Sony A7 IV vs Fujifilm X-H2 - Full Frame vs Features [ A7IV vs XH2 ]

Рет қаралды 96,650

Күн бұрын

Sony A7 IV vs Fujifilm X-H2 - Full Frame vs Features [ A7IV vs XH2 ]
Sony A7 IV - amzn.to/3vyqXPK
Fujifilm X-H2 - amzn.to/3t9KFAW
Pergear 512GB CFexpress B Card - amzn.to/3Oksrq4
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN - amzn.to/2Q4AUAm
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II - amzn.to/3xTQDYz
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 - amzn.to/3ELjG2b
Viltrox AF 13mm F1.4 XF - amzn.to/37AnIiE
Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR - amzn.to/3XkzNOs
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR - amzn.to/2GJsJYU
Nitecore USN4 Pro - amzn.to/2kKhogP
Nitecore FX3 Dual Charger - amzn.to/3Onug5M
More videos:
Fujifilm X-H2S Review - Hybrid APS-C Flagship [ Fuji XH2S ]
bit.ly/FujiX-H2S
Sony A7IV vs Fujifilm X-H2S - Hybrid Comparison [ A7IV vs XH2S ]
bit.ly/A7IVvsX-H2S
30 Great Accessories for Sony A7IV
bit.ly/A7IVaccessories
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II Review w/ Sony A7R IV
bit.ly/SonyFE24-70mmF28MGII
Sony A7IV vs Sony A7R IV A - Hybrid vs High-res Special
bit.ly/A7IVvsA7RIV
Follow me on Instagram: / william_svrcek
Please note that if you use the affiliate links above to purchase products, I will get a small commission (1-6% of the price). It helps with the funding the production on this channel, but it won't cost you any extra money.
0:00 Intro
0:35 Build quality, physical aspects
1:39 Sensor, Resolution, ISO, DR
4:47 Continuous shooting, CFexpress slot
6:03 Autofocus
8:48 Video
12:02 IBIS & Stabilization
13:10 Handling, UI
14:47 Display & EVF
15:33 Battery life
17:30 Summary

Пікірлер: 190

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

*30 Great Accessories for Sony A7IV* - bit.ly/A7IVaccessories *Fujifilm X-H2S Review* - Hybrid APS-C Flagship [ Fuji XH2S ] - bit.ly/FujiX-H2S

@EhsanBhowanaProduction Жыл бұрын

Such an Amazing Video. Please Make a detailed comparison Video on Sony Alpha 7 Mark IV and Canon R6 Mark II.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

@@EhsanBhowanaProduction Thank you! I don't have R6 II, so I am not able to do that.

@mattz9569 9 ай бұрын

I use an XH2 for my commercial professional work, and traded in a lumix GH6 for a sony a 7iv. I should really make a review of real world work with each but im not a reviewer. I use red badge fuji glass, and G Master glass on sony. I'd say I have comparable glass on both. Honest opinion in real world use, it's a flat draw. I would honestly say each has its own absolutely fantastic strengths. As a professional in both photo and video, commercial work, they are both fantastic tools. Personally I'd say if autofocus is your number one priority, go sony. I use manual focus far more than auto... so to me it's a draw. I believe a7iv downsamples from 7k, and fuji from 8k. So I don't see a difference in their highest quality 4k output, in terms of quality. If I need higher resolution for any project i.e. 6k or 8k output... fuji is fantastic. And footage looks great. Most people probably will not need those resolutions, depending on the types of projects they do. Sony also has a slight advantage in low light, due to larger sensor.

@xorrior4438 Жыл бұрын

Bro! This is hardcore! These are literally thee two best bang for your buck cameras out right now and you went ahead and did this! 🤣 Rock on! 🤟

@AATxindurri Жыл бұрын

I just get my X-H2 and made a wedding shooting, it performed incredibly great. I came from Sony full frame and APS-C (a7 II and a6500), not regrets with Fujifilm. Also I have X-E4 and X100F.

@trinhhoangducloc Жыл бұрын

I dont have any fujifilm camera. Between xe4 and x100f, which one do you recommend ?

@AATxindurri Жыл бұрын

@@trinhhoangducloc It depends on the type of photography you do. The X100F with a fixed lens helps to be more creative and the focal length (35mm equivalent) is good for street photography. You can add teleconverters but I think they are too expensive for what they offer. On the other hand, with the X-E4 the advantage is to exchange lenses and the sensor is the fourth generation XTrans. In my opinion, it has better performance than the previous generation. It is fast enough and very discreet for its size. I would recommend the version with the 27mm WR (40mm equivalent) kit lens. Over time you can add lenses with focal lengths that you like.

