Good idea

🤣

It's interesting this cop was laughing the whole time. So he feels when someone explains their rights have been violated this is somehow funny? Imagine being his wife or son/daughter?

Crazy how that works 😮

What a tyrant. How did this fool get to be a chief

He says “whatever” when he doesn’t know. He doesn’t give af

He's not playing stupid he really doesn't know like a lot of them don't, it comes from the top 💯🙌

He wasn't pretending ....😂

I don't think he was "playing" stupid. 😂

No he wasnt. If you have an ability to read someone, he mos def was standing by what he was told by the people he talked to, about the standing of that building.

Crooked and corrupt cops.

Poor leadership. Bad service dealing with the public. Public photography is NOT a crime. Police officers are public servants. THEY work for US. WE don't work for THEM. They swore to protect our constitution. It's not their police department ; it's ours. Taxpayers PAID for that building

Pitiful

Typical tyrants

Because the system protects him. We pay for all of it.

Well that is only if you believe the audio and video evidence, above the good honest police officers word.

Pitiful

willfull ignorance

Pignorance

That's how uneducated that police chief really is. Their entire police department seriously needs work. Because they're a piece of work. They waste their TAXPAYERS' 💰 by being feelings enforcement officers,and not law enforcement officers. Policy enforcement officers.

Because they are stupid.

You're absolutely right

Public photography is NOT a crime. It's not their police department ; it's ours! TAXPAYERS paid for that building. Police officers had sworn to protect our constitution. And boyyyy did they fail miserably.

Uh, no. It doesn't work that way at all.

Exactly

Does this jobless frauditor actually pay taxes? Doubtful.

Wrong as fuck

Good point

​@TTA42800 where does it say that it becomes public when the government leases from a private building its really hard to find much of anything.

Exactly!

Well said 💪🏾

Citation needed.

Post a link to any one of these "several courts" that ruled as you claim. I very much doubt any exist, but you could prove me wrong.

Mcaadoom you a 🤡

Cant post links on youtube, so go do your own research, and stop being a bootlicker​@@macadoom00

For sure 💪🏾

😂

Exactly

He sure did! Public photography is NOT a crime.

Good point 💪🏾

Same here, man. Never heard of him prior to a week or so ago and binge watching his videos.

Thanks alot..welcome aboard

Same!!!! James is unreal, love from B.C Vancouver< 3

literally same LOL

Lol, same!😂

Thanks, will do!

​@TTA42800 I lov🎉e the way you exercise your rights, the chief is clearly unprofessional.....keep up the good work James and I will continue to watch your videos WITHOUT HESITATION 👍 👏

You're absolutely right 💪🏾 thanks alot for the support 💪🏾

there is a difference between a private company being contracted by the government vs a govt body simply leasing a private building. so, this auditor, could be wrong.

​@leemelvin6514 It is a Federal body USCIS

Im not so sure. Part 45 begins with: This part prescribes policies and procedures for providing Government property TO contractors. Not contractors property to the goernment.

They are offering private disservice instead of public service now.

Exactly

@glenbrown8215 That right there shows you have that chief clearly considers citizens the enemy! Listen to him get aggressively combative as soon as he mentioned that was going to happen.

@@TTA42800 The chief isn't clueless about the private contractors now falling under federal laws when they are working for the Federal govt. He KNOWS that the citizens have the right to inspect the work and building of the contractor, he's LYING to you and does not care ! He's a tyrant and considers The People their enemy.

Tyrant Terminator Audits WILL BE BACK!! 👍

EXACTLY. This has been litigated in the courts hundreds if not thousands times, and in every case, if a Government Agency contracts with a private business or leases a building with our Tax Dollars, then it's PUBLIC PROPERTY or SERVICES. This "Chief Goss" needs to be fired, because he in his complete ignorance and not being willing to learn will ultimately cost taxpayers huge settlements.

@@theartistformerlyknownasth8612 - It's not Federal Property.

