Top 10 Most Powerful Fighter Jet Engines in the World

Рет қаралды 755,450

3 жыл бұрын

*Top 10 most powerful Fighter Jet Engines in the World*
Check out the Military playlist from the Buzz: • 10 Most Expensive Mili...
------------
Video description: Advanced fighter jets not only are equipped with advanced sensors, radars and weaponry. But the engine or powerplant that drives them is one of the most important factors so in order to provide better maneuverability, survivability, operational performance and reliability. A nation like USA have developed advanced engines to compete against countries like Russia and China. While these two nations have also started to build a clear technical lead in most aspects of combat aircraft development. Let’s see which country leads in this category.
“Top 10 most powerful Fighter Jet Engines in the World”
Enjoy watching. Cheers!
------------
Credits:
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.renderhub.com/
thaimilitaryandasianregion.wo...
------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Пікірлер: 1 200

@saptarsanandan8864 3 жыл бұрын

Now you can see many defence experts are giving their free lecture in the comment section 😂

@adityawaglearch 3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@arthurbenedetti9146 3 жыл бұрын

i don't get why people rant about people with an interest to discuss it in a video abou it

@najibghani5882 3 жыл бұрын

Are they for real

@najibghani5882 3 жыл бұрын

Are they for real

@saptarsanandan8864 3 жыл бұрын

@@najibghani5882 what you want to say?

@mickeyg7219 3 жыл бұрын

Just a note that the aircraft engine's rated speed is more of a range than a fixed number. Other factors including the aerodynamics of the aircraft and the inlet design. The design of the inlet can raise or lower the maximum speed of the aircraft by a whole Mach.

@taylorc2542 3 жыл бұрын

Not nearly a whole mach, but it can make a bit of difference.

@Smokeyr67 3 жыл бұрын

Aircraft engines aren’t “rated for speed” they’re rated by power

@mickeyg7219 3 жыл бұрын

@@taylorc2542 The B-1A and B-1B pretty much has the same engine, but the change from a variable geometry air intake ramp to a fixed geometry one dropped its maximum speed from Mach 2.25 to Mach 1.25.

@taylorc2542 3 жыл бұрын

@@mickeyg7219 They've gotten much better at designing inlets that deliver subsonic air to the fan while being stealthy. In clean sheet designs you can have stealth and speed from fixed inlets, and ramps only deliver marginal improvement. High speed from the B-1B was not at all a priority. It was a stop-gap bomber using a fixed architecture which they shoved out the door.

@terrywainman6050 3 жыл бұрын

It doesn't matter how powerful your engine is if the weight of the fighter is heavy look at the typhoon its weight is 11,000 kgs empty but with the two ej200 engines it can reach mach 2+ 1550mph and climb to 62,000 ft in 60seconds. The F35 can't live with that, the f22 engines are more powerful than the typhoon but because f22 is a lot heavier it's about the same speed and climb rate as the typhoon.

@abhihumzindahai.7765 3 жыл бұрын

America - We have PRATT AND WHITNEY F135. Russia - We have SATURN AL-41. China - we have Ctrl-C & Ctrl-P.😎

@vimalkumar3815 3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha beautiful reverse engineering 😂😂😂 but they never copy any engine...

@Blue_Pumpkin 3 жыл бұрын

*Ctrl-V

@ashmitanand77 3 жыл бұрын

I think 🤔🤔 it's windows + print screen

@fredh8065 3 жыл бұрын

@Tonya Patrick You talking about SpaceX with their falling rockets on farmland. Then yes, that is unsafe. Chinese rocket fell on the ocean. Standard practice and the US has been doing this for decades.

@JAV_tv555 3 жыл бұрын

everything starts from reverse engineering...China just start their R&D project few years ago...In the early period when japan start reform,they copy and learn from the west...and see thats how they become one of the leading technology country

@jokerface4491 Жыл бұрын

Rectification : Sukhoi Su-57 have Izd.30 new engine with 120kN class (27 000lbf) dry and 178kN class (40 000lbf) with afterburner.This aircraft can reach high supercruise mach 2 without afterburner.

@MsSincara2 8 ай бұрын

This is the best engine for a fighter ever made!! The Russian guys are very smart with the lowest budget than the US government, this is efficiency!! 👍😃

@apolloaero 5 ай бұрын

Correction, these engines don't exist in any Su-57 and are still in development as of today

@SomeGuy-ti1ln 3 ай бұрын

@@apolloaero production of al51 started last month with new su57 M variant

@USViper 3 ай бұрын

Lie

@NeroontheGoon 2 ай бұрын

Yawn…

@ares7522 2 жыл бұрын

AL-31F, FL and FP have 122,58kN thurst on afterburner then comes AL-31FM1 and FM3 with 132kN afterburner thurst (used on Su-27SM and SM3) then AL-35 for Su-34 with 135kN afterburner then AL-41F-1S with 145kN afterburner for Su-35S / BM, Su-57 and Su-75

@BBCRF Жыл бұрын

Ал-35 такого двигателя не существует

@USViper 3 ай бұрын

Garbage

@KOUKAROS-GR 3 жыл бұрын

Love you videos !