@soulopticc 8 ай бұрын

Did you really see a big difference from the A7ii to X h2? I'm really in a dilemma as to whether to switch or not. Also what was the difference in the shooting experience and feel of the camera? Thanks in advance.

@AATxindurri 8 ай бұрын

@@soulopticc Hello, I have observed the difference in terms of quality of finish of the structure, performance and image quality. Obviously, they are different technologies 7 years apart. As for weather sealed, definitely Fujifilm in the XH series. But if you already have some Sony lenses, think better about one like the A7IIIa (nota they only III) which they still offer on their site.

@soulopticc 8 ай бұрын

@@AATxindurri I have Fuji lenses too. I have the X pro 2 but doesn't seem like the xpro 4 will be released so I'm thinking about the X h2 but only if it's a big difference to the A7ii

@angeloregina Жыл бұрын

Great review and good comparison of 2 hybrid cameras in the same pricepoint. It is very usefull for someone wanting to have a good hybrid camera in that pricepoint.

@pkolloch Жыл бұрын

Here in Switzerland, the Sony is significantly more expensive and nice lenses as well. (I ordered it anyways)

@RyanH0809 Жыл бұрын

I look forward to seeing your review of the Fujifilm X-T5!

@jumpingman6612 Жыл бұрын

Thank you! This will be interesting.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

@mrz1342 9 ай бұрын

Hi, I like your style of reviewing, very much. It’s short, honest, and to the point. Subscribed :)

@TheHybridShooter 9 ай бұрын

Thank you, I appreciate your subscription!

@olimpiyatsevdas576 Жыл бұрын

hello, I want to build a new set and I have been following your videos for a long time. That's why I need your opinion)) I usually take photos, but the photos I take are printed on 2x1 banners, albeit a little. But I also shoot video. I'm torn between sony a7iv and fujiiflm xh2. Do you think it would be enough for someone like Fuji Beniö? Or what would you recommend?

@krisciesielski4338 6 ай бұрын

Well done for taking into account different ISO standards thumbs 👍

@technodronesogxl9783 Жыл бұрын

As always a honest well presented comparison. I hope to buy an XH2 soon.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@YaYousef5 Жыл бұрын

Been using Fujifilm for 8 years and I almost switched from an X-T3 to the Sony A7iv. I chose not to (yet) because after factoring in the cost of the camera and lenses it would've been around $4000. I love the quality and size of my Fujifilm cameras and the reason to switch would be to get full frame and better auto focus, and I know full frame does make a difference but for my use cause it's not enough for me to pay that much to switch, and I've been happy with the autofocus on my X-T3, I've even shot soccer games with it and it nails fast moving players 95% of the time. Plus, the size of Fujifilm cameras and smaller lenses is really nice! So I'm going to get a used X-T4 for now. When the Sony A7iv price drops down to around $1000 used, I'll be very tempted to switch over to that system!

@Moresco24 Жыл бұрын

what about the a7iii? when comparing images the a7iii images are still better than even the xh2

@YaYousef5 Жыл бұрын

@@Moresco24 Great idea! I'm considering getting an A7iii. You can buy them for around $1100 used nowadays!

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Not really, X-H2 has better output in good light. A7 III is starting to feel quite outdated.

@YaYousef5 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter 9 months ago you called the A7iii the new entry level full frame camera. Is that still true or do you recommend another camera? Used A7iii prices are around $1100 which is nice.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

@@YaYousef5 To be honest, I don't really know anything about the use used market, so I cant help you much with that. A7 III still produces nice output, but the usability is a bit old school by 2023 standards.

@MichaelMoore-bx6st Жыл бұрын

I own both and agree with everything said on this video. One major thing for me that was left out was Fuji film sims and color. If your using these for personal use, this can make a big difference. The Sony will need editing, at least for my taste. The XH2 EVF is crazy good and when switching back and forth the difference is noticable. That said, the normal range ISO RAW files aren't that noticably different, which I think is impressive for Fuji. Unfortunately for my wallet, at this time I'm keeping both.

@gurugamer8632 Жыл бұрын

Which one is superior for image quality?

@MichaelMoore-bx6st Жыл бұрын

@@gurugamer8632 Sony A7IV, but not by much

@Tbonyandsteak 7 ай бұрын

That Evf is a manual focus beast.

