Thanks! And yeah calling these sources like the one of Lactantius and Eusebius contradicting is an understatement. The way Constantine completely wiped out political opponents and killed family members from contemporary works, monuments, etc. is honestly quite an achievement. PS I have watched like 90% of your content so needless to say I also think you deserve a lot more attention.

Facts About Constantine They Have Tried To Hide: What people don't understand from your Christian brainwashing is that Constantine is the Little Horn of Daniel 7. He was the first Pope over The pagan religion of Christianity which had already existed that he used to bring all the pagans under one religion heading. All that was left after Constantine had killed off the remaining elect of Yahweh Messiah with his 11th Roman Emperor Persecution were the pagans. So he under Satan started deceiving the world with this paganism that we inherited from our forefathers who did not believe at that time when salvation was given to mankind. From that time salvation was no longer given. You can read about the 11 Roman Emperor persecutions with the 4th Seal and read about the outcome of them with the opening of the 5th Seal which Constantine opened with his last persecution. Constantine started this pagan religious government called the Papacy that is out to rule the world using Socialism of every form to bring their world order about. Constantine also built the Temple of God inside the facade of the Dome of the Rock where the Pope will move his Satanic throne to during the Papacy's 7 year Peace Plan after WW3. This is the "Abomination of desolation" that scriptures speak of when the Pope moves to Zion. Constantine also revealed what the Mark of the Beast/Papacy would be,THE CROSS, a sun symbol and a symbol for pagan Christianity. He also revealed who the personage was that has the number 666, THE POPE which is over all pagan deities and why he wants to be worshiped too. Constantine revealed who the Man of Transgressions is in 2 THESSALONIANS 2:3-7, THE POPE. Constantine worshiped the sun deity 'Sol' (Roman name for Nimrod) one of the two thriving cults that regarded the Sun as the one and only Supreme Deity (the other was Mithraism). Now lets go back to the Tower of Babel. when Yahweh changed the language to languages. Marduk, , Adonai, , Sol Angel, Bible, , Hell, Lord, Sacred, Jesus, Christ, Hades, Hell, God, Amen, these are all sun deity names and worshiped as the sun in many different cultures. They were actually worshiping Nimrod The word Catholic comes from the Greek and means Universal. Constantine used it when He made Christianity the Catholic/ Universal religion of the Roman Empire and no other religion was allowed. The Roman Empire engulfed the whole of humanity at that time. So that made it easy for the spread f this pagan religion that was sold as truth. During the Tribulation Period the last 3 1/2 years of the 7 Year Peace Plan, the Papacy will make Christianity the world religion and kill anyone that will not come over to it, just like Constantine had done. Constantine called a conference of Christian bishops far from Rome in 325 AD at Nicea. Constantine's intention at Nicaea was to create an entirely new god for his empire who would unite all religious factions under one deity. It was held on the summer solstice of June 21 - which in hindsight we will see was to honor the Sun. It was at this gathering that Christianity was born and the ramifications of decisions made at the time are difficult to calculate. About four years prior to chairing the Council, Constantine had been initiated into the religious order of Sol Invictus, Constantine worshiped the sun god 'Sol' (Roman name for Nimrod) one of the two thriving cults that regarded the Sun as the one and only Supreme God (the other was Mithraism). Because of his Sun worship, he instructed Eusebius to convene the first of three sittings on the summer solstice, 21 June 325.

"free from Hellenistic roots"? doesn't make sense considering they moved to the Greek half of the Empire

@@therealestg9 - Correct. Also that Greek philosophers had been flirting with monotheism since the Classical period, whereas the Romans of the west had only begun to explore the idea more recently. The actual motives behind Constantinople were more pragmatic. The city was located on a site that was more defensible than Rome. It was also located at the junction of major trade routes extending into Asia. The eastern part of the Empire was in fact more urbanized (going back centuries) and wealthier because of those trade routes. This is why the west collapsed first.

The Imperial solar cult never really worked that much, yes in the later empire it surelly finally caught on but it never had that much influence of cohesion and furthermore It had to build upon and contend for space with the Babel of layers upon layers of syncretisms, regional cults, gods, and conflictingnmyths that was hellenic polytheism. On the other hand Christianity was almost everything the empire could want, a simple clean and coherent theological system (well at least coherent enough compared to the other proposed options), the potentiality to achieve a relatively consistent and self contained canon (and in part it already had), plenty of divine justification for the empire, and most importanty it came package deal with an already active and functional proselitizing effort that given a bit of good old Imperial Seal of approval boost would save the state much of the pain of actually spreading the new state faith. Constantine, much like many other Roman leader, was a pragmatic politician and embracing christianity was mostly a politically convenient move.