@kolbola 3 жыл бұрын

I see, why the GE F110 was mentioned only from the 100-120kN class US engines and why the PW F100 was left. Yes, the series F110, especially the UAE F-16E/F block 60 engines, the F110GE132 is more powerful than the latest series F100PW229 is. However, if we talk about the really top static thrust comparision between the F100 and the F110 families, there was a hidden candiate. In the late 90's, Pratt developed an ultimate version of the good old F100 to beat the performance of the F110GE129. While the GE was working on the F110GE129 enhanced version, the 145kN thrust class F110GE132 (new blisk fan, new combustion chamber, new turbine, new afterburner system), the Pratt&Whitney also implemented the latest-at-that-time features from the 5th gen F119 engines. It was the F100W229A (later it was called as F100PW232), under the project called "Thunder". The new, longer low pressure compressor section required a shorter afterburner housing to keep the original length of the engine. The new fan has much larger airflow and more: it has a unique 3D airflow design, which not required a variable supersonic inlet to maintain the Mach 2. The acceleration was phenomenal, around 2 sec it could accelerate from idle to max reheat. The thrust was incredible, 165kN, so it was same as the larger F119 had. The F100PW229A was tested on an F-15E Strike Eagle at the Edwards AFB in the summer of 1998. That plane had the same thrust to weight ratio as the famous F-15A Streak Eagle had during the climb record flights in the late 70's.

@haylocktransport6695 2 жыл бұрын

Yea I'm looking for engine for my fighter in the up coming war with China.

@SuperSuperka 2 жыл бұрын

D-30f-6 for MiG-31 was not mentioned, though it is most powerful Russian jet for fighters

@Shirish255 3 жыл бұрын

Good & Informative.

@bazookajoe4647 3 жыл бұрын

I have a GE washing machine that I got from my grandmother when I moved into my own place it's over 50 yrs. Old and still going strong 👍 Let's see if those other jet engine manufacturer build a washing machine as good as GE . Probably not 😉

@bokiNYC 3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын

You are lucky it's not a Pratt & Whitney washing machine :)

@abhineetsharma5575 2 жыл бұрын

@Master Mariner 😂🤣

@brikshoe6259 2 жыл бұрын

The GE J79 jet engine has been around since 1955 and powers the F-4 Phantom amongst other older fighters. The F-4 was retired from fighter duty in the U.S. in 1996 but as of 2021, is still in service in Iran, South Korea, Greece and Turkey.

@jabatanpendidikantinggitv8411 2 жыл бұрын

The leader of my country loves his Rolls Royce limousine so much. When our national airlines bought our 787 Dreamliner, GE offered their GEnx but he insisted on RR Trent 1000 anyway.

@Explorewithari4858 3 жыл бұрын

Keep it up best channel for defence lovers👍

@TurkVladimir Жыл бұрын

Thanks Again, Good Cool Useful informative Video.

@Roboseal2 Ай бұрын

I live in middletown where they make the F-135 and when they do testing (even with noise suppression) you can still faintly hear it roaring a few miles away!

@trichyfusion 3 жыл бұрын

Japan xf9 engine

@mdtransmissionspecialties 2 жыл бұрын

Left the chat.

@user-pc6oj6ht2m 2 жыл бұрын

@@mdtransmissionspecialties In the maximum thrust test, the XF9-1, which is scheduled to be installed in the F-3, has a thrust of 11t (110KN) or more without an afterburner and a thrust of 15t (150KN) or more with an afterburner. It boasts performance comparable to the engines installed in the American stealth fighter "F-22" and the Russian "Su-57". In particular, the "turbine inlet temperature", which represents the temperature of combustion gas, is 1800 ° C or higher, which is undoubtedly one of the best in the world.

@wileyeyefloaty665 Жыл бұрын

I don't want to hear boasts. I want to see roasts! The stiletto boasted a projected m2 or higher and look what happened thrre lol

@marsbars7584 3 жыл бұрын

I didnt realize the F-35 engine was that powerful, thats cool. I worked on the F110-GE-100 and 129 in the Air Force. Plenty of power for the little F-16 jet.

@kevinwiltshire2217 3 жыл бұрын

It has to be it's doing 2 jobs

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

Yes the F135 is the F119 re-aero'ed Core with a larger diameter low pressure spool for a higher bypass ratio. It has serious thrust. That was a requirement due to the ability to hover land the B model F35.

@Elthenar 2 жыл бұрын

@@kevinwiltshire2217 The F-35 is a heavy plane too. When fully loaded, it is going to take a lot of horses to get it off the ground.

@s4stats698 2 жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aq1ia9qimsXMh5c.html Aircrafts stealth comparison by RCS

@pedropistolero9230 2 жыл бұрын

American fighter pilots call the F-35 the flying turd

@georgepaul8512 3 жыл бұрын

Informative

@danielramirezcruz.2209 2 жыл бұрын

Super video very interesting...l love it thanks for posting.. great information

@SuperSuperka 2 жыл бұрын

But rather incorrect. D-30f-6 for MiG-31 was not mentioned, though it is most powerful Russian jet for fighters

@Mange070 2 жыл бұрын

Volvo RM8 and RM8B used in the SAAB Viggen-variants ( yes, i know that they are not new anymore ) but still very powerful engines.

@benjaminfranklin1777 2 жыл бұрын

Yep will keep accelerating

@MayurTajane-cq5kp 3 жыл бұрын

👍❤️ from India...🙏😎😀😍

@vinayakk2745 3 жыл бұрын

@Quiet Person he likes this channel's videos, what does it have to do with you?

@ashutoshdas865 3 жыл бұрын

@Quiet Person stay quiet..........

@overachieveruniqueness7869 3 жыл бұрын

@Quiet Person yes it becomes real cringe when ever I see love from India

@farosrohmangeloraramadan3897 3 ай бұрын

Dirty country 😂

@MrShadw-qn5gp 11 ай бұрын

I was looking for this kind of video for so long.

