neil to himself: "nope i'm not"

@@aaronrajadurai1167 “damnit how’d he know “

LMAOOAOAOA he knows him fr

They're both asshats. And idiots. Listen to their nonsense...somebody ask them how the astroNOTS got thru the van Allen radiation belts. Aka the firmament. Hint hint hint. They didnt

lmfaaaooo

Idk,not judging anyone, but i don't like people(Neil degrasse) screaming or being aggressive to prove or implement their point. And another thing, he doesn't even listen and think about what other people are saying he just have a preconceived answer to everything,which he just don't want to question.

Pratham Bansal he was right though. NASA started and was funded solely because the U.S. wanted to step up to the Soviet Union and prove that capitalism is better than communism. He was angry that they were naive about that FACT. If you watch carefully, you’d see Lawrence agreeing with him too.

@@prathambansal8951 he is not wrong tho

so many snow flakes here. Neil is king.

The godfather of memes

@@emperorthylord literally haha

17:27

As if art is just funny and entertainment. Dawkins is a clown

That's because you are British 😂

Mars is a wondering star. And no body can leave earth .. No one has ever gone thru the impenetrable firmament.. More lies

Not funny@@dannystefanovski5513

He loves himself too

I just read this as he was saying it!!!

AliceDiableaux Because ya gotta learn math, which is even harder

worth has zero to do with effort-- the value one gets out of an effort has nothing to do with it "worth". I get a great buzz out of an old TV show-- the only "hard" part is finding the remote so I can turn on the TV.or walking my mutt. and he gets value out of a cheap and easy approach to a simple bush of little value, I assure you.

@@SangeevSelvaratnam me too lol! i was like wow that was a big coincidence

I don't think he's very social. That's why he only says cliches. " science is hard but it ..."

Not everyone but Richard is

@@kamranbegakafr3ak it comes across like that but he just doesn't give a shit what people think of him, just says it like it is

yeah but he is boring i enjoy watching other but he is the most boring

Kamran Beg yeah just like you.

@@tengentopka727 hah I myself think I'm boring thanks for confirming

Awesome

Can't pronounce your name but crossing the boundaries I can extend my love respect to you young mind. Let your journey continue with the amusement astonishment and continuous association with wonder.

@AMB my emotional concurrence with you. Let me share my part of overwhelming joy even a person been confined with basic arithmetic geometry and excel or Autocad types of software professionally for my bread & butter but I do communicate others with the jewels of science and scientific temper. Try to enjoy the reading or anykind of association with the know how.

this comment made my day

👏👏👏

thanks brooo

30:54 watch me

Grumpy cat vibes 😂

Oh man.. Spot on, hahahha

Dawkins is magic in his way and the way the dont accept God

@@michaelwallden7261 😂😂😂😂😂

😂

Right, I kind of want to see a comic book based around Neil Tyson, with that as his catchphrase.

Yes, because he has made an effort to learn all the facts and has the conviction and courage to make them known

Brilliant Neil was on fire.

Don't believe me just watch 😎

prove it's a fact! Otherwise, explain why it's not.

They were nemesis in tbbt. They r the energy😂

Both extremely narcissistic

Nye is an actor. Lol he is full of more shit than passion. Tyson on the other hand is great .

Guy in white shirt is shitty comedian. Just made the show horrible

@@Jay-ln7ov You know who are narcissists? Stupid people. Tyson and Nye are not stupid people.

Hypernova Collapsar ...dude YOU ROCK!!

I’m 34 and just decided to look into it as well... it’s never too late!

Thanks for writing that. I'm just starting an engineering degree at 35.

Hypernova I just got accepted into North Carolina State University where I’m also getting a degree in physics! “Science is hard but it’s worth it.” - Richard Dawkins

@@tjug0f3m yes but is very hard for someone whose maths are weak or am i wrong?

lol

😂😂😂

Hahaha Very True. People find Neil's interruptions very annoying, but on the contrary, I believe that is what brought the humour and entertainment in this event. It just makes people experiencing this the first time, realise how FUN and VAST science is and you can be a part of it and contribute to the community. For Science!

Because he talks a lot of shit, yeah he makes sense (sometimes) but he only talks in laymen and my god he’s up there with the greatest minds and he’s still talking in idiot language, he’s talking to the crowd not the qualified scientist.

Agreed

He really loves himself too

Neil agrees

He is a bafooooon

He showed his true colour at 13:25... He is not interested in a conversation if he is not the authority. He is very smart but also a narcissist.

