GO TO ANOTHER BAKERY THEN.

Yes!!! Yes!!! Leave that baker alone. He has rights too.

He did not refuse to serve this gay couple. He did not turn them away or make them leave the store. He was more than willing to make them a cake, just not a cake decorated so as to celebrate homosexuality, because his religious principle will not allow him to do such a thing. When the U.S. Supreme court tries to force an individual to celebrate something which he or she considers an inherant sin and even force him or her put it in writing, disavoying their god and all that they believe in, in the name of something sinister, then we are all in trouble. This country is in big big trouble.

Don't ask someone to participate in a celebration they find immoral ... and Don't sue them if they refuse.

i'm gay and i think the court was right. this would be insane if it was in favor of the couple. just get another baker lol. freedom is a wonderful thing only when it applies to everyone.

GOSH!!! I can't believe people go to court for a wedding cake. If a baker doesn't want to make your wedding cake, just find another one that is willing to do so. Why do you need to force someone to provide you a service??

He was exercising his baker's rights. The right not to bake. 😊🍥

Great!!! After all, this Baker offered to bake anything else except a wedding cake. There was no discrimination towards the couple only toward the baker.

It’s about time we support freedom of speech.

"Narrow ruling"??? No wonder why your rating are dropping.

7-2 is not very narrow ruling! Liberals try to minimize the magnitude of this victory for religious freedom!

Good. Because he never refused them service at any time and never asked them to leave. They took it upon themselves to bash this conservative Christian because he wouldn't create a wedding cake for their wedding. They should be ashamed and be liable for his legal fees.

Finally, common sense prevails! If they didn't like the baker, then find another bakery. This nation is founded under God and the baker's 1st Amendment rights were definitely violated. It's his business. For instance, if he doesn't want to serve someone b/c he hates their purple hair, then that should be his right to refuse ANYONE service.

LGBTQMCsquared Alphabet mob:0 Freedom:1

But doesn't that bakery have the right to refuse service?

Narrow ruling?!!!? . You can't fool everyone. Unanimous ruling! 👏👏👏

7-2 is not narrow, only a narrow mind would say that and not corrected, two narrow minds

I don’t let people that don’t like me fix my food. Call me crazy.

If someone tried to force me to make a cake for them against my will, I'll take a big steaming dump in the batter.

As a Liberal, he has a right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of expression. I couldn't believe this incident made National headlines. The gay couple should've gone elsewhere as I pretty sure many bakeries would've created a wedding cake for them. Instead they took the guy, his family and business to court. It should've been thrown out immediately. The gay couple, Jack's family and business all received unwanted attention, media coverage and threats from both sides. Its simple. If a business denies you for whatever reason, go somewhere else.

SUPREME COURT: FINALLY GOT IT RIGHT. AND I LOVE THIS BAKER GOD BLESS YOU.

Great day for America

Now he needs to bring them and state of Colorado to court for money lost only fair .make it a huge sum and teach them a lesson

Praise the Lord !!!

I agree with the free market comments. I can’t imagine why someone would even eat a cake from a bakery that does not wish to make it. Love is always the secret ingredient, and if it is not added to the recipe, I can’t imagine the finished product would taste very good.

This is a great victory for all of us

I wonder if a Muslim baker would be in trouble if he refused to make a cake mfor a gay couple ?

I praise the supreme courts decision. The state of Colorado came at him aggressively and so did the civil Rights committee. They open had disdain for the baker who politely refused to endorse their practice. This goes beyond public service. This is about principle and I am glad that both the liberals and conservatives could agree that forcing this man to comply to this state law was unconstitutional and ant-religious in nature. Congratulations Philips.

Freedom of religion!!

I am amazed that they came up with the correct answer!

Maybe I don't understand this situation but I think I would want a baker who got me, my vision and would be completely into creating my dream cake. Sometimes you have to shop around to get the best person for the job.

The argument should be about the fact that forcing someone to do work for someone, no matter what group they say they define themselves by, is called slavery!

thank you God, that this country hasn't lost its moral grounds in such a way that it infringes on religious liberty!

So my understanding is that certain people in this country believe that they have the right to choose whom to buy from, but no-one has the right to choose whom to sell to.

We have here a gay couple who is trying to be the biggest bullies on the block. Every one hates bullies. especialy when they are trying to be validated by the courts of law.

The major media outlets are saying this is a narrow ruling. How is 7-2 narrow?

I demand a Jewish baker make me a cake shaped like a swastika!

“We (gay) Christians are being judged”! Nope, sorry. You have already been judged. The word of God has already given you the consequence of your sin.

God bless this man for upholding the truth of the Christian faith.

On another note: his baked goods are beautifull. He is so talented! 🍰

I hoped he would file a counter lawsuit for the damages incurred AMEN!

cbs, PLEASE EXPLAIN how a 5-2 ruling, is a NARROW ruling ?

Most Americans, Democrats and Republicans, agree with this baker. Good for religious freedom

EVEN MY BEAUTIFUL GAY DAUGHTER KNEW THE GAY COMMUNITY WAS GOING AFTER CHRISTIAN OWNED BUSINESSES !... EQUALITY FOR ALL UNDER OUR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW !🙋🙋🙋🙋

It was more than what is said here....it talked about exceptions for religious freedom !!!

if u forced someone to make any kind of food, couldn't they spit in it?

So basically the state mishandled the case and that’s why they ruled in bakers favor. Makes sense.

Excellent, Thank you LORD GOD ALMIGHTY for guiding Our SC, A Good day for America indeed!!! MAGA💜🌈🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Good. Per the 1st amendment, local governments cannot compel a citizen to speech or association.

