You forgot What If..?

Kinda bummed you didnt include What If??? But I guess you didn't like it.

@@liamphibia Tbf What If is kinda irrelevant to phase 4. It just came out within its duration

you could at least comment here what you think about What If..?

Why would Sam need to get a lone?

Agreed Phase 4 should have been an epilogue of Endgame .

Yea, most of phase 4 seemed like endgame never happened

@@jturner2577 and yet I thought that’s what the shows were going to be more focused on. Falcon and the Winter solider is the only example I could come up with because they actually dealt with the result of the 5year gap and it’s effects on ppl and the world.

@@Nytellem Sure the way they dealt with it was too hamfisted in some aspects. But at least it was actually dealt with and not danced around/downplayed.

Love and Thunder literally had an ice cream place called Infinity Conez like bruhhh

1000% THIS

Yet Marvel finds it a Red Flag for some reason.

@J Turner I know it's a shame, they're delusional

@@jturner2577 red flag = anything that won't be a shallow cash grab

Love of thunder. For example what a source material used right namor too

Disney didn't come in, Michael Waldron is a selfish dumbass similar to Rian Johnson and admitted he wanted to play with the toy ALONE

She's obviously not gonna stay there but yeah, it should've been better

That's what I was hoping for. It made the most sense. The MCU has been severely lacking in the female baddie category. Why would Disney give a rats ass? Where did you hear about their interference?

? Disney had nothing to do with it. The writer, Michael Waldron decided he didn't want to "tee up the coolest villain of all time for someone else to play with" (his words) and decided to straight up make her the villain instead

MoM is one of the MCU’s worst scripts lol. I was baffled at some of the choices. Memory Lane aka The Exposition Store was egregiously lazy writing.

yeah, altough all these movies/shows had an atrocious pace, spider-man, shang chi and loki at least had decent plots, UNLIKE ALL the rest of phase 4 productions

It’s kinda sad that Eternals arguably had the best pacing when compared to the rest of phase 4 movies. You didn’t feel like you were overwhelmed with so much in such little time

Their 6 part show is the problem, imagine thr show just have 6 eps and still add filler, look at moon knight falcon and hawkeyes, ep 2 through 5 feel empty

@@melodieluanepaula moon knight was good besides episode 6's fight between ammit and khonshu

Spider-Mans pacing was great

After black panther. Seems like that's back. Cautiously tho.

@@eegernades Yes I think they needed more time and phase 5 they probably woke up and realized they needed time to actually do good

The disappointment with MCU Phase 4 is why I want to refund Destiny 2 Lightfall.

When en have 6 movies for phase 1 and 2 and then there was 12 for phases 3 and now like fucking 20 and a million shows.

Wdym am excited for ant man,guardians of galaxy and am excited what will happen with dr strange . You are a bot or dont watch these movies

If they dont do many movies,then the story will not continue very fast,its better like that

@@kevink1396 lol no it isn’t they’re releasing shitty projects because they rush them smh

💯💯💯 I don't watch any of Wandavision cause I don't want spend my money on Disney Plus, then when I watch Dr. Strange 2 on theater I felt like I'm missing some of Wanda's plot and just like "did I have to start to watch gazillion episode of MCU series on Disney+ going forward now?"

I honestly don’t enjoy the fact that we have shows. I miss just needing to watch 2 hour movies. not shows that are excruciating to watch because they’re not paced right per episode

@@bobbywrtm yes, you do. WandaVision, Falcon and the Winter Soldier, moonknight, she hulk, and Ms marvel are all going to matter in the greater MCU narrative.

I am not too worried of daredevil born again because it’s confirmed that it’s MA rating.

