Well said. “That which can be asserted with no evidence can be discarded with no evidence.” Religion shouldn’t have privileged immunity, because religion is a truth claim. Also keep up your great work.

Another way of putting it is 'the truth is more important than your right to not be offended'

@Urrcreavesh I like that too

Agreed. I will gladly accept their criticisms of atheism too

@Urrcreavesh Well *_I_* care about your feelings - our Lord Jesus Christ commands it of us Christians, the majority belief system, in our democracy

This is what the video is all about. an "all loving" god cannot be that rude (in the eyes of theists) so it must be the devil..... But most theists will say "out of context" even if the full context is given.

TheThore Given that there ever will be or ever was a context that slavery is ok. Makes me fucking sick someone can actually think in the modern day that Slavery is ok in some context. Disgusting. Obviously this was written by man to justify slavery. What other way to tell everyone that owning slaves is ok then saying it came from god, the moral authority that is always perfect!

Or they'll say "lOoK aT tHe OtHeR vErSeS" and that God made slavery slightly better... but almost all the versus are for the Israelite slaves only... not for the foreign slaves... Or they'll just outright ignore the versus they don't like and continue saying "gOd NeVeR cOnDoNeS sLaVeRy" despite repeatedly quoting Exodus 21 and Leviticus 25:44-46 verbatim.

That's the whole point of the video. You're not saying anything clever, you're just regurgitating something that was deliberately made obvious

@@JohnSmith-xf1zu If ever a well hidden nazi cult creeps from the shelters, and in their bible are instructions for gas chambers, they will justify it as a humane command, to be read in the context of industrial genocide, usually by burning people alive at the time. In that nazi bible, Eichmann would be the prophet of compassion, and IG Farben would be lead by angels.

We just can't understand god's work

I'm loving this stereotypical comments

@@isaacnikolic3228 lmao.

You realize this is quoting the Bible right?

Yeah I think that’s what the message of the video and all the other videos nonstampcollector has made boils down too that god isn’t real and is inconsistent.

what does it mean to collect stamps? I speak english as a Second language.

It means exactly what it says. It's not an expression. It's just a clever name to mock religious simpletons who claim that *atheism* is a *religion*. Therefore, according to this logic, NOT collecting stamps IS a hobby. So, he is a NonStampCollector.

No AdHominem wow! Very clever. Just like his vids.

I do collect stamps, but only for the carbon. To keep that from entering the atmosphere. Never burnt any qurans or bibles, for the same reason.

No AdHominem Not collecting stamps is in the process of becoming an expression. Like "an offer you can't refuse" did in the 70's. When it evolved in a few years, from a salesman's lie, to a death threat.

Like Seneca was?

Andrew C Well, most of them come up with some kind of excuse. Such as: "We don't follow the Old Testament". Some others try to justify these verses...

That's just the thing: they don't read it. They have isolated verses read to them on Sunday morning (no need for context there, naturally). They are spoonfed isolated verses in pre-printed bible study booklets on Wednesday night which give simplistic answers to leading questions so they will reach the conclusion the bible study leader wants them to reach. They buy crocheted and framed wall hangings with life-affirming verses on them. What extremely few Christians ever do is just sit down and read the Bible straight through, whole chapters at a time, with an eye to gaining even the most basic understanding of what all of it says. So if they haven't read it or had it read to them, it will never challenge their beliefs.

Indoctrination can destroy the best of us, I remember reading all the horrible Quran verses and still stayed a believer until I evaluated everything

Most people don't look at it

Most people even don't know that there are such stuffs in bible, and some know but they say it's for ancient Israel lol

Bible and Koran Cagematch!

We're still waiting for you to publish a better one

@@MarcillaSmith But for some reason, the author isn't returning our calls...

@@leyrua Physicians have a creed which is relevant here, and that is "do no harm." To wit: eliminating a book which derives its moral foundations from blood sacrifice, racism, genocide, slavery, murder, and vicarious atonement is already a step in the right direction without even the need to discuss its replacement (which, by the way, any basically sane and moral person could easily do).

@@dolnick7 Well, if there's any "basically sane and moral person" present who would care to discuss its replacement...

