2zzge

2008 Ford GT V8

BMW M57

Idm to me. Just something GM related 😅

4g63t if not already done

That's really cool

VW had a 1.4 TSI that was also twincharged in mass production, for example in their best selling model Golf.

@@6rimR3ap3r Had a Scirocco with this engine. Remmaped it to 210hp. A gem to drive, low end torque from 1100rpm and you feel the turbo kicking at 3600rpm... Incredible technology

not mentioning the volvo engine was the only miss on this video

What Volvo has that from factory? Thanks

They had helmets and seatbelts, modern for the era

Agreed, no way you could get a racecar down to 890KG and not compromise safety components, some teams were running aluminum roll cages which is just ridiculous.

True, even the 30 that survived their lives will be altered forever.

​@@337speed The Cardboard Rollcages of the Lancia 037 is not to be forgotten... lightness at the cost of safety

Man stuff right there buddy, no time for safety in 90s ... as for the spectators oh well, learn not to stand in the wrong place for a pic/thrills. Now they try rally away from ppl(closed circuit is meh)... like the army(drivers) they know what they signed up for 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽🍻🤙🏽🇦🇺

Dirt rally 2.0 really gets you on edge pulling the weirdest faces making the strangest noises, as you narrowly avoid stacking a delta s4 into a line of rocks 😂

Fr, driving some of these cars in the sims, whether in dirt or AC or otherwise, makes you wonder how it was possible to drive these cars in real life. Ludicrous power

@@nenthal1761 Yup, I put hundreds of hours into the Dirt Rally's and RBR and still feel intimidated by these cars.

@@amr1t_ Driving Quattro S1 E2 i felt more annoyed than anything else.Bloody thing just refuses to turn.

@@hillclimbracingfan5821 makes you wonder how the drivers were making it work back then. Feels like I understeer at 1000 mph in a left 4

well.. i rather go with rpm tbh. its just more fun

then you’ve never driven a boosted car

@@snucc1000 enough of them but i just dont like them. they are boring esp oem once.

Displacement is presumably the total amount of air / air fuel volume that fits the combustion chambers at atmospheric pressure, not just the fixed physical volume the stroke and bore all cylinders take up. Forced induction always artificially increases displacement because you're forcing more air / air fuel via compression into the combustion chambers than the engine can ordinarily provide to itself without forced induction, thereby increasing displacement. Increasing RPM also "effectively" increases displacement; As RPM increases, so do the amount of combustion events per second. An engine at 10k rpm "effectively" displaces more air fuel than the same engine does at 6k rpm at any given time. There is no replacement for displacement because almost all developments in car engines to give them more power artificially increase displacement in some way, shape, or form.

how is it one of the best lines ever when its wrong, any engine can be boosted, and at the end of the day the bigger engine will win

Thank you very much!

i'm seeing like 3 or 4 racing puns and i don't know if any of them are intentional

Absolutely, these guys produce some of the best documentaries. Imagine if these guys produced your history lessons in high school. Everyone would have enjoyed classes a lot more.

So it's kind of like a hybrid centrifugal supercharger/turbocharger? That's really cool. Does it decouple automatically, or is there a separate control to do it when you go through the throttle range?

He is talking about an emd. They drive the turbos from a one way bearing. Once you get enough boost pressure, the turbo overruns the bearing

The german fighter jets also had nitrous for a burst of speed in aerial combat.

@dr.hugog.hackenbush9443 FW190 to allow a Higher service ceiling, i.e. the B17s.👍

RR Merlin.

I wanted to point this out as well

at 72PSI I figure a head gasket would have been an exercise in futility.

Or an Offenhauser...

Yeah I love that build! I have 1 out of 3 complete twincharge vehicles

@@claudedottin1312 Especially when the dude said that the owner just had it built so he could say he owns it and leaves it with him LMFAO. I've built dozens of customer cars, mostly Wankel powered as that's what I built with my late father, and not a single one said "build me the sweetest car you can & when you're done just keep it & enjoy it." Damn near a dream scenario right there lol. Like he said in the video tho twin charging really isn't necessary anymore with the advancements it not only turbocharger technology but also metallurgy & engine management. Twin scroll housings, Inconel & billet turbines, integrated BOV's, ECU controlled anti-lag, Co2 controlled wastegates and the list goes on & on & on.