God, I feel that. I used to be excited for every new installment of the MCU. Wanted new characters to get their chance to shine. Now? I'm afraid of every movie that comes out. I fear all they'll do is ruin the characters or make the film have a political agenda. X-Men and Fantastic 4 are coming soon. Adam Warlock, and perhaps Silver Surfer too. And I'm not excited. I'm terrified. Watching Disney do this to people's childhoods, it's infuriating. I know these characters are not my own. I know I don't own Marvel or DC or Star Wars. But I consume it. Shouldn't a fan have a say in how it's portrayed? Ticket sales and reviews should be the measure of a film or character's success, not identity politics. The film or comic or whatever should live or die by the sword of the audience. I don't know man. Just feels like we're all just kids on the playground, letting the bully play with our toys, only for him to break them.

With iger coming back I'm pretty worried about the deadpool 3 project and whether they'll go back to pg-13. Already worried they'll ruin hugh Jackman wolverine and now there's chance they'll take deadpool down with him

@@Blue-Apple-fc9eo MA rating doesn't mean shit writing wise it can be garbage

Luke Cage was about 7 episodes too many. It was a slog to get through at times.

Context for the scene?

@@laserbeamlightning yeah I’m curious about the context for that seen as well. Seems so random.

I just went searching for this scene and Ohmygod does it provide so much more depth for his character. I have no idea why they wouldn’t include it

@@laserbeamlightning ​ @QueenKunta I've never read very many Hawkeye comics so I could be VERY wrong here but iirc in a lot of comic stories Clint loses his hearing due to the physical abuse he gets from his parents

Exactly. As much as I disagree with the woke narrative, I would honestly despise a equally ham fisted conservative propaganda piece in my Marvel content. If you're gonna go political or make social commentary, make it subtle, don't make it the driving force of the plot. People always say, "comics were never political." And idiots that defend the wokeness respond with, "they always were." Funnily enough, the idiots are right. But only to a degree. Comics were always political, but not every comic was propaganda. Some comics can do political or social themes using metaphors brilliantly. But the majority of comics now don't focus on being subtle or intelligent with their message, it's blatant, and written out word for word. There's a definite difference between propaganda comics and political comics.

Woke characters? Could you elaborate? Because it seems to me that people of different colors need a legitimate reason to exist in media properties these days and if their character sucks, it's not because of the writing department but it becomes a "political" issue

@@blueNyellow I mean Andor the show isn’t really subtle of its leftist politics so your argument falls apart.

You don’t speak for everyone because I hate wokeness in entertainment. I don’t come to play your game, watch your movie, and tv show to watch politics. I came to be entertained. When a game adds a pride emblem, I roll my eyes. It doesn’t belong in a video game. When I watch a movie and they’re clearly pushing a woke agenda, I can’t stand it. Leave politics out of entertainment.

@@blueNyellowI think I kind of agree with you, I hate wokeness in entertainment. leftist politics shouldn’t be in it, and neither should conservative politics. I want entertainment to have little to none real life politics injected into it.

That's only good phase 4 and also loki and moon knight

@@ioniiKxFreeZeX moonknight was kinda meh it was a messed up storyline and never really made sense in so many ways

@@tvtaughtmethismess Moon Knight started off great, but fell off the rails very quickly.

Wdym developed ? 👀👀

my hot take: spiderman nwh is the worst phase 4 movie

Not enough people have this take. I think they may have also hurt streaming in general. Most people don’t keep services now just switch around depending on what show to see. They already own hulu… just put them there

Yeah, it was more profitable the old ways but now everyone is losing money since no one wants all the subscriptions especially for what they’re getting at the price point.

Honestly the only reason I even watched some Disney+ stuff is because my sister pays for it and I pay for HBO Max (Where I actually use it compared to Disney+)

Exactlyyy I truly believe Disney is the reason behind all this mess, the MCU remained undefeated before this (a thing or two that could’ve been better but it still had us all excited to see what was next)

Great now I need to have multiple streaming services to keep up with the story of the mcu… greattt…

Exactly! That's what attracts us to characters in the first place. We can relate, feel for them and take ourselves out of our own lives for a couple of hours and connect.

Phase 4 is a building arc only brain dead cabt simply see that

The problem with Wakanda Forever is for all intents and purposes, T'Challa already was gone. He was snapped out. All this mourning should have already happened

@@s4dd4d66 I mean I think it takes someone brain dead to look at this mess and see it as building towards anything, really.