@sangtea_fanai 3 жыл бұрын

i always search like this video.... long time ago.... good video

@lakkchina 2 жыл бұрын

You forgot the Soloviev D-30F-6, 93KN dry and 152kn Afterburner

@Nithincr1 2 жыл бұрын

Yes Mig 31!

@essaidchibane6612 2 жыл бұрын

Now that's an engine.

@CoffeeAndPaul 2 ай бұрын

This is a video about engines in production today. The last D-30 was made sometime around 1993. If we're talking All-Time most powerful the Pratt & Whitney J58 is the most powerful military engine of all time. At the SR-71's cruising speed a J58 was kicking out ~150 kilonewtons, less than the Soviets' D-30 engine... or so Pratt & Whitney says. The J58's highest output spec is beyond 150 kN, we just don't know an exact number. SR-71's have been known to accelerate to speeds 270 miles per hour faster than Lockheed's specified top speed. A D-30 engine basically needs a full rebuild after full afterburner for any length of time longer than 60-90 seconds. A J58 can go full afterburner for hours. They were made to operate at their almost-maximum performance limits for incredibly long periods of time.

@privateer0561 Жыл бұрын

You can be certain the F119 and F135 are significantly underrated at 35,000 and 43,000 lb. thrust, respectively.

@turkishpatriotx 3 жыл бұрын

Good job

@rajeshkhichirao6897 3 жыл бұрын

I love your video......👍

@carlocalo3364 3 жыл бұрын

I can hear F135 pratt & whitney almost everyday and it sounds so great.

@Chris_at_Home 3 жыл бұрын

I live in Alaska about 20 air miles north of JBER. Right now Northern Edge is going on involving about 240 military aircraft. Yesterday I saw and heard 6 F22s at once and their exhaust was making that supersonic sound. I love it. Also see Blackhawks, C17s, C130s and AWACS. A few weeks ago I saw a formation at altitude refueling to the east. We can see a lot of sky at our home. Mountains 20-25 miles in a easterly direction and up to 100 miles in the west. I worked at PW&A for a few years in the late 70s on the assembly floor. I hear some climbing right now.

@justinfantastic4882 3 жыл бұрын

yes sir !! I Live in ft worth and f35's fly over my house to land everyday... nothing like it!! Even had the opportunity for me and my 5 year (at the time) daughter to sit in one at a local pilot meet n greet!!

@bobsink624 3 жыл бұрын

Funny, I heard the F135 broken down all the time was the reason congress considered to cut down the purchase numbers of F35

@mickeyg7219 3 жыл бұрын

@@bobsink624 The issue with the F135 engine is not about its reliability (the problem about turbine blades got damaged by the sand is old, it has been fixed since), it's about logistics. Kicking Turkey out of the F-35 program resulted in a disrupted supply line. The F135 has about 40% fewer parts than the F100 and F110, so it should be comparatively more reliable.

@bobsink624 3 жыл бұрын

@@mickeyg7219 thats not what the GAO said: The Government Accountability Office, a Congressional agency, studied flight test data and concluded that the reliability of the F135 engines is “very poor (less than half of what it should be) and has limited” progress for the F-35 program. www.americanmachinist.com/news/article/21898688/us-inspectors-raise-caution-on-f35-engine-program

@Nikhil-gg7jt 3 жыл бұрын

You left the Pratt and Whitney J-58 which powdered th SR-71 “Blackbird” .

@Stevonoles1 3 жыл бұрын

Not a fighter though.

@Nikhil-gg7jt 3 жыл бұрын

@@Stevonoles1 But yet a breakthrough in the field of fighter jet engines.

@alexlo7708 3 жыл бұрын

Or the Russian Mig-31 -> D30K engine.

@nikkotan2840 3 жыл бұрын

as u can see the blackbird uses a different kind of propulsion. It's called ramjet jet engine. In a ramjet supersonic air is supposed to be slowed down to subsonic speed inside the jet engine to produce powerful thrust. And there's a scram jet, in a scramjet the air is intended to move through the engine at supersonic speeds to produced high velocity thrust powerful than a ramjet, but the downside is u need to launch the aircraft in the air at mach 2 and above to fully utilize the engine full capabilities. But there's an topic recently about a jet engine hybrid between ramjet and scramjet technology it is called pulse wave detonation jet engine.

@mickeyg7219 3 жыл бұрын

@@nikkotan2840 That's a misconception, while it's common for people, even someone knowledgeable about aircraft to label the J58 engine as a "turboramjet" engine, it's actually a turbojet/turbofan hybrid engine, or more accurately, a variable bypass engine. From 0 to Mach 2, the J58 engine has a bypass ratio of 0, making it a turbojet engine. However, from Mach 2 and above, the bypass ratio of the J58 increase to 0.25 at a maximum speed, making it functions like a turbofan engine. Ramjet doesn't have any turbomachinery, all the air is completely bypassed.

@akshaygade8758 2 жыл бұрын

Good One !!!

@chrissu8529 2 жыл бұрын

Well done.

@ashutoshverma2633 3 жыл бұрын

GE had also developed Yf23 Black widow. It was very powerful but it didn't go to production.

@ziggystardust4627 3 жыл бұрын

GE developed the F120 For both the F-22 and F-23. Both airplanes were tested with both Pratt and GE engines. The contracts were determined separately and the F119 won, partly because GE’s variable cycle design was seen as too risky.

