Thankyou so much Rick, your generosity is very much appreciated :)

You're awesome! 🥳 Thank you for your generosity and supporting Brief Case. 😊 Plus, you're a channel member! Fantastic! 😁

@@ChildfreeMatto i have been here for years. This channel and The Crimereel are awesome.

@@ricklee5802official.1Rope_fan It is wonderful you're a loyal fan of Brief Case. I do enjoy the content presented on here, he's very consistent with uploads and quality.

How do I donate??

Ain't that the truth 😢

Well we have no records from the “beginning of time” and if early humans had been so “sick in the head” humanity would not have advanced. Murder is not the result of a “sickness” in the head and certainly not representative of all people.

​​​​​​@@rashone2879 I think you're being FAR too literal, and in fact, murderers have been around for thousands of years, recorded or not. Do some research. People murder for many reasons, and there absolutely were, and still are people sick enough in the head to kill for no apparent reason except for the thrill it. They're called psychopaths. Research that too. Pretty sure they weren't speaking for everyone in their comment, so humanity would have advanced regardless. "Since the beginning of time" is literally a figure of speech. Cope.

@@rashone2879 Hmm .. I fail to see your logic. Why would murder or cruelty necessarily hinder the progression of society?

Many people sick in the head conditions still know the difference between right and wrong !!

Sadly evil does exist.

That’s a crazy assertion. A mistress - whether back then or today - is a grown woman who knows she’s having sex with a married man. Anyone dumb enough to have sex with a married person is responsible for their own heartache, and to take it out on the child is evil. Mr. Moore is responsible for cheating on his wife, but Ms. Pay is the ONLY ONE responsible for the murder. She’s disgusting. Clearly zero morals. Blaming the father for this murder is one of the weirdest things I’ve seen on KZfaq in a long time…

Thanks for listening

they tell parents their child is a runaway who will “come home when she gets hungry.”

That's generally the first thing that is assumed when 'any' child goes missing. And majority of the time it is true; however though that was the officers initial reaction, they did begin a search for the child; there did not appear to be any delayed search in this case. Though it's nobody's fault, the child wasn't reported missing for a whole day until the tea time because it was assumed she was at school.

@@NelsonStJames Do you have child abductions and murders in your country?

In this story despite their doubts police were sent to check hospitals, workhouses, and other places she may have been if she was injured. Too often you are correct, but not in this case.

Fantastic build up and narration. You keyed me in. Very exciting especially the court case and verdict. Thanks

Jealousy? Spite? General psycho......the firmer landlord lady.

Yes! That drives me insane too. I always reference the moors murders I can't even bring myself to write the names of that pair of monsters.

@@Ruth78620 EXACTLY 💯

I know that area of the river Medway very well. Long way from London for those days.

Maybe he used the poor child as the reason he couldn't leave his wife so she took her rage put on the little girl in the hopes the father would come to her. Just a thought.

@@Ruth78620 Indeed. And/or maybe it was her child and the father not allowing her to publicly claim her child drove her mad with fury.

She openly made the claim that there were other women who could have been involved. Yet nobody demanded she give her reasoning for such a claim. Now a days a person would be interrogated further about a claim like that.

@@Ruth78620 was what i was thinking

Quote: If i were wrongly accused of a child's death, would i cry out in rage in court against one of the parents? You had already answered your own question.

Thanks Holly :)

Thanks for listening

Thankyou :)

Thanks

I appreciate that, thanks Donna :)

Thankyou so much :)

300, thats good, thanks Crystal :)

Thanks for watching!

Sounds great

@@BriefCaseOfficial It was a good time had by all. :D

Good morning!

My thoughts exactly. I thinks she was certainly involved, if not the outright killer, but the actual evidence was so flimsy. It was very badly handled, even by Victorian standards. Where was the father? Where was this sailor? What were their True relationships with this woman? Why would such a diligent little girl bunk off school? Unless she was with someone she trusted? Why did she end up in a river in the accused´s village? To me that all rules out a random child snatcher.. Not a lot of it makes sense. Her outburst in court certainly showed she believed she had a motive. Why was nothing followed through? Poor little Georgina, her life snatched away, her body discarded like so much trash, yet no justice for her.

There was reasonable doubt. It sounds like the investigation and inquest were not compelling.

same

I believe she killed her. I don't have any way to prove it, but it just seems pretty clear.. and I just have a feeling. The woman seems to have a hang-up with Mr. Moore. She hinted towards him as the killer several times. So if she doesn't get her way, she gets even one way or another. If she couldn't have him he wasn't going to have a happy life again, but she could move on to her next conquest because all she lost was someone else's husband. Well, I hope that child's life was worth it.

She should have been tried for withholding evidence.

How nice!😊

Thankyou so much :)

🎯🎯🎯

I want to know what happened to Mr Moor, and mrs pay in the end .did they carry on living a normal life? Did mrs moor leave Mr Moor? Did mrs pay had a prosperous life afterwards or a miserable one?

Thanks :)

I would have also liked to see them ask her to produce the shawl. It wouldn´t have really proved anything of course, if they were so common, A family member could have easily acquired one, The evidence is all circumstantial., but at the same time it is also Very coincidental. The body turns up in her hometown, the timings, the sightings.. This is one of those where if I had been on the jury I would have had to find not guilty, but every fibre is telling me she wasn´t. She certainly knew a lot more than she was letting on. There is so much missing in this one. It needrf a Not Proven., but of course English law does not have that proviso.

She basically confessed.

@@jodygrulich8695 The sad 😔 part is there was no justice for Georgina. She was an innocent child and all of this.

Morning Cyndy

Thank you so much!

Thank you! You too!

Goofballs confess to crimes all the time. The police probably had good reason not to believe him.

Thanks for watching :)

I hope you enjoy it Marion

Thanks for watching

Thanks for watching

Wow, thanks!

I like that, and looking foward to next weeks :)

Thanks :)

Thankyou so much

Morning :)

Thanks so much

Thanks so much :)

Hope you enjoyed it!

Thank you!

Thankyou so much

Rich people?

Thanks for listening Lisa

Thanks for listening

Thank you!

Thanks

Thanks for listening

Thanks Sheryl :)

Thank you very much!

Thank you so much!!

Thankyou