@@theartistformerlyknownasth8612 - No shit sherlock. You literally just stated (referring to the building USCIS is leasing): "amaganset press was talking about post offices, not all federal property". My reply was: "It's not Federal Property".

@@theartistformerlyknownasth8612 - Public/ Government entities leasing private property open to the public to provide public services, are subject to the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. If the public has a right to be there (in a publically accessible area to obtain services provided by a Government Agency), they have a right to film, and cannot be trespassed unless they commit a crime. As explained by the court in "AirLine Pilots Association v. Dept. of Aviation" (7th Cir. 1995) 45 F.3d 1144, 1149: "As a general rule, the conduct of private parties lies beyond the Constitution's scope." The court, however, enumerated four situations where "governmental authority dominates an activity to such an extent that its participants must be deemed to act with the authority of the state, [and] constitutional restraints apply." (Ibid.) These are (1) where there is a "'symbiotic relationship' between the private actor and the state," (2) "where the state commands or encourages the private discriminatory action," (3) "when a private party carries on a traditional public function," and (4) "when the involvement of governmental authority aggravates or contributes to the unlawful conduct." (Ibid.) The relevant clauses in this Federal 7th Circuit Ruling as it pertains to the Fourteenth Amendment and whether or not a Citizen accessing public services or exercising Constitutional Rights in Public, are #(1) [a Government Agency leasing a private building from a "private actor" for public/ civil purposes constitutes a "symbiotic relationship"]. #(2) Because State Agents "commanded or encouraged" private descriminatory action by contracting with the Building Lessor and violating Federal Law and the Citizens Constitutional Rights in a building open to the public to access or utilize Government Civil Services; In the case of #(2) it could be argued that though the state itself didn't "command or encourage the private discriminatory action", they caused the descriminatory action (arrest/ trespass/ Constitutional Rights violations) by the fact that they leased the building from a "Private Actor, Owner, or Entity". Whereas had it been a Government Owned Building, they might not have Trespassed or Arrested (or detained or identified) unlawfully the Citizen (when no crime had been committed) utilizing the services offered, there for lawful purposes/ conducting legitimate Constitutionally Protected Business (the business of the First Amendment/ News Gathering and Dissemination to the Public/ Journalism). #(3) because while the private party in such a case isn't technically "carrying on a traditional public function", the government agency leasing the building is (providing a taxpayer funded civil service utilizing taxpayer dollars). I would also argue in court #(4), because the Government Agency or Agents leasing the public building called police on a citizen committing no crime, and thereby they or the Police (Governmental Authorities acting under Color of Law) committed a Federal Crime/ Civil Rights Violations, by (or thereby) aggravating or contributing to unlawful conduct. tinyurl.com/3hazwuak

@@theartistformerlyknownasth8612 - What is Free Speech? It's the First Amendment, Video Recording in Public, and Newsgathering/ Dissemination of Information to the Public. Everything in that ruling applies in one way or another, and my legal arguments are solid. I'm sure I could find even more applicable Case Law if I spent time on it, and we could go back and forth all day. I will conceed the points you made about the USCIS office being open to members of the Public by appointment only (after researching it), and that may mean that you are correct. Why? Because the Government (leased or owned) is instituting "Time, Place, and Manner" restrictions on the building/ services, limiting access [and activities] to what might otherwise be deemed a public forum or publically accessible building open to the public during traditional/ normal business hours. That fact alone (and the fact that the building is not open for "walk ins") may mean that traditional Constitutional Protections do not apply. My question for you then, is this: Could or Would a member of the public, who had an appointment at the USCIS office, have a lawful right to video record their appointment/ interactions with Government Employees? Would it matter if they were a U.S. Citizen or Not whether they could film (or not)? I'm sure by now, you can respect my arguments/ questions/ rationale, because the Law in this Country is totally convoluted, conflicting, and confusing, [and I believe in many ways unConstitutional] even within single courts like the U.S. Supreme Court. Case Law is nothing more than interpretation and personal opinion of citizens (Justices), and they are Human also and many times get it wrong (usually not in our favor). Though I dislike Chief Goss's attitude, he may actually be right (and he's definitely right about fighting it in the courts). Unfortunately there are no more effective checks and balances on Government or between branches which protect the people. The only recourse we have is the nearly impossible, difficult, complex, and expensive Lawsuits (which ultimately violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by not treating government agents equally to private citizens). The various so-called "Immunities" (which should be abolished as unConstitutional: Qualified, Prosecutorial, Judicial) are almost never revoked. And the reason "Qualified Immunity" will never be abolished, is because the Politicians/ Legislators/ Judges/ Prosecutors, would never give up their own immunities; And they write the [many times Unconstitutional] laws, in their self serving criminal deceit/ tyranny against the people.