So you believe a virgin got pregnant?

@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 he's saying that it proves Constantine believed in God

So someone converting to Christianity is proof of the Christian god? Or is there something I’m missing?

@@lovebaltazar4610That explains it.

@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 Ever heard of artificial insemination?

The voice is not so good

exactly

I know that's right because Roman catholicism is not Christianity.

He wasnt roman catholic, he was orthodox.

At that time there really wasn't a distinction between Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox. It was just the Christian church.@@yeetbagmcgee9376

That's not right. Constantine was a orthodox Christian. His bed side baptism proves his dedication to God.

By definition they’d all be heretics if not outright Heathens

@@heathenpride7931 heretic or schismatic but that's just fancy wats of saying bad Christian given that basically all Protestants are heretics but still considered Christian.

One coin is pure gold. The other is gold plated lead. Your assumption seems to be that both of are of equal value to the goldsmith. It is only in word but not in substance. The second coin is just as valuable only because the one wishing to pawn it off says it is so. There is no spirit of truth in this.

@@jdwagman ???

@@ikengaspirit3063 The 'gold" is God's word and truth through scripture. The coins are the religious doctrines, beliefs, and traditions. The coin which is pure "in scriptural truth" is valuable for pleasing God and receiving life. The gold plated coin represents doctrines and man made traditions and teachings that seem to be God's word on the outside surface but inside are false doctrines and traditions of men. The bible says that those who practice witchcraft and sorcery will not inherit the Kingdom. Just claiming to be a Christian but not upholding to it's requirements is worthless. It will only bring shame and rejection on judgment day.

Thanky

As someone who really loves and has studied Boudicca and antiquity Britain/Albion, I can give some rough answers. It is more than likely that if Boudicca had won, the Celtic tribes of Britain would remain united in a loose tribal confederation, but almost certainly not with Boudicca leading it. The 'High King of Ireland' is a very good comparison, as there already was a similar 'King of the Britons' position in Brythonic society, and so we would expect to see a successful unified Briton uprising that kicks out the Romans to give more power and privilege to this previously ceremonial title; however a woman holding this position would be highly unlikely. The Britons rallied behind Boudicca on a war cry to push out the invaders and punish them for the atrocities committed against them; namely the alleged raping of Boudicca's daughters at the hands of the Romans. Fighting under Boudicca as a symbol of the Briton fury is a powerful moral boost and propaganda tool, but women very rarely, if ever, were actually established leaders of tribes. In fact, what little evidence we do have suggests Boudicca wasn't interested in becoming some Queen of the Britons, she really just wanted to kill the Romans. The most likely outcome of a Boudicca victory is that she would have stepped down and chosen one of her politically aligned tribal leaders to take over, and in the face of the Roman occupation and increasing Germanic incursions into their lands, the Britons would likely establish limited political and military reforms to fend off against these existential threats. Whether or not this tribal confederation would survive the centuries and go on to form the basis of a unified, centralized Briton state strong enough to beat back Germanic tribes, Pictish incursions, and Irish pirates, or if it would fall apart and return to infighting tribes is really mostly conjecture. However, given that when the Romans invaded Britannia a king named Cunobeline had already managed to consolidate a lot of military and political power in the south of modern day England, I am personally biased towards believing the Britons would have been successful in uniting into a more cohesive and powerful realm.

Your assumption is that the Romans arrived purely as uninvited invaders. In fact there are some good reasons to believe they had many friends, allies and trading partners before they brought in their own troops. By no means were all the people slaughtered by Boudicca in Camulodenum and Londinium foreigners (ie continentals). Therefore a Roman defeat in the field would almost certainly not have united the Britons and a Roman return would have been almost inevitable. For example, there is evidence of Roman style villas being built in the south of England before the date of the ostensible "Roman conquest". The Romans preferred to represent the expansion of the empire as wholly military fetes because it scored political points back in Rome.

@@brigantiasmemerepository6439 I don't for one second think you have studied British Celtic history. You have a lot of guess work and out right falsehoods in your narrative. But I suppose when you decide to put in your own feeling rather than the truth this happens .

@@King_Cova okay, could you clarify what you disagree with? I feel my comment is reasonably accurate, though with a fair bit of personal conjecture (as I noted), so I would be curious to hear what gave you such a negative impression.

