2 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@nobodyknowstevinkeith 3 сағат бұрын
Can you please include a link to the RCA Swiss compatible plate from small rig because I can’t find it
@mkphotonet 8 сағат бұрын
I have been using the Fuji X100VI and found the sharpness difference between Jpeg color film profiles and RAW to be significant. All the file modification for Jpeg are off, (i.e. Smooth Skin Effect). I will continue shooting Jpeg & RAW but would be interested knowing which Jpeg color film profile would be the sharpest?
@ruechel 13 сағат бұрын
you're one of the best reviewers of photo gear on KZfaq. Thanks very much for your great work.
@TheHybridShooter 10 сағат бұрын
My pleasure, thank you for watching!
@Gibolingos 15 сағат бұрын
I sold the a7iii and bought the x-s20. Everything is better and faster.
@HamsterDesertEagle 20 сағат бұрын
I’ll only pay attention to Gordon from camera labs for lens test. Indoor close up isn’t realistic for comparing two lenses. Gordon does infinity testing at long distances.
@TheHybridShooter 16 сағат бұрын
Two words regarding outdoors lens testing at long distances: atmospheric haze. Relevant lens testing can only be done in interior.
@sl-rt5kv 21 сағат бұрын
Clearly, the image stabilization in the X100VI give it an advantage over the V in handheld lowlight shots of still subjects. However, I also wonder about how the low light capabilities of these cameras compare in terms of noise. Other things being equal, the larger pixels in the 26MP camera should give it an advantage over a 40MP camera in this regard. On the other hand, if the 40MP is a better sensor with newer technology this isn't necessarily the case.
@TheHybridShooter 16 сағат бұрын
ISO comparison between X-Trans 5 HR and X-Trans 4 is here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h5eqnJCJxMCWpXk.htmlsi=8iNWiUsauYd31-nL&t=170 Better low light with lower resolution is an old myth, it doesn't work that way, due to the effect of downsampling.
@ianmcpartland9306 15 сағат бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter a myth? are you sure? That is quite a statement
@TheHybridShooter 15 сағат бұрын
@@ianmcpartland9306 I obviously am sure, I have shown bulletproof evidence in numerous comparisons, including the one posted above.
@sl-rt5kv 7 сағат бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter I was under the impression that downsampling reduces the resolution of an image.
@TheHybridShooter 7 сағат бұрын
@@sl-rt5kv Yes and it compresses the noise in the process, which is why high-res cameras are not wrose in low light.
@francischang 21 сағат бұрын
Great analysis, TY! Hope you'll do a head-to-head comparison with the Ricoh GR III. The comparisons I've seen suggest that the Ricoh is sharper despite the resolution disadvantage. In practice, I have found that the X100VI is "sharp enough" for most real-world scenarios. So far, I only have only ever taken one real world image where I might have wanted a sharper lens.
@TheHybridShooter 15 сағат бұрын
Thank you! Unfortunately, I don't have a GR III, so I am not able to do a comparison.
@pawpaw324 23 сағат бұрын
I appreciate your perspective. Hopefully, I will get my X100 VI before 2025. lol
@AwesomeKicks Күн бұрын
Another youtuber mentioned that the raw images are pretty soft compared to the jpegs, which was not a thing with the X100V. Did you try out the jpegs or the war images in this review? Can you pls check raw and jpeg sharpness difference?
@GhosT396 14 сағат бұрын
You can see in his video he uses RAW files processed with the enhance function of Lightroom
@dccoletrain Күн бұрын
Great idea for a video. I was going to test mine out if I ever get it…. People shoot Fuji because of the style and trying to get film like pictures. Crazy sharpness is not needed. Another KZfaqr said in video it was as sharp as his A7IV so people just want to complain.
@StephenFiorentini Күн бұрын
I just recorded a band promo on this camera. 1080 x 60 fps. Auto focus single mode and left on auto mode for adjustments. Microphone was the same as this, video mic pro. This may not be a video first camera but it worked well. I put the vid up on my YT page.
@SneakyCaleb Күн бұрын
Ricoh gr is much sharper
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
I don’t believe that.
@SneakyCaleb Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter I am shooting the x100iv side by side with the Ricoh griiiX HDF and yes the files are sharper. Megapixels don’t mean anything at this point. I print large 20x30 with 20 megapixels all the time and it looks incredible. The lens of the Ricoh cameras is in another league. And I don’t really care about sharpness tbh I throw a pro mist filter on most of my lenses and use my film presets. But there’s no denying the Ricoh is much sharper.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
@@SneakyCaleb I have already busted one of these "undeniable" claims, so I don't care about written statements anymore. I would be happy to look at your testing, but considering the comparison with Viltrox 27mm F1.2 shown in the video, I am extremely skeptical about your claim.