@@darude2893 incorrect he was snapped back into existence meaning any mourning would've been recalled and then he ACTUALLY died making it way worse

I always thought that it being Strange's fault was just an incident that was incorrectly blamed on Strange when the real reason The multiverse broke open was due to the events of Loki. it would make far more sense and it wouldn't make Dr Strange look stupid, careless or too powerful to the point he can literally destroy all of reality with just a spell. I was hoping the Loki ending would continue on in Dr Strange 2. The fact Dr Strange 2 did nothing to move the multiverse storyline forward really ruined the hype for me.

@@vice2versa yes I agree, Multiverse of Madness was a conplete bait and switch movie that didn't live up to half of the hype that people had.

Yeah I get this. Loki, Far From Home, and Multiverse of Madness were all about the multiverse but none of them had any connection at all. In Loki we are lead to believe we are watching the "creation" of the multiverse, because before that there was only 1 sacred timeline. Then in Spider-Man, strange just randomly happens to know that the multiverse exists out of nowhere. This isn't explained. Then the memory spell is used a plot device (the reasons for that being cast and it going wrong are incredibly stupid). Then in MoM, a kid who has the power to travel the multiverse is introduced out of nowhere and used as a convenient plot device. What happened to the interconnectivity?

I heard people saying “Loki is going to show the tinkering of the multiverse, Spider-Man is going to show the effects of the multiverse’s tinkering, and Doctor Strange 2 will be about restoring.” So then why do none of them feel like they’re connected in anyway. I know Chavez was supposed to appear In Spider-Man NWH because Doctor Strange 2 was supposed to come out first, but NWH feels like a footnote in DS2. It’s kinda silly how the films in phase 4 that are supposed to set up the multiverse don’t have any correlation to one another.

@@tank_0251 The multiverse always existed though so of course Strange would know about it. You're viewing things in a linear way which could explain your confusion. The Loki ending was the birth of the multiverse but that doesn't happen at a fixed point in time.

A lot of people these days sit on one extreme or the other. It's just sad tbh.

@@movieoverload I just liked knowing that I wasn't the only one that enjoyed Shang Chi

Definitely the reviewer that I've felt most similar to in terms of opinions. Others lean a bit too much into hating or loving it.

IMO Endgame was pretty bad. Although there were things I enjoyed like Tony's and Nebula's arcs , a lot of it left me disappointed: 1. Introducing time travel so late into the series shattered the already fragile MCU worldbuilding. Why worry about anything if time travel is this accessible? 2. I get the thematic beauty of Steve learning to live the life, but its execution ruined the idea. 3. Thor's trilogy arc was thrown away. 4. Hulk didn't even have character development. 5. Thanos was botched plain and simple. 6. The awkward "female power" scene. 7. The overall nonsense during the final fight.

​@@tentonmotto6779 Tbh the rest I don't care about opinion is an opinion but what do you mean Thanos was botched? I really am hoping you don't mean comic Thanos and you have some sort of reasoning

@@irishhotshot6765 I liked Thanos in the IW movie. He had personality, motivation, relationships, complexity and development. The Endgame throw that away. The interesting character was killed and replaced with a one-dimensional version.

⁠@@gumzsterterrible take and statement smh. Endgame was phenomenal. Literally the best MCU movie alongside infinity war. Why are you trying to be so different lmao. I don’t understand the amount of pretentious comments stating it should’ve ended with infinity war at all.

