Every time they made changes to rounds they made them worse, aphe is fine and it doesnt need more "realism", rounds in this game dont even have inertion and weight how are they supposed to be realistic at all?
@user-yn1gd7wn3w13 сағат бұрын
This extremely Positive for WarThunder - HOWEVER: Unfortunately its highly unlikely to be passed on a Popular vote. Fundamentally it Balances amazingly, However due to a Majority of players playing APHE rich nations (USSR, Germany, US) It has little to no chance to be passed. People are only inclined to do what immediately benefits them, Not what is good for the benefit of all players and the game.
@rubotok370310 сағат бұрын
i agree completely, and i wish more people understood... most russian and germany and american mains i complain to keep speaking of cupola weak points, weakpoints I've never really used cause i play nations with AP focus... I don't see why they rely so heavily on single weakpoints and their HE one pen knockout
@Guardrailkid13 сағат бұрын
as an aphe lover, honestly i can see this being better for the game as much i love absolutely nuking the interior of the tank, i think aphe acting as ap would've made more sense
@SchitzoNewsNetwork-wu7zd13 сағат бұрын
You have a game thats banning thousands of hackers and bots every few months but they act like its impossible to bot the vote, the chinese admit they bot the game aswell which is wild. I think the devs just want votes that end in predictable ways that benefit them but even then the last 30 years have show n game communities are not fit to decide the future of the game. It never works well because you can't expect morons to understand big pictures. I mean just playing the game shows me most players are morons and assholes. The change would be good but just like everything else the masses of morons are going to stop it from happening. I'm not even sure why but its probably a combination of the chinese hackers, russians being barbaric animals, and selfish people who would prefer to keep GB down.
@dionisisndini736613 сағат бұрын
Tiger and jumbo battle are going to last forever
@warthunderclipper36 минут бұрын
Nope, unless they are both hull down
@machinech18314 сағат бұрын
Right, so... the poll is for testing the changes. So much for reading comprehension or even bothering given how many people think the poll is for implementation. Though given Gaijin's track record I can understand those that figure they'll just throw it in anyhow. Then there's the crowd that like what amounts to cheap shots and I can see both sides of that argument having points. It'll mean another shake up to balance making some tanks better defensively and others weaker. I ultimately think it'll be a solid change to the game but it'll take some time to get things dialed in.
@aidenzerkle867214 сағат бұрын
i would like this because it means i wont just get one shot every time i peek a corner or come barreling arround a corner and somehow get sniped before i can finish the job
@FirstDagger15 сағат бұрын
2:49 Stop spreading this misinfo, the vote is on whether the test should be run, not whether it will be implemented.
@Orodreth88815 сағат бұрын
Looks like they don't want to test or change anyway. No is in the lead.
@chrisg609115 сағат бұрын
Newbies : hmm, that’s interesting… Veterans: After almost a decade the developers still can’t figure out how to realistically model a tank shell? Seriously??
@FirstDagger15 сағат бұрын
People with a brain: Oh cool Gaijin is implementing something no other game has and are making this game more realistic than ever.
@drivixl626015 сағат бұрын
What a time to be a British main. I have to say, i quite like these changes
@bean_up740216 сағат бұрын
i also voted no
@kingtigertheheavy270816 сағат бұрын
No wonder why coupula shots don't work anymore
@cjkuromorimine461116 сағат бұрын
I think this might actually be a good thing for the game. Sure us Sherman players might have a tougher time killing the tigers, but it's still a challenge I'm up for. It's just ridiculous on how Tigers can easily be killed, now it will feel like a challenge. Though I would appreciate it they fix solid shot and every other round they decided to nurf into the ground, APCR is basically unusable unless you know where the ammo is, and only then you need to take a few good shots at it before it detonates
@O_O_F12 сағат бұрын
Tiger players shouldnt be fucking boss fights, they can angle and our only way is the cupola.
@rubotok370310 сағат бұрын
@@O_O_F or their cannon, or their tracks, or you could just reposition
@cheznugget23 сағат бұрын
It's a 2 stage vote which people don't seem to understand first vote is 'Voting to Test our Proposed APHE Shell Change' Test key word the second vote after that 'If you’re interested in testing, we’ll start preparing it and will host another voting on this change based on its results' second vote is where we vote no or yes if it's added into the game
@Dragno19114 сағат бұрын
2:44 says 'want these changes' and 'there will be a test server' I see why people who only view youtube videos think this is guaranteed. Which is not. Sad this vote is gonna be no for a god damn test. War thunder youtubers are the voice of the large number of the community. And when they publish videos which are wrong. Everything goes to hell which is sad. They need to actually read and publish videos which are true.
@doublesoul862Күн бұрын
I love how people want changes to the game but the moment they have a chance to vote to even test such changes they get cold feet because oh no, that affects my playstyle and isn't just a buff
@SteelxWolfКүн бұрын
Well most people dont even realize they are voting on the shrapnel change, not the shell penetration part. Also Gaijin “tested” fox3s and added them only a few months later with little change. Cant test something and then shove it in the game anyway
@Sh4quille0atmeal16 сағат бұрын
@@SteelxWolf nah they probably just read "change" "yes" "no" and pressed "no"
@midnitejmpr9429Күн бұрын
The part that’s going to buff APHE is voting NO on this change. We are only voting on how the damage cone is. What they are doing THAT WE HAVE NO CHOICE ON is increasing the penetration of the AP part of the shell and increasing the amount of secondary shrapnel from the HE part of the shell. We are basically voting yes or no on the balancing factor of this new APHE change.