They do, often. By saying things like: "You're taking the bible out of context." "Slavery at the time the Bible was written was not like the slavery of black people in America. They were more like servants and their owners HAD to treat them well." "God undeestood that his people would change over the centuries. At the time, slavery was appropriate because they didn't have the sMe knowledge that we do today. God is wise." These are the more common ones I've heard from Christian apologists. This isn't about logic or reasonable discourse. They fear death. Being wrong would mean they have to accept that they don't actually know for sure they will live forever. Maybe at least some of them feel that way.

damsra aus you dont make sence ??????/ by the way this is problem for jewish becuase they believe whats written is put untell judment day

ahmad jundi2 what?

Usually with replys turned off

Don't forget that using the bible's passages are ways in which Lucifer tried to make Jesus fail his fast

You should do a video about Deuteronomy 22:28-29. This is the passage where the rapist gets to marry his victim.

I love this comment 😂 an all knowing God would know that people would question his authority when it cane to modern moral vs ancient barbaric practices 2000 years from now. And yet it seems to me that nowhere in the Bible does it mention that the old Testament is incorrect, especially since Jesus even said that he came to fulfill the law (referencing the old testament). You'd think that maybe he'd be helpful in everyday life if he's all knowing

live slug reaction 😂

•O•

I always wondered if the devil was actually the hero of the story, promoting free will and an education. Unfortunately God started slandering him after that... 🤔 If free will is impossible without allowing evil, and evil is defined as whatever God doesn't like... it reasonably follows that God doesn't like free will.

The only People who consider this are Militant Atheists who suffer Reading Comprehension. For one Thing, it is not said to be an Apple. For another, it was not "The Tree Of Knowledge", and they were not Dumb Beasts before partaking of it. It was The Tree Of The its result was Shame and Guilt, not"Intelligence".Which isn'teven the same as"Knowwledge"anyway. As for God Lying, no, he didn't. The silly they didn't Die routine is idiotic given that They did eventually Die, and Evangelicals view them as Immortal prior to this and a Day need not be 1000 Years. There is also the Fact that Judicial Penalties can be Commuted. Which is the more Traditional View. You see, the Death Penalty was not something that just Automatically happened. Rather, it has to be applied. Just because God decided not to Kill them doesn;'t mean He Lied. But these aren't Things I expect people here to grasp.

@@skwills1629 Sure, make it a fig, but the tree is still called the Tree of Knowledge. Meanwhile, the Christian god itself mentions in Genesis 3 as it faces the two humans that now they “must not be allowed to reach out... and take also from the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever.” (Genesis 3:22), so yes, the deity did lie, as it is essentially saying Adam and Eve would have lived forever if they ate from the Tree of Life, regardless of eating from the Tree of Knowledge, so the warning that they would surely die from eating from the Tree of Knowledge would be fallacious both by the sheer time it took for the two humans to die (for the thousand years a day apologetics, I would wonder why your deity had such a human conception of time while supposedly making the universe and commanded the humans to allocate one day and not a thousand years for the sabbath; it becomes even more ridiculous to imagine your deity needing a rest after spending its equivalent of like 1.42 seconds of its time making the whole universe; I sure wonder how it even communicated with humans with such a different conception of time so that the prophets listening to it would not straight up turn to ash from old age) and by the fact that even if we assume the fig or whatever caused them mortality, (which is not even certain because the deity only mentions what the snake mentioned, that humanity “has now become like one of [us (the Christian deity)], knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:22), as the direct consequence of eating the fruit), they could have counteracted the mortality from eating from the Tree of Life, so technically the most important cause of mortality would be them being banned from eating from that tree. In any other context, if you ingest a substance from a bottle labeled “you will surely die if you drink this” as an 8-year-old kid and then you die like a hundred years later calmly in your sleep because the teacher forbade you from eating the green pill that supposedly will not make you die due to the contents of the bottle, just how seriously would you take the warning on that bottle? All the negative consequences besides knowledge that happened for Adam and Eve are conducted by the Abrahamic deity. One does not have to be a militant atheist to conclude that the piece of apologetics you presented that is more serpentine than the actual snake talking is fallacious as hell.

@@skwills1629 source of what you said with the tree? Still every single bible says that it was the "fruit of knowledge" or tree or whatever that the abhramic god made forbiden. What does that mean? Your sky daddy didnt wanted eve and adam to gain knowledge or else "they will become like god" Stick your religious prooaganda in your skull. This is an atheist channel.

@@theice5663 That doesn't mean Christians, or people of any religious persuasion, aren't allowed to comment on it. That's free debate, which is a good healthy thing. If all the commentators on this channel shared the same view, the comments would be boring as hell.

