there are none...for last 5 years.... My BRZ also had some noise that i still can not find where it come form.

All the cars that are not on this list

Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Acura, Lexus

1999 Nissan micra

@@farhanrahim2770 mazda seems to be doing OK for the newer models

Me too! ;)

@Wuanslm rev up your engines!

I don’t think you would think about buying a bentley and end up buying a toyota 😑😐

@Wuanslm I see the petty Scotty has gotten to you too😂

Yeah

Mine is out every day and working fine. It is serviced only by an authorized dealership

It was not made for you if you keep having comments like this

That was genuinely funny lol.

Carversal Pro🧡 your sentence gave me a stroke

@Carversal Pro🧡 oooh ....so sad you had to like your own comment

And all of the driving excitement and Prestige involved in driving that Toyota and no extra charge. Haha

Don’t buy cars you can’t afford to upkeep. It’s pretty simple really.

You mean Range Rover, Porsche and BMW's nervous sweating? X6 and Cayenne both fell worse than the Range Rover. Also, BMW came last in both the 2018 and 2019 dependability studies. This info from Warrantywise just adds some substance to those results.

@@Clavinovaman It was just a joke but thanks for the info 😊🙃

German cars ain't reliable in a nowadays .... the sad story....

@@Clavinovaman Talking with a friend one day about mental stress. He was manager of a Range Rover dealership here in Queensland. "You don't know what stress is said he, until you see a $140,000 Range rover coming in on the back of a truck with the new owner sitting in the front with his arms folded.

@@jannandjohn Oh I am not suggesting Range Rover's are 100% reliable. Not even close. But, as you can see from this 'least reliable cars' video, it wasn't a Range Rover that was the worst 4x4, with no Discovery branded cars showing at all. The most unreliable 4x4s were the Porsche Cayenne and X6. Porsche, as a brand, is largely omitted from reliability stats due it not selling in sufficient numbers, with the MOST unreliable car being a Bentley. The more software you have installed in your car - the more trouble you are going to get. It really isn't a difficult concept to grasp and it amazes me how people seem to think this is particular, or unique, to one company. How often do you get updates for your Apps with the update info showing 'Various Bug fixes'? Software installed with cars is no different Jan and John - the severity of bugs and instability being directly proportionate with its complexity. Whether that be Porsche, Bentley or Range Rover.

True!

I didn't know Honda was an Australian 😁

Surprisingly my mum's Honda civic was not reliable. It had a faulty gearbox at just 80k and now the car is distant to scrap

Hmm, the American's Honda Odyssey is unreliable tho

Amwaj Ameen you are right , i have an e53 x5 d sport uk 🇬🇧 spec in le mans edition its been reliable but i fix many issues myself , and i have a 2014 prius no problem at all whats so ever.

Exactly! Feel that German engineering... it makes me so mad.

THe german get worse don't mean other europen brna d got better..

I guess Alfa don't have enough sales to make the list.

Guys, it is one specific companie’s stats. I am pretty interested in their target group since all the cars on the list are very high and and don’t tell me that a Bentley is less reliable than a suzuki swift. It is probably a very specific client group that they have. Also, it isn’t just about the number of issues, but also their costs. It can happen that Italian and French cars has many more issues, they are just cheapernto fix. Remember, there are no Vlokswagens or Skodas or Opelsbon thisnlist either...

well its actually less than 50% on this list but ok

nounou kasber McLaren only makes supercars! And no Supercar is reliable.Lamborghini and Porsche are probably the inly reliable supercar brand(after vw took over)

people dont make repair claims on mclarens, they just burn down

McLaren warranty is provided by a provider called Car Care Plan, Warrantywise probably don't cover any McLarens.

They recalled their cars

The Murci dude

aahh,,,, mclaren, if your pop in to gear was not so violent and your paint was not coming of after the first car wash, you be perfect.

Germany is literally all over this list. Now, if only Japanese makes had bought out our low volume luxury cars - could have been as reliable as a Lexus. Lotus had the right idea of fitting a Toyota engine.

Well, there is no reliability warrant to claim if the entire car is turned to ashe. Can't fix what isn't there :D

@I Damn you seem salty over not being able to afford a "McLoser", and if you did some research you'd be surprised that outside of KZfaqrs their cars (prior to the 720S and Senna) are surprisingly reliable, in fact, more so then Ferraris. Also, Nissan makes their own engines, McLaren outsource to an engineering firm that has nothing to do with them and it's not a Nissan engine (and yes I'm aware that an engineer in that firm worked on some '90s Nissan Le Mans engines, something I doubt you know but rather saw someone comment something similar).

