The 4 Cylinder Future | Chevy Colorado ZR2

  Рет қаралды 221,867

savagegeese

savagegeese

Күн бұрын

We discuss the future of General Motors 2.7L 4 cylinder, the future engine for the brand. With help from the assistant chief engineer, we showcase the technology, engineering, and fixes. We take the Chevy Colorado for a drive and tie it all together. Other brands competing in this space are the Ford Ranger, Toyota Tacoma, Nissan Frontier, Honda Ridgeline.
#cars #technology #engineering
00:00 Intro and Interview
1:32 2.7L Block, Cylinders, and Goals
3:53 Differences in Worktruck vs HO
7:30 Durability, DI and AFM
8:08 Dual PCV
9:29 Fixing AFM, Hydro vs. Solenoid
12:12 A Better Turbo
15:06 A Honest Discussion About Reliability
18:21 Driving Impressions
25:54 Final Thoughts

Пікірлер: 1 600
@Crisheight
@Crisheight 10 ай бұрын
It says a lot that you guys consistently sit down and have these conversations, and the guests are consistently like "...yep." (your research is solid). No one does this kind of content, love this channel. I think the guests gain an appreciation too (respect of craft).
@austinfrazier7325
@austinfrazier7325 10 ай бұрын
Completely disagree. In a vacuum, yes the engineer segments are fine although I never found them that great to begin with. They are just gonna toe the company line maybe with some good nuggets here and there. Jack can cover most of it. If you watched the last livestream, the future of this channel seemed in serious jeopardy due to burnout. Reduce effort and cut these out. Would you rather have engineer segments or no more SG?
@toddlehman1
@toddlehman1 10 ай бұрын
@@austinfrazier7325Man, are you with Deloitte or something?
@austinfrazier7325
@austinfrazier7325 10 ай бұрын
@@toddlehman1 don’t even know what that means 😂
@Crisheight
@Crisheight 10 ай бұрын
​@@austinfrazier7325 Whatever they decide to do with this channel, I will stick around for it to try. The decision you pose is not my responsibility, but theirs. Like many KZfaqrs, they will have to weigh the tough choice of time/effort vs retention, and I won't fault them for changing directions. edit: Because you could very well be completely correct
@joseeduardo4327
@joseeduardo4327 10 ай бұрын
They are what they are because of in depth stuff like this. If we wanted the same old reviews, I’d check out the other 12,000 car review channels. Keep it up SG
@PookDaWook
@PookDaWook 10 ай бұрын
Props to GM for consistently supporting SG in these kinds of videos. Well done to Jack too with the interview portion. He structured the interview really well and asked all the right questions. Maybe in the future we could get full interviews on a Patreon?
@savagegeese
@savagegeese 10 ай бұрын
Yes for sure. Its planned for CX90 and Lucid
@PookDaWook
@PookDaWook 10 ай бұрын
@@savagegeese Thanks for taking the time. I'll be there
@halleffect1
@halleffect1 10 ай бұрын
I'd rather have a strait 6, but they don't work with modern truck short hood design.
@terrencejones9817
@terrencejones9817 10 ай бұрын
Full disclosure. In my 23 years working in the Auto Industry. 11 of them have been with GM. I started in 1999 took a long break and back since 2014. Ive seen the worst and best of GM. This engine seems to be well built. Ive driven many since they came out in 2019. Including a loaner for a week while my Silverado Trailboss was down with a transmission issue ( 8 speed, internal temp sensor failure). They drive well, they build boost fast. However, i vert much disagree about then sound, these sound awful! Im general i enjoy the sound of a properly boosted 4 cylinder, I grew up modding DSMs. But the 2.7 sounds like it hates to rev. Fuel economy. My 5.3L Trailboss get better highway fuel economy than a 2.7L without the Trailboss lift and highway tires. The 2.7L is better in the city for sure. Overall the 2.7L is a fine choice. But it's not better than the 5.3L
@ayushmalpeddi2793
@ayushmalpeddi2793 10 ай бұрын
Yeah they are approximately equal depending on your needs. It would be awesome if they made a turbo V6 mild or full hybrid (not plug in) to give 20mpg+ in the city
@thatoneotherotherguy
@thatoneotherotherguy 10 ай бұрын
It seems like the primary goal of this engine was not to be "better than the old 5.3L V8". Seems like it was mainly to develop such a modular engine that they can use it in a bunch of different applications and vehicles. Being sort of "equal to the old 5.3L V8", better than the tragic 3.6L V6, better than the 2.5L 4cyl, and being able to scale much more production of just one engine seems like a win for the brand overall, as long as they prove reliable. I don't know if I'd particularly want this over a 5.3L, but I'd definitely want it over any of the prior 3 Colorado engines.
@Logjammer69
@Logjammer69 10 ай бұрын
Lmfao whatever man
@cormaro13
@cormaro13 10 ай бұрын
How many Transmission is going to take to know you have low quality 😂
@MrYAMAHA32177
@MrYAMAHA32177 10 ай бұрын
Time will tell. Most new engine designs start out on a positive note but most do not fare well in the long run..
@stug77
@stug77 10 ай бұрын
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's been an engine with cylinder deactivation that has turned out well in the long run. At worst they're regarded as some of the shortest lived engines.
@motorpolitan8884
@motorpolitan8884 10 ай бұрын
Corvette C7?
@watch_kitty
@watch_kitty 10 ай бұрын
Mazda 3?
@andersonrodriguez8258
@andersonrodriguez8258 10 ай бұрын
Agree and coming from gm and their shitty history of 4 cylinders nd deactivation
@NYPATRIOTBX
@NYPATRIOTBX 10 ай бұрын
Agreed, and that’s why the after market offers DOD delete kits.
@theconfused_fisherman
@theconfused_fisherman 10 ай бұрын
My 5.3 is from 2009 with AFM and so far it has held up. I do know the dark side of AFM though bc my dad had a 2008 Avalanche with the same powertrain and he had lots of top end issues all related to AFM. It seems to me that they last about 150k before major issues occur, or they have issues immediately. You can deactivate or trick the system into never triggering AFM but that requires a tune or a plugin from one company for $300. You can also replace the lifters with one piece lifters and a tune and that will make the truck run like it was designed without AFM in the first place
@j.t.schuler7181
@j.t.schuler7181 10 ай бұрын
I work at the Wentzville Gm plant that builds the Canyon and Colorado, thank you for the great review we are proud of what we build.
@vinnier6
@vinnier6 Ай бұрын
Thank you for my 2017 ZR2! 112k on the clock and she is still perfect
@tholbrook422
@tholbrook422 20 күн бұрын
Actually, thank you. I want to the Trail Boss that bad!!!❤️
@j.redbeard99
@j.redbeard99 10 ай бұрын
It will be interesting to see how all these new, turbo 4 cylinder truck engines hold up over the long run. This kind of engine seems appropriate for a mid size truck, but I'd personally rather have a V6. Great content from Savage Geese as always!
@migueralliart
@migueralliart 10 ай бұрын
I agree. Give me a NA v6 anyday.
@terrencejones9817
@terrencejones9817 10 ай бұрын
They have been out since 2019. No major issues so far.
@migueralliart
@migueralliart 10 ай бұрын
@@terrencejones9817 I just want less wastegates and mechanisms to fail. I'll probably keep my tacoma v6 for a long time since toyota ruined the new one with a turbo as well.
