All of her lawyers don’t let anyone finish speaking. Why doesn’t the judge stop this from continuously happening?

Imagine having “a journalists opinion ” as a credible source in court? Like they really having nothing to serve.

the fact that TABLOIDS were even allowed to be used as EVIDENCE is absolutely INSANE... LITERALLY the definition of HEARSAY...

“No sir, Im afraid I don’t have a picture perfect memory of every specious clickbait article written in an obvious effort to dog pile Depp.”

Can’t believe the lawyer is using tabloid gossip as a measure of proof to gauge Johnny’s integrity. Absurd beyond reproach. Speechless!

Lawyer: Calls hearsay on everything. Also that same lawyer: Uses articles based on hearsay as evidence.

I cannot believe how absurd this lawyer is!!! Almost trying to force the witness to make a claim/statement based on articles written by others?? I mean, is he REALLY a lawyer??? If HE is, I TOO can be a lawyer!!!

"Does she have another husband?" Knowing that Heard has lied about pretty much everything, she probably does.

Can’t believe this guy is a professional lawyer. He doesn’t even let the person finish their answer before asking another question. Every time he asks a question you can tell he doesn’t even know if he should be asking it.

I just don’t understand how the defense objects to everything as hearsay, yet uses tabloid articles as proof - aren’t those a prime example of hearsay????

Seriously this lawyer is like: "So you are aware of Johnny's existance? Yes "So you are agreeing that he is guilty"

This line of questioning is beyond desperate.

For me personally, Amber's goal of trying to make the public hate Johnny and destroy his credibility has had the opposite effect.

watching johnny smile throughout all this gives me life

This gentleman is extreeeeemely patient. Much respect!

I love how they're trying so hard to prove Johnny Depp has struggled with addiction. He's never tried to hide it. He has even talked about it in TV interviews.

It's amazing how much nonsense this judge has allowed, how disappointing.

If the public is getting annoyed with Heards lawyers then you know the jury is as well. Guy kept asking different versions of the same question over and over and over.

I love this guy. The lawyer is using tabloids, literal pieces of teen gossip, and this guy is just dealing with him like he's a snarky child (which, at this point, all of AH's lawyers are).

Did she have another husband, indeed. The deaf team definitely had the better lawyers. I don’t remember any of them asking such ridiculous questions, over and over and over.

The fact that these lawyers are going off on “posts/articles” made from people who have never once spent a second with both or either one of these people as facts is laughable. Anyone can write anything to get a second of recognition or infamy

This lawyer is disgusting. He keeps saying "you would agree" when he never outwardly says he agrees. This is a joke. This case is going to kill his career.

“You would agree that… right?” Is that leading the witness? Glad that no objections were made. This was funny to listen to.

How can a lawyer use random news articles as facts! This is ridiculous

This comical court case is making Johnny Depp’s popularity soar instead of bringing hate to him. Good job Amber👏🏽👏🏽

Marks has a lot of patience with those insufferable lawyers. Not everyone can handle such annoying gaslighting.

This attorney could not control his anxiety. I cringed whenever he got up to examine anyone. Isn't he the same guy who called "objection, hearsay" on his own question?

a lot of people are saying how the judge appears biased with how she won't cut off Amber's judges when they make obvious mistakes, but I have to disagree I think the judge, for as impartial and educated as she seems, is having a little thrill letting heards lawyers absolutely destroy their own case themselves. they don't need a judge to stop them after every sentence to prove what a poor job they're doing, she just let's them go at it and utterly embarrass themselves.

Amber’s lawyer tried to break this witness with ridiculous and pointless “hearsay”, but the witness did a great job by not busting out laughing.

How can this type of hostile questioning keep going?? It’s pathetic and unprofessional! AH’s lawyers are plain rude.

What is wrong with this lawyer?!? Omg he’s insane

I’m cringing everytime this lawyer says «correct ?»

This trial is a perfect example of the old saying: Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.

Imagine being a junior lawyer talking to a practicing attorney of 50 years like this. Man that must be embarrassing, Amber's career isn't the only one she ruined, this defense team won't see another trial anytime soon.

“Netflix is a joke.” I don’t know why that made me laugh.😅

Whether he wins or loses, his and his legal team's demeanor has won the internet and he can live in peace. If there is any justice in this world, he should win handily. But knowing how the law works, they may even screw this over

the fact that this lawyer is getting so heated, argumentative and almost yelling says A LOT. not to mention cutting the witness off and bombarding him with questions without letting him answer the previous ones. so unprofessional and inappropriate. they really are grasping at straws and have NO case xD

I like how the judge is allowing us to see that these lawyers have NO CASE, suck at what they do and loose emotional control while on the job. I think she's doing a service by letting us and jurors see workers like this, they are terrible at what they do.

These have got to be the worst most annoying lawyers ever…they ask a question and won’t let the person answer….

Haha I love this man. He's so gangster. He's been a lawyer since 1973.

When Heard's lawyer introduced a fan blog as evidence I died laughing.