@@andrewnorris5415 That Rover situation was a mess, wasn't it? Honda could have bought Rover, but it went to BMW and now it is with SAIC.

thanks, and while the german cars are the more expensive, higher performance ones... Ford managed with Ford Galaxy (vs VAG's Sharan/Alhambra) Mazda managed to be in the list with CX-5 (vs Tiguan/Kodiaq) Chevrolet managed to charge half of a Captiva!

Aye no FCA on the list 🤓

Thenx man..you the hero

Ford is the BEST!!

Im happy that X4 is not here. X4 is X6, but smaller.

So if you pay 5x the price of a cheaper car from USA, Japan or Korea you don't even expect the same reliability? Ill drive my Lexus to 300k miles thank you very much.

@@andrewj4426 what? I’m not even sure you understand what Dirk is suggesting..

@@displayname2149 He understood but made a solid counter argument. If you pay so much for a car the probability of failure should decrease enough so that times the cost of repair would not increase the unreliability score.

@@displayname2149 I'm not even sure you understand what he's suggesting 😅

Makes you wonder if they make these expensive cars purposefully crap so that they can milk the suckers that buy them with repairs.

I have owned several, and they're junk. The Infiniti FX 35 is my daily driver now, and much faster then any BMW I've ever driven.

Why u gotta spoil it

@@LifeofJD saves time

Begging for likes I see

Hero

Notice the distinct lack of Japanese cars on this list! Well done Honda and Toyota! 👏👏👏

Scotty

johnson mm Nice! I’m in a 95 Hyundai Elantra.

The most reliable car according to Scotty Kilmer

05 Celica. Serviced every year, mild tune, Blitz intake, Japspeed system (silenced), daily driver. Never misses a beat.

You're kidding right? the 1994 Gen 6 is one of the MOST reliable cars out there. Unless you had a ragged example. Proof: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h5N9Y7BnntKtdo0.html

Peugeot is good

the Allies & the Axis...together😅

Clarkson said the same with French and Italian. No. He said: "run for your life".

The unreliable of british engineering and complex design parts of germans

Tea and sausages intensify.

@@trianggaindralukmana2184 I mean...german cars aren't reliable. European cars are just pieces of shit.

@@DanielTaneski wishing you the best of luck with that. If it’s anything like sports cars your can’t and shouldn’t try to do that

Actually a good plan. Toyota and Honda make good reliable vehicles. They also stand behind those vehicles. Toyota recalls for everything, unlike many other manufacturers that have an attitude of you bought it your problem. Being a DIY guy I find Toyota vehicles are well designed, good quality hardware/parts used when made. Working on a Toyota is fairly easy. Their vehicles are well designed by engineers. No problem getting parts as there is a huge aftermarket parts source availability. Just look at the vehicles in a parking lot. How many domestic vehicles that are fairly new do you see with paint/rust issues? What I notice is you still see a lot of older Toyota's, Honda's and some Subaru's on the road.

Lol. Toyotas and hondas have their issues too.

@@conradsealy9603 like

@@conradsealy9603 I understand cars like Chrysler and the Bentley continental look good but they aren’t reliable. I personally don’t wanna take care of my car and pay a leg to repair and maintain. So yes all vehicles are prone to issues but some are just plain bad unless you willing or can pay the price

Well the only German cars on this list are high-end ones. Up to the A4/C-Class/3-Series they're actually pretty reliable.

Engineering and reliability are quite independent traits. The cars are actually engineered very well, but since they come from the part of the world with different consumer behaviours, there is not enough emphasis on longevity of the product. The average age of a car in Germany is about 9 years. Almost every car will make it that far. What happens then is not that big of a concern for them.

@@dominiksuk7261 There are no truly bad cars these days and most, if maintained correctly, should give very little trouble for the first 5 years. Then it's a case of avoiding cars with complex electronics and ones where the owner has skimped on servicing,. which is the kiss of death for cars like BMW, which require meticulous servicing with genuine parts for a long life.

@@tarkanbashllari1627 - 'Pretty reliable' isn't exactly what fans of German Engineering think they're getting. The reality is that Japanese and South Korean Engineering is head and shoulders above that. Look back at JD Power surveys over the years, and you'll see exactly what the truth is.

