Agreed, they need to implement a Ground RB without CAS. That would bring in ALOT of more players.

I would like new maps except gaijin map designers are always on a schizo high.

Why the hell does the range scale on the scope even go to 6km??? When its mostly

@@Berilaco i basically never use range finder as mostly it is unnecessary at the maps...

@@Loplyful just spawn spaa LOL

t30 is post ww2-

​@@user-sg9ql8nk1uIndeed, but it was started DURING ww2

@@user-sg9ql8nk1u Is it not a “WW2 design” as I originally said? Before even editing it… Like, reading is fundamental, your generation failed at such…

@@FlatBread1 That’s my thing, I clearly had “designed” before I even edited my comment. I edited it because it had “flint” instead of “fin”. I’m tired of me having to suffer the consequences because others cannot READ. Ugh, ANNOYING ASF. Everyone wants to have such a moment they jump on everything.

@@BARelement mf u said ww2 american heavy tank not ww2 *designed* american heavy tank,that shit only appear after ww2 how would i know ffs

“Bro hit the Dart on the Composite” 💀

@@christopherchartier3017 nah gulag this man

Unless its early Soviet ones (fat ones fired by the 100 mm / 115 mm) all modern long rod APFSDS should shatter when ricocheting. The midsection of the rod is weakest to shearing.

also in general that applies to all AP rounds in one scale or the other, if you look at physics simulations youl quickly notice that basically all AP rounds lose their form/composition quickly while trying to dig into the armour with high tier apfsds rounds hitting something at an extreme angle should absolutely not cause it to bounce off but rather disindigrate aka shatter on impact with older full size AP rounds they also shouldnt just bounce from high angle plate like they currently do, but rather lose a significant amount of penetrating power due to deformation etc and then bounce off also i highly doubt warthunders representation of overmatching is at all realistic, a lot of the time light tanks and other thinly armoured but highly angled (bmp1 etc) can bounce full size 90-122mm etc rounds which simply shouldnt be possible due to overmatch in any case

@@chost-059 In regards to the last paragraph. It just depends on what round you're shooting at some of these light tanks APHE, APC, or even APCBC will of course over match, but a 90-120mm APFSDS round will of course fall into a smaller round its self due to he discarding sabot portion. The majority loose roughly 80% of their original width which would remove the overmatching feature.

The Abrams looking less fucked up IRL in that case. Giant shoot me here shot trap gimps it hard in WT. I dont even play USA but the bruhms is bad.

@@illegalaryan823actually Abrams ufp over-performs by bouncing rounds it shouldnt but the turret ring thing screws it up. Gaijin could just make the turret ring thicker and it’d fix the Abrams

@@illegalaryan823 the abrams is good

Not in warthunder, not compared with the T80 and Leo2, its an easy kill with no error, no what the fuck moments like with the T80s ERA eating shots or the Leo2 bouncing with turret wiggles @@undulato

@@illegalaryan823 its good if the player is good, good thermals, second best shell at toptier, 5 second reload, still somewhat survivable, really good mobility, really sounds like a skill issue if your bad in it

Because it is what the rounds do AFTER the armour is what is the problem, not the armour. a 25mm dart does more damage than a full sized 75mm shell AFTER the armour in warthunder, which is just stupid.

projectile is definetly poorly modeled though

@@alkatraz9514 both are poorly modelled if you ask me like how a 2s38 can swallow a 105mm dart to its breach like a bird eating a worm, only damaging a periscope, or 5x 40mm darts point blank just lightly damaging a tanks barrel just doesn't clash well with my perception of physics. APFSDS to the face of ANY helicopter should kill it outright, I don't understand how you can fire, and terminally guide a hellfire after a solid tungsten dart goes from the nose through the gunner, pilot, transmission out past the tail and kills you, yet they still end up killing me post-death.... as if their EOIR sensor can run, and guide a weapon with everything in the back compartments being in 1000 smoldering pieces. Or my favorite, smack a t-series broadside with APFSDS, just to watch it travel though the entire carousel, melt the ammo, but doesn`t cook off and just turns to blast me in the face.... like wtf? ``consistently; inconsistent`` sums up this game pretty well.

the abrams is the most survivable tank at top tier. the Leopards only tank more shots because of their spall liners

when air superiority came out spalling was broken for a bit and then shortly fixed

problem is, low BR germany (like from panzer 4 f2 to King Tiger) absolutely dominates large open maps. The shermans or t-34s cant do anything at those ranges, which is why they implemented "semi urban" maps so that the german mains get to pick off the ocassional sherman conscript who just wanders into the open, but also gives a chance for smarter sherman players to take advantage of their stabilizers to get the first shot off in sudden urban encounters

Yeah, maybe something inbetween would be better, like a crossover between Ardennes and large Sinai. But yeah, Germany absolutely dominates, tho I just want a bit flatter maps where I don't have to expose my whole tank to shoot at enemy when playing USSR, like on Ardennes where over 99% of inclines a T-34 has to drive over them completly while Panther gets a perfect hull down.

Yes. I served with the Ukrainian contingent in Kosovo

honestly you sound like a bozo so just sit down and cope this is coming from a pc player to ;)