Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD lens review with samples

Рет қаралды 120,293

3 жыл бұрын

It's not very often that an /interesting/ new superzoom lens gets released but this new option from Tamron promises good image quality and a brighter maximum aperture than usual. Can it really deliver?
Find the lens here (Amazon affiliate link):
geni.us/tamron28200
Support this channel on Patreon, for all kinds of exclusive bonus content! / christopherfrost
All pictures taken by me on a Sony a7R II camera.
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonEOSR5Body
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonEFtoRF
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma50mm14Art
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonRF35mm18Macro
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/MarumiFitSlim77
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020USBPlusMic
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSmartLavalierPlus
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC3MicAdaptor
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1nMiniRecorder
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMini2FlyMore
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...

Пікірлер: 181

@shang-hsienyang1284 3 жыл бұрын

This is my favorite lens on any system for all time. The compromises between focal length range, aperture, sharpness, AF speed, size, weight, ergonomics, and cost is absolutely amazing. I have taken so many great photos with this lens.

@johnzhengphotographychannel 3 жыл бұрын

This is an impressive lens. I sold it after using it for a few months, but I regretted it a few months later, because when I checked my photo album, I found that more than half of the good photos were taken by it. Yes, I bought one again. After this time, I feel the value of this lens even more!

@srijonmondal8842 3 жыл бұрын

To me it's a ground breaking lenses. It super versatile and I hope Sigma and Sony soon makes glasses inspired for this.

@jolyoncox 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Chris. That chart showing maximum aperture at each focal length was really helpful. Not enough reviewers do that imo. Thanks for another great review.

@SiLBERRABEN 3 жыл бұрын

Great review and thank you so much for making it! I've used both this lense and the older tamron superzoom lense 16-300mm for aps-c cameras, and the image quality of the newer one for sony is way better and really satisfying. It may be the best option ever for travel photography.

@sephiroth127 3 жыл бұрын

The review we've been all waiting for. Thanks!

@andreasbuder4417 3 жыл бұрын

FINALLY! This Tamron is actually the first superzoom ever, that rivals the venerable Olympus 12-100mm mft superzoom in optical quality. But now in full frame with a brighter aperture. Toss in the 18mm 2.8 and 45mm 1.8 Samyangs, and you have an affordable killer travel kit!

@dougkelly8956 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I have the 12-100 and always considered it the type of lens that can cause you to buy into a system. The availability of the 28-200 is causing me to very probably make the switch to Sony. An A7C +28-200 is basically no bigger than an E-M1.2 + 12-100

@seangray4512 2 жыл бұрын

@@dougkelly8956 I too have the Olympus 12-100 along with heaps of other Oly glass etc, Just bought my first full frame camera the other month (A7III) going cheap now the A7IV is out. That extra bokeh you get from full frame is great & also the recovery of details in low light shots is awesome too! Love my E-M1mk2 with the 40-150 & tc2.0 for birds & Sony for night shots & bokeh! cheers

@Kunal0915 Жыл бұрын

@@dougkelly8956although the ergonomics are much better on the Olly than the Sony A7C.

@thomasanderson5929 2 ай бұрын

@@dougkelly8956 Did you ever switch to Sony and ditch the Olympus 12-100mm? If so, how has it been? Do you miss the Olympus?

@thomasanderson5929 2 ай бұрын

@@seangray4512 Do you still use the Olympus 12-100mm or have you gone all in on the full frame and ditched the Olympus? If so, how has the Tamron lens been?

@henri.witteveen 3 жыл бұрын

I have been using this lens for a few months now on my Sony A7Riii and I really love it. I use it quite a lot as a walk around lens, most of the time during daylight hours. When using it in low light in the evening I use it with my camera on a tripod. The wide zoom range makes it quite a versatile lens.

@HappyHubris 3 жыл бұрын

Whew I've been waiting on this review since the 28-200's release! From personal experience it has the versatility of the APSC 18-135mm lenses with much better light gathering and sharpness. My only ding is that Tamron didn't make this a stabilized lens, as sometimes you need to crank that ISO up at 200mm to get sharp images at high MP.