@@brigantiasmemerepository6439 Okay you are suggesting with what little evidence that we have on Boudicca that she would have just rolled over and gave up the power for someone else 🤣 okay you clearly don't understand Celtic tribes, power was centralised it didn't matter if you were a man or a woman, if you have the money the resources and the man power you were in charge (Christianity really messed this one up though, since most people are under the belief that only men are in charge because that's how the world has viewed it due to Christianity). So as the most power tribal chief in Briton no she would most likely have married another powerful tribal chief and consolidated their power together, as this is the the most likely outcome, not rolling over for someone else as you put it. The high king of Ireland, a false narrative an excuse for the English Norman's to invade Ireland and claim the crown for themselves, but there is no actual evidence there was a centralised kingship of Ireland, the only time this came back up when Robert the Bruce's brother tried to Unite the Irish and the Scots against the English. So comparing a false narrative to Boudicca isn't a great example. Now you see when you add in your own ideas the truth get away, yes I know I peppered in my own thoughts but it was literally to counteract what the mostly likely outcome actually was compared to what you thought.

You're either Brutal and Pragmatic, or you lose everything. I'm quite sure everyone, including Christians at the time, realized that.

@@catalyst772 Wrong.

@@catalyst772 - Well, *especially* Christians. Constantine himself was never a big fan of bickering over the finer points of theology. He thought that the (often violent) conflicts between early Christian factions was a case of clergy with too much free time on their hands. The Chalcedonian faction were the ones who were most successful at convincing the Emperor that they could impose unity on Christians within the Empire. So he supported them even though he didn't really care about their theological hair-splitting. Constantine didn't want a religion that was split into denominations, even though that was inevitable since it was already the case. Hence the subsequent centuries of ruthless attacks on "heresy" by church and state alike.

Priesthood kingship royal rule brotherhood of the snake freemasonry today has been the problem from very beginning its called the vril society's Arian race swastika Satanist blood sacrificing demons against humanity just so you know why do you think we rap our women and children and blood sacrifice them wack up.

I thought Constantine loved Christianity and fought very hard for it, rather than tolerate it

The HRE was a centralized state until the Great Interregnum

What if Egypt stayed Christian?

​@@KaiserFranzJosefI Exactly. Well, not centralized per se (feudalism was a thing) but definitely united. Had Heinrich VI successfully implemented his plan of permanent hereditary succession, the HRE would continue to centralize. With Sicily under Hohenstaufen rule, the Pope would find himself trapped. So potentially the Emperor could make himself the head of Christendom. An HRE with all of Germany and Italy could become ridiculously powerful under the Emperors.

@@aaronTGP_3756 As "centralized" as any Medieval State was. Nonetheless, the Empire came to become the caricature its known for after the Great Interregnum

​@@KaiserFranzJosefIThe habsburg dominated the empire until the rise of prussia tho