​@@22RedEyeJedi22 humm i have seen that part and i dont se any think as narcissim, i think that you should more learn about what you say(narcissim) and more understand the relation and dynamics among those people before judging them. "Most people judge men by their looks, a few judge them by their reality, and very few judge them by truth." - Seneca

Lol 🤣

“The bombastic nature of these mammals to loudly propound their knowledge in a public gathering is a sort of human equivalent of the brilliant plumage of the male peacock.”

good point

The host was annoying and trying way too hard to be funny and each time it was at someone else's expense, primarily Dr. Tysons.

Pretty sure Neil and Stephen are good friends in real life, which is why they don't mind acting that way towards each other.

joshy2 boss+ They are friends. Not to mention Tyson has a tendency to dominate discussions and it is hard for others have their say.

@@joshy2boss931 All these scientists you see are friends. They dig at each other all the time. I can understand how that could be taken the wrong way.

+Dylan F (DJBluff22) And we would love every single microsecond of it.

+abschussrampe just reading all these positive comments make me soooooo happy...I'm an ex Muslim atheist...

+abschussrampe every single femtosecond

+khairowensullivan but if you love Sience you don't need to be atheist

+Bilind samank But it helps. ;)

What do you mean "true"?

@@primeminister1040 in accordance with fact or reality. Accurate or exact.

@@EnlightenedEyes11 what is fact and what is reality? Must the fact be observable? Is reality only what we can see?

@@primeminister1040 the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.

He should revisit that statement and use it against himself...

Nice comment !!

Very deep👍👍👍

Legendary quote man

Benefit thief

And then Tyson started shouting and you went straight back into a state of paralysis?

😂😂😂

+melancholiac - I agree Neil and Nye would make a great team, teaching and entertaining at the same time!

Laurel and hardy

A comedy fraud act!!!!😂

More pseudo-babble bullshit from Neil degasbag with Bill Nye the non-science guy added in!!! Shill's for the system of lies ruling the world!!!

wow, a mechanical engineer with Boeing is not a science guy? cool. I guess everybody who builds and designs the actual applications of scientific discovery is a non-science person.

lol

Thats why bill nye is so awesome. Hes not only very well-educated and smart but hes also socially intelligent. He just spits out creative quick-witted jokes when everyone else is thinking logically and seriously about something. I laughed so hard when tyson compared learning algebra to learning a language like chinese "If you want to study chinese it looks completely intractable" and bill nye just throws in "it looks like greek". Great sense of humor.

I had just passed that part of the video and had to go back to catch the joke. xD Bill Nye is great @Free Dom

Even old uptight Dawkins can't resist a chuckle or two in this setting/

it was a surprising GREAT imitation

Not for long.😅🤣

That's right and it goes for him as well. That he is called Captain Logic by his sycophants is funny. Here's why: he said his Oxbridge college has more Nobel Peace Prizes than 'muslims'; but he failed to realize 'muslims' have infinitely more Nobel Peace Prizes than Richard Dawkins. Enjoy that one sycophant. Oh and there's just as many psychotic Muslims as psychotic Westerners, Richard Dawkins does have a mental health issue from his 'public' school upbringing, chances of him dealing with that are minuscule.

Faesen "Oh and there's just as many psychotic Muslims as psychotic Westerners" Yup we're taking our shoes off at the airport right now because of the Westboro Baptists.

Faesen It is obvious that you are trying to participate in this stupid internet phenomena known as "trolling". It is either that or you are breaking records for stupidity.

John McKay So you don't even have basic mathematics, science and logic: well for free zero equals nothing and 1 equals absolute certainty. Absolutely anything is an infinite compared to zero. It's why the Big Bang happened, maybe you can try and rap your mind around from one particle came the entire universe. Zero is awful, having no Nobel prizes and having the nerve to lambast others, oh and to bring his college into disrepute as well. Dawkins reminds me of a gobby kid who'll go and get his brothers if his bullying doesn't work and someone splats him. Of course all around the world there there are those who are as cowardly as he is, and in fact much worse. I graduated from a top 10 UK university, the last thing I'd do is leech off others achievements, though I know people like yourself that's how you operate.

And you're in the military? Well I guess you send a wacko to kill a wacko.

Dominic London. Wrong.

@@greatbritain5355 3 year later and that's what you choose to comment, not even explain why. You sure live up to your name lol.

That was the most hilarious moment of this debate. I love Neil for that

@@greatbritain5355 Dumbass

@@greatbritain5355 You wrong *Aight i won the debate*

intelligent people tend to be goofy and funny..some are so funny that its hard to work with em..like literally..but its fun tho..

They tried to distract Bro .