@@dominiksuk7261 - What utter nonsense. Engineering is about the whole design and production process. The Germans simply aren't any better than anyone else at this when it comes to cars. It's just a myth perpetrated by fanboys.

Nikhil Naidoo Don’t buy a car with an engine**

Felix Samuelsson don’t buy a car with brakes

@@lukeman2751 hol up!

That’s it, I’m buying a donkey.

Solution: buy a tank

Yep. This has been true for a good while now. Just needs to be more widely accepted ;).

The thing with this list is that all the cars have expensive repair cost by them self. You won't see a seat with that kinda of costs, but it can have more problems that amount to the same amount of costs of those cars. Meaning that it is less reliable. Plus it also has to do with people that repaired there cars. You won't spend 5000 pounds on a seat ibiza, but you would on a porsche cayenne.

Samuel Roque yes exactly- 1 repair on a £80k bmw will cost more than 20 repairs on a piece of shit Fiat. They may not even be reported because the owner has traded it on for something new

Yes, like Samuel says below, the study is flawed. The cost of repairs is directly proportional to the price of the car, that’s why you find a Bentley at the top. Also, let’s be real, an individual wouldn’t run an engine repair bill of over 10k - they’d swap out an entire reconditioned engine for less than half that. Unless there’s some sort of insurance paying the bill.

Couldn't agree more. I've worked with cars for over a decade and Citroen/Peugeot and Renault are far more reliable than BMW/Audi/Rangerover nowadays. Well done France!

They’d probably build a Sushi holder on the dash, so you don’t have to hold it.

@@AftabulousAF Good one LOL!!!

Correction: Hord my sushi

Sake, not sushi.

uh idk if this is offensive

Yup it's actually on there twice

But not doing too bad

@@derlangsame4471 Yes BMW is even less reliable

@@wince_moeron twice doesn't count range Rover and range Rover sport is technically the same car with different powertrains

Well , at least JLR are doing better than the Germans , which is half of this list !.

HEY ! is reliable, if you check your engine oil 2 a week, have less then 350hp, and change the apex seals twice a year, that can cost a pretty penny... who every says Apex seals are cheap, i'm moving to your country, ( cheapest i ever found was edgar with Mazda pros in SOflo, for 2900usd, cash straight and lasted me for a long time)

See any old Mazdas on the roads? I don’t. That says it all.

Makoto Shimabukuro but having a rx7 without more than 350 hp isn’t fun

@@josephj6521 There's like a million Mazda MX-5s and other models. Mine had 400k miles before I got bored of it and sold it.

@@wind016 Exactly. I heard a saying, you see one bad review about the car, there are another 200 people having no problems and not sharing it. Some guys break down before 200k, some drive flawlessly even after 400k.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Legend

Mitsubishi

haha those are reliable its just a myth

My Alfa Stelvio has almost 70k miles at this point and I have had zero issues. I love it

@@davis6123 thats a rare case lol....at 100k, expensive problems will come

Fast honda cars? Which fast and furious episode is that?

makes a lot of sense because they are more expensive to repair

Because they overcomplicated everything

@Shogun Gaming Force lol wait... mitsubishi?

@Shogun Gaming Force Our family friend had mk3 Pajero too and it had ton of problems, he had to spend like 3-6k€ overall within 2-3 years and then he decided to get rid of it. Also I think Volvo would be pretty expensive on that list you suggested too. Me, my sister and my mother all drive a Volvo and on top of that I got 3 friends and few other close relatives that owns a Volvo and nobody has had pretty much any issues. Also the spare parts for Volvos are super cheap and at least here overall they have the highest mileage too because they just last forever.

BMW and Audi are very unreliable cars.

iDrive is the best...but it cost lots to fix, ok so Mercedes is even better! Next car...most expensive claim is their system breaking.

It’s factual

i drive system “I AM THE SENATE”

Audi MMI system: Am I a joke to you? Everyone else: YES.

The new iDrive is better and updated

LMFAO

Mazda is an Alpha, Chevrolet is an Alpha.

Who would be daft enough to buy one of those.

See my comment above.. I'd rather stick with my Alfa 145. Very reliable.

@@hachanabe.... Mazda is not an Alfa...... Only the under body and skeleton is made jointly to save costs. The electrics, bodywork and suspension, engine and gearbox is made by the manufacturer that had the badge on it, Check it out, Yes, decades ago Mazda and Ford did what you are saying, it is called BADGE ENGINEERING.. all badges including the one on the steering just show the name of cat but the exact car is, identical to the other... Including all engine parts.

