💀

🤣🤣🤣

At this point it could be

I am writing the paper now!

Damn

Shame we have yet to see a fictional dinosaur film with scientifically accurate (or at least as accurate as modern science can confirm) that I know of, mind you Jurassic Park/World overshadows whatever else might be out there with their (clumsily retconned to explain the science behind their unrealistic looks) amphibian hybrids

@@1D991 That's because the first jurassic park was made at a time when not much was known about how they actually looked but it was believed that Spielberg's depiction was as scientifically accurate as possible.

@@fyfyi6053 jurrasic park did get people to start thinking the t rex didn’t stand like a kangaroo, so that’s good at least

It's de end ohv da wurrrllld....

@@redspiderlilys6 jurassic park may have been inaccurate but I don't doubt that some of the most brilliant paleontologists of the next generation will be inspired by that franchise. I watched a commented screening of JP at a dinosaur museum and one of the scientists brought attention to the fact that the opening of the movie has multiple shots focused on snakes and other slow moving reptiles, and the ending includes shots of birds, and how that connects to a major shift in how dinosaurs were perceived in the 80s and 90s, as the scientific community came to understand that rather than being clumsy, scaly, and resembling modern reptiles, dinosaurs had feathers and their movements were much more birdlike characteristics. Really interesting stuff

or modern reptile that for some reason called dinosaur

😱

That caiman actually crushed the monitor lizards skull too despite being smaller in that other lizard vs croc fight

The crazy thing is the Tegu actually died, it got its skull crushed by the Gator and the injuries were too big for it to live, so it sadly died 😢

Yeah poor little guy gator was like almost double it's weight lol

Tegus are like the beagles of the dog world. They might be able to do something to a human but they’re chow to a rabid cane corso that is an alligator. Plus tegus are generally pretty friendly as well

“I liked em.” -👴🏼

@@curious1053 ah yes, white people hate animals

Some people actually enjoy seeing reptiles be killed. My dad actively hunts down snakes with a shovel for no reason other than “I don’t like them.”

​@@Shaun_Jones Your dad is an asshole!

I love tarantulas to death, but if one were to fight an iguana, the tarantula would become food very fast.

What an absolute sigma chad

Iguanas are herbivores. But they can kill a tarantula easily anyway.

Really? From what I heard Harryhausen included the Iguana at the beginning to convince the audience that what they were seeing was real. And that later on he regretted doing that. Though I would not be surprised in the slightest if he included it as a jab at the original/the whole slurpusarus trend, considering that overtook stop motion due to how cheap it was in comparison

@@kraikein Harryhausen was very protective of his craft and dismissed other techniques including suitmation and models sadly enough because it made him sound quite arrogant considering the level of craft and talent that went into that.

wha. ,

Not counting if present few abuse, when the creator put the prosthetic sail and horns

Most people would've thought that at the time-if any of them were willing to believe it. The "giant lizards" polemic was strong even among Paleontologists in the era-look at Museum of Natural History for instance.

Don't go down the fake animal rescue rabbit hole then. Most "animal rescue" videos on KZfaq are simply animal abuse for profit. Every time you click on those "heart warming, emotionally satisfying, faith in humanity restored" videos, you're further incentivizing their cruelty

Oddly that portrayal predicted how today spinosaurus reconstruction looks like.

@@prasetyodwikuncorojati2434 Less crocodilian tho

Basically just secondontosaurus

Spinosaurus in 2030

It's true. When we go to see a dino movie, whatever he is, at the moment the dinos in question, even if not completely accurate, look overall in good part to their physical form (ex: a raptor still a raptor even wihout feathers) we know and have a good idea about how this latter is, it's sufficient to us. We know all how a Stegosaurus, Triceratops, T-rex or raptor look like in the big lines. Everybody on Earth. And even if they aren't completely accurate, at the moment they all look justly in these big lines, it's sufficient for us. They are dinosaurs for us, and we will not complain at all. However, if we go to a movie who said he have dinosaurs and we only have giants reptiles we will everybody reconizes as just giants lizards or crocodiles just filmed bigger and with adds on them, we will complain because they aren't dinosaurs because they just don't like as dinosaurs visually. Instead, it's preferable to show them as "prehistoric reptiles that live alongside dinosaurs". That will be a good compromise without taking the public as stupid and uneducated folk. The dinosaurs have become so popular at the begginning of the XXs, especially right after "The lost World" 1925 with his Stop-Motion dinos that everybody on earth, even the most stupid and low intelligence people were all fully aware how each dino specie look like in the big lines and from a far distances. This is why is exact to call this part of the subject to said that was quite insulting to the people to show these animals as dinos. Because, in short, from the realisators toward the public, what they have in mind was : "it's okay, at the moment they are giant reptiles, people will accept them whatever how they are". Showing that they realling think that the entirity of the public was stupid to accept everything and were mindless.