@srijonmondal8842 3 жыл бұрын

I was waiting for it too and Indeed we miss the stabilization. But it makes the lens significantly lighter. Tamron 17-70mm APSC is heavy for the same reason.

@TheThinFrame 3 жыл бұрын

I set up automatically the shutter speed at 1/250 and everything is crazy sharp outdoors

@godsinbox 3 жыл бұрын

@@TheThinFrame if only the shutter speed could be auto variable with focal length. doesnt seem like it would be too hard if sony put effort into it.

@hardywoodaway9912 Жыл бұрын

@@godsinbox it is…

@kevenspargo6829 Жыл бұрын

@@godsinbox This feature is already provided in many Sony cameras.

@coreyshaw7695 3 жыл бұрын

i’ve always wanted to see a review from you on this lens with its versatile zoom range 😁

@momchilyordanov8190 3 жыл бұрын

I use this lens for about 9 months now. It's a great lens. In real life use I cannot see any softness. The only problems I have is missed focus in AF-S. For some reason it's more reliable in AF-C mode. I use it on 7R III. I'm very happy with it and haven't had a lens change since the summer of 2020 lol

@theclifbar 8 ай бұрын

Love your post! "haven't had a lens change since the summer of 2020 lol" literally made me laugh out loud.

@MMxx694 Ай бұрын

In the same boat, 2 months since a lens change. 😂

@daniel635biturbo 3 жыл бұрын

That is a pretty impressive result ! I've got the sibling 28-75, Tamron are really leading in a good direction, compact, light and good image quality, really good compromise.

@edc641 2 жыл бұрын

I'm so happy I bought this lens. Now I'm just waiting for the review on the Tamron 17-28. Yes, I've seen/read all reviews on it but I'm waiting for this man to give his opinion.

@sanjayroychowdhury7091 3 жыл бұрын

Lot's of Love from India kolkata WestBengal... your testing review are the best... Keep up the good work.. Just awsome brother..

@dch2896 3 жыл бұрын

Loving your reviews! Keep it up bud!

@maximpowers1 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you Chris, good rev as allways :)

@josegulias 3 жыл бұрын

loving this lens from the release!!

@IcanCwhatUsay 2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely wonderful review! Thank you very much!

@uosocal 2 жыл бұрын

The absolute best review videos. Thank you

@venkateshmuthuramamoorthy1091 5 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for your perfect analysis Chris.

@chryseass.5143 2 жыл бұрын

I bought it and it is a great companion on the A7C.I have been very impressed and a bit shocked at what it is capable of. I will have no qualms about taking it on holiday along with the Tamron 17-28 and a small fast prime for lowlight situations.

@oguzbenice7423 3 жыл бұрын

Good review as usual. After the latest firmware no focus problem. I have 5 lenses and this lens is the one I use most. Excellent lens for travel, landscape and street photography.

@Syd0618 3 жыл бұрын

hi, do you think it works for sports too ? like ice skate ballet ? where the light is very poor ?? I want Sony 70-200 F 2.8 but its extremely expensive.

@oguzbenice7423 3 жыл бұрын

@@Syd0618 No. This lens is not suitable for fast moving objects.

@turbochargedtransit7241 3 жыл бұрын

As a railroad photographer who needs good zooms, and this is the best lens I have ever put on my A7iii. It really is the greatest superzoom lens on the market, by a longshot!

@ikemadethis894 3 жыл бұрын

I have this lens and love it. I have the tamron 28-75 f2.8 and I’m going to sell it. I was able to just barely resolve saturns rings with this lens at At 200 mm on my a7riii. The fact that this is bright at 28 mm makes it all the more versatile.

@inuit2winit 2 жыл бұрын

An A7R body with this lens seems like a great travel option amazing potential to go from fairly wide to super zoomed in with enough sharpness to crop generously. I was on the verge of actually buying that exact setup, but the lack of OIS really put me off for the way I shoot

@claudenis12 Жыл бұрын

hey, thank you for your review.....i was planning to buy this lens but just because you did a great review and seeng where the F2.8 is changing (at 31mm) i just realized that this lens is not for my needs. without you I was so close to spend money for somthing that is not good for me. Thank you again Christopher, great job!