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@tentonmotto6779 your reasons as to why endgame is “bad” aren’t valid at all. Time travel was possible during that time because of Scott Lang, the quantum realm and the overall timing with Thanos defeating the avengers after infinity war. The way time travel was discovered was natural. This whole “fragile world building” comment is nonsense. When was it fragile in phase 1-3? Steve Rogers literally had the perfect ending to his arc so saying it wasn’t “executed” right is nonsense. Please explain. “Thors trilogy is thrown away” - again please explain. You’re making ridiculous stuff up. Endgame didn’t ruin Thor. “Hulk didn’t have character development” - unless your referring to the off screen development which admittedly is a flaw, smart hulk was still a decent character that was important to the plot of endgame and had good moments as well. Finally how was Thanos botched? Care to explain? And there wasn’t “nonsense” during the final fight at all. The third act is literally a peak payoff for the MCU. Endgame was one of the best MCU films alongside infinity war so what you have just said comes off as incredibly ignorant and pretentious.

phase 4 did seem like it was building up to something but Doctor Strange 2 kinda ruined that momentum. now everything feels like a lack of focus.

@@vice2versa the fact that Loki Spider-Man NWH and Doctor Strange 2 are the only projects in phase 4 that focus on the multiverse makes you think that they’re going to be the hitters of Phase 4. The way the events of each film could play off each other and the leads in each of those by the end of this pseudo-trilogy realizing the big threat looming over and putting the multiverse in danger, Kang. I’ve seen people saying the Loki is the start of the multiverse falling apart, Spider-Man NWH was to show the effects of the multiverse breaking, and Doctor Strange 2 would be about restoring, or at least trying to restore, the multiverse. So then why do these films barely have anything to do with one another? NWH is basically a footnote in Doctor Strange 2 and the events of Loki, which take place in an alternate timeline after the first avengers film, are completely unmentioned.

amazing that the phase with the most projects has the least amount of interconnectivity.

I agree, I get they were trying to set up new characters but Phase 1 did the exact same thing and still had a way to bind them together, I think the issue is that S.H.E.I.L.D was taken down with them they had glue for the characters in Phase 1 to interact but they could've set up and used S.W.0.R.D in the same way or the Sokovia accords(which I know have been repealed now but they could've not). Using Wanda as a big threat (like Loki), a character we know that was established as a villain in M0M and then taken down by a big host of characters instead of some stupid building

I’m surprised it didn’t come across any of the writers that Sam, who was in the military, would definitely know what a ‘terrorist’ and that Karli and the Flagsmashers obviously fit the description.

@@SpiderManMCUniverse Antifa scum writing the scripts, the kind that never saw any of the real world, coming from entitled leftist families and living in a bubble of worthless colleges.

That line is what made me hate the show so dang much. How many people need to be murdered for Sam to realize that they were terrorists. Then he followed that line with "Do better" like how are they supposed to do better, the population just doubled after 5 years to move on from Thanos murder of half the population and the only advice he has is to do better.

Same here wasnt perfect but i enjoyed it.

black panther was way better than nwh

@@bananaking664 it was good, but not as great as NWH.

@@Q-lays was that supposed to be an insult ☠️

Spiderman lack of action.

Which is also why criticism is important

I desperately wanted to like She Hulk. Really, I did. I tried to watch it and the more episodes I watched, the more it dragged on. It was unfunny and predictable.

They didn't need to have a powerful female lead while also having misogynistic side characters you gotta let them stand on their own

He was pretty cheesy in She Hulk but at least Bruce got peace in some form. It implies that he’s by himself, and comfortable. (Disclaimer: didn’t like She Hulk as a whole)

The start of your post is like one of those meme posts joking about 'Morbius' or 'Rings of Power' - - "The part where Galadriel took out a lightsaber and said 'It's Galadrieling Time' just gave me chills!" Then I remembered that this actually happened in a real Marvel show.

@@atomicdancer I wasn't kidding around

How? Why would toddler write something like that?

@@atomicdancer lmao thats spot on! At least we got that ben shapiro rapping over the tweking meme. That was a golden pheonix rising from the dung heap

More likely a Gen Z TikToker.

that's exactly like not hiring a doctor because they know medicine and human anatomy but instead hire someone who doesn't get how it works

I disagree, some of the issues I have have a link to the comics, they should hire people who love film and respect the comics, unfortunately it seems most writers don’t understand what makes a script good

Hell I feel like a lot of times the comic industry doesn't hire people who love comics.

what was the issue with Scott Derrickson??? why didn't they go with his ideas????