Yeah, there’s a word for that. “Personable” I think. People don’t wanna save sharks because they hate them, they’re “scary” and “dangerous” but people wanna save polar bears or koalas because they’re “cute” and “fluffy” . They are personable.

waaaah not the poor lizaaaaaards :___(________ go feed yourself to one

@@vulturedrawz Yeah, you're right. Still doesn't mean we shouldn't be biased towards animals we don't consider them cute. But hey, what do I know.

@@vulturedrawz Exactly, if you asked someone if a otter or a shark can be considered "evil" they'd say the shark, despite the fact that male otters often display outright psychotic Behavior such as holding baby otters ransom for food and assaulting baby seals for fun, whereas sharks really only attack things they think is food, you'll really never see a shark holding babies ransom or attacking something for fun, appearance and media portrayals are very big factors in how people think about animals. (Ps I don't hate otters or anything I'm just using them for my statement)

"He's dead, Jim!" -Dr. Bones McCoy.

The one that always gets me is the often showing up in the original flash gordon serial's 'dragons.' Which is an odd one because most people seem to think the two living iguanas are killed, but the clear dead iguanas seem to be different iguanas, they have different patterns and seem to be taxidermied and stuffed. Which would be a lot of expense (and time) when taxidermied iguanas would be easier and cheaper and could be rented for a scene. And since hte iguana 'fight' is just. Iguanas doing Iguana things and hanging out until they're obviously swapped with dead iguanas... it seemed unlikely.

Oh the Klingon pet, I remember that, so cute.

That dog was so cute!

and Muffit II of Battlestar

I thought they found evidence that humans hunted smiled on? Or do you mean just specifically the Neanderthals and not homosapiens?

Too be far that's a whole subject for another day lol.

@@craig2196 definitely. And probably more extensive due to there being more incidences

@@jonbeech5158 most modern captive lions aren't given the appropriate amount of space, and it must've been especially bad considering it was over 40 years ago.

The Banthas in Star Wars: A New Hope were also costumed elephants.

There's a troll in the comments below I think who is trying to claim that forcing animals to fight for entertainment as a documentary on human behavior. Like how stupid is that? He's also trying to like in the animal abuse to watching a documentary of you know, real animals doing what they actually naturally do.

İm am an animal lover too İf u couldnt tell by my profile picture

I mean, it is nostalgic but very sad

Something being nostalgic and something being okay aren't the same thing. It is like Principle Skinner said when trying on his old POW helmet "Oh this takes me back"

@@horsetuna ​ There is some early wildlife footage of a tiger killing a crocodile got used in a lot of jungle adventure movies around this era too. Yeah, it is different.

Sorta happened in Terra Nova where a moniter lizard like creature echoed the tacky lizard costumes, fines, spines and all.

or use live animals but cgi the different stuff onto them. (without abusing them ofc.)

Campy revival of 1850's dinosaurs engaged in a constant violent battle for no reason would be very funny

@@reinatakagawa those old goofy dinos would have been great in Primal

@@Abyssaracnis Would be cool if they redid terra nova. Now that tv shows can have bigger budgets.

Considering there are people already selling books with "illustrations" made by AI, this is a genuinely concerning issue.

What do you think about the trailer for 65, the new dinosaur movie?