@qjimq 3 жыл бұрын

@@ziggystardust4627 I'm guessing it was more to do with the price per unit? We had one for the F-35 that outperformed the P&W by every measure and it was the price. Then they promised us the STOVL variant but nope. Can't build them in New England and compete w/ right to work states. I dare not mention the location but I bet we are talking about the exact same factory. 2 bureaucrats per production worker.... lol.

@ziggystardust4627 3 жыл бұрын

@@qjimq I was at Pratt at the time, and it was an IAM union shop (and, to the best of my understanding, still is). Most of the F119 work was in Connecticut, not a right to work state or one that was known for cheap labor. My recollection of the contract award when I was there was that GE tried a variable cycle engine with the F120, which was a risky approach that never had been tried before, unless you want to call Pratt's J58 that powered the SR-71 a variable cycle engine, which it kind of is. So Pratt had more experience on VC engines, but chose a non-VC layout. The USAF felt that GE's VC engine might present more development hurdles, although the technology was promising, and is getting a great deal of attention these days for future "multi-stream adaptive cycle" tactical engines (crewed fighters and drones). Many decisions on the ATF contract award were driven by risk mitigation, and one of the biggest reasons that the F-22 was selected over the F-23 was greater confidence in the ability of LM to deliver vis-a-vis NG, which had burned the USAF on the B-2 rollout. I don't have any special insight into the F135 vs. F136. I'm mostly trying to clear up the statement that the F-23 was developed by GE (it was a Northrop-Grumman airplane), and to explain that the F-119 and F-120 were tested on both the YF-22 and YF-23. There were 4 aircraft, 2 YF-22s (1 GE and 1 P&W) and 2 YF-23s (1 GE and 1 P&W).

@qjimq 3 жыл бұрын

@@ziggystardust4627 Right on, thanks for the reply. I didn't even notice the original comment mistake. I just saw GE and knew of the struggles and found your interesting comment. All the workers were pissed about Pratt, they believed it and so did I. Yeah, I bet they switched the F119 right over to the F135 but you went state of the art 1990 to state of the art 2000. We were trying to go job shop '60 to state of the art, lol. I heard they moved my line eventually but who knows, we did hit our mark and hired a bunch of people but it felt like a stop gap and I moved on to fix another line. When you're the ass hole kicking ass to hit a number, they don't like to use their own engineers or keep you around long after. Yeah, NG did screw that up, but you had to give them a shot, it was in their founders DNA. Nice chat bud, keep up the well informed comments. Notice I was asking if it was the price.

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

GE did not and does not develop Planes... Northrup developed the YF23 and the engines were provided by GE and Pratt & Whitney. The GE engines were inferior to the Pratt offering and were rejected.

@Kyle-xt8ip Жыл бұрын

Proud to see P&W at the top.

@deepjogi3668 3 жыл бұрын

Great efforts m'm🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🐾🐾

@VaibhavShete1981 3 жыл бұрын

Great

@TheFlanker47 3 жыл бұрын

Mig-31 D30-F6 jet engines, each rated at 152 kN thrust

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

LOL...

@avoidwomen6494 2 жыл бұрын

Russia makes engine for nasa

@_Coffee4Closers 2 жыл бұрын

@@avoidwomen6494 SO? NASA did use the RD180, because it was a cheap 2nd stage engine to use, not because it was super high tech. The RD180 is very old technology, it is not anything special. Are you so silly to think that the US could not make an engine like the RD180? Really, you think that? Maybe you have missed Space-X landing rockets back on the pad, or Virgin sending payloads into space, or Blue Origin also sending orbital missions and payloads into space or any of another dozen US Firms sending payloads into space. I think its pretty safe to say that US industry is quite capable of building rocket engines.

@renegadevoodoos3978 2 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers The USA can only create problems for the world and generate gays. All technologies are from the United States, stolen from others. And who is Elon Musk? The swindler of the century ...

@guptatroll2581 2 жыл бұрын

@@renegadevoodoos3978 thanks to USA you are using KZfaq hahaha

@nikospapageorgiou57 3 жыл бұрын

Pratt & Whitney J58-P-4 makes 151.24kN It is an afterburning turbojet with a unique compressor bleed to the afterburner.

@pablo-iu3lv 3 жыл бұрын

also forgot NK-32 almost 247 kn

@kellyhollingsworth6100 Жыл бұрын

Wasn't that the engine in the SR-71?

@Michael_Michaels 2 жыл бұрын

I know it wasn't from a fighter airplane but the absence of the Pratt & Whitney J58 is very noticeable.

@satyajitkshetrapal2643 3 жыл бұрын

Make some not ranking video, but next generation defence application.. like railgun, laser etc etc.

@alanurbaez8631 2 жыл бұрын

The Izdeliye 30 of the Sukhoi SU-57 and the checkmate.

@ricodelpiero 2 жыл бұрын

not in operational yet, it's still in test phase.

@Sajsigaloma Жыл бұрын

That is some great engine tho

@saptarsanandan8864 3 жыл бұрын

Hey buzz make a video on ISRO s future space projects🤘🏼

@slochan9435 3 жыл бұрын

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-10

@PipelineF35guy 4 ай бұрын

I am a crew chief for the F35A, and it is quite a remarkable engine. I get to do a lot of maintenance on these engines and a lot of it is pretty genius

@SomeGuy-ti1ln 3 ай бұрын

Heard this engine is a failure with frequent malfunction. USA is planning a new variant of it?

@PipelineF35guy 3 ай бұрын

@@SomeGuy-ti1ln can’t say but a GE would be real nice, I’ve worked on GE engines before and they’re definitely built with maintenance in mind most of the time but P&W made quite a powerful engine and it doesn’t malfunction as much as you’d think.