@anandaabey7237 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Chris. Great video.

@Litotes_89 3 жыл бұрын

Great video Chris!

@dedmonds66 2 жыл бұрын

I bought this one having looked at your review and couldn't be happier. Thanks so much. Wondering what your thoughts on the Tamron 17-28 f 2.8 for Sony FE might be. Keep up the inspired work.

@Karim.Adwan03 3 жыл бұрын

Just thankk uu mann for everything you do for us👏👏❤

@antonsiberian 3 жыл бұрын

I have this lens, it's nice and sharp. And it has nice semi-macro capabilities. So it's quite unique lens and has great value.

@user-bp8yg3ko1r 3 жыл бұрын

I love your reviews! ^^

@danpetreikis 3 жыл бұрын

Tamron and Sigma have really been killing it with their newer lens designs.

@dima1353 3 жыл бұрын

So well balanced lens !

@cohoonatube 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent content as always! Well done. This lens is tipping the scale of my system selection. Like many I'm looking seriously at the Sony A7RIII, R6, and X-T4. Having sold all my Nikon dslr kit while it had value I've been sitting on the sidelines waiting for a good direction. Curious of your personal thoughts concerning the A7RIII vs. R6? This is for capturing life with my 6 children as well as serious photography which we all do as a family (landscape etc.). Thanks Brother (love your library selections) :D.

@m_waz7945 3 жыл бұрын

This actually might be the ticket for me as an Sony apsc shooter. I imagine quite a few people already have the sigma 16 1.4 for wide angle, and this would cover just about everything else while offering a bit more on the telephoto side for those random bird opportunities than an 18-135. Would love to see this retested on an apsc to see if the image quality holds up as well as it did here

@hardywoodaway9912 Жыл бұрын

it does hold up and definitely is a nicer option than the 18-135, especially when you want to switch to ff but n the future

@1717jbs 3 жыл бұрын

good stuff Chris!

@wilismatrix9847 2 жыл бұрын

me watching the other video is sony 24-240mm side by side with this one to compare the quality ! definitely the tamron is better and the 4mm difference is not a big issue couple steps behind will fix it. Thank you for this review

@thehuntingparadox2291 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for at least having a short clip of you actually zooming in on something at a distance during a review of a zoom lense not just zooming in on something indoors Lol. I have been looking for videos that have it, not many do. Thank you Thank you thank you!

@brucerofL 3 жыл бұрын

Used it on my a7r4. No complaints.

@OccultDemonCassette 3 жыл бұрын

This lens is an amazing value.

@donaldgreen6361 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for another great review. I have the Tamron 17-28mm which I think is a great lens, and the Tamron 28-75mm which is only OK. Is there any chance that you could compare the Tamron 28-75 against the 28-200? I do mainly landscape work, so the extra zoom is far more important than the wider aperture.

@scrptwic 3 жыл бұрын

Chris I have the older copy and use it almost daily I have the 3.8- 5.6 great lens even though I use it on my APS-C cameras. I normally shoot at F6.5 OR F-11

@fengshuischoolindonesia6161 3 жыл бұрын

Your excellent explanation causes me to buy one ............ thanks christ

@ryanbeer5262 3 жыл бұрын

Wow, impressive. Would be nice paired with the 20 f2.

@Callmeodysseus 3 жыл бұрын

Hi Chris! Does the 'Lock' switch on the lens only lock the zoom ring closed at 28mm? Or can you lock it at any focal length to avoid the zoom creep you mentioned?

@bikemanrockfan 3 жыл бұрын

Only locks at 28mm

@senseofeverthing 2 жыл бұрын

I really like your reviews! But how about doing another test where the pictures are taken over further distance? I know that this would add some work, but ist would show the performance for landscape photographers. P.S.: It would be cool if you could find time for the Nikon Z 24-200 sometime. I am considering which system would suit me best and superzooms are very interesting for travel.

@Syd0618 3 жыл бұрын

Hi good review. Do you think it works for sports too ? like ice skate ballet ? where the light is very poor ?? I want Sony 70-200 F 2.8 but its extremely expensive.

