Clifford raises a concern about belief formation. He describes that it is wrong, always, to believe when your evidence doesn't back it up sufficiently. Is this a moral error? What would be the morally right thing to do? Gather more evidence, remain uncommitted even if your evidence leans one way or another?
www.jonathanvajda.com
Email: philosophyvajda@gmail.com for questions, topic recommendations, interviews, direct instruction arrangements, etc.
Twitter: @jonathanvajda
If you want to say thanks with a tip or gift (say, buy me coffee?), I can accept PayPal, BTC, ETH and ADA. See my support landing page: jonathanvajda.com/support/