hjnjbbbbnbbbnnbnbnnnnnnjnnnbnnnnnnbnbnn

nnnnnn nnnnnn.n bnnnnnnnnbn9bnnnnnnnbnnn

Is it staged

@@User_Rogan_Revolution_Realm yes, the cases are real but reenacted with actors here

@@debbiehadrava204 just

Curious how he did during covid….

@@amandasutherland626 hahaha he probably vacuum sealed himself into his house.

😂😂

You can also see the ex-wife mouthing 'Really' twice as she watches him do that.

Dude, the one guy next to him reeling back as he saw how much hand sanitizer he used.

My daughter went to daycare for two years from age 3. The thing is, once kids begin to mix, they bring germs home. The same as when they go to school. Kids are germ merchants. So after she started day care, *I* started to get sick more, so the guy actually has a point. Perhaps he is worried for his job if he needs extra time off due to things he might catch from his kids. I’m self employed, but I can see how it could be an issue.

I noticed the OP was pre COVID lol. Bet their mindset changed really fast.

@@karenkelly8700 True.

As a person who actually attended daycare I hated it. It was like going to another school after school. My husband and I chose our jobs to be able to work without needing to use daycare. I understand some people have no choice but for our situation, I thought of our work schedule prior to us having kids.

@@ashleywilkes545 What does this have to do with germs? I went to daycare, too. It wasn't bad. I went in the eighties

DeAndre Jones girl not even drinking nothing 😂😂😂

@@queenb8309 exactly lol. She had me fooled for a few episodes.

That double-handed sip and nod 😅😅 i love her

I love it when the judge sips her tea! Always makes me smile!

Me too❤ It

Good thing it’s fake

Oh. My. God. I wouldn’t even wanna imagine a germ o Phoebe rn

Did you see the father when the judge was talking to us He was just behind her A few germs for kids are not a bad thing in my opinion

@@certifiedpumps232 the case itself it’s real

Probably needed therapy

Not to mention that her times will change again so then what?

I agree!

Completely agree

OP, you have no idea if they attempted to work out schedules, if anything it actually sounds like they did but it just didnt work. They could also already be at an adjusted time. THAT said, i will agree that i felt the judgement was wrong. But for one reason and one reason only. That man clearly has a rather severe personality disorder and this is something that should be taken care of by the state.

@@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 Again it doesn’t change the fact they have shared custody and evenly split the time they have with the children. During the time they are in his care if he has to utilize childcare he pays for it as it’s during his designated time and she wouldn’t be paying it. She is fully aware of how they split their time with the children. She chose to take a rotation that would affect her ability to care for the children when they were in her possession so she opted to place them in childcare. While that is her right to do during the time the children are in her custody there are two things that should not be affected by it. One of them being his time with the children, his designated time shouldn’t be affected in order to accommodate her decrease in physical time with the kids. His financial contributions also shouldn’t be affected. This is not a situation where she is the primary custodial guardian and he’s a weekend and holiday father and she has to rely on childcare to ensure she’s able to financially support them full time. I hate my ex husband, absolutely loathe him, we still have joint 50/50 custody. Neither of us received child support nor do we receive reimbursement for child care costs. We both care for the children for half of the month every month. This is an instance where the best interest of the children was not being taken into consideration or how it would effect them. I also know in the state I reside in given the shared custody she actually wouldn’t be able to place the kids in childcare without his approval as they would both have to consent to allowing the outside party access to the children. That’s something people also seem to forget, every state doesn’t default to this mindset and some are actually fairer in their rulings regarding the parents in these cases. I would actually urge him to use this ruling as proof that it would be in the children’s best interest to reside with him on a full time basis.

Exactly if she's suppose to have the kids during the day then that should be on her not him because he's still doing his part and what they agreed on

Agreed. He shouldn't cover expenses during her Tim when he has them equal time. Unfair

you know that woman needs to work, right? He has the kids during the night... they are sleeping. She is the one that does most of the work during day time. Yes, no child support... but who pays for that womans rent, her expences etc? If she works only the nightshift, so he can get his will and she takes care of the children during the day... when exactly would she have time to sleep? He wants a SAHM for his children, but didnt pay her (not the child) for staying home... doesnt work that way. Also he looks more like someone who works in an office (with his phobia etc)...so no nightshift for him... In bonus point most people dont understand: Shared Time means also shared expenses for the children for ALL activities... (Daycare, School, Hobbies) outside the home. In our country its actually the law, you have split custody 50-50 than you pay half of ALL expenses for the kid as well! Only if you havent 50-50 one pays the other child support on a monthly basis 🤣