@SomeGuy-ti1ln 3 ай бұрын

@@PipelineF35guy GE is fine but with mediocre power output. I'd also witnessed over 12 crash of f35 in a decade, most of the crash due to engine malfunction.

@PipelineF35guy 3 ай бұрын

@@SomeGuy-ti1ln I get that P&W aren’t the best engines but there’s a lot of redundancy in most aircraft to where they aren’t going to crash. Personally, we take care of our jets here and if an engine malfunctions, it’s mostly on P&W saying the engine is fine even though there’s a crack in the engine, for example. What are your credentials/concrete proof that you’ve witnessed 12 crashes due to engine malfunction?

@SomeGuy-ti1ln 3 ай бұрын

@@PipelineF35guy i'd seen the news of USA planning a new variant for f35 engine so i wemt through f35 accident section and saw american amd korean f35 crash reports indicated engine malfunctions.

@mreid08 2 жыл бұрын

Pratt and Whitney factory is being built in Asheville to built the F35 engines, looks like a job change in my future

@aryanyadav3690 2 жыл бұрын

So the Super Hornet's Engine will be used in Tejas MK-2 ⚡ Thnx for info 👍

@nmarcel 2 жыл бұрын

I would like to see a fighter using two F-135, maybe the 6th gen plane that already flew.

@keithbell6104 2 жыл бұрын

Flying in the Mojave Desert

@siddharthgoyal4008 3 ай бұрын

It would be an overkill, even if you make a frame that strong the pilot inside is still a human. The G forces that such a plane can do will kill any human.

@nmarcel 3 ай бұрын

@@siddharthgoyal4008 that makes no sense. The G forces are in relation to the maneuverability (of acrobatic grade, needed for dogfights) of the plane, not the engines power. Take for instance the SR-71 (high power, low Gs) vs the Gripen (low power, high Gs).

@khanhonam7196 3 жыл бұрын

I LOVE the BUZZ

@user-jl9bw2iu6f 3 жыл бұрын

интересно ... а где двигатель ТУ - 160 ?!

@inspectormills3290 2 жыл бұрын

Got to love these verbal sales brochures

@rishithaurora 3 жыл бұрын

China: WRITE THAT DOWN!! WRITE THAT DOWN!!

@adamgt4037 3 жыл бұрын

Hahaha, Totally! Those guys can't make anything themselves.

@JigilJigil 3 жыл бұрын

100% true.

@irregular2329 3 жыл бұрын

@@adamgt4037 China's newest WS10 can reach 155kN of thrust with afterburner, better than russian's al31

@infoworld7706 3 жыл бұрын

China's WS10 series is at least on top 5 in that list, and it has vector nozzle, equipped in Chinese J11, J16, J10C and J20. But hey, who cares about what an Indian ranking says? China is just low profile.

@rishithaurora 3 жыл бұрын

@@infoworld7706 there's a saying in hindi for chinese products, "chale toh chaand tak, nahi toh raat tak"... When you figure that out, you'll understand

@Diego-kj4ip 2 жыл бұрын

You forgot the izdeliye 30 with 178 kN (39,680 lbf) from the Su-57 with afterburner and the most powerful is the NK-32 with 245 kN (55,000 lbf) Tu-160 with afterburner...

@xfnii1168 2 жыл бұрын

Tu 160 isnt Fighter jet

@vasiliyt8600 2 жыл бұрын

The izdeliye 30 is still a prototype and not used on any plane (except in limited test flights).

@dwizzleusa4202 2 жыл бұрын

Lol fighter engines

@dwizzleusa4202 2 жыл бұрын

Su57 al-41 engines still in prototype lol they suck. America with the new xa101 adaptive cycle engines. 50k plus thrust for fighter

@jerromedrakejr9332 2 жыл бұрын

@@vasiliyt8600 "except in limited test flights...", which in itself implies that the engine was installed in the aircraft and that the aircraft flew with that engine, which again implies that it is a very existing engine and has every right to be compared to all others engines from the list. Only one functional copy is enough to confirm its existence. The Soviet T-34 and American Sherman were made in tens of thousands of copies, and the German Mouse tank in only one copy, but those numbers will not change the fact that the Mouse was the largest functional tank in WW2. It's the same with this engine, it should and had to be on the list ...

@robmiller1964 2 жыл бұрын

Wow!

@prudhvi2354 2 жыл бұрын

Can you make video about airliners engines High bypass ,, about Life tbo

@user-nd6lg9nu6z 3 жыл бұрын

Надо помнить, что у F-35 есть только один двигатель с тягой 191kn, а Су-57 имеет два двигателя, по 147kn каждый, что дает суммарную тягу в 294kn

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

So? That is not the question being addressed here. No one has said that 2 engines combined are less thrust than a single engine. I don't see your point.

@user-ww3pp1xw5g 2 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers but you see difference between fighter jet angine and bomber one :))) ROFL

@StrangerHappened 2 жыл бұрын

A new version of the engine with 176 kN enters mass production mate this year. It has the best thrust to weight ratio: 12.5 and other six gen characteristics. But, it is not already in mass production just yet so it should not be in the list. I guess F-35’s engine will stay the strongest among fighters since it is the biggest by far. Though the plane cripples it: it can only super cruise for about 50 seconds.

@_Coffee4Closers 2 жыл бұрын

@@StrangerHappened The F135 can super cruise for over a 150 mile "dash". I don't know where you came up with 50 seconds. There would be few circumstances that would require anymore than that for an F35.