@@ExtremeMadnessX He's promising a lot ! Sure, the dinosaurs aren't accurate and are in a Jurassic Park look visually and the only species we get to see will be again the populars Trex and Velociraptor, but overall, in term of sequences, with the atmosphere and ralisation of the scenes themselves building tensions, scaring and actions, it's stand out pretty well ! Will be just a normal dino movie to pass a good time before it, but it's already sufficient. Here, it's not about the dinos themselves we will have expectations but about the realisations and how they mange to made true scary moments with them, on that there all the expectations to be r=really well done. And I hope so on that.

@@dudotolivier6363 I really hope they can somehow give them better designs.

@@kade-qt1zu The dinosaurs depiction and the accuracy of their designs isn't he main goal of this movie. "65" by Sam Raimi and the people behind "A Quiet Place" movie is a science-fiction thriller-action movie. It's on his tension, scary level and actions sequences on which he must succeed. Plus, for the movie's defense by advance, the setting will be in a alien planet, so where the evolution was different. So, if the dinos don't look accurate at all, like they were, will be normal and made sens in the same time. Will more be like a modern version of "Planet of the Dinosaurs" from 1977 than anything else.

True. In some of the early descriptions of the movie, it was still labeled as a dinosaur so that might say something.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing- I remember originally learning it was a Brontosaurus as a kid…

Buy was the Nessie ever depicted as being no different than an iguana, minus the gigantism?

@@pepperedash4424 As far as I’m aware, there was no unified, universal “look” for the monster before the “plesiosaur” version caught on, so giant lizard probably made as much sense as anything else. The monster didn’t really catch on in popularity until 1933, so I’d imagine common conceptions of it hadn’t really started to crystalize in 1934. If I had to make a completely unfounded guess, a lot of people in 1933 and 1934 may have been talking about the “dinosaur in Loch Ness,” and to some people in the 30s, perhaps including the filmmaker behind this depiction, “dinosaur” may have simply meant “giant lizard.”

@@diebesgrab The general consensus on the appearance dinosaurs during the 30s derived from paintings by Charles R. Knight. Though his Dinosaur were reptilian in appearance, they weren't full blown lizards.

Mysterious Island is a great classic film.

I thought it was _Revenge of the Creature._ He was a comic relief lab assistant.

@@julietfischer5056 Tarantula was first. Revenge of the Creature was the first one where you could really see Eastwood. In Tarantula his face was mostly obscured by a flight helmet and mask. His role in Revenge of the Creature was also more substantial. His lines in Tarantula were pretty perfunctory, whereas he was given a modicum of characterization in Revenge of the Creature.

Yes, but now you can see all sorts of animal abuse on social media, inclyding KZfaq. par example... the videos about turtles with colourful barnacle, and then jewlry etc., glue all over their shells. This kills the turtle slowly as the shell is part of the living integument of the the animal. Then these arses remove what they glued to the poor benighted creature claiming they found them like that, or worse...they sell them as living(but not well and not for long) decorations. Then there's the whole "rescues kitten/puppy from situations the "rescuers' put the animals in, in the first place. People can be pretty vile just to get a like on socmed. :(

If it's just an iguana crawling around it's not hardly abuse. It is however painfully stupid. Humans are animals too, so I guess in a way it is animal abuse.

Filming a lizard walking around is not abuse...

Filming them just walking is not really abuse, but gluing a fin on a caimans back and having it fight a Tegu lizard ( wonder if the caiman killed it) can sure be considered cruelty.

(I edited this post slightly because the creator showed footage of the Rex suit from The Land Unknown in the opening montage, but the movie actually features slurpasaurs more than the Rex. King Dinosaur is all slurpasaur)

I think Ray Harryhausen was the best at stop-motion photography. There are a few documentaries about him, if you haven't already. :)

Sounds interesting. I'll have to look into it.

Civilization II: Fantastic Worlds. I've played that. The Age of Reptiles mode was hard, because it was military victory only with no nukes.

That sounds rad. I need to search for a play-thru or overview essay on that game. I've never played EVO but I just find game history wildly interesting. I think there's a war series where people work with dinos too? I'm a new sub, very cool if the channel does games too!

@@picahudsoniaunflocked5426 War series with dinosaurs? You might be thinking of Dino Riders. You can watch that here: kzfaq.info/sun/PLLhOnau-tupRpHH98erzMh3jrSCubyn2m Unfortunately, there is no good game based on it.

