@@benefactor4309 and that ego of his is commendable

thats... sad.. :/ but chalo also good, i guess..

Yes, the ability to think clearly and rationally is more important than one's intellect. I think ego has always been the Achilles heel of the people from our subcontinent, so a wise person will always keep it in check.

Lol,this guy has really no knowledge.He says Mahabharata and Ramayana does not have any battle scenes.I have seen almost all good war scenes made in west.All of them pale in comparision to Mahabharata.

@@benefactor4309 Yes,his ego makes him think that he has the final word.Problem is he is not really an academic.

@Vishal Sorout jaat gandu not fart every where

Abhijeet Tnx for working hard to give knowledge free। the castiest just bugger of from knowledge pod cast go to some congi or commi pod casts।

"The Iyer Supremacy" was just for fun like Abhijeet Sir himself indulges in at times. Not a casteist remark 🤦🏽‍♂️

@@pranavkumar3782 chamar humour samjhna sikh

Chammar rock 👍 Mack silh socks😂😂

Well it is good it's just not the best choice for your particular situation

It will never happen because the amount of reading AIM does just brilliant.

Aditya bro, a History teacher has to keep to the syllabus, na. This is for enthusiasts, not for students. Even a UPSC Coach wouldn't get into all of this. History teachers teaching like this? If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. If not for KZfaq, you and me wouldn't even get to listen to this. But yeah, I fully agree, this was awesome. If only History classes were half as captivating.

It's not, it's lost the battle due to treachery of Gilani brothers.

@@shivaputrabiradar2960 yes. Plus the Vijayanagar king was a wannabe. He wanted royal validation as he was himself not from a royal lineage

Battle of talikota was lost because of Aliya Rama Raya’s arrogance. He was an evil man who imprisoned Krishna Deva Raya’s heir.

Thanks for this.

Great response, ty.