@az.chaldean
@az.chaldean 10 ай бұрын
Turbo replacements before 100k miles guarantee it all these new engines have even worse planned obsolescence than anything we’ve had previously. Manufacturers need to post earnings every quarter
@lukewalker1051
@lukewalker1051 10 ай бұрын
They aren't designed to hold up over the 'long run'. The entire car industry is going 4 cyl turbo because they want you to buy a new vehicle out of warranty when they start to fail.
@basithph8958
@basithph8958 10 ай бұрын
Man I can’t wait to see a comparison of the Colorado and Tacoma This is going to be interesting for 4 cylinder trucks
@user-re6yj7gr6j
@user-re6yj7gr6j 10 ай бұрын
The biggest problem I see is that they're probably not going to last over 150k miles before needing a new engine. Whereas a good 8 cylinder will last over 300k.
@basithph8958
@basithph8958 10 ай бұрын
@@user-re6yj7gr6j Good point ig time will tell
@pdx650
@pdx650 10 ай бұрын
I will not own a newer toyota tacoma with the 2GR-FKS v-6 engine. has DI and Port injectors. Port alone is perfectly fine to go with. DI has too many problems.
@Angry_Gnome
@Angry_Gnome 9 ай бұрын
@@user-re6yj7gr6jYou don't know that though. The same crap was said when Ford came out with the 3.5 Ecoboost. Those engines have evolved and proven themselves. GM can't afford to screw this engine up. My money is on this engine being a durable workhorse.
@mcnuggetapple
@mcnuggetapple 3 ай бұрын
@@user-re6yj7gr6jI’m sure they’ll be fine, they’re pretty big for a 4 cylinder
@HDpackage
@HDpackage 10 ай бұрын
Direct Injection and variable displacement are old problems for GM. The new ones are electric water pump, variable displacement oil pump and apparently electric transmission pumps. Great content, nobody does this kinda depth, just wish Jack gone deaper since he was already so far down the tech rabit hole.
@HailCaesar-lm4bq
@HailCaesar-lm4bq 10 ай бұрын
All those plastic manifolds etc on cars start to crack and warp as plastic degrades with heat .
@ethereous
@ethereous 10 ай бұрын
I really cannot believe they went with an electronic water pump. After decades of issues with BMW, VW and others have had with them, GM getting in this late to the game is just baffling. They even use PLASTIC! They'll be scheduled, early, preventative maintenance without a doubt.
@faheemabbas3965
@faheemabbas3965 10 ай бұрын
Planned obsolescence… keep your old car for as long as you can. Even the globally-beloved Toyota will make their newer cars break more often than older ones. Most new cars are a scam. Lexus IS500, for example, is probably one of the last new cars where reliability is truly guaranteed since it’s technically so old.
@lukewalker1051
@lukewalker1051 10 ай бұрын
@@faheemabbas3965 Nailed. Smacks of it. New vehicles are Iphones. When they start to break and engineers who design them know when that is based upon development testing, you either dump the truck out of warranty or pay for it twice when things start to break and they will break like clockwork after 4 year warranty. AFM on a 4 cylinder really? Is GM that desperate for CAFE?...that they will compromise engine durability by shutting off the inner cylinders at cruise? Direct injection = dirty valves no matter what the architecture. Electric fuel pump. Industry is going 4 cylinder to lower fuel consumption, increase engine temps and pressure, everything made of out plastic aka BMW and will fail at higher mileage. Planned obsolescence.
@Cassinspace
@Cassinspace 10 ай бұрын
​@lukewalker1051 don't worry about DI, they've got an overengineered PCV system and an intake port that generates tornado of air over the valve that'll just blow the oil right off 😂😂 give me a break. Even with a catch can its a matter of WHEN, not IF carbon builds up on the valve
@andrewnickds
@andrewnickds 10 ай бұрын
Much respect for that interview. I don't even have an interest in trucks but hearing what they had to say about their engineering of this product made me respect GM and their engineer teams just a little bit more now. Jack kept digging for more details and info and we all got rewarded for it. Great review, this is exactly why this is my favorite KZfaq automotive channel by far.
@heathergreylive
@heathergreylive 10 ай бұрын
GM Jack did a great job of condensing lots of information.
@r1ckz0mb0
@r1ckz0mb0 10 ай бұрын
The man wears 2 hats: GM and B58. Today was GM hat day.
@jackholmes8105
@jackholmes8105 10 ай бұрын
@@r1ckz0mb0did someone say b58?
@GoFastGator
@GoFastGator 10 ай бұрын
I really appreciate the thought that went into this new engine and the journalism that made all of this information available to us, John Q Public. That said, I'd be a lot more excited for an inline 6, perhaps running lower boost levels than the I4, especially as a base engine in the Silverado/Sierra. Interesting that they went to the trouble to have an electric aux pump for pre-charging the transmission but didn't take that step on the engine and get oil to the turbo bearings, mains/rods, and top end before the engine even turns over.
@akdomun
@akdomun 10 ай бұрын
That would make an engine last forever! Bad for business.
@GoFastGator
@GoFastGator 10 ай бұрын
@@akdomun you know, I don't think it would matter much. Hardly anybody replaces a car because it has mechanically worn out. I think they'll trade out/up every 4- 7 years (or whenever the warranty is up) regardless.
@beaches2mountains230
@beaches2mountains230 10 ай бұрын
​@GoFastGator CLEARLY YOUR AVOIDING AN ENTIRE SEGMENT OF THE MARKET WITH THOSE REMARKS..LOW INCOME PEOPLE HAVE VEHICLES WEAR OUT FROM OLD AGE..MY BUDDY HAS A DEALERSHIP OF PRE OWNED AND JUST TALK TO A GUY LIKE THAT AND YOULL HEAR ALL ABOUT IT. IF A CAR BECOMES MORE EXPENSIVE TO FIX THAN WHAT ITS WORTH, ITS "WORN OUT"..WITH ALL OF THE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS AND INCREASED COMPLEXITY THIS IS HAPPENING MORE NOW THAN EVER JUST LOOK AT THE GERMAN ENGINEERED STUFF IN JUNK YARDS.
@pan4632
@pan4632 10 ай бұрын
I know Jack was resisting the urge to mention the B58 to the engineer
@oOgy172
@oOgy172 10 ай бұрын
God I'm experiencing hair loss just thinking about a B58 Colorado and Silverado
@JohnSmith-lf4be
@JohnSmith-lf4be 10 ай бұрын
Please explain
@2lightfoundation721
@2lightfoundation721 10 ай бұрын
I remember the days when all it took to understand an engine basically came down to intake, compression, power, exhaust. Now, it’s turbos, direct injection, cylinder deactivation and all of this ancillary and computerized crap attached to the engine to manage and control certain functions like load management etc. From an engineering standpoint, it’s absolutely stunning and amazing. You’ve got to have an absolutely brilliant mind to come up with and understand some of these modern engines and mechanical marvels. From a practical standpoint, these new technologies wind up costing the consumer more money on the front end as vehicles become more expensive and the backend in terms of repairs, longevity/reliability. Long term, It winds up cancelling out any gains in fuel economy.
@ohrandyrandy
@ohrandyrandy 10 ай бұрын
Couldn't have said it better myself. It comes down to cost, if GM is placing these everywhere (Traverse and Enclave are next), this could only mean one thing... it's dirt cheap for them to do so and may the consumer beware.