@SneakyCaleb Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter the Ricoh GR lens is sharper than the Viltrox. But again sharpness isn’t everything.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
@SneakyCaleb Impossible. Nothing that I have ever tested on APS-C is sharper than that Viltrox. Not even Sony GM lenses. Whether you care about the sharpness is up to you…
@mostlyfinnishlifeeventsand5112 Күн бұрын
Excellent video, thanks. Posted the link to DPR's comment section of their most recent article on the camera.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@zenstoodi Күн бұрын
I’d like to see close focus performance / sharpness
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Maybe next time.
@gelliereloj3686 Күн бұрын
Is this compatible with the Z50?
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
only with adapter
@toysars Күн бұрын
Great review! I also enjoyed the more detailed lens review for x100vi.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@toysars Күн бұрын
I have to say, this was best technical X100VI review I have seen on X100VI. Great comparisons for lens performance.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@ductrung3993 Күн бұрын
Would you be able to compare it with an original Leica Q which is not that much more expensive used? Thank you!😊
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Unfortunately not, I have never seen original Leica Q.
@MrKalistratov Күн бұрын
Both lenses seem to be inferior to ricoh gr's. The 100VI IS noticably sharper. Thank you for the video.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Considering the amount of misinformation surrounding this topic and ridiculous testing methodology that I have seen in some videos, I wouldn't be surprised if there was some catch the GR comparisons. You're welcome!
@MrKalistratov Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter I made my statement based on my experience using the Ricoh GR III. I am blown away by the quality of this lens, taking into accout that I have a Fuji 18 1.4 lens and use it together with the GR III lens, and I find that the small lens of the Ricoh GR III can compete with the Fuji's 18 1.4. lens. I also have a Fuji 27 2.8 lens which seems pretty dull to me, and I used to have a Fuji 23 2.0, which was pretty good, but not impressive. Therefore, unfortunately I didn't have a chance to test the Fuji 100V or VI lens, but the GR lens is that good, that I highly doubt it can compete with it. Your comparison is crazy good!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
@@MrKalistratov As you can see in the comparison with Viltrox 27mm F1.2 Pro, it can actually compete with any lens. That is why I am extremely skeptical about those GR claims. Thank you!
@MrKalistratov Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter Viltrox clearly outperforms the X100VI lens, but it's decent. It will be interesting to see your review of the Ricoh GR III lens, may be some of your skepticism will fade away :)
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
@@MrKalistratov No, it doesn't, as you can see in the video, at least not at F5.6 in the center of the frame. I don't intend to review GR III, so it will remain a mystery for me :)
@juleshorse9056 Күн бұрын
As a XT5/16-55f2.8 user and a first time v100 user, I am very happy with my x100vi image quality, including with the WCL. And, it is simply fun to use!
@thomaschamberlin2485 Күн бұрын
The quite different results on other channels makes me wonder if there was a problem with pre-production units or if there is poor quality control that may be ongoing. Samuel Streetlife showed a remarkable difference between the X100VI and his Ricoh GR3x.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
There is no reason why there would be any quality control issues, Fujifilm has been making this lens since 2020. Considering the amount of misinformation and poor testing methodology that I have seen, I only trust my own testing at the moment. I prefer not to comment on other videos, but the testing methodology in that video doesn't exactly inspire confidence to put it hyperpolitely.
@cineffect Күн бұрын
Finally a review i have been looking for! Thank you!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
You’re welcome, thank you for watching!
@111ch1a1d111 Күн бұрын
I'm curious how they compare when filling the FoV equally after crop, meaning, if the VI is center cropped to 26MP while standing further from the subject, how close is it to the detail in the V when closer. Because if a "crop zoom" gets you decent images, that can make the 40MP worthwhile.
@tomheim9516 Күн бұрын
Very well done, as are all your videos!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@Tbonyandsteak Күн бұрын
If you want full resolutions, you got to give the camera enough exposures, that means low ISO and expose just under the highlight gets blown. You will get full resolutions abd without artifacts with lenses that is not even labeled as a full 40 mp resolutions lense. Another thing the shutter needs twice the shutter speed as a 26 mp in order to get sharp images handheld. Off course the IS helps so you get slower shutterspeed. So defferently 40 mp are more demanding for those that have no clues with 40 mp. If you know what you are doing 40 mp are mindblowing.
@villageblunder4787 Күн бұрын
Could have sworn that was Barcelona.
@RonaldBrown59 Күн бұрын
Great information, thanks for sharing.
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
My pleasure, thank you for watching!
@BuhdFrankDaTank93 Күн бұрын
The critics are the people who paid above msrp for their x100v 😂, technology improves, get over it.
@atselykovskiy Күн бұрын
2:44 (and 8:25) Different boxes left and right
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Yes, I copied wrong label, sorry about that. 2:44 is correct. Edit: both are actually correct.