@@felic86kaufmann57 I’m not reading all that the man not receiving help or complaining why should she

@@charlesayers3177 because split custody 50-50 means the both need to pay 50-50 for ALL the expences outside the homes.... simple. kids cost money . clothing, school supplies, medical etc. Kids cost a lot more than some rent, food and water. If you pay only child support its because you dont have 50-50 so you pay one sum for ALL cost (in- and outside the home based on your income) If HE want her to stay home, than he can pay her her earnings that she will lose OR he can shift his workshift... simple. As long as she needed to work, he needed to pay half of all cost for daycare, school-/schoolsupllies etc. If a parent not even want to pay that, than they should use a condome...simple

How do you figure that? He only has them half the time. The rest of the time they're either going to be with her or at daycare. Daycare isn't the father's time. That's her time. I actually feel bad for her doing that. She probably wanted to switch the hours and he probably refused to do so because he clearly has OCD. OCD people don't do well with change. It has to do with that they constantly try to control everything. She's going to be missing out on time with her kids. She can't be happy about that.

@@jessicaarmstrong5035 so she should pay daycare, this was very very unfair, assuming they have joint custody.

@@rayhaanalykhan bruh! by that logic, since children go to school in day time, mother should pay?

@@souraldandothi5681 that cancels out because children sleep at night

Technically you can't take a person's child away because of a mental disorder unless it is interfering with the care of a child. We don't know that it is yet with him. But the good news is that because they have shared custody the mom has the right to make choices without his permission as long as she has the judge backing her up. Which she does. I'm not massively worried about the kids unless his OCD escalates. At that point, the mom can file for full custody with him having supervised visitation. And then he'd be ordered to pay child support which is actually more than what he's paying now at only $500/month. So if he's smart he won't let it get out of hand and he'll follow what the judge says.

He might as well ask for full custody bc he has them every single night and she will barely have them when theyre in daycare if they are gonna be in daycare anyway and he is paying for it might as well have main custody instead of half and half

yeh - seems unfair as he's still doing nights - at first I thought nights would be easy as people sleep then but not with babies! - if he couldn't do nights would she pay?

AGREED

100% agree! This is the first verdict I didn’t agree with. Dad takes care of nights on hundred percent and now mom needs help with her half of the day, so why is it fair that dad has to pay for a half of the daycare she got for HER time. I would say the same thing if they had a nanny. If the nanny is only there during the day then she should be responsible, if it was a night nurse that is only there at nights, the dad should be responsible

Totally agree

Victor Hagan my thoughts exactly

Women damn near always get benefitted from child support

Exactly that shit ain't right that shit should be all on her to pay

Exactly

My husband had to pay for day care even though he was available to care for his daughter during the day and worked nights. The judge said “mom feels it would be beneficial for daughter to go to day care” so even though he already paid support, he had to pay for the child care bill as well. Keep in mind, this was “needed” because mom just wanted it. She didn’t work but would not allow my husband to have her some days.

10000% day care is horrible

It is not fair at all!!!! It is she failing to the agreement to take care of them

How is that not fair if he doesn’t want them in a daycare then maybe he should keep them through the day she works as well

She said her job doesn't allow her to stay at home during the day.... she's a doctor.... so how is it not fair?

@@candaceharmon2919 Exactly she is a doctor so she has to work during the day

He doesn’t want any daycare. He want to drop them off on his family members with strict precautions.

Yes and no. Because he could just continue to refuse to agree. But the court could order they have a month to find one they both like or something and if he doesn't agree her choice gets it lol

I agree. They are BOTH the parents and while it DOES sound like a nice daycare, the children are very young and I see his point that maybe it would be best if they stayed with family.....or he at least needs to have an equal voice in where the children go to be cared for. I went to daycare. I very much enjoyed it. We made friends there. We got the opportunity to socialize. He's not even giving this a chance. He's just judging it to be dirty and unfit without even looking at it first.

What if he had a daycare at night for the children, would she have to split it with him also? Don't seem quite right if he has them at night and he gets nothing for taking care of the kids but she gets money for daycare where she is not taking care of the kids.

Being a crazy germaphobe he'd never agree to one. Is he going to homeschooling them because schools are full of germs? Will they be forbidden from ever leaving 5he house because of germs?

jim hike That’s just it when it comes to child support. Judges have plenty of discretion and can order what they believe is in the child’s best interest. Google §154.123 of the Texas Family Code.

Support Court with Judge Vonda B. If she a doctor why can’t she paid it herself? Why could he get full custody and she pays if the father have them overnight? Why he play half if make 3x as much. Should it 30:70 or a 25:75 for pay?