MH0709 my old cayenne turbo has 350 000 km on it and still runs pefectly fine🤷

@@krabbe969 well how old is it?

i always say "just get a wagon"

MH0709 my landcruiser got 435000 and counting

@@krabbe969 might be the only one

Exactly, otherwise Peugeot, Fiat and Vauxhall and the others would have been up there.

And a higher cost per claim due to part and labour costs not the issue itself

It's biased in any way possible. This video is 100% entertainment and will hardly help anybody. It overrepresents expensive cars with the most expensive parts and very picky owners or sporty cars that will get a lot of abuse. The brakes of a heavy M car need expensive repairs...oh, really?

Very true. The data is missing the non-warrantywise issues.

@@Anonymous-gt3zg Though by this calculation of probability x cost, Peugeot Fiat and Vauxhall will probably be near the bottom because the cost to repair is cheap and probability isn't much higher than any other manufacturer (as in, not enough to offset the cost difference). Bentley probably have massive labour costs, same as BMW, Audi etc.

@G A kzfaq.info/get/bejne/napzedZmppepYXU.html

It will be all the Japanese brands (bar Nissan). The masters of real mechanical quality as opposed to perceptive quality *cough*VAGgroup*cough

Tony Behl Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,Toyota, Lexus,

@G A not all Toyota is reliable

@@Xyb3rTeCh Nobody said all Toyota are reliable. But the most reliable cars are Toyota. Even if we include those very few unreliable Toyotas, The would still be on par (If not more) with average German/Italian cars in terms of reliability.

Japanese, NOT JDM

@@R4M_Tommy bruh, jdm means japanese domestick market, a car doesnt need to be a supra to be jdm

A JDM car is the one which complies with the Japanese regulation standards which includes right hand drive and other regulations which are solely ment for the Japanese domestic market.

@Explo1t you mean 1000, not 10000

Roy_ 2222 bruh, jdm cars are only sold in japan.

Yeah, he's a cool guy. Cool mum too.

Carwow is quality entertainment!!

When covid-19 outbreak started i become petrolhead because i have plenty time to learn driving car so i watch youtube video about how to drive a car and now ended up here

Most underrated comment

2 of your vehicles are reliable Lexus. lol

@Sendit Sunday wuuuuuuuuuut use ur fkn brain >> japanese make the most fun reliable affordable cars ever ( mr2 , s2000 , rx8/7 , wrx , rsx , nissan z....etc )

@Sendit Sunday ok im done hahahahaha cya bro pahaaha

@@joundi007 rx8, rx7 and wrx aren't reliable at all lol. Also from when is rotary reliable

Kia (and hyundai for that matter) have improved MASSIVELY in the past few years, in both trying to improve reliability and styling. They’re definitely no longer the joke of the car industry like they were especially in the early/mid 2000s.

Mercedes is doing good here

If it's brand new you might be ok, Mercs have been steadily improving their reliability since the early 00s when they were on par with a crashed Alfa. Still, German cars are good for many things but reliability is definitely not one of them.

E class working just fine here

@@ApothecaryTerry The old '80s diesel Mercs were very reliable; when I lived in Germany there was a lady who drove her 240D on a daily basis.

I once owned a W203. I get PTSD just thinking of it.

iSN1P 12 laughs in bore off

iSN1P 12 Toyota is crap though

The biggest problem with owning a Toyota is begging it to break down cause you want to have an excuse to buy a "better" car, but it never does!

Still running my 2006 Corolla 1.6. No issues at all. Lovely car.

Toyota reliability is atrocious taking into account they have no actual technology. 😂 Here's the proof. europe.jdpower.com/press-releases/2019-uk-vehicle-dependability-study

was expecting a few renaults and peugeots/citroens

@@shaysimms8862 Me too. But I'm happy, as I own a Peugeot (after three other Peugeots).

You have too little likes for this gem💀🤣😂

I was hoping you’d say they only “break up”.

More like Lexus

Well played 😏

@@dav1dd552 Absolutely not will never be as reliable Lexus. Listen if you're wealthy enough to go and buy a brand new Rolls-Royce or Bentley. You just go buy another one and trade it in.

If one broke down the owner probably just buys a new one! 😂

the list on cover what know to pubilc...