1. Constantine was the last Emperor with his, the 11th Emperor persecution that killed off the last of Yahweh’s elect. 2. Constantine’s killing of the last of the elect opened the 5th Seal. The 5th Seal is the rule of the Papacy and we are living at the very end of it as the Papacy is getting its power back. Yahweh destroys this system at His return. Constantine started it and the last Pope will be the end of it. 3. Constantine created Christianity, which has always been pagan to the core. Christianity was a pagan religion in Egypt and the Mediterranean area, so Constantine took that title to bring all pagans under one heading since only pagans were left after all Yahweh's elect were killed off. and took the scriptures and perverted them to make Christianity more appealing to all the pagans. Then Christianized the pagan holidays. Constantine's Christianity incorporated Saturnalia into the religion of calling it Christmas in the 4th Century AD. No such festival exists in the Scriptures. It is directly from Babylon. The origin of the X-mas Tree (X or “the cross” is the symbol of Tammuz and the mark/monogram of Jesus Christ) is actually the Tammuz/Nimrod Tree and has absolutely nothing to do with The Messiah or The Truth found in scripture. 4. Constantine created Christianity, so it would absorb all pagan religions and without denominations. At the time of the 7 Year Peace Plan the Pope during the Tribulation part of it, which is the last 3 1/2 years of it, will make Christianity the One World Religion and it will absorb all pagan religions and there will be no more denominations in it and thus, making it like Constantine had started it out to be. 5. Constantine and his pagan bishops made the scriptures void of salvation by putting pagan deity names and words into the scriptures and taking Yahweh’s name out. 6. Constantine is the one that gave the pagan names Jesus and Christ, also Lord and God to believe in to deceive the world. 7. Constantine in 331 A.D. had the 50 of his pagan scriptures done in the GREEK and the only ones allowed at that time. The Fifty Scriptures of Constantine were scriptures in the Greek language taken from the Hebrew and were commissioned in 331 by Constantine and prepared by Eusebius of Caesarea. I heard a priest on the radio 3/16/2022, say that he got to see the oldest complete bible in existence today with all the books, made in 332 A.D.when he was in the Vatican Library. Then he brings up Constantine and said that Constantine had 50 scriptures made,he mentioned nothing about Constantine having them done in the Greek though. If they still have Constantine's then it seems they would be holding on to the originals That Constantine had used to put his into the Greek. In 405 A.D. Jerome put Constantine's into the Latin, which became known as Jerome’s Latin Vulgate the only scriptures to be had for over one thousand years locked up in the Latin tongue and the common person did not know Latin. In 1516 Erasmus puts the Latin back into the Greek, which they are calling the original Greek today to cover-up that Constantine already had them made into the Greek. In a parallel fashion to Ardashir, Constantine bases his monotheistic religion on the "Holy Writ" of the New Testament literature, which he lavishly publishes in the Greek language for the benefit and edification of the Alexandrian Greek populace and the empire. He orders for the destruction of the writings of any opposition, and for the immediate execution by the sword of any citizens preserving illegal literature via actions of either the hiding or secreting of scrolls or codices. Imperial extortion was increased by the implementation of empire wide Chrysargyron (Poll-Tax). The Greek civilisation had experienced a peak of revival as early as Marcus Aurelius (c.160 CE) and as perhaps late as Diocletian (305 CE). It was known as the Second Sophistic. But Constantine physically severed the wisdom of the Second Sophistic from his new empire, and fashioned by Codex what was to become the Third Sophistic - The New Testament. 8. Constantine was the one that renamed the New Covenant to what it is called today, the New Testament, so they named the Old Covenant, the Old Testament to also follow suit. 9. Constantine changed the Roman Empire’s government from secular over religious to religious over secular. 10. Constantine started the Babylonian Religious Government System that is out to rule the world, the Papacy. "The papacy is but the ghost of the Roman Empire, sitting crowned upon the grave thereof." Constantine was the first Pope over Christianity. 11. Constantine became the first Pontifex Maximus over his Christianity, which is traced back to Nimrod, the first false messiah who started paganism and turned his back on Yahweh. Which is the High Priest over all deities, where the number 666 comes from. The Emperors were over all religions in the Roman Empire and they also held the title of Pontifex Maximus, which Emperors were over Secular over Religion, then Constantine changed that to Religious over Secular, If you control the government and religion, you control the people.