Hahahaha

hahahhahah yeah totally

Actually, Atheists who attack The Bible are more wedded to their own "Holy Book", mainly Videos or Websites like these. Historians, including Non-Christian Historians, would Tell You Slavery was not the same Institution in Antiquity as it was in the Antebellum South, and those same Historians would say Biblical Laws about Slavery are in fact better than those of other Lands of the Time and that Slavery was often Humane. Dismissing this as Mental Gymnastics or mere excuses is Rather evidence that You are far more concerned with Mocking Christians than with Facts. Especially since You make no effort to grasp this "Holy Book" is actually several Books, Christians do not typically see it as a Rule Book, and Christians Historicallyt Opposed Slavery, and were the First to do so. And I don't just mean the Transatlantic Variety. I mean in Late Antiquity.

@@skwills1629 HC! It's better slavery from the omni benevolent god! And "slavery was often humane"... No no, this is not mental gymnastics, you're just showing everybody how awful your moral, and the bible moral at it, is. Oh and if god said slavery is ok and you opposed it, you better be prepared for hell. BTW every atheist knows it is a set of books, this is usually pointed out because Christians see it as a Rule Book (capital letter just like you, see?)

@@caioporto9234 - You've just Proven my Point. I dint say "It was a better kind oif Slavery because Omni god said so", and not addressing my Actual Statements, and instead Twisting them, reveals this is about You being Evil and Tearing others down. By the way, Christians do not View The Bible as a Rule Book. That;s how Atheists Like You say They see it. Literally No Christian Says This about The Bible. Also, No Christian says Opposition to Slavery leads You to Hell either. Nor does The Bible say "If You don;t support Slavery, You Go to Hell". You're just Lying about it.,

​@@skwills1629​​ No, it says if you don't follow god's rule you go to hell. Yes many do. I've heard it again and again "the bible is 100% correct and must be followed" = rule book. You just have to go to other NSC videos (EDIT: comment section), specially the quiz one, to witness it first hand. Or you can just live in your bubble. "Biblical Laws about Slavery are in fact better than those of other Lands of the Time "... Biblical Laws about Slavery = omni benevolent god said so, better than those of other Lands of the Time = better kind of slavery. You said historians'd say that, but it' all just the same: horrible moral values. "You being Evil and Tearing others down" Oh yeah! I'm EVIL LOL

@@caioporto9234 - This is a Lie. *No, it says if you don't follow god's rule you go to hell. * Its God capital G. It is used as a name. And no, The Bible does not say "If you don't follow gods rules you go to Hell". You are an idiot. This isn't even a Rule. Its a Legal Code from the Nation State of Israel. *Yes many do. I've heard it again and again "the bible is 100% correct and must be followed" = rule book* Saying The Bible is 100% Correct and Must be Followed does not mean it is a Rule Book, and Christians also don't actually say that either. Many Christians do believe The Bible is Inerrant, and believe that its Teachings must be followed, but they do not view it a a List of Rules to Obey, which is what a Rule Book is. And no one can See the Book Of Ruth as a "Rule Book". What"Rules" are in The Book Of Ruth? . *You just have to go to other NSC videos (EDIT: comment section), specially the quiz one, to witness it first hand. Or you can just live in your bubble. * What You mean is, I Should go see Christina saying something else entirley that You Misrepresent to mean that. I['ve seen it before. The most recent Paulpogia Video I saw claims a Christian Apologist tells us to e Dishonest. I watched the Video then read The Transcript, and He never said to be Dishonest. Paullogia Lied. As did those in his Comment Section. But according them, He is telling You how to Deceive People. Atheists like You always Claim this or that is what someone said when they Really idn't. Misrepresentation iss all part of the proccess. *"Biblical Laws about Slavery are in fact better than those of other Lands of the Time "... Biblical Laws about Slavery = omni benevolent god said so* What I said was, The Laws regrading Slavery in The Bble were better than those of other Regions of the Time Period they were Produced. Not "Omni god said so". You are proving my point about Misrepresentation. , *better than those of other Lands of the Time = better kind of slavery. You said historians'd say that, but it' all just the same: horrible moral values. * Slavery was actually the best alternaitive. The other Two Options were Execution or Imprisonment. Prisons in ANtiquity were little better than Puts in the Ground. Unsanitary environments one could easily Die in from Malnutrition and DIsease as it lacked Sanitation. Most Slaves were actually Prisoners of War or else those who had cited Crimes not serious enough to warrant execution, or those who owed Money. And Slavery was not permeation in most cases, even for those not of Israel. Contrary to how most atheists like You out it. Then again Most Atheists Lie Yu say only a Jewish Slave was Freed fare 7 Yers, and if a Slave is not Jewish they could be Kept for Life, not Realising Israel was not "Jewish". You Simpy don't Understand the Biblical Texts at all. Slavery allowed You actual Survival and a more Healthy Life in the Open than did Imprisonment or Execution. Also, I am not a Fundamentalist Caricature. I View The Biblical Texts as Products of their Time, whose Principles are to be Lerned from but whose Historical Context must be considered. You do not. *"You being Evil and Tearing others down" Oh yeah! I'm EVIL LOL * You have proven You are Evil by Your Dishonesty.