CMJack Bauer Great question! Child support and custody are two different things. She being a doctor is irrelevant. Judges have discretion to do what’s in the child’s best interest and in this case, the judge believed it was fair for the parties to split the cost.

I under stand all that and i think the laws and judges lean toward punishing men. And with the big differance in income should give him some child suport so the kid has the same quality of life at both homes. As it is she has the disposable income to be the supper parent he does not. That reflects on kids as they grow up mom did everything for me took me places and bought me things dad did very little. You know that and every person that has had a divorce. She offerd to have him pay child suport but didnt offer to have her pay xhild auport to him based on her salary rather than pay the day care. How is that not favoring the woman? Im sure her xhild auport would be more than $1,000 mo.

Good thing this is a fake court case

He doesn't want to pay for childcare and it doesn't want to pay for the child then he shouldn't get to see the child

@@CJAYstonerted if he can watch the kids during the day why is he posting because she can’t watch during her allotted time that’s not his fault

@@CJAYstonerted The thing is when you have an agreement that has been working and your situation changes its the responsibility of the parent who has the changes. Cause at the end of the day he is still going to have them every night. She is getting off not having to be bothered with her own kids and getting paid for it.

@@CJAYstonerted ....STFU U SOUND STUPID AND THE PEOPLE THAT GAVE YOU A THUMBS UP

@@katinabell4464 ..... EXACTLY

Don’t be stupid.

Oh she probably has and knows that it's useless to explain it to him. People with OCD aren't rational. Their underlying issue is control. He's afraid of germs because he can't control them and can't stop his kids from getting sick. Nothing about that is rational and trying to "explain" only frustrates them and they will become more and more stubborn the more you "explain". There are components of delusion with people who have OCD. You can't talk to them until they're willing to listen to what you say.

Fmaily is always better than Daycare.

THen she should pay for DayCare you weak women.

She could not have to pay daycare by herself because her job changed her hours that is not her fault

Just because the responsibility is split in half doesn't make them only half his children... They both are still 100% responsible

@@mayiamcclain3172 ....if that's there agreement that she has them during the day and he at nights that should be all on her because that's the time she's suppose to have them he's still doing his part

She works hello

Since he has them all night and they are at daycare during the day he should have custody and she has a parenting schedule.

If she a doctor why can’t she paid it herself? Why could he get full custody and she pays if the father have them overnight? Why she he play half if make 3x as much. Should it 30:70 or a 25:75 for pay?

@@QueenTiffinee so when do she get the child again you replied as if working is a reason every body work

Tiffinee Brown well that really doesn’t answer Khy’s question, does it?

If you read the channel description, you will see that all episodes involve actors. It is a "skit" of sorts. That's why Vonda says, near the end, that comments can become scenarios on the show.

​@@lilydaquila9847ahh that makes sense thank you (new subscriber, this germaphobe at the end was terrible)

@@lisasmith8484 the cases are mostly real, they are recreated by actors.

Sounds like my situation I been dealing with child support for 4 years in GA and my son is 5. I haven't gotten a dime. Only a box of clothes and a pair of shoes yearly.

smelther Either way, they will spilt the cost of daycare.

Support Court with Judge Vonda B. That’s not fair that’s her decision to make it easier for her to go to work no one is forcing her bt she wants home to help pay for her to go to work

@@angeljosephs30 ....right i know I'm late on this but exactly if they had agreement that she watching them during the day and he has them at night why should he have to pay for it i feel like that should be on her not him because he's still doing his part if her schedule changes then she should be the only one paying daycare because that's her time when she's suppose to have the kids

@Ayahna Mangham woulbnt be saying tht if it was reverse

@Ayahna Mangham it doesn't matter why mom can't watch the children on her time. They have split custody that means each parent is responsible for the children while they are in their care. There's no child support because time is 50/50, it makes no sense for dad to pay for what the kids do on mom's time. And vice versa.

t t Unfortunately, it wouldn’t change on appeal and it didn’t.

What appeal case is this? I would like to read the appeal. If the appeals court didn't not overturn this then they are way in the wrong and every man who makes a higher income than the custodial parent can use that appeal case as precedent to reason that they should not pay a higher portion of child care expenses simply case they make more. Please give me the name of the appeals case you are referring to. Most child support always try to reason that the higher income parent should pay the most just because they make more. I really would like a case I can reference where the appeals court didn't agree that the higher income parent shouldn't pay more of the cost when they clearly made more money.

t t In Texas after a temporary orders hearing (hearings held before associate judges-Dallas county), a party can request a de novo appeal (must be requested in 3 days following the hearing), and have the temporary hearing redone. Those appeals don’t make it to the appellate courts. They are heard before the district court.