@@vice2versa I think he left because of "creative differences" but I feel like there was something else, they just fired him and I don’t really know the reason why. He could save phase 4 easily but they just let him go

@@tvtaughtmethismess yeah, I wonder what his plans for Dr Strange 2 were going to be? I know he originally wanted it to be a full blown horror movie but I wonder what his plots were? I hope he wasn't going to go with the whole "wandas" the villain BS because that partly ruined the movie for me, that and when she just completely destroyed the illuminati like nothing, basically making every cameo completely unimportant to the story.

@@vice2versa Wanda was technically going to be a villain at the END of doctor strange and nightmare was supposed to be the main villain and he was supposed to trick Wanda and at the end of the movie Dr strange and Wanda would team up but she would eventually get possessed by Darkhold

@@vice2versa illuminati would be different and I think even more comic accurate even Magneto would join and he would recognize Wanda and he would say it’s his daughter and messed up shit. But they removed that and it was a plot leak

This movie straight up Ruined Wanda imo. the illuminati was also wasted. Dr Strange 2 was the movie that completely turned me off marvel. I enjoyed Eternals but Dr Strange 2 did not live up to expectations, especially compared to Spiderman No Way Home.

America shouldn't have been in this movie in my opinion. They could've come up with so many different ways to explain the existence of and travel through the multiverse. But instead they just threw her in as the McGuffin. The Loki series literally has no bearing on this movie.

Well I can answer half of your #1 point! If the demon got ahold of her it could use her powers to bring her back to Wanda. But no I don't know how they got there in the first place. Maybe she summons them while dream-walking. The rest are all giant plot holes though.

@@ZeroKitsune Yeah i kinda thought about that too but there are like a billion times where the monsters are literally right in front of her or holding her but they dont do anything so idk lol

Oh man, if you have this many questions about a Sam Raimi movie, you should just never watch Army of Darkness. I loved Dr Strange 2 because I'm a horror fan first. It didn't have to try to make everything make sense, because it's a fantasy about wizards. I was also glad that they're willing to kill off characters now, and that the movie didn't become about the Illuminati and all their stupid problems. More brutal deaths like Black Bolt please

Exactly. It became abundantly clear to me the moment they introduced Sylvie while giving her most of the bigger magical elements and have her make more plot-important choices, that she was the main protagonist in the show not Tom Hiddleston's Loki.

Idk how you got the word about wrong 3 times. Also, okay, Hawkeye isn't mainly about hawkeye, but he's in the name, so he'a pretty relevant in the plot, but Loki is about both Loki and Sylvie, because the first 3 episodes are about Loki mostly, he's still in the show after that episode but Sylvie is introduced, and also why name it Loki?

@@bvq330 That's the point though. They are named one thing, but are about something else. Aka: bait & switch. I'll add Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness into the mix; it follows that girl and her story more so than it does Steven. With Loki, he's NOT the main character. He's just there until the audience gets to Sylvie who's actually the protag. Also also, why does my version of about, "aboot," bother you so much 😂 it's done very purposefully, I assure you dear fellow

@@Arthas30000 ok thank you for the clarification on the topic and about the aboot.

@@bvq330 My pleasure 😁

Loki’s 5th episode was pretty epic imo but I respect yours

Hawekeye screwed up hard at the end. They failed to get kingpin right. We didn't get to see Hawekeye vs kingpin which is really a crime in his own show.

Loki got seriously ruined the moment he got knocked around by human beings

I read that the writer straight up ignored the plan because ONLY HE wanted to use Scarlet Witch and not let OTHER WRITERS do the villain arc. Why didn't Feige straight up fire him right there?

Writer and Director admitted that they did not watch Wandavision :(

Actually, the Darkhold did corrupt Agatha.

Yeah it baffles me when people say that it felt natural for her character arc after WandaVision. Like...what? She decided to STOP using other people for her own ends at the end of that show and now she just flip-flopped on that and it's supposed to be "natural?"