@StrangerHappened 2 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers Did you miss last years testing and regulation on this? “F-35C can only fly at Mach 1.3 in afterburner for 50 cumulative seconds”. Sustained super cruise as well as thrust to weight ratio as well as manoeuvrability are requirements for the fifth generation military fighters. F-35 is in effect only 4+/4++ plane as it fails in most requirements. And this is not a fault of the engine, which is outstanding and on its own perfectly capable of sustained super cruising by design.

@Jimbo-qe4gc 3 жыл бұрын

The trust of the PW F135 is amazing and so is the alternative jet engine to the F35 which is the GE/Rolls-Royce F136 because it has 43,000lbs of trust and could be upgraded to 45,000lbs.

@Jimbo-qe4gc 3 жыл бұрын

@Arthur Humphreysyou are correct! The GE/Rolls-Royce F136 was an alternate engine but it was canceled in 2011 leaving only the F135 for the UK F35B. As for the thrust the F136 engine was comparable to the F135.

@user-gc9qn2uz9b 3 жыл бұрын

In the first place is the Russian engine NK-32

@Jimbo-qe4gc 3 жыл бұрын

@@user-gc9qn2uz9b Keep on dreaming dude! Russian jet engines have less thrust, less reliable, and less fuel efficient! That’s why India chose the GE 404 for the HAL Tejas fighter jet!

@ivanlagrossemoule 3 жыл бұрын

@@Jimbo-qe4gc So India hasn't found an engine for the HAL Tejas yet?

@Jimbo-qe4gc 3 жыл бұрын

@@ivanlagrossemouleYes, they are working on the Kaveri jet engine and in the future it will probably replace the GE 404 engine! You know most jet engine manufacturers like Saturn, GE, PW, and Rolls-Royce have many years of experience in making powerful, efficient, and reliable jet engines. Any new jet engine manufacturer has their work cut out because they just don’t have the experience in engineering!

@pitriyanti549 2 жыл бұрын

terima kasih....

@oldfrend 3 жыл бұрын

f100 should be on this list. latest variants that power the f15c would fall in about no.5.

@EduSanjuan777 2 жыл бұрын

MOST POWERFUL ENGINES TODAY. Not 40 years ago. Is actually a good list.

@yadvendrasharma1014 3 жыл бұрын

Japanese IHI XF9 engine is not mentioned here!

@f-35lightningii6 3 жыл бұрын

Japan XF-3 engine 5th generation Secret from F-22 Raptor, ATD-X 5th generation with XF-3 engines 5th generation never project.. Japan XF9 is 6th generation with F-3 6th generation aircraft.. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_X-2_Shinshin en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_F-X

@luigiantonio4467 3 жыл бұрын

The new fighter that the Brazilian Air Force acquired from the Swedish Saab Gripen E uses the GE "F-414G" a very strong turnofan! 🔰💪💀🔰

@bjornnordstrom 3 жыл бұрын

The engine for Gripen E which is a derivative from GE F414 is actually also modified and built by Volvo Flygmotor (GKN Aerospace Sweden) and is called RM16 (RM12 for GE 404)

@luigiantonio4467 3 жыл бұрын

@@bjornnordstromoh, thanks! 👍😃🔰

@alexlo7708 3 жыл бұрын

@@bjornnordstrom So GE didn't sell them F414??

@bjornnordstrom 3 жыл бұрын

@@alexlo7708 According to the SAAB home page it is the GE F414. I guess GKN just makes some modification to it (and possibly manufacture parts and assemble it!?). Someone with more knowledge might be ale to answer this?

@luigiantonio4467 3 жыл бұрын

@@bjornnordstrom The F-414G is the RM-16 Volvo.

@mariuszjarzebski1394 3 жыл бұрын

👌 👌

@spitfirenutspitfirenut4835 3 жыл бұрын

These engines are basically modern upgrades of the Orenda Iroquois.

@kevinkarbonik2928 2 жыл бұрын

Nobody knows about those.. they are Canadian.

@spitfirenutspitfirenut4835 2 жыл бұрын

@@kevinkarbonik2928 Yes they're Canadian

@spitfirenutspitfirenut4835 2 жыл бұрын

@@kevinkarbonik2928 Orenda Canada pioneered the use of titanium in jet engines.

@and321now 9 ай бұрын

Pound for pound, the EJ200 is the best engine of the lot. Its power to weight ratio is absolutely remarkable.

@HesTNTonPMS 5 ай бұрын

great engine built on a tried and true platform

@swapnilkadam8094 3 жыл бұрын

I was waiting for these video. Tnq very much. Love from Mumbai, India

@Yogasefski 3 жыл бұрын

Does anyone know if I could have an RM12 installed on my 2008 XC-90?

@loay200091 2 жыл бұрын

the f22 one look amazing

@shawns0762 3 жыл бұрын

The strongest turbojets (not turbofans) ever are the ones fitted to the russian Tu-160 bomber if my memory serves me they have around 76,000 lbs of thrust.

@jemzbundzdobo7310 3 жыл бұрын

this are fighter engines, not strategic bomber engines, two different categories you dumpy, and the Kuznetsov NK-32 engine has a 31,000lbf dry-drust and 55,000lbf when using afterburners, so i dont know where your 76,000lbf comes from, the most powerful aircraft engine in the world is the american ge9x which have 110,000lbf of thrust, its non-military engine but still its the most powerful.

@shawns0762 3 жыл бұрын

@@jemzbundzdobo7310 Holy stupid batman, I know the video was about fighter engines

@aizazali3240 3 жыл бұрын

My favorite topic

@deepjogi3668 3 жыл бұрын

Is case study pdf available of this???????