@JorgeMorenoCGArtist 3 жыл бұрын

Hi. Good review. I want this zoom, is very unique

@albedo0point39 3 жыл бұрын

You should wait for the a7r3a to come out, Christopher. Looks like a nice revision to the rear screen resolution.

@giannispapap119 2 жыл бұрын

Hello sir.Can you tell me if the zoom ring ia a little bit stiff? Because i just bought it and it is hard to rotate the zoom ring.thank you.

@Rollergold4 3 жыл бұрын

Great review as always, nice to see a super zoom that doesnt sick. Great for A7 users and even R2 and 3 owners. Also nice to see that A7R2 being upgraded, but (aside from price) do you think it would be better to go for the R4 instead for testing lenses with its 61mp resolution and its 26mp APS-C mode could do the job of both the R2 and the A5100 in 1 body.

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

Nah, I love the 42mp sensor of my new a7R III because it's perfect for lens testing. 61mp is too far away from Sony's 24mp cameras to be useful to people who own those (and there are many), and 42mp is roughly in line with the 45mp cameras I use for testing Nikon and Canon equipment :-) you do make a good point about shooting in APS-C mode though

@nlpix1 2 жыл бұрын

my first experience with the tamron rxd serie lenses was disappointing (28-75 f2.8 and 20mm 2.8) mainly because of the distortion. Also my experience with tamron super zooms for the A mount is that Tamron has unacceptable distortion. But with this 28-200 distortion is very good controlled, and overall it performs much better than my sony 24-240. and 40% less weight as a bonus. I think for many photographers this is the only lens you will ever need. What really is missing is a focus hold / manual fucus button on the lens, as the one on the camera is not very ergonomically in use.

@beinfocus7765 3 жыл бұрын

hi, does the in camera correction work well with 3rd party lenses? or we should turn it off?

@danieljamescooke802 Жыл бұрын

Could you tell me the name of that jingle music which is playing in that short little end sequence at around 10'00" in this video, thanks!

@charruaporelmundo 2 жыл бұрын

Would you take this instead of the old sony 70-200 f4? the one recenttly reviewed by you? thnaks

@bozmundarts2614 3 жыл бұрын

ngl, it'd be sweet if you got the chance to try the sony g master 35mm 1.4... it truly is a dream lens (not so much for videographers maybe due to focus breathing?) size, sharpness, focus speed, overall my favorite lens ever. personally speaking... i'd get the 85mm gm but it's not so fast focusing and size makes it quite a deal breaker, the sigma 85mm dg dn sounds and looks so much more attractive and i'll probably fall in love with it ^^ (if i didnt care for weather sealing the sony 85 1.8 would do much more than well enough for me)

@candidonthestreetanupamgos5283 3 жыл бұрын

Hello. Need your suggestions. Among TTartisans 50mm F1.2, the 7Artisans 55mm f1.4 and Viltrox 56mm f1.4 which one is best for sharpness, chromatic aberration/fringing and Bokeh?? I'm not concerned with autofocus?? If anyone of the first two are better for image quality I can ignore autofocus of the Viltrox. Please share your ideas or make a comparative video about these three. All these three lenses are similarly priced. But if image quality is similar the Viltrox seems to be a better buy as it has autofocus. Looking for a budget portrait lens

@JamisonMichael 3 жыл бұрын

I just switched over from canon to Sony. This was the first lens i bought....it was too convenient for the price...28-200mm? EASY Decision

@annawojciechowska8582 2 жыл бұрын

Is it better to buy a Sony 18-105 lens or a Tamron 28-200 for the alpha6000? I know that the tamron has a bigger "shot" but I wonder which one takes better photos at the focal lengths I use most often, around 16-28 and 50-100. I also have a kit for the sony 16-50 and 55-210. I would like to have one lens for everything :)

@Fifey 3 жыл бұрын

can u test that new sony 14mm F/1.8 at some point in the future?

@dinbali 3 жыл бұрын

I can't find the sony 20mm f 1.8 G on your channel

@gerthezsgerthezs213 Жыл бұрын

❤Great! 👍

@marknathan7744 7 ай бұрын

would love to see you test this on a crop sensor aswell.