@Eikenhorst 7 ай бұрын

I understand that if you want to take pictures without the need for editing, the Fuji with its simulations is probably the best. But if you are interested in buying a camera for this amount of money, I think most are not just going to take the jpeg and use it without any editing. I certainly wouldn't, so I personally don't really see the selling point of film simulations in such high end cameras.

@user-eb2ql3we4k 5 ай бұрын

@@Eikenhorst I used the XT5 about 2 months and decided to switch to a Sony FF camera. What you said is completely real. Fuji film sims are good but its so damn easy to get bored of just shooting jpegs. In terms of editing capability, Sony def got more potential

@stephanweiskorn6760 8 ай бұрын

APSC is an interesting option from FUJIFILM. Lens size and weight is an advantage. Also the price is usually less.

@doublen675 12 күн бұрын

I currently have the A7iv but budget limitations are making it difficult to upgrade any lenses. I can sell my Sony setup and buy the Fuji with a whole mess of lenses. Plus sigma released a bunch of f/2.8 lenses for x-mount so that helps a lot.

@georgestiros4392 Жыл бұрын

ALWAYS GREAT REVIEWS THANK YOU. WHERE DID YOU SHOOT THIS VIDEO? I feel like i have been there.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Thank you, it was shot in Slovakia and Spain.

@cannondale1100 Жыл бұрын

I’m very curious as to which of the two systems has better weather sealing. I prefer landscape and travel photography.. I don’t wanna have to worry too much if I got caught out in the rain or snow. I must say though, I really like both systems, they’re both great. That was a very good comparison.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Thank you! Unfortunately, testing the limits of weather sealing is not possible without damaging the cameras, so I will leave that to somebody who didn’t have to pay for them :)

@cannondale1100 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter Understandable.. Thank you .

@bioliv1 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter I'm sure if you pass 10 million subscribers the camera companies will offer you a camera for free🙂

@canyonblue737-8 Жыл бұрын

it's of little use because it anecdotal but both are reported by actual users as having excellent weather protection and I have never seen users of either lineup of camera report a weather related failure. I have an X-T5 and before a X-T4 and was very comfortable in light rain or snow with a weather sealed lens. I don't know if I'd be out there in a tropical monsoon or a blizzard with icicles hanging off the camera but misty wet landscapes with drizzle and rain... sure.

@JasonFiske Жыл бұрын

I’m curious as well. I’m shooting the XT3 now. I’d like to be confident enough to be reckless with the camera. I hike long distances in warm weather and typically have a pack with a bladder in it. Carrying a camera specific bag isn’t an option. My goal is a camera that is rugged enough to be intermingled in a day pack. The XT3 has held up, but is showing some wear. My hope is that the XH2 with fewer button and a screen that can be turned inward will fit the bill.

@LCM94120 Жыл бұрын

I had a great deal on the Fuji XH2 (1700€) during the Black Friday. But ultimately went for the Sony A7IV for the lens choices available with fantastics alternative the the GM series which are heavy both in price & weight. Loved my Fuji XT series though but the XT5 at 2000€ is too expensive IMO. Very much love my choice going with Sony, no regret whatsoever, even if before I considered Sony the wrong way. Thanks for your great review btw :)

@bbasleigh6149 Жыл бұрын

As owner of X-T3 with 16-55mm f2,8 to consider with X-H2S with 26mp stacked sensor. Sony riding high with full-frame cameras and lenses like 20mm / 24mm / 35mm. Comparing full-frame with APS-C complement for Fuji. Agree X-T5 price way over the odds. X-T4 at 1.800 euros? Or Z9 / R5?

@antistiolabeo8950 Жыл бұрын

That was a rational and well informed choice all things considered. Something every consumer was supposed to do and still fails to do way too often these days.

@PartyingLemons 11 ай бұрын

I've used both systems, but switched to Fuji... Both systems are absolutely fantastic and you can't go wrong with either.

@simonpierre3713 9 ай бұрын

Film simulation from fuji is not missing you ?

@kapilesh14 Жыл бұрын

I am almost as excited for you camera videos as I am for a good sci fi or horror movie. I really like your extremely sombre and simple style.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Thank you, I appreciate it!

@weddingphotographer8232 Жыл бұрын

I have a question........ Does MOZA Aircross 2 support Fuji X-H2 ...... ????

@94Ninsound94 Жыл бұрын

Nice video, as the A7 III is currently with AND without cashback less expensive than the X-T5 in Euroland, would you mind doing a A7 III vs X-T5 someday? The A7 III is 2198€ with a 40mm 2.5 G when a X-T5 is 2448€ with the 27mm 2.8.

