Come on guys can we just stop arguing about how Russian or American weapons getting destroyed in war? Because what is war without weapons destroyed? And what is a weapon if it is used by a bad user?

Wow just saw Top Gun Maverick and I already feel like a fighter Ace veteran.🛩

The SU-57 is probably my favorite plane at the moment

I like the way the SU57 looks compared to the others. It just looks so intimidating and has that weird screaming sound.

You forgot about SAAB 37 Viggen. It has reverse thrust capabilities making it super efficient and highly maneuverable in parking situations

Where's the f-16?

I always wonder whether current missiles really care about the pilots abilities these days. Modern missiles perform actions, that would kill every human AND they are faster. Additionally the concept of fighter jets now revolves around flying weapon carriers, which should be able to detect any incoming fighter from a far.

I wonder how the F15 STOL would have stacked up if Mac D would have made it more than a test bed aircraft. It was pretty advanced back in the day.

The TR-3B Just vibin with their 90 degree turns and Anti-Gravity

Nice

Произнося "маневренный самолёт", "dog fight", "сверхманевренность" сразу на ум идёт только СУхой)

Thanks for air force video

There is a saying in USAF "Dog fight left Russia, but Russians never left Dog Fight"

Мне интересно , что бы создали ребята из России и США если бы работали вместе над истребителями ?😊

10/10 vid for me

Now time to try them out in DCS :D

Since topgun sukhoi fighter series has been my favourite warplane and since i bought dcs i always pick it.

Indian Air force have Rafal, su 30 mki, mig 29, Mirage 2000, Sepect Jaguar, HAL Tejas , Mig 21 (out of service) Apache, chinuk etc,, IAF is proud of India

Eurofighter Typhoon at 7? You're nuts! Nothing short of F-22 and maybe Su-57 could out-dogfight a Typhoon! No other plane can maintain as much air speed in tight turns as a Typhoon, nor can any other plane, and especially pilot, conduct 9G maneuvers for as long as with the Typhoon. Also, even though the Su-57 is quite good, there are only a handful in existence, and unlikely to be more in the future, so not a real contender. Furthermore, Typhoon has the Meteor missile for long range interception which is a great advantage (even though not really for dogfighting).

Indian Air Force loves Maneuverable Aircrafts - Su-30MKI, MiG-29UPG, Rafale & Tejas 🔥

Russian jets; “look at us! We can do the cobra maneuver and literally stand on our tails!” AIM9X; “Hey look! That Russian jet doing the cobra maneuver is a slow, fat target with flaming hot exhaust that my seeker head cannot possibly miss. In the olden days we called those sitting ducks.”

How do you know the su 57 is the best when we know nothing about it and there is not even 20 in the world

I'm curious about the delta wings on European fighters. Why do they seem to only use them and why do US fighters never use them? What are the advantages/disadvantage and is there some difference in tactics and doctrine that dictate the different choices?

How many Su 57 actually exist? Raptorbait

Maneuverability cannot be measured on a linear scale as this video suggests. For example, an aircraft like the F-16 has excellent high speed and high G maneuverability particularly at it's corner velocity of around 450 knots CAS and at low to medium altitudes below 20,000 feet. On the other hand the F/A-18 has excellent slow speed and high alpha maneuverability and can be maneuvered even at around 150 knots CAS. Which one is more maneuverable? It depends, what kind of maneuverability are you asking for? The Su-30 will do all kinds of backflips and high alpha, while an F-16 will effortlessly maintain high Gs in a dogfight. The conditions of the flight will also affect maneuverability. In a high G fight, the F-16 is better at medium altitudes while the F-15 is better at higher altitudes. Some aircraft excel in specific maneuvers, the F-35 for example has a maneuver called the pedal turn that produces a consistent 28 degree per second rate. The F/A-18E and F on the other hand has a menuver called the "Turbo nose down" which is also excellent. So you can't simply say, Aircraft A is more maneuverable than aircraft B.

I read something about the typhoon the other day.. the American's top brass said nothing can compete with it agility.. not even there f22

I mean, I didn't see the top 2 fighters turn at a tighter radius than the F-22, just saying. You can figure it out on paper, but if they can't physically do it, they can't do it. I have a feeling the control surfaces of these aircraft aren't up to the task, stress-wise.