@hollywoodhitch6678
@hollywoodhitch6678 10 ай бұрын
Going to do a write up on this soon. Everyone seems to be asleep at the wheel, especially politicans. If I had the money I would be hoarding older, clean, reliable vehicles that would last a lifetime. Cost per mile is going to go way up for everyone and politicians are behind it all.
@josholsen6985
@josholsen6985 10 ай бұрын
I hear ya. The electric coolant pump is a bit disconcerting. Did they take the steps to do a brushless design? I doubt it. That being said I’ve had practice changing belt driven pumps on GM V8s. The standard weep hole leak failure. It’s not a difficult repair provided that you can get the f&@king fan nut to break free.
@humanbeans7952
@humanbeans7952 10 ай бұрын
I love late 90's early 2000's vehicles for this exact reason. Just enough technology to be efficient enough without creating too many things to go wrong. The efficiency of modern engines is impressive, even if I have the right to repair some of these things i wouldn't want to
@ofmyownaccord
@ofmyownaccord 2 ай бұрын
Remember when all you had to do was feed a horse grass and give it water? Pretty sure all these new internal combustion engines are going to be too complex and expensive for the average person. Oh wait....
@jeffer1101
@jeffer1101 10 ай бұрын
Initially, I wasn't a big fan of large displacement 4 cylinder engines and I wasn't expecting much from the 2.7T used here either. I thought it was just a big cheap 4 cylinder for compliance and EPA ratings. However, listening to the GM guy talk about all the engineering and development that went into all aspects of this engine really changed my mind. Since the engine was designed this way from the beginning, it is likely going to be better than other engines that simply added a turbo to them. Add in small details like the electric water pump to cool the turbo even after you turn the vehicle off, and it seems like they really did work to not only maximize what they can get out of the engine, but also try to keep things as reliable as possible.
@GoldenCroc
@GoldenCroc 10 ай бұрын
Just curious, what are some examples of other engines that "simply added a turbo"?
@cormaro13
@cormaro13 10 ай бұрын
Yea good luck with that you'll still have pvc problems 😂
@jeffer1101
@jeffer1101 10 ай бұрын
@@GoldenCroc I meant more in terms of how it used to be done. Although, the SkyActiv 2.5L engines from Mazda could likely still be an example of this.
@jeffer1101
@jeffer1101 10 ай бұрын
@@cormaro13 It's PCV, but it looks like they addressed that in this new engine (we'll have to see how it works long term though).
@garboi8976
@garboi8976 10 ай бұрын
@@GoldenCrocford 3.5 eco boost motor. The 2.7 v6 is so much better made because it was made for boost. The 3.5 had boost added later which exasperated components that weren’t made for that.
@vr4787
@vr4787 10 ай бұрын
Just to be aware the software updates have caused some issues where it gets stuck, restarts constantly to where it drains the battery. There’s already reports of people having to have the whole entertainment system replaced cause of this. It basically leaves you stranded since it’s an integrated system.
@MLHunt
@MLHunt 10 ай бұрын
It is amazing how long it has taken the legacy OEMs to realize their control systems design needed to be a lot more robust at the top level. Too much embedded subsystem/CAN bus level thinking. I own 2 MY 1 MMEs, and it's only after over a year since launch that Ford is beginning to get its act together around OTAing updates to the car. Ford CEO Jim Farley publicly conceded they weren't prepared and hadn't hired enough sw guys. Combination of arrogance, NIH thinking, and Tesla making it look easy I guess. Whatever the cause it's definitely an engineering management failure.
@JollyGiant19
@JollyGiant19 10 ай бұрын
@@MLHuntYeah, the OEMs seem to think software is easy and something they can just update later after they get the important stuff right. But the whole software stack is an important part now! It’s so aggravating knowing how much better it could be if management didn’t have blinders on
@MLHunt
@MLHunt 10 ай бұрын
Even if they couldn't get the OTA to download and install, they still should be able to reprogram the dysfunctioning modules with a plug-in programming tool. When the only way you can figure to fix a software issue is to replace the misbehaving hardware, clearly something is broken in how you manage and deploy software. And when something you should be able to fix with a just a few tech labor hours can only be fixed by replacement of $1000s worth of hardware and many more technician labor hours, that's obviously really bad business-wise.
@hondahirny
@hondahirny 10 ай бұрын
My Ford has that issue. Modern cars are rolling computers. I found some useful workarounds that make this quite manageable, but it is darn annoying to have to worry about it at all. My older (80’s and 90’s) vehicles only had that issue if you left your headlights on 😊
@kamilb8232
@kamilb8232 10 ай бұрын
​@MLHunt Why don't you think they can't reprogram using OBDII? Although if you worked an OEM or supplier you should know things like infotainment are usually too large file sizes to update over a CAN bus and they utilize USB updates. Dealers are always HW swap happy. Getting them to flash anything in service is unlikely.
@yayinternets
@yayinternets 10 ай бұрын
The way this engine is designed, it reminds me a lot of how reliable 4 cylinder diesels are built for tractors and so forth. This could end-up being as legendary as the LS. Thanks for such a great deep dive. Edit: I commented before I finished the video and I see I wasn't the only one thinking about this as built like a diesel engine. 😂
@tkin1973
@tkin1973 10 ай бұрын
I'm sure the engineers did their part but the achilles heel for this truck is going the bean counters and other GM execs and what they end up f'n up.
@Josh-cw8by
@Josh-cw8by 10 ай бұрын
It would be comparable to Mitsubishi's 4G63T. The 2JZ of 4 cylinder engines.
@yayinternets
@yayinternets 10 ай бұрын
@@Josh-cw8by Absolutely, great point! Didn't even think about that even though I should have. I owned a couple of 1G DSMs in the late 90s/early 00s.. currently own a unicorn 99 3000GT VR4. 🙂
@yayinternets
@yayinternets 10 ай бұрын
@@tkin1973 Yeah, I definitely agree. I haven't owned any American cars since I was a teen for good reason. I can't imagine spending as much as Ford's cost right now yet still get stuck with so many problems.
@adamgroszkiewicz814
@adamgroszkiewicz814 10 ай бұрын
Legendary as an LS? IDK man....seems like Legendary as a diesel to me. I don't think getting a 2.7 I4 to rev up to 9k is ever going to happen.
@duffyt26
@duffyt26 10 ай бұрын
One of the best video you ever uploaded! Love mechanical and engineering deep-dives, especially by a good speaker such as this gentleman from GM! Thank you Geese'n'Gorillas 🙏
@JimboJason
@JimboJason 10 ай бұрын
Kind of interesting he made the case for how important oiling is for a turbo motor, and the took off the piston oil sprayers off of the work truck motor. I know there is a reason for it, but it doesn't seem like an area where I would make a cost cutting decision.
@tom30
@tom30 10 ай бұрын
My guess is that the oil squirters are more for cooling than lubrication. Since the WT is lower power it doesn't run as hot?
@v8_sami
@v8_sami 10 ай бұрын
Also they mentioned they had to pass emissions. As the oil sprayers increases fuel consumptions.
@Dowlphin
@Dowlphin 10 ай бұрын
@@v8_sami They said they increase emissions. Dunno how fuel consumption would be affected, but to me it sounded like a thinly veiled hint that spraying oil there might increase the amount burned. And burned oil really does mess up emissions.
