Thank you! Happy Holidays to you too. We love what we do and just want to learn so you all can spend less time guessing and more time having fun and setting records!

They’re on the docket for RIFE! Should be available quite soon

@@MotionRaceworksOfficial i figured you would be on top of it, they both seem to have the same response (like 3 seconds per degree) substantial when people have 3-5 second 8th cars.

How do I calibrate this sensor on my terminator x??

It honestly is. And if you are to trust the data to make decisions, you need correct data

4x the cost? It's not even double the price

@@Dlawler ones $20 the other is $79... that's 4 times the cost...

@@garyhowe88 is it though? One that's not just some off brand replacement on their site is $45, so $79 isn't even double that

@@Dlawler I think $20 is about right www.dedicatedmotorsports.com/product-p/gmiat.htm

@@kyleallen3857 yeah as I said for a not just some off brand one, just going of the fact it doesn't list it as an ome part, or list the actual brand of the sensor its quite likely a Chinese sensor and be even worse than the one in the video

Curious, how long did the sensor work for? Still working? Daily driver?

@@umakemerandy3669 I had one issue with the first one acting a little erratic after a couple months but they sent me a new one for free once I told them. I've been running that one for well over a year on a daily driver and it's still good to go.

@@johnvirgilsgarage alrighty, yeah they seem like a good company that would replace pretty easy. Sounds good!

The setting data is different between the two sensors. On a stock GM ECU you can adjust the calibration.

I don't think its response time they are seeing. If you notice the length of the Rife sensor is much longer so it is reading closer to the center of flow where air moves quicker and thays why he is seeing a different temp. Ideally you want you open element in the center of flow because it moves fastest in the center. Guarentee that if he had another sensor that was dead center of flow it would read even higher. Thays why in the temp sensor industry it is important to spec sensors to center of flow for most accurate measurements.

@@turbochevelle5641 the center of flow isolates the measurement from thermal mass that can affect it. It's not a temperature gradient along the radius of the tube the air flows through...it's just the heatsink that the sensor is mounted in. That affects the time constant of the system. I designed software for GM....the code is littered with first order lag filters to compensate for situations like this.

I'm not disagreeing that it wouldn't be good for the "sensor TIP to be up inside the bung" but have you done back to back testing (with data) showing the GM works "as fast as the RIFE"? Or are you _just saying_ RIFE's web site is showing incorrect/false info? ("ultra-fast response thermistors")...

All of the data is in the product listing on our website for setting up calibration data. We actually had rife separate it out and write instructions for some of the more popular efi systems

We have had them on a few of our cars this year including my Nova which has several thousand street miles and prob a hundred passes! They’ve been flawless and I really love the plumbing and wiring on them vs other remote ways of mounting sensors

@@MotionRaceworksOfficial Great news, did not know you had them in your Nova. That is what I wanted to hear. If they survived what you have put that Nova thru that is certainly enough for me. Thanks!!

No sir there is a scaling chart on our website to give you that data

@@MotionRaceworksOfficial thank you

No and get sensor is different. IAT sensors are open element type k thermocouples that are very small elements for quick response get sensors have a protective sheath to protect the element from the much higher excursion temps.

Yes you do, we actually had rife make a Holley setup document that’s in the listing of the product. Wanted to make it easy for folks to use and setup! Hope that helps!

@@MotionRaceworksOfficial cool thanks doug

Accurate readings tho.

Very important sensor if you have boost. The faster it reads and sends info to computer the longer and healthier the engine will run.

There's the first attempt at actual data-driven science I've seen on this post yet. I shared this video around with a few other ME and CS engineer friends of mine and they just kick back and laugh. Just a veiled attempt to push more products to people who don't know any better. Faster is moar better....until you're chasing low speed fueling issues forever because your IAT is dragging charge temp around to where it actually isn't. Accurate data is great if you know wtf you're actually doing.

@@anasasisxenophontis A test like this would be far easier and more accurate on the bench.

Not the way to do it. They are type k exposed element thermocouples. The way flow is properly measured is directly in the center of flow because that's where velocity is fastest and heat will be more concentrated. The gm sensor is much shorter that's why its reading is different and if they had a sensor dead center of flow it would read higher than the Rife. These guys have no idea obviously that there is no way to read real time temp and understanding excursion temps is a must along with placement of the element in the flow path. Sounds good what they are saying but they are missing the engineering principal behind why and where to take measurement for most accurate readings.

No sir, dude is day trading race sponsorships, gtr and Supra parts lol!

You just gotta put up with it if you’re gonna learn. Sorry ;)

@@MotionRaceworksOfficial I say you do a very good job.

@@BB-rn6so Correct. If you can't spend 11 minutes digesting new and important information, this may be the reason some racers are mid-pack instead of running at the top.