@cheznugget23 сағат бұрын
The vote is 'Voting to Test our Proposed APHE Shell Changes' It's to test it a second vote happens after and weather it's added is chosen from there 'If you’re interested in testing, we’ll start preparing it and will host another voting on this change based on its results'
@midnitejmpr942922 сағат бұрын
@@cheznugget that’s the thing, almost everyone is already wanting to say no to this change. That’s what I’m getting at.
@cheznugget21 сағат бұрын
@@midnitejmpr9429 ight
@machinech18314 сағат бұрын
The amount of people who can't comprehend what the vote is for is astounding.
@BARelementКүн бұрын
Not an across the board “nerf”, that would indicate that the Tiger I and its PzGr, and the IS-2s 122mm shells wouldn’t be more powerful after this change. The tip will remain intact, keeping its damage continuing, while still exploding and over-pressuring. Some shells it’s a buff. Some shells it’s a nerf. Even then, depending on the situation. Some shells on some impacts don’t go deep enough to do damage, therefore that’s a buff in that scenario. Other times like shooting copulas won’t kill the entire tank obviously. That would be a nerf on that scenario.
@user-jc2in3cp3gКүн бұрын
i voted no
@Iden_in_the_RainКүн бұрын
I mean it’d be good for APHE to be more realistic, with the only major thing needed being the rebalancing of some low tier tanks’ BRs. Separately, buffing AP, APCR, APDS, etc. would be good as well.
@johnroscoe2406Күн бұрын
So some content creators are saying it's getting buffed And others saying nerfed
@semicooperative7188Күн бұрын
@@johnroscoe2406 its definitely a nerf. The increased frontal cone is nowhere near enough considering how much lateral damage it loses
@johnroscoe2406Күн бұрын
@@semicooperative7188 Yeah, I think you and the rest saying it's a nerf are more likely correct here than the others. Also cool channel, think I'll sub.
@BARelementКүн бұрын
Well that’s content creators. Gotta put out that narrative. For some it’s a buff, some it’s a nerf. Considering overpressure, and HE loads. In some scenarios like the HV 57mm & 75mm they will be benefiting from this as their explosives aren’t enough to do much anyway. Might aswell still carry the damage throughout the tank reaching the turret crew. Let’s be lucky the Dev Team didn’t model turret baskets along with this change, and not changing BRs. This like many things is nuanced. Not a black and white “buff, no nerf” scenario. It’s a massive shuffle up. As far as the 122mm, 130mm, 155mm, 8.8cm L56, and guns alike? They’ll just overpressure anyway.
@Person4772Күн бұрын
@@semicooperative7188 Ah, but the cap being like solid shot will mean that APHE can now cover the edge cases that Solid-Shot was good for. namely going through Fuel tanks and Engines, like on the IS 1/2. without a nerf to its spall pattern it will essentially be made into the perfect shell, with the benefits of both Solid AP and APHE. the only case where solid AP would be superior would be shooting through things like crates/sheds that would normally detonate an APHE shell. but those are few and far between as-is.
@SteelxWolfКүн бұрын
@@BARelementim curious which CCs are saying its a buff?
@WuNdErWaFeN5 күн бұрын
As you kinda said in video ther is no definite russian bias that completly destroys the game. There are just few slightly fauvorable things like battle rating, modeling etc that make russian tanks slightly better than they would perform in real life, but as i said it does not destroys the game, it just makes it more enjoyable to average wt consumer to play as legendary t-34 and not being sniped by panther from 2 kms as it normaly happened in real life(i do not mean the abomimations of a crewman of panther d that charged straight forward to soviet lines in kursk, but rather later use of panthers as just great tanks to kill soviet t 34 in great distances(it also should be noted that soviets had much more tanks than their opponents in general si it makes sense that their mass produced good weapons are statisticly worse than few perfect weapons their counterparts have))saying that i believe that few not all rusian tanks perform better than they should and i understand that its frustrating for other nations that have to deal with them. What are your opinions share them so i could see your point of view.
@Metagross5558 күн бұрын
Yes
@doublesoul8628 күн бұрын
We don't talk about that wiesel engagement
@christiangreco17448 күн бұрын
a true baguette slinger
@Milobaby.10 күн бұрын
hi can u do a console controls settings guide love the videos ❤
@semicooperative718810 күн бұрын
@@Milobaby. I'll look into it, but my settings are very weird, so I'm not sure how helpful it would be
@Milobaby.10 күн бұрын
@@semicooperative7188 honestly I need help with flying controls
@__SCALES__10 күн бұрын
Great vid I needed to know this
@ANukeWithLegs11 күн бұрын
>danke bitte shoes >also console peasant why are you even trying ? You are cringe and your videos have no content you just yap for 10s of minutes without any actual information