@ryantyniec1081
@ryantyniec1081 10 ай бұрын
@@tom30 I was thinking that could be the case. However (I am not an automotive engineer), I remember older redblock Volvo engines with oil squirters (I think 1993+) usually experience a lot less piston slap as they age compared to older engines without them. I think most turbo redblocks always had them. Obviously take that with a big grain of salt.
@doabarrellroll69
@doabarrellroll69 10 ай бұрын
​@@Dowlphinburning oil increases emissions significantly, iirc it's one of the main reasons why Mazda killed the Renesis rotary: they used oil to lubricate the apex seals but in turn were pretty bad in mission control because of it
@domdrty
@domdrty 10 ай бұрын
Does it come with lifter failure like the 5.3L/6.2L, then GM fights you tooth and nail to not repair/replace the engine? Can't wait.
@user-yj7ph9vk2k
@user-yj7ph9vk2k 10 ай бұрын
There will be more failures than that
@theglowcloud2215
@theglowcloud2215 10 ай бұрын
Government Motors fighting repairs? Never! Worst carmaker out there, and that's saying a LOT when you're in competition with the likes of Dodge/Ram/Jeep/every other Stellantis sub-brand under the sun.
@carbonking53
@carbonking53 10 ай бұрын
Do you equally bad mouth Ford, Ram, and Toyota for all their prior issues, recalls, and disputes with owners over warranty coverage? I've got a list as long as my leg to back up all the issues every brand has had.
@ne2i
@ne2i 10 ай бұрын
It's a totally different system.
@Zuudoh
@Zuudoh 10 ай бұрын
i guess time will tell.
@ChurchAutoTest
@ChurchAutoTest 10 ай бұрын
Terrific content and interviews. And I appreciate how you manage the PR speak vs. tough questions with the factory reps. That said, it's a really hard sell to take a 2.7 I4 over the DI 5.3 V8. Will be interesting to see how the used truck market fares over the next couple years. Yeah, corporate and small biz fleets will move on to whatever is cheapest to run as they turn over their 100k-200k mile work trucks, but I suspect the demand for good condition V8s will keep prices high for a long time.
@Markus56165
@Markus56165 10 ай бұрын
Well done boys. I really appreciate the effort and consistency of your work. Because of channels like this one, we’re all much more knowledgeable with these products and I really feel like it helps to hold manufacturers more accountable to the products they’re releasing. Thank you
@dragospahontu
@dragospahontu 10 ай бұрын
If it fits a light machine gun in the bed, I'm sold.
@kabloosh699
@kabloosh699 10 ай бұрын
I see you want a modern technical.
@Dowlphin
@Dowlphin 10 ай бұрын
Comes with the armor plate upgrade for civil war.
@dragospahontu
@dragospahontu 10 ай бұрын
@@Dowlphin Civil War Limited Edition
@fortheloveofnoise9298
@fortheloveofnoise9298 10 ай бұрын
​@@dragospahontuonly available in blue or red
@Dowlphin
@Dowlphin 10 ай бұрын
@@dragospahontu Limited to 300 million vehicles.
@user-wm1xm5gm2k
@user-wm1xm5gm2k 10 ай бұрын
I appreciate the depth you guys go into these new trucks. So much more detail than every other youtuber
@christopherallen1138
@christopherallen1138 10 ай бұрын
Makes me want a new Dakota with the 3.0 Hurricane engine. It would be the best mid size truck experience for 5,000 miles before all the factory recalls and quality defects permanently garage it at the dealer.
@ettiennenathan
@ettiennenathan 10 ай бұрын
Life is too short to drive reliable cars😂😂
@sho942000
@sho942000 10 ай бұрын
You're confused with a Ford.
@johnsimun6533
@johnsimun6533 10 ай бұрын
You don’t want to find new roads?
@dr._breens_beard
@dr._breens_beard 10 ай бұрын
​@@ettiennenathanit is but rent, mortgages, healthcare, and general inflation kinda forced our hand. Im just waiting for everyone whos buying cars at these prices to lose rediculous amounts of money on em when both the market crashes and the "tech" thats in em goes into a perpetual cycle of giving up the ghost
@ettiennenathan
@ettiennenathan 10 ай бұрын
I agree with you. My comment was mainly satirical. I drive an outdated Toyota and 20 year old BMW.
@coolaa7
@coolaa7 10 ай бұрын
Love the conversation with the engine engineer. 👍🏽
@evildrizzt1
@evildrizzt1 10 ай бұрын
It definitely convinced me not to buy this truck. That engine won’t last in an actual work environment. 😅
@lukewalker1051
@lukewalker1051 10 ай бұрын
@@evildrizzt1 True. Automotive engineer here. Anything normally aspriated is better. Lower tech = more longevity. New vehicles are designed to fail out of warranty.
@colin-nekritz
@colin-nekritz 10 ай бұрын
I weirdly like it, the look of it, the engine, seems like an honest truck. If only it was priced like an honest truck, but there is no more honestly priced vehicles.
@BeefIngot
@BeefIngot 10 ай бұрын
They grabbed us by the balls years ago with the lobbying that brought about the level of car centric it you appreciate every day on your morning commute.
@TCPUDPATM
@TCPUDPATM 10 ай бұрын
“Honest” is a myth.
@rifleslol
@rifleslol 10 ай бұрын
I don't think they're particularly "overpriced" in relation to other consumer goods. Definitely artificially inflated but wages not keeping up is the biggest problem IMO.
@BeefIngot
@BeefIngot 10 ай бұрын
@@rifleslol The biggest problem is people don't see the inflating wealth inequality as the main problem.
@rifleslol
@rifleslol 10 ай бұрын
@@BeefIngot Agreed
@GERONIMO326
@GERONIMO326 10 ай бұрын
Man I tell you what, your all's videos never cease to amaze me. So very fortunate to be able to gorge myself with the information you all give. Much appreciated, yet again.
@guymann4016
@guymann4016 10 ай бұрын
Toyota guy here. But man, I sure root for the big 3 to succeed. I really hope they can be known for reliability and longevity.
@cgrist7000
@cgrist7000 10 ай бұрын
Dude seems knowledgeable and he’s rockin’ a classic SKX009….! If this truck is as reliable as his watch they may have a new customer:)
@simedogz
@simedogz 10 ай бұрын
Really like when you guys interview the engineers. kudos
@eric97909
@eric97909 10 ай бұрын
You guys truly do car reviews like no other, appreciate what y’all do!
@ChrisJones-yh2os
@ChrisJones-yh2os 10 ай бұрын
Wow, these interviews can be so amazing when you get the right person, someone who truly knows the details of the design. Awesome!
@SuzukiKid400
@SuzukiKid400 10 ай бұрын
Great video. Love your interviews with engineers. His input on catch cans, PCV systems and cleaning the valves was very interesting.
@austinwood468
@austinwood468 10 ай бұрын
Would love to see a video like this with a rep from company more known for its engineering excellence. This guy offers some keen insights into GM, but I’ll probably never buy a GM product. I would love an engineering talk on the evolution of the Toyota hybrid drive or the Porsche 911 powerplants. Still, this video is close to the best thing on KZfaq. Great work.
@sc3ku
@sc3ku 3 ай бұрын
there is! Motormouth interviewed the Tacoma chief engineer about the 2024 with the new turbo 4
@dlygrind
@dlygrind 10 ай бұрын
I'm a recent, and huge, SG fan. This is a perfect example of why. I have no interest in trucks, and generally not in GM product. But the info you uncovered and presented really made me appreciate this truck, this engine, and the engineers behind both. Really top notch production. Great work Jack!!!
