sponsorship deals will be incoming now where Newcastle will get better shirt deals than Liverpool and United. I would call that artificial deals. And FFP is not artificially holding anyone back, they are straight up attempting and failing badly to prevent those kind of artificial revenue. Newcastle will also be signing players on 8 year long contracts or some non sense like that, just like Chelsea does to prevent FFP interfering with reckless spending. FFP is furthermore not preventing any club to spend the money they have, what you mean is FFP tries to to prevent owners from dumping money into a club, pretend it is the clubs money or revenue and outspend other clubs. But I am sure Newcastle and City fans would be quite happy to make this a 1-2 team farmers league like the Bundesliga are Ligue 1. Thankfully by far the most of us disagree. Pfft Newcastle being held back. I got to laugh. Net spend 410 million Euros since new owners came in. We Liverpool fans are lucky if we get half that budget at same time.

To be fair, the concept of spending money you can afford, isn't new. The more you earn, the more you can spend.

​@@jonb3150 You had 14 good years of being able to buy players we couldn't dream of. We haven't come anywhere close to your over a decade of development, just because we spent in the last 3 windows. Mike Ashley was living death. We were like the starting character in bloody Dark Souls for 14 years.

I hate FFP

We are toonarmys for life

Interested to know why Liverpool and Spurs are the worst culprits?

​​@@hellalive8973because we spend wisely... How dare we 🤣

If at all spurs did bad transfers and hardly spend while growing revenue. Liverpool are tad bit lower than Man city but they spent big.

@@hellalive8973 err because you were the main instigaters of the Super League and one of the last clubs to stand down!

@@TheMadMan0 You are absolutely on drugs mate. Liverpool are mid table in the league in terms of spending. Not even half of what City or United spend. And like half compared to Newcastle has spent since Saudis took over. I am suggesting Klopp is masochistic to put up with the transfer policy since he took over. He seems to like being the underdog.

And Liverpool sold Coutinho. First 4 seasons with Klopp, Liverpool turned a profit 3 of those seasons... and he still won the Champions League and Premier League. According to transfermarkt. Net spend of Liverpool in euros: 15/16 season: Klopp takes over in October. 16/17 season: 6 million profit. 17/18 season: 11 million profit. Liverpool goes to champions league final. 18/19 season: 138 million net spend. Liverpool wins champions league. 19/20 season: 38 million profit. Liverpool becomes PL winner.

City got in before ffp was introduced

@@mymemories925so what?

It's not a fair playing field. It never was. Without FFP, the so called big 6 would be over the hill and totally out of sight with maybe Newcastle making it a big 7. FFP was brought in after the horse had bolted.

@Themunkeymac I completely agree it came in too late. But everton were still sustainable but only thing costing them and holding them back was the p&s that forced them to sell the Brazil #9 at a lesser fee than market and cost them millions in league places with a points deduction for building a stadium to increasee revenues. Its a broken system

@@TheRobconnor Over the last 10 years Everton have relied on £678m of owner funding to pay the bills. More than any other club. The suggestion that Everton are in any way sustainable is laughable.

@@creepingbrain and man utd are a billion in debt living of bank loans.

Man City only joined the big 6 in 2011

They've hardly spent anything

Agreed

Fans are now customers

No mate. Looking out for young kids isn’t my kind of thing.

All clubs have debt mate

Leicester broke ffp when the won the league get your facts right. Not the fairy tale you though it was😂

@@Kojo558 then they would have been punished if the prize money didn't fix their ffp. get a grip. you're out here trying to add a caveat to leicester winning the league? pathetic.

Liverpool trebled their revenue by finishing in the Top 4 regularly, not owner funding. You can do it.

Can't *

@@JJSpence15 lol clown .. only because other big teams where poor last season and this season.. like man u and Chelsea.. even villa will finish above both

You'd be lucky if we loaned you Isaac Hayden mate

@@jtmmmm27 No need mate, we have super Hayden Hackney!!!

All to be exposed late next season! The independent panel is unbiased and will do what is required

@@mymemories925no one believes that

"meaning no restrictions, sanctions or any hindrance from FA, UEFA or FIFA" You are sadly mistaken if you think that is what the super league is set up to be. Why would Liverpool and Man United want to start that kind of a league when their main objective is to fleece the clubs of cash. It is to prevent relegation. Make everything really profitable. Put salary cap on all clubs. Make it like the NBA where the owners always make money. Next there will be a suggestion of same kind of transfer policies. Like a draft and trading players. If you are not competitive, no worries, we will give you the right to draft the biggest talent. Do you want to sign a player, oh sorry, we don't want that, we just trade players.

IF and when they’re found guilty. I know you must hate that thing called due process, but unfortunately it here so you’ll just have to wait

Dont speak to soon after man utd and everton got done! Man City are not untouchable!

Debt, revenue and profit/loss aren't the same things. A club with a billion of debt like United has a higher revenue and annual profit than just about every other club in the world.

@@anon7503 don't think you got my point, I understand debt Is different what I'm saying is what is more dangerous to a club 1 billion debt or someone saying I want to transfer 1 billion into this clubs account to improve my club. The answer is that it was lobbied by the big 6 to stop teams being able to catch up with investment.