I really hope the jury isn't taking these questions seriously. Shouldn't questions about tabloid articles fall under a hearsay objection?

I would’ve refused Amber’s case. Even if I was a good lawyer I wouldn’t let my career get destroyed by representing her.

I don’t understand how the defense objects to everything as hearsay, yet uses tabloid articles as proof!?! Those are in fact examples of hearsay!!!

Her Attorneys have “Anger Issues” just like their client! So rude & definitely NOT Professional! It’s painful to listen to them! 🤯

I have said this before and I will say it again and again and again: the whole world is with you Johnny!!!

It’s painfully obvious that, in society, there is a difference between self destructive behavior such as occasionally being too drunk and looking silly, and being the abuser in an abusive relationship. Heard’s lawyers are trying to equate the two, but the jury won’t buy it. They are in no way equal. Society tolerates people getting drunk and being silly, as long as they don’t hurt anyone. Society doesn’t tolerate someone being physically abusive to their spouse.

This attorney's really trying to say JD was the Hollywood joke, when he's representing a chick nobody even cared about UNTIL she got with JD 😆 Like, my guy, what were you trying to do here???

"Most overpaid actor" Sounds like it was written by a jealous underpaid actor. Johnny Depp is a fantastic actor. There will always be people in life who try to drag others down with mob mentality

This lawyer is unbelievably discourteous to anyone he’s interviewing. This was super interesting and actually quite comical to watch 🤣

Lawyer behaving like a student in mock up trial. Good to see he is getting schooled

The judge should have stepped in here and said "enough." What a waste of time.

He's asking someone to AGREE to a news article title that specifically says "allegedly". So the reporter didn't even know for sure....yet this lawyer is using it as fact? Unbelievable.

The way the lawyers constantly say “you agree” “correct” “would you not” they’re repeating themselves to create a false narrative and trying to get into the juries head by proxy.

I really REALLY hate how the lawyer says “You would agree that…..”. And then the witness says “No” then the lawyer goes off to the next question saying “AND you would also agree that…..” Wtf? He never agreed with your supposition, but you’re wording it in a way that makes it seem like the witness DID agree with it. Did anyone else catch that?

I’m not even being questioned and this dude is raising my blood pressure.

Love his remark, “ think I already testified…” “are you just going to keep reading these?”, “I don’t know currently right now Netflix seems to have a running joke…” such great counters! I especially love how he pointed out, “I don’t know did Amber have another husband who she claimed was abusive in 2016?’ Such great responses! Whew!

She's literally on tape admitting she assaulted him. How is she not under criminal investigation?

Never paid much attention to JD before this whole saga.. but must say, becoming a huge fan of how he’s been able to put up with this crap throughout his life. All those complaining about his drug addiction should be put up on trial for causing it in the first place.

I love how JD's lawyers are not objecting to any of this, instead letting her lawyer make a total fool of himself!

How is the Judge allowing the lawyer to just interrupt the witness like that? It's just inappropriate. Unless it's because it's not in the defence's favour and the Judge just wants it to be over and is having a laugh. Defense interrupting every single witness. Just as the witness is expected to be respectful in Court so does the lawyer. If not more so. Disrespect left and right from AH's attorneys. A complete an utter shambles on top of weak questioning of witnesses and lack of basic principles/courtesy and information. Can't wait to see her take the stand.

This man was amazing to watch live lol

This lawyer is a joker runs before he walks

at this point these guys are just asking the dumbest questions so that amber can fire them too

The Attorney now is grasping at straws. You can hear it in his voice. He’s so proud of himself. pfft.

Everytime this lawyer talked I knew I was in for a lot of "correct?, don't you agree?, & and you would agree?".

This witness was the most honest down to earth you could wish for !

It’s actually beautiful how Johnnys Lawyers are letting AH lawyers ask these ridiculous questions over and over. They know it’s annoying the jury and only helping Johnny. They could have objected with “hearsay” lots of times but just let the guy keep digging his hole deeper.

The idea that Disney sacked JOHNNY DEPP for being drunk rather than the allegation of wife-beating is just ridiculous. That's quite a reach. I doubt any of the parents of the kids he visited in a hospital or whose days he's made in full character were concerned about his personal issues before the allegation of physical violence. If Disney started drug testing their actors they wouldn't have any left.

Lawyer dorked up with those questions.

Who wouldn’t be drinking with all of the misery he was dealing with after getting with this toxic woman? Pfffftt

Her lawyers were constantly reading articles from trash magazines. They literally collected them all. I was surprised that the judge allowed that. And this are highly paid lawyers? So ridiculous.

Great strategy by Depp's lawyer here: they could have made so many objections that probably would have been substained, but they let it play out instead to let everyone see just how bad Heard's lawyers are.

The lawyer here mentions, like, a million articles painting Johnny in such a bad light and yet doesn't even show any of the articles he was saying. Dear god, that begs the question if those articles actually did exist

I’m not a lawyer and know nothing about being one but… that was not good. How did this guy get into law school and get to where he is? That was terrible.