@johnbinder6988
@johnbinder6988 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for another excellent deep dive. I hope more manufacturers get on board with you guys for more of these in the future.
@smallfact0ry921
@smallfact0ry921 10 ай бұрын
It's great to hear from the engineers and their insights. That being the case, I'd certainly give it 2 years minimum on any new drive train. Although even still: my wife's 2019 civic 1.5 turbo was apparently the first year it was "fixed" after the 2016-2018 oil dilution issues. Well, now at 105,000 miles, she's at the point where she is getting light headed driving it from the gas fumes coming into the cabin. The dipstick smells like a gas can. Gonna change the oil one more time and dump it for a Toyota with no turbo and the dual injection. My N/A tacoma seems to be just fine....
@crow_2k11beatsbydre8
@crow_2k11beatsbydre8 10 ай бұрын
Toyotas quality isnt like years ago (1990-2015), all OEMs in the auto industry are using cheaper parts to maximize earnings.........
@user-3tf67bk46u
@user-3tf67bk46u 10 ай бұрын
I asked these guys this very question on their recent test of the new CRV. They admitted they didn't know for sure. There is so much misinformation about this it astounds me. Only posts like yours with real experience tells us, software upgrades and band-aiding hasn't done squat. I really wanted to like a new Honda with tons more torque at low revs and much better fuel economy and even quicker acceleration, than my old 2.4 but still, nothing modern beats it, not when all things factored in. I wish rust wasn't an issue. Those who live where salt doesn't disintegrate their vehicle are so fortunate. The issue really is for those who do much fewer than average miles per year. For some, they have a 19 year old car that still only has 80k miles. Everything works including original air conditioning but underneath, rust is front and center an issue even though the paint is like new still in 98% of the places. CAFE and EPA and government that caters to the agendas are the crux of all of our disgruntlements. Factor in being overcharged 35 to 40!% for what's available to us in this particularly shitty period of vehicle ownership and you've got a hot mess with no end in sight. Unprecedented times we're witnessing.
@TheBandit7613
@TheBandit7613 10 ай бұрын
These turbo engines contaminate the oil fast. That means very frequent oil changes.
@habpar6531
@habpar6531 10 ай бұрын
Likely injector o-rings need to be replaced. I've seen this on several DI cars where you can smell gas in the cabin once they get older.
@smallfact0ry921
@smallfact0ry921 10 ай бұрын
@@user-3tf67bk46u We had a 1999 civic that went 300k with just routine maintenance (then sold it running fine). Then a 2001 civic that went 200k with just routine maintenance. Sold that 2001 (again, running fine) for a 2014 Impreza (we live in the snowy northeast) but had a lot of quality control issues, and figured we'd go back to that reliable Honda product we always enjoyed. The car itself is built well, and has no rattles or weird quality issues at 105k, but their drivetrain is no longer built for long term reliability. This car lives a best case scenario as well, as we always changed the oil at 5k even though I believe Honda requires it a 10k. It also drives for 45-minutes to work, then 45 minutes home, all highway. No short trips, so it stays at operating temperature for most of its life. It would be a good lease car I suppose...
@stevemartegani
@stevemartegani 10 ай бұрын
The sit down discussion about the design of the engine was VERY enjoyable. Might have been one of your best engineering segments yet.
@jonray8429
@jonray8429 10 ай бұрын
I really appreciate these deep dives with engineers and other professionals. Thanks for the insights!
@ttinnovations3310
@ttinnovations3310 10 ай бұрын
Thanks for all the Great Videos with Real Content that Took Work to Create 🎉
@RealAvus
@RealAvus 10 ай бұрын
I still have PTSD on anything with cylinder deactivation. I definitely take the wait and see approach.
@matthewschneller3587
@matthewschneller3587 10 ай бұрын
Now THIS is a detailed review 👌
@daleheinz8767
@daleheinz8767 4 ай бұрын
Just found your channel. Outstanding reviews and a cut above the breadth and depth that most other channels go into. Not full of pomp and filler, but you guys really hit the nuts and bolts that potential buyers should know when considering any of the vehicles you review. This video in particular, is the best and most comprehensive ZR2 review I’ve seen yet. Very much appreciated, gentlemen.
@rizzodefrank
@rizzodefrank 10 ай бұрын
My dad just got the 2.7 in the Silverado and is really liking it. Good economy and tows his boat just fine. He had the 3.7 before and it had lots of dealer visits
@differenttigers
@differenttigers 10 ай бұрын
I'm a tacoma fanboy but for the first time ever I really like the GM offerings, they seem to have done a real good job with them
@briancorreia2923
@briancorreia2923 10 ай бұрын
I see cost cutting. It’s a 4 cylinder because it’s cheaper and easier to fit in an engine bay. I don’t buy the piston diameter per horsepower explanation for a second. I’m thinking it’s a fairly safe bet that Ford’s 2.7 is a more expensive engine. Open deck blocks and high cylinder pressures usually don’t go together. But it’s cheaper for GM to manufacture. Why carry on with the 8 speed AT that doesn’t have a good reputation? It’s cheaper for GM. This engine is barely more efficient than the 5.3 V8. But it’s a cheaper for GM than developing a electric hybrid. If valve carbon buildup could be properly solved without adding traditional injectors, along with the direct injectors. Why are other manufacturers still adding additional injectors. I I’m saying I don’t believe the engineers claim that they have created a cheaper solution that works. I know that the timing gear was mentioned, but I’d like the engineer to strait up say “This engine will not break chain guides.” I do appreciate the choice of chains over belts. Especially over wet belts that some engineers think are just fine. I’d like to know. If you were more critical during your GM interview, would you risk losing access to these engineers for future questions?
@pan4632
@pan4632 10 ай бұрын
all facts
@SyrupCanuck
@SyrupCanuck 10 ай бұрын
This motor has been through 2 generations and has done extremely well in the full size. My friend has had 2 and currently on a 22 Trail boss and loves the 2. 7
@montecarloss305
@montecarloss305 10 ай бұрын
Appreciate the deep dives on the engines and stuff you guys do. Might be a long shot and I don't know if anyone there would be interested in helping you guys out, but it would be nice to see a send off type of video for the Challenger and Camaro with some of the people who helped design them, as they are sunsetting this year.
@uGotGot1618
@uGotGot1618 10 ай бұрын
I love almost everything about this truck. HOWEVER, it may be that I am hung like a field mouse, but I do struggle with the idea of having a 4cyl truck- especially at the ZR2 price point.
@Moonless6491
@Moonless6491 10 ай бұрын
For me it's a question of reliability with the components around the engines in the long term. I've got a truck that's 28 years old and another that's 22. I wonder if these engines will be able to be kept so long.
@evildrizzt1
@evildrizzt1 10 ай бұрын
@@Moonless6491They won’t. More profitable to the company that you have to buy another truck after warranty expires than to create a reliable one that lasts decades.
@Dowlphin
@Dowlphin 10 ай бұрын
Question: Do you need a truck? (If not, then the 4-popper style clash would be less distinct.)
@andtherye4580
@andtherye4580 10 ай бұрын
​@@Moonless6491if done right, they can last, Toyota makes a turbo diesel 2.8l 4cyl and they're pretty reliable for the torque they make
@skipbreakfast
@skipbreakfast 10 ай бұрын
You can struggle with it but it's all in your head. A modern 4-cylinder will slay a traditional V8.