That's really not a appeal. I am referring to the appellate courts. They routinely uphold that the parent who makes the most money pays most of the cost. Most of the time its the non-custodial parent who makes the most(problaby cause they don't have the kid that much) so I don't see why a appellate court would rule in the Dr favor on this. Every noncustodial parent out there would use that ruling if they did that so I don't see a appellate court not reversing this decision. Not having this Dr pay most of the cost would open up a big can of worms.

Because of $500 you’ll try to take your kids away from their mom? Y’all really be after money and don’t care about the children’s emotions. Some people shouldn’t have kids

@@olicesa0137 ....YOU SOUND STUPID THAT'S NOT WHY BUT YOUR A WOMAN SO

@@olicesa0137 the mother shouldn’t have because she’s to busy at work.

@@fahmishaibi5063then doctors should never have kids?

@@olicesa0137 Mother should have emotions enough to take care of her own children.

When she is off work like most divorced k8ds. He shouldnt have them at all germaphobe thats going to have problems. He wants her to stay home they are not married there is the real issue

she sends them to daycare during her time now, but somehow that was still classified as her time.

I don't think she will be working daytime all of the time. I can agree now that she probably should've paid for the daycare BUT as the judge said her decision was based upon their agreement. HALF TIME=HALF THE COST.... I wonder why he didn't want her to figure out what he really should've been paying according to his 62,000 a year salary!!!😂

@@priscillalopez7480 Because the judge had her head up her butt, not 'thinking' about THIS specific case. Her female BIAS was showing...when she asked him that STUPID question, he should have said SURE let's based child support on the WIFE'S salary honestly because HE really has custody....if the kids are in daycare during the day and SLEEP at his house....how the F would HE pay 'her' child support? The judge's head was up her butt forgetting the facts of THIS case, simply ASSuming a more 'traditional' scenario where sbe could squeeze a non-custodial Dad. In FAIRNESS if they have shared custody and either parent wants to get a Babysitter during THEIR TIME, it should be their responsibility and their bill NOT a shared responsibility.

@@geminieric1662 The judge had the idiotic Tx law in front of her. Equal time Equal pay. If he wants to fight it he should takes it to the court that will change their custodial agreement since she makes more money than him he should get a 60-40 or 70-30..... I think that she should pay more if she makes more. BOTTOM LINE IS he didn't REALLY care who watched then during her time he just wants it to be free.

She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.

No she wasn't. They split the time 50/50 so they split the expenses 50/50. End of discussion.

@@jessicaarmstrong5035 She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.

@@jessicaarmstrong5035 yeah read my other comment too, but I he gets a "night care" during the night, they should also split that. How crazy

@rayhaanalykhan that's not how it works in shared custody. Each parent spends what it takes for everyday living when the kids are with them and any expenses are paid 50/50. What your income level is plays no part in shared custody because you're obviously spending more than if it was a custodial/non-custodial arrangement. I think you misunderstand how shared custody works.

@@jessicaarmstrong5035 please watch other videos of this judge I’ve seen in Atleast one case that even though it was shared custody judge awarded child support to the parent making less amount. Although it’s was not full, I think it she calculated both of their child support then subtracted them, the amount that came was awarded to the parent making less.

You’re very welcome!🤗

Yup...what a crap actor 😆 🤣

He isnt paying any CS

Jesse Grider because they split.

She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.

@@rayhaanalykhan I spent 20 years as a single dad raising my 3 sons. Courts are able to just bend over backwards for women. Finally at about year 15, the court finally woke up to what shes been doing over the years and put the protective order in place with her only having supervised visits. She eventually didnt even do her visitations. Luckily I had custody. Plenty of crap stories over the years.

@@rushfan9thcmd Did you get child support?

@@rayhaanalykhan barely and not at all. She originally only had to pay 70 a week for all 3 but got over 4000 behind and they began confiscating her tax returns. Then she quit working the court bent over backwards for her and wouldnt find her in contempt. In about the 15th year when i took her to court for violating a court order, we got the court to put the order of protection in temporary and she no showed the following hearings for 9 months. They even were allowing her to just call in. I was at each hearing date for 9 months. The last one they even tried calling her and she wouldnt answer. The court reluctantly made the OP permanent. The last 3 years she didnt have any visitation. Its absolutely amazing watching the courts leniency toward women, not just my ex. I saw the judge tell a guy one day that if he didnt have this certain amount of support paid by the next month, the guy was going to jail. The judge told the guy that he didnt care if the guy had to sell everything and live in a tent. I dont know what happened to that guy. I filed for divorce the day after learning of her plan to lie to police to get me arrested. I called the lawyer first thing that next day. I struck first.

