We, in California, do not need to vote as the rulers choose for us ! WOMEN ARE WORTH WAY LESS THAN MEN GLOBALLY i KNOW

Preach!!!!

These 3 segments were filmed a long time ago. They are just re-releasing them.

Avian Pegasus it’s all about lighting

@@farakhhanif well... Yes I suppose that makes sense

How is no one talking about that the wage gap is a myth

Many ppl are brainwashed by MSM propoganda, this wage gsp myth is used as a tool to drive a wedge between the sexes. It only helps to break apart families.

Could you imagine 9 months of a man being pregnant? Oh the whining.

@@admerin6961 Yeah almost like a woman or something.

@@DarkestAndBlackest lol, love the thin skin. Hilarious.

@@admerin6961 What thin skin? You have no idea how happy it made me to write that joke.

@@DarkestAndBlackest do Enlighten me oh wise one.....

What the ever loving FUCK I’m so sorry

The way THIS fatherhood bonus was calculated is a lie. The clip compared fathers who have wives doing most of the childcare to those wives. If instead, you compared fathers who do most of the childcare to women who do most of the childcare, you find the bonus goes to mothers.

@@theBear89451 , Dude, I raised my 3rd child as a single man since she was 4 years old. Never saw her mother again. If, and when, the % of Fathers raising children becomes equal to mothers , that's when your argument might make more sense. But, still not true. The fact is, businesses don't want anyone's stupid problems to affect them. So, they will treat anyone (who has to take it) like shit if they can. Are you the "house husband"? If yes, good for you, if that's what works for you and your partner.

@Zuma Zuma You're missing the point. If you take a group of mothers who are the primary care givers, and decreased their job hours, of course they're going to make less than a group of fathers that often times increase their hours. Stay at home dads do not get a "father bonus." I get paid a lot more than my wife (a stay at home mom), but half of my income is legally hers. That's kind of relevant. This "bonus and punishment" is just the product of the division of labor. In toality, women do not have less money than men as a group.

I'm a veteran and it is very true. When active duty, every time I went in for a physical or other appointment, they drew blood and took a urine sample to check to see if I was pregnant. They do this with every female in the military, it's why our medical records are so much thicker than the mens' when we complete our service. If the pregnancy test comes back positive, they "offer" us an "opportunity" to be discharged. They can't blatantly kick a woman out, but it's clear that they want to nudge us out. And promotions do seem to come faster for men who have a lot of children. There are a small few women who give us all a bad name though. There was this one woman that would get pregnant every single time she would get deployment orders. A woman can't deploy while she's pregnant, obviously, so she was never deployed. She had so many kids that she ran out of ideas for names and actually named them after paint colors. smdh She gives all women a bad name. Sadly women like myself who don't have kids, and don't want kids, are called even worse.

And did about 1% of the research she should have done cause this whole segment is disasterously wrong. The Daily Show isnt news or journalism. Is a comedy show

@@babbotfinklestein9513 Which is why she's so funny. I guess you don't get "mostly" satire pieces.

Saying "All men..." does not mean "Mankind". If you say MAN, then that can mean Mankind or humans. But not Men.

Man an woman are created differently but they are equal man does is not more valiable than woman, neither woman than man. However, man is made for physical demanding or mental demanding jobs. Woman is of great value raising the kids and keeping the house because by doing so she is taking care of herself and her emotional cycles and the period. Woman can work they are higly valuable in jobs were intelligence in key to success, because woman learn faster than man. But putting woman to earn same as man in all occupations is unfair. Allowing woman to earn same as man will have iether two of these effects. 1. She will want to work and hire another person to care for the kids (parenting will be hired) 2. Woman will not gonna feel the need to bring kids to the world because in her mind will be children, house and cooking or no kids and more money and success. This two things destroy countries.. One kids will not be properly raised, or kids will resent mom and dad for lack of time like it happens right now in the U.S. Second woman will just be dissecourage to have kids, maybe 1 or 2 will be more than fine for her , because she want money and success. Whats gonna happen. Little by little an ethnicity will dimish until is no more for other cultures are having more kids. All the taxes accumulated to achieve success will be share to people who did not earned. Becaus the state spend 12k to 18k a year just in education and people paying over 50k on the middle class a year will be paying for many others after her kids. Money is just a tool of trade. The sillyness of humans is to think money is everything. We and God are everything, we invent the money and all we see today. We should not be fighting over salary, but over making communication between us better.