@dataman6744 3 жыл бұрын

I like the bias disclaimer from the get-go

@manas2656 Жыл бұрын

Well the AL 41 used in mig 1.44 is different than al 41 used in su 35 and su57. There's a confusion because there are two engines designated as al41. AL 41 used in su35 and su57 is upgraded version of AL31 while the one used in mig1.44 was a variable cycle engine.

@georgealexandris8043 3 жыл бұрын

You are comparing apples with oranges ,engines made for twin engined fighters with singles ,plus specific fuel consumption is missing which tells a lot regarding the tech level of the engine and these just scratch the surface !

@kosiak10851 3 жыл бұрын

indeed, the comparasion is ridiculous!

@abhijitdhar2000 3 жыл бұрын

❤️❤️❤️❤️

@JosePerez-mf6ik 2 жыл бұрын

It would have been nice to have included the fuel consumption in the video

@seuamigof 3 жыл бұрын

The F-414 equips the E version of SAAB Gripen too.

@8bitorgy 3 жыл бұрын

The actual weight of the engines could have been useful

@Ste2023 2 ай бұрын

Mr Pratt & Mr Whitney you are best EVER

@gwiyomikim5988 Жыл бұрын

If you love specifications, this video delivers. I’m still a bit giddy!😵‍💫

@Inazuma68 3 жыл бұрын

How does the SR71‘s P&W J58 in comparison?

@MrDrow-bi9js 3 жыл бұрын

D-30F6?MiG

@alfalfa5271958 3 жыл бұрын

Some people do not understand what they read this is about fighter aircraft!

@s4stats698 2 жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aq1ia9qimsXMh5c.html Aircrafts stealth comparison by RCS

@srivinkaruvattil8797 3 жыл бұрын

Upcoming engine projects......

@perfectpluse3199 3 жыл бұрын

Please Make Same Program For Fighter RADARS , Thanx alot

@ankittara0009 3 жыл бұрын

Hi... Make a video on Japan new jet engine...

@BharathCalgary Жыл бұрын

Pratt and Whitney engines are just staggering here. BTW F135 engine is conveniently not shown, that is some engine... look up that engine

@sudhendugupte7562 3 жыл бұрын

India has yet to reach in this today thanks.

@adamgt4037 3 жыл бұрын

Don't worry they will.

@satyajitkshetrapal2643 3 жыл бұрын

India is like 1930' technology!!!!

@satyajitkshetrapal2643 3 жыл бұрын

India really needs to overcome this hardle. Indian defence index gonna changed very much only after a suitable reliable indigenous jet engine. Go India go!!!!😀😀😀😀

@joshuaguthrie8067 Жыл бұрын

hmm.. what about the F402's? seem to be missing from the list?

@jan_phd Жыл бұрын

What are the specs of the F145 Pratt and Whitney?

@vinodkumar-xt5zy 3 жыл бұрын

Jai Hind sister 🙏🏼🇮🇳♥️🇮🇳

@luigiantonio4467 3 жыл бұрын

Volvo RM-12 (Suécia) com 80 KN - Gripen C/D GE F-414 (EUA) com 98 KN - Gripen E/F 🔰Brasil💪💀🔰

@user-dw3nk2gv6u 3 жыл бұрын

Wonderful! Amazing F135!

@widodoakrom3938 Жыл бұрын

Not really it's single engine

@steventommy628 Жыл бұрын

F135 "It comes in two flavours" It's not a bloody ice cream FFS! Lol!

@ashishkumarsarma5359 2 жыл бұрын

India's Tejas Mk1A uses GE F404 and not GE F414 engine. GE F414 Is planned for Tejas Mk2 coming in 2022

@4everchild123 5 ай бұрын

Bro she also said MK2

@mouazalgeria9137 3 жыл бұрын

Japanese xf9-1 engine Force 147.10 kn

@zhalsan1965 3 жыл бұрын

Xf9-1 только испытания проходит, как и изделие 30 , на планер еще не поставили, только в планах до 2028 года, на истребитель 5-го поколения, а так да он самый мощный на данное время из двигателей

@mouazalgeria9137 3 жыл бұрын

@@zhalsan1965 Japanese sixth generation fighter And I mean the power of the engines, not the planes

@MoskusMoskiferus1611 10 ай бұрын

Can you makes something like this but with Turbopropeller engines

@righty-o3585 3 жыл бұрын

The Pratt and Whitney J58 produces more thrust than the F135. Not a lot more, but more nonetheless.

@FloridaManMatty Жыл бұрын

Are you sure about that? The F135 at standard military thirst produces 28k lbs and 43k lbs in afterburner while the J-58 reaches a maximum of 34k lbs, uninstalled at sea level. Installed and at operational altitude, it will produce significantly less due to the lower density of air at the inlet. If you’re thinking of the version of the J-58 used in the Blackbird family (A-12, YF12, M-21, SR-71), that type was a heavily modified hybrid Turbo-Ramjet that was in a completely different class. A standard J-58 produces significantly less thrust in all regimes than the F-135. I would love to see what kind of numbers a similarly modified and Precooled (SABRE type) F-135 concept could produce.

@user-vf6hz7oe7f Жыл бұрын

There are three exelcent tubrofan engines in China,Trouble also report. FWS10c(渦扇10C) Max thrust :13.2kn Thrust to weight ratio: 7.8 FWS15 Max thrust :18.1kn Thrust to weight ratio: 10.78 FWS19 Max thrust :11kn Thrust to weight ratio: 11

@TOx1CC Жыл бұрын

first one currently should be the saturn izdeliye 30 which outputs a max of 171.7kN of thrust with a TWR of 10:1.