Did the tegu even survive that beating?

@@Skyypixelgamer I don't think so--later in the video, we see a shot that looked like the fight was basically over. I'm glad that standards of animal treatment in movies are completely different now.

@@zoyadulzura7490 yeah thank god for that

@@Skyypixelgamer no, it didn’t

Thanks for the information. For a long time I always assume if godzilla was some sort of sea dragon, because of the iconic laser breath and the fact if it never referenced by characters as dinosaur in many of the incarnation so it must be something entirely different

In the Heisei films he's also just straight up a dinosaur. In Godzilla vs King Ghidorah we even see him pre-mutation!

@@gojiratheking1065 Well,different incarnations of Godzilla has different origins,while Heisei Godzilla was indeed a mutated dinosaur,other Godzillas have different origins.

Ironic that Heisei Godzilla is the only incarnation to be a Dinosaur, at the same time being the one with the most mammalian physical traits.

Alot of godzilla incarnations have different origins. 54 is a prehistoric kaiju awakened by nuclear bombs 55 is a prehistoric kaiju sealed away in a island fighting a different prehistoric kaiju hanna barbera... they don't explain i think heisei was a godzillasaurus that got mutated by atomic bombs 1998 was a mutated iguana millenium.. i forgor 💀 mv godzilla is a prehistoric titan 2016 is a evolving tadpole that got too close to radiation earth... i forgor agai 💀

oh yeah, i think i remember that, its coming back to me now

That's hilarious.

The dogs honestly looked more funny then scary in the clips shown

@@pocketmarcy6990 I saw it in Black and White and it worked a bit better

I have lizards and it was hard to watch , I bet this video is gonna get flagged 😢

Yeah

Agreed

It seems like in the past, people didn’t have any empathy for animals.

I absolutely agree!!!🙏🤔

These type of "slurpasaur" are acceptable since the animal are just scenery, have just outfits adding on them and just at maximum walk in front of the screen. Nothing more. A good majority of the movies and productions in this video show that in many extents.

Yes, I completely agree.

Ah yes the one that attacks the submarines and battleship before the final battle! Warriah (i think i’m spelling it right) was my favorite monster from the book actually! Felt the most intimidating to me. Atomic rex has a few monsters that could be likened to slurpasaurs in it as well. I’m content with the asthetic referenced in the forms of original creatures while being portrayed by non live animals. The practice was unconvincing and immoral, but there’s just a way that it catches ones eye that makes me guiltily intrigued so it seems at least a modest source of inspiration.

That's an interesting way of looking at it. Essentially continuing the trend, but in the form of literature. Definitely the more responsible way of doing it at least.

@@DinoDiego16 your new this video comes out at a convenient time because I was actually going to write about this phenomenon in a Sci-Fi series I'm working on. How might I get official permission to mention you in a complimentary way in the writing?

I kinda like the looks of giant lizards as “dinosaurs”. Though obviously, it would be far easier to achieve this in an ethical manner, in the modern day. And obviously any animal fights would either be CGI, or done with puppetry.

@@AJSSPACEPLACE Correct! As an artistic expression, I love it

“I miss the good ol’ days of cinema.” -👴🏼

It's possible he might do this in the future, although this film was specifically about dinosaurs and just happened to note that other animals were used as well in passing such as elephants for mammoths

@@horsetuna there was a section in the video were he talked about movies that used simular ideas i am just suprised he did not mention the terrifying pet store rat in that section

@@WhatDillionYT you're right Fair enough.

Oh, even better! The Nezura production didn't use tame, trained pet store rats, it used honest to goodness sewer rats. Untrained, wild, disease-carrying sewer rats. This obviously did not work.

@@cqmorrell well they first used tame rats but then they used sewer rats which were destroying the set... but not in the way they wanted....

Who cares it’s funny stop wasting my air wit pushy shi

@Shinichi animal abuse is not funny. You really can't read a room, can you? What a stupid comment. Hopefully, you will grow up soon, jabron.

@@shinichi6235 bro thinks abusing animals is funny

Lol,who cares slurpasaurs are the best

@@aeerjgyehgyuierhjgukjlr everyone dumass

That would be hard to do today for a very simple reason: Copyright.

