total fake news

And the ATACMS are being replaced with the new generation. Likewise, the HIMARS are from the 1990's.

Many of the weapons are from the 1990's. The new generation of weapons will replace these.

And no extra launchers, I gather. Just the missiles themselves. And do we have any idea how many?

They are Top Secret strategic weapons. That's what Hamish says. 😂😂😂

Probably got through most of the older stuff now

Last that i heard Netherlands, Norway and Denmark are donating there old F-16 and that is not small number i read from somewhere that we are speaking of ovet 60 planes in total.

@@ospehu1 "Read from somewhere" Yeah, this has been known for about a year now. Its not some great mystery or recent revelation :p

@@AlexAnteroLammikko OK, so you know how many? Or do you need to read it somewhere?

F16’s are on the way, pilots and technicians are being trained right now. Operational ETA somewhere this summer, it just takes some time.

Send in ue wunderwaffen

Agreed

Gas in Europe again? Will EU accept this?

Yes. This is a very frustrating subject. Usually america says its crossing a red line. But nobody says that no more. We should send f35 with pilots to protect ukranian skies.

@@UpRisingDown They’re already getting over 140 jets this year comrade. I think that’s a good start

@@steve-real yes. Well i have my doubts on how effective they will be against russia. Only time will tell us. We had high hopes on western tanks. That didnt give any results at all.

Your right- propaganda and projection, their main arsenal.

Nobody plays fair in war. To quote Shakespeare: "all's fair in love and war".

I am not a Putin fan; however, NATO started this YEARS ago.

@@guylaurie819 Putin for sure lives up to that quote! If anyone ever did.

So you think Victoria Nuland spending 5 billion to ferment a coup in 2014 was playing Fair

Dude Russia use a minor amount of other country’s weapons lol Russia are making 100 tanks a month and more shells the all nato combined

Exactly.

@@shannonbertram5513yes 1 million shells from North Korea is nothing is it plus so what ? Russia is still getting stuff from abroad and it can only build these tanks as it’s managing to get chips from the west still by circumventing the embargo

​

Вы серьёзно ? На Украине давно ничего нет своего. Сказочник.

For what

As soon as they have personel to wear them on the front line.

Russian military also avoid it. built railway lines inland (they know about the childish 'media-victory' hunger of the ukies) anyways, if the bridge gets taken out it will mostly be a nuisance for civilian traffic. military supplies goes inland by rail

@@JK-dv3qepeople getting information from this propaganda outlet have no idea what’s actually going on. It’s a laughable joke to follow the information from the ground coming directly through telegram and then hearing “analysis” like this. Everything this sophist says is a lie.

Crimea will be in Ukraine hands this year.Putin will fall soon after.

Wouldn't hang around London bridge either if the kerch bridge is damaged mate...

They had to move a lot of junk to get at them. They are still mothballed in the Nevada desert.

@@Bird_McBride wishful thinking?

Pilots and technicians are being trained right now, eta somewhere this summer

Where are ze wunderwaffen

@@abbofun9022 Eventually they'll figure it all out and get the wiring correct. Takes time.

true. this should have been enough to grant Ukraine air support or even boots on the ground. enough with the condemnations and strong worded letters.

It's just CS,

And both sides have been using it.

There are no laws, just agreed on guide lines.

@@satanicmicrochipv5656 It’s still chemical warfare 🙄🤡 Which is a war crime…”just CS” GTFOH…they’ve been using more than just CS gas…

I'd say it's been since almost two years now. And yeah. Although. back in late 2022, ten to one meant 60.000 to 6.000. Now it is on average 5 to one at 10.000 to 2.000, just the hot zones see a 10 to one ratio.

Nope

no it has not... All last year it was 1:3 or 1:2... It´s only in the last 3-4 mouths ...

@@JesperSandgreen tbf, that was during the counteroffensive where Ukraine used stocks of reserves ammo and spent months attriting the enemy artillery.

The Ukraine had trouble finding men to fight. All the ultra nationalists are out of commission

Were you opposed to civilians being killed in the Donbass for 8 years ? May I suggest you're only opposed to the "wrong " kind of war .

@@markmanc-zw3td No, we are not opposed to that --- since it never happened.

@@markmanc-zw3td Do we remember the 2012 UEFA European Cup ... some matches were held in very peaceful Donetsk. Before 2014.

@@boink800 Remind us who was President at the time.