@@fernando9175 This argument you give is meaningless because we are talking about equality under the law. Not equality of skills, or biology. So stupid. Every time people go to this nonsense you can tell you completely don't have a grasp of what the "equality" discussion is about.

bro get a job and a nanny no rule says both parent shouldn't work both my parents worked and were very sucessful.

@@alraei1070 look just reflect on what you just said. Both work and get a nanny. My friend you just said the reason american is suffering right now. Nanny is just a person employee to feed and put attentionnto the kid and even helping the kid with homework if that person have to. That is success??? Is that success?? I believe that is negligence for the love of money. Money that yeah is good but neither both will carry to their grave. What they could catry to the grave is the principles the rules, the discipline, the attention. and the enjoyment they had with their kids on earth. Perhaps you parents have dealt good with it, perhaps you don't even see the diifference because maybe you were raise with nanny. But that is not the case of the majority of the people. That is not the case 90% of the families out there. Out there children are abused by people who are supposed to care for them, sometimes the nanny have some peopel in the house parents dont know and are a danger to the kid. The reality is that many children are raised by nannies giving them some food and tons of tv and help on homework, which educate the kid to be irresponsible around the house. They don't learn to pick their shoes and put themin order And because of these thing kids learn to be lazy even for school leaving them is the trap of poverty if parents dont help or middle clas in caee his parents help him. Because he learned such attitudes of beign taking care of then he marry, then his kids will learn to be bad with him and end up broke. This is what I see more common than anything else. Right now schools, elementary schools are having trouble with children it is so much that the police have been called. I have seen a case a kid turned so bad at school police were called mom didn"t know what to do. And the system told her to bring him to see and test some drug to keep him in places and avoid anger. Why did this happened, the children mom always work and the kid was cared by an old lady that put him to watch tv and help him do homework. I have seen these things thats why I speak

Tia B I feel sorry for u if u actually found that funny, but yet again you’re a woman and your comedic intelligence is next to zero like all other women. Reminds me that I’ve still never seen a funny woman.

@@socktier6334 What crap are you talking?

@@socktier6334 She is a comedian from a show on Comedy Central, gee, why would there be anything funny 🤔 Also, this chauvinistic comment is exactly why there is inequality between genders which she talks about in the video. You win the sit the fuck down award today.

Lightning Farron women aren’t funny is what I’m saying I’m sorry for not spelling it out for u I know your brain is very small considering you’re a female.

Tia B “comedian” anyone can call themselves that but she isn’t funny in the slightest and neither are any other women.

ikr, happy Mother’s Day, take some free misinformation

@Jesus Christ it does in certain industries

@Jesus Christ What's your proof?

@Jesus Christ lol you literally just proved that it exists or you clearly think it should. If the situation was reversed, men would be complaining as well

no one's Business Thank you!

and many women who owned land could vote in many states before the amendment and all men not owning land didnt get to vote just before they got the vote just the same year as the first world war.

Women´s soccer: They chose not to get paid bonuses but preferred a stable pay. They can blame their union.

Funniest thing bout the soccer team is they made their own contact instead of taking the contract the male team gets. Hence why they made less and wanted to sue. Cause they are oppressing themselves

@@Antropovich well 3 states (although some of these were only temporarily done to encourage more women to move there), allowed women who owned land to vote. I'm not sure that's many. Some states allowed women who owned land to vote, but only on things like school boards and similar. I'd also like to add that although the suffrage movement allowed white women to vote once the 19th was passed, poverty still excluded some. We see the suffragettes as such icons, but the women allowed to vote were mostly white upper middle class women. Poverty has excluded many people, regardless of race from voting to this day. In any state today without mail-in ballots, it is still difficult for anyone who lives paycheck to paycheck to get enough time (even though it is a right to leave work - many companies still tell workers to not leave or to vote before or after shifts) and those in poverty still struggle to get to voting locations (with some states like Georgia, outright closing locations and thereby making it harder for already struggling communities). Unfortunately most people excluded still tend to be black and brown communities.

I live in Florida. Tell me what I need to do please

Can you provide the source for me please?