@lkjh00on89
@lkjh00on89 10 ай бұрын
Appreciate the deep dive, but GM must appreciate the opportunity as well. This will be a great video to revisit in 6 years.
@ghostindamachine
@ghostindamachine 10 ай бұрын
Real automotive journalism! Kudos!
@AndrewBeveridge461
@AndrewBeveridge461 10 ай бұрын
"Nice cylindrical bores". Always a great feature to have.
@munishpersaud3631
@munishpersaud3631 10 ай бұрын
this just made me more excited for you guys to review the new taco, landcruiser, and gx550.
@aprtur
@aprtur 10 ай бұрын
The first two, yeah, but the GX550 is getting the TT V6, not the iForce Max 4 cylinder hybrid drivetrain.
@Chevra2448
@Chevra2448 10 ай бұрын
I really do love how these truck look. The interior is amazing compared to previous years. But I don't think I can give up my 2.8L Duramax yet. The fuel mileage is just so good and I love everything about it. I will admit that I am having a hard time accepting a 4 cylinder gas engine in a truck (especially a 1/2 ton), but maybe someday I will change.
@carsonhoover5767
@carsonhoover5767 9 ай бұрын
Same here I have the 2.8 bison. 2022. I just love the sound of a diesel over a gas. Now the new 23’s look great just wish GM would have kept the diesel option. Cause I’d be banging my down payment on their desk yelling take my money. But sadly they don’t so I’ll be working towards being a million mile club member.
@kaiboshvanhortonsnort359
@kaiboshvanhortonsnort359 10 ай бұрын
I love this format, keep up the fantastic work boys.
@noabclements3256
@noabclements3256 10 ай бұрын
Thanks guys, that was very interesting and useful info. I appreciate the peak behind the curtain
@peterdelacruz5650
@peterdelacruz5650 10 ай бұрын
I do hope they fix the oil consumption issues. I had a 2022 Silverado 1500 with the 2.7 HO that I bought brand new. I always let it warm up before getting on it, only towed a 4k Lb uhaul 1200 miles, and generally treated it really nice. It used just over 1 quart of motor oil by 6500 miles. Halfway to my 15,000 mile oil change I had added a quart and near to the change itself had to add another quart. At the 22k oil change I had also added 2 quarts to keep it above low. I never beat on this truck, I kept the autostop off, and generally it was a highway queen. I put on 25k miles in one year of ownership and it burned through almost 5 quarts of oil in that time. It was a large part of why I traded it in. This is obviously anecdotal but I was highly disappointed in the engine.
@goforbroke2
@goforbroke2 10 ай бұрын
I know you were going by the recommended oil change interval, but 15K interval change is way too much. You got rid of the truck but I keep my oil change intervals to 5-6K. Modern cars burn oil because the oil change intervals are too long. I had a brand E350 Benz wagon that was burning oil also, it was on 10K oil changes.
@peterdelacruz5650
@peterdelacruz5650 10 ай бұрын
@@goforbroke2 I must have been unclear, I changed the oil the first time at 6969 miles (I only remember this one because it was a funny accident), then around 15k, lastly around 22k.
@Ntmoffi
@Ntmoffi 10 ай бұрын
​@@peterdelacruz5650that sounds more like it. You're better off changing the oil every 5k max on these newer engines.
@peterdelacruz5650
@peterdelacruz5650 10 ай бұрын
@@Ntmoffi it still should not burn 2 quarts for every 5-7.5k mile interval
@Ntmoffi
@Ntmoffi 10 ай бұрын
@@peterdelacruz5650 well of course it shouldn't.
@tadinator1362
@tadinator1362 10 ай бұрын
Once again, another excellent and informative review. Yes, it looks like Chevy ditched the interior trim that looked like it was designed and cast by playskool. The exterior is sharp, and the interior looks like a place you could spend a day driving and still feel comfortable.
@_Makanko_
@_Makanko_ 10 ай бұрын
As always, very informative!
@eddy67
@eddy67 10 ай бұрын
Great job on the video fellas, you guys are killing it
@JurisKankalis
@JurisKankalis 10 ай бұрын
This is fast.. well - fast - the GEESE guys have been around for literal CENTURIES - turning out to be the most factual, comprehensive and technically informative - outlet/review all things automotive. Because - let's be honest. Who else is there (no, not the song by that Scandinavian band). Throttle House mostly hoon around and report their track times - and perceived "feelings" on the respective product - which is all great - and their production is mind-blowing - but they don't go as much into technical stuff, which is a shame - then there's another Canadian duo - the Straight Pipes - which have turned borderline unwatchable because of questionable (actually questionable) apparel choices - and when it's at that level - it really becomes kinda annoying - then there's the The Fast Lane/TFL Trucks and their channels - which don't achieve the same level of seriousness, somehow, as manifested by the GEESE guys, weirdly enough - and who else? Real large broadcaster/paid former TV channel outlets like Hagerty in US and TopGear in UK? Yeah, maybe - but again, neither of them have ever seen a car lift, it seems. So kuddos to both of the GEESE guys (jeez I just invented an awesome term) - both the OG one - and the immigrated one (I mean... added to the team - not immigrated from Taiwan as he claims) - thanks for the great car and truck content throughout the years - although I'll probably never buy a single car based on your reviews - I've watched 99.9% of the videos - and will keep doing so. Greetings from Latvia, keep up the work.
@dvaritek434
@dvaritek434 10 ай бұрын
Open deck with 27+ lbs of boost. What could go wrong?
@12masterr
@12masterr 10 ай бұрын
Rigth?????
@rightwingsafetysquad9872
@rightwingsafetysquad9872 10 ай бұрын
I don't understand why anyone would design an open deck for an engine intended to have a turbo.
@brandonclark8736
@brandonclark8736 10 ай бұрын
Something, Something "design requirements"@@rightwingsafetysquad9872
@bryan688
@bryan688 10 ай бұрын
Cast aluminum everything and open deck....but "This engine was built for a lot of boost"
@evildrizzt1
@evildrizzt1 10 ай бұрын
All contained in a cast aluminum block? It won’t last long enough to see the warranty expire. 😅
@GoogleUser-qp8mb
@GoogleUser-qp8mb 6 ай бұрын
Love your channel. Great job with the depth and breadth of this review. Keep up the awesome work!
@jerusdc
@jerusdc 10 ай бұрын
Just ordered mine! Can't wait ti get it. Loved my last ZR2
@amogus694
@amogus694 10 ай бұрын
I know that emission standards killed diesels in the USA but this class of trucks would benefit a lot from a diesel engine.
@Hedonistic0Frog
@Hedonistic0Frog 10 ай бұрын
There definitely seems to be a lot of features that could be catastrophic if they're common failure points. Electric water pump, transmission fluid and oil warmed up by coolant which could mix fluids if they fail, Turbocharger wastegate which can leak and linkage which can loosen up, and DI carbon buildup. Time will tell.
@robmunach3870
@robmunach3870 9 ай бұрын
I love how there is an electric pump in the tranny that turns on every time you open the door. WTF?
@mrsteel6136
@mrsteel6136 4 күн бұрын
@@robmunach3870whoops forgot my wallet. Let me go back real quick. Yeah def a wear item hopefully it’s not going to be bad to replace.
@sdp-ui2lw
@sdp-ui2lw 10 ай бұрын
I have a 2.7 Ecoboost V6 in my F150. It's a great engine with amazing power. It's impressive that they made this engine a 4 cylinder.