@@carwow see, if you are rich enough, there is no such thing as "repairs" you buy a new car just the way you buy a new phone each 2-4 years

@@carwow Same reasons for the Italian and French ones, different reason though. None of them are worth 1200 bucks after 10 years.

What's more surprising is there's no McLaren either.

Same...ill get the hang of it eventually xD

Why has it changed to this

That's what friend of mine said of the old ones. I have '16 Passat and not even 1 issue yet. Let's see~

99% of Vw cars after the 1.9TDI =garbage

German pumpe duse diesels in those were really bad.

I've heard the passat was the least reliable Volkswagen

Buy a Mazda 6

Value for money, uber luxury & can take to a dinner party or off roading with a trailer. The Swiss army knife in any situation... Toyota Land Cruiser 4.2 td. 1998. Compare to my 2010 Bentley flying shi... Which needs the workshop like every 6 months. The King Cruiser will only needs parts like wear & tear only. BFGoodyear after 50k. 25mpg up or down, against the wind, 3 ton trailer or not. The German failed to produce a better engine & yes I've had the crap v10 toureg, 4.2td in A8 & the v6 in the phaeton which is passable. Bomb proof & that's why 25 year old Land Cruisers are still selling for £10k. Japs don't do headaches....

111mmgg The old natural aspirated diesels. Non of them stopped before a Million kms

Yup so true pretty much what mats saying is Mercedes is the most reliable German car 🤟🤟👌👌👌🤣🤣

Yeah, just about every old diesel Benz I’ve seen has had at least 300k to over a million miles on them and still run just fine. Old Volvo’s are also pretty bulletproof. The only enemy of those cars are lack of maintenance and rust. Gotta love older cars that were easily repairable and engineered to last.

Still driving a 190E with 677,000 miles

you will still find these traversing the expanses of africa right now, after going several times around the clock, treated like an off road 4x4, still faithfully doing their duty. the w116 and w126's are bomb proof.

Ah, the selespeed.........better with a manual. Had a 156 and a 159. Better looking than the German equivalents, cheaper to service and only one problem. The timing belt on the 156 went earlier even than the downwards revised recommended replacement time. Alfa fixed it, no charge, no quibbles.

SUV and electronics.. Hmm, amazing. No one would have thought

Mostly German you forgot to mention.

Thomas Wilkinson I wonder if SUV actually stands for Surprisingly Unreliable Vehicle? 😀

Extra weight wears out suspensions faster. Especially when the weight is higher up, leading to more body roll.

They're not Japanese

I thought my Panda would be on the chopping block for sure

There might not be lot's of Stelvios and Giulias older than 3 years around in the uk. And they state that they only include vehicles which they provide an extended warranty for, and if there are more than 100 vehicles of the certain type. So maybe only 1 type of Alfa -> the Giulietta, and still then, they have to provide an extended warranty for it to be counted.

Not Alfa All the SUVs took up most of that space

@@nirfz well that is exactly what it is,no other way

*laughing my ass off* in rx8

Laughing in Mazda 6...well it actually didn't give issues,it was just cheaply built😂

@@RXYannick I bought an RX8 in Florida and we TWO replacement Engines, within the 5 year Warranty period. We part exchange the car when the warranty ran out. Saying all that a brilliant Fun car to drive, always put a smile on my face as the engine revs up . In fact we had no servicing costs at All! It was also flatbed to the Dealer many times as it Flooded if you stopped the engine within a few minutes of a cold start. Again this FAult was covered at in the U.S. the car was not considered to be of merchantable Quality under their Lemon laws. in fact MAZDA set-up an engine repair factory their, for all the dealers to send the engines for repair. The CAR had no other faults in the 5 Years.

If it's really reliable most of the time it isn't "really reliable."

*Cries in dorito*

Uh lexus has reliable air suspension and wont cost an arm and a leg to repair.

Seem to be many engine issues, too--highly ironic for products whose primary feature is to have an engine... ^^

nothing wrong with air suspension if u take care of it

@@ruslanbin5266: Like many other things, really... :)

Until u get TOYOTA/LEXUS brands air suspension, u can buy with closed eyes. reliable like a mother to a baby!

Kia

Toyota and Lexus

Those are actually really boring cars. Mostly really small cars like the honda jazz with little to no high tech and durable but no pleasant to touch materials.