@@SurajsT-by9es There’s very little I agree to in this video, because this video isn’t fact based or research based but based on assumptions. I believe some of this response comes from British journals on Horse breeding in India which coincided with the Aryan invasion theory in the early 20 th century. Most Indologists in earlier times believed in the OIT and not AIT, but failure to fit in Christianity and western chronology into the OIT and racism resulted in AIT. Now Aryan invasion theory is incomplete without the horse, as the so called hordes of Aryans came galloping into India on horseback and destroyed the indigenous population, thus resulting in migration. Now without pondering on to the lies of AIT I will just focus on horses. Even if we consider that horses were not native to India and they came with the Aryans, what really happened to the breeding stock which remained with the Aryans? Did they die out? If yes then how did the indigenous horse breeds develop? And moreover how is it possible that Neolithic cave paintings in Bimbetka which predated Aryan invasion by thousands of years clearly show people fighting on horseback? So Bimbetka should have ideally been an eye opener for the Indians. Now coming to Indian horse breeds like the Marwaris, Kathiawaris and Sindhis, they have unique adaptations that are not found in any other horse breeds such as sickle shaped ears and the famous rewaal chal that you won’t find in thoroughbreds Arabs and Akal Teke. Again this proves Indian horses have evolved in isolation over centuries to develop such adaptations. Moreover the true history of desi horse breeds can be heard from the breeders who have bred these horses from centuries. None of their tales ever mention any import from Arabia, rather they claim that horses have originated from celestial three headed horse of Indra which is also a story that many middle eastern Bedouin tribes also believe in. I in fact can prove that horses had rather left Indian shores, as many Indian kings had the tradition of gifting horses and elephants, amongst many other riches. If we consider the OIT how did these people migrate out of the subcontinent. Alexander and precisely the Greeko Bacterians traded in Indian animals, such as the Indian dog breeds ( Indian mastiffs), Indian Zebus cattles, exotic Indian birds, horses and elephants. Alexander took a lot of these animals when he left for Macedonia. Even today a lot of Afghan and Arab horse merchants come to Sarankhera, Balotra and Pushkar cattle fairs to buy Indian horses, specifically the Sindhi Kachhi horses, Marwaris and Kathiawaris are banned from export. These Sindhi Kachhi breeds are prized for their endurance by the Arabs, and they have a big export market for such breeds. Now if you go to these areas (kutch) and ask these breeders, they would explain you that such kind of trades happened for centuries. Last thing I would want to add is that when in this video it was mentioned that horses in India were imported from Arabia, I would like Mr Abhijeet to explain, what was the scale of import, if import was so huge there must have been some record of such trade, what was the mode of such massive horse trade, as I would presume that these trades happened via the sea routes what was the cost of such massive imports, surely there must have been Arab traders who became extremely rich through these trades? Is there any Arab history of such trade and traders. Now anybody who is involved in cattle breeding and export would know that even in modern times, export of animals as big as a horse is a very expensive and difficult affair even with all kinds of modern transportation available by both land and sea, and I could very well understand how expensive it must have been in ancient times to keep up with such scale of import. Keeping up with the demand for horses back in those days this constant imports would not only be economically unviable but also impossible. And I would like to clear the air over the import of horse theory by asking this simple logical question that horses must have been the most important item of trade in these times if we go by this video, in that case who exactly controlled these kind of trade? And why such massive imports don’t find any mention in Indian texts? And why would such absurd trade happen when there are high quality native horse breeds available? Now let me explain you guys the true story behind Indian horse fiasco. It’s actually a British horse fiasco that dons an Indian hat. Britain was very late to the introduction of true horse Cavalry as compared to rest of Europe. Only during the Roman invasion of the island did the British realise the true potential of cavalry. Moreover being an island the British pretty much remained oblivious to the horse culture that was flourishing in mainland Europe. By the early 17th century the British could only develop draft horses that could not perform well as cavalry horses due to lack of speed. With Europe now navigating the world looking for colonies, having good cavalry horses became essential. This was an area the Brits severely lacked due to lack of horse culture in the island. The British fixation with cavalry only increased by the day as they were lagging behind the French and the Spaniards in matters of horse breeding and cavalry tactics. Thus massive import of oriental and Spanish stock happened in Britain, and they went on to develop the thoroughbred horse which essentially was a hybrid of Arab, Turkoman, Spanish and native horses. British however faced a setback when they started colonising India. Indian native cavalry in British war diaries have been mentioned as unmatched, with riders and the horses in-sync, almost to the extent that sometimes they have even been mentioned as demons riding out of hell. Indian Cavalry pretty much dominated the battlefield even after the Brits introduced firearms. Now it suddenly became economically unviable to import horses from Britain. British although would hire native cavalry for battle, the British officers found Indian stallions too fiery and difficult to handle, as the British cavalrymen was more used to riding geldings. Indians would usually not allow their horses to be gelded due to the sheer economic loss of doing so. The British thus established their own breeding program in India for constant supply of geldings for battle. The initial import of the stock began from Australia, where the waler horses were imported from New South Wales to kick start the breeding program. Australia by this time had a huge stock of horses including the feral horses that had originated from the imported stock. Australia was chosen as the destination for horse import due to its proximity with India and also because Australian horses could survive well in warm climates. Moreover Australia’s battle with feral horses now found a viable economic solution. The British then went on to import thoroughbred horses into India along with criollo horses from Argentina to keep improving the stock along with native horses. The Brits by early 20th century were able to give rise to the Indian half bred horses that became the standard cavalry mount for the Indian sowars. Now the issue with British breeding technique was lack of breeding stallions and excessive use of geldings in battle, which resulted in depletion of stocks. Such was the cost of horse import in British India, that the British parliament started questioning the breeding practices in the early 20th century, even to the extent of the viability of importing horses when Native stocks were well suited for cavalry operations. (Refer horse breeding in England and India and army horses abroad, by sir Walter Gilbey, pg 64, 65). The British in order to continued their cavalry operations in India cited that Indian horses were inferior for cavalry operations. It was during this time the AIT picked up pace, and thus this fiasco pertaining to Indian horse breeding, as AIT also helped the Brits establish inferiority of Indian horses, by making it look alien and exotic to the Indians. Obviously Indians have not done any research on their horse culture and have considered horses to be alien. These British horse theories were later picked up by communist and leftist historians, portraying India as a nation that was not up to date with their military technology, had no martial traditions and severely lacked horse culture, which resulted in the defeat of Hindu kings in the hands of superior Central Asian horse archers. They even went on to glorify the Turkish and Arab horsemen, which now seems to have been accepted by the Indians as a gospel truth, to the extent that any counter and logical narrative is met with accusation of being Ethno Nationalist. I ask such people, in a multi ethnic country like ours which ethnicity are you really accusing? I rest my argument here saying that Indian horse culture was the centre stage of Indian resistance to Islamic and European invasions which should never be undermined.