I mean if you watch the end his behavior is almost alarming, sure maybe they just wanted to do a bit so they told him to do something funny, but if that was true emotion it’s startling. People battling a fear of germs irrationally must really take a tole on one’s life, I imagine it to be near impossible to form deep meaningful connections and build many relationships with people due to being terrified of what they may carry….it was a bit my bad lol

Not necessarily.

@@JudgeVondaB you’re just petty sometimes.

​@@miekaash6831no. She's following the laws of the Texas courts. Child support and custody is such a tangled mess to figure out that going by the books usually the best way to do it. With her being a Dr, they would be in and out of court every time the hospital puts her on a different rotation getting child support amended. Everyone is so quick to judge, but not think about the reasons behind a decision. You can't make decisions in court based on your feelings. They have a custody agreement in place. Regardless of how much time she is spending with them during her "time" with them, the agreement has to legally be followed. So unless he wants to fight for sole custody and hit her for child support, then the law has to be followed. Sometimes it just sucks.

She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.

@@juliestrickland7754 This is not feelings, this is just pure logic.

Buddy with the hand sanitizer is funny

Wait the ex wife saying stop..and the look that other dude gave buddy priceless.

Well, this was from two years ago 👀👀

you do know these are all actors right? they are only replaying what actually took place in a court case

That daycare amount sounds reasonable, split is fair. He needs to go to therapy for his "germophobia"

My daughter paid that amount for after school daycare, 4 hours per day. I retired abd am now able to provide. So expensive!

Exactly

I was thinking the same thing. First off your not saving lives everyday. Your helping lives everyday big difference. Also most doctors are legalized drug dealers imo

😂😂😂😂

That's awfully self-deprecating. Maybe you should talk to a therapist. You shouldn't put yourself down. Maybe you don't save lives EVERY day but that doesn't make what healthcare professionals do less important. Don't devalue yourself. You're important and you do an important job.

EXACTLY! She's not spending any time with the kids. If the roles were reversed she would NOT have made her pay anything because she would have claimed it would negatively impact her standard of living and quality of life. The judges don't even see how gender bias they are against men.

Oh, I missed that.. did they say what her salary was?

I agree.

There are 24 jours in a day 12 hours each work is 8 hours. They have already been to court. Dont think the dad would win in child custody cases germaphobe dont normally win. They lack ablity to completely care for kids. 1 ablity to leave the house emergency happen hed call her. 2 teaching then to be afraid of the outside because of his fears. Ehen they get to school age he will not retain custody.

Plus he doesn't want full custody. Why should he file for sole custody? So he can have one of his relatives watch them for the time that they would've been at daycare. Plus I don't think that the mom will be working days for long. It sounds like she's an on call doctor or an ER doctor.

Has all the overnights.

Women give birth early. Couples adopt children. Couples have surrogates. Those are possibilities.

Support Court with Judge Vonda B. Thank you

Also it could be like 2 1/2 years they didn’t specify -

Little Angel It really depends on the judge. Not all judges are the same. Not all laws are the same.

His right as a guardian? He’s the parent.🤔

@@JudgeVondaB exactly. And now he’s being forced to pay for something he as a parent doesn’t want his children involved in.

Force him to pay for something he did not want...🤔

Yes the childcare for her to work

A'Lay Solace As a parent, we are all tasked with doing things “we don’t want to do” but it’s what’s in the best interest of the child(ren) that matters.😊

Support Court with Judge Vonda B. That’s understandable and in the past I have agreed with every other ruling your honor! This was the only case that made me go 🤔 Oh and thank you for responding I feel special lol

A'Lay Solace - It seems that he wasn’t working with the Mother in a resolution, obviously her work situation had changed. He could of arrived at court with a child care resolution. But he didn’t offer any real resolution and was being obstinate. However it seems that the cost of the day care should be the same for both if the Mother makes triple what he makes. Shouldn’t there have been an offset to determine how much each would pay. Calculate what the child support amount would have been for each parent, then subtracted the difference between the two? I believe based on this the Mother would have been paying the child care bill.

Kofi Abu Anything less than half would be unfair. Also, this is what happens when Agreements aren’t put in a court order from the beginning.

He shouldn't be paying NOTHING! HER schedule time changed not HIS!!!!

Liza Gladue I feel you!!! I only say a small percentage because they not letting a man get away without paying anything...if he was here in Florida buddy would be paying 100% like I do...(it’s all unfair)

Support Court with Judge Vonda B. I disagree with you but you’re still so SEXY!!!

Is it for real tho 😳