Propaganda This is what the they made up to start the war Then they said they would not invade Ukraine When they did invade they also said Ukraine started the war@@markmanc-zw3td

That should absolutely never happen, even though they could do it well, it would bring our boys into harm's way and potentially trigger completely unacceptable risks. I can say that the American public would absolutely never support our military fighting in Ukraine for any reason whatsoever. Support for this war and Ukraine here isn't high on anyone's list. They are not our responsibility or problem at all..

Replace "could" with "should." A NATO base on the peninsula would level the playing field.

USA dragged its feet over allowing F-15 into Ukraine and has done nothing** of note to train pilots or ground crew. ** that we know of. Why is this the case? USA would never try to fight as Ukraine has had to do.

@@elizabethstewart12 Just no. It should not cross the mind - full stop. The US AND Russia know full well, that the US would outright win - and that is an existential threat to Russia. That puts Nuclear response squarely on the table - so you can't risk direct conflict. You COULD put a trip wire in place, that would go "This is Ukraine, you may not take it. It's far enough away from the front, please consider ending this conflict" but, Russia may see that as a direct attack - so who knows what they would do, risky. What you CAN do, is send a whole lot of weapons. F16's, long range missiles, artillery batteries. You MIGHT be able to pave the way for US soldiers to volunteer to go on a tour of duty in Ukraine, under Ukrainian colours - but that gets messy really quickly. The reality is, in the state the US economy is, the struggles of average working Americans their is little stomach for providing ANY aid for Ukraine, let alone boots on the ground / in the sky. The only way you get real, sustained support is if the US government stops dicking around with helping illegal immigrants, stops it's uncontrolled spending, and starts deflationary monetary policy. But at this point it's going to be 4-5 years before things can turn around even if you do everything starting today.

@@jeffreygoodwin133 I agree with you. Especially since so many Ukrainians refuse to sign-up, and Ukraine still isn't viewed in the best light by many Americans

once the aids starts to flow in Russia wants to win this offensive before it happens they are starting to run short of the things they need

Oil refineries dont have air defences as standard

@@mrjerzheel but his Black Sea fleet do- now half sunk with the remainder running away.

@@mrjerzheel However Putins home does, which is further away from the front. Makes you wonder why..... Just stating the obvious.

be careful...Russia may then destroy that huge Ukrainian dam!

Russia has built a direct rail link so the bridge has become strategically pointless, it would be a propaganda victory though.

@@Dingdangdoo I mean. The railroad has quite a few bridges in zaporyzhzhya and donetsk oblast. Each not being easy to replace and within range of Ukr cruise missiles. People tends to forget that spicy little part.

Well, where do you want communists, on US soil or in Russia? You decide for yourself. I'm out.

What do you want? A cookie?

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Russia will never let any ground they take go back to Ukraine. Russia knows it can outlast Ukraine which is why they are happy with the current war of attrition.

For your information, Russia does have a legal right to Crimea. It's population is majority Russian.

Yea what a cute fairytale ending that will almost certainly not happen

Russia has already lost ground. It didn’t even have operational control over the areas Putin claims to have annexed.

The orc bots do not seem to like your comment 😂🤡 I do. MUGA!

Here lays a Hitlers Son War criminal.

How about HERE LIES THE WORST DICTATOR WHO EVER LIVED HATED BY THE HUMAN RACE!

"PUTAIN"....IS....DOOMED!!!! RUSSIA DELENDA EST! SLAVA UKRAÍNI!!!

The amount of denial on this channel is crazy.

@@diegoflores9237 The amount of Kremlin Cope Trolls on KZfaq is even crazier...

When Mr Putin or his successor realise that Russia has reached a point where it can't afford to wage a war in Ukraine it cannot win, and consequently the Russian army packs up and goes home there will be peace.

I always ask for whirled peas before I go off to war, when and where?

@@marktrotter8971there might no one left to enjoy the peace you’re proposing…

Russians don't have the word in their vocabulary...

yes but no Russians live in warsavw,but CRIMEA IS 90%RUSSIANS

Dividing Poland is a long-standing tradition in Europe. Perhaps in the future we will return to it.

He’s not an expert he’s just a guy from another town.

@@stu281 Get lost trolsky!

@@draganjagodic4056 what a clot 😂

ha ha as if😊

He is on Putins payroll silly boy

ATACMs haven't been top secret in >10 years. neither are their replacements

Shame on USA plotting to use Ukraine as canon fodder ! to fight Russia

You could say this any time on in the last 100+ years and it'd be true

The terrorist state of Russia has no shame

They have emphasized threatening Crimea taking it back entirely by military means? Yea idk about that

To make money on the cheap?

because its hard to find different clowns of this standard😂😂😂

@@user-kj5bf9rm9d that's simply not true. Hamish is a very experienced commander and well worth listening to for anyone who wants a genuine understanding. It's just that I don't need to listen to the same interview twice.

@@colmfarrell6687 experience tells him - lets waste more lives we might win and we have the moral high ground 😂😂😂 as if ! ! !

@@colmfarrell6687 Hamish may be a very experienced commander, nevertheless he is a yes man who has no option but to toe the line, because if he were to be truthful his political masters would destroy his reputation and career. Ukraine will never again rule its former eastern provinces or Crimea, and Zelenskyy is a dead man walking

slava ukraina from italy

Wow, what a zinger. You really did show it to that russian president. I bet he's going to cry himself to sleep tonight because of your comment.

@@Mr.Funnyman273 Poo-tin is terrorist and war criminal

He doesn't care, he has what he wants. If they want to throw themselves at Russian defences then let them.

Everyone knows that anyone who says "as an American" isn't American. But who would admit to being Russian?

​@@icu17siberiaI don't know,he mentioned Pikachu and that's pretty American.

In reality, it won't matter that much. Ukraine do not want to be ruled by an autocrat. They want freedom. and no matter what the peoples choice will prevail. Sure he forced the Crimeans under his rule. But that will only matter for a while. The people will choose, and much to Putins dislike, they will not choose him.

If history taught us anything, Russia will also choose freedom in the future, just like most other modern countries.

@@brianrasmussen2956 Interesting. Thank you, Brian. My question, how do we know the future? If I observe the current Russian behavior, the social future is likely not that free.

Yes, as the police that use it on civilians to disperse them do not shoot the civilians after deploying it. Big difference.

@@bilko3249 u just made my point.War is a different situation..LOL...

Both sides have been documented using it

Silly jodys... The U.S. regularly uses Combat CS on it's own soldiers during peace time. Hooah.

There's no hypocrisy. Many things can be done by a government to civilians that you cannot do to a soldier. A soldier as a prisoner of war also has many rights. It is banned to us chemical weapons which is great. If not, then where will we draw the line and people will keep generating more chemical weapons types and chemicals!

You mean Putin? Yes Putin are living in a fantasy world.

Robot soldiers and systems for war are being developed

@@blueberry-ri7eb The Russians are already testing those.

Tbf, most of that was hype from the American press. I do recall some retired UK military brass ever so politely wondering aloud where all the hoopla was coming from as their Ukrainian sources were giving rather different info.

War is not exactly predictable

😂😂😂

Lol

@@diegoflores9237 Cope harder, Ivan.

The copium is off the charts.

​@@lesvampyres5429 Yes, everyone is coping with you being braindead.

@@lesvampyres5429Ukraine should take Moscow

I think, if you look carefully, the USAS has more or less given up on the deal. Shh. Don't tell anyone.

Then stop all funding to Israel.

Don't support NATO, then.

@@ConnorJane Are you complicit with Russia, an aggressor state that indiscriminately attacks civilians?

@@ConnorJane You seem to be Russian.

@@ConnorJane Please you do not support Russia

Why? 🤔

Why? so we all die.

Are you willing to go? Send your children and grandchildren? I'm guessing you'd be ok with other people's kids being sent into the meat grinder but not you and yours..

Go and join up then Rambo

True but WW1 artillery were smaller and basically firing while blindfolded, compared to modern artillery. Even the idea of a creeping barrage wasn't really used at the time except for a couple of battles.

@@Jagonath Vimy is where the creeping barrage was perfected. Also there were WW1 shells easily larger than today's shells. They were also getting targeting information from planes, wasn't by radio so not like today. My point is the volume which is incomparable when they implied it was comparable. If you want worse try Verdun.

Define "sovereign" and why it means you can't invade a territory which claims to be it.

And then you woke up in your own cope.

Europe should have responded to the aggression in 2014, we wouldn't be here now

@@icu17siberia Totally agree. What a huge mistake. Likewise, Germany's contracts and new pipelines with Russia, that enriched Russia and made Russia feel the West only wanted riches and would not deter him.

@@icu17siberia No. Probably Putin would have stepped up his actions and it would all be over - with Crimea and Eastern Ukraine returned permanently to Russia, where they belong.

The Moskva is sleeping with the fishes, so that is a start.

I agree. The Russian wartime economy will be tanking. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aq6YqKR9rdHdZ4k.html

How?

@@dalecrocker3213 The new ATACMS, F-16s more HIMARS, more artillery, more precision guided weapons. Keep up.

@@lesvampyres5429 So the plan is to constantly bombard areas occupied by the Russians, is it? So what do you do when you run out of ammo and the Russians come back?

@@lesvampyres5429 So your plan is to constantly bombard empty territory then? Seems an expensive way of going about things.

Agreed. It will be Ukrainian veterans that will be advising and training western troops in the near future. Definitely part of a fair exchange for the magnificent weapon systems western countries are supplying to Ukraine in their struggle.

@@dlmsarge8329nope

Think so? 🤣

His fall will be catastrophic

You mean his multi billion dollar gigantic palace on the black sea, all paid for by the destitute Russian public🤣🤣🤣🤣 If so, then let's hope....

@@user-kb1ui4vj9y See into the future can you?🤣

Zelelensky and Poroshenko are at risk, they have been put on Russia's most wanted list.

The Bradley is being phased out of frontline units

Who said those stories are true?

@@michaellitten4538 history.

You watch movies as if they are a documentary?

@@petroleumalley its history.

@@billybunter5575 Sure. Only 300

The Russians did run away from Kherson City -- which was going to be "Russia Forever". Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha

Not true Travis

@@dorothymoxham7520 You're clearly talking about the Russian retreat from Afghanistan.

If Ukraine had abided by the Minsk Agreement and not bombarded and tortured ethnic Russians in the Donbass when Russian asked them to, Russia wouldn't have invaded.

@@sakkra93 And just why did not Russia abide by the 1994 Budapest Memorandum which it signed?

And no one of the comedians is laughing at their own jokes. That's very high class.

Who's shill are you? Russian or China?

⁠@@MarkBush-en5czand what about you? Who’s shill are you?

If you take out the bridge, all traffic in and out of Crimea, to be done safely has to go either over land, or via ferry. Ferries can be hit by naval drones easily, and anything going over land can be hit by shorter range missiles. Beyond this, if you hit the bridge periodically, you force a massive and disproportionate amount of air defences to be positioned around that bridge, do to the importance of it for getting munitions, fuel, and so on into Crimea. And with long range missiles - you don't necessarily need jets at all to strike and deal with the bridge.

@@formes2388it seems you have no idea what you are talking about. 😄Whether Russia uses the Crimea route or land route they eventually need to pass the same route to reach deep inside Ukraine. So if Ukraine wants and has ability to hit Russian logistics movment they can do it already regardless of which route Russia is using. And if Russia wants to use ferry they can use sea of azov which Ukraine has no acess to it . Crimea is close to Kherson and Odesa, destroying it only can affect how fast Russia send equipmnent in this direction. However, Russian can uses the Rostov -Mariupol direction with the same efficiency because they have made a rail line from that direction too. And rail lines are the main way of transporting equipments and personal. In any case, Ukraine is on the west side Dnipro River. So they are closer to Crimea than Mariupol. At least take the time to have a look at to map to see how many KM land borders exist between Russia and Ukraine. In addition, the direction of Kharkiv which everybody says is the Russian target for the summer offensive is from Belgrad, not Crimea. And Russian now advancing there and Crimea is not at all a logistic hub for them at the given point they are fighting now . There is no attamp by Russian at the time for moving in direction of Kherson at all. I guess it will be easier even if they come from back to Kherson rsther trying to pass Dnipro at Kherson region. Russian only using River as a natural barrir to keep Ukranian away from east part and Crimea .Theswepeoole apearently dreaming a Ukranian offensive simmilar to previous summer offensive . It is the only time that the bridge may come handy for Russian against Ukraine. Yet moving through Dnipro river will be veey difficult logistically. So it is simply a dream as it was previous time and every time Ukriane tried to keep a foot hold other side of Dnipro. It is exactly why Russian pulled back from Kherson becuase the topography make it very difficult to provide that regions logistically .

Obviously too complicated for you

bot bot bot.... desperate now?

Low effort, low energy vatnik comment. No daily potato for you today, the Kremlin expects more effort from you before you get your potato wages.

Deluded.

@@wickwicker8575 we will all laugh when Swan lake plays again and they are all trapped hahaha

YES, you are so right.

Too bad sp sad. Not really but it what you get when you sell your country to the West.