Ya I saw that part too

smoke weed everyday

Note: "their" and "there" are very different words. How I wish you could learn the difference 😉

@@gerrytushh You must have a pathetic life to be bothered by such things

@@colby9945 am not pathetic at all. As a teacher, I get paid for precisely pointing out that kind of thing 🤣 Very important 😂

@@gerrytushh Lol got ‘em.

@@acemxe8472 😂some basic grammar never hurt anyone 😂

Right?! I think so too!!

There is a part 1 to this, this is part 2, I agree though that this part could have gone on for hours and hours

Where is part 3689??

That's not what she said

gotcha987 time?

The Rickest Rick around the 20 minute mark.

Exactly. A lot of people seem to confuse "fighting" with "debating."

Tyson definitely has a real problem with Brian Greene though, astrophysics and string theory don't blend well and he takes it way too personally. If you watch him when Greene is talking he doesn't laugh and looks disgruntled the whole time. It's unfortunate because they're both such informative scientists.

@@patrickcompton1483 That's true

Thanks! I had no clue what he had said.

Jorge Ruiz 🤣

Remind me again who brought Football.. thats real Football into the world???

Captain Jack Sparrow china

'cause*

keshan Krauss comes off as a bit of an ass. I say this even though I know how annoying Tyson can be

@@alexwex123456789 Emotionally, they both have plenty of room to grow. And, I love you reply to the OP. I have no argument to it.

That's what it reminded me of too. I wish society would embrace this more.

That means he's a good listener. You can't learn and think at the same time. He is listening to everyone. He only comments when he's asked or he disagrees.

+quest 757 I'd say that's certainly incorrect. In order to learn you do have to think because that is the process for progress. Certainly if you just didn't think when learning and just processed all the information as fact, that is why everyone thought the earth was the center of the universe for so long. In order to learn things have to be processed and so rationally thought about in order for progress to occur.

+quest 757 he did not "comment" he interrupted others.

But Lawrence Krauss did a very good job to moderate the whole debate. He really appears to be able to read Neil's mind and calm him down by rephrasing his thoughts in a slightly more moderate way.

Ralf Oltmanns He did. He's good at reading the subtle cues and keeping things civil.

Brian Greene & michio kaku too

Michio kaku for sure Is up there

It starts at home. There are only so many NDGT's and Bill's to go around. Parents have to start allowing their children to experiment and ask hard questions.

Will your half right but no 1 needs to mimic Tyson and how rude he is And loud like A Neanderthal

This was eight years ago, and since then, Neil was right. String Theory is obsolete. Many grants and funding-many many grants and funding-have done nothing but been a waste of money. Greene is still spewing string in argument for this theory when it is proven it can not answer anything. In this timeframe we have a new theory, as of 2014: Emergence Theory-E8-of Quantum Gravity. Garrett Lisi found the answers with mathematical theorem, and with that knowledge has started a group known as Quantum Gravity Research.

internet literally made everything better

+Robin Could "I wonder if my tea and biscuits are ready."

+Sebin Puthenthara Suresh "Bloody hell,where is my turn mate"

+Joshua Gomez *when

+Joshua Gomez no. WHERE IS IT JOSH

+Robin Could I don't think he had any ill thoughts of his contemporaries at all. He was simply being the polite fellow he always is. and you know his mind is taking it all in and deeply contemplating all the while. That's the kind of man he is.

+xGOOFYJELLYFISH that's emotional maturity, not rationalism. look at niel and his frequent outbursts and underhanded remarks.

+xGOOFYJELLYFISH if you really look into it, most wars were started for other reasons. Things like religion, etc are just used as an excuse so one group of people can exert power over another. I'm not a believer btw. With enough scientific, economic, societal advances we can probably eliminate war completely.

Nice generalizations there

+Yijuwarp Scientific evolution is profited through ward, economics are seek through war, and society advances are means of war. Wars are created to be right over other people and assume they are inferior to them. Religion helped to think they were chosen, better people. Look at the Vatican and their Holy Crusades, previously that Religion was into that too, after that too, and in between many religions did that. Anything that divides people in different ranks create wars. Like civil wars.

+xGOOFYJELLYFISH That's complete BS. It's not because they are rational that they get along but because they are part of the same group. Put christians together or muslims together or jewish together and they'll get along just the same. The same in politics or for any field for that matter. And don't forget that they are there to promote science (and not to ruin the show of their friend who happens to be the producer of the show). Have you ever seen a debate between a rationalist and a religious? Most of the time, it's the rationalist that tends to go nuts. You can express your dislike of religious people but you can't just invent some BS theory from thin air to do so. Your comment is uncalled for and is based on nothing but personal bias.

