sounds like you need to take a photography course. you shouldnt expect the camera manufacturer to provide a tutorial as part of the instruction manual.

6 years ago.. 👁-👁

sounds like you need a photography course. dont blame the camera maker for your own incompetence.

RedroomStudios My comments were directed to Ralfs, not you. Rather than helping others like Ralfs, you've chosen to spend your life as an arrogant critic producing nothing but hot air and contributing to global warming. Judging by your spelling and grammar, you need to go back to grammar school.

Bruce Schwartz please feel free to point out exactly which spelling and grammar errors I made. and isnt that really the beauty of internet comments? anyone can jump in and respond. is it arrogant to be critical of people who are apparently incapable of being the least bit self sufficient? I mean really... how hard is it to scroll through menus and see what your options are? that is really the beauty of digital cameras - you can experiment with different settings and it doesnt cost you anything or waste film. the menus are mostly self explanatory and many settings include tips right on the screen. the live preview screen shows you how the changes you make to the settings will affect the image. photography has never been so easy.

they do give a thorough manual instructions... they tell you how to do everything, but they dont tell you why you might want to do anything. you cant expect the instructions to also include a photography tutorial.

the great thing about digital cameras with live preview screen is that when you are not sure what the correct white balance is for a certain lighting condition, you can scroll through the WB options and see immediately on your screen which setting is working best. when you say artificial lights with a reddish result on auto setting... I am thinking you mean incandescent lights, simply choose the incandescent bulb setting (the one the looks like a lightbulb). sorry, I cant understand why someone would need a tutorial on this.

The red light is probably infra-red for the proximity sensor - it show up on some cameras when filming, but you won't see it in person

Also can you do the AEL focus trick one more time..Thanks again,,just about to purchase a Mark 1

I have the US 2.0 version already; there is no "PAL / NTSC" option.

Yes and I have XAVC S selected.

I have the following Record Settings: 60p 50M, 30p 50M, 24p 50M, and 120p 50M. Are any of those PAL types?

The name 1"-Sensor is historical. It has direct nothing to do with the real size of the sensor. The name comes from the tube in old TV-Cameras. So there is nothing comparable for a 24 x 36mm-Sensor

Ralfs Foto-Bude They should just call it a 9 mm sensor (8.8 mm X 13.2 mm) instead of scamming people with a tiny sensor. When shooters have a 50mm/1.4 lenses they never say a 2 Inch/1.4 lens. So why the switching metric to standard around? Only we, the odd ball USA, are still using standard systems. Always great to see your wonderful reviews.

***** You should look on the tire sizes. It starts out metric, then ratio and the last number jumped to standard, like for example my car: 335/35ZR17 and 245/45ZR17 "we ODD BALL USA still use standard system. last i checked its something we use to commonly communicate" not all true, we use metric systems when doing, taking or using drugs. Ask your wife, daughter or lady friend, "how many milligrams is on their birth-control pill?" It always in metric not standard number.

+Rayford Randles What is this?

here he is again.... biggest loser on youtube. so angry that he cant afford this camera so he has to bash it on every review!

RedroomStudios You must be new into photography because you can't seem to take the facts and Criticism well. Camera stores are pissed with Sony. First they sold it for $1,300.00. And so shooters purchased it at price. Then shooters just maaaaaaaaaaad. Stores are selling it for $1,000.00. This cut your profit margins. And people just purchased it for $1,300 wants a full refund. You now can't sell it as new. You, the shooter found out you got the camera less than 3 months and you can't sell it for $500.00. So really, Sony screws dealers, themselves and photographers from knocking on their door. Take for example the amateur camera body, Sony A7s, that many shooters buy and want to shoot 4K. Well, you better break your piggy bank because the ATG Gold Shogun2 or Atomos Shogun runs over $4,000.00 for a good SSD.

angelisone every new camera that comes on the market is introduced at an inflated price. there will always be buyers willing to pay more to have a new camera right away. that is their choice. we all know by now that the longer a camera is on the market, the price drops. this is the same with stereo equipment and tv's. especially people who are in the business of selling cameras know that. I know that the prices on cameras come down over time, so that's why I have waited over 1 year from the initial release to buy this cam. how old are you anyway? you sound like a whiny teenager who didnt get his way. you must have a miserable life carrying around this attitude. anyone familiar with the camera market also knows that SONY doesnt hold it's resale value as high as Canon or Nikon. I just sold my previous rig which I paid well over $2000 new for only $500 after 3.5 years. Am I mad at Sony for that? no. that is what someone was willing to pay for it. and $500 got me half way to paying for my RX10 so it's all good. no more heavy camera bag to carry around and no changing lenses. I am happy.... whereas you are a whiny little bitch. the world doesnt owe you anything.