@Sunnyelm24
@Sunnyelm24 10 ай бұрын
Great video. Lots of information and very well done. Quick question: What were all of the warning beeps for? Were you able to turn them off? Just curious as I've got one on order, and that would get extremely annoying.
@killercan10
@killercan10 10 ай бұрын
I have a 2022.5 Silverado with the 2.7 HO. I love it. Came from a 2018 5.3 Silverado before it. So far in comparing all of my documented fuel economy, I'm up over the 5.3. Per tank fill up MPG I consistently saw 17-18mpg in the spring/summer/fall and 14-15mpg winter with my 5.3. Long trips average MPG most was 20.9. With the 2.7 HO and the same driving styles as before I've not seen less than 17mpg in winter, and spring/summer/fall have been consistently 19-22mpg. Long trips I've been able to pull 23-25mpg for the trip. It tows better and it is as fast if not a hair faster than the 5.3 I had. I drove a 2023 Turbo Plus Colorado and it absolutely blew the 3.6 out of the water. Its the closest we will get to the 2.8 Duramax, minus the impressive MPG that got.
@moabman6803
@moabman6803 10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great real world statistics! Sounds like the 2.7 only gives marginal performance gains over the 5.3 at the cost of complexity. I don't think a 4 cylinder is going to cut it for me.
@killercan10
@killercan10 10 ай бұрын
@@moabman6803 I would say above marginal. Towing is a better experience than the 5.3. It weighs less than an identical truck with a 5.3 and therefore feels every ounce as fast as one (perhaps a tenth or two faster?). Plus, no Dynamic Fuel Management lifters to have concerns over which, is still a thing but perhaps a little less common at the moment. 2020-2022 was a rough patch for the 5.3 and 6.2 and low mileage DFM lifter failures.
@CaptainRex-sl4xk
@CaptainRex-sl4xk 10 ай бұрын
As a former GM fan boy. I hope this 2.7l is as good as promised
@blautens
@blautens 10 ай бұрын
I enjoy these discussions - I've seen this engineer do a few of these. I believe it might turn out to be a reliable engine, but it will be a long time before it eclipses my LS2.
@krasnaludek298
@krasnaludek298 9 ай бұрын
Nice to see you guys step into the truck world, as a lot of us North Americans own both cars & trucks. Just my opinion, but I think GM has hit a grand slam with this Colorado/Canyon offering. The powertrain, capability, & pricing seem to be spot-on with most modern truck buyers’ needs. I’d easily take a GMC Canyon over a Tacoma or Ranger; probably go for the Elevation package in the low $40s US.
@adamgroszkiewicz814
@adamgroszkiewicz814 10 ай бұрын
We're going from a golden age of automotive performance to a future of big displacement, low rev turbo 4's & hybrids + EV's. Can't help but be glad I'll always be old enough to remember the days of 809348 Hellcat versions & rip snorting Focus RS's.
@clifftaylor3295
@clifftaylor3295 10 ай бұрын
YES. Give us all the content. We love it.
@BobcatSig
@BobcatSig 7 ай бұрын
This engineer is responsible for the design of this super cool engine and he’s rocking a Seiko SKX009. Love it.
@slocavky
@slocavky 10 ай бұрын
Going to be honest here. I love the new Colorado for sure. and this is the hands down best video you all have done in a while. Keep this style going for sure. Good job
@jackwilkinson9253
@jackwilkinson9253 10 ай бұрын
Crazy that these boys have finally found out high boost small aluminum block engines and hybrid tech after a lengthy Honda deal👀
@Theonedjneo
@Theonedjneo 10 ай бұрын
I swear; at the rate we're heading, everyone is going to be driving semi trucks with 4000 hp 4 cylinders
@kylebatzer353
@kylebatzer353 10 ай бұрын
I really want to hear Jack's opinion about how much effort went into/how good the upcoming Tacoma is once you guys have had your week with it. I have a feeling it's gonna be a big change if heart.
@Holden-McGroin
@Holden-McGroin 10 ай бұрын
I recently had a Silverado with this engine in it for about a week and I was absolutely blown away by how good it is. It really is a shame that they dropped the 6 foot bed in the Colorado, because that is going to force us into either a Silverado or a different brand. I don’t mind the Silverado, currently have one with the 5.3 L, but I really don’t need a full-size truck, just a 6 foot bed.
@GIGABACHI
@GIGABACHI 10 ай бұрын
Vote with your money and let them know. 👌👀
@tom30
@tom30 10 ай бұрын
Starting to save money to replace my aging 90's Ford Ranger. The LT trim level of this truck actually seems obtainable for an average buyer.
@Traysandor
@Traysandor 10 ай бұрын
Obtainable =/= Good Long Term Investment
@JJ-mh3hb
@JJ-mh3hb 10 ай бұрын
@@Traysandor 99% of vehicles are depreciating assets. what's your point?
@tim3172
@tim3172 10 ай бұрын
@@TraysandorYou don't buy a vehicle to "invest". It will only ever cost you money unless you use it for a business.
@android175
@android175 10 ай бұрын
@@Traysandor Cars arent investments. Go buy gold or something
@Ntmoffi
@Ntmoffi 10 ай бұрын
I have an 05 Ranger and I'm saving my money to buy a 2010 or 2011 Ranger. I wouldn't touch one of these new trucks with a 10' pole.
@bach1750
@bach1750 10 ай бұрын
Props to Kevin for wearing a Seiko SKX!!! 1:00
@brucesuitt993
@brucesuitt993 10 ай бұрын
Ha! I thought I was the only one who zoomed in to check.
@cgrist7000
@cgrist7000 10 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 I’m🤓just made a post saying the same thing🫡
@mahdavimail
@mahdavimail 10 ай бұрын
Very very smart choice for video. I was looking for this explanation for the engine. To compare with Taco. Thanks
@ApacheRambo
@ApacheRambo 10 ай бұрын
Excellent video! Thank you for the info
@12masterr
@12masterr 10 ай бұрын
They will be awesome till the warranty expires!
@Arkeo36
@Arkeo36 10 ай бұрын
I am a broken record at this point, but cash-strapped Nissan could instantly jump to the top of almost everyone's mid size truck list by just installing the 5.6 v8 from the now-cancelled Titan into the Frontier. The truck will run a million years, will cost the company basically nothing, and will satisfy the actual market demands of shoppers in the segment.
@12masterr
@12masterr 10 ай бұрын
@Arkeo36 honestly I don't know if is the Japanese division or the American division that are completely idiots! Also imagine a new xterra with the frontier looks and either tje v6 twin turbo or the v8!
@user-3tf67bk46u
@user-3tf67bk46u 10 ай бұрын
@@Arkeo36 Just like those who pine for an inline 6 in this Colorado, beyond cost is weight and handling. The Frontier in 2 WD already feels front heavy. The V8 would exasperate that feeling. And it's not the most fuel efficient 5.6 by any stretch. Nissan should go back to their name Datsun, if they really want to leave some of their unpleasant joint ventures behind them. And strike a deal with Aesin no matter how much Toyota might charge them. There's a chance for Nissan..at least they don't insist on selling boxers.
@tim3172
@tim3172 10 ай бұрын
@@Arkeo36Shoppers are "demanding" a 13MPG midsize truck? Or People are squawking about how they'd definitely buy one?
@tim3172
@tim3172 10 ай бұрын
@@user-3tf67bk46u (exacerbate...)