@tauritaal Жыл бұрын

Idk how much those lenses are worth but A7iii itself should be around 1300 euros body. If you pay more, you are overpaying for almost 5 years old model. It is capable camera but outdated and stores keeps milking people. It was under 2000 euros four years ago, why people still buy for those prices. A7iii isnt a investment object that gains value.

@94Ninsound94 Жыл бұрын

@@tauritaal 40mm 2.5 G is 699€. And as long as the A7 IV is substantially morr expansive than the III, retailers are not going to sell it for peanuts. But I guess it depends from country to country.

@obscurelines Жыл бұрын

One of the few reviewers to say that the Fuji tracking isn't bad.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Showing it is much more important.

@just_eirik Жыл бұрын

Do you have more photos from the 50mm f1 at f1, shot which this camera or the X-T5? Would love to see how it holds up with those sensors.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

No, I haven't used it with 40mp sensor at all.

@just_eirik Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter oh I misunderstood! I thought the X-H2 you had there was the 40mp.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

@@just_eirik It is, but I have never used it with 50mm F1.

@just_eirik Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter oh! I must have been more tired than I realized last night. I thought I saw a photo from the X-H2 with the 50 f1. I thought I saw you holding it too. Maybe it was the new 56?

@Battlem0nk Жыл бұрын

Basically Sony still has rock solid reliable AF while Fuji while improved can hit/miss depending on situation,. What if you used CL LOW SPEED BURST to closer match with the A7IV 10fps. Would the in-focus hit rate be better or 100% like Sony? From a user experience looking in the EVF Sony AF tracking box moved more smooth/pleasant. Fuji displays it more choppy or flicker? Trying to save battery or conserve CPU resources? Does it matter if in performance mode or not? Don't like the 3 new iso/wb/custom button position on the right hand. Felt awkward to press if finger is already on the shutter. Need to shift hand grip position to reach. I've used the X-H1 for years and rarely looked at the top LCD screen.

@TheCooldruid Жыл бұрын

Will you be doing a comparison on the new Sony IV vs the XH2?

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

This is it.

@TheCooldruid Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter Whoops! I meant 7R V vs XH2

@mden2490 10 ай бұрын

Thanks for a great video. The stills on the XH-2 were definitely more crisp clear and detailed and the color science is fantastic. Have you updated the newest firmware for the Fuji which just came out in May. This updated included AF. If so, have you seen any improvements?

@TheHybridShooter 10 ай бұрын

You're welcome! Not really, as you can see in the video. The amount of detail is pretty much the same. Yes, I have updated the FW, AF is significantly better.

@WillJBailey Жыл бұрын

So torn between these two. I have an xs10 which I love, and would partner really well with the xh2, but the Sony seems like the more sensible decision, for the full frame features and second hand options…

@renatobfa Жыл бұрын

In your case, you should ask yourself what you want from the new camera that the xs10 can't provide for you. For me, I'm pretty happy with my xs10 and I would love more megapixels to shoot artwork properly, so the xh2 (with the pixel shift) is perfect, and as a bonus, they both share the same lens mount. The xs10 is great for me at the moment tho, I just bought it and i am watching this video because of the eager to know whats next hehehehe. The plan is to glue the 27mm f2.8 in the xs10 for the small compact combo, and leave the hx2 mostly for home/studio cases, with the 33mm f1.4. But for you, it could be low light performance, lens selection, etc, so the sony could be a better pair. hope this helps.

@WillJBailey Жыл бұрын

@@renatobfa The XS10 really is a marvel for street and travel photography - the images you can get from such a small device is incredible. It goes everywhere with me. But no weather sealing or dual card slots is an issue - I hope Fuji fixes that with the next version (I suspect they won't as it's supposed to be a budget amateur camera). But the resolution isn't high enough for photographing artwork, so it's always a b cam for me. The XH2 ticks so many boxes, but buying new is painful - as is downsizing to APSC (from an EOSR), when the camera is still quite big. Does make up for it though with the ace small lenses and Fuji colours.

@awake780 Жыл бұрын

@@mcsnapplesthis was my feeling when I tested the Sony a7iii vs the Fuji XH1. I sold the H1 for a T3 later, but the film simulations and Color science SOOC was what won me over. I went from shooting 100% raw to 100% JPEG in the past year as a result. My workflow is faster, easier, and more enjoyable thanks to Fuji’s JPEGs. It doesn’t mean I’m not tempted by the full package of the A7iv though! Lol

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

@@mcsnapples That is one of the old Sony myths dating back to A7 II. Fuji prefers clod tones, Sony slightly warm tones, that's about it...