Milo That was what the judge ruled. Megan Rapinoe disputes that was in fact the choice made by the women’s team. www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2020/05/04/judge-dismisses-us-womens-soccer-equal-pay-case---heres-why/amp/

The women's team did agree to a CBA, but they say they were NOT offered the "same contract" as the men's team. The judge said there were problems with other unequal conditions apart from pay. The men's assocation released this a few days ago: "The USMNT players continue to stand with the WNT players in their efforts to secure equal pay."

@@RA-ic8il kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mLJioaV7xt7Ocn0.html

Laura Hubbard...your dad sounds like a good man!

@@sheilameyers152 He was. I miss him sorely.

@@laurahubbard6906..... my mom was similar to your dad.....even though we all ( 4 daughters ) had typical female jobs (teachers ) we kept that "stand up for your rights" attitude.

Wage gape simply ain't real. Everyone gets paid for the work and results they produce. If you are really that good, you be getting paid satisfactorily to avoid getting pouched by other companies. No boss in their right mind is going to pay a woman equally to a man (or a man equally to a woman) based on just their gender. the employee has to demonstrate the getting paid more money will either: - Promote greater work ethic or success beyond what is expected at the employee's current pay, or - Prevent the employee from getting poached (if he/she is a high value staff member).

@Zuma Zuma That's an average, and it includes women who stay home to raise their kids for several years. Of course they're going to be behind the curve on their career, or even pick more flexible, lower paying jobs. And there is nothing wrong with that! There are trade offs in life. I will make more money than my wife, but she will get more time wth our kids... oh, and is legally entitled to half my income. They always leave that part out.

@@angrysocialjusticewarrior But we've all seen the Gape. It hangs around the Stares and the Leers.

I don't feel that it is very odd to hear from her, I saw her opinions on some matters and there are several misinformation. For example, just this video, I analysed what she said for gender wage gap and majority is just her jumping to conclusions and making incorrect claims... I can't believe the daily show is not fact checking such a video and spreading misleading information. Someone should really make a video to debunk all the bullshit she said. I only watch the daily show if its said by Trevor Noah as what he says makes sense most of the time. When it comes to her, i just switch it off, no energy to analyse time and time again whether she is correct or not.

Men renegotiate the terms of their contracts ALL THE TIME (before, during and after signing and/or completion of a deal)...why are you so offended if women do it?!?!? Talk about lack of equal treatment! Unbelievable!!!

Birth rate is low in west europa too

or the fact that Virginia ratified the ERA

@@agspr what era mean?

@@vtggas_2958 Equal Rights Amendment

I'd watch that

John Oliver was literally on the daily show staff for a long time...

@@valoriethechemist I know that. I meant an episode with John Oliver and Desi Lydic

@@valoriethechemist John Oliver literally HOSTED the Daily Show for an extended period when Jon left to go make a film or something :)

+1 Just try to explain it to someone else: What was she talking about? - Oh, it was about how women have fought for 100 years and still haven't got the equal rights amendment. - Depressing, right? - Well, actually I had to laugh so hard, best comedy for a long time, and it made me think, and stand up against this injustice. - And she delivers it like it is the easiest thing in the world. Just brilliant.

Been there a while now 😂

Yep... Bangladesh is doing a great job

@@defencebangladesh4068 yes

go live in bangladesh and see how you like it.

I think we're all Bengali bro 😂 truth be told been there a couple times - don't think I'd wanna live there long term but love visiting. Might be nice for retirement 😉

@@cpmondello Dude his bottom line is basically don't play victim and take responsibility.

@@cpmondello Are you mental? He's against people regretting it after the fact and calling it "rape". Literally just watch any of his material rather than basing your opinions from the media

Corey Mondello Where does he support rape. ?

Why is he sighing?

@@LunaLuna-cz7er because he is an angsty professor who discovered that he can hold talks to angsty teenagers to make lots of money over the demise of manhood or something and he does not even have to read up on facts to do it! I watched his Hitler bollocks talk and he displayed less knowledge about the Nazi regime than a German highschool student on how the Nazi ideology and party worked. In short, shoddy BS to self validate questionable ideas.