First time seeing a video who says the content of the video in its thumbnail and without click baiting u

The ability of the plane is deserves respect, and so does the the pilot....

How can Su have 3 entries on this list? It’s literally the same airframe each time. There’s no difference between them other than a few minute details. 27,30,33,35 all the same Su

Of course our Dassault Rafale is in the list Not a lot of people know that a Dassault Rafale beat a F-22 Raptor in a dogfight "training" in the past

Su 30MKI 🔥 🇮🇳🔥

I thought the Gripen was in the top 5 at least, I was sad to hear that it's only in the top 10

The su57 give me a break who ever made this video needs to do some serious research, the su57 they have only built 21 and 10 are on test the other 11 are serial, thet are having problems with the saturn engins.

the only reason why the su 57 is no 1 is because everyone saw it do that maneuver in top gun maverick and can't get over it, and all of this is off Wikipedia or just their own assumption. the gripen CANNOT do a cobra.

How much maneuverability do u want ? Russia: "YES!"

How does the su57 have a better thrust to weight ratio than the f22? I suppose it might be really light. It looks really big though

Again, great narration. Love that accent..

6 out of 10.

you are wrong. Russia has not been able to make trust vectoring engines work reliably and as such they are not using them in front line combat aircraft. second, stop claiming that doing the cobra is so hard. the move Maverik did in Top gun was the cobra. the first aircraft to do it was the antique SAAB 35 Draken. almost every modern fighter can do it. even many gen 3 fighters were capable. we don't do it very often because of the stress on the airframe.

Gripen should be higher up as it can go up to 13 gs

since the su-57 dose not leave the hanger lets say it out of the picture

I would argue Rafale (and not Rafael how can you talk about jet without knowing that ?) won against the F-22 and in a 1v1 (score : Draw = 6, Rafale = 1, F-22 = 0) in the UAE and won in a 1v2 and 2v4 against EFT

But maneuverability can't save you from proximity fuse equipped modern fox 2 missiles like AIM 9X

i would say that the su-30 comes 3 and the raptor 4th but more or less on the others its kinda an accurate list

good listing👍

how about J-10B，J-20 and su-33 ?

It is NOT the size of the dog in the fight; but the size of the fight in the dog!

The Su-57 on has that thrust to weight ratio with the engines designed for it which don’t exist yet. It has to use the engines of the SU-35 which are under powered in that big ass jet. It does really matter since it’s only built to show off a air shows with a grand total of 5 built and none on the way

Let me correct you,,, fighter jet with a delta wing are not manueverable..

4:05.... um.... pretty sure that pilot ejected lol

Wow

bro what's the " Raphael ", it's Rafale

the truth is all of this expensive toys will turn tail when confronted by a capable anti aircraft weapons 😂

Who could shoot first from farthest without getting detected and targeted?

Gripen is not called, gri P E N, its a long i, and a hard G and short "pen". GrrrIiiiiiipen... sounds so much better in swedish, meaning, like hippogryph or falcon.

This video was launched before Top Gun Maverick 😅😅😅😅

I'll take the eagle and the falcon any day

US Navy Carrier Groups, F-35B... What's the use of airplanes when the skies are closed and carrier groups are just a big target for Zircons.

Good for desktop...

Su 30 mki indian air force 🔥

f16: i will rate the shit out of any of these jets

If you have been made a bit of real research not eating propaganda, you have been found out that Eurofighter is way beyond everithing on that list in maneuvrability. Actually all of the delta wing designs are way way superior to the other on maneuvrability terms...

Where is the F-16 block 70 Viper???

true

Computer generated narrations is so funny while it mispronounces words.