​​@@nonsoobieyisi3329Yeah, the Darkhold obviously corrupted Agatha, but I think they mean that it didn’t show on her much. Wanda was delusional and violent while Agatha was grounded and in control.

Yep, you can't expect the fans to watch your shows and films after you attack them.

I find it ironic that the antagonists on She Hulk were misogynistic man babies who hid behind computer screens and you as fans are saying She Hulk portrayed its "fans" as the villains and that's why you hated it lmao

Unfortunately it won’t get better they have reached the point where the comic book industry began to fail manga is currently propping up comic book sales

@@kellylingro3288 That’s because it was written and directed by feminists that hate men. Men and women shouldn’t be hated on in any entertainment. Feminism used to be wanted women to be equal with men. Now it wants women to be better than men. Be kinder bud. Also, look at you, you’re being a good little sheep to the liberal hive mind. You’re using the words they tell you to use in every conversation with any unlike minded people, like “misogynistic.”

@@kellylingro3288 are you saying we shouldn't criticize she Hulk?

Seems like the noise people have been making regarding this phase is leading them to rethink their approach.

@@movieoverload Any chance the firing of the Disney CEO could change things?

@@OhSayWhatIsTruth let's be realistic here. even if that did change things, the CEO of all of Disney is not stepping down or get fired. Besides the CEO doesn't make the movies

It feels like they're more interested in shallow "representation" of minority groups (on screen only, not behind the camera!) to make profit, rather than wanting to represent people from these groups in a way that irl people from these groups would find interesting or relatable. Like as a queer person, none of Marvel's "gay representation" (if you could even call it that) has done anything for me - it seemed more like a box ticking exercise so that they can tell the higher ups that zomg they made a film with one (1) gay in it!!! Diversity achieved!!! Who cares whether real gay people even like it, we can market the movie as being diverse and make even more money!!! :)))) The profit motive is antithetical to good representation imo.

I like the word "woke" because it is short, and everyone more-or-less know what it refer to. "Performative Virtue-Signalling Academic Lecturing about Identity or White Liberal Guilt" are simply too long. Instead of heteronormative, I used the word "straight". Instead of non-binary, I said nothing.

​@Account.for.Comment maybe you need to realise that being "woke" actually means you just want human rights? And equality

@@brotherhoodjames2270 I' m for human rights, I'm for equality, I' m for humanity. I' m not for forcing everybody to adhere or perform to a rigid code of speech and behavior like schoolchildren listening to instructions from a teacher, throughout their adult lives. I.e. let' s not insult people by calling them "homeless", let' s call them "unhoused" like animals. The people destroying human rights can and has always come up with new fancy words to justity the status quo, deflect responsibility and fake improvements. George Carlin and George Orwell, explained the effects of those words years ago. The word "Woke" is the an inverse of today buzzwords. It is short and is used-widely by popular sentiments, unlike the jargons being defined and forced dowm by academia, media and corporations.

I hate the word woke because it’s always steeped in conservative/right-leaning dogma and it’s such a pain to have to say “I agree that the depiction of minorities by Disney has been a disaster but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be depicted at all”. Because the people blaming everything on wokeness are not mad that minorities are depicted poorly, they’re mad that they’re being depicted period. And I don’t want to make them think for a moment I agree with them

The recap thing is Marvel Legends. Short recaps of each character as connected projects release. BP: Wakanda Forever had 2; one on T'Challa and one on the Dora Milaje around the time the film came out.

Nice to see I wasn’t the only one who liked Hawkeye. I certainly would put it above FatWS, and probably even MK, too. (Because of the 2nd half of MK, like he said.)

