I'm just here for the awkward vlogging section lol

Now I can flash my trash without irony.

lmaoooo

🤣 LMAOOOO 🙈

Ha ha thats so true 😂😂

😂

What? What people dislike about this camera? This camera is as good and powerful as a camera that I bought in 2011 for $2500.

@@Reachland02 at the time thecamera came out and this video came out, there was a lot of disdain in the comments and in general. I am definitely in agreement you

@@Reachland02 main letdown is the rolling shutter. other than that, this is an excellent camera

​@@01chohanbetter than to overheat , *Fuji*

I was going to say I had great video on my S10 Galaxy in 1920p 30 FPS. Tbh it looks better than this camera ...with the exception of a background blurr. Why that would be, I have no clue. Is there a camera in the $800 range that has a blurr, stabilization, and good dim light? It seems in the video, the guy had to stay still or his movement looked artificial in blurr mode.

@@derekroberts5931 I think the Canon EOS RP has dropped to that price range, but not sure if that includes the kit lens. Low-light performance of larger sensors well be far superior (it's just physics), assuming the same level of technological sophistication. If you're happy with the performance of your smartphone camera, save your money! I find using smartphone cameras frustrating, so wherever I care about quality, I opt for my APS-C DSLR (yup, I still got one of those!).

Does this still hold true today? I'm about to purchase a camera for video conferencing, webinars (live and recorded), mostly just point and shoot. Occasionally I will be out and about walking and talking as well. I'm open to any brand, want the best bang for my buck, and this seems to be the one?

@@patrickthemedicareguy I've been using this for my daily video calls for months now and I gotta say it's well worth the money.

it's not the kit lens because the kit lens can't open up to f1.8. my guess is that they used the Sony FE 50mm f1.8 lens

yes seems like same multi-i hot shoe as a7C, a1, a7S3, FX3, a9ii, a7Riv

yes the zve10 better 4k than the zv1. the zve10 would take about 3x the time of the zv1 to overheat .

it has the same terrible rolling shutter... in fact it is an a6300 in another body with some improvements and the new active stabilization... All other issues we know from a6300/a6500/a6100/a6600 are still the same since all these models are based on the old outdated technology sensor from 2015

for sure HD quality of a6000 would be better than this, since it has the same old sensor from a6300 which is good for 4K (with terrible rolling shutter) but poor in HD.

@M Tech yeah look it's not for me, but for a beginner it's an interesting camera. Not every camera can be a high end camera, there needs to be lower tiers, I think a touch screen is a better cost sacrifice than let's say a rotating screen on a vlog camera, and IBIS is another good cost saving as you can get lenses with IS.

Hmm. Good way to look at it!

beefy upgrade 💪

sigma 16mm f1.4, but this camera has bad rolling shutter not good for vlogging, better stick to zv1.

It does.

There was a Japan/China issue some time back, when it was supposed to be announced , and it all had to be postponed.

It actually leaked a few months ago. They delayed the launch at least twice.

I'm going to guess it was delayed by a combination of COVID and being sure they had secured their chip supply before allowing preorders to start.

I also wished they put the bigger battery in. The NP-FZ100 battery should only slightly increase the price, because you would only have to pay the difference in price between the NP-FZ100 battery and smaller battery. I also like the NP-FZ100 battery, because then you can use the same battery in their full frame cameras.

Yep! Sony must have manufactured a billion of those 24MP sensors; they are being used lots of their cameras!

Adding more MP won't make stuff automatically better for APS-C, just pushing pixel density, you'll mostly encounter the limitation of your optics, outcome could get worse.

It's the eternal tradeoff, MP/Pixel Size vs. ISO/Light Sensitivity/Noise. And why is 24 MP not doing it for you?

Sony has a camera that costs more than 5x as much, is popular especially among videographers and lauded for its image quality, and has a 12 Megapixel Full Frame sensor. It’s called the A7SIII.

@@TackJorrance And Sony 24Mp APS-C sensors are being used in Nikon, Pentax, Ricoh & Fujifilm cameras as well.

Hey I was just wondering what are the pros and cons for each camera, as I am looking at the a6400 or this one to buy for taking pictures and cinematography videos. Which one would you prefer?

No, even ZV-1 can't in 4K, only Nikon Z50, Z5, Z6, etc and Panasonic G100 can capture while recording in 4K!

@@Jimmyageek Thanks! Does sony document this anywhere? I'm looking at the ZV-1 and it just says may not be available in some rec modes but then does not specify what that means. I think the Nikon only records an image at the movie resolution (so 8mp for 4k) good enough I guess but the ZV-1 can record 17mp pictures while taking videoswhich I assume is the full APS-C sensor but cropped for the movie aspect ratio. Plus in auto mode it can look at the composition and take a picture while taking a video on it's own. Disappointed if it's not even offered at 1080p as that's such a "family friendly" feature. Example kids birthday party you can get video and pictures of jimmy blowing out the candles. Alternative is two cameras for photo/video or laborously going frame by frame through a video looking for an artifact free still image or.... just use the iphone which takes a movie with every picture or lets you take a picture in any video..... helpguide.sony.net/dc/1910/v1/en/contents/TP0002867870.html

No, there is a black option. But white is very convenient to avoid overheating - which I saw in another review that is a pretty severe issue...

Do you have software IS turned on in video and not still?