Yes yes, that's because they are all clowns!

Yeeeeeaaah...there’s the GROUP of scientists...THEN there’s the journalist

you so funny - you laugh so much -

113 now

Stay Primitive My Friend Please keep uploading man, we miss you :/

It is possible but policies have to be created where educators have a stronger influence on the electoral collage so that any action they undertake will be based on objective truths

i wish i could put it to my son

@@brentbeepath7457 WOW...that doesn’t sound dehumanizing or fascist at all.

HIs aggression make him look like a neanderthal

@@brentbeepath7457 If education wasn't as corrupt as government that would be true.

Neil degasbag is full of crap. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h56kjcSA2pOXYJs.html

@@jeremiahdssdentmorgan3341 stfu you moron

Тhis audience in large numbers contains semi-literate shallow people and heavy snobs for sure!

Now Neil: coughs Audience: COVID POSITIVE!!!!

@@ssdivizion you sound dumb as hell please calm down...

@@Milky_Cum 🤣

trig and all the calculus classes are so much better ...

Mark Case Try doing calculus without algebra

mobcat40 They were trying to inspire people. Fundamentals can be cool. Algebra isn't.

Mark Case Algebra isn't cool only because you don't know enough about algebra to judge whether it is cool or not

lol alright

visa422978 Problem with Richard is he projects himself as an expert on waaaaaaay too many subjects. And because of his success in teaching evolution, people interpret his other subject views as viable. He needs to stop talking about religion, philosophy, etc. because he has no credentials.

i think you´re one hot lady, even though you don´t give a damn about what i think. Neil....he just loves the sound of his own voice...but he´s one cool customer.

***** Geez, you sound more like some chick, who is judging a man who doesn't meet her standards, which is as equally annoying as what you just said. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is just another scientist who is very passionate about what he says, and the fact of the matter, is that war does indeed fuel scientific progress and not the need for adventure in the government. Brian Green and Laurence Krauss were both wrong and were about to go on a huge rant about it. If you can't handle the fact that Neil gets passionate over misleading thoughts about what fuels science then you just need to get the fuck over it or get the fuck out.

***** Neil is actually the one with the open mind on the matter. The other scientists are claiming that X has to be like Y. Neil is saying that we have no evidence that X even exists.

***** Because you used the phrase "turn off" which makes it sound like you're judging his suitability as a mate, not as a scientist, which is something a chick would be prone to doing. I assumed you're a chick because your username is "May Been" and I don't know many males named "May". The man got passionate, you insulted him for it, I don't like people who make disparaging comments toward others who are unafraid to express their opinions with some gusto.

Have you noticed he does not dumb himself down so as not to make them look less smart?

Speaking up entiles you know the subject matters. Don't thank Tyson, know your subject matter & be able to articulate it very well that it generates interest in people wanting to know you more. Just speaking up is not going to cut it.

lol

+Aeroscience DNA. Your body is an executed program read from the compiling softwares called RNA holoenzyme polymerase and mRNA. Understanding how DNA works, how chromosomes work, understanding the genome and mapping the genome, all of that uses math. DNA is no different than old 1s and Os, except each of the tiniest pieces are two bits instead of one.

+Nigel Kirk in a sense you are right, but unless your discipline is bioinformatics most maths you will encounter and have to apply is pretty basic (although you will encounter maths in some form in every branch of biology)

I would be very surprised if biologists on that level don't have a solid grasp on things like probability, which is part of mathematics.

+Marcel Jones That might be true for high school level biology, but at university the bachelors and masters in biology requires just as much math as many engineering studies.

Martin Jensen i have a masters degree in molecular biology and i really dont need much maths. certainly nothing advanced

+joseph duenas WTF ITS TRUE LOL

And stewie to sound like Richard Dawkins.

He's got passion, certainly. And quite often, that's exactly what's needed to get people's attention. But just like a black preacher, he often runs the risk of resembling a bull, loose in a china shop...

teppolundgren He's just having some fun up there.

+Mahfuz Hasan Prethul: He gave his opinion about what he enjoyed in the video. How is that right or wrong and not just different?

+1

Gil CJ neil tyson is a narcissistic piece of shit

Thats not true the things that neil said were relevant

Well I wish it's my whole college career.

Same! That's why I'm here as well. I am a huge fan of both Dawkins and Nye!

Bobt Sims That's another thing that was weird. They loved Nye but hated Dawkins. They even acted like Dawkins disagreed with Nye for some reason, when they're really on the same page. It had something to do with the way he was sitting, I think. He was kind of leaning away from Nye and they said something along the lines of, "It's like Bill Nye has an aura that repels assholes." It's all nonsense.