Seen it before... must be a reupload :S

The Daily Show is terrible since Trevor Noah took over. Apparently they can't even get this sort of simple stuff right.

www.nytimes.com/2020/01/15/us/era-virginia-vote.html

Monika Soffronow : It might be useful to quote a sentence from thi NYT article : « A deadline for three-quarters, or 38, of the 50 states to approve the E.R.A. expired in 1982, so the future of the measure is uncertain, and experts said the issue would likely be tied up in the courts and in the political sphere for years. » Besides, before the VA vote,5 States who had originally given their approval, rescinded it. This all means that the fate of the ERA amendment is far from settled, leaving the USA way behind many countries as regards gender equality. I think Desi made her point very clearly.

@@myriamickx7969 Wait, what? 5 states rescinded the ERA? If that's true it leaves me lost for words. I haven't heard this, which states?

They chose their stupid contract. Coulda woulda shoulda. They didnt.

Not so much.

@Ali Arafat well financial is very nice thing to especially in sport where you are at risk of injury. If a female soccer player gets in the beginning of the season, she knows she is still getting a paycheck. Male players on the other hand don't have that luxury. Also women only generated more money than men in 2016. 2017 and 2018 revenue was equal and before 2016 men always generated higher revenue.

Happy not equal day!

@@4ozscoop Equal pay is same as equality ,No equal pay means no equality.

D J - On behalf of the mums in New Zealand - thank you. We are all feeling incredibly blessed at the moment. Stay well, & be kind to each other. Jo

Somehow the soccer team stuff regained attention in the past few days. And I think it is still a thing so, it's ok to show this from time to time

@@nightgnome3205 it does need to keep being said until something happens, eh?

I'd still rather rewatch DS eps over the news anyways.

@@theloganpresley exactly! People need to be reminded that something is broken or they won't fix it. If you hear your vehicles brakes grind at one stop sign you will forget about. If you hear your brakes grind at every stop.....you can't ignore the problem and will do something to make it right.

@@pjmillah2172 we only need to keep calling it feminism until we don't. Eventually it'll be common sense that people are equal.

I think that it is interesting to look at the general stuff/stats too but fully agree with you. When a man and a woman (or people identifying in any other way) do the same job, they should be getting the same and if not then this difference is the one that should be getting publicity and obviously fixed). The other issue is women not getting promotions and when they do, it is usually later than men. This in itself is another massive issue. Even if the pay-gap is fixed, women would still be earning less because they are not getting into management roles as easily. There are exceptions but generally, most management boards do not have more than 20% representation of women. In my opinion, this is the root of the problem too. As for football (AKA Soccer): I think that the US women's team should be getting more than the men (Equal would also be unfair). They are more successful, have more fans, more income, and play more games. Also, some people are saying in Tennis men play more sets than women so why should they get the same since they don't play the same time - Even if we took this into account (I do not agree with it but just for argument's sake), the football game is 90 mins for both genders so there is no VALID argument here at all! In conclusion, I believe that player salaries should somehow be linked with the popularity and income of said sport. Equality would be that the players get the same percentage of the income. This solves the problem. So in countries where women's football is less popular and income is much lower, it would not be feasible to have equal pay as a flat number but it would be fair to get the same percentage of the income.

@@syodrome I absolutely agree, that is a very fair way to do it

The wage gap is just the average of all men and women and doesn't take into account jobs worked, hours worked or benefits otherwise it would be actual discrimination which is illegal. Also there's no wage gap when people are making minimum wage. Sorry your billionaire CEO women don't make as much as some billionaire CEO dude.

@@dracopalidine I appreciate what you are saying and if the "gap" in question were 2 or 3 %, then you would be right but in statistics where you leave out senior management, like for like, women still earn less. I don't have the numbers on hand but I've read about this a few months ago. Originally, I was of the same opinion as you but now I believe that it is not "just an average" and there is real discrimination. I also don't accept the easy excuse that women are paid less because they don't fight for more money as men do. Companies can actively do wage reviews on an annual basis to make sure that this doesn't happen but they chose not to. This choice is purposeful because they know full well that they won't decrease men's salaries but would need to pay women more... this is bad for companies on every level (but especially for their precious shareholders). I know someone who works in a University in Canada and they did a review of salaries (I think they do one every 4 years) and her salary was adjusted and was also paid retrospectively. Unfortunately, this (unfairness) happens and these reviews are needed. On the other hand, most sectors do not do this exercise EVER. Unfortunately, inequality exists.