👍. Public photography is NOT a crime. Police officers are public servants. THEY work for US. WE don't work for THEM. They swore to protect our constitution. It's not their building,it's OURS

Thanks 💪🏾

Exactly. A military base has contractors working for them. Can you set foot on a military base and demand to film? His view point is so idiotic.

​@kevinvaccianna5785 Military bases are restricted for the public regardless who works on that base.

You're absolutely right

100%

You got that right ! I'm thinkin' about starting a POLICE POWERS T-shirt Brand to remind the Coproaches and OFFICE WEASELS everywhere they go about us: CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC CITIZENS. If they don't like it they can move to Canada or Mexico or Europe or China !!

great observation

And in Illinois they get a 75% pension 😮

They won't get away with it..TRUST ME

@@TTA42800 We definitely got your back brother!!!

​​@@TTA42800james, can you refer me to the follow up? I dont see it. Were you wrong about it?

Thanks alot 💪🏾 I really appreciate it wholeheartedly 💪🏾

I caught that cop double speak as well. Man, the camera shows these lying fools for what they are. And then it can be shown the world. This chief is a fool and everyone knows it now. What a moron. His most durable representation of himself will be THIS video for the rest of his LIFE. And why? Ego. Nothing more. The hatred of citizens with cameras who hold public servants to account.

@@GhostKyng hard to be a victim if they follow your advice....

Actually, he said he was trespassed just 3 seconds after saying he wasn’t at the 5 min mark. I do t even think he comprehends how trespassing actually works

Or I can just file a petition for INJUNCTION RELIEF.that way the tax payers won't have to foot their bill..

​@TTA42800 that's good

Where did you learn to talk? I'm guessing you failed english.

The Tyrant Teeeeerrrrrmiantooooorrrrr!

The Tyrant Teeeeerrrrrmiantooooorrrrr!

Frauditors don’t represent “the public”.

​@@lietofrauditWe the people. Auditor or not.

👍. For sure! Government contracts are NOT laws to prevent anyone exercising our First Amendment rights! That's a poor excuse if I ever heard one!

spot on!

Exactly

If they’re contractors, that relationship to the government makes them government officials, and their office is publicly owned. BUT that fact has NO relevance to whether that publicly-owned property is also publicly accessible. A prison cell is publicly owned but not publicly accessible, so if their office doesn’t have a public lobby open during business hours, it’s technically possible that the office isn’t publicly accessible (but I HIGHLY doubt it)

@@theartistformerlyknownasth8612he’s correct

@Chancentrane I am referring to the area where the public consumes the services. If they contract out a bunch of work that takes place in cubicles and does not have the public come in, then that is different.

You're absolutely welcome

👍. They're s-s-s-scared of c-c-c-cameras! OMG! 😮😅😅. They scared of TTA!!

They do not give citizens that same chance... but lady privilege is able to see thru the blindfold.

Thanks alot

Thanks 💪🏾

Basically

Are you kidding?!?! He's PERFECT for the job. Arrogant, lying, ignorant, condescending, corrupt, self promoting, egotistical, intellectually lazy and morally bankrupt to name but a few. He'll retire with full honors and a substantial pension all provided by us, the taxpayers. If his crimes DO come to light, the most he'll get is an offer to resign with a substantial pension..... :/

I agree 💯%❤

Agreed

I would have to disagree slightly . I agree that he has neither the temperament nor knowledge to be in law enforcement , he should be fired

We can dream.

