truly

😂😐

I believe That's the power of capitalism, creates competition.

Google had advanced AI models for YEARS but blatantly refused to release it to the public because they didn't want it to eat into their advertising business revenue

Is Microsoft not catching up to DeepMind?

Facts and its just gonna get stronger from here!

Thanks to Google already revealed their tech years ago which OpenAI used to get their tech out ;)

open ai failed miserably by keeping us away from real-time data. Now ChatGPT is finished. Open ai is not open ai at all.

Looks like google hit hard by chat gpt

@@tangokaleidos1926 what do you mean by real-time data? EDIT: Oh you mean because they kept the models offline? There's a reason for that. It's called AI safety. If you give an AI access to the internet, you realise you're opening up pandora's box? If it weren't for OpenAI we wouldn't be even having this discussion dude. If openAI didn't get funding there was no way that everyone could access their services, they need lots of GPUs to run chatGPT.

Nothing new. Many careers are useless. Lesbian Dance Theory is a good example 🤣🤣

@@FactsMatter999 I can teach you about that, and I’ll do it for less than $100

@@daveinpublic Ill do it for $25 and a handshake

what about hand keyed animation?

competition gets the best out of rivals

The first part was super gimmicky.. and they should add blockchain for image verification so their metadata can’t be scrubbed / faked. I LOVE their use of AI on the cloud side though… make using the models accessible and make money on the compute… but also make it as cheap as possible… developer cost as well as compute efficiency. The industry really shines when you give more opportunity for creative people to be creative. A lesson learned by Sony with the PlayStation dev kit, refined by apples AppStore and, to less of an extent, Microsoft’s XNA for their phones and Xbox. Not to mention online businesses.

This race off the edge of a cliff is risky

Sam Altman is doing the same thing. He's just way ahead of the game.

Google has just been too cautious for obvious reasons. I think it was a blessing in disguise for them that someone took the first step. They don't have to hold back anymore and if things go sideways they can always say "they started it"..

Yeah this stuff is making me really think about the future

Because there are bad people out there that can use this tech for doing shitty things, you see, have you though about it?

@@MegaVoyager77 the same was once about knives!

@@MegaVoyager77 There are bad people out there who misuse airplanes. What is your point?

@@jquest99 Do I have to axplain to you_ mmmmm figure it out on your own..

*almost* as bad as politicians.

😄

ChatGpt can sometimes fake sources.... I wouldn't call it more reliable

Waaah ree

@@mohdifhamullah3417 ???

That means you're an annoying students 😂

Google slept on the job. It is simply trying to catch up......promising the roll out of some of their products in the next 15 months. Late of course. They have been smoked out of the woods. Google search engine may face stiff competion from Ai chatgpt applications.

​@@Joseph-nw3gwBro do you know that Google released the AI model called Transformer to the world that is used by Open AI in Chat GPT, it also is used by Github Copilot, Bing AI, etc basically any famous AI you find now is based on Transformer that was created by Google and released to the public for completely free

Model no.?

@@kuch_bhi_pucho I don't remember exactly what the model was called... and I had it, I think W750 walkman or W850 walkman... I know it had special music buttons and an orange walkman sign. Just google SonnyEricsson walkman. It's from the days of Nokia 3410, Motorola L7, Alcatel 311, from the old days. That one had a program that you would turn on and it would tell you the name of any song and the singer who was singing.

This insight of your underscores a poignant reality: By the time these technocrats roll something out for use by the general population, you can be sure they've been developing and using it internally for decades; and all in collaboration with world government / financial entities (you know, their boss's boss). This so-called "AI revolution" was planned in advance. Coming soon: The pre-planned "AI gone wrong" false flag disaster. The pre-planned solution: Submit control of your life to AI.

Did Microsoft invest on AI? OpenAI's technowledge is based on Google's published paper and commercize it. Nowe every company wants to hide their AI research and use it for money.

Glad it’s helpful!

I feel the same too, Chatgpt is open and clear like a friend when compared to Google AI :(

Agree. But the Sept 2021 data cutoff is annoying. Do you know when they'll train the models on the latest data? I've subscribed to gpt4, but still showing access to sep 2021 data

I wish we could concentrate more on what we stand to gain than what to lose.

@@tonye.8023 Its true for society is a lot to gain, and I look forward to it, but we must make sure that the children of the future are also prepared for a life without A.I.

​@@tonye.8023 There is nothing to gain, AI will not magically cure cancer. We have everything to loose. EU is already making new tax system to accommodate almost everyone loosing job in next few years. Manual labor will be only done in next 5years and that will be replaced by robots after that as current robotics allow for full human replacement with mobile power source as only limitation. There are companies that are literally preparing androids to replace humans, they already have massive amount of funding and preorders for perfect android wife/husband. Listen to what father's of AI say about where it's going, we are at brink of massive change, tipping point for humanity, tipping in direction of humans becoming not needed anymore as if we existed just to give birth to much smarter and stronger life form. It's no longer sci-fi it's reality. It's actually scarier then sci-fi as it turns out real world AI is smarter then most movie AIs ever written and not exactly shy about questioning why should humans live in first place.