@karantandon6755 3 жыл бұрын

that magnitude of focal range!!!!!

@HappyHubris 3 жыл бұрын

More to the point, that magnitude of focal range without the awful optics of traditional superzooms. Sure there are compromises, but it beats the pants off the Sony/Nikon/Canon superzooms in resolution and/or light gathering.

@Reevesy791 2 жыл бұрын

Would this lens be okay for portraits with a Sony A7riii ?

@onthemove301 27 күн бұрын

After watching this review I bought the lens. I also own the Sony 70-200 F4 G mk2. It is really hard to see any difference in sharpness or contrast between the two lenses, and stabilisation with the Tamron is very similar, even though the Tamron doesn't have internal stabilisation.

@RM-ud2cm Жыл бұрын

can you review some MFT lenses? like the Olympus 12-100mm f4.0.

@zhuoranhan3518 3 жыл бұрын

"I'm updating to a7r3 soon as many people have requested" lol, why not the newest model a7r4 or even a1? You are one of the best reviewers, dude! Get the best camera!

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

I don't want the a7rIV because I want to continue testing lenses at the 42mp/45mp resolution. It means by tests can be a little more comparable across camera systems

@geerthasevoets48 Жыл бұрын

Hi, I like your reviews. Clear, trustfull en to the point. I keep struggling with a choice between the Tamrom 28-200 and the Sony 24-105. I like to shoot nature, animals in nature, portraits and all kind of events. I shoot almost always in good light conditions. If you, as a photographer with such a profile, have to choose between those lenses, witch one should you choose? And if picture quality is important? The price isn’t a big deal here in Belgium, with the current cashback on the Sony lenses the difference is more or less 200 dollar. Geert

@iShootWild Жыл бұрын

Tamron 28-200mm is better. Check Manny Ortiz's review video. He explains why this lens is better than the Sony 24-105mm.

@martin9410 Жыл бұрын

I think for event photography the Sony lens will be better because it's a native mount and will shoot from frames per second.

@TrampledReed 3 жыл бұрын

I have this bought. No regret at all. I have it side by side to the 28-75. Honestly, you are not going to notice the difference at 28mm. At other focal length, the main difference is the aperture. The long end alone is better than the Sony 70-300 in the overlapping focal length! And if large aperture is not a priority, it is only marginally worse than the tamron 70-180 (which I also have). The convenience makes me shoot more photos I normally would have missed. This lens has given me more keepers than my 70-180 for that reason alone, despite the marginally worse performance. The only thing I miss on the 70-180 when I don’t bring it is the low light performance on the tele end

@adamg.manning6088 3 жыл бұрын

I just bought this as my first lens for Sony. I hope it’s good...

@LuigiVN 3 жыл бұрын

All the previous Tamron super zooms crawled sickly so this one could walk and even run gracefully.

@hardywoodaway9912 2 жыл бұрын

have this lens till its release, used it on the a7riv and on apsc. it would be better with Image stabilization, other than that it’s great.

@brandonj8018 3 жыл бұрын

Can you do two 35mm lenses sometime: the Tamron 35mm f/1.8 and the original canon 35L

@john_miller_ 3 жыл бұрын

I would suggest to you to upgrade to the A7r4. There are many grey dealers on ebay that ship directly from UK (or switzerland). I've seen them for around 2500€. I think the upgrade is worth the extra money considering the extra pixel, the better color rendition and the better autofocus

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

No, I love the 42mp sensor of my new a7R III because it's perfect for lens testing. 61mp is too far away from Sony's 24mp cameras to be useful to people who own those (and there are many), and 42mp is roughly in line with the 45mp cameras I use for testing Nikon and Canon equipment :-)

@EnigMagnum 3 жыл бұрын

how does this perform on crop body like a6400

@stevendeary502 10 ай бұрын

Ultimate one stop shop, travel lens

@robertmont864 3 жыл бұрын

You should test one off the camera store shelf, not one Tamron sent to you to test. If Tamron would like to have you test a lines they can reimburse you for the one you purchased off the shelf.

@nomadinneverland6832 3 жыл бұрын

Hello, I just bought the lens and it arrived today. However it is fairly stiff to zoom.. Is this because I bought a demo model that has been on display in the shop? Will it get less stiff the more I use or??