Richard Dawkins is sort of... abrasive. He's honest and he speaks his mind. When he sees superstition he doesn't spare feelings while on his way to pointing it out. It has attracted to him the ire of lots of folks (religious folks mostly) in the past. And for some reason the radical "feminists" seem to hate him, never figured out why but it's most likely on some bullshit reason like most of the things they get their panties up in a bunch about nowadays.

Dawkins doesn't mince words, and tends to speak in a more calm and relatively neutral tone, as compared to NDT's or Nye's extreme enthusiasm. My guess is that those people on Tumblr didn't understand Dawkins or skipped past his chances to speak because they thought he was "boring;" in reality, while he's not the most enthusiastic or prominent member on that board, he has some of the best things to say.

Mattea Williams Yeah literally same, " tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance ". The post on tumblr used a screenshot and the position Dawkins was sitting in to push an agenda. They presented the photo as if the two had disagreed. I think they just did it for popularity on that post, using bill nye the prominent,social figure as the american champion of " yeah woo equality!" and Dawkins was presented as the antagonist. It was just an opportunity to get some popularity on a post but im glad they did it because i thoroughly enjoyed watching this whole discussion.

and then its government comes in and weaponizes everything the discover.

How was this never made into a meme. This is priceless.

@@masterpopeyoda3290 ikr. Make one rn!

And he showed him that his naive idea of why the Apollo program was cancelled was stupid.. I love NDGT and his realism. He's not some hippie scientist who thinks science should be good and a force for good. Atom bomb proves them wrong.

As much as I love Neil, that's my only critique of him.

I agree with Neil! He’s right though, it is working now! If and when it limits us we’ll try other things but the current math has helped us explain many things that actually work and can be predicted!

+It's Me I was about to comment the same thing. He gets so excited and I love it...when you walk into the room with Neil Degrasse Tyson, you have entered the no bullshit zone!

Walter M You got it!

Neil Degrasse Tyson is without a doubt a unique individual. But one thing that I think he might share with his other astrophysicist colleagues, one of the advantages of being (a scientist) in that field, is being exposed to the perspective of big things. Big things like planets, solar systems, galaxies, and black holes, and all those other wonderfully enormous activities that are happening everyday, but out of the consciousness of the average individual. I think when you observe these objects for a living, you adopt a paradigm of understanding long stretches of time in a new way, you develop a new way to use scientific theory that dictates using BIG generalizations to arrive at conclusions(assisted with mathematics of course). Its all so BIG that its necessary to think BIG to even be able to comprehend what small bit you can, dare i say you need to, to even be able to do anything in the profession. Combine this perspective with ( another very contrasting perspective) of the small. For instance a relatively inconsequential individual political event(a squabble between two people), or a relatively small period of time(say 1,000 years) that seems to be a defining importance in history, or even individual person. Bring these two perspectives together, and you've hit philosophers sweet spot. The elusive pot of gold that every philosopher looks for to make the most intellectually stimulated reasoning ,the contradiction. The contradiction is nothing more than two logical extremes that in effect mark the two polar 'flagpoles' of capable thought. Once the playing field is defined, its a cake walk just to start applying human reason to arrive at a hypothesis. That is to say, JUST THINK with as much honesty as you can muster. Now with your newly developed hypothesis and power of reason in your back pocket, just start SCIENCING till you cant science anymore. When your happy enough or just tired of sciencing, and decided you've reached the happy medium you can be satisfied with !VOILA! You're somewhere earth-shattering. Just look around tell us what you see. Obviously, because of his career,we know he sees the big. Just by listening to his stories and intricate knowledge of human historical events, and even current events we know that he sees the small as well. I think this potent combination of contrasting perspectives is what gives Degrasse his confidence. Its part of why, it always seems like he's saying "No, please, I've got something important to say." He's just telling us what he sees.

He is top-caliber "get-the-camera's-on-me" material and he stole time from others to respond. I get that he's all excited and tries to spread the excitement to others, but I find it a little disrespectful when he starts answering questions that weren't directed at him. And if you ask me, he smokes too much weed. How many times did he wander off and lost the point he was getting to? He should calm down a little, take a pill ... let some others do some talking as well.

Yet he says government should be leading the frontier to Mars, instead of you know, people that are ACTUALLY DOING IT, like Space X. If we follow his prerogative then we would never go to Mars with government backing because there is absolutely 0 reasons from the geopolitical. Its literally another world.