Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction more videos.

F-110 ??

Good video, you missed some ships. I suggest you shouldn't just go on Wikipedia to find this is information go on some other websites and war articles to fund more information. You can also see the promotion videos of the ships

Canadian surface combatant?

F-110 is not popular?

Type 26

Nope it isnt.

That and the type 26 from the UK should have been on the list. The Type 26 is as big as a destroyer fully loaded and has more VLS cells than even destroyers like China's 052. It has a goddamn purpose built hull and drive system to make it near impossible for subs to detect.

because the hunter is the t26's bigger meaner cousin with a prison record. Also they covered britains type 31 frigate.

@@dan7564 The T-31 exists because the T-26 is so big and expensive. And why would they cover a ships alternate variant? Makes no sense man.

Agree, not a minor issue.

And indian ship Is the second because this Channel Is indian 😆😆😆😆

@@quellichebenpensano1679 cause the Indian ship far more advanced lol

@@selvaranivetrivel6528 mate y got old ship old carrierz your navy is good only as torpedo target 😆😆😆

@@quellichebenpensano1679 Firstly spanish navy does not even have an aircraft carrier it decommissioned its only aircraft carrier in 2013.Secondly INS Vikramaditya is not an outdated aircraft carrier,INS Vikrant is on its second phase sea trials currently and it will be commissioned in mid 2022.Thirdly this channel is an american youtube channel.

easy targets for Rafale dont worry ;)

Δεν τη λένε Ινσταμπούλ κυρ μαλάκα. Τη λένε Κωνσταντινούπολη...

@@daniellugo4272 nope

@@daniellugo4272 why the butthurt?

@@Pzkpfw1864 really so hisar-o is a good air defence and GOKDENIZ an reliable defence

Bonjour.

this is corveta

@@Bill.D7 tf 2000 destroyer , İstanbul class frigate , milgem corvet

Uraa

@@wotistan509 aynen

las F-100 no son del futuro por eso no las incluye pero las F-110 deberia de haberla incluido porque ademas es mas potente que la mayoria de las que menciona en la funcion antisubmarina por no decir que todas pero lo mismo no la incluye por ese mismo motivo ,por ser especifica y no multiproposito como el resto o las F-100 o quizas que son racistas con todo lo de fabricacion española quien sabe jajajajaajajajajaa

El editor de este vídeo queria comisión y Navantia le dijo que nones, es por esto que la F110 no aparece, los demas le dieron para comprarse un magnum... de chocolate 🍫

Porque es un vídeo anglo-sajón.

Los videos de este editor suelen ser algo chapuceros.

Por el mismo motivo que no incluye nada Español. Cada video que me aparece de este canal le doy dislike sin verlo.

Tu lo has dicho, canal anglosajón.

Indian Channel an indian ship Is the second.....ridiculus

VIVA EL REINO DE ESPAÑA.

@UCBCu5aIo6EgGfGgtsWeRTMA Its an Indian channel with a eastern European narrator ....how is that Anglo-Saxon ???

La leyenda negra está muy extendida

The UK/Canada Type 26's didn't even get a mention.

The Australian variant, the Hunter Class is there

@@artistjoh yeah, but he putted type 31 above type 26, which simply does not make sense, as 31 is made to be a cheaper and weaker version of the 26

@@NBeaver-bx4yl Sadly, too many of this military list videos are not about any kind of objective analysis, but are purely money making clickbait.

Read the pinned comment/post by the buzz. This not ranking list, This is future frigate list..

En el mundo anglosajón España es totalmente ignorada. Hace poco ví un vídeo sobre la evolución de los tamaños de los submarinos y el Isaac Peral no fue mencionado, ¡Increíble!

Hey dude, It isn't really that good. It's good but it isn't good enough to be in top 10 sorry

@@siouneo152 The F110 will be equip with the US AN/SPY-7(V)1 and it's not good enough to be in the top 10?

@@invoicecaptive1980 at first I thought it was not good enough. I went to check the sources and it's good, Better than most :)

@@siouneo152 Like no? Just put the f111 with its stealth class, apart from the fact that the f110 has good radars that might be made in Spain, also the sensors with the UGV or the USV and the UAV. You have no idea

@@mtrd9388 yes I know that, I didn't know before but I knew about it a few days ago. Question is Kirov better than it.

Disagree there, the F-110 is based on the F-100 and is an ageing design, the Hull was actually developed from the Perry class, it is not a design that started from scratch with Stealth in mind unlike nearly all the others.

@@Harldin What are you talking about? LOL

And also the spanish F 120

Thats the Hobart Class, there is three of them and they are destroyers not Frigates. In battle they would be the lead ship.