12. Constantine revealed who the “Man of Transgressions”, the “False Prophet”, “anti-Messiah”, the Pope / Pontifex Maximus. 2 Thess. 2: 13. Constantine made Christianity the State religion of the Roman Empire that engulfed all of humanity at that time. IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. 14. Constantine built the Temple of God known today as the Dome of the Rock, that the last Pope over Christianity will put his throne in and say he is over all deities and a deity in himself and will want to be worshiped. 2 Thessalonians Chapter 2. 15. It started with Constantine that this became totally Satan's world at that time. The only time in human history that Satan could deceive the whole world is between the last persecution by Constantine that killed off the last of the elect up to the 7 Year Peace Plan when salvation is given again. 16. Constantine did away with anything to do with Judaism. "You should consider … that we should have nothing in common with the Jews." 17. It was Constantine that made Sunday the day of pagan sun worship to be the Sabbath for the Christians, which has always been a pagan religionIt is the Papacy through the years that has made everything a lie. 18. Constantine’s mother, Helena who became Saint Helena. 19. It was Constantine that used the word CATHOLIC meaning UNIVERSAL for CHRISTIANITY. Catholic as a denomination did not exist until 1559 at the Council of Trent. 20.Constantine is the one that opened the 5th Seal. 21.The domed "Temple of God" built by Constantine in the 4th century is inside the facade that is called the "Dome of the Rock", this is where the last Pope will move his throne to during the 7 Year Peace Plan. This is the Abomination of Desolation that scriptures speak of. 22. Emperor Rome became Papal Rome on October 28, 312 A.D., Constantine exchanged the EAGLE for the CROSS: 23. In the fourth century, the Roman Emperor Constantine united all pagan religious factions under one composite deity, Hesus = Ea-Zeus, Ea was the diety of healing, Zeus a sun diety; Chrishna, Krishna, Christos, Christ, another pagan sun deity, 20. It is Constantine that Daniel Chapter 7, is speaking of who became the little horn. 21. Constantine changed both the Roman 8 day week calendar and the Hebrew 7 day week / new moon calendar. 22. Constantine revealed the CROSS as the Mark of the Beast. The Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol. 7, of edition 11, page 506, says: ‘It was not till the time of Constantine that the cross was publicly used as the symbol of the Christian religion.’ That was but logical, for Emperor Constantine was a worshiper of the pagan sun-god, whose symbol was a cross. 23. Constantine turned Emperor Rome into Papal Rome with only one religion allowed and it began with the CROSS!! A sun symbol. 24.. In the fourth century, the Roman Emperor Constantine united all pagan religious factions under one composite deity, Hesus = Ea-Zeus, Ea was the diety of healing, Zeus a sun diety; Chrishna, Krishna, Christos, Christ, another pagan sun deity, 24. Constantine introduced the Babylonian mystery religions into one as a Christian, a Universal / Catholic Religion and he made Christianity (Edict of Milan), the official state religion of the Roman Empire. a. J.C. Cooper, An Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Traditional Symbols, p. 45, aptly summarizes it, "Cross - A universal symbol from the most remote times; it is the cosmic symbol par excellence." b. The seven planets were considered the cosmos and these were referred to as universal. The word Catholic means universal and originated with astrology rather than with the Christian Church (Vance, page 8). c. Constantine also caused the sign of the salutary trophy to be impressed on the very shields of his soldiers; and commanded that his embattled forces should be preceded in their march, not by golden eagles, as heretofore, but only by the standard of the cross. (Eusebius, Life of Constantine, p. 545). Revelation 6:10,11 10: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Yahweh, righteous and true, doest thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth? 11: And white robes were given unto every one of them: and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season until their fellow servants also and their brethren, that should be murdered as they were, should be fulfilled. (They are waiting for the 7 Year Peace Plan elect to be killed as they were.) This is fulfilled in Chapter 19 of Revelation. Revelation 19:2 For true and righteous are His judgments: for He hath JUDGED the great whore (Zion}, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath AVENGED the blood of His servants at her hand. " When you ride the train of Christianity, You ride the tracks of paganism."

Sorry. First is " What if my dad finally found where the milk is"

@@historyrhymes1701 💀💀💀

@@historyrhymes1701 Video idea: 5 easy steps to heal that burn.

So they are canonized mistakenly, it looks like the Orthodox Church can and does make mistakes.

@@4emrys It's no mistake

You can’t really call another’s religion mistaken just say you’re prejudiced against it

@@arzhvr9259yes you can. You cant say its wrong, but you can definitely say it is mistaken in certain aspects, if the religions claims are proven wrong.

Yes, because good Christians have to do cruel and morally wrong things, and then repent when the time is right for them.... ???

@@melissadawson4668 hey man, life was turbulent in the Roman Empire. Emperors had to do bad things to secure the massive empires future. Pragmatism kept Rome afloat and unfortunately you sometimes need to sacrifice the morals of your faith for the good of the people. I'm not justifying the actions per say, but I understand why they had to be done.

@@saxtonhalegaming ... And things are not turbulent now? Immorality seems to always have an excuse.

@@melissadawson4668 Uh, yeah, things are not nearly as turbulent nowadays. Nowadays no one has a massive empire with enemies on all sides that could break with one bad emperor or one powerful enemy. Can you honestly say that the world today is the same place as when the Roman Empire existed?

@@saxtonhalegaming well, Russia and North Korea come to mind real quick... We could add just about any place in the middle east. These days, we don't need to have them right in our border. Shootings, terrorism... Heck, our own people attacking our capital building. We are on a dangerous path.

today's britain is roman britain, corrupted

Catholics won't like to hear/accept the Truth..

The mistake they made at the council was to switch the sabbath worship from Saturday to Sunday to appease constantine.

@@Animalsandwildlife.7527 false! Constantine had no influence as the practice of Mass on Sundays (the first day of the week) existed during the apostolic times. There was no change of sabbath which as part of the Sinai covenant. The covenant of the New Testament is separate and new. Mass is celebrated all days of the week but as Sunday was the day of the Resurrection it enjoyed priority

​@@davidblyth5495We dis agree , look at the doctrine and practice of the chatholic church? It's not pure Christian.

@@nugnorab5257 you can't even type a simple post - how would you even know what is Christian or not?

Blessed.

There is some evidence

@@deer563 there is enough evidence to understand that he converted

@@no_one699 he was only baptized on his Deathbed but you can't exactly be sure if he did convert

@@deer563 if he did not do that then tell me what about edict of milen.