I’m gonna take a guess that you saw top gun

Max Speed SU 75 is 1534,54 mph ( 2470 kph ) Mach 2

The Su-57 is drop dead gorgeous, it can kill on looks alone. TOP GUN MAVERICK Guitar MV kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j75iY9KEuNrFp3U.html INTERSTELLAR Main Theme Guitar kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsxyZ6irnq_FeWQ.html Killing Arasaka... | Cyberpunk 2077 Rebel Path Guitar MV kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jpmPfdWJ3NiYm2Q.html

Тор Gun 2 Cobra

The Su-30MKI.? I think the version of Su-30 SM or MKM can perform doing high maneuver.

the jas39 also has flaps xd and has other things to make it turn faster we cannot disclose further

Yo

Where is 10 generation jf 17 thunder that can maneuver upto moon 😅

Yeah

Stealth Deathmatch: Russia’s Su-57 Vs. The F-22 Or F-35 (Who Wins?) Yes, much is made of the fact that Russia’s Su-57 stealth fighter is not going to war over the skies of Ukraine in mass, nor are there many of these planes, unless you count a big appearance in Top Gun: Maverick. But in reality, how deadly are these planes in combat? How do they compare to the F-22 Raptor of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter? A former U.S. Air Force officer gave us his expert opinion: The big bucks box office bonanza of Top Gun: Maverick has, among other things, brought the Russian Sukhoi Su-57 “Felon” stealth fighter to the limelight for American moviegoing audiences, albeit in a cinematically embellished presentation. Going by the philosophy that bad publicity is better than no publicity at all, Vladimir Putin-his overall disdain for the West notwithstanding-probably appreciates the newfound fame being bestowed upon his country’s homegrown 5th generation stealth fighter, as not much else has gone right for the Su-57 program. Late to the Party and in Last Place… For starters, the “Felon”-yet another unflattering NATO codename bestowed upon a Russian-designed fighter plane-has the dubious distinction of being the Johnny-come-lately (or would that be “Vanya come lately?”) to the stealth fighter party. The Su-57 lagged far behind America’s F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II and Red China’s Chengdu J-20 Wēilóng (“Mighty Dragon”)in terms of timeliness of operational deployment. The fleeing Felon-or flying Felon in this case- began development in 2002, but didn’t make its maiden flight until January 2010 and finally got officially introduced into service on Christmas Day 2020. A measly total of 16 have been produced, with 10 of those being test models. A major reason for this long gestation period is that the Su-57 project began development (then known as the PAK FA) as a joint venture between Russia and India until India reneged because the long-delayed fighter failed to meet New Delhi’s expectations. To add insult to injury, the first Felon to roll off of Sukhoi’s production line promptly crashed shortly after takeoff. The tardiness of the Su-57 might not have been such a bad thing if, in terms of quality, the craft had lived up to the philosophy of “Save the Best for Last.” However, that didn’t quite turn out to be the case. Although admittedly a subjective ranking, the ever-savvy Alex Hollings of Sandboxx News rates the Su-57 dead last when he racks & stacks it against the other three aforementioned stealth entries. Here’s Alex’s rationale: “Radar cross-sections (RCS) are subject to a great deal of debate online and should always be taken with a grain of salt, but expert assessments of the Su-57 suggest that it boasts an RCS of about .5 square meters-which is about the same as a 4th generation F/A-18 Super Hornet when flying without ordnance and 5,000 times bigger than the F-22 Raptor. Stealthy woes aren’t the Su-57’s only problem - delays in Russia’s 5th generation engine program have left its Felon fleet operating the same AL-41F1 engines found in Russia’s non-stealth but highly capable 4th generation Su-35S. A Rand Corporation analysis of the aircraft’s advanced 360-degree sensor suite posits that the system itself remains incomplete as well, likely hindered by international sanctions placed on Russia following its 2014 invasion of Ukraine. These issues are sure to be exacerbated by deeper-cutting sanctions against Russia after its recent large-scale invasion of Ukraine.” (Author’s original emphasis) In case anyone’s wondering, Mr. Hollings ranks the J-20 at #3, the F-35 at #2, and the F-22 at the top of the heap. …But Still a Formidable Fighter However, all of these woes plaguing the Su-57 doesn’t mean that F-22 or F-35 pilots-or especially pilots of the 4th generation fighter planes-can afford to take it lightly should they ever have to face one in the ultimate acid test of real-world combat. This warbird remains extremely difficult to detect when approaching from head-on (which is entirely feasible during a fighter intercept). Combine that with 360-degree thrust-vector control allowing for fantastic maneuverability once targeted and a thrust-to-weight ratio about comparable to the Super Hornet, and you have a force to be reckoned with. In addition, this is a fast Felon that boasts the second-highest top speed of the bunch, topping out at Mach 2 (1,327 mph/2,135 kph), just a few hundred miles per hour slower than the F-22. Moreover, the Felon certainly packs a deadly arsenal, starting with its 30mm Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 cannon. (By contrast, a fairly big deal has been made of the fact that the ChiCom J-20 lacks a gun.). From there, it carries 12 hardpoints-6 internal and 6 external-that can stow either R-77M, R-74M2 or Vympel R-37 (AKA AA-13 “Axelhead”) missiles for air-to-air work. Meanwhile, whilst Su-57 has been deployed to Syria and allegedly to Ukraine as well, it apparently didn’t see combat in the former case, and reports of the latter remain unconfirmed at this point. Therefore, how the Felon actually performs in a hot war against 4th and 5th-generation adversary fighters remains a strictly armchair exercise at this point in time. ByChristian OrrPublished10 hours ago