I enjoyed Hawkeye as well, I’ve always liked Clint as a character and like black widow, deserved a solo movie long ago. That being said, i did think hawkeye was a decent sendoff and one of the better “passing of the torch” moments in phase 4. Plus rodgers the musical was pretty hilarious. Great idea as well about swapping the falcon and eternals. Never occurred to me but you absolutely nailed it. Finally I don’t think the mcu had an issue establishing a new avengers kicking off point, but instead they tried to kick off multiple avenger like stories and made the whole thing bloated. Not only did you have new avengers like shang-chi, but they were also introducing a young avengers cast & the thunderbolts. I also suspect that they we’re setting up an disney plus group since some of those characters seemed a bit too small or similar to the main avengers group - not to mention how many avengers there currently are there already. Think it’s going to be one of the main problems moving forward, too much going on for the casual viewer and may out them off.

I agree! I loved Hawkeye, it rounds out his ark and discusses what he did in the 5 years spreading some light on that for people who don't read the comics and had no clue wtf he was doing (like me). Phase four should've been a middle point, not the start of the Multiverse saga but also not the end of the infinity saga, it should've done both have an a and a b side to it maybe with either the movies ending stories started in phases 1-3 discussing and fixing the mess they made in endgame whilst the other brought in new characters so those wanting to end there marvel journey can and can ignore the new characters, the ones just starting out can ignore the ends of the old characters and the others can be along for the ride

Would be weird to see Chris Evans as Johnny Storm again.

I wish Disney hadn't bought out Fox just so Marvel can get their shit back.I like that they're were separate studios making comic book films.

This owner of this video only likes the comments that say good job or this is one of the better reviews lol kind of says something there XD

Nah, this dude got the most L opinion, this review was properly trash

Hello there

@@Sienisotabut it wouldn’t make sense how Thor beat Gorr

Phase 5 will kick ass. It was only phase 4.

If you read the comics, you would know why both of these were shit adaptations. Moon Knight (for example) is suppose to be this tough guy in his youth who brutally killed innocent people and children for fun/money before getting betrayed by his mercenary partner "bushman" and dying. After getting resurrected by Khonshu, Marc Spector seeks redemption for his past life and slowly goes insane from the guilt. In which every key aspect of his superhero career has to be flawless. If say his Khonshu statue gets broken, the man gets a panic attack from it. Everything must be perfect. Also Khonshu was never suppose to be real, just a near death hallucination that cause Marc Spector to become a better person in fear/faith of what Khonshu has gifted him. And Marc Spector was never abused by his mother in the comics. However Marc Spector as a teenager/young adult would beat up and abuse his Dad for being a "Pathetic loser". If these projects had Netflix adaptations like Daredevil, you'll probably see why even Moon Knight and Werewolf by Night were Bad Marvel Comic film adaptations.

​@@RamsTheNameCom2.0 Couple things 1. You didn't even mention WBN only Moon Knight and WBN was actually pretty comic accurate. 2. Out of all the reason to say that Moon Knight wasn't a faithful adaptation you missed it on almost every case. 3. Khonshu has never been said to be real or not it depends on the writer if he is and it really goes back and forth 24/7 4. In recent runs (Lemir, Bemdis, etc.) MK has a lot more tragic of a backstory and it is stated his DID is due to abuse at a young age and with that he never really was fond of hurting innocent people just did because he needed a leader which Khonshu then filled

​@@RamsTheNameCom2.0 if you only read the og run it is different 100% but MK hasn't been the character you're describing in about a decade now and you can't base it off of that