@@Werezilla that and people would quickly notice it due the internet

Austin Powers made that in sort of type of joke in the second movie, they literally used the clip of Independence Day with the aliens blowing up the White House with Doctor Evil even saying it was from Independence Day.

There's an infamous sci-fi movie that is best known by its nickname "Turkish Star Wars", because it contains recycled footage from Star Wars.

Occasionally you can find a low budget direct to "video" film that will recycle old film footage. I know the movie badass recycled a bus wreck scene from another movie

Isn't that the guy who jokingly was blamed for all of the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park escaping, because he had been credited with being the dinosaur supervisor?

As a kid watching this I was also hella confused how nobody other than me was ever appalled by the obvious animal abuse. I think it really goes down to the general public just having less sympathy for reptiles.

@@manospondylus4896 ppl only show sympathy to cute mammals

@@toniotrussardi8126 People typically only show empathy to animals if it doesn't require effort or the animal is a dog, rats for example are proven to show empathy to other rats such as bringing food to injured rats but people still default to killing one's they find in the house rather than using more humane methods.

@@orangeninjapocket603 there are entire books about how if you really want to make someone appear evil in a movie, you have to have them hurt a cat or a dog. One of the books about the phenomenon how to write good movies is called, save the cat

XD I'm glad you liked the video

I'm going to make fun of his incorrect use of the phrase "that of" and his mispronunciation of "coati." 🙂

Thats even worse As dimetrodon was an ancestor to mammals and wasn't a reptile

@@gergopiroska5749 At least they weren't called dinosaurs, and Dimetrodon does look very similar to some modern lizards, even though they are more related to mammals than they are to reptiles.

@@jacobcox4565 tbh i don't hate old movies as they have their charm But calling an iguana with glued on horns a tyrannosaur is fucking terrible Whats even worse is that they already knew the basic look of dinosaurs

@@gergopiroska5749 It's just insulting the audience's intelligence

@@jacobcox4565 exactly

Probably the same stock sound effect.

If that how it goes then I’m not dieing 😭😂

Honestly, animals don't have rights. Rights are a creation of human beings, and humans only enjoy them if they're willing to fight for them. Whatever 'rights' animals are perceived to have are simply what mercy we are willing to extend them.

It’s funny because all those films suck compared to new films of today that don’t have any animals getting hurt.

@@thisguysgaming7246 Well, that was the past...

@colbyprice-lampkin7547 nobody ever said that they weren't terrible people but if you don't know better you can't do better. Animal rights just weren't a consideration so it was accepted at the time and as awful as it was at least society has learned from it

@@aebhosor4835 exactly everything from the past is a weaker and less evolved version of todays world.

More like an homage

Perhaps in a matter of coincidence, but just before this came out I had a plot idea involving this phenomenon for my sci-fi comedy series using these old movies I wonder if I can get away with actually mentioning Dino Diego in the writing as one of the vigorously researched footage used

Lol who cares slurpasaurs are the best!

@@TerriazeCAPCUTeditor What do you mean by "who cares"?

@@TerriazeCAPCUTeditor abuse is never cool

I’m assuming you’re his agent then?

@@GreaterGrievobeast55 sort of , I usually work as his literary agent, helping him secure his book deals , he’s a renaissance lizard, truly

You should see the one they use today for the Drachenstich festival. It's the world's largest walking robot.

Awesome! I'll have to watch it.

Tegus aren't monitor lizards, but they did converge on the same lifestyle as them. Their closest relatives are more obscure, like worm lizards and racerunners

@@nmheath03 thanks for the information my guy

Most animals are terrifying when they're scaled up to a certain size.

@@RokuroCarisu sure, but I think shrews would be especially ferocious.

Could you imagine if this actually happened Director "Why do our trained Chimps keep dying after one day of production?" Animal Handler: "I don't know, they only got bit by the Komodo Dragon a couple of times."

But, those were puppets and stop-motion

Or if it’s me making it, some other practical effects. I really want to see what a modern Slurpasaur movie would look like, so (probably not right now because of the weekly videos) I’m gonna do that at some point.

No modern animal looks like a dinosaurs Not even modern dinosaurs (birds) look like their ancient cousins