It’s not the son’s job to please his mother.

I personally do not think he ever converted. His decisions were largely for power.

@New History Official I have wondered that myself they could probably annex Bulgaria because it join the central powers and since the Russians would get Constantinople it would be logical to link up their territories with Ukraine but I think if Russia industrialize quicker I think it would’ve if it won the Crimean war or This is another what if they are connected with three other whatever’s of the same person Napoleon if he invaded the Ottoman Empire instead of Russia ( The other two parts or what if Napoleon married a Russian princess and what if he never invaded Spain all three of these scenarios can go together into one big one ) because that would let Russia get a lot more influence and a lot more territory from the Ottoman Empire that either destroyed or extremely weekend and has lost all of its Eastern Europe territories because Bulgaria Greece and Serbia would all be independent but since they’re orthodox and Russia would get its part territory from the dying Ottomans it would be able to have more control and influence over it Slavic in orthodox brothers If you want you can take my idea of Napoleon what if’s because all three of them can go together and work together into one scenario

@New History Official hope you can get an order for your videos soon I like your videos I can’t wait to see the new ones And if you want to use the three Napoleon scenarios you can for any future videos

okay psycho

John 3:13

Blessed. Sanctus Constantinus ora pro nobis

John 3:13

@@Mediterraneus_Psychopathos *Sancte Constantine

chad

@@lordomega9959 ?

@@jimmynolet3752 you are chad

@@lordomega9959 no idea what your saying

@@jimmynolet3752 So chad, that doesn't even knows what a chad is. What a gentleman

@@antileneheranfouche5118 your tongue will be the first to go and I will carry it throughout the land and proclaim that I have cut off the tongue of a liar and slain the scoundrel who once wagged it

No it wasn't. Its pagan larp to claim one of the greatest roman emperors as not being a Christian.

@@iroga9764 exactly

@iroga9764 He was a Pagan for half of his life, you don't just throw away a religion you've been faithful to since birth because of 1 "Vision" that he got before the Milvian Bridge. He might've stayed Pagan till the early 330's when he was finally showing his age & had to slow down, the guy wasn't even baptized until literal hours before his death

@@iDeathMaximuMII To be fair he did it so late because he was mislead by the belief that he would only get all his sins forgiven if he was baptised in his deathbed due to all the gruesome things he had to do to stay in power In reality baptism is supposed to cleanse you of all sins period, past present and future, but it shows how despite truly accepting the christian God as his own his knowledge of christian beliefs was still limited and so in doubt he still went with what made sense to him according to his upbringing, like you said

Categories like liberal don’t map onto the ancient world

Also wtf are you talking about Zoroastrianism?

​@@arzhvr9259 lol... classical liberalism means freedom of us... neo-liberalism mean freedom of market AKA post-capitalist semi-feudal cyberpunk dystopia ...they aren't the same wtf is your question read about the late Persian empire the conflict between the Sasanians and Parthians

A Zoroastrian Inquisition? You don't say... Monty Python version: (Musical cue as inquisitors burst in) "NOBODY EXPECTS THE PERSIAN INQUISITION!"

There is afact about constantine the son of Helena catholic try to pretend he was founder the Christian civilization. But if reffer to history from first AD there were too many secret Christian society in Armenia Anatolia Georgia Syria mesopotamia Jerusalem Egypt even eastern europe ostrogoths,Dalmatia,Greece,Ireland,some part of Italy. before 312AD.

You can not defend the Praetorian Guard my man, it was time for them to go & Constantine was the one

As to he last "What if?" the Byzantine Empire may have survived and kept the Turks out of the Balkans.

The Eastern Roman Empire was the most anti-Hellenic empire in recorded history

RIP BOZO🗣🗣🗣

Depends what you mean by "conversion", if you believe baptism is required for conversion, then he didn't do it until his deathbed. Besides all this, much of the symbolism he brought in was pagan syncretism, and the form of Christianity he converted to was Arianism anyway, since he grew up in the West surrounded by Germanic society at that time. His father was a member of Aurelian's praetorian guard (Aurelian being the emperor who brought Sol Invictus and the Sun Cross to prominence in Rome), when you understand the context and significance of Aurelian it's not surprising that the "cross" became the symbol of Rome, but it wasn't a modern crucifix, it was the pagan sun cross, many such syncretism's happened during this time, such as the inexplicable setting of Christmas on the 25th of December, which just so happened to be the same day as Aurelian's Sol Invictus festival.

Non-sense Eusabios was an palate presbyterian, there are no proofs that Constantine supported his arianism. Single important detail is that Eusabios wasn't out of the church when he baptized Constantine.