@@irishhotshot6765 Moon Knight's backstory of having his mental illness solely being revolved around his PTSD trauma of killing innocent people during his mercenary days, has always remained canon up until the 2014 Moon Knight run which changed it to "Khonshu being inside his head just gave him brain damaged". (It was still canon that he wasn't mentally ill until he met Khonshu). Even in the 2011 Bendis Moon Knight run that gave him DID inspired by the non canon Ultimate Spiderman comics that Bendis also wrote in 2005 (he invented Moon Knight having DID), Moon Knight's mental health issues were still canon as being related to his PTSD from his mercenary days. Bendis didn't know shit about DID. But it later came back as canon in the Jed Mackay 2021 Moon Knight run as a combination of PTSD from his past of killing and brain damage from Khonshu. A combination of both Doug Moench 80's canon and Warren Ellis 2014 canon. (To later be retcon by Jed Mackay a Graphic Novel and 3/4 later, for MCU and comic book synergy. So his DID being related to child hood trauma came back). The point is, MCU is ignoring almost 40 years of Moon Knight history in order to adapt a Moon Knight story inspired solely from the lore of two comic runs (Jeff Lemire & Max Bemis). Jeff Lemire 2016 being a polarized Moon Knight run that die hard fans hate because it ruins the whole point of Moon Knight (It's called "All New and All Different" for a reason). And the Max Bemis 2018 Moon Knight run just being the comic run that everyone hates in general. Also in interviews, the writer and show runner for the MCU show admits to hating the character and his villains. He only wanted to make a Moon Knight show for "mental health representation" and that's all. If Moon Knight didn't have the Jeff Lemire run, the showrunner and people at Marvel Studios would not be interested in adapting the character. They only wanted to make a Moon Knight show to virtual signal about Mental Health issues, for a character who's PUNISHMENT is meant to be his mental health issues. You're suppose to want to see Marc Spector suffer from mental health issues and "laugh at it" because he deserved it. It's kinda like a "Christmas Carol" situation, you see Ebenezer Scrooge as a bad person and you want to see him suffer mentally until he becomes a better person. If they truly wanted to tell a Mental Health representation story..... just make a Hulk movie or show. He was always meant to have DID and was abused by his dad as a child every since the 70's comic canon. It would have been perfect.

@@RamsTheNameCom2.0 Bendis didn't give him DID he made him Scitzo with Wolvie, Cap, and spiderman being voices and figments but throughout there is only one time he acts like the other and that is the strip club. Also idk who you consider to be due hard fans but lemires run is the most popular moon knight series so far even before the show. As well McKay's current run heavily follows Lemires run as well like every MK after 2016 tbh. You may not like it that is a choice but Lemire is the main MK Lord now

Nah it was definitely the jokes. Not only crappy jokes, but jokes that remove the tone of the movie. Gorr as the villain? You NEED NEED NEED a dark tone, can’t have Thor joking with Sif AS SHE IS BLEEDING OUT

@@Neon1880 You do make a good case. I don’t know enough about Gorr because no one was reading Thor prior to the Avengers movies. Though I think if they had included actual comics, maybe it would’ve been less terrible? Though thinking about it, maybe Gorr was part of the problem too. I mean, it’s killing gods. Okay. None of the gods being eliminated were all that established, so they’re the equivalent of an innocent bystander being shot in a Robocop movie. Just background dressing. Perhaps if Marvel had established any of those gods during the previous Galactic crisis, their deaths might have resonated more.

It wasn't Sam Raimis fault. Micheal Waldron was the writer, and the marvel producers deside where they want the story to go. Sam Raimi did well with what he was given. Alot of his scenes were cut and re-shot which effected the movie. America Chavez was never supposed to be in it. You can tell as she seems like an insert.

It was very goofy but Thor Love and Thunder really sank the ship.

Not even close

I'm glad it did end this was a very lame start without Robert Downey Jr Iron man I knew it was going to suck.

It should have been a tv show.

@@sosoadja7663 Truly ironic because most of their shows would’ve been better served by being movies.

Wakanda Forever/No Way Home and WandaVision/What if

Shang Chi and No Way Home

I thought that the show was interesting up until the sitcom was over. I went in blind and figured they were genuinely doing a sitcom, liked it, and flaked as soon as they started pulling the “Wanda enslaved a whole town and forced them to share her nightmares”

yeah i think it would've been nice for Wandavision to be a funny sitcom show that didn't really have any plot relevance and was just for people to stay interested in Marvel during Covid. Same with Loki, I love Loki so much but he's had his character arc, had his plot relevant story, if you want to do fanservice with him let him have a funny little show maybe about before even the first Thor with shenanigans in Asgard or his time in sekar and how he got the grandmasters favour. They could've done so much with him without undoing his sacrifice in infinity war