@atselykovskiy Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooterThe label seems right. I mean prints are slightly different
@atselykovskiy Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooterFor example, letter "E" in word "MAGNETIC" has white spot in its corner in the right image
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
@@atselykovskiy Yes, the labels are correct, I got confused for a second. It is the always same box. White spots are optical imperfections / artifacts.
@atselykovskiy Күн бұрын
@@TheHybridShooterI thought you put two different boxes in central and corner parts of the frame
@Powerland56 Күн бұрын
Valid information, better than other clickbaiting YTers as Northrup or Granger. Respect!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you"
@nkjoep Күн бұрын
Great content! Well done! 👍
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@NotAnotherChannel_Channel Күн бұрын
I’m not sure what critics of this camera were expecting. It is pretty much identical to the V with the exception of a much faster processor, subject tracking, and IBIS. The 40mp was a nice bump, but the IBIS made this camera night and day different… better… than the already awesome X100V. For me, Fujifilm hit the nail on the head. The VI lens resolves perfectly well. I have zero complaints. Great review.
@Paul_Rohde Күн бұрын
Currently, Tony & Chelsea Northrup have 1.62 M subscribers and you have 119K subscribers. With respect to Mr Northrup's comments on the X100VI lens sharpness, you've given a much more definitive review, and arguably a more accurate conclusion, compared to their given shot in dubious lighting on a print. Your crops on my 43 inch monitor revealed that the X100VI was clearer for all apertures shown, perceivably due to the higher sensor resolution. Thus the lens is certainly capable of delivering the optical quality for the 40 MP sensor.
@gondokingo3931 Күн бұрын
I’ve seen so many people saying on his video and on that video by that Ricoh shooter (can’t remember his name but he seems to be German and Japanese?) saying Ricoh lenses have been confirmed sharper and everybody knows it, and that this lens doesn’t resolve. And no matter how many times I ask people don’t send me to any rigorous testing on the subject, it’s just “trust me bro”. I’ve been waiting for an in depth technical analysis video of this lens
@wehavefamily Күн бұрын
completely agree with you here. Tony and Chelsea feel like they are doing quick tests for the views only. Their recent video about complaints on the x100vi make them seem like amateur photographers rather than the pros they say they are. Lost respect for them when they said image quality is close to phone..
@snapithappy647 Күн бұрын
The best video comparison on KZfaq 👌👏🏻👍 this video really hits the nail on the head for other KZfaqrs who talk so much crap 💩 one question is that does the Nikon fz camera have better image quality than fujifilms 40 mp cameras? At higher iso values?
@Abc1987 Күн бұрын
I have the Zf and x100vi, while not testing as rigorously as this it seemed to me pretty strongly in favor of the Zf for high ISO
@Abc1987 Күн бұрын
But the Zf with a lens is significantly heavier and larger…
@Mw02veg Күн бұрын
But it’s smaller and doesn’t have that videography flip out screen
@analogphotographyTV Күн бұрын
first like , an then watch the video :)
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@SideshowBob44 Күн бұрын
I'm perfectly happy with my X100V and don't feel a need to upgrade, only thing I really want is IBIS.
@przybylskipawel Күн бұрын
in a nutshell... THX!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
My pleasure!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
*Fujifilm X100VI Review* - The Phenomenon [ Fuji X100VI ] - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q8eedrx31Mu-iGQ.html Regarding the "GR III is shaper" claims: I don't have a GR III, so I am not able to test that. Considering the comparison between the X100VI and one of the sharpest APS-C lenses shown in this video, I don't see how the GR III with 24 MP sensor could capture more detail than X100VI, so I am extremely skeptical about "GR III is sharper" claims. I haven't found any comparison between X100VI and GR III with decent testing methodology, so there is not much more that I can say about that.
@AndreiDimaReviews Күн бұрын
Nice video!
@TheHybridShooter Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@devasiamangalath4961 Күн бұрын
Dji pocket 2 🥰 Thankyou ❤️
@mmerri93 2 күн бұрын
Does it work with the A7iV? 🤞🏾
@mmerri93 2 күн бұрын
Does it work with the A7iV?
@korrigan6072 2 күн бұрын
I don't understand why people make such a big deal about the joystick, when you can either select directly on the screen, or use the fabulous 3D tracking.
@SPRZAN 2 күн бұрын
This Lens is Native for Full Frame or Aps-C???
@TheHybridShooter 2 күн бұрын
APS-C
@schreibmawas 3 күн бұрын
Someone knows why I can't change the aperture opening when A mode using this lense?! 😢
@devasiamangalath4961 3 күн бұрын
Very good ❤️🎉
@lalodealba4258 3 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@afferist 5 күн бұрын
great shots! thanks
@afferist 5 күн бұрын
thanks 8)
@sdwvit 5 күн бұрын
What was that unreleased lens at 13:15 mark?