@@pantelimon03 the church back then was divided between Arianism and the doctrine supported by the Council of Niccea. One could be Arian back then and be part of the Arian church. And it is known that Eusabios was Arian and he is the one who baptised Constantine so Constantine was baptized by an Arian priest which means he supported Arianism. It is what history records say.

@@eliasabourjeily999 There is no historical consensus on this topic. Single fact that matters is that Esebius was in the church, we even know that Constantine named Athanasius "man of God".

@@pantelimon03 for me Constantine changed from supporting niccea to Arianism and overall history was subjectively rewritten.

@@eliasabourjeily999 He supported Church.

there is no such thing as current Islam or past Islam there is only one same Islam.

@@abdolrahmanhamed2821 Nah , current Islam is the Hellenistic Turkish Islam !! Boy, their Atheist race change everything the moment they enter !! They entered Islam by politics & false loyalty of Ahl-Albait while their gatherings were based on their race superiority !! then started by killing non-Arabs who were loyal to arabs rule !! The whole world is shaped by Turks!! J6ws , Christians , Muslims!! They manged to reshape every religion According to their Atheist race background !!

@@l6ss Where is your own Academic evidences about these so called "current hellenistic Turkish Islam" that you are talking about so much kid ? Provide some clear and logical evidences behind your own stupid claims instead of roaring and barking like an emotionally cry baby kid.

jihadi war elephants

@New History Official just ask 😂 how have you been you have not upload in a long time

@@marcusaurelius9577 very fine I will not threaten you

The Bishop of Rome had always been the head of the Church. Pope Clement I. who is named in the New Testament and ordained by St. Peter the apostle excommunicated parts of the Eastern Church who had gotten out of line. Being in union with the Bishop of Rome(Pope) was always the mark of being inside or outside of the Church. “The Lord says to Peter: ‘I say to you,’ he says, ‘that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church.’ . . . On him [Peter] he builds the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep [John 21:17], and although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single chair [cathedra], and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity. Indeed, the others were that also which Peter was [i.e., apostles], but a primacy is given to Peter, whereby it is made clear that there is but one Church and one chair. So too, all [the apostles] are shepherds, and the flock is shown to be one, fed by all the apostles in single-minded accord. If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he [should] desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church?” (The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st edition [A.D. 251]

meh, shut up galilean

@@gearbear4530 Why should I lessen to you?

Christianity led to the downfall of rome and her culture

@@Randive then how come did it continue on in the East until 1453

@@justin36004 Roman culture became no more and Europe divided. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

Why would the Messiah bless any pagan practice departing from His word, mixing pagan practices including the name change ? Why did followers go along with Constantine’s Creed? Creed of Constantinople Church “I renounce all customs, rites, legalisms, unleavened breads and sacrifices of lambs of the Hebrews, and all the other feasts of the Hebrews, sacrifices, prayers, aspirations, purifications, sanctifications, and propitiations, and fasts and New Moons, and Sabbaths, and superstitions, and hymns and chants, and observances, and synagogues. Absolutely everything Jewish, every [TORAH] Law, rite and custom and if afterwards I shall wish to deny and return to Jewish superstition, or shall be found eating with Jews, or feasting with them, or secretly conversing and condemning the Christian religion instead of openly confuting them and condemning their vain faith, then let the trembling of Cain and the leprosy of Gehazi cleave to me, as well as the legal punishments to which I acknowledge myself liable. And may I be an anathema in the world to come, and may my soul be set down with Satan and the devils.” Stefano Assemani, Acta Sanctorium Martyrum Orientalium at Occidentalium, Vol. 1, Rome 1748, page 105. [Emphasis mine] Although the image at the top of this article depicts this Creed in Greek, the original was in Latin as recorded below: “Renuntio omnium mores, ritus, legalisms azymos panes Hebraeorum et sacrificia ex agnis, et solemnitatibus ceteris Hebraeorum sacrificia, vota, appetitiones, purgationes, sanctificationibus procurationesque et ieiunia et in kalendis et in sabbatis et superstitiones, et hymnis, et canticis, et observationibus, et synagogam eorum. Omnia simpliciter Iudaea omnibus legibus implicatus consuetudine ritus postea negare velitis et revertens et Judaica pravitate sive inventus fuerit comedens cum Iudaeis eis convivium, pro Christiana religione aperte an clam condemnare redarguens eos colloquentes condemnare vana fides, tunc et tremore Cain lepra Giezi adhaereat mihi ut et ego agnosco cui subiacet obnoxium. Et ego anathema esse in futuro seculo, et sedi cum Patre meo anima Satanam eiicit daemonia

this don't have sense

Yeah funny how that works, an infanticide gets away only by couple prayers. Christian hypocrisy

Explain how it proves God is real and has power? I'll wait. All I see was a Constantine story told in different ways years after it supposedly happened. The contemporary accounts right after the battle happened as well as his own actions does not support this story. All I see is an Emperor who became tolerant of other religions and probably converted late in life for reasons that may or may not be legit belief.