@WillJBailey Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter I have no experience of using Sonys but I definitely prefer Fuji colours out of the box to Canon’s, which I always found a bit over-saturated. Ultimately you can change colours how you want anyway in post, shooting RAW, but Fuji’s film simulations are an awesome shorthand in Lightroom.

@malikharden5124 Жыл бұрын

I have a h2 it’s the perfect camera. The eye af will definitely let you down at times with half focused shots. Hopefully they fix with software 🤞🏾🤞🏾

@njm2557 Жыл бұрын

Yup! It will track well but then you look at some of the shots and they’re not in focus.

@TyCrane26 Жыл бұрын

If the eye af let’s you down, does that still make it the perfect camera? 🤔

@WrongEnd 8 ай бұрын

Any update for this issue ? Im considering buying one.

@malikharden5124 8 ай бұрын

@@WrongEnd ended up ditching the camera before the updates I was just missing too many shots

@pinetworkminer8377 Жыл бұрын

For Sony, is A7V the latest version? Or is there an A7VI?

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

A7 IV is the latest camera in the line.

@MariNate1016 Жыл бұрын

love my x-h2. AF is sus sometimes, but IQ is amazing for me

@ze3bar 10 ай бұрын

this is an excellent comparison! can you compare Sony with H2S?!

@TheHybridShooter 10 ай бұрын

Thank you, I already have.

@ze3bar 10 ай бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter i'll look for it thanks!

@ofautomotive Жыл бұрын

Could you please do a comparaison with the X-H2S vs X-H2 :)

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, I am not able to do that.

@ofautomotive Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter thank you for your reply, maybe you could velp me to choose between both ? Which is best for only photography ? (Dynamic range / Iso...) between both ?

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

If you don't intend to shoot fast action, X-H2 will be a better choice.

@Chemike21 6 ай бұрын

This is a totally green stupid question, but do both camera's come with the lenses? Nobody mentions if they do or not. Some pics have them, some don't.

@katycastillano4217 5 ай бұрын

You can buy them without lens (body only) or with lens, usually with zoom lens (at higher price )

@ooharloo Жыл бұрын

I sadly left the Fuji system for the Sony a7 iv as the lens selection is just much better. I would later on like to own the X100v or the newer version whenever that releases.

@tobyr8555 Жыл бұрын

How do you find the IQ of the Sony after moving from Fuji?

@trinhhoangducloc Жыл бұрын

Do you recommend x100v or xe4 ? I am using sony system but would like to buy a new fujifilm camera.

@kites4121 Жыл бұрын

Get a speedbooster and you can use any full frame glass you want and have an extra stop of light. Viltrox speedbooster is $200 and METABONES speedboosters are like $500. The image quality and autofocus on the viltrox are just as good, the only downside is the viltrox can catch lens flares, and the viltrox only makes a speedbooster for EF lenses, whereas METABONES makes speedboosters for pretty much every lens mount.

@just_eirik Жыл бұрын

What lenses were you missing on Fuji?

@gam3955 Жыл бұрын

Great review, thanks. I’ve both cameras and I like shooting with both. When I received my X-H2, I wanted to sell the A7R4 but I decided to keep it.

@patrickcoggins6279 Жыл бұрын

What is it about the Fuji that you prefer over the Sony? Are you mainly a stills or video shooter?

@gam3955 Жыл бұрын

@@patrickcoggins6279 i prefer stills with Sony

@patrickcoggins6279 Жыл бұрын

@@gam3955 Thanks for the reply.

@shamronco Жыл бұрын

hello. a quick question after watching this video and many others. I am a FUJI shooter but I believe the reason to go ASPC are not really as valid as a few years back. I am thinking of going to A7IV (currently own X-H2). If money is not really the issue would you go FF in 2023? the sony lens selections an FF low light is really appealing. In other words is it still valid to go APSC? Price difference and weight is not as big anymore. Thank you.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Well, that is basically what this video is about, so I can’t tell you much more than I have already said in the video.

@ghas4151 Жыл бұрын

Other reviewers were saying that the X-H2S tracks more smoothly than the X-H2 due to the faster readout of the stacked sensor. It is able to do more AF calculations per second. Was this your experience?