Jean Luc Picard may I just say I always thought you were 'earl grey... hot'

Been there man, not a fun ride XDDD

Eyes both within and without! EYES BOTH WITHIN AND WITHOUT! Revelations was a fun chapter.

TheLonelyGoomba. Stuck between 2 pipes

🤣 emoji would

It has so many contradictions... Those who shave their beard go to hell, but those who don't shave their beard _also_ go to hell. One's first instinct might be to think that women might be safe from this particular contradiction, but they get screwed over by other verses.

I like your face

I like this statement

I like mac n cheese

I meant to say that they don't read their own bible.

When you go to church regularly you learn remarkably little about the bible.

The greatest knowledge they get from that fruit, is that the husband and wife that lived together discovered they were naked!

Well, there is this old darkmatter vid. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/adNgjLyqntLVoac.html

@@billyjoejimbob75 he did an Adam and Eve video where instead of an apple tree it was a disgusting bog or something. I can link it you if you want?

He who? NonStamp or Darkmatter? The one where Jeff put the tree out in the middle of nowhere?

@@billyjoejimbob75 it was non stamp but it's a similar idea to jeff

That’s the entire point - look at some of the other comments and you’ll see what I mean. The fact is that originally, Yahweh was the one who wrote and said this, without any such influence by Satan. This video is parodying that by making Satan almost equal in power to God, so that it almost makes sense than the actual book, in a weird twisted way. Satan, being the avatar of evil, is shown in these videos regularly outsmarting and gaining the edge over an all-powerful god of creation who is all-knowing and benevolent, turning his own kind actions into evils that plague the world. Compared to the original Bible though, it actually makes more sense despite the fact that Satan is on par with God, since it explains why God in the Old Testament and the Bible is frequently depicted as such a megalomaniacal sociopath who has killed people by the millions for not simply believing in him. By making Satan a kind of being that is the same power level as God, if not an even more powerful being than Yahweh himself, it gives more reason to hate Satan and to respect God because in the end he’s not entirely at fault because he’s either at worst incompetent or at best trying to stave off Satans influence. However, in order to believe that Yahweh is truly an all-powerful god of creation with none to rival him in power, you have to acknowledge the fact that God has committed atrocities of a high account, leaving no one to blame but Yahweh himself for his actions. This all in all leaves Christians to accept that either that God isn’t truly all-powerful or all-knowing, or that God isn’t truly as benevolent and compassionate as said Christians usually depict him. That being said though, what Christians believe is not at all influenced or waived by me. I personally believe that most Atheists or Deists though created by Christianity, and for good reason too.

@@datwitchyswordfanyou're kind of missing the forest for the trees. these videos tend to debate against christianity using their own scripture as the framework. this video differs in that it's using popular belief instead of recorded dogma.

Yeah, taking slaves is 'morally questionable' to say the least. No, streak that, it's actually not questionable.

I don't see it happened.

@@PatrickLedwig he rambled on about how it was progressive for the time and indentured servitude.

@@kayseek1248 - indentured servitude is another word for slavery, but it's still the same thing.

@@capitalb5889 they are very different historically, indentured servitude was a temporary thing as a result of breaking laws/not being able to pay, and other things, vs slavery is taking people against their will for life, generationally taking away their freedom

@@kingofgrim4761 - yes, but it is still a form of slavery. But more the point, the Bible has both indentured servitude and "people has property" slavery within the rules on slavery. Given the era, I'm sure there were plenty of slaves owned as property.