Kia and Volvo are not that reliable 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 Toyota Lexus Hyundai (don't laugh) and MAYBE Mazda (with exceptions)

@@dennisnguyen978 Not all of them- even the top end Lexus models are ridiculously reliable like the F models, LC500 (and 500h) and GS450h. None of those are boring, even the hybrids in that list will rip out your spleen at full throttle.

Toyota. Or if you want something that isnt lame & you like driving: a C5, C6, or non turbo E82. (reliable, N/A, manual, no infotainment crap in some, RWD, no DPF, normal suspension etc.)

Lexus/toyota/honda

1. Daihatsu 2. Honda 3. Mazda 4. Toyota taken from official reliability index

Toyota x15 Simple

@@EngiNetion I would say models matter too, as you see the Mazda on this "worst" list as well :)

*F L E X*

Which one was ugly, ok the X6, but the rest, no.

@@Jabber-ig3iw SUV's are ugly bro. For the same price as an X6, you can get something way better from a sedan. I really don't understand the reasoning of SUV buyers.

@@Jabber-ig3iw *the sQ7 looks amazing too!!*

@@angrysocialjusticewarrior X6 is very ugly. But not every SUV is ugly and expensive. Look at Peugeot 3008 or DS7 Crossback. Also you guys forget why SUVs got so popular. It's not because of off-road. People just want tall cars, because in tall car you can sit very comfortable (by comfortable I mean tall seating position, in wagons you have awkward and uncomfortable low siting position, especially in second row - your kness are almost on the level of your head ). So people want tall cars. However tall cars usually are not attractive (most minivans). To make tall cars less 'square', you need large ground clearance. Not for off-road. For LOOKS. Compare tall but low car (minivan) with something like Peugeot 5008. It has a tall body, but because of large ground clearance proportions are better than in case of minivan. So, crossovers and SUVs are good way to make tall car, but more attractive than minivan. Maybe wagons have better aerodynamics, but they aren't that much better looking than SUVs (most German wagons look like a sedan with glued bigger trunk in the rear). My biggest problem with the large European sedans/wagons is that they are a waste of space. Yes, waste. Despite common belief, wagons are not 'more practical' than SUVs. Larger European wagon has the same length as large SUV (around 5 meters) and similar width. So it's not easier to park wagon. Audi A6 avant is as hard to park as grand Jeep Grand Cherokee, but it's lower, so it has worse comfort. Jeep is big but it's not ugly as minivan, because large ground clearance at the bottom introduces some 'air' to sides. So SUVs are not stupid. Wagon is better only if you live in Germany and drive 250 km/h on autobahn. Most SUVs are silent and can drive well up to 200 km/h. In my opinion the best kind of car is sedan (because it looks really good), but it has to be very, very long to be comfortable (because of sloping roofline). That's not practical. Then next best car is a hatchback, because of good space/length/aerodynamics balance. Then there is an SUV, with almost minivan space but with better looks. Minivan itself is also acceptable if you care only about functionality. Despite what you day, the dumbest cars are not SUVs. Small/midsize sedans or wagons (especially long wagons) are most stupid in my opinion. Because space/length balance is really bad for sedans, therefore in small and midsized sedans you don't feel comfortable. In wagons there is more space, but wagons are on the other hand uglier than sedans. Aerodynamics is the only gain compared to SUVs. Some people say wagons are more fun to drive, but it's no longer true. The difference in handling between good SUV and wagon is small, as wagon is not a true sporty car anyway (long wheelbase - not so much fun in the corners). Wagons are for people who think they can have everything at once - low, attractive sports car and comfortable car. But wagons are not truly sporty (long wheelbase), nor truly attractive (rear end), nor truly comfortable (low). Meant to do everything and good at nothing.

either both brand had issue. hence why i don't buy new car for few year now... just dealing iwth a plastic gas pump....

Toyota is da best 😍😁😘👌

No it's not

@@farhanrahim2770 Toyota sucks

@@supundissanayake4311 let me guess, you're a brand snob

Some of them actually are. They are designed for customers who switch to newer models quickly and don't keep the same car for a long time

Mazda diesel engines are notoriously problematic, and I guess the UK market mainly buys the diesels. :)

@@TassieLorenzo yes I heard about Mazda diesels being quite troublesome. Apparently a common issue on their diesels is the oil pick up pipe which stops oil going into the engine, ending in total engine failure😬

Haha

😂😂😂

And if your 1999 Nissan Micra breaks you aren't gunna bother calling your insurance up

Isn't reliability a prime concern when you lay down that kind of dough?