@@syodrome I was pointing out the top earners because it's wholly a rich white women problem. It just doesn't exist for most Americans and if you just mean everyone on average then really we should be talking about the gap between say white women and Filipino women who have the highest pay gap ( earn the least on average). The problem is the basic premise of averaging out everyone in a particular group. I'm not talking about issues of less likely to get raises or promotions. The wage gap just doesn't take into account types of jobs worked, number of hours worked or benefits. Eg comparing a CEO to a wage earner is misleading at best There are a lot more men at the top than women. This is undeniable. (Honestly I don't care there's less billionaire women when I think it's unethical to make that much money anyway). So of course if you average all men versus all women it'll be higher. Men tend to work more hours too since women are statistically more likely to spend more time with family. It'd a bad premise if your not account that men work on average five more hours a week then women. Also the gap between the top earners and 99 percent of Americans is so skewed it's going to throw off any pattern you're trying to discern for almost the entire population.

Mad Hatter shut up u ungrateful bitch how about u go to Nigeria then. Wait u won’t go to Nigeria right. Why not? Are u being racist because Nigeria is black?

@@socktier6334 So your argument basically is "nothing needs to change because the US isn't the worst in the world"?

A Hoel “worse in the world” have u ever questioned who’s making those lists? Hint, it’s not a objective source it’s most likely from a liberal organization trying to push their agenda. And women have every single right in this country as a man does. Every single argument in this video that this feminist woman made was a lie.

MakaveliThaSavage the rage😂. But if that’s the case then why is there such an issue with passing the equal rights amendment?

@@socktier6334 It was published by The World Economic Forum. Are you really going to try to claim that that's a liberal organization? Did you not watch the video? Women specifically DO NOT have the same rights as men under the constitution. That's why they're trying to amend the constitution. Try watching the whole video and do a minimal amount of research before commenting.

If you're a woman and totally fail in life, you can still feel so accomplished by the mere fact of being a mother, therefore redeeming a losers life through basic stuff.

InHumanoXY LOL, I hadn’t thought of it that way. What would all the soccer moms be doing without kids? 🤣 (For the record, I am a mother to one child. Motherhood is overrated.)

Except the human race. I.e. fucking everyone.

@@InHumanoXY Actually that's true of everyone, not just women, and is the reason some people have kids. It's the one thing you can accomplish and is basically the main goal that society peer pressures everyone into accomplishing. Often when people are trying to accomplish that goal, they toss all idealism of changing the world for the better into the crapper in the interest of providing for their future generation. In other words, screw the future so you can provide for the future of your own child. There is also a bit of narcissism involved in that you are creating a miniature version of yourself.

@@winesap2 It´s way more difficult for a guy to have kids. A girl can just go out and find any guy willing to f her round the block. A guy has to try harder to get a woman to accept having kids.

Pretty sure i already watched this, i think its a reupload

Def a reupload for mothers day, also, Virginia passed the ERA in January 2020, so def filmed a while ago.

You say it as if all the people for the ERA are girls and all the boys are against

@@Derrickthepeng No

They are, unfortunately, correct. The Act being voted on contains an 'expiry date' clause, effectively making it impossible to ratify at this stage by its own internal wording. It is not the only Act to contain these clauses, and in previous situations those clauses where all adhered to if not ratified before the stated date. Only Acts lacking such clauses, such as the 27th Amendment which sat for 200 years before ratification, can be accepted due the wording within lacking any specific timeline. Personally: There are now enough States on board to hold a bloody convention! Do It... call the States together to vote on a fresh version of this Act! One that lacks this stupid clause if, for some reason, the States need more time to think....

@@Fuctmentality Could you be less specific?

@@Derrickthepeng No, Also couldn't be more specific. The term "good ol' boys club". had never been used to mean what you want it to

Susan B. Anthony was a hardcore white supremacist racist and eugenicist. She wanted to exterminate black people through eugenics. They forced black women into hospitals and surgically removed organs that allow for making babies. I don’t remember which organs they were. Maybe Fallopian tubes or whatever. The point is she wanted to kill as many black people as possible through eugenics (also called Planned Parenthood). And invoking her name is just a major sign that a white person is a racist. Because why would you celebrate a terrorist?!

@@abdelll9737 Can you provide some sources here?

Abdelkarim Karim sources?