Seen all these jets over the years, saw the SU-57 at MAKS and maybe the Russians were being a bit cagey with it, but the SU-35 was absolutely phenomenal and won the day hands down!!

There is only 3 - Yes THREE documented SU57's. They don't count. 🤣

this is kinda outdated typhoon tranche4 has upgraded their engines

Where’s the J20 ?

u.s. airforce philosophy in air superiority avoids dog fighting...it prefers bvr. meanwhile, the u.s. navy is concerned about pronouns that will not offend its crew members.

Liệu trong tương lai thế giới sẽ có máy bay chiến đấu Mach 10 như trong phim Top gun: Maverick????

Sounds like an unbiased (?) review strangely coming from Russian point of view?

Ma Quando mai il Su-57 è solo un cartonato da esposizione

💚💜🇺🇸

Rafael,Sukhoi 30 mki 🇮🇳🔥

In today's jet age dogfight, it's very clear that the cobra maneuver can easily be executed primarily by aerobatic biplanes of WW1 type built design performing below 95 knots respectively, An F22 going up against an SU57 both jets would exceed speed's of 120+ knots upwards 5g's to 7g's+. It true to say rhat its absolutely a sitting duck waste maneuver.

she prob watched top gun maverick

i thought F22 will be the 1st

Ok, most of this is moot as Russia is broke, they have no money and have defaulted on their international loans. You can't build planes with wishes and rainbows. They have 6 operational SU-57's and will not build anymore until these sanctions are lifted. Now to the planes they actually have...decreasing by the minute and not because of Ukraine, but because of lack of spare parts. Currently at least 60% of all Russian aircraft are on the ground and useless as they do not have parts necessary to repair (see sanctions above). Russia is about as threating militarily (conventional forces) as North Korea, if they are lucky. The only threat Russia is to us and the rest of the world is with their nukes which is why Vlad keeps bringing that up. If their military was anything but an anemic paper tiger they would have easily taken Ukraine in a matter of weeks, not including the potential insurgency which would likely follow.

U miss Chinese j16 jet

SU30MKI india🇮🇳 to SU30MKM malaysia🇲🇾

Eurofighter isn't as agile as Rafale. The Rafales won a dogfight against RAF's EFs with the score of 7 to 1 !! (check in internet)

No mention of the F-15 ? 100+ kills to zero. Flown against the best the Soviets had, the result was still a turkeyshoot.

I would put the f18 over half of these jets, closest thing to vector thrust without having vector thrust

I wonder if any Russian jet could actually compete with F15? Well over 100 wins, no losses is air combat! You people are not very smart or thorough. Oh, by the all F15 kills have been against Russian built jets

They say F 22 can detect and shoot first Russians: *Sun tzu art of Evading missiles with Supermaneurability and Built in Countermeasures*

Rafale IS better than typhoon .sofake informations....

So so so many Russian weapons. Not kidding those people design some good stuff

Already spoiled from the thumbnail.