@@jdmmike7225 true true but the way I building and reasoning (other than needing out) is what kind of drivability can I achieve that fits my taste while keeping a certain budget etc. only one of mine will have a by pass similar to a scrorocco engine . One of mine will be on my FC to experiment with compound boost and choke points of motor.

Don't forget twin spark plugs.

Thanks Fiat....I wish there was a better alternative for their financial problems in the 70-80s....

Lancia was Fiat's mad cousin and experimental division where they tried new ideas before eventually fit it in a Fiat. Mildest of these experiments was the SOHC 1116cc engine that ended up in the Fiat 128 built from 1969 and after that built in many sizes and fitted to more Fiat models than most can name.

If Ford had bought Lancia, that would have been the end of Lancia, same with Alfa Romeo.

Dude I think the ECV2 would’ve been the greatest car ever made if they hadn’t cancelled it because they reversed the turbos, manifolds, and upgraded the cooling on the triflux to make it more drivable and on top of the amazing engine was a smaller, lighter, and more aerodynamic body with better weight distribution that still looks modern to this day, the car was about 30 years ahead of it’s time.

Love my twincharged 4ag aw11 mr2.

LUV is a Chevy/Isuzu truck back in early 70's thru the early 80's. So Light Utility Vehicle Uniform Romeo videos. Makes no sense at all.

agreed. great idea. I've never seen builds as solid and clean as Boosted Motorsports. I mean, its so much more than just an engine swap with these guys! It's the interior, the body, suspension, everything!!

Their inability to significantly expand outside of their European heartland was a major problem. Just look at VW GTI sales in North America for basically decades at this point for how much they love their hot hatches over there and yet Lancia was just never able to expand into that and countless other lucrative markets. 🤷

Yeah I was hoping someone would mention this!

that's one of the worst vw engine, right after the older one from mk4, 1.4 16V nonturbo

Hellion has a twin turbo system for the supercharged Mustangs and Hellcat platforms. With modern turbo tech, lag is virtually gone, and the only reason to twincharge is just for clout. Stacking power adders is really inefficient but great for shock factor

@@hoost3056 so far, hellion twin turbo kit is the actual feasible plan. I haven’t decided on which set up I want between the stealth or flashy one. Stealth would be a sick surprise but flashy would be awesome to show off. Either way tho, I’m keeping the stock cats to pass inspections

@@EAJ97 dang, my state doesn’t do inspections or emissions testing

It’s been a while, I’m back on schedule tho🙏🏽

It literally means Over-Fed

Yes. Been needed to do that one

Boost doesn't lower lifespan, if that were the case turbo diesels wouldnt be getting millions of miles. It is all about heat management and proper maintenance. Too many people put boost on their cars and push out too much power without proper supporting mods and tunes leading to early failures.

@@tehtehkhantengames8580 I didn’t say there weren’t great stock boosted vehicles either. It’s true if done properly, it won’t make a big difference, but in the long run, it’s just another potential problem for the future

@@EAJ97 And I am trying to say it isnt... power is a potential problem. Heat is a potential problem. Compression is a potential problem. In fact if you set it up correctly a turbo can get you more power, with less emissions and less stress on the motor. It is when it's used to make up for power or displacement that it becomes detrimental to engine life. Your entire premise is wrong in the first comment is all I'm saying.

@@tehtehkhantengames8580 At what cost??? Mass & COST Still cannot replace displacement. A larger displacement engine will make more reliable power more easily and more cost effective - and with better long term durability. That said, there is room for all.

@@tehtehkhantengames8580 Turbo diesels huh, maybe because... I dunno, they have to be extremely overbuilt just to handle their method of combustion? Maybe steel wet sleeves, ginormous con rods and bearings with 15 head bolts per cylinder might make an engine pretty durable regardless of what stress you put it under. That and turbo diesels may even be more overbuilt to handle the increased power and heat. There is no argument to be had here, your statement is completely pointless. OBVIOUSLY the engine whether designed for boost or not will wear out faster when you put it under more stress. This applies to revving it higher, higher compression, cam, whatever. Larger displacement engines BY DEFAULT have bigger bearings and rods, they by default have more to "wear" away; OBVIOUSLY they will last longer than a smaller displacement engine producing the same power by whatever method. You take that same turbo diesel and take the turbo off it, it will almost certainly take longer to wear out. This is the most pointless argument that could possibly be had but its youtube so I guess I can't expect much.