ERA was passed by Virginia in January; however, it doesn't mean anything if 38 states ratify it, since the amendment is dormant in the federal legislature. It needs to be revived federally before it can apply.

@@lachlanhudson7404 Trump wants the case to restore the ERA thrown out. It is strange you can say such things when half the people in the country are women.

@@kaintshine he doesnt see them as women, he sees them as objects

@@lachlanhudson7404 at least not perceived as enemies, like feminist wants woman to perceive us man; as enemies.

@@fernando9175 enemies are human, objects are not

Oddly enough, even though several States passed it after the deadline, the era Amendment deadline to be ratified expired in 1979. Virginia's vote was basically symbolic.

Andi7 Amo Wow, what a... completely off topic discussion

@Andi7 Amo Senator Robert Byrd spent sixty years begging forgiveness from the public for what he termed, "the stupidity of his youth." Pedophilia is a vulgar and empty allegation against Bill Clinton. On the other hand, Donald Trump bragged about seeing underage girls naked at his pageants, being able to sexually assault women and get away with it, referred to his own daughter as a "hot piece of ass", and was introduced to his wife by Jeffrey Epstein. And apart from the fact that all of this is way the hell off topic, how somebody votes is their own damn business.

@@jarodstrain8905 Yeah, but it does give the amendment a chance of being revived in the federal legislature.

@@lachlanhudson7404 I certainly hope so.

I was asking myself the same thing, because it most likely is just a matter of how couples choose to organize their parenthood.

Anthony M i think that you have a valid point, but she didnt go deep enough in the topic to include that, the most famous was the declaration of sentiments so she just briefly described what it was. im sure if they did an in-depth video they would have

@@HT-pl8du Didn't have to go too deep into the topic to talk about that. You can watch this to see how she could have easily mentioned women of color: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oamfZJebmLW0hJc.html Honestly, I think it is a myth that white people like to put forth that in order to talk about the contributions of non-white people to anything, one has to go "deep" into the topic.

Source?

@@logoslive Even the video acknowledges that it's a difference in total pay between men and women...

Fathers have been marginalized and the effects of their absence are readily seen in terms of outcomes for those children in single parent (largely female) homes. The wage gap reflects life choices and has been debunked many times yet it keeps getting trotted out. I worked in heavy construction, zero women in it. The women worked in the office and were paid less, their jobs were less physically demanding/dangerous and this is a reflection of that. My company would have loved to have women working alongside us but they chose easier/safer jobs. (edit sp)

Trog Lodyte , that is another thing never mentioned in these wage gap videos; the disparity in workplace deaths between the sexes. Men account for over 90% of all US workplace deaths. I wonder what that is worth?

Trog Lodyte Well, there is a tiny gap if you account for all factors at play (including the ones you mentioned). That’s a gap which could be explained by sexism, but it seems that no one is entirely sure why that tiny gap exists. It is there, though.

@@InigoMontoya- This x 1000. I make the only money in our family, my wife stays home with the kids. They clearly have bonded with her much more than with me. But the other part they never mention: she makes zero as a stat, but she gets my income... *Most* women with children are getting money from the father in some form, that is nt accounted for in their "income."

Both teams were offered the same contract. The mens team accepted. The womens team negotiated for a different contract that they would prefer (base payment rather than money per match won) If the men had gotten the womens contract they would have earned more. (few won matches = less pay) If the women had gotten the mens contract they would have gotten more. (more won matches, but a base pay was chosen that does not scale with the number of matches won) They were offered the exact same contract. The women negotiated a new contract that turned out to give them less money. That is not a gender issue, that is being extraordinarily bad at negotiating, then complaining about getting less money for not choose the offered contract (that the mens team chose). Hence the courts found it acceptable. Women do have an equal right to negotiate bad contracts. ..and legally do not have a leg to stand on for crying wage gap in this case. They chose the contract.

Jon White weird I’ve paid for most dates I’ve gone on, my own wedding ring, and more than half of our joint bills.... more women own homes than men honey 😉 just remember that.

Layla Ariel More single women own more homes than men. As you can tell my statement is speaking to couple situations. I applaud you for being one of the few willing and actually putting up the money. It’s clear that the social aspect of the conversation is not being had. It is still expected for men to put up majority and in some cases all the money in the cases I mentioned and others I did not. Until there is equal treatment and expectations across the board, there will be continued pushback on the issue.