@@ravilcn He had a vision of the cross, and heard “conquer in this sign,” and one the battle and legalized Christianity after the Diocletian persecutions making him a great Christian hero. This is the historical account. He called the first Echumenical council and later was baptized a Christian and since him the Roman Empire became christian besides emperor Julian the apostate. The Jews rejected Christ because they were expecting a man who would liberate them from the Romans. And in Gods providence He did, not in the way they thought. And fulfilled all the OT prophesies. He overcame the world in an organic way, not like the Muslims through military conquest but through the faith, real love, charity, wonders and persistence of the saints and martyrs. All these secular scholars think there so clever mincing history and debunking God. These things are obvious but you refuse to have faith, and receive Gods grace, not because of logic, reason and knowledge, but because you don’t want to change. How much blind faith does it take to believe that nothing created everything, a world spinning a 1000m/h, millions of miles away from the sun and just warm enough to ripen a tomato. Even the atheist climate alarmist believe a few decimals one way or the other and we are all dead. And too believe that all the elements came from nothing, and that you evolved from lightning hitting pond scum. And what does believing all these lies get you, nothing.. We’ll if you want to be a fool for sin, I feel sorry for you, I will be a fool for Christ, and live forever in paradise! Praise God for his grace and the beautiful life I have, and that he’s spared my family from this most corrupt generation. Salvation belongs to Christ and holy Orthodox Church!

​@@austinfurgason3634 just the orthodox?

@@austinfurgason3634 where is the proof he had that "vision"? That is a story that came out many years after the fact. If he had such a vision wouldn't it have made more sense to convert immediately after the battle instead of years later? Common sense would say you would convert right away and worship this powerful god. Common sense says you would make it the official religion of the land. Instead he gave religious freedom to the christians, as well as every other persecuted religion in the Empire during that time. He never had that vision. It is a legend made up after the fact. As for christianity being spread peacefully as you have stated....Are you being serious? Christianity has as much, if not more, blood on it's hands than islam. I am amazed you can say that with a straight face. Worship as you please but you cannot prove your god so stop coming to threads like this and spouting nonsense. Science can prove the things you questioned. You cannot offer a SINGLE bit of proof for you god. I'll ask you again. Provide any proof that this story proves your god. You gave me nonsense that did not demonstrate any proof. In fact just provide a single piece of proof that proves your god. If you can, I assure you that you will win a Nobel prize. Since you can't perhaps you should stick to faith based discussions.

@@ravilcn I said in my last post how you have faith in make believe, and scientific impossible things. Of course there’s evidence for God. You just don’t want to see it because you love lies and sin. Creation is evidence of God, your ability to reason and conceptualize beauty is evidence of God, there is archeological evidence that what the bible said happened has and all its prophecy’s have come true, the dates and times of evident s in bible are proven to be in line with history. No Christianity was not spread through violence, the spread of Christianity around the world, is a testimony to the miraculous. Like Saint Patrick converting all of the pagan druids to Christianity. We’ll history says that miracles happened. One of thousands of story’s. And story’s matter, but because of your sickness your going to spend your meaningless life debunking them. Idk why I would type this out though your so hard headed. But I feel sorry for you, a meaningless spec of starburst meaninglessly debating me for nothing. Well if sure take the Muslims over you. Aithest have killed more in the holocost and in communist revolution then both of us combined. Because of your sad and nilhilistic, materialistic worldview. And your selfish ambitions to feed to the flesh. You have rejected Christ who came to sinners because of your foolish reasoning, to live in a meaningless world to justify living in whatever way makes you feel good. So feel good, and enjoy much because next comes torment. I feel sorry for you.

It is not a fact that Crispus was “white and fluffy.” After all, as was said, they were not freed from the curse of memory, although why if there was innocence? Konstantin was a man who could “give back.” Maximian was his enemy, but nevertheless, he first “bestowed” the curse of memory, and then canceled it. But this was not the case with Crispus, which hints that society may have blamed only the woman, but the emperor had a different opinion about him.