@@ianfarr-wharton1000 no sorry. Hobart are the Spanish F100 Álvaro de Bazán class frigates modificated. The future Spanish F110 are the ones that will replace the actual F80 Santa María class (american Oliver Hazard Perry)

@@ianfarr-wharton1000 F110, not F100.

@@currololo Ignorants F 110, the Hobart Class is the spanish navantia design of F 100

Under development 😂😂

@@Thqr_Harsh all are under dvelopment

@@juliancuenca9108 I'm being sarcastic dumb

F110 frigates are very scary that's why they don't expose it

@@raulmaranon71 Thats the Hobart Class, there is three of them and they are destroyers not Frigates. In battle they would be the lead ship.

It's a destroyer, not frigate...

@@Samsun55 it’s capabilities can make it a destroyer or a frigate

@@tsarbombawithinternetconne875 the classes are determined by their weight and length.

@@tsarbombawithinternetconne875 its 7000 tons for that it counts as destroyer not frigate

@@Samsun55 but i dont under stand will it be counted as a destroyer or a frigate?

Yes, the replacement of the four F124 are 6 F127, which support full AAW. These new ships will include some MK41 strike modules for SM3 and SM6 usage against near/lower space and hypersonic threats. I found this information on ESUT: "The next generation of air defense - Preliminary views on the frigate F 127"

stfu

@@jorlm2364 wth

😂😂😂😂 a distroyer of 3000 ton😂😂😂😂so funny

@@The_ASUR_SLASHER it's 544.6 feet long and 7000+ tons according to this video

@@The_ASUR_SLASHER 0:39 7000 thousand tons of weight and 166 meters in length. Where's the 3000-ton destroyer?

@@fredscribner3688 Hes indian i doubt he has access to education

It really does not care if its a destroyer or a frigate

¿Será una muestra de la irrelevancia en la que está cayendo nuestro país?

@@currololo lamentablemente así parece ser.

No, no es así, los anglosajones siempre nos han odiado. Pérfida albión, que asco.

No es que estemos locos, es una publicación anglosajona y no quieren reconocer las bondades de los diseños españoles. Es así de simple. Los anglosajones omiten todo lo relacionado con España por cuestiones que ya todos sabemos. Incluso los derivados del Juan Carlos I y de las F-100 australianas lo presentaron en un video anglosajón como productos netamente de Australia y sin mencionar para nada a España o a Navantia.

Es qué este canal es anglosajón, y como buenos anglosajones omiten todo lo relacionado con España. Los anglosajones siguen viviendo de la muy falsa Leyenda Negra contra España incluso hoy día.

Where is india?

@@cevahirlacin9118 wow, you'd on know where is India. Go to hell

There are around 200 countries in the world .i can't know all of them ,particularly countries with little or no significance.also I am not illiterate ! I have a high school diploma .a little respect pls.

@@cevahirlacin9118 behind my house.

India is in south east asia,it is a subcontinent.seventh largest country bro.

France also has FREMM

In Spain probably...

bro its like "frigates of future"...

@@divyanshsingh2009 as i know russians ordered 2 new frigates (project 22350M)And this is most powerful frigate in the world.

Man, this is a pro-N.A.T.O channel. Russia is not a friend of these. Irony OFF. Remember that everything that appears on KZfaq is always aimed at the stars and stripes flaggers. Greetings from a pro-Russian Spaniard.

@@C_Morla We all know, that every single peace of hardware, equipment and technology made in russia is, and will always be the best in the world, made by the best engineers and overseen by the great ruler, marshall, general, führer putin. hail, putin, the greatest democrat of all time. greetings to st. petersburg. you earned your paycheck.

@@banger2998 The world biggest military budget does includes maintenance for US's large amount of military bases (not so much on other country), In fact, the same bullet that made in US probably is 4x 5x more expensive than China etc, for example when US spent 1000$ , it only barely enough to purchase a pistol for its soldier while that 1000$ in china or other country might get 20 riffles.

Absolutely! Where is it? Should be second or first.

The Hunter is a Suped up Version of the type 26. The canadians are also improving the type 26 for their fleet as well. I'm assuming they went with the hunter as they already had the type 31 for the british on the list.

The fremm ITALY? Incredibile

There's so much incorrect information in here, IDK where to begin!

@@valerianocuomo996 that's the correct version of frigate the US Navy is building as of 2020, not the Perry class shown here!

@@dan7564 the hunter is a suped up version of the type 26? haha what you been smoking? do you think the brits would sell Australia a better ship than they would build for them selves

Keep in mind these frigates are 2X current gen destroyers. Germany is building pocket cruiser again :D

@@Peizxcv yeah let's call them cruisers. That will make next gen destroyers battleships, which given there firepower (rather than size) is about right.

to be far she did have the Hunter Class Type 26.