Jon White listen, when we say equality we mean even when it’s not convenient. Remember women can my misogynistic too and the ones who are conditioned to think men need to pay for everything are just as much a product of patriarchy. Feminism literally includes men, making it so they aren’t seen as the sole providers and that men aren’t expected to work that they could stay home too if they wanted. Most likely my husband will stay at home with the kids, I’m perfectly happy with that. I think more women have this mindset than you think honestly.

Lmao

They didn't lose the law suit, it was just shot down. xD and yes, they filmed this segment in 2019, reuploaded it for mothers day.

They lost it because the women soccer team makes more percentage of revenue than men team does.. Women team revenue was only once more than men(last world cup).. So naturally they lost coz screaming nonsense doesn't help infront of the judge

@@user-po1rs6nw9w But the women have better stats in everything then the boys have done. so its bull shit

@@haydaboss231 It's not about who is better at what they do... An institution can give you the salary based on the revenue it generates.. They may be better at stats and achievements but they can't be paid more if no one is watching them.. It's not sexism, It's economics.

@@haydaboss231 But that is the deal THEY chose. Scotty Pippin was arguably the second best player in the league behind Micheal Jordan, but because of the deal HE chose, 100 other NBA players made more money than him.

So we just ignore all the inequality in salaried jobs?

That's the thing, they always present the 80% number as a metric for salary comparison and people believe you work the same and get paid that much less. The definition of a salary is how much you earn for a certain amount of work, If the amount of work is different then you're not talking about salary. This is done on purpose to fuel propaganda and It doesn't mean that the gap doesn't exist, It means that It is much smaller when accounting for the hours worked and the profession (why there is a difference in those aspects is another question and doesn't imply injustice). It is simply not ok to lie (or deceive by omission) even if you believe your point of view is deemed as right and that's why I don't support the feminist movement.

@@jamieironside1256 the biggest factor of the so called "wage gap" is total hours of work. In other words, "overtime". I know it's not the only factor but it's one of the biggest factors. They give you these numbers and don't back them up with solid data. I'm saying all of these from the outside looking in. And you Americans are looking for things to worry about because you don't have any.

@@kirkarvint.2017 I'm not American.

@@jamieironside1256 ok then. Let me guess. Probably first world, from the west.

?

That ... that's kind of amazing, in it's own way. Sort of like spitting against the wind, or aiming a gun at your foot with intent to pull the trigger. Your mom doesn't do any of that though ... right?

Yea they fucked them selves over with that contract by wanting guaranteed money instead of a performance based agreement

Jordan Ramos they didn’t ... their agents did

Layla Ariel - facts. It really sucks they would have made more under the original performance based contact. But at the same time u can’t sue for back pay if you agreed to change the contract to your preferred terms which was guaranteed money.

Randy from 'South Park'!!!!

@@nickleodiyan6362 Wtf?

@@nzd3742 @NIKHIL what does that mean. erect shlongs did what? im so confused 🤭

You mock but remember ALL ROLES went to MEN in Japanese Theater for a long period. Including Princesses.

@@jemiebridges3197 yeah, same in European culture

........so then they should make sure a man and a woman with equal ability and skill, get equal pay. Thats not happening now, hence the issue....

Hannah S There is no gender wage gap. It’s feminist jargon. Watch the Red Pill documentary and educate yourself on the subject.

Hannah S kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ptJkrZh0ppbLgIk.html

@J Bruce Right, so the woman would not have equal ability and skill in that scenario so the unequal pay would make sense.

Hannah S, The wage gap doesn’t exist. It is proven that men are more likely to ask for a raise, work longer hours, work more dangerous jobs, retire at a later age, and take off less sick days. We don’t keep these in mind, and when we do, the wage gap is almost nonexistent.

Yeah but my freedom to carry guns into a sandwich shop cause im a patriot is more important than silly girls. Duh.

@@4ozscoop hahahah

We are a developing nation. We'll get around to it after citizen wealth is transferred 100% to billionaires.(It's only 99% right now).

@@4ozscoop guns in a sandwich shop make no sense, in a supermarket where there is only one roll of toilet paper left, however, you can have a good old fashioned wild west duel😂😂

Rich white dudes hate anyone that has a vagina or is a shade darker than milk over here. Hell, one of those assholes is our president, what did you expect?