WHAT IS WRONG with this lawyer lol. He sounds like he is having a panic attack just firing one after the other... desperate questions that make NO SENSE 😳

The lawyer was trying to make him lose his temper and say something like: "Well, articles are articles and whatever they said isn't really that important" therefore implying that what AH wrote wasn't that meaningful to JD career after it was published. Glad he didn't fall for it.

So you're telling me, this lawyer, studied for almost and if not, 10 years, to get this license. And.... he is like this?

I literally would have had to ask the judge for a break if I were a witness, it would be so hard to hold back from cussing out someone on Amber's team. They interrupted all of the witnesses during almost every answer and had invalid objections for questions that hadn't even been fully asked. The case would have been over already if it weren't for her lawyers wasting the court's time day after day.

Lawyer: "do you agree that an article was written years ago saying this?!" Witness: "if someone wrote it, I guess it exists"

I now have a different opinion about her lawyers it’s not just that they’re bad lawyers it’s that her case is so full of inconsistencies & lies it’s impossible to get a clear side across and not look insane.

3:06 _"December of 2016, there's an article that says quote Johnny Depp is Hollywood's most over paid actor for the second year in a row. Did you recall reading that?"_ _"was that written by the second uh...uhh underpaid actor?"_ This had me laughing suddenly, even though I am half asleep!! 😂😂😂 And also _"I'm sorry, I haven't committed his IMDb page to memory..."_

*Why is the lawyer asking him about all those news citations like he was supposed to be reading every news.*

AH claims she did't mentioned Johnny Depp in the op-ed, and the witness said: "is there any husband that she have at the time?" is really on point.

Can someone legally trained actually explain why the lawyer is asking this guy whether or not he agrees that these articles exist?

WTF is he trying to prove? That random newspapers have headlines? This is an absolute ridiculous line of questioning. This is hearsay asking about hearsay.

the lawyer literally asking questions but refused to hear the answer and simply goes to next question??

“ARE YOU JUST GONNA KEEP READING THIS?” - Ambers lawyer expects this man to read and acknowledge all and everything written in rags.

This guy is brilliant for asking for the SOURCE of the articles. You could tell how embarrassed the lawyer was when he had to admit that he was using "insidethemagic" and "moviemagic" websites. Hilarious how they cropped it out, hoping no one would ask that question but the witness was too smart for that. The source is KEY. Anyone can write anything online. There is the expectation that the Washington Post is a reputable source and what it publishes is credible. Also her attorneys are so incredibly unlikeable and rude...I don't know how/why they would think that this is the way to get the jury on your side. I know they have been on the defensive, but it will be interesting to see how Mr. Depp's lawyer's comport themselves during their cross examinations. I will be shocked if they are are as abrasive as Heard's lawyers have been. Maybe for a murder trial this kind of strong arming of witnesses might be effective, but I really think it is the wrong tactic here. The public is reacting violently against Miss Heard and in favor of Johnny. While it's true that she has yet to present her case, I just don't think the public can be swayed. Her lawyers have painted themselves as bullies...we'll be biased against whatever they say from now on. Hard to believe the jury, composed supposedly of ordinary people, is reacting differently than the general public.

Amber has not only made herself look like a joke of a human but also made her lawyers look like absolute clown heads for trying this hard to defend her

Why does this lawyer seem so unhappy. Doesn't seem like he enjoys being a lawyer at all.

If you ever needed another reason to hate lawyers just try watching this video

I cannot believe her team has built their case solely around tabloid articles.

😂 great reply!! “Was that written by the second under paid actor”

At the rate at how fast Amber heards attorney speaks and just throwing questions to every person they cross examine, you would think they in a hurry to go somewhere. Like allow these people to speak. What kind of tactic is this? Asking a man questions on articles and expect him to give a straight answer on it is absurd on so many levels. This is so pathetic. Until they can allow these witnesses a decent chance to answer properly as its their right to do so lawfully, Amber's legal team shouldn't be allowed to ask questions.

Why is this judge allowing all this nonsense in court? This is ridiculous to me. So unprofessional.

For lawyers that love to say “OBJECTION HEARSAY” they sure do love hearsay in these articles. Like is that the core of your argument? Article titles? Really? That’s the base of your case? That’s pathetic

The fact the lawyer is asking such repetitive questions over and over again about something which is relatively unimportant is in itself a sign of desperation.

This lawyer is a joke! 😂 Quoting a bunch of tabloids, and articles, as if they are absolute truth... and he is just reading out his lines, expecting yes answers. And when the answers deviates from his questions, he moves on to the next question. What kinda tactic is this? 😂🤣

I don't get why they are always referring to headlines and articles from some random magazines and trying to present them as serious evidence. Everyone knows that those headlines are lurid to catch peoples attention and increase sales. Sometimes there are even partly made up just to get publicity. No sane human being can take this seriously. No wonder that poor man loses it.