Es superior en la cantidad de años en que comenzarán a construirse :),..también es superior en sobrecostos....:(

@@lalomillar6335 es superior en sobrecostos ? Si no se ha construido aún . Siempre habrá el típico " lisensiado" de barra de bar diciendo chorradas

@@lalomillar6335 No tienes ni pajolera idea de lo que es construir un buque de las características de la F110. Antes de ponerse a construir, tienen que pasar varios fases (todos los buques nacen así), ahora mismo, tras pasar la fase de Revisión Preliminar de Diseño, estamos en la fase de ingeniería de detalle, por lo que se están cumpliendo los plazos de la orden de ejecución. En cuanto a los sobrecostes...es de cajón que no puede hablarse de sobrecostes en esta fase, pero casi todos los proyectos de envergadura tienen sobrecostes (qué tal los de los portaaviones nuevos de EEUU, o los de proyecto F35, hay cientos de ejemplos más). Hay algo peor cerrar la boca y pasar por ignorante y es abrirla y demostrar que lo eres.

@@marctaltor1 : S-80, Pizarro,...sigo ?

@@lalomillar6335 Déficit de compresión lectora? La parte de "casi todos los grandes proyectos militares incurren en sobrecostes" quizá haya sido redactada en un lenguaje muy complicado. Intentaré hacerlo más sencillo: Construir un buque moderno dotado de características punteras y últimas tecnologías no es cómo destascar el lavabo de tu casa. No tienes idea del trabajo de investigacion y de ingeniería que supone un proyecto de esas características. Normalmente, los sobrecostes van asociados a factores como los retrasos (muchas veces por motivos políticos), las crisis económicas, la inflación, subida de las materias primas...el caso que citas del Pizarro se debió sobretodo al retraso sufrido por una crisis y porque al acumularse ese tiempo, el diseño quedó algo desfasado y el ET introdujo nuevas especificaciones. El caso de los S80 es un caso diferente, acumuló sobrecostes sobre todo porque hubo un retraso (aparte de las crisis) basado en problemas de ingeniería... construir un submarino desde cero no es cómo hacerte la cama, precisamente...es uno de los proyectos de ingeniería más complicados que hay, y desde luego el más complicado de la ingeniería naval. España fabrica excelentes buques, como muestra la exportación de las clases Juan Carlos I o Álvaro de Bazán, buques de aprovisionamiento, lanchas de desembarco, etc. Los ingleses tuvieron sobrecostes en sus portaaviones, llevan años diseñando un tanque; los estadounidenses con proyectos como la clase Zumwalt (un fracaso de proporciones bíblicas), o el F35; los italianos, los chinos...Todos han tenido sobrecostes en sus proyectos principales.

Is the most class fremm ITALY

German government does not want to have official destroyers. Mich other german frigates are destroyers too. But this does not really care at all

@@kwtr1609 I believe it was The Buzz mistake in falling into the trap. Very soon you will see your enemy sending a fleet of 10,000T Corvette to your shoreline saying we are only corvette, nothing to be afraid of, we come in peace. In fact, I believe the terminology should have been scrapped, simply call them N-000 Ton war ships.

@@cyrilchui2811 Yes that was why the german navy does not call it destroyer. Because destroyer sounds worse than corvette.

@al rode Yes. The own thing i miss at german ships is that there are vers less VLS. It would be possible to do VLS on every ship, but that does just not happen

It's already done chek the channel for the video

@@arunjith9397 ya sure brother I had watched that video . Its really superb. But after the ban of some exporting items india is planning to develop some more weapons indigenously so iam requesting for a new update version . As this all had done in recent months.

no es una corbeta ,es una fragata especializada en lucha antisubmarina listo

@@isaacrodriguezjimenez7424 algunas de las que estan podrian ser clasificadas como corvetas por tamaño/armamento

нет США только РОССИЯ и Индия не вместе, но и в одиночку, их вещи надежны и лучше всего США - это ребенок перед ними обоими.

good ship for its size. but no match for large Frigates of 6000 tons or more.

I think the HELLENIC navy ordered 3 +1

@@rohitb5834 match what ? Best radar, best missiles, smallest signature.

@@transalp1853 best radar? Radar has a range of 300 kms which is average. Best missiles? Its equipped with 1970s Exocet missile which is poor. Signature i agree with you.

@@rohitb5834 The Thales Seafire is unmatched. Exocet is an early 70'ies device but the last Block3c version is used.

actually no ... just the video got some facts wrong. The Hunter Class or Type 26 not as good as the Type 31 Arrowhead... are you kidding me...

@@NighthawkNZ no😒