@@ssamcobalt4956 dude you can suggest your porn somewhere else

@@williamthatsmyname what are you talking about?

Wonder how far those women would get if they had to compete with men? The US mens team would beat the women at least 5:0 even if they were completely drunk. It isn't fair to compare mens football/soccer to womens football/soccer. Men have to achieve a lot more to get anywhere compared to women, because there is ~5 times as many male soccer players than female. To become one of the best 20 or so is therefore much more difficult for men than women. It's equal pay for equal work.

It looks like your opinion is not based on fact, rather than just on clickbait. If you look at why they lost the lawsuit you will understand its BS and the only reason the Women got paid less is that they choose it that way. The choose a less risky bonus plan and thats why the got paid less.

Philip Walker Look at what I wrote again and read it from a different angle. I agree with you 👍😉

@@RichardWrightFirth Sorry to jump in like this, but can you please elaborate what you mean by different angle? You didn't mean all you need to know is that the women did better?

@@philipwalker979 Wasn't it something about how you can't compare the two? How it's not the same job? Like the women are a big fish in a little pond and the men are small ones in a big pond.

Sorry but no, Ronnie and jordan klepper interviewing trump supporters are the only funny bits for correspondent level on TDS. The rest tries very hard to use sarcasm humour wayyy too much.

The military has boot camps too, and they're not taking anybody if they're not fit to go to war. It's never about gender, it's about getting the job done for the same pay.

@@shortzrus6060 A draft is initiated in times of desperate need. Its random and involuntary. They certainly will check on your physical, mental, and moral fitness. But 9/10 unless you're rich or well connected you'll be drafted to the front lines as nothing more than cannon fodder.

Your absolutely right I'm a feminist ally for exactly for those reasons. Sure also to support women but also because of self-interest. They Patriarchy is abusing us both, just in different ways.

The thing is that many guys don't realize that feminists also fight for them. For a long time feminists have fought to take sexual assault of men more seriously and don't stereotype men the way they often are. Also, feminists want parents to be free to choose which parent works more and which one might stay more at home for themselves. This is also great for fathers who want to spend more time with their children but are afraif of social repercussions.

@@Tessa_Gr this video with its misrepresentation of statistics sure doesnt make a good case for it. Also didnt feminists literally close down mens shelters in the us a few years ago

Tessa Grawe. Which feminist are fighting for men? Look at the punishments a female teacher gets molesting a student compared to a male teacher. Are feminist marching for equal jail sentencing between the genders (for all crime)? How about the family courts? Fathers are treated horribly in family court. If women in mass came out fighting for men....laws would be changed. Politicians want the female demographic. Feminist put words like deadbeat dad and toxic masculinity into our lexicon. They force things like the Duluth Model in the name of protecting women, conveniently not acknowledging that 40% of domestic violence is women against men. The most violent relationships? Lesbian women. If feminists wanted true equality, it would be here....like Bill Burr says, they look at it like a buffet, picking and choosing what they want.

True. I've been in concrete for 12 years and only seen 4 other women finishers that entire time. Even white men are a minority, I'm often outnumbered by Latinos but that doesn't bother me because they work harder than us whitey lol.

sess and I want them to be 50% of all US military personnel. Wait a second that wouldn’t work would it. Why not? Oh right because of a small thing called biological differences between men and women that feminists conveniently ignore whenever it suits them. They need to accept that men and women are different, sure everyone should be treated the same in society, but this whole crazed obsession with wanting women to pursue meaningless life’s working behind a desk rather than raise a family with a husband that is the breadwinner is evil and sick. Family is the backbone of society and every single study shows that a non nuclear family is worse than a nuclear family in every category imaginable, from likelihood of the children going into a life of crime to them being poorer.

They never address The Life Span Gap or The Jail Gap or the The 3D Job Gap.

@@socktier6334 But there are women that don't want to raise a family or don't want to destroy their careers for it. Why would you deny people the right to happines just because you don't like it? I'm a woman but I never want children. The only way would be if my partner really wanted them but would be okay with adopting and me still going to work normally. But if you had your way I could never fulfill any of my dreams and had a life I never wanted for myself.

@@socktier6334 Also there are no studies that show your sick worldview is true. It even has been shown that gay parents raise their kids as well as straight ones or often even better.