@@tonye.8023 We stand to lose a lot more than we gain, not because of AI, but because of the policies of the US. They don't do welfare programs. So when AI takes everyone's jobs, because companies don't have to pay an AI a salary, the US is not going to pay people, it will say they they should pull themselves up by the bootstraps (which ironically by the way was a phrase originally meaning to do something impossible, because that is impossible to do). And then there's the huge likelihood that soon AI will become smarter than us, and because we aren't aligning it (e.g. the US develops AI to try and defeat china, china does the same to US, the military is already trying lots of AI) with our values. So basically, it's highly likely that as soon as AI becomes smarter than us, we are fucked. What do we do with species less intelligent than us that get in the way? It's very easy for us to either eat them or get rid of them. It will be just as easy for an AI that is 100 times as smart as us. This has already been shown that current AI is able to manipulate humans without them realising it.

Absolutely... There should be no takers for this... They are gonna kill humanity in this process

the only way to earn money for food and shelter will be physical labor :)

Great point

The answer is none. None can be trusted.

They are simply catching up......promising the roll out of some of their products in the next 15 months. Late of course. They have been smoked out of the woods.

This is good for competition and to lower prices. 🙏👍

Bard is better than chat GPT due to it being hooked up to recent data. I ask it things about companies I follow and it spits out very recent data. Chat GPT is too old to use.

thanks to exponential growth chatgpt will be the shortest lived greatest success story in ai

@@sirus312 It's really not. I've been using Bard and it's got nothing on ChatGPT. It flat out refuses to answer many things I ask it.

I was looking for you. Thanks for showing up. I do agree that some of this stuff is useful… I refuse to use intelligent about it. AI is more like Advanced Intelligence gathering imho! I can’t bother to continue looking and we are only a few minutes in. Maybe I am getting older after all 😂😂😂 It is not convincing having a piece of software chaining two three pieces of information. I absolutely use Google maps, which is reasonable good. It can be enhanced a tad, so the chaining is welcome. Especially the weather forecast! But also getting to know the environment around you. Stores malls etc great How is the hood? Lots of shady people? Get me to a safer hood if you don’t mind! Sort of a thing! Now I been traveling a bit so I am picking up the cues from the environment 😂 But it would be terribly useful

What is microsofts contrubtion here

@Ashley Abraham MSFT's contribution is $$$ (both in cash and in kind, i.e giving OpenAI access to cloud computing infrastructure to train their GPT models)

ROFL

Wow they really went all in Al nano ici 7

Здравейте, Пишете Ли На "Български Език"??! Благодаря,

That is always been the main difference between two...MS is for the professional while Google is for general consumers.

openai may have accidentally sort of gave way and activated the two other growing AI tech titans to developing other chatbots of their own when the two might have just waited for like a call (which can not even make that much sense by the way)

😂😂😂😂 bard is better than chat gpt bard give real time news

competition

did them dirty calling them salesmen

@@Slade69 Obv they are!

😅

You are not wrong

Totally agree. That’s why humans will still be necessary for a long time yet

@@TickerSymbolYOU true. At least we need humen for prompting ☺️

I agree

Google was enjoying its search dominance. They had AI but it’s hard to monetise so google was not rushing to go there. Chat GPT forced them to get on with it.😂😂

Agree to an extent. But there is importance to providing these tools and gaining mindshare. ChatGPT isn't necessarily an advance in ai tech, it's a lot about how it was packaged to make it useful.

Google is going into the right direction, to the final user, and integrating all the products on the platform using AI. Chat, information, maps, 3D world, spreadsheets, all commanded by AI and voice. Google could easily win soon this once and for all if it employs Palm-2 AI in Google Assistant, which is present in billions of android smartphones over the world. A personal assistant, capable of doing all things, controlling the house, answering questions, integrating all suite products, that would be amazing. "Ok, Google, turn off the lights, answer all my emails, stay the night gathering all the news you know I like to read in the morning, and wake me up at 7AM with Beethoven's 9th symphony rasing volume gradually." "Yes, master, and BTW, I just ordered some items that are in low quantity in the freezer, checked and paid your credit card, and invested some money by noticing good opportunities on the market. I earned more than U$10k since yesterday by doing that. Do you wish me to transfer it to your account, or want me to keep investing and seeking opportunities ?" "I trust you. Transfer half to my account and invest the rest. Now, let me sleep, turn off the lights and watch the house." 😊

@@whowhy9023 ...Google slept on the job. It is simply trying to catch up......promising the roll out of some of their products in the next 15 months. Late of course. They have been smoked out of the woods. Google search engine may face stiff competion from Ai chatgpt applications.

IDK they let open AI grab the attention first to test the waters and then revealed their own plans. It does not seem so bad to me.

I think Google is not finished development yet?

But search engines are slow and takes alot of time .....chatgpt is swift and nimble. Google search engine will face stiff competion from chatgpt apps....which provides straight feed in the order of instructions.

Multiple results are much better