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

I wasn't able to test them side-by-side. Subjectively, the AF performance was very similar, although it is not possible to test the X-H2 at 40fps.

@tomapaunovic Жыл бұрын

Typically with Fuji, bodies are great and well-priced but the lens leaves a lot to be desired in terms of performance, price, and size/weight. On top of that, they are still a generation behind in terms of AF. To be fair, the newest lenses are excellent optically but they have again skimped on the AF motor on some of the lenses (like the new 56mm 1.2).

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

I agree, Fuji camera selection is significantly ahead of the lens selection. I hope that it will get better next year. 3rd party manufacturers are also releasing some interesting X-mount lenses.

@qubertzumfurstenstein7885 Жыл бұрын

Fuji APSC lenses are much smaller than the equivalent full-frame lens. They are relatively expensive, but the ones i have tried are very high quality. I think the price matches the optical performance and build quality.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Not at all, if you mean actually equivalent lenses.

@tomapaunovic Жыл бұрын

@@qubertzumfurstenstein7885 Actually they are almost always bigger than equivalent FF lenses. Their F2.8 zooms are significantly bigger than F4 FF zooms (sometimes bigger even than F2.8 FF zooms), and same story goes for F1.2 or F1.4 primes vs FF F1.8 or F2 primes. Newest Fuji primes are excellent in terms of optics, but older lenses leave a lot to be desired. You can see in this video that Fuji 16-55 F2.8 is visibly poorer than Sigma 24-70 2.8, and that's the best standard zoom available for Fuji right now.

@manuelight Жыл бұрын

what about the 33mm 1.4? - that seems to be the best one they got for street photography

@adnan_velic Жыл бұрын

I remember when I had my a7iv it got hot fast just being on not even recording. I thought that was strange. I would not trust that Sony for longer periods of recording and especially in warmer climates. This is one reason why I got the xh2s and sold the a7iv. The xh2s never got hot on me and I shoot 4k60p A LOT!

@adnan_velic Жыл бұрын

@GoodFellas I have done this. This is NOT my first Sony camera. Before that I had a a6300 then a a6400 and I’m very well aware of high temp settings. This does not change the fact that the camera gets HOT in idle mode. This tells me that the heat management in the a7iv is not good.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

You can trust it in the sense that it will not turn off, if you use High temperature setting.

@NateLL8767 Жыл бұрын

For me, the biggest disadvantage of the Fuji is the camera size. Despite having a cropped sensor, Fuji X-H2's size and weight are quite comparable with Song full-size-sensor cameras'.

@finnharvor6773 Жыл бұрын

That’s a good point. I like crop sensor because of the portability even though the a7iv is superb.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Not really. Fuji makes much smaller cameras, such as X-S10 or X-E4. Making the camera smaller than A7 IV / X-H2 size would negatively affect the handling, which would be an issue with a camera in this category.

@finnharvor6773 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter That’s a good point. But I must emphasize that I found out via daily experience- and was surprised - that weight is a major factor in terms of the « camera one carries. » I bought into the Sony system with an a5000 - no one’s idea of a pro camera. But I always had it with me and resultingly got good footage; poetic videos in film festivals, sometimes winning prizes. I’d love to buy some Fuji cameras but I can’t afford both a Sony and Fuji ecosystem. So now I have two crop bodies and a full frame. I really enjoy your videos, btw.

@NateLL8767 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter I understand the handling aspect and all that. Just for me, I wish Fuji can make a more portable camera with as strong video specs for Vloging market.

@adnan_velic Жыл бұрын

@@NateLL8767 they can’t due to thermal issues. The xh2 and xh2s shoot high quality codecs and that generates a lot of heat.

@_Donald_Duck. Жыл бұрын

I would like to see comparison between Sony A7M4 and Fujifilm X-T5 =)

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

I will make X-T5 and X-H2 comparison, so that should give you an idea together with this video.

@awake780 Жыл бұрын

Lots of similarities with the XH2 image quality but less features and noticeably smaller. If you value portability and weight, the XT5 is worth a look. Especially with third party autofocus lenses coming out.

@rotorfpv4117 Жыл бұрын

why not xh2s?

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

I already compared it to X-H2S

@Wissperwind Жыл бұрын

I don't think that the resolution is a draw! The Fuji is mouch sharper. Compare the readability of the text. For example the word stop on the filter. The o is only readable on the Fuji.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

It is a draw. I can read it on both. The exposure is a bit brighter on the Fuji which may cause some difference. Also, you only see images after YT compression, I have compared many samples without the compression.