Definitely 💪🏾

Thanks 💪🏾

Well said

🤣🤣

Exactly

Definitely

You're absolutely right 💪🏾 thanks alot

unfortunately they are all placed there and protected by the Freemasonic brotherhoood

@@TTA42800how is it a threat to tell you what is going to happen? You are the second dumbest frauditor I have seen . Arrogant and ignorant is no way to live life. Please go there again so the judge can put you away for a while.

That wasn't a threat, it was a promise. I think James should put it to the test. He'll then have the opportunity to argue his point of view in front of a judge. I doubt he'll man up and do this though. He's well aware he'll lose and be out of pocket. He'll just sound even more stupid and ignorant.

@@AndyinMokum you must be a bootlicker to the core. so sad!

This comment here. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 Me either.

@@BrownSugar1125 ❤️

@Kevin-rq5hd First of all, I’m not a little girl although I do appreciate the compliment. 47 years old September 1st. Secondly, what are you talking about? The comment was about the officer not agreeing about the disconnect between them and us(citizens). Also that the officer is giving tyrannical vibes. 🤔🤨😏

@Kevin-rq5hd No problem. You don’t believe there’s a disconnect between public servants and the citizens? Let’s take 1A auditors out of the equation.

@Kevin-rq5hd I don’t know if I agree with that. You can support and it still can be a disconnect. I’ve never committed a crime and I believe it’s a disconnect. Public servants are not how they used to be. My son has a mental issue. He had a psychosis crisis and assaulted me. Called the police who then called the paramedics. Paramedics weren't present for 5 minutes before leaving and told me he was going with the police. They pulled off and then took my son to jail. I showed all parties his diagnosis and had his therapist on speakerphone. Bailed him out and still had to take him to the Crisis Center here in my State. They kept him for 2 weeks. I had to pay 1035.00 which I didn't have, and because of that, I'm now struggling in the worst way. This is not the first time that these servants have done this. I was told by someone on the inside that the paramedics just don't want to sit in the emergency room. I cried and begged those officers not to take my son to jail. They lied to me about several things. If I had not been proactive with making sure my son stayed safe I probably would have lost him for good. My son has never dealt with the police and he is 25yrs old. He’s never even been pulled over before. No empathy at all from these public servants.

You're absolutely welcome..and thanks for the support 💪🏾

Thanks for the support 💪🏾

That's exactly right ✅️ you nailed it

You did the best you could to convince “that guy” that they were all wrong but these cops won’t admit their mistakes 99.999% of the time. And so the cycle continues…

So when a company has a order from the government, they become public servant by association ? Very communistic of you my friend.

Exactly 💪🏾

Thanks 💪🏾

Thanks 💪🏾

You're definitely family!!! Thanks alot 💪🏾

I concur...

@kelbale you are definitely correct, TTA came out the gate with the family vibe and stayed consistent, I've learned a lot from him, the follow ups are key, when they think that they shook him, I"LL BE BACK!

TTA❤💪🏽

You’re one of the frauditor’s goons who call flooded the police department and wasted my tax dollars by making the chief deal with you?

💪🏾💪🏾

​@TTA42800 why dont you do what he suggested? Go talk to the people. Come on big man, do some real investigating journalism. Or are you a coward that likes to waste the time of people actually working?

Thanks 💪🏾 God bless you as well 🙏

Definitely 💪🏾

God bless you as well 🙏 thanks for the support 💪🏾

When the chief is clueless, than the journalist can go to that spot and look what happens.

Thank you as well..

Yes, this “follow up” revealed a great result! It just proved that the frauditor behind the camera is spewing a bunch of utter crap and has no idea what he’s talking about.

You're absolutely welcome 🙏

you must live a pretty soft life if that's tyrannical for you.....