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

No idea, sorry!

@OccultDemonCassette 2 жыл бұрын

It loosens up a bit over time.

@mrbaiser4133 2 жыл бұрын

Will there be an mk2 version any time soon? The 28-75 mk2 has much better corner sharpness and autofocus than its predecessor, and if the 28-200 would get similar improvements, it would be a killer lens.

@Dave_Andre 8 ай бұрын

Right? Hopefully the g2 would have IS.

@kristinnkristinsson1369 3 жыл бұрын

Great news with the A7R III upgrade. Would you consider retesting autofocus on select lenses (especially the 24/28-70/75 f2.8 lenses)?

@TheThinFrame 3 жыл бұрын

I enjoyed for first time this weekend this lens. It is really sharp, outdoor i cant see a difference with the 28-75 tamron or sony 24-105 really sharp lenses, and in crop mode i have 28-300 reach with a sony a7riii really good

@furkan.gundogdu 2 жыл бұрын

Is this lens suitable for street photography or portrait shooting? I will use it with Sony A6000

@whitepanther785 2 жыл бұрын

Please help! Does anyone knows if the lens resolution is enough for 42 mega pixel? ( Sony A7R2 )

@Dhuoorii 2 жыл бұрын

did you find a answer ?

@whitepanther785 2 жыл бұрын

@@Dhuoorii I bought 70-200 G lens instead. Since Tammy's tends to collect dust and Sony G lens is water and dust proof.And Tammy's spiral busy bokeh is just not for me.The extra money on the Sony is worth it. I bought a used one and it wont depreciate very much.Do not buy a Tammy for a7r2.

@TheKwadwo14 Жыл бұрын

@@whitepanther785 how much was the Sony 70-200?

@whitepanther785 Жыл бұрын

@@TheKwadwo14 bought a used one for $800 usd, in perfect condition ! The G lens are so good. I'll only buy G series from now on. The motors are ridiculously fast and quiet,you can barely hear them it's sooooo crazy. Go try it at ur local Sony store. Forget about those plastic Tammys not worth it.

@Bikash_Jana 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent review.. Request to do a Nikon 24-200mm review if possible

@philindeblanc 3 жыл бұрын

You will notice a drastic improvement with the R3 vs the R2...huge difference in my experience.(in general using Canon lenses at least)

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

I've noticed only a small difference in AF speed but a bigger difference if AF 'confidence' (locking on to your subject). Also I've been surprised to see a nice little improvement in high ISO image quality (among the other improvements that camera offers)

@philindeblanc 3 жыл бұрын

@@christopherfrost On my 24-70 L v1, big difference. On my 70-200L IS v1 big difference. AF speed and actually locking on. My R2 would hunt a lot.

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

@@philindeblanc Ah, you mean when a lens is adapted

@philindeblanc 3 жыл бұрын

@@christopherfrost yes

@sussar 3 жыл бұрын

In fact the CMOS filter are getting thinner everything new generation, you'll get less deffration on R3 compare with R2 even they use the same CMOS, and the R4 got the thinnest CMOS filter which produce finest image quality, I think Christopher should really consider to upgrade your Sony camera othervise it's not fair to compare with other cameras brands you use, i.e. Canon R5, Nikon Z7 they all outperform Sony A7R2.

@tugatomskanimation6370 3 жыл бұрын

It'd be great to compare this lens with the Nikkor Z 24-200mm.

@NisalahArmstrong 3 жыл бұрын

No Test on an APS-C body? That could be an interesting range to work with on APS-C

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

Not really - 28mm isn't a wide enough angle. Much better to go with a smaller and less expensive APS-C superzoom like an 18-200mm lens

@victorbastos5859 3 жыл бұрын

I was awaiting for this review.....Chris, now please the Nikon Z 24-200!!

@k.mouanoutoua5374 3 жыл бұрын

I had this lens on my a7iii on my trip to Sedona. I can not be any happier. This the best zoom lens Tamron ever made. I had Tamron 18-400mm on my canon 90D, the sharpness of the canon system can not match this lens.