@RcMedya Жыл бұрын

a7s iii vs a7r v

@williamsolis1 Жыл бұрын

I wanted to really love the Fuji system but as a working photographer, there were too many compromises for me so I switched. I've had the A7III for almost 4 years and it's been incredibly reliable and I'd only get the A7IV for the screen and AF. I'd consider getting the X100V successor when that comes out.

@isavkov Жыл бұрын

I would compare X-H2 to Sony FX30, since they are in the same price range :)

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Sure, that is a relevant comparison as well, although X-H2S would be even better match since they use the same resolution.

@xikefocus Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooterYou mean the same sensor MP (26.1 MP)? They’re not the same sensor.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

No, I mean that it is the same sensor.

@xikefocus Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter I don’t think it’s the same sensor. The XH2S has stacked sensor which is expensive and much faster. People say the FX30 might use the one from the Fuji XT4 (not from XH2S).

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Yes, my mistake, I thought that the FX30 sensor is stacked.

@marcomarcon5802 Жыл бұрын

Great review, it should be noted however that the Fuji is significantly cheaper

@MusaAli-eq8cb 10 ай бұрын

Sony a7iv or Fuji x h2 ???

@TheHybridShooter 10 ай бұрын

That is what this video is about.

@jonathanellis5811 6 ай бұрын

XH2 got a firmware update today buffing the AF! I don’t own one, but it’s the camera I’d buy if I invest in Fuji. My biggest concern is the AF; I’m a professional, and I can’t operate my business on unreliable focus. So if this firmware update makes a considerable change, I might make a considerable change of ecosystem 😏 not that there’s anything wrong with Sony; my a7III is fabulous; I just love the Fuji look

@TheHybridShooter 6 ай бұрын

No, it didn't, the last update was in late September.

@jonathanellis5811 6 ай бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter thank you for the correction, but that firmware update was the update that included the AF improvement I was talking about.

@imharikrish Жыл бұрын

I think A7IV vs X-T5; A7RIV vs X-H2 and A7SIII vs X-H2S would be an interesting comparison.

@Vinterloft Жыл бұрын

Fuji is covering the whole range of perfect lenses. Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Fuji 18mm, 23 and 33 F1.4, the new macro and the 56mm, the 90mm F2, the Samyang 135mm F2, (best lens ever) the 200mm and the 150-600mm. Sony just has better zooms in some ranges, so fits lazy people better. But the categories where Fuji wins, they actually dominate. People who complain about Fuji lenses are buying the wrong ones for the sensor they have. If you have the X-H2, the *only* options are the ones I just mentioned. And they're fantastic options.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Not really. Even some of the newer lenses have significant issues, such as very loud AF motor on the new 18mm F1.4. A lot of lenses are due for an update, especially the zooms. Sony has a better selection in every aspect, X-mount realistically doesn't beat E-mount lens selection in any category. The statement that the zoom lenses are for lazy people it a complete nonsense of course.

@pierrelaviolette670 Жыл бұрын

You said fuji only tracks faces, does animals and birds too. I understand what you meant though. Sony skin colour is bad, there is a recent video that compares Sony, fuji and canon and really fuji colour makes its weakness irrelevant as colour in the other two are so bad

@Michail95i2 Жыл бұрын

Thank you very much for the content from fraternal Belarus Bardzo dziękuję za treści z braterskiej Białorusi

@cassijoanna Жыл бұрын

A7iv all the way baby! It's an awesome gimbal video camera. Can't have autofocus that's not 100% qhen using a gimbal

@littleidols Жыл бұрын

do you prefer autofocus continuous or automatic when using gimbal?

@Alexrocks1253 Жыл бұрын

A7RV with XH2 comparison should be a good comparison with 8K video and high res stills being easily comparable.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

There is a huge price difference, so that would mostly be "for fun" comparison.

@Alexrocks1253 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter absolutely but they are both high resolution monsters and it would be fun to see if the A7RV is worth the extra nearly $2000 for most people

@mrjohnbaseley Жыл бұрын

Everyone watching hoping Fuji is better than Sony, only to find that they close the gap but never reach the mark. Both nice cameras - for low light and fast AF, go Sony IMHO with sports photography (Boxing) as a specific example.

@Battlem0nk Жыл бұрын

Think Fuji did closed the gap but Sony just took another step ahead. A75 without AI AF chip still beats Fuji with new AI. Wait till A75 gets AI chip like the A7R5. BTW, that A7R5 4-Axis LCD screen is amazing. Best of both worlds. End the religious flip vs tilt arguments.