@vimalkumar3815 3 жыл бұрын

We had Kaveri jet engine but there is more improvement required... Let's hope after some time we will get our own engine...

@peterneil6859 3 жыл бұрын

Kaveri engine 😂😂😂😂😂😂 sha----me....lesss in....di....an...

@vimalkumar3815 3 жыл бұрын

@@peterneil6859 don't worry dear, trail and error makes perfect💯 acutely developed countries never give there technologies to other country... What about ISRO?

@user-ws5ol7sb5k 28 күн бұрын

Russian NK-32 from Tu-160: -Ok

@user-qw5pg4nm7k 3 жыл бұрын

to put it mildly, outdated data. On the su 57 there is a Product 30, normal thrust 110 KN, afterburner 180 KN.

@user-ox3bp4rz3n 3 жыл бұрын

Western ratings are like Hollywood movies - Americans always win everyone!))).... well, well))

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

So you deny the P&W F135 is the most powerful engine currently in a Fighter aircraft?

@user-ox3bp4rz3n 3 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers I don't deny it, I mean else. I mean, the very criteria by which ratings are built are often based on what Americans are best at, rather than what Americans are worst at or mediocre at. Do you understand me?) For example, the thrust of the Tu-160M2 engine is 55,000+ lbs And this engine in Russia was developed under the USSR. The Americans still can not create the same for their aircraft.

@strits1945 3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ox3bp4rz3n even russia struggling to recreate some tech from ussr time. For ex engine for t80. Tu160 engine i not sure, seem they successfully rebuild, improve its recently.

@user-ox3bp4rz3n 3 жыл бұрын

@@strits1945 Yes, there are some technologies of the USSR that were irretrievably lost due to the collapse of the USSR.

@strits1945 3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ox3bp4rz3n mig31, project 971 sub. Those thing even the west dont have any comparable. In fact now back bone of the us airforce is f15, b52. Ye, hollywood tech dominant.

@flybobbie1449 2 жыл бұрын

Think Pegasus Harrier engine pushing out 19,000 lbf back in the 60's.

@ernestgiboo9006 3 жыл бұрын

It’s great to see so many of China’s great jet engine designs in the top 10.

@gabrielmarian698 3 жыл бұрын

Is Volvo chinese?

@ernestgiboo9006 3 жыл бұрын

@@gabrielmarian698 Shoot forgot about some of their business acquisitions. Poor Volvo .

@gabrielmarian698 3 жыл бұрын

@@ernestgiboo9006 they are catching up with WS. J20 and J31 looks good.

@hekrad 2 жыл бұрын

@@gabrielmarian698 but still long way to go

@gabrielmarian698 2 жыл бұрын

@@hekrad the gap is closing fast.

@siewbernard2558 3 жыл бұрын

China has plenty to catch up as far as jet engine development is concerned.

@miladirani4313 2 жыл бұрын

🖕🖕🖕from iran, 🤣🤣🤣

@Skankhunt-mv4vd 2 жыл бұрын

@@miladirani4313 is youtube blocked in Iran? You wouldn't want me to report you to your beloved ayatollah, would you? log off bro you are done.

@miladirani4313 2 жыл бұрын

@@Skankhunt-mv4vd I don't scare anyone bro , our life in Iran is big terrible and make me strong

@chenjoe6403 2 жыл бұрын

Chinese WS-10A is better than Russian al31-fn and have already equipped with existing fighter jets. More powerful WS-15 which comparable with American f135 is rolling out very soon.

@fordgtguy 2 жыл бұрын

@@chenjoe6403 I don't believe any statistics provided by the Chinese communist government.

@bogueji1 3 жыл бұрын

The most powerful jet engine in the world is the NK-32, it doesn't take much research.

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

Because people with actual knowlege other than propaganda from RT don't believe the fake numbers. Also, people with IQ's above 40 know that the TU160 is a BOMBER not a fighter.

@user-ww3pp1xw5g 2 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers People with IQ above 50 knows that jet engine is jet engine and you can place it where ever you want. To bomber, to figther, to boat, to chopper, even to TANK

@guptatroll2581 2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ww3pp1xw5g your IQ must be in the low teens

@Ehsan870 5 күн бұрын

I always thought that the engines on bombers were more powerful.. maybe that's not the case anymore. Coz I am sure the fastest jets like SR71 or mig 25 or mig31 engines must have some crazy numbers to achieve those speeds and stats.

@doncarlo5 3 жыл бұрын

what about the MIG-31 ? what type of engine is it equipped with?

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

A shitty Russian Saturn.

@doncarlo5 3 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers all righty! but if it is that shitty, how come it pushes the MIG-31 to almost mach 3 ? Where's the deal ?

@_Coffee4Closers 3 жыл бұрын

@@doncarlo5 Yeah and then you tear it down and reareo the whole HPT. Being able to go fast a few times does not a great engine make.

@doncarlo5 3 жыл бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers an engine that has mach 3.2 capability, can it be that shitty?

@zlk 2 жыл бұрын

It's the solodiev D30. It pushes the heaviest fighter jet in the world to mach 3, making it also the fastest fighter. It should be in second place on that list. Maybe they didn't include it because they consider the mig 31 an interceptor, but if they consider the F35, wich is almost a manned drone with shitty maneuverability, a fighter; then the mig 31 should be there.