CBS news how is a 7-2 vote "narrow"???

Thank God.

Glad the Court made the right decision. Anybody know if the baker's business is still doing well?

he can put a sign that says we bake cakes that practice our Christian beliefs and rights or values

Trump is going to put two or three more judges for people who believe in the Constitution:-)

Well done , you stood by your beliefs and were villified

Two justices do not value freedom.

Oh well, I guess they'll have to get their cake else where... Big Flippin deal

Spot on...the Court did good! And now, the baker can sue the State over religious bias!!!!! Love it!

I'm going to get in on this one early to try to limit the number of posts complaining that 7-2 is not a narrow decision (my favorite of these including the fake news hashtag). I am no legal scholar, but I do know that the word narrow here refers to the scope and applicability of the decision, not the margin. Please consider this before posting. Thank you in advance.

Personally, I would not want to force someone who obviously doesn't like me to work for me. If a baker won't make a cake for my fiance and I, we would go somewhere else. But I hope this baker is aware that his homophobia is well know and could negatively affect his business.

*SUPREME COURT RULES PEOPLE DEMANDING TOLERANCE ARE INTOLERANT*

Thank you for standing up for your religious beliefs.

Wonderful.

Take out the variable of religious protection and the even deeper, wider problem is that the consumer, backed by coercive gov, is now forcing businesses to make certain products or provide certain services. Gov regulation of business is presumably about enforcing safe practices, products and services for the public at large regarding those products and services the business owner CHOOSES to make, provide and sell. The regulatory arm of gov quickly becomes heavy-handed and broadly punitive. So that has been a problem in our not-free market for decades. But this baker offered the customers to buy what he currently sells. They refused and dictated to him what he should make and the fake enforcement group called a “commission” issued its dictates and destroyed this man’s business. There are so many deviations from American culture, our Const, Nat Law, free enterprise principles in these coercive transformations of business practice. Protecting religious expression is only one. If we permit continued gov coercion and overreach such as these gay wedding cake cases begin to reveal, soon gay wedding cake bakers and many others will also be forced to make what they choose not to provide in their business. We are confusing the public sphere with the private and will destroy all that is private in the process. Guess who wins then?

Good about time we had a bit of sanity back in the states.🙌🙌

The baker NEVER refused service to the gay couple, he refused to make a specialty cake. The couple couple have brought any already made product in the shop.

Happy day

We're using the word "art" a bit too loosely here lol

thanks for exposing this!

I am learning something new everyday. Thank.

may God continue to bless your business Mr baker 👍

Am I the only one who noticed his last name is “Shapiro”?

I really don’t get it, if people have such a problem with the bakers beliefs, don’t go there!

Can I just say how cutee those cookies are ...

What the gay couple did was just plain stupid. They drove to Colorado as a way to gain access to more money. And that was even a waste of gas. Public bus companies are government owned. Trash haulers are government owned. But Jack's Cake shop is not.

Someone tell me how many time they watched that rose being made

Funny how certain characters want “TOLERANCE” yet they show no tolerance except their own SELFISH views. Personally I start to change my views, due to such actions that lack common sense.

Finally some Justice

What are these two fudge packers going to do now that their 15 minutes of fame are over? They must be really sad.

They dont mean narrow as in the ruling be close. They mean the written decisions from the justices werent very broad and was concise. I'm pretty sure. The person they had on was informative and educational.

KING JESUS IS LORD ❤🙏🙌 Christians love gays by telling them the truth so they can be save and have eternal life.

Leviticus 20 :13, gays, Leviticus 20:13, you can't hide

But can he make frosting roses?

A civilised ruling,here here....at last

🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋 THANK YOU JESUS ! 🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋

Impressive video recording

Fking cake again. Buy a box of Duncan Hines and make your own freaking cake. Sheez.

Freedom prevails! Wonderful!

Freedom wins, tyranny takes an L.

Common sense tells me.....use Yelp and find another baker.🙄

Honestly I find it stupid and annoying that this couple tried to sue. The baker was absolutely right, I'm glad he won. However, would they even be able to call it a win if the court had ruled in their favor? I mean, you can't force someone to approve of what you're doing, or to like you, or to accept anything.. So IF they had won, and it forced all bakers and private companies to create cakes or produce products for you against their own free will, morals, and beliefs, are you even sure you would even WANT the service? I mean.. what if some devious people (not this guy in particular - of course) decided to spit in your cake, compromise, or sabotage your product in some kind of way? You'd never know! I would be terrified honestly.. And although it's illegal to do so, some people are pretty crafty I mean it could be made out to look like a mistake. And this type of thing could happen ALL THE TIME! That's a lose lose situation to me. So you ought to be glad they lost this case just saying..

Man you got no idea what I'm saying . Dig into your head and count the possibilities. Thanks..

What could be the point? 3 guesses. Get a free donut

Yeah this guy didn't deserve this much ridicule. Good for you, and thank you supreme court!

God smacks it out of the ball park. Jesus Christ Is Lord! 😍

GOD BLESS those people and their business !!!!!!! we are so praud of them and Jesus praud of you, for you put your religion ahead of your business!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a waste of time and money...let them pack fudge.

Who needs a ring? Why? Honest question

Alien/ thanks for the correction . My point is Gov can't tell me what to bake. Rather crude analogy but the point is..don't cram crap down throats. Sorry if you are offended. Thanks again.

Justice is served, delicious as the cakes the Colorado baker can now make unobstructed by the renegade dismal state of Colorado. 7-2..