I think aim have to see majid bhai comment. Absolutely mind blowing.

Brilliant riposte! Please do a video response and post it here as people need to see. People get swayed by the charisma of brilliant speakers like Abhijit and forget objectivity and truth.

It’s wrong information. Please do your homework before buying any crap information

@@vidyalaxmi466 i have seen many of your comments claiming AIM is giving wrong information, I also believe that he has some sort of mindset that Indians never invented anything, nd this leads him to derecognise the Indian contribution to war science, can u give some sources where u find Aim pov in this video wrong, I would like to watch or read them too

@Alexios I Komnenos 😂😂

AIM is all anti India totally forgetting the excellent use of Bhimtadi ponies which were a local breed and which out performed Central Asian horses .... this is no different than AIM crying horse on why desi guns were not selected over foreign..... when u like muppet reject local horses with excellent track record over the delicate and only capable of running on flats ... out of India horses ..... the same mentality is still harboured by our defence guys !!!

@@vidyalaxmi466 The point being there was little advancement - especially with regard to gunpowder, cannons, and so on before the Mughals - war science has almost always lagged significantly behind in India. His view is an extremely negative realistic view. He rarely makes two bones about calling a spade a spade.

@Abhra Talukdar essentially yes. I agree.

@Devvrat Mishra science of weaponry, gunpowder, guns, artillery, tactics etc. Compare the Napoleonic wars to wars of the same time period in India. Huge deal of difference. This difference has stemmed from a long time ago.

Wasn't Tipu Sultan's rocketry better than the English?

what's musket?

@@krishnaGanesh10 gun

Muslims didn't win every war, you are over stating their successes and also there was no divide between Muslims and Hindus,a lot of Hindu Generals and Muslim Generals fought alongside to defeat their opponent which also composed of similar religious groups

@@krishnaGanesh10 see toradar

Is he Bengali or mix?

@@st.mephisto8564 mix,from Dad's side he is bongoli

Agreed. Several holes in the arguments.

Yeah, too smart by half. At this rate Mr Mitra will soon be in the category of an entertainer rather than a serious scholar. People should read Majid Khan's comments below debunking the assumptions and mistakes in this video.

@Devvrat Mishra I have a feeling that it will go to colonialism after that.

Horses are the biggest proofs of AIT

@@sarvathavicharsheel7487 In what manner, precisely? No anthropological evidence is indicative of any such thing.

@Devvrat Mishra my first comment was basically can we have a session based on the latest military tech and what is the equivalent of today’s cavalry(that we obsess over but not our strength) and today’s infantry(that we ignore but is simple enough to deter attacks )

@Devvrat Mishra makes sense , AIM has told before that we should rather go in for like the production of 400-500 Tejas , so that scale is achieved and also by sheer quantity we can win.

A source would be helpful.

@@sharmashivanand source kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nNdpmLeFqtqwcmQ.html

Hey, I'm new to this and haven't watched this video completely. Can you explain how is the channel right leaning and can you suggest some great videos on this channel which can inculcate some pride and positivity for India/Bharat (of course, without any non-researched hyper-nationalistic bias) ? You can also suggest some videos outside this channel which you found great regarding the aforementioned ?

Good that you brought this to attention. Please send an email to editors of any national paper, OpIndia and Republic expressing the situation at length. Post this on your social media, анонимност.

Haha

Sure tushar

@@AyushSingh-sy2lg arey aap yahan bhi 😅

@Ankita Sharma WTF is sheimp

@Ankita Sharma ha ha don't u know there is no such thing as gender or sex so if she is a simp than she is a simp there is no such thing as sheimp

@Ankita Sharma thanks Ankita. Wasn't aware my appreciation went to that level. But hey, ya learn something new every day 😝

@Ankita Sharma you've clearly confused me for Sanjukta Basu and Kushal for RaGa 😂😂

@Ankita Sharma How do u know that Pallavi is all over the channel and comments in every video. It only suggests only one thing u watched every video of this channel and read every comment. And by your description of kushal looks I think u are simping for kushal and just got jealous on Pallavi.

Would definitely pay for that!