@Battlem0nk Жыл бұрын

@@Eyeofkamau Well that is the case for any brand or camera model. Isn't always apple to apple. Pro/Con with each. But, we're talking about AF performance here and Sony just hands down without a doubt just works. Fuji could work almost as well but only if you set it up correctly or know it's quirks for different situation. There is always a "but" case. Doesn't mean that is bad, but just not on par with the best. Sometimes almost as good is plenty for users.

@mden2490 10 ай бұрын

If compare the stills in this video, it’s pretty clear that the Fuji delivered much cleaner, crisp detailed photos. The color science is fantastic. BTW I have a Sony so no bias here. Don’t get me wrong The a7iv is a great camera.II have an a6400 now and am ready to upgrade and trying to decide between these two cameras. The a6400 does have af but it’s just okay and does not have bird tracking and active tracking. Though the Sony has better tracking, seems to me Fuji is not that far behind and I would be happy with either of the two cameras. I believe Fuji has taken the correct steps to try to improve AF by releasing updates with the latest one in May. You’ve got to admit the photos on the Fuji are fantastic and that’s what is making my decision a bit more difficult? I would be using the camera primarily for bird and wildlife photography.

@julienbeltran3714 Жыл бұрын

I fond it hard to understand : Sony is an electronic consumer company that builds smart phones and tv, yet they have miserable screens and a shockingly poor touch screen implementation... What is going on ? Panasonic, which is an electronics company as well has a very good touch screen implementation for 10 years ! That never stops to surprise me.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Screen is a lot better than the specs would suggests. Touch screen implementation is very good in the cameras with new UI.

@hilarbaburek4695 Жыл бұрын

Such comparisons always amuse me. KZfaqr probably doesn't realize that crop and FF have different depth of field. So I can shoot 1 EV less with crop than with FF. Fuji has way better colors directly after transfer from RAF. Tuning SONY colors is much more tedious. I'm not even talking about video options. Fuji has much better ones. The purpose of these "comparisons" is to show that they don't take pictures like SONY. He must have also used Adobe Lightroom, which X-Trans is known not to be able to do much.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

This is an ISO test meant to tell the viewers what ISO can be used on each camera with certain level of noise. I am not interested in messing it up by using different apertures. Colours part is just your opinion. If you prefer Fuji, it is completely fine, buy try to be reasonable please.

@gaza4543 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooterspot on! though he/she does bring up a good point, capture one does handle the higher ISO’s very differently and seems to give a cleaner look. At least in my experience though the enhance mode in Lightroom closes the gap. But tbh I’m happy to use fujis well into the higher ISO’s the grain structure is pleasing to me even Lightroom. Just my 2 cent from a stranger on line.

@mayfilmes1265 Жыл бұрын

fuji xh2😍😍😍😍😍😍😍

@dantedimaano9556 Жыл бұрын

I think when it comes to price, Fuji wins.

@djmocok Жыл бұрын

With Fuji, you can set it to AFC then press and hold to focus so that the point locks on the subject, then it will follow the subject around/refocus if you move camera too. So I say no disadvantage compared to Sony

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Only in stills. I was talking about video.

@MrKnobs5 Жыл бұрын

You drone on and on as if either of these cameras is going to make you a better photographer

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

That is the weirdest comment that I have read in a very long time.

@awake780 Жыл бұрын

The Color science isn’t even close. I concede that the Sony is arguably the best mirrorless camera for the price, but I greatly prefer the images from the Fuji.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

That is one of the old Sony myths dating back to A7 II. Fuji prefers clod tones, Sony slightly warm tones, that's about it...

@awake780 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter the white balance shift on skin tones is noticeably more green too. I think we can agree that this isn’t a concern for raw only shooters. As a JPEG shooter, the film simulations and Color science do make a difference. Your miles may vary…

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

@@awake780 No, I don't agree with green shift at all (in RAW or JPEG). As, I have said, that is a myth dating back to A7 II, completely fixed in 2018.

@awake780 Жыл бұрын

@@TheHybridShooter agree to disagree. Good review nonetheless.

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Thank you, although I can't even agree to disagree on this one. Color accuracy is perfectly measurable and there is objectively no green shift, especially not with new color science introduces with A7S III.

@georgestiros4392 Жыл бұрын

oh i see Belarus

@TheHybridShooter Жыл бұрын

Definitely not, I hlave never been there.