@letsgocapsbeatpens
@letsgocapsbeatpens 10 ай бұрын
"We focused on value" - Kevin Luchansky, Assistant Chief Engineer at GM Great, this motor won't last.
@fortheloveofnoise9298
@fortheloveofnoise9298 10 ай бұрын
obviously
@Eminetics
@Eminetics 10 ай бұрын
That’s the goal.. buy this LS swap it and throw this motor in the trash 😅
@Linknelson
@Linknelson 10 ай бұрын
I’m more interested to see the reliability in the tech and interior inside after 5+ years. It looks really nice brand new. GM really nailed the design, an other awesome video and great info on the new engine.
@The_Stick
@The_Stick 10 ай бұрын
Nice job on the interview.
@matthewshultz8762
@matthewshultz8762 10 ай бұрын
14:10 an electric water pump is actually a great accessory. It can vary the speed and flow of coolant through the engine and in conjunction with the temp gauge in the radiator provide quicker engine warmup in cold temps and better cooling in hot temps, especially in low RPM high load. Great change for GM imo.
@kevinbarry71
@kevinbarry71 10 ай бұрын
In principle you are correct, unfortunately the reality is the General Motors likes to make everything as cheap as they can. So failure is prescribed
@thEM1ghtyricer
@thEM1ghtyricer 10 ай бұрын
Everything is great until it breaks and all replacement parts are nationally backordered.
@siddharthgoyal4008
@siddharthgoyal4008 10 ай бұрын
​@@thEM1ghtyricerideally electric water pump shouldn't break because it for most cases would need to run very light.
@12masterr
@12masterr 10 ай бұрын
@siddharthgoyal4008 yes,it will never break because only runs %100 of the time, light load or not! Knowing gm they cheapen out 30 cents and made the insides all plastic.
@OPMDK
@OPMDK 10 ай бұрын
I hope you have to remove the transmission to access the water pump
@lopincol
@lopincol 10 ай бұрын
I'll stick with a NA V8 thank you. Good video quality as always SG
@jeep6242
@jeep6242 8 ай бұрын
Everybody says that like the lifters don't all fail constantly. I'll never really understand that attitude. N/A V8s have proven chronic issues but they get treated like they are rock solid.
@Liplip40
@Liplip40 10 ай бұрын
Cool package. That said, seeing those Multimatics with the leaf spring is a trip
@AP-jl2lv
@AP-jl2lv 10 ай бұрын
love the music in this one, very calming
@joeblow701
@joeblow701 10 ай бұрын
Open deck + 27lbs of boost + thermal cycling…..we’ll see….at least the water pump can run post shutdown….Porsche 944 had that in the 80s.
@rw0037
@rw0037 10 ай бұрын
The engine is least of my worries on this thing. Is cruise control standard on this $40k+ truck yet? Headlight controls still buried in-screen on a submenu? Did they fix the screen blackout issues? Economy car levels of quality for luxury car prices, gotta love what midsize trucks have become.
@Bonanzaking
@Bonanzaking 10 ай бұрын
Uhh inflation has moved that luxury upstream. Before 20k used to be exotic car pricing. Think the dussenberg 20k, a great depression era car that cost 20k or roughly 10 houses. 20k now gets you a maverick, or the cheapest kia’s.
@FXIIBeaver
@FXIIBeaver 10 ай бұрын
Just leave them in auto like you already do.
@NotAnonymousNo80014
@NotAnonymousNo80014 10 ай бұрын
@@FXIIBeaver Your options will soon be this or a cyber truck, that is if you like door wedge shaped trucks.
@FXIIBeaver
@FXIIBeaver 10 ай бұрын
@@NotAnonymousNo80014 cyber truck is never releasing but keep dreaming.
@PeakDecline
@PeakDecline 10 ай бұрын
Depends on trim. Cruise control is standard on a ZR2. Its in a cheap option package for the less expensive trims. I know by your comment you watch TFL... that was honestly more a screw up Andre and his dealers' part. If they had realized when ordering it was just a cheap option they would have checked that box and you would have never thought about this at all. Likewise there isn't an "screen blackout issue." Yes, again, I know Andre's truck had that issue but this isn't some systemic problem.
@LGMARG1983
@LGMARG1983 10 ай бұрын
This videos make this channel different, thank you.
@stoneeh
@stoneeh 10 ай бұрын
Awesome car, awesome review. Thumbs up guys, as always.
@docholliday6285
@docholliday6285 10 ай бұрын
Truly an exceptional review. I was on the fence between this & Taco, until Colorado was unveiled July '22. Slam dunk decision for me. Looks like GM knocked this out of the park. My ZR2 will be delivered this week.
@bender2033
@bender2033 10 ай бұрын
My first car was a 1968 Chevelle that I paid 800$ for. Since then I have had zero interest in Chevrolet offerings.... until now. This new colorado in TrailBoss trim for 40k seems reasonable-ish given the current market. Kudos to the team, I'll definitely be checking one out once they hit the lots.
@qx4n9e1xp
@qx4n9e1xp 10 ай бұрын
While the engineer was taking about development of the engine, I could swear, it almost sounded like they were trying to make this engine so good, that it comes the next "LS Swap" or "K-Swap" of the next generation. I mean, the LS swap phenomenon has no doubt helped GM in sales of new cars, parts for old cars, and of course, crate engines themselves with the GM Performance branch. This engine will basically print money for them if it succeeds with people, and it's going to be to the enthusiast's benefit too!
@ericlessard6890
@ericlessard6890 10 ай бұрын
i'm old user of Taco's and Tundra's... and with all the problems that the new Tundra have (Rod knock and spun bearing), i really focusing my new purchace on this truck... and yep it's look good.
2023 GMC Canyon | First Impressions and Improvements
11:55
savagegeese
Рет қаралды 124 М.
Survival skills: A great idea with duct tape #survival #lifehacks #camping
00:27
Please be kind🙏
00:34
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 188 МЛН
Homemade Professional Spy Trick To Unlock A Phone 🔍
00:55
Crafty Champions
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
Understanding Engine Break In | Dos and Don'ts
16:02
savagegeese
Рет қаралды 403 М.
PT Cruiser Review | The Best Car Ever Made
22:52
savagegeese
Рет қаралды 338 М.
Is Toyota V35A-FTS Engine Reliable? Well..It's Not That Simple
19:31
Tinkerer's Adventure
Рет қаралды 561 М.
20W-50 vs 5W-20: Which Oil Protects Better?
37:56
The Motor Oil Geek
Рет қаралды 159 М.
4 WORST And 8 BEST Things About The 2023 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2
15:10
Why Five Stroke Engines Are More Efficient But Still a Failure
18:18
driving 4 answers
Рет қаралды 518 М.
Nissan Murano Cross Cabriolet | Owning the Shame
28:29
savagegeese
Рет қаралды 80 М.
Ep. 060 - It's Time to Answer Some Questions
1:53:11
Hornady Manufacturing
Рет қаралды 313 М.
Mustang GT vs Nissan Z | Maximum Muscle, High Prices
28:04
savagegeese
Рет қаралды 329 М.
Kad se neko ispred tebe ubaci i zauzme parking mesto 😀
0:21
AutoRS Test
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Как превратить свой Zeekr в BMW? Китайцы:
0:15
Anton Gora - Gorazh Group Shanghai
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Снова сельский непонятный движ 😁 #Россия вперед🔥
0:12
Светлана Озаровская
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН