When I saw the movie right after watching the first film, it looked like he didn’t age a day considering the film came out 20 years later

I call it the Dorian Grey Pact

I believe they use make out to make him look older 20 years ago and now he looks his age. But

@@TrickyPJM752 It's because he isn't much older than Jeff Goldblum in real life. In in the original movie they used makeup to make him look older than what he was.

he is in the new HIGHLANDER ?

In the words of my people, UP YOURSSSSSSS

You see his name on the rebuilt Washington monument at the beginning that’s it though,what sticks out for me is when they shoot the alien at Area 51 Whitmore says they are travelling planet to planet there whole civilisation,how could they then have an even bigger ship just sitting around with the queen in surely she would have taken her ship the first time round and attacked earth? Also seems like they had different priorities,first film was natural resources second film they wanted the earths core but they also lead us to believe one ship landed and went after the earths core but surely that kind of info would have been relayed in the first film when attacking the mother ship?

@@Makeitso2023 Well they don't necessarily need all the resources in the balance that occurs naturally. The smaller ships may go for genetic material and maybe some other near surface resources such as gems and crystals. Maybe even the large block of super clear ice in Antarctica could be valuable and hard to artificially synthesise. The volume of a core is vastly larger than the volume of the crust, so you probably don't need to rip the core out of every planet you visit. There is no point sending enough equipment to do so if you are just going to strip a couple of km of the surface. Alternatively the first ships could be sent to do prep work, or determine whether it is even worth going to a particular site. The ship drilling could have been a pilot/sampling drill, rather than harvesting in earnest. Before committing a harvester to the planet they might want to make sure that the core consists of what they expect and there are not likely to be any technical hiccups. They then decided to send a harvester to deal with humans before they became more of a threat, hence the change of priorities. If they went to the effort of sending a harvester anyway they might as do the core. As for whether the information would have been available in the first film? It is very plausible that it would not be. Fog of war and all that. Not inconceivable that a pilot grunt did not 100% grasp how their resource harvesting worked, and even if they did the glimpse into their mind may not have been clear on the details. Not going to lie, that seemed like one of the more reasonable parts of the plot!

The actor got blacklisted for some reason.

@@Makeitso2023I think the first time the Harvesters came they maybe planned to strip the surface of resources slowly after killing us off to ensure no resources were lost or wasted. The first time they came they thought we were primitive so they didn’t think of going all out. However after we beat them the first time they realized we were a threat so they scrapped the plan to slowly strip-mine Earth and just went full force “blow the damn planet up and harvest what’s left afterwards” even though that risked the destruction of some potential resources.

I wish they incorporated more of the soundtracks from the first film, that definitely would’ve made the film a little bit better

You can tell which celebrities spend their wages on liquor

Yeah you like that?? That's how they get you - with nostalgia bait. This film is an abomination of a creation. Should never have been made.

@@w33btrash69 I know it is, I just choose to enjoy the small moments of an abhorrent film

Can y’all stop crapping on this film? It was made as a dumb summer disaster blockbuster, and that’s what we got. I personally think this movie is almost as good as the original Independence Day

@@TrickyPJM752 "Can y’all stop crapping on this film?" No. "this movie is almost as good as the original Independence Day" No.

Yeah, the bomb that powerful would vaporize an entire ship into atoms, luckily, the Queen is still alive thanks to her personal shields.

@@TrickyPJM752 The reason why people were disappointed by this is because the sequel missed many opportunities compared to the first one. The first movie is a homage to all classic B Movie alien invasion films and UFOlogy, while the sequel is bought nothing new to the table as it took any elements from pop culture sci-fi literatures, such as Star Wars, Star Trek, Destiny, Halo, the Alien Franchise, and Starcraft.

@@DaRkLoRdZoRc You and @Jurassic Hero are just ignorant and are believing everything the internet told you about the movie. I bet you didn’t even watch it

He did however cause severe damage to the Queen’s personal shields. So what probably could have taken hours to take down, he gradually reduced the amount of power needed to destroy the shields.

@@logandexter931 and given how close the queen got to getting away with the sphere, its likely they would *not* have had hours to spare breaking that shield.

@@logandexter931cinematically speaking it’s meaningless. It’s like in Halo Reach when Jorge blows up the Covenant Supercarrier and then it’s replaced by an entire fleet.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mq2eosJ5tduYnqc.html

Still the best scene and line in the ENTIRE movie!! I only come back to watch this scene

@@plaguedoctor605 Jeff Goldblum and Bill Pullman were the best parts of this film

@@TrickyPJM752 oh most definitely, but you can't deny that that line was awesome!!

I really like the independence day resurgence when Mr Thomas Whitmore is to suicide. And his daughter is flying in the jet plane

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mq2eosJ5tduYnqc.html

Heduur-duur-durr! SoUNd CoOl DurR. You are the problem with why modern day films are fucking shit

thats why will smith didn't do it. He knew its a shit movie

@@NataliaYaremchuk0816no that was a "that movie sucked"

@@NataliaYaremchuk0816do you understand the difference between a shit movie and a nostalgic movie? It would still have been shit with him on it

@@NataliaYaremchuk0816whatever dude

Not really you need one to travel through space

This is the only best part

I'll give it a 8 out of 10. Because the script was a little bonkers and second it just felt lifeless without Will Smith.

@@jackraider1039yeah it wasn’t that bad but it’s just I didn’t like the atmosphere. I was expecting the atmosphere to not be like Star Wars but like the original film. The aliens 👽 always showing up didn’t give out that feeling of mystery or intimidation

@@Cyber-Lee_0007 It would have been a lot better if The script was stronger and more fateful to the original.

@@jackraider1039 agree

Yes you are, but don't worry about it... everyone's weird in some way. {:-)

⁠@@InternetGravediggerthanks man really gives me some self confidence.

The issue is that not all moviegoers go to movies for the escapism as you or I do. Some people want movies to reflect real life or to demonstrate some kind of message.

All right your opinion i guess

I personally thought the movie was very close to being as good as the first film, people only crap on this film just because critics didn’t like it

Am I weird for enjoying it ☹️

Lol

​@@brummyuk2151yeah the first one is more believable

Good point

People want escapist fun, but have become so embittered that they demand escapism be more in line with reality, which defeats the purpose of escapism.

Same with the first one

​@@KingDonaldFirstofhisnameno, the first one is more "realistic" and consistent

@@JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor "more realistic" for sure. But still not very realistic at all.

He doesn't even know where the Hell he is half the time!

And Cadet Bone Spurs would?