@@allanjoles3432 No.

@@allanjoles3432 The kind of people who pay new car prices for things like Bentleys are the kind of people who will sell that same car in less than three years with less than 30k on the clock and replace it with something slightly more expensive. Most first owners of Bentleys won't ever see a 100k service, so will never need to worry whether the rest of the car will last as long as the engine will.

@@allanjoles3432 Exactly! If I'm dishing out $400,000 on a car, than that car had BETTER give me at LEAST 350,000 TROUBLE-FREE km's!! I am NOT expecting premature engine and electrical issues on a vehicle that cost more than my friggin' house! And if the vehicle manufacturer doesn't agree to cover the repair costs in their ENTIRETY, I will have their asses in court so fuckin' fast, they won't know what hit them!!

Half the problem for American cars is that everything on them is practically made in China or Mexico -_-.

What's equally apparent is that nothing that Tata has done to fix Jaguar, Land Rover, or Range Rover in the last ten years has worked. Actual Tatas are more reliable than these things.

@@DAN007thefoxx1 To be honest, it's usually the other half that fails...

@@DAN007thefoxx1 I saw something a few years ago that showed an american car was over 90% foreign parts and built in mexico, and a japanese car was majority american parts and built in like Tennessee

@@storms13 The modern NSX is designed and made in Ohio. And I have yet to hear of any major recalls for it. But Im not sure I would trust a "brake by wire" system. Especially on something capable of nigh 200 mph. But compare that to GM and the Cobalt having tons of recalls, one of which almost killed a buddy when he hit someone head on at 45 mph and the airbag didn't even go off. And now GM simps to China.

You, your father, grandfather.. laughed pretty much in the same land cruiser as the technology and design have not changed in the 30 years

@@mihai08 It is probably the same car and has done 3 x to the moon and back with no issues...

@@zakelwe no disputing that if I am faced with the task of taking an SUV for an epic Adventure I will go for the LC200 V8 Bi-turbo Diesel with GXR or VXR trim or A Nissan Patrol Safari or even a Toyota Hilux :)... but (big but) if I only go on occasion off roading and I have the car under warranty Land Rover Discovery LR4 or the new Range Rover Sport... and if I want the best of both worlds (which I can't afford) A G class 350 Diesel BTW in Dubai or any of the Emirates, Toyota Camrys drive to the moon and back every 2 years as taxis l, they only switch off the engine when they change oil

@@mihai08 🤣🤣

Hahah

REALLY.? I find that hard to believe. Most electric cars have a cut off switch or similar. I think the emergency services need to learn where these are, and how to operate them...

@@VFRrider none of that work when the battery module is damaged

so much for miljövänligt when its trying to kill you

some Lexus are luxury cars

@@uc5815 most of them. it's the point of a lexus. Luxury, reliability without being too much visible in public

@@blitzwing1 it's all perceived luxury, people are sold on "high residual" "snazzy led lights" "solid build" but what lurks beneath are some of the worst design, cheapest parts and as for depreciation, if they think 50% of 30k is less than 60% of 20k then they obviously can't do math either

@@uc5815 lexus tries to do luxury cars but they fail miserably. No foreign brand can match the elegance of high european brands.

@@leonardom9190 are you high?

The hipsters and fools that buy them lol

The thing is the German car manufacturers don’t care about that unreliability, they earn their money with it. They design parts to brake so they can earn money with repair parts

Worst is Alfa Romeo

@@grzegorzbrzeczyszczykiewic3671 alfa romeo cars is very reliable ...

Brian Rocks 9 out of 10 times it is usually the battery that needs to be replaced but all dealerships will make you pay them to go thru and replace every electrical component relevant to the fault before either forcing you to get a new car or telling you it’s the battery after the billed you $1000 to $2000 for unnecessary stuff. Sad thing is on BMWs when the battery is failing the amber/red check battery lamp is not used to tell you that . Instead the battery failure sets off check lamps and fault codes for any random electrical thing whether it be transmission, navigation, central locking, radio, wiper blades, abs, dsc, etc... I’ve had several BMWs going back from my first a 1995 318i to my father in law’s 2018 750i (which surprisingly already had a dead battery) and they all do the same thing when the battery is dead or dying. Not a lot of folks know this. Always do your KZfaq homework before buying a BMW.